Knowledge of the fraud prior to continuance of the proceedings- which was not the case in the following proceedings nor thereafter when I contacted my attorney regarding ineffective counsel.
Barbara Tanner Jones & Tangel-Rodriguez & Associates 222 Weber St, Orlando, FL 32803 Bar Number: 391956 Mail Address: Tangel-Rodriguez & Assoc 222 Weber St Orlando, FL 32803-3831 United States Office: 407-849-1133 Cell: 407-849-1133
SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS MACKEY Heather Morcroft (Appellate Atty) 20 n Orange Ave Ste 700 Orlando 32801 FBN 0709859 407-325-3585 Attorney for Jarrid D. Williams Carlos Alberto Gonzalez Bar Number: 656755 Mail Address: Wayne Starr P.A. PO Box 560206 Orlando, FL 32856-0206 United States Office: 407-228-7280 Fax: 407-228-4296 Email: waynestarr@cfl.rr.com
Case# 482005DR014270A001OX) THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300 (KNOWLEDGE OF FRAUD AND INTENTIONAL OMISSION BY THE OTHER ATTYS - ". As an officer of the court, a lawyer cannot have his client perjure himself on the stand, that is, if that lawyer knows it is a lie. Otherwise, a lawyer would be perpetuating fraud upon the court. At that point, the lawyer is under an obligation to withdraw from the case (according to the rules of professional conduct). The lawyer is not required to divulge the reason for the withdrawal, in fact, it is improper to disclose such reasons due to attorney/client privilege but it would usually give the judge a good clue based on timing of the withdrawal. In short, a lawyer cannot stand by and watch the client lie to the court...."
Complaint (5617503201, FELICIA HANDLEY, ORANGE COUNTY, FL CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department
Federal laws Federal law 42 U.S.C. § 5772 & 42 U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5772) defines a "missing child" as "any individual less than 18 years of age whose whereabouts are unknown to such individual"s legal custodian
, that such a biasedness occurred it is described as unconscionably ethnically biased, a white collar criminal act by a party who misused his/her office to aid and assist avoidance of judicial action, that the action was in violation of the minor to case’s rights, that the action was in violation of parental rights to recovery of child support and paternity establishment in the Orange County, Ninth Judicial Circuit and Court, Division 42. Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:39 PM Subject: ATTORNEY GENERAL COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST Hershkowitz Russell S Attorney Category: Bankruptcy Law [Edit] 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 (407) 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com Thank you for contacting the Attorney General's Office regarding ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT . Our staff will process it as soon as possible and, if necessary, respond appropriately. We appreciate hearing from concerned citizens such as yourself. If you wish to keep abreast of the activities of this office, you may wish to consider a subscription to our electronic newsletter Weekly Briefing. Or perhaps our Consumer Alerts. Should you wish to subscribe to either, or both, publications, please visit our subscription page.
COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST
(Attorney for Carlos Gonzalez in child support proceedings.
Order for a judgement of "current" child support was entered by the judgement on DECEMBER 22, 2010. "RESERVING" ONCE AGAIN ARREARS ANT PAST DUE CHILD SUPPORT BY WHICH PATRRNITY WAS ESTABLISHED IN 2006 (A HISTORICAL DATA/RECORD OF UNCONCIONABLE DELAYS/PREVIOUSLY HEARD BY JUDICIAL MAGISTRATES, GEORGE WINSLO AND JUDGE ROCHE.)
ATTORNEY RUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire= Retained 407-786-2889( 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 (407) 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com
...CONTINUED ABUSE REGARDING INTENTIONAL REFUSAL TO SUPPORT THE CHILD OF WHICH PATERNITY HAD BEEN ESTABLISHED 5 (5 X 365 DAYS) IN THE CASE OF CARLOS GONZALEZ AND IN THE CASE OF JARRID DESHAUN WILLIAMS THAT P0ROCEEDING WERE ON THE JUDICIAL CALENDAR IN THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT WITH A WITHDRAWAL ON FEBRAURY 14TH 2011 (COINCIDENTALLY AFTER THE ISSUANCE OF A TEMPORARY MODIFICATION OF CHILD CUSTODY, COINCIDENTALLY AFTER A CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT TO THE FLORIDA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT BY CARLOS GONZALEZ IN JANUARY FOR THE MONTY OF JANUARY 2011, AFTER THE FINAL JUDGEMENT FOR A CURRENT SUPPORT ORDER HAD BEEN ISSUED DECEMBER 22ND, 2010) VIOLATIONS INCLUDE: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NON SUPPORT & CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY ACT VIOLATION(COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENTS- TITLE 42, FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW VIOLATIONS: REQUIREMENT OF STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED PROCEDURES ...
-- On Fri, 1/12/18, Sheila Shaw <nine09digits@yahoo.com> wrote:
> From: Sheila Shaw <nine09digits@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Fw: ATTN Shyann Elijah ESQ- I am interested in you reporting the fraud on the court, attorney deceit-and biased incidents failure to disclose & failure to consolidate family law cases, with the intent to defraud the court (grounds to void the judgement/vacate the judgement as I submitted to the family court-Rule 12.003 Coordination of Related Family Cases and Hearings
> To: "foundation@wif.org" <foundation@wif.org>, "Nywift Info" <info@nywift.org>, "Wif Info" <info@wif.org>, "wifdallas@yahoo.com" <wifdallas@yahoo.com>
> Date: Friday, January 12, 2018, 6:32 PM
>
>
> Sheila Jocelyn Shaw
> http://professsorshaw.blogspot.com/
>
>
> --- On Fri, 1/12/18, Sheila Shaw <nine09digits@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> > From: Sheila Shaw <nine09digits@yahoo.com>
> > Subject: ATTN Shyann Elijah ESQ- I
> am interested in you reporting the fraud on the court,
> attorney deceit-and biased incidents failure to disclose
> & failure to consolidate family law cases, with the
> intent to defraud the court (grounds to void the
> judgement/vacate the judgement as I submitted to the family
> court-Rule 12.003 Coordination of Related Family Cases and
> Hearings
> > To: Floridaattorney@gmail.com
> > Date: Friday, January 12, 2018,
> 11:19 AM
> > Atty deceit-Taner withdrew from an
> OCSE FL
> > DEPT REV CASE WITH COMMENTS
> ENTERED ON 2/15/2011 that
> > arrears were questionable when in
> fact departmental records
> > and FL 9TH DISTRICT LIDIA GARNER
> CLERK OF COURT RECORDS
> > MANAGEMENT HISTORICAL DATA
> CONTAINED ADVERSE ACCOUNTS OF ANY
> > QUESTIONABLE CHILD SUPPORT IN FACT
> LEGALLY STATED AND IN
> > ACCORD WITH TITLE 42 SECTIONS
> 654,655,657 social security
> > child support stipulations; Taner
> withdrew after fraud to
> > commence proceedings on 2/03/2011
> when FELICIA HANDLEY SENT
> > A DEPT EMAIL STATING THE MINOR TO
> CASE WAS MISSING A FALSE
> > STATEMENT MADE 1 DAY PRIOR TO FL
> DEPT CHILD SUPPORT UNIT WAS
> > TOLD TO ABATE OR IT WAS DOCUMENTED
> THA ABATED CHILD SUPPORT
> > PAYMENT MADE BY GONZALEZ WAS IN
> EFFECT PRIOR TO A TEMPORARY
> > ORDER FOR MODIFICATION OF CUSTODY
> WAS ISSUED THRU THE
> > DEPENDENCY COURT 9TH DISTRICT A
> MODIFICATION BASED ON FRAUD.
> > A SUBSEQUENT PETITION TO THE 9TH
> DISTRICT FAMILY COURT AS
> > INSTRUCTED WHERE FOLLOWUP
> PETITIONS WERE TO BE MADE-Petition
> > to vacate the judgement was denied
> after the judicial
> > magistrate held the petition, A
> MOCKERY OF PRIOR RESERVED
> > ACTIONS BY THE PRECEEDING JUDICIAL
> MAGISTRATES AND HEARING
> > OFFICERS, Roche and George
> Winslow, a repetited pattern of
> > reserving a current child support
> order had preceeding the
> > judgement made 12/22/2010-
> > a current support order was
> finally
> > issued on Michyl Shaw's case.
> Professional Standards
> > Complaint (s)- Fw: Atty Deceit
> Complaint/Dependency Fraud in
> > the court incidents ( Barbara
> Tanner Jones- Tangel-Rodriguez
> > & Associates 222 Weber St,
> Orlando, FL 32803 Case#
> > 482005DR014270A001OX) withdrew on
> February 15th, 2011
> > representation-(Where a lawyer
> learns of another lawyer’s
> > misconduct in the course of
> representing her client, and the
> > information about the misconduct
> constitutes a confidence or
> > secret within the meaning of Rule
> 1.6, that Rule prohibits
> > her reporting it without the
> client’s consent. If, after
> > having been made fully aware of
> any possible adverse
> > consequences for his ultimate
> recovery...) AFTER A FRAUD TO
> > COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS WAS INITIATED
> BY A FL DCF CPI-
> > TEMPORARY MODIFICATION WAS
> REQUESTED TO ABATE NOT ONLY CHILD
> > SUPPORT PAYMENT IN A CURRENT ORDER
> ISSUES DECEMBER 22ND,
> > 2010-TO ABATE LEGAL REPRESENTATION
> FROM THE GO DEPT OF
> > REVENUE BECAUSE THE DCF ATTORNEYS
> HAD NO INTENTION OF
> > CONSOLIDATING EXISTING FAMILY LAW
> CASES-RELATED CASES IN
> > ORDER TO DEFRAUD THE COURT -IN
> WHICH THE INITIAL ALLEGATION
> > WAS NEVER HEARD DURING PROCEEDINGS
> BETWEEN FEBRUARY 2011
> > THROUGH AUGUST 2011
> >
> >
> >
> > Public policy/White Collar
> Criminal
> > Acts/Attorney Misconduct involving
> racial profiling &
> > hate group harassment
> >
> >
> > FL CPI 5617503201
> >
> > False reporting that she knew
> would be
> > classified as a violent crime,
> would involve subsequent
> > legal causation including the
> P.R.O.T.E.C.T. Act which
> > is a PROSECUTORIAL TOOL
> INVESTIGATION AND MONITORING
> > COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE CHILDREN
> AND THE DADS.
> >
> > THAT WAS FEBRUARY OF 2011.
> > ALTHOUGH THE OFFICE OF THE
> INSPECTOR
> > GENERAL WITHIN THE FLORIDA DCF
> CONFIRMED NO PARTICIPATION
> > FROM FL DCF AGENTS (OFFICIALLY)
> OCCURRED AFTER THE
> > ADJUDICATED CASE CLOSURE AS OF
> AUGUST 2011, HARASSMENT AND
> > DEFAMATION CONTINUED AND
> ADDITIONAL FABRICATIONS BY PUBLIC
> > OFFICERS CONTINUED TO EXONERATE
> HANDLEY'S FALSE MISSING
> > CHILDREN'S/KIDNAPPING "STATEMENT"
> NOT CRIMINAL CHARGES SHE
> > WROTE UP ON A GOVERNMENT OFFICE
> FORM AND DOCUMENT
> > "DEPENDENCY ARRAIGNMENT " FORM,
> MISLEADING OTHERS THAT A
> > CRIMINAL ARRAIGNMENT HAD ENSUED OR
> THAT I WAS INVOLVED IN A
> > CRIME AGAINST CHILDREN CHARGE.
> FRAUD TO COMMENCE
> > PROCEEDINGS, INTENTIONAL ATTORNEY
> DECEIT FOR NONDISCLOSURE
> > OF THE FIRST PAGE INCLUDING THESE
> FRAUDULENT STATEMENTS TO
> > THE JUDGE, CONTINUING GENDER
> VIOLENCE/EXINTIMATE PARTNER
> > DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INVOLVING THE
> SAME PARTIES IN CONCURRENT
> > FAMILY LAW CASES IN THE SAME NINTH
> DISTRICT COURTS ANOTHER
> > DIVISIONS, PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING
> ALL PARTIES WERE ONGOING IN
> > DIVISIONS 7 & 38/42.
> > ON THE PUBLIC CLERK OF COURT
> REGISTRIES
> > AND FL DEPR REVENUE ATTY
> HISTORICAL DATA, INTENTIONALLY
> > UNCONSOLIDATED.
> >
> >
> > https://goo.gl/9U5P5k
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > There are circumstances where
> failure
> > to make a disclosure is the
> equivalent of an affirmative
> > misrepresentation. The obligation
> prescribed in Rule 1.2(d)
> > not to counsel a client to commit
> or assist the client in
> > committing a fraud applies in
> litigation. Regarding
> > compliance with Rule 1.2(d), see
> the Comment to that Rule.
> > See also the Comment to Rule
> 8.4(b).
> >
> >
> > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/06/9457320158-rfa-case-number-1143172973.html?m=1
> >
> >
> >
> > After WHICH a number of harassing
> > incidents and false claims were
> made during self help legal
> > filings, petitions and online
> computer research, online
> > filing and general use related to
> human rights including
> > employment, academic and
> correspondence with other family
> > members.
> >
> >
> > It is a crime for one or more
> persons
> > acting under color of law
> willfully to deprive or conspire
> > to deprive another person of any
> right protected by the
> > Constitution or laws of the United
> States. (18 U.S.C. §§
> > 241, 242)
> >
> >
> > Here I posted a document entitled
> ORDER
> > OF ARRAIGNMENT FOR JUVENILE
> DEPENDENCY HEARING in the
> > foregoing link, whereas the CPI
> representing FL DCF CHILD
> > PROTECTION AND CHILDREN'S LEGAL
> SERVICES alleged my children
> > were missing - implying that they
> were at some point in the
> > custody of someone other than
> their mother who was in family
> > court proceedings against the
> paternal dads, who which by
> > the way she kept making up excuses
> to call the dads and
> > temporary allow them custody
> despite them being adverse
> > court adversaries.
> > Such as on January 27th, 2011
> Felicia
> > Handley, CPI # , made up or
> fabricated an excuse for an
> > overnight stay with the dads, the
> proceedings were dismissed
> > by Judge Anthony Johnson on
> 1/28/2011 ONE DAY PRIOR TO MY
> > DAUGHTERS'S FOURTH BIRTHDAY
> 01/29/2011. HARASSMENT OR
> > PERPETUATED DOMESTIC VIOLENCE THRU
> MISUSE OF OFFICE.
> > WHAT JUDGE DO YOU KNOW DOES NOT
> ADDRESS
> > THE ALLEGATION IN HEARINGS HELD
> BETWEEN FEBRUARY 2011 THRU
> > AUGUST 30TH, 2011- THIS CASE
> COMMENCED ON FRAUD AND ALL THE
> > ATTORNEYS INVOLVED HAD THE FIRST
> PAGE OF THE ARRAIGNMENT
> > & NEVER SAID ONE WORD
> THROUGHOUT THE HEARINGS BUT
> > CONTINUED TO FABRICATE AN EXCUSE
> INCLUDING QUESTIONING MY
> > MATRICULATION THROUGH EVEREST
> UNIVERSITY- ORLANDO NORTH -
> > ORLANDO, FLORIDA & CORLLINS
> UNIVERSITY, STOCKTON,
> > CA.RECENT MATRICULATED PROGRAMS
> AT THE TIME OF HER
> > ALLEGATIONS WHICH WERE REPORTED TO
> EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
> > DIVISION OF THE US DEPT OF JUSTICE
> AS A HATE CRIME, GENDER
> > VIOLENCE.
> > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/04/fraud-rule-33-candor-toward-tribunal.html
> > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/05/cc-judicial-misconduct-judicial_23.html
> > https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/judicialethics/resources/TPL_jethics_internet.authcheckdam.pdf
> > HANDLEY KNEW THE PROCEDURE WELL AS
> IN
> > ANY BAILOR/BAILEE OR DUTY OF CARE
> - ROUTINE PROCEDURES THEY
> > DO EVERYDAY -AS WELL AS THE
> DEPENDENCY GAL PARTICIPANTS
> > DORIS MACKEY & DCF ATTYS WHO
> NEVER CONSOLIDATED RELATED
> > CASES-REQUIRED
> >
> >
> > PART ONE (See Page 1, PART ONE -
> > Complainant Information.):
> Complaint Details Legal Cause and
> > Tortious Injury (As a result of
> the fraudulent
> > acts/omissions, and deceit by
> attorney and departmental
> > employee whereas deprivation of
> rights involved those rights
> > of the minors and the natural
> parent and mother) *FRAUD ON
> > THE COURT TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS
> On the part of the
> > attorney herein and afore
> mentioned in proceedings: Duty to
> > report misconduct; code of
> >
> conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228
> > THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER
> ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651
> > EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE,
> FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON
> > THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA
> JOCELYN SHAW PARTY TO THE
> > COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S)
> PART TWO (See Page 1,
> > PART TWO - Attorney Information
> FLORIDA BAR MEMBER(S):
> > SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR
> ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD
> > LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498
> AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC
> > TIBON DORIS MACKEY GAL- PART T H R
> E E (See Page 1, PART T H
> > R E E - Facts/Allegations.): The
> specific thing or things I
> > am complaining about are: (attach
> additional sheets as
> > necessary) "Fraud. Rule 3.3 Candor
> Toward The Tribunal -
> > Comment [1] This Rule governs the
> conduct of a lawyer who is
> > representing a client in the
> proceedings of a tribunal. See
> > Rule 1.0(m) for the definition of
> "tribunal." It also
> > applies when the lawyer is
> representing a client in an
> > ancillary proceeding conducted
> pursuant to the tribunal’s
> > adjudicative authority, such as a
> deposition. Thus, for
> > example, paragraph (a)(3) requires
> a lawyer to take
> > reasonable remedial measures if
> the lawyer comes to know
> > that a client who is testifying in
> a deposition has offered
> > evidence that is false. [2] This
> Rule sets forth the special
> > duties of lawyers as officers of
> the court to avoid conduct
> > that undermines the integrity of
> the adjudicative process. A
> > lawyer acting as an advocate in an
> adjudicative proceeding
> > has an obligation to present the
> client's case with
> > persuasive force. Performance of
> that duty while maintaining
> > confidences of the client,
> however, is qualified by the
> > advocate's duty of candor to the
> tribunal. Consequently,
> > although a lawyer in an adversary
> proceeding is not required
> > to present an impartial exposition
> of the law or to vouch
> > for the evidence submitted in a
> cause, the lawyer must not
> > allow the tribunal to be misled by
> false statements of law
> > or fact or evidence that the
> lawyer knows to be false."
> > State employee misconduct which
> resulted in material
> > injuries and legal causation:
> *Police stalking. Conspired
> > with FL DCF STATE EMPLOYEE
> EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT, CPI NUMBER
> > 5617503201 http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/?m=1
> > 9457320158 (RFA CASE NUMBER
> 1143172973) insurance
> > covering dental/medical Dr. Obeori
> & Dr.Nau (Michyl,
> > Isis) http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/02/httpflcertificationboardorg.html?m=1
> > Firm associated with complaint.
> Interstate stalking and
> > trespassing related to a divorcee
> case. Hershkowitz Russell
> > S Attorney : Fw: ADMINISTRATIVE
> 92-1; In all family law
> > cases in which a trial is
> anticipated, the attorney shall
> > submit a notice that the cause is
> at issue.- intentional
> > omissions; w: Mr. Williams is
> refusing visitation with the
> > minor contrary to the oral
> & written child
> > visitation with Atty Wayne Starr
> at the last hearing
> > 8/30/2011- subsequent modification
> petitions have been
> > submitted resulting in excuses by
> court administration,
> > lastly stating a parental
> responsibility packet is needed-
> > THERE IS NO PRESUMPTIVE FATHERHOOD
> STATUE APPLICABLE, UNWED
> > AT BIRTH AND CISTODY BTW 2007 THRU
> 2011 WAS WITH THE
> > MOTHERHOOD. THERE IS NO CHANCE OF
> RESOLUTION OF ANY INTIMATE
> > PARTNER RELATIONSHIP &
> WILLIAMS AND SEVERAL OF HIS
> > FAMILY TIES HAVE REPEATED ENGAGED
> IN OFFENSIVE BEHAVIOURS
> > AND PROPERTY THEFTS MONETARY
> CLAIMS PRECEEDING THE ACTUAL
> > JUDGEMENT FOR SUPPORT Fw: Court
> Administration employee
> > misconduct/judicial misconduct-
> unconscionable delays
> > & biased proceedings,
> concealed concurtent criminal
> > proceeding involving Jarrid
> Williams 2/2011/ continuing
> > domestic violence& abuse
> of the child support order
> > by law enforcement personnel ,
> domestic violence > To: info@idvaac.org
> > > Cc: "judicial misconduct" ,
> "judicial misconduct" ,
> > "judicial misconduct" , "judicial
> misconduct" , "judicial
> > misconduct" , "judicial
> misconduct" , "judicial misconduct"
> > , "judicial misconduct" ,
> "judicial misconduct" , "judicial
> > misconduct" , "judicial
> misconduct" , "judicial misconduct"
> > , "judicial misconduct" ,
> "judicial misconduct" , "judicial
> > misconduct" , "judicial" ,
> "Judicial" , "Judicial Committee"
> > > Date: Friday, March 17, 2017,
> 8:25 PM omissions:
> > unconsolidated cases/related cases
> whereas information
> > therein would substantially affect
> those involved such as
> > that of concurrent criminal
> nonsupport proceedings against
> > the plaintiff/paternal fathers to
> case- as indicative on the
> > Lidia Gardner Clerk of Court
> Registries http://icpcstatepages.org/florida/criminalbackground/
> > 39.0138 Criminal history and
> other records checks;
> > limit on placement of a child—
> (1) The department shall
> > conduct a records check through
> the State Automated Child
> > Welfare Information System
> (SACWIS) and a local and
> > statewide criminal history records
> check on all persons,
> > including parents, being
> considered by the department for
> > placement of a child under this
> chapter, including all
> > non-relative placement decisions,
> and all members of the
> > household, 12 years of age and
> older, of the person being
> > considered. For purposes of this
> section, a criminal history
> > records check may include, but is
> not limited to, submission
> > of fingerprints to the Department
> of Law Enforcement for
> > processing and forwarding to the
> Federal Bureau of
> > Investigation for state and
> national criminal history
> > information, and local criminal
> records checks through local
> > law enforcement agencies of all
> household members 18 years
> > of age and older and other
> visitors to the home. An
> > out-of-state criminal history
> records check must be
> > initiated for any person 18 years
> of age or older who
> > resided in another state if that
> state allows the release of
> > such records. The department shall
> establish by rule
> > standards for evaluating any
> information contained in the
> > automated system relating to a
> person who must be screened
> > for purposes of making a placement
> decision. 1. Chapter
> > 560, relating to the Money
> Transmitters’ Code.
> > 2. Chapter 812, relating to
> theft, robbery, and related
> > crimes. 3. Chapter 815, relating
> to computer-related
> > crimes. 4. Chapter 817, relating
> to fraudulent practices.
> > 5. Chapter 825, relating to
> abuse, neglect, and
> > exploitation of elderly persons
> and disabled adults.
> > 6. Chapter 831, relating to
> forgery and counterfeiting.
> > 7. Chapter 832, relating to the
> issuance of worthless
> > checks and drafts. 8. Chapter
> 838, relating to bribery and
> > misuse of public office.
> 9. Chapter 839, relating to
> > offenses by public officers and
> employees. 10. Chapter
> > 895, relating to offenses
> concerning racketeering and
> > illegal debts. 11. Chapter 896,
> relating to offenses
> > related to financial transactions.
> (b) A felony offense
> > that is committed with intent to
> defraud or that involves a
> > conspiracy to defraud. (c) A
> felony offense that is
> > committed with intent to
> temporarily or permanently deprive
> > a person of his or her property or
> that involves a
> > conspiracy to temporarily or
> permanently deprive a person of
> > his or her property. (d) A
> felony offense that involves or
> > results in the commission of fraud
> or deceit upon a person
> > or that involves a conspiracy to
> commit fraud or deceit upon
> > a person. (4) As used in this
> section, “aggravated white
> > collar crime” means engaging in
> at least two white collar
> > crimes that have the same or
> similar intents, results,
> > accomplices, victims, or methods
> of commission, or that are
> > otherwise interrelated by
> distinguishing characteristics and
> > are not isolated incidents,
> provided that at least one of
> > such crimes occurred after the
> effective date of this act.
> > (5) Any person who commits an
> aggravated white collar
> > crime as defined in this section
> and in so doing either:
> > (a) Victimizes 10 or more
> elderly persons, as defined in
> > s. 825.101; (b) Victimizes 20 or
> more persons, as defined
> > in s. 1.01; or (c) Victimizes
> the State of Florida, any
> > state agency, any of the state’s
> political subdivisions,
> > or any agency of the state’s
> political subdivisions, and
> > thereby obtains or attempts to
> obtain $50,000 or more,
> > commits a felony of the first
> degree, punishable as provided
> > in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s.
> 775.084. *concurrent court
> > proceedings FL DCF KNEW ABOUT
> :NINTH DISTRICT HISTORICAL
> > DATA DIV 38/42 PRECEEDING CLAIM BY
> DCF CPI FELICIA HANDLEY
> > 2005DR14270 08-24-2004 Petition
> for paternity entered
> > Service denied 09-24-2004 Petition
> to establish paternity
> > denied Respondent petitioned to
> dismiss paternity 11-08-2004
> > 05-05-2006 Final judgment granted
> on paternity 10-19-2010
> > Final judgment for child support
> entered 10-22-2010 Order
> > for income deduction 11-29-2010
> Notice of change of address
> > 12-28-2010 Petition heard to
> establish child support
> > 01-14-2011 Returned mail
> 01-04-2011 Motion to set arrears
> > entered 01-04-2011 Notice and
> hearing 02-14-2011 Hearing to
> > set arrears 01/28/2011 Plaintiff
> petitions for the need for
> > custody denied 02/04/2011 THE
> SPECIFIC THING OR THINGS I AM
> > COMPLAINING ABOUT ARE: 18 U.S.C.
> §§ 241, 242). "Color of
> > law" simply means that the person
> doing the act is using
> > power given to him or her by a
> governmental agency (local,
> > State, or Federal). A law
> enforcement officer acts "under
> > color of law" even if he or she is
> exceeding his or her
> > rightful power. THAT ON THE ONSET
> OF PROCEEDINGS DATED
> > 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA SHAW, AS
> THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE
> > DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION 7,
> ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT:
> > Juvenile Division 2000 E. Michigan
> St.Suite 300 Orlando, FL
> > 32806 PROCEEDINGS (WAIVED NOTICE
> OF OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD
> > TO BE IN WRITING- WAIVED BY THE
> JUDGE) WERE COMMENCED
> > WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE
> PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE
> > HISTORICAL DATA AND CONCURRENT
> CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS, AND
> > HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS
> CONCURRENTLY PUBLISHED IN DIVISION
> > 42 COURT, VIA CLERK OF THE ORANGE
> COUNTY CLERK OF COURT,
> > MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE RECORDS
> MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE
> > RISS DATABASE, THE DEPARTMENT OF
> CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR
> > ACCOUNTS OF INTERAGENCY ACCESS
> WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
> > OF REVENUE. THE COMPLAINANT MAKES
> REFERENCE THAT THE
> > ATTORNEY’S, WITH KNOWLEDGE,
> ACTED IN A DECEITFUL MANNER,
> > NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION FOR THE
> PURPOSE OF FRAUD RELATIVE
> > TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF JUDICIAL
> PROCEEDINGS. *Duty to report
> > misconduct; code of
> >
> conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228
> > THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER
> ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651
> > EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE,
> FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON
> > THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA
> JOCELYN SHAW PARTY TO THE
> > COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S)
> 1. Chapter 560,
> > relating to the Money
> Transmitters’ Code. 2. Chapter
> > 812, relating to theft, robbery,
> and related crimes.
> > 3. Chapter 815, relating to
> computer-related crimes.
> > 4. Chapter 817, relating to
> fraudulent practices.
> > 5. Chapter 825, relating to
> abuse, neglect, and
> > exploitation of elderly persons
> and disabled adults.
> > 6. Chapter 831, relating to
> forgery and counterfeiting.
> > 7. Chapter 832, relating to the
> issuance of worthless
> > checks and drafts. 8. Chapter
> 838, relating to bribery and
> > misuse of public office.
> 9. Chapter 839, relating to
> > offenses by public officers and
> employees. 10. Chapter
> > 895, relating to offenses
> concerning racketeering and
> > illegal debts. 11. Chapter 896,
> relating to offenses
> > related to financial transactions.
> (b) A felony offense
> > that is committed with intent to
> defraud or that involves a
> > conspiracy to defraud. (c) A
> felony offense that is
> > committed with intent to
> temporarily or permanently deprive
> > a person of his or her property or
> that involves a
> > conspiracy to temporarily or
> permanently deprive a person of
> > his or her property. (d) A
> felony offense that involves or
> > results in the commission of fraud
> or deceit upon a person
> > or that involves a conspiracy to
> commit fraud or deceit upon
> > a person. (4) As used in this
> section, “aggravated white
> > collar crime” means engaging in
> at least two white collar
> > crimes that have the same or
> similar intents, results,
> > accomplices, victims, or methods
> of commission, or that are
> > otherwise interrelated by
> distinguishing characteristics and
> > are not isolated incidents,
> provided that at least one of
> > such crimes occurred after the
> effective date of this act.
> > (5) Any person who commits an
> aggravated white collar
> > crime as defined in this section
> and in so doing either:
> > (a) Victimizes 10 or more
> elderly persons, as defined in
> > s. 825.101; (b) Victimizes 20 or
> more persons, as defined
> > in s. 1.01; or (c) Victimizes
> the State of Florida, any
> > state agency, any of the state’s
> political subdivisions,
> > or any agency of the state’s
> political subdivisions, and
> > thereby obtains or attempts to
> obtain $50,000 or more,
> > commits a felony of the first
> degree, punishable as provided
> > in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s.
> 775.084. ACAP BAR COMPLAINT
> > DETAILS/PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS
> VIOLATIONS. Fw: EMPLOYEE
> > MISCOND KUCT (hate crimes,
> continuing domestic violence
> > after breaking up with Williams)
> CF180-4 ( per your
> > publication, the SCOPE of
> guidelines, goverance of employee
> > ethical and professional conduct
> states: “Fraud” means
> > to commit an intentional violation
> of law or a deliberate
> > misrepresentation or concealment
> so as to secure unfair or
> > unlawful financial or personal
> gain.) In this case whereas
> > fraud in the manner and form
> constituting DOMESTIC VIOLENCE,
> > PUBLIC OFFICER/ATTORNEY DECEIT,
> COLLUSION, that he/she did
> > KNOWINGLY WITH INTENT TO COMMIT
> AGGRAVATED (COMPOUNDED)
> > SEMITIC HATE, ETHNICALLY BIASED
> CRIMINAL TORTS, DURESS AND
> > EMOTIONAL ABUSE AND ALIENATION TO
> THE MOTHER WHO WAS ALREADY
> > A VICTIM OF ABUSE OF DOMESTIC
> VIOLENCE IN THE MANNER AND
> > FORMS OF EXINTIMATE PARTNER &
> FAMILY VIOLENCE,
> > PERSONALITY TORTS AND FRAUD TO
> COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS, AND
> > DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RELATED TO
> PRECEEDING ASCERTAINMENT
> > PURSUITS THROUGH ADMINISTRATIVE
> AND JUDICIAL ACTIONS WHICH
> > WERE INTENTIONALLY AND
> "SELECTIVELY" BIASED IN APPLICATION
> > OF THE LAWS BOTH FEDERAL AND STATE
> STATUTORY APPLICATION TO
> > CHILD CUSTODY, CHILD SUPPORT
> COLLECTION, RECOVERY AND
> > DISBURSEMENT, WITH AN ACT OF
> VIOLENCE OCCURRING FEBRUARY 4TH
> > 2011 IN THE ABATEMENT OF CHILD
> DUPPORT FROM THE PRECEEDING
> > MONTH OF COLLECTION JANUARY 2011,
> AFTER JUDGEMENT REIDERED
> > ON DECEMBER 22ND, 2010 LESS THAN
> 60(SIXTY DAYS) THAT
> > EMPLOYEE KNOWLEDGE THRU THE RISS
> INFORMATION SHARING SYSTEM
> > PROMPTED MALICIOUS, RETALIATORY
> STATEMENT TO INTERFER WITH
> > FL SDU DISBURSEMENT, REVERSING THE
> JANUARY PAYMENT AFTER
> > FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDING ONSET
> AGAIN AFTER AN EARLY
> > DISMISSAL ON JANUARY 28TH, 2011,
> BOTH OF WHICH INITIAL CLAIM
> > WERE OMITTED DUE TO EMPLOYEE
> FRAUD/MISCONDUCT
> >
> >
> > White Collar Fraud participant.
> Program
> > abuse/court record omissions
> imposed a biased prejudice in
> > judicial proceedings, concealment
> of criminal nonsupport
> > histories of the payernal dad and
> domestic violence against
> > the mother, natural parent. Ethnic
> intimidation on false
> > allegations of kidnapping based on
> program employee
> > misconduct involing Orange County
> Sheriff employee
> > misconduct, family violence
> personality torts. The mother
> > has no criminal history
> constituting violent crimes or
> > kidnapping/missing children
> criminal charges nor child abuse
> > as alleged personality torts were
> used to slander and defame
> > the mother by the paternal dad's
> familt ties working in law
> > enforcement. The incident involves
> retaliatory harassment
> > related to a family violence
> situation in another state and
> > county in which the paternal dad
> alleged that the mother's
> > daughter was a participant in
> parental alienation and
> > divorcee proceedings. Harassment
> that was setup through
> > family ties wirking in
> administrative venue. Complaint
> > involves neglience, FL DCF
> employee violations of
> > administrative policies wherein it
> is clearly defined what
> > constitutes employee misconduct,
> fraud. All parties knew of
> > procedure based upon "duty of
> care", the greater
> > responsibilty in reporting
> misconduct was tge responsibilty
> > of the other employees and
> attorneys who routinely handle
> > cases and are subject to
> administrative policies, statutory
> > obligations and professional
> responsibilities under model
> > policies of domestic violence,
> juvenile courts, FL DCF
> > employee handbook code of conduct
> and which representation
> > is suppose to enforce a fair and
> equal protection under the
> > law. CF180-4 Complaint against:
> Devereux Florida Foster Care
> > Program Orange/Osceola/Seminole
> County 5749 Westgate Drive,
> > Suite 102 ~ Orlando, FL 32835
> Phone: 321.441.1567 Fax:
> > 321.281.3887 PERSONALITY TORTS
> TORTS OF FRAUD TO DEFAME
> > CHARACTER OF THE MOTHER AS
> DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PERPETUATED BY
> > STATE EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT, CPI
> NUMBER 5617503201; Fw: Fwd:
> > ATTACHED AFFIDAVIT ON DATE OF
> FALSE ALLEGATION BY CPI-ETHNIC
> > BIASNESS/RACIAL PROFILING
> COMPLAINT;Fw: CPI 5617503201
> > EMERGENCY RESPONSE FALSE COMPLAINT
> SUBMITTED TO LAW
> > ENFORCEMENT REGARDING CHILD
> CUSTODY - THE NATURAL PARENT,
> > MOTHER HAD CUSTODY resubmitted the
> ACAP CONSUMER ASSISTANCE
> > COMPLAINT/ACAP ATTY COMPLAINT/
> INQUIRY/COMPLAINT
> > FORM/INTENTIONALLY OMITTED
> FRAUDULENT STATEMENT , fraud and
> > white collar criminal behavior
> 39.0141 A Missing Children
> > Report is Required and is found to
> be absent in all
> > proceedings prior to date. &
> 95.11 Tort actions for
> > fraud or assault
> &39.0014,39.0141 MISSING CHILDRENS
> > REPORT REQUIRED TO: CC / BCC:
> FROM: SUBJECT: Fw:
> > resubmitted the ACAP CONSUMER
> ASSISTANCE COMPLAINT/ACAP ATTY
> > COMPLAINT/ INQUIRY/COMPLAINT
> FORM/INTENTIONALLY OMITTED
> > FRAUDULENT STATEMENT , fraud and
> white collar criminal
> > behavior 39.0141 A Missing
> Children Report is Required and
> > is found to be absent in all
> proceedings prior to date.
> > & 95.11 Tort actions for fraud
> or assault
> > &39.0014,39.0141 MISSING
> CHILDRENS REPORT REQUIRED
> > Choose File Original Message On
> Jan 9, 2017, at 9:30 AM,
> > Sheila Shaw wrote: From: Sheila
> Shaw ; To: Nine09digits ;
> > Sheila Jocelyn ; Subject:
> resubmitted the ACAP CONSUMER
> > ASSISTANCE COMPLAINT/ACAP ATTY
> COMPLAINT/ INQUIRY/COMPLAINT
> > FORM Sent: Fri, Jan 6, 2017
> 9:39:00 PM ACAP ATTY COMPLAINT/
> > INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM THE FLORIDA
> BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER
> > ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST
> JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE,
> > FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON THIS 5TH DAY
> OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA
> > JOCELYN SHAW 863 EAST WESTMORELAND
> ST. PHILADELPHIA, PA
> > 19134 (PREVIOUS ADDRESS OF WHICH
> COMPLAINT WAS SUBMITTED:PO
> > BOX 5147, TAMPA, FLORIDA
> 33657-5175) FRAUD ON THE COURT TO
> > COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS
> INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM ATTACHED
> > DOCUMENT TO THE FLORIDA BAR PARTY
> TO THE COMPLAINT: AGAINST
> > THE ATTORNEY(S) FLORIDA BAR
> MEMBER(S): SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ
> > 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS
> GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA
> > HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN
> 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS
> > MACKEY GAL- Ana Elena
> Tangel-Rodriguez Eligible to Practice
> > Law in Florida Bar Number: 254304
> Mail
> > Address:Tangel-Rodriguez and
> Associates Tangel-Rodriguez
> > & Assoc 222 Weber St Orlando,
> FL 32803-3831 United
> > States Office: 407-849-1133
> Email:cselsp@att.net
> > Personal Bar URL:
> www.floridabar.org/mybarprofile/254304
> > RUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ,
> Esquire= Retained 407-786-2889(
> > 1110 Douglas > Ave >
> Altamonte Springs, FL> 32714
> > > (407)> 786-2889 > http://www.russellhlaw.com THE SPECIFIC THING OR
> THINGS
> > I AM COMPLAINING ABOUT ARE: 18
> U.S.C. §§ 241, 242). "Color
> > of law" simply means that the
> person doing the act is using
> > power given to him or her by a
> governmental agency (local,
> > State, or Federal). A law
> enforcement officer acts "under
> > color of law" even if he or she is
> exceeding his or her
> > rightful power. THAT ON THE ONSET
> OF PROCEEDINGS DATED
> > 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA SHAW, AS
> THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE
> > DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION 7,
> ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT:
> > Juvenile Division 2000 E. Michigan
> St.Suite 300 Orlando, FL
> > 32806 PROCEEDINGS (WAIVED NOTICE
> OF OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD
> > TO BE IN WRITING- WAIVED BY THE
> JUDGE) WERE COMMENCED
> > WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE
> PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE
> > HISTORICAL DATA AND CONCURRENT
> CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS, AND
> > HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS
> CONCURRENTLY PUBLISHED IN DIVISION
> > 42 COURT, VIA CLERK OF THE ORANGE
> COUNTY CLERK OF COURT,
> > MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE RECORDS
> MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE
> > RISS DATABASE, THE DEPARTMENT OF
> CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR
> > ACCOUNTS OF INTERAGENCY ACCESS
> WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
> > OF REVENUE. THE COMPLAINANT MAKES
> REFERENCE THAT THE
> > ATTORNEY’S, WITH KNOWLEDGE,
> ACTED IN A DECEITFUL MANNER,
> > NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION FOR THE
> PURPOSE OF FRAUD RELATIVE
> > TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF JUDICIAL
> PROCEEDINGS. Fraud Title 42,
> > U.S.C., Section 14141: makes it
> unlawful for state or local
> > law enforcement agencies to allow
> officers to engage in a
> > pattern or practice of conduct
> that deprives persons of
> > rights protected by the
> Constitution or laws of the United
> > States. This law is commonly
> referred to as the Police
> > Misconduct Statute. the exintimate
> partner and public
> > officer employee misconduct
> BUSINESS TORT
> > RELATED-ADVERSARIAL TORTS OR
> MATERNAL INJURIES WITH INTENT
> > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer_29.html
> > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/any-police-department-receiving-federal.html
> > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/family-violence-prevention-act-victim.html
> > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/false-cpi-personal-torts-tort-of-fraud.html
> > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/jarrid-williams-probation-dc-346801.html
> > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/201
> > Federal laws Federal law 42 U.S.C.
> § 5772 & 42
> > U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law (42
> U.S.C. § 5772) defines a
> > "missing child" as "any individual
> less than 18 years of age
> > whose whereabouts are unknown to
> such individual"s legal
> > custodian." RE: CF OPERATING
> PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI,
> > PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD
> Section 39.205, Florida
> > Statutes (F.S.) states what the
> department has to do
> > concerning false reporting for
> children and Section 415.111,
> > F.S. addresses with false
> reporting for adults. "ESSENTIAL
> > REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW WERE
> DIVESTED AND SUBSEQUENT LEGAL
> > CAUSATION INCLUSIVE OF : 1. A
> MATERIAL INJURY IN THE
> > PROCEEDINGS BELOW THAT CANNOT BE
> CONCLUDED ON POST JUDGEMENT
> > APPEAL,2. INJURY WAS CAUSED BY A
> DEPARTURE FORM THE
> > ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW
> (WHEN THEY ARE VIOLATED)
> > OCCURRED. IMPROPER PURPOSE USED TO
> ACCESS TO THE
> > FACILITY/HARASSMENT & TORTS)
> CONTINUATION OF
> > PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT Fw:
> REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE
> > ACTION TO REOPEN CASE CASE NO
> 2005-DR-014270-O DIVISION 42;
> > Fw: ATTN KEITH PARKS Action
> founded on negligence, fraud and
> > white collar criminal behavior
> 39.0141 A Missing Children
> > Report is Required and is found to
> be absent in all
> > proceedings prior to date. &
> 95.11 Tort actions for
> > fraud or assault &
> 39.0014,39.0141 MISSING CHILDRENS
> > REPORT REQUIRED WHICH IN ITS
> ABSENCE AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF
> > PROCEEDINGS CONSTITUTES FRAUD.
> TORT ACTIONS OF FRAUD
> > INCLUSIVE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND
> VAWA BY THE FATHERS TO
> > CASE WHO KNEW THE ALLEGATIONS WERE
> FALSE THE ATTORNEY’S TO
> > CASE DID NOT CONSOLIDATE THE TWO
> DIVISIONS, DIVISION 7 AND
> > DIVISION 42, WITH KNOWLEDGE THAT A
> “THRESHOLD OF
> > DEMONSTRATIVE SHOWING OF FINANCIAL
> SUPPORT” IN ADDITION TO
> > THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A
> RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CHILD WOULD BE
> > NECESSARY UNDER PROVISIONS
> OUTLINED REGARDING MINORS TO
> > JUVENILE DEPENDENCY COURT CIVIL
> RULES OF PRACTICE, FLORIDA
> > STATUTES CHAPTER 39. PROCEEDINGS
> RELATING TO CHILDREN THE
> > DEVASTATION FROM THE PRESIDING
> RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL
> > PROCESS ALONG WITH THE STANDARDS
> OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT,
> > ATTORNEY DECEIT INCLUDED THE
> FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS: §
> > 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. Civil
> contempt is conduct directed
> > against the rights of the opposing
> party law-imposed
> > obligation ;"an act or omission
> tending to obstruct or
> > interfere with the orderly
> administration of justice, or to
> > impair the dignity of the court or
> respect for its
> > authority. There are two kinds,
> direct and constructive."
> > 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct
> contempt openly and in the
> > presence of the court, resists the
> power of the court, 102
> > A. 400, 406; and consequential, or
> constructive contempt
> > results from matters outside the
> court, such as failure to
> > comply with orders. The basic
> standards governing fraud on
> > the court are reasonably
> straightforward. As set forth in
> > Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 47
> (Fla. 5th DCA 1998): The
> > requisite fraud on the court
> occurs where “it can be
> > demonstrated, clearly and
> convincingly, that a party has
> > sentiently set in motion some
> unconscionable scheme
> > calculated to interfere with the
> judicial system’s ability
> > impartially to adjudicate a matter
> by improperly influencing
> > the trier of fact or unfairly
> hampering the presentation of
> > the opposing party’s claim or
> defense.” Aoude v. Mobil
> > Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118
> (1st Cir. 1989) . . . . The
> > trial court has the inherent
> authority, within the exercise
> > of sound judicial discretion, to
> dismiss an action when a
> > plaintiff has perpetrated a fraud
> on the court, or where a
> > party refuses to comply with court
> orders. Kornblum v.
> > Schneider, 609 So. 2d 138, 139
> (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).
> > CONCURRENT PROCEEDINGS THAT POSED
> A BIAS IN SUBSEQUENT CHILD
> > CUSTODY PROCEEDINGS IN THE
> JUVENILLE COURT 7TH DISTRICT
> > ORANGE COUNTY COURTS Duty to
> report misconduct; code of
> >
> conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228
> > THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER
> ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651
> > EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE,
> FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON
> > THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA
> JOCELYN SHAW PARTY TO THE
> > COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S)
> FLORIDA BAR MEMBER(S):
> > SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR
> ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD
> > LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498
> AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC
> > TIBON DORIS MACKEY GAL- “IN THE
> BEST INTERESTS OFTHE
> > CHILD”, THE CHILD HAS THE RIGHT
> TO EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER
> > THE LAW/WHEREAS THE OMISSIONS
> RELATIVE TO THE CASE
> > PROCEEDINGS PRESENTED A BIAS AND
> NONDISCLOSURE OF EXISTING
> > DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CONCURRENT WITH
> PROCEEDINGS WHICH AFFECTED
> > THE CHILD, THE ECONOMIC
> DIVESTATION FROM FINANCIAL SUPPORT,
> > LEGALLY DEFINED WITHIN THE MODEL
> POLICY OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
> > THAT THERE EXISTS ECONOMIC TORTS
> AND ABUSE REGARDING
> > INTENTIONAL REFUSAL TO SUPPORT THE
> CHILD OF WHICH PATERNITY
> > HAD BEEN ESTABLISHED 5 (5 X 365
> DAYS) IN THE CASE OF CARLOS
> > GONZALEZ AND IN THE CASE OF JARRID
> DESHAUN WILLIAMS THAT
> > P0ROCEEDING WERE ON THE JUDICIAL
> CALENDAR IN THE NINTH
> > DISTRICT COURT WITH A WITHDRAWAL
> ON FEBRAURY 14TH 2011
> > (COINCIDENTALLY AFTER THE ISSUANCE
> OF A TEMPORARY
> > MODIFICATION OF CHILD CUSTODY,
> COINCIDENTALLY AFTER A CHILD
> > SUPPORT PAYMENT TO THE FLORIDA
> STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT BY
> > CARLOS GONZALEZ IN JANUARY FOR THE
> MONTY OF JANUARY 2011,
> > AFTER THE FINAL JUDGEMENT FOR A
> CURRENT SUPPORT ORDER HAD
> > BEEN ISSUED DECEMBER 22ND, 2010)
> VIOLATIONS INCLUDE:
> > ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING
> CRIMINAL NON SUPPORT &
> > CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY ACT
> VIOLATION(COLLECTION AND
> > DISTRIBUTION OF CHILD SUPPORT
> PAYMENTS- TITLE 42, FEDERAL
> > CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION LAWS,
> SOCIAL SECURITY ACT
> > 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING
> JUDICIAL
> > MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW
> VIOLATIONS: REQUIREMENT OF
> > STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED PROCEDURES
> TO IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS
> > OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT Sec.
> 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] (a)
> > In order to satisfy section
> 454(20)(A), each State must have
> > in effect laws requiring the use
> of the following
> > procedures, consistent with this
> section and with
> > regulations of the Secretary, to
> increase the effectiveness
> > of the program which the State
> administers under this part:
> > Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] (a (C)
> Voluntary paternity
> > acknowledgment.— (iv) Use of
> paternity acknowledgment
> > affidavit. —Such procedures must
> require the State to
> > develop and use an affidavit for
> the voluntary
> > acknowledgment of paternity which
> includes the minimum
> > requirements of the affidavit
> specified by the Secretary
> > under section 452(a)(7) for the
> voluntary acknowledgment of
> > paternity, and to give full faith
> and credit to such an
> > affidavit signed in any other
> State according to its
> > procedures. Heather Morcroft
> (Appellate Atty) 20 n Orange
> > Ave Ste 700 Orlando 32801 FBN
> 0709859 407-325-3585 Letter
> > regarding fraud on the court,
> absent administrative remedy
> > or action in a timely manner, that
> such a biasedness
> > occurred it is described as
> unconscionably ethnically
> > biased, a white collar criminal
> act by a party who misused
> > his/her office to aid and assist
> avoidance of judicial
> > action, that the action was in
> violation of the minor to
> > case’s rights, that the action
> was in violation of
> > parental rights to recovery of
> child support and paternity
> > establishment in the Orange
> County, Ninth Judicial Circuit
> > and Court, Division 42. Sent:
> Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:39
> > PM Subject: ATTORNEY GENERAL
> COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST
> > Hershkowitz Russell S Attorney
> Category: Bankruptcy Law
> > [Edit] 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte
> Springs, FL 32714 (407)
> > 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com Thank you for contacting
> the
> > Attorney General's Office
> regarding ATTORNEY
> > MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL
> NONSUPPORT . Our staff will
> > process it as soon as possible
> and, if necessary, respond
> > appropriately. We appreciate
> hearing from concerned citizens
> > such as yourself. If you wish to
> keep abreast of the
> > activities of this office, you may
> wish to consider a
> > subscription to our electronic
> newsletter Weekly Briefing.
> > Or perhaps our Consumer Alerts.
> Should you wish to subscribe
> > to either, or both, publications,
> please visit our
> > subscription page. COMPLAINT FILED
> AGAINST RUSSELL SCOTT
> > HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire= Retained
> 407-786-2889( 1110 Douglas
> > Ave Altamonte Springs, FL 32714
> (407) 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com COMMENT
> ENTERED ON FEBRUARY
> > 14TH, 2011- OSCE FL DEPT OF
> REVENUE PETITIONED THE COURT TO
> > WITHDRAW THE MOTION TO RECOVER
> BACK OWED OR RETROACTIVE
> > CHILD SUPPORT SUBSEQUENT TO
> JUVENILE PROCEEDINGS. THE STATED
> > MOTIONS STATES “THAT THE
> REPRESENTATION IS BEING WITHDRAWN
> > AND THE PETITION IS WITHDRAWN DUE
> TO “QUESTIONABLE
> > ARREARAGES OWED”- A BIASED
> STATEMENT WITHOU INQUIRY AND
> > PRESENTATION OF THE FACTS OF
> RECORD AVAILABLE TO ALL FL
> > DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND
> FAMILIES- FLORIDA- LEGAL SERVICES
> > FOR CHILDREN, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
> DIVISION, AND FL DEPT OF
> > REV. CHILD SUPPORT DIV.- THE
> ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT
> > REGISTER OF ACTIONS MAINTAINS ALL
> PARTIES TO THE CASE(S)
> > PATERNITY AND CHILD SUPPORT
> HISTORICAL DATA, ADMINISTRATIVE
> > ORDERS- WHICH ARE ABSENT IN
> PROCEEDINGS CONSTITUTING
> > UNCONSCIONABLE DELAYS – IN THE
> CASE OF CARLOS GONZALEZ –
> > THE PATERNITY CASE LASTED BETWEEN
> 2002 – 2006- RESUMING
> > WITH A FILING OF PATERNITY CASE
> NUMBER IN 2005 FOR THE
> > JUDGEMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT WHICH
> WE DO NOT SEE ENTERED AS A
> > FINANL JUDGEMENT UNTIL DECEBMER
> 22, 2010- A PERIOD BETWEEN
> > 2005-2010 (FIVE YEARS – DELAYED
> ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS-
> > ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT) VAWA REPORT
> REGARDING NOT ONLY ATTORNEY
> > MISCONDUCT IN CHILD CUSTODY
> MODIFICATION Intentionally
> > omitted criminal nonsupport,
> offensive behaviour,
> > professional misconduct and ethnic
> biasedness, child
> > exploitation and institutional
> racism Title 42 section 42
> > 1983, 14141 attorney prosecutorial
> child chustody
> > exploitation including false
> statements never heard
> > throughout case trial activity,
> false statements to commence
> > proceedings Case Type:Paternity
> Date Filed:4/24/2002
> > Location:Div 38
> UCN:482002DR006249A001OX Judge: Patricia A
> > Doherty BARBARA FANCHER (LIMITED)
> JONES, > Esquire >
> > Retained 407-849-1133(W) >
> Respondent GONZALEZ, CARLOS
> > ALBERTO > Events & Orders
> of > the Court
> > DISPOSITIONS > 05/15/2012 >
> Order Denying (Judicial
> > > Officer: Evans, Robert M) CC:
> ACAP/THE
> > REGIONAL/DISTRICT & OIG DID
> NOT COMPLY WITH OR THE WAS A
> > FAILURE TO REPORT ( https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/report-fraud/) attached
> > ethical complaint form regarding
> FL CPI CERTIFICATION FOR
> > MISCONDUCT COMPLAINTS; Fw:
> ORGANIZED CRIME BETWEEN ATTYS FI
> > FL DCF, GAL, CPI WHO INTENTIONAL
> COMMITTED FRAUDS, EMPLOYEE
> > MISCONDUCT, PERSONALITY TORTS
> & FRAUD TO COMMENCE
> > PROCEEDINGS IN COURT HARSSMENT
> DURING THE MOTHER AND NATURAL
> > PARENT'S POSTSECONDARY ENROLLMENT
> & THEREAFTER DURING
> > EMPLOYABILITY RECRUITING, LIBELOUS
> STATEMENT WERE MADE WHICH
> > HAVE NO VALIDITY WHILE ABSCOUNDING
> CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT &
> > RECOVERY OF RETROACTIVE CHILD
> SUPPORT)Fw: COMPLAINT RE: GAL
> > PERFORMANCE AND CONDUCT/ DORIS
> MACKEY REPRESENTING FL GAL
> > ORANGE COUNTY COMPLAINT INCLUDES
> THAT THE GAL REPRESENTATIVE
> > ALSO KNEW ABOUT HISTORICAL DATA
> OMITTED FROM TESTIMONY Fw:
> > (CASE DP1140 DIV 7/OMITTED:
> INTENTIONAL BIASEDNESS
> > concurrent court proceedings FL
> DCF KNEW ABOUT :NINTH
> > DISTRICT HISTORICAL DATA DIV 38/42
> PRECEEDING CLAIM BY DCF
> > CPI FELICIA HANDLEY 2005DR14270
> 08-24-2004 Petition for
> > paternity entered Service denied
> 09-24-2004 Petition to
> > establish paternity denied
> Respondent petitioned to dismiss
> > paternity 11-08-2004 05-05-2006
> Final judgment granted on
> > paternity 10-19-2010 Final
> judgment for child support
> > entered 10-22-2010 Order for
> income deduction 11-29-2010
> > Notice of change of address
> 12-28-2010 Petition heard to
> > establish child support 01-14-2011
> Returned mail 01-04-2011
> > Motion to set arrears entered
> 01-04-2011 Notice and hearing
> > 02-14-2011 Hearing to set arrears
> 01/28/2011 Plaintiff
> > petitions for the need for custody
> denied 02/04/2011) Fw:
> > Attorney
> Misconduct/Resubmitted/Attorney Details Needed Per
> > Request PROSECUTOR’S ROLE IN
> ADDRESSING SUSPECTED LAW
> > ENFORCEMENT MISCONDUCT (a) If the
> prosecutor has reason to
> > suspect misconduct or unauthorized
> illegal activity at any
> > level of the prosecutor’s office
> or in any agency or
> > department engaged in a criminal
> investigation, the
> > prosecutor should promptly report
> the suspicion and the
> > reason for it to appropriate
> supervisory personnel in the
> > prosecutor’s office who have
> authority to address the
> > problem, or to the appropriate
> inspector general’s office,
> > or similar agency, if reporting
> within the prosecutor’s
> > own office is problematic.
> Reporting may also be required to
> > comply with requirements of the
> applicable rules of
> > professional conduct, the Model
> Rules and the law of the
> > jurisdiction. Sheila Jocelyn Shaw
> %{attach}
> >
> > Attorney misconduct. Florida Duty
> to
> > report misconduct; code of conduct
> The duty to report
> > misconduct is one of the ethical o
> imposed on attorneys in
> > the United States by the rules
> governing professional
> > responsibility. With certain
> exceptions, an attorney who
> > becomes aware that either a fellow
> attorney or a judge has
> > committed an act in violation of
> the rules of ethical
> > conduct must report that
> violation. Failure to do so
> > subjects the attorney failing to
> make the report to
> > discipline.The duty extends only
> to actual knowledge
> > possessed by an attorney. An
> attorney who has a mere
> > suspicion of misconduct is not
> required to report that
> > suspicion, nor is the attorney
> required to conduct any sort
> > of investigation to confirm or
> dispel that suspicion. The
> > conduct at issue must rise to the
> level of misconduct under
> > the rules of professional
> responsibility. Thus, an attorney
> > who witnesses another attorney
> become intoxicated, engage in
> > adultery, or gamble away a large
> sum of money is under no
> > duty to report these acts because
> they are not prohibited by
> > the rules of professional
> responsibility. Conduct that must
> > be reported, on the other hand,
> includes matters such as
> > breaching client confidentiality,
> misusing client funds,
> > tampering with evidence, suborning
> perjury, offering bribes,
> > and committing criminal acts of
> violence or dishonesty. https://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228
> > 8-2.241 Civil Laws Governing Law
> Enforcement Misconduct
> > BUT ALSO LAWS THAT ARE FOR THE
> PREVENTION OF NEGLECT OF THE
> > CHILD. 827.03 Abuse, aggravated
> abuse, and neglect of a
> > child; penalties.— All
> historical case proceedings
> > associated with FL Dept of Rev.
> Child Support
> > Enforcement/TANF participation
> & Medicaid participation
> > relative to court proceedings were
> filed and available
> > including court filings and shared
> RISs regional information
> > sharing system btwn OCSE & DCF
> departments; FL DCF Case
> > #9457320158 (RFA CASE NUMBER
> 1143172973) Ineffective
> > counsel/representation,fraud to
> commence proceedings FL ACAP
> > Complaint ATTY DECEIT,
> goo.gl/h9wjQr SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221
> > CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498,
> COLLUSION #OIG #fraud, PUBLIC LAW
> > 108 - 21 #misconduct atty
> deceit,collusion;Case No.
> > 2002-DR-050423-I,IVD case
> enforcement FL/PA/IN #misconduct,
> > cases OC9901243 PA &
> 02-83719047104532 PA Cause #
> > 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL
> 2010-DP 1170 FL CASE#s
> > #misconduct,professional
> misconduct cases:OC9901243 PA &
> > 02-83719047104532 PA Cause #
> 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472
> > FL 2010-DP 1170 FL IN CASE #s
Barbara Tanner Jones & Tangel-Rodriguez & Associates 222 Weber St, Orlando, FL 32803 Bar Number: 391956 Mail Address: Tangel-Rodriguez & Assoc 222 Weber St Orlando, FL 32803-3831 United States Office: 407-849-1133 Cell: 407-849-1133
SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS MACKEY Heather Morcroft (Appellate Atty) 20 n Orange Ave Ste 700 Orlando 32801 FBN 0709859 407-325-3585 Attorney for Jarrid D. Williams Carlos Alberto Gonzalez Bar Number: 656755 Mail Address: Wayne Starr P.A. PO Box 560206 Orlando, FL 32856-0206 United States Office: 407-228-7280 Fax: 407-228-4296 Email: waynestarr@cfl.rr.com
Case# 482005DR014270A001OX) THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300 (KNOWLEDGE OF FRAUD AND INTENTIONAL OMISSION BY THE OTHER ATTYS - ". As an officer of the court, a lawyer cannot have his client perjure himself on the stand, that is, if that lawyer knows it is a lie. Otherwise, a lawyer would be perpetuating fraud upon the court. At that point, the lawyer is under an obligation to withdraw from the case (according to the rules of professional conduct). The lawyer is not required to divulge the reason for the withdrawal, in fact, it is improper to disclose such reasons due to attorney/client privilege but it would usually give the judge a good clue based on timing of the withdrawal. In short, a lawyer cannot stand by and watch the client lie to the court...."
Complaint (5617503201, FELICIA HANDLEY, ORANGE COUNTY, FL CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department
Federal laws Federal law 42 U.S.C. § 5772 & 42 U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5772) defines a "missing child" as "any individual less than 18 years of age whose whereabouts are unknown to such individual"s legal custodian
, that such a biasedness occurred it is described as unconscionably ethnically biased, a white collar criminal act by a party who misused his/her office to aid and assist avoidance of judicial action, that the action was in violation of the minor to case’s rights, that the action was in violation of parental rights to recovery of child support and paternity establishment in the Orange County, Ninth Judicial Circuit and Court, Division 42. Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:39 PM Subject: ATTORNEY GENERAL COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST Hershkowitz Russell S Attorney Category: Bankruptcy Law [Edit] 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 (407) 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com Thank you for contacting the Attorney General's Office regarding ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT . Our staff will process it as soon as possible and, if necessary, respond appropriately. We appreciate hearing from concerned citizens such as yourself. If you wish to keep abreast of the activities of this office, you may wish to consider a subscription to our electronic newsletter Weekly Briefing. Or perhaps our Consumer Alerts. Should you wish to subscribe to either, or both, publications, please visit our subscription page.
COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST
(Attorney for Carlos Gonzalez in child support proceedings.
Order for a judgement of "current" child support was entered by the judgement on DECEMBER 22, 2010. "RESERVING" ONCE AGAIN ARREARS ANT PAST DUE CHILD SUPPORT BY WHICH PATRRNITY WAS ESTABLISHED IN 2006 (A HISTORICAL DATA/RECORD OF UNCONCIONABLE DELAYS/PREVIOUSLY HEARD BY JUDICIAL MAGISTRATES, GEORGE WINSLO AND JUDGE ROCHE.)
ATTORNEY RUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire= Retained 407-786-2889( 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 (407) 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com
...CONTINUED ABUSE REGARDING INTENTIONAL REFUSAL TO SUPPORT THE CHILD OF WHICH PATERNITY HAD BEEN ESTABLISHED 5 (5 X 365 DAYS) IN THE CASE OF CARLOS GONZALEZ AND IN THE CASE OF JARRID DESHAUN WILLIAMS THAT P0ROCEEDING WERE ON THE JUDICIAL CALENDAR IN THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT WITH A WITHDRAWAL ON FEBRAURY 14TH 2011 (COINCIDENTALLY AFTER THE ISSUANCE OF A TEMPORARY MODIFICATION OF CHILD CUSTODY, COINCIDENTALLY AFTER A CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT TO THE FLORIDA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT BY CARLOS GONZALEZ IN JANUARY FOR THE MONTY OF JANUARY 2011, AFTER THE FINAL JUDGEMENT FOR A CURRENT SUPPORT ORDER HAD BEEN ISSUED DECEMBER 22ND, 2010) VIOLATIONS INCLUDE: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NON SUPPORT & CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY ACT VIOLATION(COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENTS- TITLE 42, FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW VIOLATIONS: REQUIREMENT OF STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED PROCEDURES ...
-- On Fri, 1/12/18, Sheila Shaw <nine09digits@yahoo.com> wrote:
> From: Sheila Shaw <nine09digits@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Fw: ATTN Shyann Elijah ESQ- I am interested in you reporting the fraud on the court, attorney deceit-and biased incidents failure to disclose & failure to consolidate family law cases, with the intent to defraud the court (grounds to void the judgement/vacate the judgement as I submitted to the family court-Rule 12.003 Coordination of Related Family Cases and Hearings
> To: "foundation@wif.org" <foundation@wif.org>, "Nywift Info" <info@nywift.org>, "Wif Info" <info@wif.org>, "wifdallas@yahoo.com" <wifdallas@yahoo.com>
> Date: Friday, January 12, 2018, 6:32 PM
>
>
> Sheila Jocelyn Shaw
> http://professsorshaw.blogspot.com/
>
>
> --- On Fri, 1/12/18, Sheila Shaw <nine09digits@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> > From: Sheila Shaw <nine09digits@yahoo.com>
> > Subject: ATTN Shyann Elijah ESQ- I
> am interested in you reporting the fraud on the court,
> attorney deceit-and biased incidents failure to disclose
> & failure to consolidate family law cases, with the
> intent to defraud the court (grounds to void the
> judgement/vacate the judgement as I submitted to the family
> court-Rule 12.003 Coordination of Related Family Cases and
> Hearings
> > To: Floridaattorney@gmail.com
> > Date: Friday, January 12, 2018,
> 11:19 AM
> > Atty deceit-Taner withdrew from an
> OCSE FL
> > DEPT REV CASE WITH COMMENTS
> ENTERED ON 2/15/2011 that
> > arrears were questionable when in
> fact departmental records
> > and FL 9TH DISTRICT LIDIA GARNER
> CLERK OF COURT RECORDS
> > MANAGEMENT HISTORICAL DATA
> CONTAINED ADVERSE ACCOUNTS OF ANY
> > QUESTIONABLE CHILD SUPPORT IN FACT
> LEGALLY STATED AND IN
> > ACCORD WITH TITLE 42 SECTIONS
> 654,655,657 social security
> > child support stipulations; Taner
> withdrew after fraud to
> > commence proceedings on 2/03/2011
> when FELICIA HANDLEY SENT
> > A DEPT EMAIL STATING THE MINOR TO
> CASE WAS MISSING A FALSE
> > STATEMENT MADE 1 DAY PRIOR TO FL
> DEPT CHILD SUPPORT UNIT WAS
> > TOLD TO ABATE OR IT WAS DOCUMENTED
> THA ABATED CHILD SUPPORT
> > PAYMENT MADE BY GONZALEZ WAS IN
> EFFECT PRIOR TO A TEMPORARY
> > ORDER FOR MODIFICATION OF CUSTODY
> WAS ISSUED THRU THE
> > DEPENDENCY COURT 9TH DISTRICT A
> MODIFICATION BASED ON FRAUD.
> > A SUBSEQUENT PETITION TO THE 9TH
> DISTRICT FAMILY COURT AS
> > INSTRUCTED WHERE FOLLOWUP
> PETITIONS WERE TO BE MADE-Petition
> > to vacate the judgement was denied
> after the judicial
> > magistrate held the petition, A
> MOCKERY OF PRIOR RESERVED
> > ACTIONS BY THE PRECEEDING JUDICIAL
> MAGISTRATES AND HEARING
> > OFFICERS, Roche and George
> Winslow, a repetited pattern of
> > reserving a current child support
> order had preceeding the
> > judgement made 12/22/2010-
> > a current support order was
> finally
> > issued on Michyl Shaw's case.
> Professional Standards
> > Complaint (s)- Fw: Atty Deceit
> Complaint/Dependency Fraud in
> > the court incidents ( Barbara
> Tanner Jones- Tangel-Rodriguez
> > & Associates 222 Weber St,
> Orlando, FL 32803 Case#
> > 482005DR014270A001OX) withdrew on
> February 15th, 2011
> > representation-(Where a lawyer
> learns of another lawyer’s
> > misconduct in the course of
> representing her client, and the
> > information about the misconduct
> constitutes a confidence or
> > secret within the meaning of Rule
> 1.6, that Rule prohibits
> > her reporting it without the
> client’s consent. If, after
> > having been made fully aware of
> any possible adverse
> > consequences for his ultimate
> recovery...) AFTER A FRAUD TO
> > COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS WAS INITIATED
> BY A FL DCF CPI-
> > TEMPORARY MODIFICATION WAS
> REQUESTED TO ABATE NOT ONLY CHILD
> > SUPPORT PAYMENT IN A CURRENT ORDER
> ISSUES DECEMBER 22ND,
> > 2010-TO ABATE LEGAL REPRESENTATION
> FROM THE GO DEPT OF
> > REVENUE BECAUSE THE DCF ATTORNEYS
> HAD NO INTENTION OF
> > CONSOLIDATING EXISTING FAMILY LAW
> CASES-RELATED CASES IN
> > ORDER TO DEFRAUD THE COURT -IN
> WHICH THE INITIAL ALLEGATION
> > WAS NEVER HEARD DURING PROCEEDINGS
> BETWEEN FEBRUARY 2011
> > THROUGH AUGUST 2011
> >
> >
> >
> > Public policy/White Collar
> Criminal
> > Acts/Attorney Misconduct involving
> racial profiling &
> > hate group harassment
> >
> >
> > FL CPI 5617503201
> >
> > False reporting that she knew
> would be
> > classified as a violent crime,
> would involve subsequent
> > legal causation including the
> P.R.O.T.E.C.T. Act which
> > is a PROSECUTORIAL TOOL
> INVESTIGATION AND MONITORING
> > COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE CHILDREN
> AND THE DADS.
> >
> > THAT WAS FEBRUARY OF 2011.
> > ALTHOUGH THE OFFICE OF THE
> INSPECTOR
> > GENERAL WITHIN THE FLORIDA DCF
> CONFIRMED NO PARTICIPATION
> > FROM FL DCF AGENTS (OFFICIALLY)
> OCCURRED AFTER THE
> > ADJUDICATED CASE CLOSURE AS OF
> AUGUST 2011, HARASSMENT AND
> > DEFAMATION CONTINUED AND
> ADDITIONAL FABRICATIONS BY PUBLIC
> > OFFICERS CONTINUED TO EXONERATE
> HANDLEY'S FALSE MISSING
> > CHILDREN'S/KIDNAPPING "STATEMENT"
> NOT CRIMINAL CHARGES SHE
> > WROTE UP ON A GOVERNMENT OFFICE
> FORM AND DOCUMENT
> > "DEPENDENCY ARRAIGNMENT " FORM,
> MISLEADING OTHERS THAT A
> > CRIMINAL ARRAIGNMENT HAD ENSUED OR
> THAT I WAS INVOLVED IN A
> > CRIME AGAINST CHILDREN CHARGE.
> FRAUD TO COMMENCE
> > PROCEEDINGS, INTENTIONAL ATTORNEY
> DECEIT FOR NONDISCLOSURE
> > OF THE FIRST PAGE INCLUDING THESE
> FRAUDULENT STATEMENTS TO
> > THE JUDGE, CONTINUING GENDER
> VIOLENCE/EXINTIMATE PARTNER
> > DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INVOLVING THE
> SAME PARTIES IN CONCURRENT
> > FAMILY LAW CASES IN THE SAME NINTH
> DISTRICT COURTS ANOTHER
> > DIVISIONS, PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING
> ALL PARTIES WERE ONGOING IN
> > DIVISIONS 7 & 38/42.
> > ON THE PUBLIC CLERK OF COURT
> REGISTRIES
> > AND FL DEPR REVENUE ATTY
> HISTORICAL DATA, INTENTIONALLY
> > UNCONSOLIDATED.
> >
> >
> > https://goo.gl/9U5P5k
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > There are circumstances where
> failure
> > to make a disclosure is the
> equivalent of an affirmative
> > misrepresentation. The obligation
> prescribed in Rule 1.2(d)
> > not to counsel a client to commit
> or assist the client in
> > committing a fraud applies in
> litigation. Regarding
> > compliance with Rule 1.2(d), see
> the Comment to that Rule.
> > See also the Comment to Rule
> 8.4(b).
> >
> >
> > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/06/9457320158-rfa-case-number-1143172973.html?m=1
> >
> >
> >
> > After WHICH a number of harassing
> > incidents and false claims were
> made during self help legal
> > filings, petitions and online
> computer research, online
> > filing and general use related to
> human rights including
> > employment, academic and
> correspondence with other family
> > members.
> >
> >
> > It is a crime for one or more
> persons
> > acting under color of law
> willfully to deprive or conspire
> > to deprive another person of any
> right protected by the
> > Constitution or laws of the United
> States. (18 U.S.C. §§
> > 241, 242)
> >
> >
> > Here I posted a document entitled
> ORDER
> > OF ARRAIGNMENT FOR JUVENILE
> DEPENDENCY HEARING in the
> > foregoing link, whereas the CPI
> representing FL DCF CHILD
> > PROTECTION AND CHILDREN'S LEGAL
> SERVICES alleged my children
> > were missing - implying that they
> were at some point in the
> > custody of someone other than
> their mother who was in family
> > court proceedings against the
> paternal dads, who which by
> > the way she kept making up excuses
> to call the dads and
> > temporary allow them custody
> despite them being adverse
> > court adversaries.
> > Such as on January 27th, 2011
> Felicia
> > Handley, CPI # , made up or
> fabricated an excuse for an
> > overnight stay with the dads, the
> proceedings were dismissed
> > by Judge Anthony Johnson on
> 1/28/2011 ONE DAY PRIOR TO MY
> > DAUGHTERS'S FOURTH BIRTHDAY
> 01/29/2011. HARASSMENT OR
> > PERPETUATED DOMESTIC VIOLENCE THRU
> MISUSE OF OFFICE.
> > WHAT JUDGE DO YOU KNOW DOES NOT
> ADDRESS
> > THE ALLEGATION IN HEARINGS HELD
> BETWEEN FEBRUARY 2011 THRU
> > AUGUST 30TH, 2011- THIS CASE
> COMMENCED ON FRAUD AND ALL THE
> > ATTORNEYS INVOLVED HAD THE FIRST
> PAGE OF THE ARRAIGNMENT
> > & NEVER SAID ONE WORD
> THROUGHOUT THE HEARINGS BUT
> > CONTINUED TO FABRICATE AN EXCUSE
> INCLUDING QUESTIONING MY
> > MATRICULATION THROUGH EVEREST
> UNIVERSITY- ORLANDO NORTH -
> > ORLANDO, FLORIDA & CORLLINS
> UNIVERSITY, STOCKTON,
> > CA.RECENT MATRICULATED PROGRAMS
> AT THE TIME OF HER
> > ALLEGATIONS WHICH WERE REPORTED TO
> EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
> > DIVISION OF THE US DEPT OF JUSTICE
> AS A HATE CRIME, GENDER
> > VIOLENCE.
> > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/04/fraud-rule-33-candor-toward-tribunal.html
> > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/05/cc-judicial-misconduct-judicial_23.html
> > https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/judicialethics/resources/TPL_jethics_internet.authcheckdam.pdf
> > HANDLEY KNEW THE PROCEDURE WELL AS
> IN
> > ANY BAILOR/BAILEE OR DUTY OF CARE
> - ROUTINE PROCEDURES THEY
> > DO EVERYDAY -AS WELL AS THE
> DEPENDENCY GAL PARTICIPANTS
> > DORIS MACKEY & DCF ATTYS WHO
> NEVER CONSOLIDATED RELATED
> > CASES-REQUIRED
> >
> >
> > PART ONE (See Page 1, PART ONE -
> > Complainant Information.):
> Complaint Details Legal Cause and
> > Tortious Injury (As a result of
> the fraudulent
> > acts/omissions, and deceit by
> attorney and departmental
> > employee whereas deprivation of
> rights involved those rights
> > of the minors and the natural
> parent and mother) *FRAUD ON
> > THE COURT TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS
> On the part of the
> > attorney herein and afore
> mentioned in proceedings: Duty to
> > report misconduct; code of
> >
> conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228
> > THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER
> ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651
> > EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE,
> FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON
> > THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA
> JOCELYN SHAW PARTY TO THE
> > COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S)
> PART TWO (See Page 1,
> > PART TWO - Attorney Information
> FLORIDA BAR MEMBER(S):
> > SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR
> ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD
> > LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498
> AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC
> > TIBON DORIS MACKEY GAL- PART T H R
> E E (See Page 1, PART T H
> > R E E - Facts/Allegations.): The
> specific thing or things I
> > am complaining about are: (attach
> additional sheets as
> > necessary) "Fraud. Rule 3.3 Candor
> Toward The Tribunal -
> > Comment [1] This Rule governs the
> conduct of a lawyer who is
> > representing a client in the
> proceedings of a tribunal. See
> > Rule 1.0(m) for the definition of
> "tribunal." It also
> > applies when the lawyer is
> representing a client in an
> > ancillary proceeding conducted
> pursuant to the tribunal’s
> > adjudicative authority, such as a
> deposition. Thus, for
> > example, paragraph (a)(3) requires
> a lawyer to take
> > reasonable remedial measures if
> the lawyer comes to know
> > that a client who is testifying in
> a deposition has offered
> > evidence that is false. [2] This
> Rule sets forth the special
> > duties of lawyers as officers of
> the court to avoid conduct
> > that undermines the integrity of
> the adjudicative process. A
> > lawyer acting as an advocate in an
> adjudicative proceeding
> > has an obligation to present the
> client's case with
> > persuasive force. Performance of
> that duty while maintaining
> > confidences of the client,
> however, is qualified by the
> > advocate's duty of candor to the
> tribunal. Consequently,
> > although a lawyer in an adversary
> proceeding is not required
> > to present an impartial exposition
> of the law or to vouch
> > for the evidence submitted in a
> cause, the lawyer must not
> > allow the tribunal to be misled by
> false statements of law
> > or fact or evidence that the
> lawyer knows to be false."
> > State employee misconduct which
> resulted in material
> > injuries and legal causation:
> *Police stalking. Conspired
> > with FL DCF STATE EMPLOYEE
> EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT, CPI NUMBER
> > 5617503201 http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/?m=1
> > 9457320158 (RFA CASE NUMBER
> 1143172973) insurance
> > covering dental/medical Dr. Obeori
> & Dr.Nau (Michyl,
> > Isis) http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/02/httpflcertificationboardorg.html?m=1
> > Firm associated with complaint.
> Interstate stalking and
> > trespassing related to a divorcee
> case. Hershkowitz Russell
> > S Attorney : Fw: ADMINISTRATIVE
> 92-1; In all family law
> > cases in which a trial is
> anticipated, the attorney shall
> > submit a notice that the cause is
> at issue.- intentional
> > omissions; w: Mr. Williams is
> refusing visitation with the
> > minor contrary to the oral
> & written child
> > visitation with Atty Wayne Starr
> at the last hearing
> > 8/30/2011- subsequent modification
> petitions have been
> > submitted resulting in excuses by
> court administration,
> > lastly stating a parental
> responsibility packet is needed-
> > THERE IS NO PRESUMPTIVE FATHERHOOD
> STATUE APPLICABLE, UNWED
> > AT BIRTH AND CISTODY BTW 2007 THRU
> 2011 WAS WITH THE
> > MOTHERHOOD. THERE IS NO CHANCE OF
> RESOLUTION OF ANY INTIMATE
> > PARTNER RELATIONSHIP &
> WILLIAMS AND SEVERAL OF HIS
> > FAMILY TIES HAVE REPEATED ENGAGED
> IN OFFENSIVE BEHAVIOURS
> > AND PROPERTY THEFTS MONETARY
> CLAIMS PRECEEDING THE ACTUAL
> > JUDGEMENT FOR SUPPORT Fw: Court
> Administration employee
> > misconduct/judicial misconduct-
> unconscionable delays
> > & biased proceedings,
> concealed concurtent criminal
> > proceeding involving Jarrid
> Williams 2/2011/ continuing
> > domestic violence& abuse
> of the child support order
> > by law enforcement personnel ,
> domestic violence > To: info@idvaac.org
> > > Cc: "judicial misconduct" ,
> "judicial misconduct" ,
> > "judicial misconduct" , "judicial
> misconduct" , "judicial
> > misconduct" , "judicial
> misconduct" , "judicial misconduct"
> > , "judicial misconduct" ,
> "judicial misconduct" , "judicial
> > misconduct" , "judicial
> misconduct" , "judicial misconduct"
> > , "judicial misconduct" ,
> "judicial misconduct" , "judicial
> > misconduct" , "judicial" ,
> "Judicial" , "Judicial Committee"
> > > Date: Friday, March 17, 2017,
> 8:25 PM omissions:
> > unconsolidated cases/related cases
> whereas information
> > therein would substantially affect
> those involved such as
> > that of concurrent criminal
> nonsupport proceedings against
> > the plaintiff/paternal fathers to
> case- as indicative on the
> > Lidia Gardner Clerk of Court
> Registries http://icpcstatepages.org/florida/criminalbackground/
> > 39.0138 Criminal history and
> other records checks;
> > limit on placement of a child—
> (1) The department shall
> > conduct a records check through
> the State Automated Child
> > Welfare Information System
> (SACWIS) and a local and
> > statewide criminal history records
> check on all persons,
> > including parents, being
> considered by the department for
> > placement of a child under this
> chapter, including all
> > non-relative placement decisions,
> and all members of the
> > household, 12 years of age and
> older, of the person being
> > considered. For purposes of this
> section, a criminal history
> > records check may include, but is
> not limited to, submission
> > of fingerprints to the Department
> of Law Enforcement for
> > processing and forwarding to the
> Federal Bureau of
> > Investigation for state and
> national criminal history
> > information, and local criminal
> records checks through local
> > law enforcement agencies of all
> household members 18 years
> > of age and older and other
> visitors to the home. An
> > out-of-state criminal history
> records check must be
> > initiated for any person 18 years
> of age or older who
> > resided in another state if that
> state allows the release of
> > such records. The department shall
> establish by rule
> > standards for evaluating any
> information contained in the
> > automated system relating to a
> person who must be screened
> > for purposes of making a placement
> decision. 1. Chapter
> > 560, relating to the Money
> Transmitters’ Code.
> > 2. Chapter 812, relating to
> theft, robbery, and related
> > crimes. 3. Chapter 815, relating
> to computer-related
> > crimes. 4. Chapter 817, relating
> to fraudulent practices.
> > 5. Chapter 825, relating to
> abuse, neglect, and
> > exploitation of elderly persons
> and disabled adults.
> > 6. Chapter 831, relating to
> forgery and counterfeiting.
> > 7. Chapter 832, relating to the
> issuance of worthless
> > checks and drafts. 8. Chapter
> 838, relating to bribery and
> > misuse of public office.
> 9. Chapter 839, relating to
> > offenses by public officers and
> employees. 10. Chapter
> > 895, relating to offenses
> concerning racketeering and
> > illegal debts. 11. Chapter 896,
> relating to offenses
> > related to financial transactions.
> (b) A felony offense
> > that is committed with intent to
> defraud or that involves a
> > conspiracy to defraud. (c) A
> felony offense that is
> > committed with intent to
> temporarily or permanently deprive
> > a person of his or her property or
> that involves a
> > conspiracy to temporarily or
> permanently deprive a person of
> > his or her property. (d) A
> felony offense that involves or
> > results in the commission of fraud
> or deceit upon a person
> > or that involves a conspiracy to
> commit fraud or deceit upon
> > a person. (4) As used in this
> section, “aggravated white
> > collar crime” means engaging in
> at least two white collar
> > crimes that have the same or
> similar intents, results,
> > accomplices, victims, or methods
> of commission, or that are
> > otherwise interrelated by
> distinguishing characteristics and
> > are not isolated incidents,
> provided that at least one of
> > such crimes occurred after the
> effective date of this act.
> > (5) Any person who commits an
> aggravated white collar
> > crime as defined in this section
> and in so doing either:
> > (a) Victimizes 10 or more
> elderly persons, as defined in
> > s. 825.101; (b) Victimizes 20 or
> more persons, as defined
> > in s. 1.01; or (c) Victimizes
> the State of Florida, any
> > state agency, any of the state’s
> political subdivisions,
> > or any agency of the state’s
> political subdivisions, and
> > thereby obtains or attempts to
> obtain $50,000 or more,
> > commits a felony of the first
> degree, punishable as provided
> > in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s.
> 775.084. *concurrent court
> > proceedings FL DCF KNEW ABOUT
> :NINTH DISTRICT HISTORICAL
> > DATA DIV 38/42 PRECEEDING CLAIM BY
> DCF CPI FELICIA HANDLEY
> > 2005DR14270 08-24-2004 Petition
> for paternity entered
> > Service denied 09-24-2004 Petition
> to establish paternity
> > denied Respondent petitioned to
> dismiss paternity 11-08-2004
> > 05-05-2006 Final judgment granted
> on paternity 10-19-2010
> > Final judgment for child support
> entered 10-22-2010 Order
> > for income deduction 11-29-2010
> Notice of change of address
> > 12-28-2010 Petition heard to
> establish child support
> > 01-14-2011 Returned mail
> 01-04-2011 Motion to set arrears
> > entered 01-04-2011 Notice and
> hearing 02-14-2011 Hearing to
> > set arrears 01/28/2011 Plaintiff
> petitions for the need for
> > custody denied 02/04/2011 THE
> SPECIFIC THING OR THINGS I AM
> > COMPLAINING ABOUT ARE: 18 U.S.C.
> §§ 241, 242). "Color of
> > law" simply means that the person
> doing the act is using
> > power given to him or her by a
> governmental agency (local,
> > State, or Federal). A law
> enforcement officer acts "under
> > color of law" even if he or she is
> exceeding his or her
> > rightful power. THAT ON THE ONSET
> OF PROCEEDINGS DATED
> > 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA SHAW, AS
> THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE
> > DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION 7,
> ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT:
> > Juvenile Division 2000 E. Michigan
> St.Suite 300 Orlando, FL
> > 32806 PROCEEDINGS (WAIVED NOTICE
> OF OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD
> > TO BE IN WRITING- WAIVED BY THE
> JUDGE) WERE COMMENCED
> > WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE
> PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE
> > HISTORICAL DATA AND CONCURRENT
> CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS, AND
> > HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS
> CONCURRENTLY PUBLISHED IN DIVISION
> > 42 COURT, VIA CLERK OF THE ORANGE
> COUNTY CLERK OF COURT,
> > MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE RECORDS
> MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE
> > RISS DATABASE, THE DEPARTMENT OF
> CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR
> > ACCOUNTS OF INTERAGENCY ACCESS
> WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
> > OF REVENUE. THE COMPLAINANT MAKES
> REFERENCE THAT THE
> > ATTORNEY’S, WITH KNOWLEDGE,
> ACTED IN A DECEITFUL MANNER,
> > NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION FOR THE
> PURPOSE OF FRAUD RELATIVE
> > TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF JUDICIAL
> PROCEEDINGS. *Duty to report
> > misconduct; code of
> >
> conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228
> > THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER
> ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651
> > EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE,
> FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON
> > THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA
> JOCELYN SHAW PARTY TO THE
> > COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S)
> 1. Chapter 560,
> > relating to the Money
> Transmitters’ Code. 2. Chapter
> > 812, relating to theft, robbery,
> and related crimes.
> > 3. Chapter 815, relating to
> computer-related crimes.
> > 4. Chapter 817, relating to
> fraudulent practices.
> > 5. Chapter 825, relating to
> abuse, neglect, and
> > exploitation of elderly persons
> and disabled adults.
> > 6. Chapter 831, relating to
> forgery and counterfeiting.
> > 7. Chapter 832, relating to the
> issuance of worthless
> > checks and drafts. 8. Chapter
> 838, relating to bribery and
> > misuse of public office.
> 9. Chapter 839, relating to
> > offenses by public officers and
> employees. 10. Chapter
> > 895, relating to offenses
> concerning racketeering and
> > illegal debts. 11. Chapter 896,
> relating to offenses
> > related to financial transactions.
> (b) A felony offense
> > that is committed with intent to
> defraud or that involves a
> > conspiracy to defraud. (c) A
> felony offense that is
> > committed with intent to
> temporarily or permanently deprive
> > a person of his or her property or
> that involves a
> > conspiracy to temporarily or
> permanently deprive a person of
> > his or her property. (d) A
> felony offense that involves or
> > results in the commission of fraud
> or deceit upon a person
> > or that involves a conspiracy to
> commit fraud or deceit upon
> > a person. (4) As used in this
> section, “aggravated white
> > collar crime” means engaging in
> at least two white collar
> > crimes that have the same or
> similar intents, results,
> > accomplices, victims, or methods
> of commission, or that are
> > otherwise interrelated by
> distinguishing characteristics and
> > are not isolated incidents,
> provided that at least one of
> > such crimes occurred after the
> effective date of this act.
> > (5) Any person who commits an
> aggravated white collar
> > crime as defined in this section
> and in so doing either:
> > (a) Victimizes 10 or more
> elderly persons, as defined in
> > s. 825.101; (b) Victimizes 20 or
> more persons, as defined
> > in s. 1.01; or (c) Victimizes
> the State of Florida, any
> > state agency, any of the state’s
> political subdivisions,
> > or any agency of the state’s
> political subdivisions, and
> > thereby obtains or attempts to
> obtain $50,000 or more,
> > commits a felony of the first
> degree, punishable as provided
> > in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s.
> 775.084. ACAP BAR COMPLAINT
> > DETAILS/PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS
> VIOLATIONS. Fw: EMPLOYEE
> > MISCOND KUCT (hate crimes,
> continuing domestic violence
> > after breaking up with Williams)
> CF180-4 ( per your
> > publication, the SCOPE of
> guidelines, goverance of employee
> > ethical and professional conduct
> states: “Fraud” means
> > to commit an intentional violation
> of law or a deliberate
> > misrepresentation or concealment
> so as to secure unfair or
> > unlawful financial or personal
> gain.) In this case whereas
> > fraud in the manner and form
> constituting DOMESTIC VIOLENCE,
> > PUBLIC OFFICER/ATTORNEY DECEIT,
> COLLUSION, that he/she did
> > KNOWINGLY WITH INTENT TO COMMIT
> AGGRAVATED (COMPOUNDED)
> > SEMITIC HATE, ETHNICALLY BIASED
> CRIMINAL TORTS, DURESS AND
> > EMOTIONAL ABUSE AND ALIENATION TO
> THE MOTHER WHO WAS ALREADY
> > A VICTIM OF ABUSE OF DOMESTIC
> VIOLENCE IN THE MANNER AND
> > FORMS OF EXINTIMATE PARTNER &
> FAMILY VIOLENCE,
> > PERSONALITY TORTS AND FRAUD TO
> COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS, AND
> > DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RELATED TO
> PRECEEDING ASCERTAINMENT
> > PURSUITS THROUGH ADMINISTRATIVE
> AND JUDICIAL ACTIONS WHICH
> > WERE INTENTIONALLY AND
> "SELECTIVELY" BIASED IN APPLICATION
> > OF THE LAWS BOTH FEDERAL AND STATE
> STATUTORY APPLICATION TO
> > CHILD CUSTODY, CHILD SUPPORT
> COLLECTION, RECOVERY AND
> > DISBURSEMENT, WITH AN ACT OF
> VIOLENCE OCCURRING FEBRUARY 4TH
> > 2011 IN THE ABATEMENT OF CHILD
> DUPPORT FROM THE PRECEEDING
> > MONTH OF COLLECTION JANUARY 2011,
> AFTER JUDGEMENT REIDERED
> > ON DECEMBER 22ND, 2010 LESS THAN
> 60(SIXTY DAYS) THAT
> > EMPLOYEE KNOWLEDGE THRU THE RISS
> INFORMATION SHARING SYSTEM
> > PROMPTED MALICIOUS, RETALIATORY
> STATEMENT TO INTERFER WITH
> > FL SDU DISBURSEMENT, REVERSING THE
> JANUARY PAYMENT AFTER
> > FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDING ONSET
> AGAIN AFTER AN EARLY
> > DISMISSAL ON JANUARY 28TH, 2011,
> BOTH OF WHICH INITIAL CLAIM
> > WERE OMITTED DUE TO EMPLOYEE
> FRAUD/MISCONDUCT
> >
> >
> > White Collar Fraud participant.
> Program
> > abuse/court record omissions
> imposed a biased prejudice in
> > judicial proceedings, concealment
> of criminal nonsupport
> > histories of the payernal dad and
> domestic violence against
> > the mother, natural parent. Ethnic
> intimidation on false
> > allegations of kidnapping based on
> program employee
> > misconduct involing Orange County
> Sheriff employee
> > misconduct, family violence
> personality torts. The mother
> > has no criminal history
> constituting violent crimes or
> > kidnapping/missing children
> criminal charges nor child abuse
> > as alleged personality torts were
> used to slander and defame
> > the mother by the paternal dad's
> familt ties working in law
> > enforcement. The incident involves
> retaliatory harassment
> > related to a family violence
> situation in another state and
> > county in which the paternal dad
> alleged that the mother's
> > daughter was a participant in
> parental alienation and
> > divorcee proceedings. Harassment
> that was setup through
> > family ties wirking in
> administrative venue. Complaint
> > involves neglience, FL DCF
> employee violations of
> > administrative policies wherein it
> is clearly defined what
> > constitutes employee misconduct,
> fraud. All parties knew of
> > procedure based upon "duty of
> care", the greater
> > responsibilty in reporting
> misconduct was tge responsibilty
> > of the other employees and
> attorneys who routinely handle
> > cases and are subject to
> administrative policies, statutory
> > obligations and professional
> responsibilities under model
> > policies of domestic violence,
> juvenile courts, FL DCF
> > employee handbook code of conduct
> and which representation
> > is suppose to enforce a fair and
> equal protection under the
> > law. CF180-4 Complaint against:
> Devereux Florida Foster Care
> > Program Orange/Osceola/Seminole
> County 5749 Westgate Drive,
> > Suite 102 ~ Orlando, FL 32835
> Phone: 321.441.1567 Fax:
> > 321.281.3887 PERSONALITY TORTS
> TORTS OF FRAUD TO DEFAME
> > CHARACTER OF THE MOTHER AS
> DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PERPETUATED BY
> > STATE EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT, CPI
> NUMBER 5617503201; Fw: Fwd:
> > ATTACHED AFFIDAVIT ON DATE OF
> FALSE ALLEGATION BY CPI-ETHNIC
> > BIASNESS/RACIAL PROFILING
> COMPLAINT;Fw: CPI 5617503201
> > EMERGENCY RESPONSE FALSE COMPLAINT
> SUBMITTED TO LAW
> > ENFORCEMENT REGARDING CHILD
> CUSTODY - THE NATURAL PARENT,
> > MOTHER HAD CUSTODY resubmitted the
> ACAP CONSUMER ASSISTANCE
> > COMPLAINT/ACAP ATTY COMPLAINT/
> INQUIRY/COMPLAINT
> > FORM/INTENTIONALLY OMITTED
> FRAUDULENT STATEMENT , fraud and
> > white collar criminal behavior
> 39.0141 A Missing Children
> > Report is Required and is found to
> be absent in all
> > proceedings prior to date. &
> 95.11 Tort actions for
> > fraud or assault
> &39.0014,39.0141 MISSING CHILDRENS
> > REPORT REQUIRED TO: CC / BCC:
> FROM: SUBJECT: Fw:
> > resubmitted the ACAP CONSUMER
> ASSISTANCE COMPLAINT/ACAP ATTY
> > COMPLAINT/ INQUIRY/COMPLAINT
> FORM/INTENTIONALLY OMITTED
> > FRAUDULENT STATEMENT , fraud and
> white collar criminal
> > behavior 39.0141 A Missing
> Children Report is Required and
> > is found to be absent in all
> proceedings prior to date.
> > & 95.11 Tort actions for fraud
> or assault
> > &39.0014,39.0141 MISSING
> CHILDRENS REPORT REQUIRED
> > Choose File Original Message On
> Jan 9, 2017, at 9:30 AM,
> > Sheila Shaw wrote: From: Sheila
> Shaw ; To: Nine09digits ;
> > Sheila Jocelyn ; Subject:
> resubmitted the ACAP CONSUMER
> > ASSISTANCE COMPLAINT/ACAP ATTY
> COMPLAINT/ INQUIRY/COMPLAINT
> > FORM Sent: Fri, Jan 6, 2017
> 9:39:00 PM ACAP ATTY COMPLAINT/
> > INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM THE FLORIDA
> BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER
> > ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST
> JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE,
> > FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON THIS 5TH DAY
> OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA
> > JOCELYN SHAW 863 EAST WESTMORELAND
> ST. PHILADELPHIA, PA
> > 19134 (PREVIOUS ADDRESS OF WHICH
> COMPLAINT WAS SUBMITTED:PO
> > BOX 5147, TAMPA, FLORIDA
> 33657-5175) FRAUD ON THE COURT TO
> > COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS
> INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM ATTACHED
> > DOCUMENT TO THE FLORIDA BAR PARTY
> TO THE COMPLAINT: AGAINST
> > THE ATTORNEY(S) FLORIDA BAR
> MEMBER(S): SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ
> > 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS
> GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA
> > HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN
> 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS
> > MACKEY GAL- Ana Elena
> Tangel-Rodriguez Eligible to Practice
> > Law in Florida Bar Number: 254304
> > Address:Tangel-Rodriguez and
> Associates Tangel-Rodriguez
> > & Assoc 222 Weber St Orlando,
> FL 32803-3831 United
> > States Office: 407-849-1133
> Email:cselsp@att.net
> > Personal Bar URL:
> www.floridabar.org/mybarprofile/254304
> > RUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ,
> Esquire= Retained 407-786-2889(
> > 1110 Douglas > Ave >
> Altamonte Springs, FL> 32714
> > > (407)> 786-2889 > http://www.russellhlaw.com THE SPECIFIC THING OR
> THINGS
> > I AM COMPLAINING ABOUT ARE: 18
> U.S.C. §§ 241, 242). "Color
> > of law" simply means that the
> person doing the act is using
> > power given to him or her by a
> governmental agency (local,
> > State, or Federal). A law
> enforcement officer acts "under
> > color of law" even if he or she is
> exceeding his or her
> > rightful power. THAT ON THE ONSET
> OF PROCEEDINGS DATED
> > 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA SHAW, AS
> THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE
> > DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION 7,
> ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT:
> > Juvenile Division 2000 E. Michigan
> St.Suite 300 Orlando, FL
> > 32806 PROCEEDINGS (WAIVED NOTICE
> OF OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD
> > TO BE IN WRITING- WAIVED BY THE
> JUDGE) WERE COMMENCED
> > WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE
> PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE
> > HISTORICAL DATA AND CONCURRENT
> CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS, AND
> > HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS
> CONCURRENTLY PUBLISHED IN DIVISION
> > 42 COURT, VIA CLERK OF THE ORANGE
> COUNTY CLERK OF COURT,
> > MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE RECORDS
> MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE
> > RISS DATABASE, THE DEPARTMENT OF
> CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR
> > ACCOUNTS OF INTERAGENCY ACCESS
> WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
> > OF REVENUE. THE COMPLAINANT MAKES
> REFERENCE THAT THE
> > ATTORNEY’S, WITH KNOWLEDGE,
> ACTED IN A DECEITFUL MANNER,
> > NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION FOR THE
> PURPOSE OF FRAUD RELATIVE
> > TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF JUDICIAL
> PROCEEDINGS. Fraud Title 42,
> > U.S.C., Section 14141: makes it
> unlawful for state or local
> > law enforcement agencies to allow
> officers to engage in a
> > pattern or practice of conduct
> that deprives persons of
> > rights protected by the
> Constitution or laws of the United
> > States. This law is commonly
> referred to as the Police
> > Misconduct Statute. the exintimate
> partner and public
> > officer employee misconduct
> BUSINESS TORT
> > RELATED-ADVERSARIAL TORTS OR
> MATERNAL INJURIES WITH INTENT
> > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer_29.html
> > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/any-police-department-receiving-federal.html
> > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/family-violence-prevention-act-victim.html
> > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/false-cpi-personal-torts-tort-of-fraud.html
> > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/jarrid-williams-probation-dc-346801.html
> > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/201
> > Federal laws Federal law 42 U.S.C.
> § 5772 & 42
> > U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law (42
> U.S.C. § 5772) defines a
> > "missing child" as "any individual
> less than 18 years of age
> > whose whereabouts are unknown to
> such individual"s legal
> > custodian." RE: CF OPERATING
> PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI,
> > PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD
> Section 39.205, Florida
> > Statutes (F.S.) states what the
> department has to do
> > concerning false reporting for
> children and Section 415.111,
> > F.S. addresses with false
> reporting for adults. "ESSENTIAL
> > REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW WERE
> DIVESTED AND SUBSEQUENT LEGAL
> > CAUSATION INCLUSIVE OF : 1. A
> MATERIAL INJURY IN THE
> > PROCEEDINGS BELOW THAT CANNOT BE
> CONCLUDED ON POST JUDGEMENT
> > APPEAL,2. INJURY WAS CAUSED BY A
> DEPARTURE FORM THE
> > ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW
> (WHEN THEY ARE VIOLATED)
> > OCCURRED. IMPROPER PURPOSE USED TO
> ACCESS TO THE
> > FACILITY/HARASSMENT & TORTS)
> CONTINUATION OF
> > PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT Fw:
> REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE
> > ACTION TO REOPEN CASE CASE NO
> 2005-DR-014270-O DIVISION 42;
> > Fw: ATTN KEITH PARKS Action
> founded on negligence, fraud and
> > white collar criminal behavior
> 39.0141 A Missing Children
> > Report is Required and is found to
> be absent in all
> > proceedings prior to date. &
> 95.11 Tort actions for
> > fraud or assault &
> 39.0014,39.0141 MISSING CHILDRENS
> > REPORT REQUIRED WHICH IN ITS
> ABSENCE AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF
> > PROCEEDINGS CONSTITUTES FRAUD.
> TORT ACTIONS OF FRAUD
> > INCLUSIVE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND
> VAWA BY THE FATHERS TO
> > CASE WHO KNEW THE ALLEGATIONS WERE
> FALSE THE ATTORNEY’S TO
> > CASE DID NOT CONSOLIDATE THE TWO
> DIVISIONS, DIVISION 7 AND
> > DIVISION 42, WITH KNOWLEDGE THAT A
> “THRESHOLD OF
> > DEMONSTRATIVE SHOWING OF FINANCIAL
> SUPPORT” IN ADDITION TO
> > THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A
> RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CHILD WOULD BE
> > NECESSARY UNDER PROVISIONS
> OUTLINED REGARDING MINORS TO
> > JUVENILE DEPENDENCY COURT CIVIL
> RULES OF PRACTICE, FLORIDA
> > STATUTES CHAPTER 39. PROCEEDINGS
> RELATING TO CHILDREN THE
> > DEVASTATION FROM THE PRESIDING
> RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL
> > PROCESS ALONG WITH THE STANDARDS
> OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT,
> > ATTORNEY DECEIT INCLUDED THE
> FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS: §
> > 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. Civil
> contempt is conduct directed
> > against the rights of the opposing
> party law-imposed
> > obligation ;"an act or omission
> tending to obstruct or
> > interfere with the orderly
> administration of justice, or to
> > impair the dignity of the court or
> respect for its
> > authority. There are two kinds,
> direct and constructive."
> > 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct
> contempt openly and in the
> > presence of the court, resists the
> power of the court, 102
> > A. 400, 406; and consequential, or
> constructive contempt
> > results from matters outside the
> court, such as failure to
> > comply with orders. The basic
> standards governing fraud on
> > the court are reasonably
> straightforward. As set forth in
> > Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 47
> (Fla. 5th DCA 1998): The
> > requisite fraud on the court
> occurs where “it can be
> > demonstrated, clearly and
> convincingly, that a party has
> > sentiently set in motion some
> unconscionable scheme
> > calculated to interfere with the
> judicial system’s ability
> > impartially to adjudicate a matter
> by improperly influencing
> > the trier of fact or unfairly
> hampering the presentation of
> > the opposing party’s claim or
> defense.” Aoude v. Mobil
> > Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118
> (1st Cir. 1989) . . . . The
> > trial court has the inherent
> authority, within the exercise
> > of sound judicial discretion, to
> dismiss an action when a
> > plaintiff has perpetrated a fraud
> on the court, or where a
> > party refuses to comply with court
> orders. Kornblum v.
> > Schneider, 609 So. 2d 138, 139
> (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).
> > CONCURRENT PROCEEDINGS THAT POSED
> A BIAS IN SUBSEQUENT CHILD
> > CUSTODY PROCEEDINGS IN THE
> JUVENILLE COURT 7TH DISTRICT
> > ORANGE COUNTY COURTS Duty to
> report misconduct; code of
> >
> conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228
> > THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER
> ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651
> > EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE,
> FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON
> > THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA
> JOCELYN SHAW PARTY TO THE
> > COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S)
> FLORIDA BAR MEMBER(S):
> > SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR
> ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD
> > LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498
> AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC
> > TIBON DORIS MACKEY GAL- “IN THE
> BEST INTERESTS OFTHE
> > CHILD”, THE CHILD HAS THE RIGHT
> TO EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER
> > THE LAW/WHEREAS THE OMISSIONS
> RELATIVE TO THE CASE
> > PROCEEDINGS PRESENTED A BIAS AND
> NONDISCLOSURE OF EXISTING
> > DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CONCURRENT WITH
> PROCEEDINGS WHICH AFFECTED
> > THE CHILD, THE ECONOMIC
> DIVESTATION FROM FINANCIAL SUPPORT,
> > LEGALLY DEFINED WITHIN THE MODEL
> POLICY OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
> > THAT THERE EXISTS ECONOMIC TORTS
> AND ABUSE REGARDING
> > INTENTIONAL REFUSAL TO SUPPORT THE
> CHILD OF WHICH PATERNITY
> > HAD BEEN ESTABLISHED 5 (5 X 365
> DAYS) IN THE CASE OF CARLOS
> > GONZALEZ AND IN THE CASE OF JARRID
> DESHAUN WILLIAMS THAT
> > P0ROCEEDING WERE ON THE JUDICIAL
> CALENDAR IN THE NINTH
> > DISTRICT COURT WITH A WITHDRAWAL
> ON FEBRAURY 14TH 2011
> > (COINCIDENTALLY AFTER THE ISSUANCE
> OF A TEMPORARY
> > MODIFICATION OF CHILD CUSTODY,
> COINCIDENTALLY AFTER A CHILD
> > SUPPORT PAYMENT TO THE FLORIDA
> STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT BY
> > CARLOS GONZALEZ IN JANUARY FOR THE
> MONTY OF JANUARY 2011,
> > AFTER THE FINAL JUDGEMENT FOR A
> CURRENT SUPPORT ORDER HAD
> > BEEN ISSUED DECEMBER 22ND, 2010)
> VIOLATIONS INCLUDE:
> > ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING
> CRIMINAL NON SUPPORT &
> > CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY ACT
> VIOLATION(COLLECTION AND
> > DISTRIBUTION OF CHILD SUPPORT
> PAYMENTS- TITLE 42, FEDERAL
> > CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION LAWS,
> SOCIAL SECURITY ACT
> > 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING
> JUDICIAL
> > MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW
> VIOLATIONS: REQUIREMENT OF
> > STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED PROCEDURES
> TO IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS
> > OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT Sec.
> 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] (a)
> > In order to satisfy section
> 454(20)(A), each State must have
> > in effect laws requiring the use
> of the following
> > procedures, consistent with this
> section and with
> > regulations of the Secretary, to
> increase the effectiveness
> > of the program which the State
> administers under this part:
> > Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] (a (C)
> Voluntary paternity
> > acknowledgment.— (iv) Use of
> paternity acknowledgment
> > affidavit. —Such procedures must
> require the State to
> > develop and use an affidavit for
> the voluntary
> > acknowledgment of paternity which
> includes the minimum
> > requirements of the affidavit
> specified by the Secretary
> > under section 452(a)(7) for the
> voluntary acknowledgment of
> > paternity, and to give full faith
> and credit to such an
> > affidavit signed in any other
> State according to its
> > procedures. Heather Morcroft
> (Appellate Atty) 20 n Orange
> > Ave Ste 700 Orlando 32801 FBN
> 0709859 407-325-3585 Letter
> > regarding fraud on the court,
> absent administrative remedy
> > or action in a timely manner, that
> such a biasedness
> > occurred it is described as
> unconscionably ethnically
> > biased, a white collar criminal
> act by a party who misused
> > his/her office to aid and assist
> avoidance of judicial
> > action, that the action was in
> violation of the minor to
> > case’s rights, that the action
> was in violation of
> > parental rights to recovery of
> child support and paternity
> > establishment in the Orange
> County, Ninth Judicial Circuit
> > and Court, Division 42. Sent:
> Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:39
> > PM Subject: ATTORNEY GENERAL
> COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST
> > Hershkowitz Russell S Attorney
> Category: Bankruptcy Law
> > [Edit] 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte
> Springs, FL 32714 (407)
> > 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com Thank you for contacting
> the
> > Attorney General's Office
> regarding ATTORNEY
> > MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL
> NONSUPPORT . Our staff will
> > process it as soon as possible
> and, if necessary, respond
> > appropriately. We appreciate
> hearing from concerned citizens
> > such as yourself. If you wish to
> keep abreast of the
> > activities of this office, you may
> wish to consider a
> > subscription to our electronic
> newsletter Weekly Briefing.
> > Or perhaps our Consumer Alerts.
> Should you wish to subscribe
> > to either, or both, publications,
> please visit our
> > subscription page. COMPLAINT FILED
> AGAINST RUSSELL SCOTT
> > HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire= Retained
> 407-786-2889( 1110 Douglas
> > Ave Altamonte Springs, FL 32714
> (407) 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com COMMENT
> ENTERED ON FEBRUARY
> > 14TH, 2011- OSCE FL DEPT OF
> REVENUE PETITIONED THE COURT TO
> > WITHDRAW THE MOTION TO RECOVER
> BACK OWED OR RETROACTIVE
> > CHILD SUPPORT SUBSEQUENT TO
> JUVENILE PROCEEDINGS. THE STATED
> > MOTIONS STATES “THAT THE
> REPRESENTATION IS BEING WITHDRAWN
> > AND THE PETITION IS WITHDRAWN DUE
> TO “QUESTIONABLE
> > ARREARAGES OWED”- A BIASED
> STATEMENT WITHOU INQUIRY AND
> > PRESENTATION OF THE FACTS OF
> RECORD AVAILABLE TO ALL FL
> > DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND
> FAMILIES- FLORIDA- LEGAL SERVICES
> > FOR CHILDREN, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
> DIVISION, AND FL DEPT OF
> > REV. CHILD SUPPORT DIV.- THE
> ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT
> > REGISTER OF ACTIONS MAINTAINS ALL
> PARTIES TO THE CASE(S)
> > PATERNITY AND CHILD SUPPORT
> HISTORICAL DATA, ADMINISTRATIVE
> > ORDERS- WHICH ARE ABSENT IN
> PROCEEDINGS CONSTITUTING
> > UNCONSCIONABLE DELAYS – IN THE
> CASE OF CARLOS GONZALEZ –
> > THE PATERNITY CASE LASTED BETWEEN
> 2002 – 2006- RESUMING
> > WITH A FILING OF PATERNITY CASE
> NUMBER IN 2005 FOR THE
> > JUDGEMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT WHICH
> WE DO NOT SEE ENTERED AS A
> > FINANL JUDGEMENT UNTIL DECEBMER
> 22, 2010- A PERIOD BETWEEN
> > 2005-2010 (FIVE YEARS – DELAYED
> ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS-
> > ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT) VAWA REPORT
> REGARDING NOT ONLY ATTORNEY
> > MISCONDUCT IN CHILD CUSTODY
> MODIFICATION Intentionally
> > omitted criminal nonsupport,
> offensive behaviour,
> > professional misconduct and ethnic
> biasedness, child
> > exploitation and institutional
> racism Title 42 section 42
> > 1983, 14141 attorney prosecutorial
> child chustody
> > exploitation including false
> statements never heard
> > throughout case trial activity,
> false statements to commence
> > proceedings Case Type:Paternity
> Date Filed:4/24/2002
> > Location:Div 38
> UCN:482002DR006249A001OX Judge: Patricia A
> > Doherty BARBARA FANCHER (LIMITED)
> JONES, > Esquire >
> > Retained 407-849-1133(W) >
> Respondent GONZALEZ, CARLOS
> > ALBERTO > Events & Orders
> of > the Court
> > DISPOSITIONS > 05/15/2012 >
> Order Denying (Judicial
> > > Officer: Evans, Robert M) CC:
> ACAP/THE
> > REGIONAL/DISTRICT & OIG DID
> NOT COMPLY WITH OR THE WAS A
> > FAILURE TO REPORT ( https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/report-fraud/) attached
> > ethical complaint form regarding
> FL CPI CERTIFICATION FOR
> > MISCONDUCT COMPLAINTS; Fw:
> ORGANIZED CRIME BETWEEN ATTYS FI
> > FL DCF, GAL, CPI WHO INTENTIONAL
> COMMITTED FRAUDS, EMPLOYEE
> > MISCONDUCT, PERSONALITY TORTS
> & FRAUD TO COMMENCE
> > PROCEEDINGS IN COURT HARSSMENT
> DURING THE MOTHER AND NATURAL
> > PARENT'S POSTSECONDARY ENROLLMENT
> & THEREAFTER DURING
> > EMPLOYABILITY RECRUITING, LIBELOUS
> STATEMENT WERE MADE WHICH
> > HAVE NO VALIDITY WHILE ABSCOUNDING
> CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT &
> > RECOVERY OF RETROACTIVE CHILD
> SUPPORT)Fw: COMPLAINT RE: GAL
> > PERFORMANCE AND CONDUCT/ DORIS
> MACKEY REPRESENTING FL GAL
> > ORANGE COUNTY COMPLAINT INCLUDES
> THAT THE GAL REPRESENTATIVE
> > ALSO KNEW ABOUT HISTORICAL DATA
> OMITTED FROM TESTIMONY Fw:
> > (CASE DP1140 DIV 7/OMITTED:
> INTENTIONAL BIASEDNESS
> > concurrent court proceedings FL
> DCF KNEW ABOUT :NINTH
> > DISTRICT HISTORICAL DATA DIV 38/42
> PRECEEDING CLAIM BY DCF
> > CPI FELICIA HANDLEY 2005DR14270
> 08-24-2004 Petition for
> > paternity entered Service denied
> 09-24-2004 Petition to
> > establish paternity denied
> Respondent petitioned to dismiss
> > paternity 11-08-2004 05-05-2006
> Final judgment granted on
> > paternity 10-19-2010 Final
> judgment for child support
> > entered 10-22-2010 Order for
> income deduction 11-29-2010
> > Notice of change of address
> 12-28-2010 Petition heard to
> > establish child support 01-14-2011
> Returned mail 01-04-2011
> > Motion to set arrears entered
> 01-04-2011 Notice and hearing
> > 02-14-2011 Hearing to set arrears
> 01/28/2011 Plaintiff
> > petitions for the need for custody
> denied 02/04/2011) Fw:
> > Attorney
> Misconduct/Resubmitted/Attorney Details Needed Per
> > Request PROSECUTOR’S ROLE IN
> ADDRESSING SUSPECTED LAW
> > ENFORCEMENT MISCONDUCT (a) If the
> prosecutor has reason to
> > suspect misconduct or unauthorized
> illegal activity at any
> > level of the prosecutor’s office
> or in any agency or
> > department engaged in a criminal
> investigation, the
> > prosecutor should promptly report
> the suspicion and the
> > reason for it to appropriate
> supervisory personnel in the
> > prosecutor’s office who have
> authority to address the
> > problem, or to the appropriate
> inspector general’s office,
> > or similar agency, if reporting
> within the prosecutor’s
> > own office is problematic.
> Reporting may also be required to
> > comply with requirements of the
> applicable rules of
> > professional conduct, the Model
> Rules and the law of the
> > jurisdiction. Sheila Jocelyn Shaw
> %{attach}
> >
> > Attorney misconduct. Florida Duty
> to
> > report misconduct; code of conduct
> The duty to report
> > misconduct is one of the ethical o
> imposed on attorneys in
> > the United States by the rules
> governing professional
> > responsibility. With certain
> exceptions, an attorney who
> > becomes aware that either a fellow
> attorney or a judge has
> > committed an act in violation of
> the rules of ethical
> > conduct must report that
> violation. Failure to do so
> > subjects the attorney failing to
> make the report to
> > discipline.The duty extends only
> to actual knowledge
> > possessed by an attorney. An
> attorney who has a mere
> > suspicion of misconduct is not
> required to report that
> > suspicion, nor is the attorney
> required to conduct any sort
> > of investigation to confirm or
> dispel that suspicion. The
> > conduct at issue must rise to the
> level of misconduct under
> > the rules of professional
> responsibility. Thus, an attorney
> > who witnesses another attorney
> become intoxicated, engage in
> > adultery, or gamble away a large
> sum of money is under no
> > duty to report these acts because
> they are not prohibited by
> > the rules of professional
> responsibility. Conduct that must
> > be reported, on the other hand,
> includes matters such as
> > breaching client confidentiality,
> misusing client funds,
> > tampering with evidence, suborning
> perjury, offering bribes,
> > and committing criminal acts of
> violence or dishonesty. https://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228
> > 8-2.241 Civil Laws Governing Law
> Enforcement Misconduct
> > BUT ALSO LAWS THAT ARE FOR THE
> PREVENTION OF NEGLECT OF THE
> > CHILD. 827.03 Abuse, aggravated
> abuse, and neglect of a
> > child; penalties.— All
> historical case proceedings
> > associated with FL Dept of Rev.
> Child Support
> > Enforcement/TANF participation
> & Medicaid participation
> > relative to court proceedings were
> filed and available
> > including court filings and shared
> RISs regional information
> > sharing system btwn OCSE & DCF
> departments; FL DCF Case
> > #9457320158 (RFA CASE NUMBER
> 1143172973) Ineffective
> > counsel/representation,fraud to
> commence proceedings FL ACAP
> > Complaint ATTY DECEIT,
> goo.gl/h9wjQr SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221
> > CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498,
> COLLUSION #OIG #fraud, PUBLIC LAW
> > 108 - 21 #misconduct atty
> deceit,collusion;Case No.
> > 2002-DR-050423-I,IVD case
> enforcement FL/PA/IN #misconduct,
> > cases OC9901243 PA &
> 02-83719047104532 PA Cause #
> > 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL
> 2010-DP 1170 FL CASE#s
> > #misconduct,professional
> misconduct cases:OC9901243 PA &
> > 02-83719047104532 PA Cause #
> 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472
> > FL 2010-DP 1170 FL IN CASE #s