Hate Crimes. Involving Attorney Intentional Deceit & Misconduct 're: MULTIPLE duties(including no attempt at recourse regarding the error) Public Records Law. This law provides that any records made or received by any public agency in the course of its official business are available for inspection, unless specifically exempted by the Florida Legislature.following elements were satisfied: Duty, Breach of Duty, Cause in Fact Proximate Cause,Damages "d) All counsel of record in any case have a continuing duty promptly to inform the Court and counsel of the existence of any other case within the purview of this rule, as well as the existence of any similar or related case or proceeding pending before any other court or administrative agency."Fraud” means to commit an intentional violation of law or a deliberate misrepresentation or concealment so as to secure unfair or unlawful financial or personal gain. "(1)...An "objective standard of reasonableness" and (2) "a reasonabl

 

FOR BACKGROUND CHECKS, ASSESSMENTS G17259; Jarrid Deshaun

 Williams--SUBSTANCE ABUSE CLAUSE

Re: FRAUD 

(5617503201, FELICIA HANDLEY

an "objective standard of reasonableness" and (2) "a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different." 

"Fraud” means to commit an intentional violation of law or a deliberate misrepresentation or 

concealment so as to secure unfair or unlawful financial or personal gain.

Fraud

Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141: makes it unlawful for state or local law enforcement agencies to allow officers to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives persons of rights protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. This law is commonly referred to as the Police Misconduct Statute.

Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false

reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses wdith false reporting for adults.

improper purpose 

MISUSE OF OFFICE,775.0844 Aggravated white collar

crime § 112.313(8

(§ 3. Battery: Definition of Offensive Contact

A contact is offensive within the meaning of § 1(c)(ii) if:

(a) the contact is offensive to a reasonable sense of personal dignity; or

(b) the contact is highly offensive to the other’s unusually sensitive sense of personal dignity, and

(i) the actor knows to a substantial certainty that the contact will be highly offensive to the other; or
(ii) the actor contacts the other with the purpose that the contact will be highly offensive.)

9457320158 (RFA CASE NUMBER 1143172973)The third type is a fraudulent misrepresentation. A fraudulent misrepresentation is a statement that the defendant made knowing it was false or that the defendant made recklessly to induce the other party to enter a contract. The injured party can seek to void to contract and recover damages from the defendant

FURTHER LIBEL AND DEFAMATION RELATED TO FAMILY VIOLENCE-DATING VIOLENCE AND CORPORATE MISCONDUCT. TAMPA BAY TIMES USED IN DEFAMATORY ATTACK AGAINST ME AND THE CHANGE IN CHILD CUSTODY RELATED TO A FALSE PARENTAL ABDUCTION REPORT.   Fwd: Fraud/acts of commission under fraud to commit defiant trespassing fwd: Never was issued an adult guardianship or power of attorney in any court nor was there such a proceeding. Several friends thereof instigated a harassment scam involving stalking and false reports. Fwd: (forwarding to adult protection services/suspicious activities financial scams and economic TORTS to hijack mail, taxes or other financial documents thereof a family member) harassment circumventing an exintimate PARTNER-hate CRIMES and faith based scam to aid PRIVACY TORTS -GUARDIANSHIP fraud and nuisance violence Victim services

COMPLAINTS to the FL DCF OIG KEITH PARKS & GAL (Alan.Abramowitz@gal.fl.gov)

Whereas HOW DOES THE GUARDIAN AT LITEM OFFICE NOT ADDRESS A "MISSING CHILD ALLEGATION"? DORIS MACKEY REPRESENTING THE ORANGE COUNTY FLORIDA OFFICE- NEVER SAID A WORD IN THE INTERESTS OF THE CHILDREN REGARDING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE BY THE FATHERS (NO VOLUTARILY "WILL" TO SIGN ANY FORM OF DOCUMENT -A SHORT LETTER-INFORMAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BTWN MOM & DAD OR MENTION THAT THERE HAD BEEN SUCH OPPORTUNITIES - INFORMATION THAT COULD HAVE BEEN MADE OF RECORD TO THE COULD IF THEY ASKED THE DADS ANYTHING. BOTH DADS CAME TO THE JUVENILE COURT AFTER THE PREVIOUS DAY OF POLICE ASSISTING PICKING UP THE MINOR CHILDREN -TAKING THEM OUT OF THE MOM'S PHYSICAL CUSTODY WITHOUT ANY POLICE STATEMENT OR MATERIAL FACTS THAT A PARENTAL ABDUCTION HAD OCCURRED.   IN FACT HANDLEY PREARRANGED THE PRESENCE OF THE DADS BY CALLING JARRID WILLIAMS AND CARLOS ALBERTO GONZALEZ FROM HER OFFICE (WITH THE INTENT TO DETAIN THE CHILDREN OVERNIGHT GIVING TEMPORARY CUSTODY WITH COURT DECREE -ADMINISTRATIVE DECREE OVERNIGHT) HOURS BEFORE THE SURPRISE ARRIVAL AT THE MOTHER'S RESIDENCE WHEREAS I WAS TOLD I WOULD FIND OUT WHY WHEN WE GET TO COURT IN THE MORNING.

I FIND IT HARD TO BELIEVE THAT WITH THE COURT CALENDAR DATES SO NEAR AND THE TOPIC OR SUBJECT OF THE COURT HEARINGS THAT AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER CHANGING CUSTODY WOULD HAVE BEEN GIVEN TO FELICIA HANDLEY AT THAT TIME.

These same lawyers and FL DCF EMPLOYEES WHO HAD A HISTORY & NARRATIVE EXCLUDED MATERIAL FACTS REGARDING THE DADS PRIOR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CHILD, FAMILY VIOLENCE AND DATING VIOLENCE WHEREAS THEY DID NOT REASONIBLY SUSPECT THAT THERE WOULD A FAIR OR VOLUNTARILY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARENTS SUCH AS PARENTAL TIME SHARING, EVEN AFTER TWO ATTEMPTS WERE FILED IN THE LIDIA GARDNER COURTS, BOTH DADS WOULD NOT VOLUNTARILY SIGN ANYTHING THAT WOULD RELEASE THE CHILD TO THEIR MOTHER ON VISITATION GROUNDS, SUMMER OR HOLIDAY VACATIONS, -RETALIATORY ADVERSARIAL ACTIONS AFTER THERE HAD BEEN NO SUCH PARENTAL ALIENATION TOWARDS EITHER DAD.

THEN THE SPOUSE OF THE DAD WENT SO FAR AS TO BRAG ABOUT BENEFITS SHE WAS GETTING AFTER THE MODIFICATION OF CUSTODY - NO RELATIONSHIP HAD EVER EXISTED VOLUNTARILY BY THE DAD & SPOUSE AS FAR AS CORRESPONDENCE, FINANCIAL SUPPORT ETC IT WAS ABUSIVE LITIGATION FROM THE START IN 2002 WITH 

Abusive litigation, housing laws violations, family violence attacks at Harbor House, Martin's Landings Apts., The Reserve Apts at Lake Orlando (problems with buddy systems access to the dwelling & illegal entries, damage & theft of property.

Complaint was forwarded to the 

To: <Director@gal.fl.gov>

Re: CONSPIRACY IN FRAUD, HATE CRIMES, ECONOMIC TORTS, VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN & CHILDREN,  & JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT WHICH SUBSEQUENT CONTINUING DATING VIOLENCE AND FAMILY VIOLENCE WAS ENABLED WITH MALICIOUS INTENT.

THIS GUY NOT ONLY COMMITTED DERROGATORY PERSONALITY TORTS IN OUR FAMILY LAW CASE, HE AND SEVERAL OTHERS MADE THIS A "GLOBAL-NATIONAL" FALSE REPORT -SHE INTENDED TO RUIN ANY KIND OF BACKGROUND CHECK I HAD AND ELIMINATE SOCIAL AND FAMILY SUPPORT WITH SUCH AN OUTRAGEOUS LIE ALONG WITH BATTERIES RESULTING FROM LIES OR MISCONSTRUYED DETAILS OF A JUVENILE CASE WHICH OTHER ADVERSARIED EXPLOITED NOT ONLY IN ORANGE COUNTY IN 2011- THEY FOLLOWED (THIRD PARTIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE MINOR'S FATHER WHO WERE PARTICIPATING IN ABUSIVE LITIGATION AND SURVEILLANCE ANNOYANCES ASSOCIATED WITH GANG STALKING WHEN THE COMPLAINTS WERE MADE TO THE OFFICE OF CIVIL AFFAIRS,  AMBER HIKES, & THE DC PATROL OFFICER IN PHILADELPHIA COUNTY) ME TO HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FL, TO CAMDEN COUNTY, NJ AND PHILADELPHIA COUNTY -

PROBLEM- MONITORING - ABUSIVE SURVEILLANCE WHICH WAS NOT APART OF ANY COURT JUDGEMENT ISSUED IN FEBRUARY OF 2011 OR AUGUST 30TH OF 2011. THIS PROBLEM CONTINUED AFTER AUGUST OF 2011 AND AFTER I MOVED OUT OF THE ORANGE COUNTY JURISDICTION TO PHILADELPHIA COUNTY- ABUSIVE LITIGATION.

Doris Mackey GAL Case Coordinator (Team Leader Division 7)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Re: FRAUD 

 

 

(5617503201, FELICIA HANDLEY, ORANGE COUNTY, FL CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department

Federal laws Federal law 42 U.S.C. § 5772 & 42 U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5772) defines a "missing child" as "any individual less than 18 years of age whose whereabouts are unknown to such individual"s legal custodian)

 

 

 

RELATING TO "job -duty-task description -misconduct in fraud-aggravated white collar criminal torts- the very first page indicated the allegation which was never spoken in regards throughout the case a highly prejudicial allegations (in Felicia Handley's Order of  Arraignment" statement- FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS WHEREAS DISCLOSURE OF THE FRAUD WOULD HAVE GRANTED A DISMISSAL -AGAIN AFTER THE JANUARY 28,2011 DISMISSAL BY JUDGE ANTHONY JOHNSON -prior to a request to change judge/based on background profiles  to  Donald E Grincewicz  who also disregarded the fraudulent "missing child" statement but acted in Accord to case histories resulting in a change of parents custody-  clearly a precedent case tactic in abating child support recovery of more than 100 months of abscent financial support of the child- ALSO EXPOSING FRIVILOUS LITIGATION AN ABUSIVE LITIGATION TACTIC TO EVADE CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT DISBURSEMENTS WHICH BEGAN AS THE RESULT OF THE DECEMBER 22,2010 JUDGEMENT ORDER AGAINST ONE OF THE CHILDREN'S DADS) with particular regards to abusive litigation tactics, gender violence and domestic violence. The GAL ad Litem "case coordinator" concealed information that I am sure she had available to her regarding "related cases- parties in the case where the same parties in concurrent family law cases in another ninth district division that held historical data relating to a pattern of judicial misconduct, paternity & child support proceedings filed in the Orange County Clerk of Courts-maintained in the Records Management Division, RISS database, FL Dept of Revenue Child Support records and foremost FL DCF RFA case histories on both children. 

 

 

 

Barbara Tanner Jones & Tangel-Rodriguez & Associates 222 Weber St, Orlando, FL 32803      Bar Number: 391956  Mail Address: Tangel-Rodriguez & Assoc 222 Weber St Orlando, FL 32803-3831  United States  Office: 407-849-1133  Cell: 407-849-1133      

SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS MACKEY Heather Morcroft (Appellate Atty) 20 n Orange Ave Ste 700 Orlando 32801 FBN 0709859 407-325-3585 Attorney for Jarrid D. Williams Carlos Alberto Gonzalez Bar Number: 656755 Mail Address: Wayne Starr P.A. PO Box 560206 Orlando, FL 32856-0206 United States Office: 407-228-7280 Fax: 407-228-4296 Email: waynestarr@cfl.rr.com

Case# 482005DR014270A001OX)  THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300    (KNOWLEDGE OF FRAUD AND INTENTIINAL OMISSIIN BY THE OTHER ATTYS - ". As an officer of the court, a lawyer cannot have his client perjure himself on the stand, that is, if that lawyer knows it is a lie. Otherwise, a lawyer would be perpetuating fraud upon the court. At that point, the lawyer is under an obligation to withdraw from the case (according to the rules of professional conduct). The lawyer is not required to divulge the reason for the withdrawal, in fact, it is improper to disclose such reasons due to attorney/client privilege but it would usually give the judge a good clue based on timing of the withdrawal. In short, a lawyer cannot stand by and watch the client lie to the court...."

Complaint (5617503201, FELICIA HANDLEY, ORANGE COUNTY, FL CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department

Federal laws Federal law 42 U.S.C. § 5772 & 42 U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5772) defines a "missing child" as "any individual less than 18 years of age whose whereabouts are unknown to such individual"s legal custodian

, that such a biasedness occurred it is described as unconscionably ethnically biased, a white collar criminal act by a party who misused his/her office to aid and assist avoidance of judicial action, that the action was in violation of the minor to case’s rights, that the action was in violation of parental rights to recovery of child support and paternity establishment in the Orange County, Ninth Judicial Circuit and Court, Division 42. Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:39 PM Subject: ATTORNEY GENERAL COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST Hershkowitz Russell S Attorney Category: Bankruptcy Law [Edit] 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 

CONTINUING WHITE COLLAR CRIME AND MOCKERIES OF PRIVACY RIGHTS, ANNOYANCES TO BENEFIT THE EXINTIMATE PARTNERS.

A

All counsel of record in any case have a continuing duty promptly to inform the Court and counsel of the existence of any other case within the purview of this rule, as well as the existence of any similar or related case or proceeding pending before any other court or administrative agency.

US Courts (.gov) 

Rule 1.04 - Similar or Successive Cases; Duty of Counsel | Middle ...

Access Device Correspondence

"Access device" means any card, plate, code, account number, electronic serial number, mobile identification number, personal identification number, or other telecommunications service, equipment, or instrument identifier, or other means of account access that can be used, alone or in conjunction with another access device, to obtain money, goods, services, or any other thing of value

http://archive.flsenate.gov/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0800-0899/0817/Sections/0817.568.html

(f) “Personal identification information” means any name or number that may be used, alone or in conjunction with any other information, to identify a specific individual, including any:

1. Name, postal or electronic mail address, telephone number, social security number, date of birth, mother’s maiden name, official state-issued or United States-issued driver’s license or identification number, alien registration number, government passport number, employer or taxpayer identification number, Medicaid or food assistance account number, bank account number, credit or debit card number, or personal identification number or code assigned to the holder of a debit card by the issuer to permit authorized electronic use of such card;

2. Unique biometric data, such as fingerprint, voice print, retina or iris image, or other unique physical representation;

3. Unique electronic identification number, address, or routing code;

4. Medical records;

5. Telecommunication identifying information or access device; or

6. Other number or information that can be used to access a person’s financial resources.

defined white collar crimes as crime as a crime committed by persons of respectability and high social status in the course of their occupation. 1 The main categories of white collar crimes are bribery and corruption, food and drug adulteration, counterfeiting, forgery, tax evasion, cyber-crimes etc

For a crime to occur there must be an act of either commission or omission by the accused. can't be convicted of a crime due to your status. Causation (human conduct must cause harm) For a crime to have been committed, there must be a casual relationship between and act and the harm suffered.

An instance showing the difference between an act of omission and the commission of an act is the difference in withholding the truth and voicing a lie. Both an act committed and an act of omission can change the result of a circumstance.

An act of omission and an act of commission are ethical issues of both a secular and religious nature. There is a difference in moral theology between formal cooperation and material cooperation both with and without consent. When a person either aids in an evil act or does nothing to prevent that act, it is cooperation with evil


(Negligence leads to liability. If someone causes an automobile accident leading to grievous injuries to another person and he is found driving, while being drunk, it is clear that it is a case of negligence as careless conduct of the driver led to a situation that caused mishap. If a doctor, in his hurry, does not apply stitches to a injured person properly, these stitches may give way causing a lot of trouble for the victim. The doctor can be held guilty on counts of negligence as his inability to perform his duty diligently caused suffering of patient)

What is Fraud on the Court? Fraud on the Court, or Fraud upon the Court, is where a material misrepresentation has been made to the court, or by the court itself. The main requirement is that the impartiality of the court has been so disrupted that it can’t perform its tasks without bias or prejudice. Some examples of fraud on the court include: Fraud in the service of court summons (such as withholding a court summons from a party) Corruption or influence of a court member or official Judicial fraud Intentionally failing to inform the parties of necessary appointments or requirements, in efforts to obstruct the judicial process “Unconscionable” schemes to deceive or make misrepresentations through the court system It’s important to note that fraud on the court only involves court officials or officers of the court, such as judges or court-appointed attorneys. The fraud must be directed at the “judicial machinery” itself. Fraud on the court generally does NOT mean: Fraud between the two opposing parties Submission of fraudulent documents Perjury or false statements by witnesses

For the official who acted in fraud upon the court, they may very well be required to step down from their position and may even be subjected to criminal consequences like a fine or a jail sentence. It could also result in other serious consequences, such as an attorney being disbarred, or a judge being removed from service.

If a court official is found to be biased or prejudiced even before fraud occurs, they are required to excuse themselves from the case, and a different official must be appointed. In some jurisidictions, a trial tainted by fraud on the court will be vacated or set aside for a certain time period (such as two years), to be “reopened” at a later date.

What is Fraud on the Court? Fraud on the Court, or Fraud upon the Court, is where a material misrepresentation has been made to the court, or by the court itself. The main requirement is that the impartiality of the court has been so disrupted that it can’t perform its tasks without bias or prejudice. Some examples of fraud on the court include: Fraud in the service of court summons (such as withholding a court summons from a party) Corruption or influence of a court member or official Judicial fraud Intentionally failing to inform the parties of necessary appointments or requirements, in efforts to obstruct the judicial process “Unconscionable” schemes to deceive or make misrepresentations through the court system It’s important to note that fraud on the court only involves court officials or officers of the court, such as judges or court-appointed attorneys. The fraud must be directed at the “judicial machinery” itself. Fraud on the court generally does NOT mean: Fraud between the two opposing parties Submission of fraudulent documents Perjury or false statements by witnesses

For the official who acted in fraud upon the court, they may very well be required to step down from their position and may even be subjected to criminal consequences like a fine or a jail sentence. It could also result in other serious consequences, such as an attorney being disbarred, or a judge being removed from service.

If a court official is found to be biased or prejudiced even before fraud occurs, they are required to excuse themselves from the case, and a different official must be appointed. In some jurisidictions, a trial tainted by fraud on the court will be vacated or set aside for a certain time period (such as two years), to be “reopened” at a later date.