WHITE COLLAR CRIMES ABUSE OF PROCESS PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT LAWYER MISCONDUCT JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT : December 2014

http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2014/12/social-security-fraud-misuse-and-abuse.html

On Tuesday, December 9, 2014 2:41 PM, Sheila Shaw <nine09digits@yahoo.com> wrote:

Central Region

Karlene Cole-Palmer
CLS Regional Director
Children’s Legal Services
Department of Children and Families
400 West Robinson Street, Suite S1114
Orlando, Florida 32801
Office: (407) 245-0530

E-mail: Karlene_Cole-Palmer@dcf.state.fl.us

Karlene Cole-Palmer,

it is believed that the CPI in this complaint accessed the SDU, state disbursement unit on February 3rd,2011 and February 4th 2011 to intercept child support payments, as indicated by a SDU representative upon inquiry regarding a recent child support order, judgement, issued by Division 42, Orange County, Florida, respondent and payor, Carlos Alberto Gonzalez. The CPI false allegations were intended to intercept payments, indicative as a white collar economic crime, fraud. The CPI made this intercept by deception on the court and fraud alleging that my children had been kidnapped as a dismissal was entered agaiinst Felicia Handley, the CPI in this complaint on January 28th, 2011 after without a court order or any documentation she not only harassed me in public, but violated the children's and my rights the evening of January 27th, 2011 arriving at a convience store with the Orlando Police Department. Felicia Handley's accompanying agent jumped out a gray yelling "it's over", 'its over" as witnessed by Orlando Police Department. The incident occurred on the evening of Michyl Shaw's science night at Ferncreek Elementary, whereas the parents and the children were transported by Orange County District Schools to Ferncreek Elementary and then home again. Shortly after departing off the school bus and walking over to the covenience store nearby our residence, the police and a gray car that Handley and the accompanying agent were in, pulled up in front of the convience store and detained myself and my children stating that they had a right to take the children that evening until court the following morning, and that they had already contacted the fathers of the children prior to arrival which is where the children were to be taken in to temporary custody without an order from the court until the hearing the following morning on January 28th, 2011.

At the hearing held in the judicial chambers of Judge Anthony Johnson, DCF representatives, the CPI, Felicia Handley were informed that there would be a dismissal and the children were to attend school, and until further notice of an eviction from the residential address, no action would be heard.

Felicia Hankley follows with a malicious, attrocious lie about missing children and kidnapping, that both Michyl Shaw and Isis Shaw had been missing since February 3, 2011, which was false, and verifiable by the children's primary doctor who had seen both children on the evening of February 3rd, 2011 while in the custody of the mother, myself. In addition, no staff members or persons of authority at the residential dwelling had ever given such information to Felicia Handley.

I am inquiring as to what action under Florida and Federal Statute has been taken against Felicia Handley or the Department in addition to further evidence of fraud on the court, intentional omission by DCF departmental attorneys constituting attorney deciet and misconduct, of child support recovery proceedings in division 42 of which the mother and the children were under representation druing which time there ware repeated "reserved actions", and actions in the case regarding termination of parental rights which were unauthorized, not consulted upon or actions that continued to delay recovery and collection from what is referred legal as CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT, under federal recovery. Chapter 39 details what is referred to as a "threshold of demonstrative illustration" by the noncustodical parent of financial support outside of any family support or mental support in the interests of the children (PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO CHILDREN http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0000-0099/0039/0039.html)

Sec. 411. Data collection and reporting

Social Security Act Title IV

https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/programs/css/child_support_handbook_with_toc.pdf

The federal child support program was

established in 1975 under Title IV-D of the Social

Security Act.

cc: letter

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sheila Shaw <sdynastysheila@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:20 AM
Subject: BARBARA FANCHER,TANGELRODRIGUEZ, Esquire,(Judicial Officer: Roche,(Judicial Officer: Evans, Robert M) Renee(Judicial Officer Winslow, George),
To: ombudsman <John.R.Peterson@dep.state.fl.us>, "Ombudsman@dos.state.fl.us" <Ombudsman@dos.state.fl.us>, ombudsman <Lisa.Kelley@dep.state.fl.us>, Ombudsman <Bonnie.Hazleton@dep.state.fl.us>, "pennsylvania health, Abuse<ncea@nasua.org>, ACE <acepresident@acecashexpress.com>,, ACE <acepresident@acecashexpress.com>, ACES, <aces@childsupport-aces.org>, ACESGROUP, <aceschildsupportenews-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>, ACLU, <aclufl@aclufl.org><paffairs@oig.hhs.gov>, Environmental Justice, <environmental-justice@epa.gov>, Ethics <contactOGE@oge.gov>,, Ethics <ethics@indiana.edu>, family violence, <fvdinfo@ncjfcj.org>, Federal Victims" <victimsrights@ic.fbi.gov>, HHSTips@oig.hhs.gov

BARBARA FANCHER,TANGEL RODRIGUEZ, Esquire,Hershkowitz Russell S Attorney(Judicial Officer: Roche,(Judicial Officer: Evans, Robert M) Renee(Judicial Officer Winslow, George)

Complaint regarding the subsequent violations:

FALSE STATEMENTS

MISCONDUCT

FALSE KIDNAPPING REPORTS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AND TO THE JUVENILE COURT

LEGAL PHILANTHROPY

MISUSE OF OFFICE

INSTITUTIONAL CHILD ABUSE

LEGAL ABUSE

LAWYER MISCONDUCT

ETHNIC BIASNESS

MOCKERY

TRIAL ERROR

INTENTIONAL OMISSIONS

ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT & CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY ACT VIOLATIONS, FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW VIOLATIONS

absent advance directives from practioners of which the child was

a patient

> 9457320158 (RFA CASE NUMBER 1143172973)

Div 42

Judicial Officer: Evans, Robert M

Uniform Case Number: 482005DR014270A001OX

https://www.facebook.com/ pages/Duty-to-report- misconduct/136147606416830

Duty to report misconduct

The duty to report misconduct is one

of the ethical duties imposed on attorneys in the United States by the rules governing

professional

responsibility. With certain exceptions, an attorney who becomes aware that either a fellow attorney or a judge has committed an act in violation of the rules of e...

BARBARA FANCHER,TANGELRODRIGUEZ, Esquire,(Judicial Officer: Roche,(Judicial Officer: Evans, Robert M) Renee(Judicial Officer Winslow, George),

The Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (VAWA) and the 1997 Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act

and

MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW

You cannot use information available to you because of your job, but not

available to the public, for your personal benefit or for the benefit of others.

§ 112.313(8), Fla. Stat.

Title VI allows persons to file administrative complaints with the federal departments and agencies that provide financial assistance alleging discrimination based on race, color, or national origin by recipients of federal funds.

Under Title VI, EPA has a responsibility to ensure that its funds are not being used to subsidize discrimination based on race, color, or national origin. This prohibition against discrimination under Title VI has been a statutory mandate since 1964 and EPA has had Title VI regulations since 1973.

EPA's Office of Civil Rights is responsible for the Agency's administration of Title VI, including investigation of such ...

A registered support order is confirmed and immediately enforceable unless the respondent files an objection in a record within a fixed period of time, almost invariably the 20 days suggested originally, Sections 603 and 607.

Section 604.

TITLE 42 SECTIONS 666 AND 654, 657 COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION CITATION FROM THE FEDERAL STATUTE OF THE US CODE

§ 657. Distribution of collected support

The following is an abstract from the Administration for Children and Families' website and the Administration for Child Support Enforcement, both of which publish all statutory guidelines for the collection of child support and payments thereof to the recipient.

collection and distribution of child support payments Within this site it is defined as follows Frequently Asked Questions about Child Support Collection/Distribution For answers to questions about your own case, you need to check with your local or state child support office. State CSE agency telephone numbers and addresses are at (English):http://ocse3.acf. dhhs.gov/int/ directories/ext/ IVd_list.cfm (Spanish):http://ocse3.acf. dhhs.gov/int/ directories/ext/ Espanol_IVd_ list.cfm State CSE agency web site links are on our web site at the following location:

http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/ programs/cse/extinf.htm#exta

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sheila Shaw <sdynastysheila@gmail.com >
Date: Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:49 PM
Subject: WHITE COLLAR CRIME/ Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT COMPLAINT- PEER REPORTING -Attorney General's Office regarding Rule 84 of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct contains the following statements on attorney misconduct-18 USC Chapter 47 - FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS
To: "pennsylvania health, Abuse<ncea@nasua.org>, ACE <acepresident@acecashexpress. com>,, ACE <acepresident@acecashexpress. com>, ACES, <aces@childsupport-aces.org>, ACESGROUP, <aceschildsupportenews- unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>, ACLU, <aclufl@aclufl.org><paffairs@ oig.hhs.gov>, Environmental Justice, <environmental-justice@epa.gov >, Ethics <contactOGE@oge.gov>,, Ethics <ethics@indiana.edu>, family violence, <fvdinfo@ncjfcj.org>, Federal Victims" <victimsrights@ic.fbi.gov>, contact@nw3c.org

http://www.floridabar.org/ divexe/rrtfb.nsf/FV/ 0B6C8E5CDCA464D685257172004B0F BD

4-8 MAINTAINING THE INTEGRITY OF THE PROFESSION

RULE 4-8.4 MISCONDUCT

A lawyer shall not:

(a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another;

(b) commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects;

(c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, except that it shall not be professional misconduct for a lawyer for a criminal law enforcement agency or regulatory agency to advise others about or to supervise another in an undercover investigation, unless prohibited by law or rule, and it shall not be professional misconduct for a lawyer employed in a capacity other than as a lawyer by a criminal law enforcement agency or regulatory agency to participate in an undercover investigation, unless prohibited by law or rule;

(d) engage in conduct in connection with the practice of law that is prejudicial to the administration of justice, including to knowingly, or through callous indifference, disparage, humiliate, or discriminate against litigants, jurors, witnesses, court personnel, or other lawyers on any basis, including, but not limited to, on account of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, national origin, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, age, socioeconomic status, employment, or physical characteristic;

(e) state or imply an ability to influence improperly a government agency or official or to achieve results by means that violate the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law;

(f) knowingly assist a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct or other law;

(g) fail to respond, in writing, to any official inquiry by bar counsel or a disciplinary agency, as defined elsewhere in these rules, when bar counsel or the agency is conducting an investigation into the lawyer's conduct. A written response shall be made:

(1) within 15 days of the date of the initial written investigative inquiry by bar counsel, grievance committee, or board of governors;

(2) within 10 days of the date of any follow-up written investigative inquiries by bar counsel, grievance committee, or board of governors;

(3) within the time stated in any subpoena issued under these Rules Regulating The Florida Bar (without additional time allowed for mailing);

(4) as provided in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure or order of the referee in matters assigned to a referee; and

(5) as provided in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure or order of the Supreme Court of Florida for matters pending action by that court.

Except as stated otherwise herein or in the applicable rules, all times for response shall be calculated as provided elsewhere in these Rules Regulating The Florida Bar and may be extended or shortened by bar counsel or the disciplinary agency making the official inquiry upon good cause shown.

Failure to respond to an official inquiry with no good cause shown may be a matter of contempt and processed in accordance with rule 3-7.11(f) of these Rules Regulating The Florida Bar.

(h) willfully refuse, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, to timely pay a child support obligation; or

(i) engage in sexual conduct with a client or a representative of a client that exploits or adversely affects the interests of the client or the lawyer-client relationship.

If the sexual conduct commenced after the lawyer-client relationship was formed it shall be presumed that the sexual conduct exploits or adversely affects the interests of the client or the lawyer-client relationship. A lawyer may rebut this presumption by proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the sexual conduct did not exploit or adversely affect the interests of the client or the lawyer-client relationship.

The prohibition and presumption stated in this rule do not apply to a lawyer in the same firm as another lawyer representing the client if the lawyer involved in the sexual conduct does not personally provide legal services to the client and is screened from access to the file concerning the legal representation.

Comment

Lawyers are subject to discipline when they violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another, as when they request or instruct an agent to do so on the lawyer's behalf. Subdivision (a), however, does not prohibit a lawyer from advising a client concerning action the client is legally entitled to take, provided that the client is not used to indirectly violate the Rules of Professional Conduct.

Many kinds of illegal conduct reflect adversely on fitness to practice law, such as offenses involving fraud and the offense of willful failure to file an income tax return. However, some kinds of offense carry no such implication. Traditionally, the distinction was drawn in terms of offenses involving "moral turpitude." That concept can be construed to include offenses concerning some matters of personal morality, such as adultery and comparable offenses, that have no specific connection to fitness for the practice of law. Although a lawyer is personally answerable to the entire criminal law, a lawyer should be professionally answerable only for offenses that indicate lack of those characteristics relevant to law practice. Offenses involving violence, dishonesty, breach of trust, or serious interference with the administration of justice are in that category. A pattern of repeated offenses, even ones of minor significance when considered separately, can indicate indifference to legal obligation.

A lawyer may refuse to comply with an obligation imposed by law upon a good faith belief that no valid obligation exists. The provisions of rule 4-1.2(d) concerning a good faith challenge to the validity, scope, meaning, or application of the law apply to challenges of legal regulation of the practice of law.

Subdivision (c) recognizes instances where lawyers in criminal law enforcement agencies or regulatory agencies advise others about or supervise others in undercover investigations, and provides an exception to allow the activity without the lawyer engaging in professional misconduct. The exception acknowledges current, acceptable practice of these agencies. Although the exception appears in this rule, it is also applicable to rules 4-4.1 and 4-4.3. However, nothing in the rule allows the lawyer to engage in such conduct if otherwise prohibited by law or rule.

Subdivision (d) of this rule proscribes conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice. Such proscription includes the prohibition against discriminatory conduct committed by a lawyer while performing duties in connection with the practice of law. The proscription extends to any characteristic or status that is not relevant to the proof of any legal or factual issue in dispute. Such conduct, when directed towards litigants, jurors, witnesses, court personnel, or other lawyers, whether based on race, ethnicity, gender, religion, national origin, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, age, socioeconomic status, employment, physical characteristic, or any other basis, subverts the administration of justice and undermines the public's confidence in our system of justice, as well as notions of equality. This subdivision does not prohibit a lawyer from representing a client as may be permitted by applicable law, such as, by way of example, representing a client accused of committing discriminatory conduct.

Lawyers holding public office assume legal responsibilities going beyond those of other citizens. A lawyer's abuse of public office can suggest an inability to fulfill the professional role of attorney. The same is true of abuse of positions of private trust such as trustee, executor, administrator, guardian, or agent and officer, director, or manager of a corporation or other organization.

A lawyer's obligation to respond to an inquiry by a disciplinary agency is stated in subdivision (g) of this rule and subdivision (h)(2) of rule 3-7.6. While response is mandatory, the lawyer may deny the charges or assert any available privilege or immunity or interpose any disability that prevents disclosure of a certain matter. A response containing a proper invocation thereof is sufficient under the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. This obligation is necessary to ensure the proper and efficient operation of the disciplinary system.

Subdivision (h) of this rule was added to make consistent the treatment of attorneys who fail to pay child support with the treatment of other professionals who fail to pay child support, in accordance with the provisions of section 61.13015, Florida Statutes. That section provides for the suspension or denial of a professional license due to delinquent child support payments after all other available remedies for the collection of child support have been exhausted. Likewise, subdivision (h) of this rule should not be used as the primary means for collecting child support, but should be used only after all other available remedies for the collection of child support have been exhausted. Before a grievance may be filed or a grievance procedure initiated under this subdivision, the court that entered the child support order must first make a finding of willful refusal to pay. The child support obligation at issue under this rule includes both domestic (Florida) and out-of-state (URESA) child support obligations, as well as arrearages.

Subdivision (i) proscribes exploitation of the client or the lawyer-client relationship by means of commencement of sexual conduct. The lawyer-client relationship is grounded on mutual trust. A sexual relationship that exploits that trust compromises the lawyer-client relationship. Attorneys have a duty to exercise independent professional judgment on behalf of clients. Engaging in sexual relationships with clients has the capacity to impair the exercise of that judgment.

FALSE STATEMENTS

MISCONDUCT

FALSE KIDNAPPING REPORTS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AND TO THE JUVENILLE COURT

LEGAL PHILANTHROPY

MISUSE OF OFFICE

INSTITUTIONAL CHILD ABUSE

LEGAL ABUSE

LAWYER MISCONDUCT

ETHNIC BIASNESS

MOCKERY

TRIAL ERROR

INTENTIONAL OMISSIONS

http://www.hinshawlaw.com/the- lawyers-lawyer-newsletter--- recent-developments-in-risk- management-03-09-2012/

Duty to report misconduct; code of conducthttps://www.facebook. com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/ pages/Duty-to-report- misconduct/136147606416830? fref=ts&rf=144393985578228

---------- Forwarded message ----------

From: Mary Sue Hamlet <mshamlet@twcny.rr.com>

Date: Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:03 AM

Subject: Re: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT COMPLAINT- PEER REPORTING -Attorney General's Office regarding Rule 84 of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct contains the following statements on attorney misconduct-18 USC Chapter 47 - FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS

To: Sheila Shaw <sdynastysheila@gmail.com>

Hello Sheila,

I spoke with you on the phone last week. I got another email, so I thought I would respond so you can see where it came from.

Please, please, please remove me from your assorted email lists.

Mary

On Jul 12, 2013, at 10:37 AM, Sheila Shaw wrote:

400 W. Robinson St. (Hurston South Tower) Ste. # S-509, Orlando, FL 32801-1718

http://www.hinshawlaw.com/the- lawyers-lawyer-newsletter--- recent-developments-in-risk- management-03-09-2012/

Duty to report misconduct; code of conducthttps://www.facebook. com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/ pages/Duty-to-report- misconduct/136147606416830? fref=ts&rf=144393985578228

( TORT LAW: A tort is a civil wrong resulting from a violation of a legal right not created by contract for which monetary redress is provided. This may be (a) an act or (b) an omission. More formally, a tort may be defined as a wrongful act or omission arising in the course of social re ships other than contracts which violates a person's legally protected rights for which the law provides a remedy in the form of an action for damages.

There are two basic classifications of torts: (a) negligence which is the result of an unintentional act (b) intentional acts or omissions which results in a breach of someone's rights. There is a third group in this area that should be explained. It is referred to as strict liability.)

8-2.241

Civil Laws Governing Law Enforcement Misconduct

Attorney Misconduct Complaint

THERE HAS BEEN A BREACH OF DUTY/NEGLECT OF DUTY WHEREAS ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION WOULD HAVE REMEDIED AN EXTENSIVE DELAY IN PROVIDING ADEQUATE CHILD SUPPORT OR FINANCIAL SUPPORT. IT IS ALSO MORE THAT SUSPECTED THAT THE UNTIMELY DELAYS AREASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING BREACH(ES)

400 W. Robinson St. (Hurston South Tower) Ste. # S-509, Orlando, FL 32801-1718

----- Forwarded Message -----

From: Sheila Shaw <nine09digits@yahoo.com>

To: "nc100bw@nc100bwcincinnati.org " <nc100bw@nc100bwcincinnati.org >; "Information@ChicagoNCBW.org" <Information@ChicagoNCBW.org>; "info@ncbwde.org" <info@ncbwde.org>; "info@ncbwmanhattan.org" <info@ncbwmanhattan.org>

Sent: Tuesday, July 2, 2013 2:33 PM