Wednesday, 12 August 2020

Hate Crimes. Involving Attorney Intentional Deceit & Misconduct 're: MULTIPLE duties(including no attempt at recourse regarding the error) Public Records Law. This law provides that any records made or received by any public agency in the course of its official business are available for inspection, unless specifically exempted by the Florida Legislature.following elements were satisfied: Duty, Breach of Duty, Cause in Fact Proximate Cause,Damages "d) All counsel of record in any case have a continuing duty promptly to inform the Court and counsel of the existence of any other case within the purview of this rule, as well as the existence of any similar or related case or proceeding pending before any other court or administrative agency."Fraud” means to commit an intentional violation of law or a deliberate misrepresentation or concealment so as to secure unfair or unlawful financial or personal gain. "(1)...An "objective standard of reasonableness" and (2) "a reasonabl

FOR BACKGROUND CHECKS, ASSESSMENTS G17259; Jarrid Deshaun

Williams--SUBSTANCE ABUSE CLAUSE

Re: FRAUD

(5617503201, FELICIA HANDLEY

an "objective standard of reasonableness" and (2) "a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different."

"Fraud” means to commit an intentional violation of law or a deliberate misrepresentation or

concealment so as to secure unfair or unlawful financial or personal gain.

Fraud

Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141: makes it unlawful for state or local law enforcement agencies to allow officers to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives persons of rights protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. This law is commonly referred to as the Police Misconduct Statute.

Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false

reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses wdith false reporting for adults.

improper purpose

MISUSE OF OFFICE,775.0844 Aggravated white collar

crime § 112.313(8

(§ 3. Battery: Definition of Offensive Contact

A contact is offensive within the meaning of § 1(c)(ii) if:

(a) the contact is offensive to a reasonable sense of personal dignity; or

(b) the contact is highly offensive to the other’s unusually sensitive sense of personal dignity, and

(i) the actor knows to a substantial certainty that the contact will be highly offensive to the other; or
(ii) the actor contacts the other with the purpose that the contact will be highly offensive.)

9457320158 (RFA CASE NUMBER 1143172973)The third type is a fraudulent misrepresentation. A fraudulent misrepresentation is a statement that the defendant made knowing it was false or that the defendant made recklessly to induce the other party to enter a contract. The injured party can seek to void to contract and recover damages from the defendant

FURTHER LIBEL AND DEFAMATION RELATED TO FAMILY VIOLENCE-DATING VIOLENCE AND CORPORATE MISCONDUCT. TAMPA BAY TIMES USED IN DEFAMATORY ATTACK AGAINST ME AND THE CHANGE IN CHILD CUSTODY RELATED TO A FALSE PARENTAL ABDUCTION REPORT. Fwd: Fraud/acts of commission under fraud to commit defiant trespassing fwd: Never was issued an adult guardianship or power of attorney in any court nor was there such a proceeding. Several friends thereof instigated a harassment scam involving stalking and false reports. Fwd: (forwarding to adult protection services/suspicious activities financial scams and economic TORTS to hijack mail, taxes or other financial documents thereof a family member) harassment circumventing an exintimate PARTNER-hate CRIMES and faith based scam to aid PRIVACY TORTS -GUARDIANSHIP fraud and nuisance violence Victim services

COMPLAINTS to the FL DCF OIG KEITH PARKS & GAL (Alan.Abramowitz@gal.fl.gov)

Whereas HOW DOES THE GUARDIAN AT LITEM OFFICE NOT ADDRESS A "MISSING CHILD ALLEGATION"? DORIS MACKEY REPRESENTING THE ORANGE COUNTY FLORIDA OFFICE- NEVER SAID A WORD IN THE INTERESTS OF THE CHILDREN REGARDING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE BY THE FATHERS (NO VOLUTARILY "WILL" TO SIGN ANY FORM OF DOCUMENT -A SHORT LETTER-INFORMAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BTWN MOM & DAD OR MENTION THAT THERE HAD BEEN SUCH OPPORTUNITIES - INFORMATION THAT COULD HAVE BEEN MADE OF RECORD TO THE COULD IF THEY ASKED THE DADS ANYTHING. BOTH DADS CAME TO THE JUVENILE COURT AFTER THE PREVIOUS DAY OF POLICE ASSISTING PICKING UP THE MINOR CHILDREN -TAKING THEM OUT OF THE MOM'S PHYSICAL CUSTODY WITHOUT ANY POLICE STATEMENT OR MATERIAL FACTS THAT A PARENTAL ABDUCTION HAD OCCURRED. IN FACT HANDLEY PREARRANGED THE PRESENCE OF THE DADS BY CALLING JARRID WILLIAMS AND CARLOS ALBERTO GONZALEZ FROM HER OFFICE (WITH THE INTENT TO DETAIN THE CHILDREN OVERNIGHT GIVING TEMPORARY CUSTODY WITH COURT DECREE -ADMINISTRATIVE DECREE OVERNIGHT) HOURS BEFORE THE SURPRISE ARRIVAL AT THE MOTHER'S RESIDENCE WHEREAS I WAS TOLD I WOULD FIND OUT WHY WHEN WE GET TO COURT IN THE MORNING.

I FIND IT HARD TO BELIEVE THAT WITH THE COURT CALENDAR DATES SO NEAR AND THE TOPIC OR SUBJECT OF THE COURT HEARINGS THAT AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER CHANGING CUSTODY WOULD HAVE BEEN GIVEN TO FELICIA HANDLEY AT THAT TIME.

These same lawyers and FL DCF EMPLOYEES WHO HAD A HISTORY & NARRATIVE EXCLUDED MATERIAL FACTS REGARDING THE DADS PRIOR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CHILD, FAMILY VIOLENCE AND DATING VIOLENCE WHEREAS THEY DID NOT REASONIBLY SUSPECT THAT THERE WOULD A FAIR OR VOLUNTARILY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARENTS SUCH AS PARENTAL TIME SHARING, EVEN AFTER TWO ATTEMPTS WERE FILED IN THE LIDIA GARDNER COURTS, BOTH DADS WOULD NOT VOLUNTARILY SIGN ANYTHING THAT WOULD RELEASE THE CHILD TO THEIR MOTHER ON VISITATION GROUNDS, SUMMER OR HOLIDAY VACATIONS, -RETALIATORY ADVERSARIAL ACTIONS AFTER THERE HAD BEEN NO SUCH PARENTAL ALIENATION TOWARDS EITHER DAD.

THEN THE SPOUSE OF THE DAD WENT SO FAR AS TO BRAG ABOUT BENEFITS SHE WAS GETTING AFTER THE MODIFICATION OF CUSTODY - NO RELATIONSHIP HAD EVER EXISTED VOLUNTARILY BY THE DAD & SPOUSE AS FAR AS CORRESPONDENCE, FINANCIAL SUPPORT ETC IT WAS ABUSIVE LITIGATION FROM THE START IN 2002 WITH

Abusive litigation, housing laws violations, family violence attacks at Harbor House, Martin's Landings Apts., The Reserve Apts at Lake Orlando (problems with buddy systems access to the dwelling & illegal entries, damage & theft of property.

Complaint was forwarded to the

To: <Director@gal.fl.gov>

Re: CONSPIRACY IN FRAUD, HATE CRIMES, ECONOMIC TORTS, VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN & CHILDREN, & JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT WHICH SUBSEQUENT CONTINUING DATING VIOLENCE AND FAMILY VIOLENCE WAS ENABLED WITH MALICIOUS INTENT.

THIS GUY NOT ONLY COMMITTED DERROGATORY PERSONALITY TORTS IN OUR FAMILY LAW CASE, HE AND SEVERAL OTHERS MADE THIS A "GLOBAL-NATIONAL" FALSE REPORT -SHE INTENDED TO RUIN ANY KIND OF BACKGROUND CHECK I HAD AND ELIMINATE SOCIAL AND FAMILY SUPPORT WITH SUCH AN OUTRAGEOUS LIE ALONG WITH BATTERIES RESULTING FROM LIES OR MISCONSTRUYED DETAILS OF A JUVENILE CASE WHICH OTHER ADVERSARIED EXPLOITED NOT ONLY IN ORANGE COUNTY IN 2011- THEY FOLLOWED (THIRD PARTIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE MINOR'S FATHER WHO WERE PARTICIPATING IN ABUSIVE LITIGATION AND SURVEILLANCE ANNOYANCES ASSOCIATED WITH GANG STALKING WHEN THE COMPLAINTS WERE MADE TO THE OFFICE OF CIVIL AFFAIRS, AMBER HIKES, & THE DC PATROL OFFICER IN PHILADELPHIA COUNTY) ME TO HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FL, TO CAMDEN COUNTY, NJ AND PHILADELPHIA COUNTY -

PROBLEM- MONITORING - ABUSIVE SURVEILLANCE WHICH WAS NOT APART OF ANY COURT JUDGEMENT ISSUED IN FEBRUARY OF 2011 OR AUGUST 30TH OF 2011. THIS PROBLEM CONTINUED AFTER AUGUST OF 2011 AND AFTER I MOVED OUT OF THE ORANGE COUNTY JURISDICTION TO PHILADELPHIA COUNTY- ABUSIVE LITIGATION.

Doris Mackey GAL Case Coordinator (Team Leader Division 7)

Re: FRAUD

(5617503201, FELICIA HANDLEY, ORANGE COUNTY, FL CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department

Federal laws Federal law 42 U.S.C. § 5772 & 42 U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5772) defines a "missing child" as "any individual less than 18 years of age whose whereabouts are unknown to such individual"s legal custodian)

RELATING TO "job -duty-task description -misconduct in fraud-aggravated white collar criminal torts- the very first page indicated the allegation which was never spoken in regards throughout the case a highly prejudicial allegations (in Felicia Handley's Order of Arraignment" statement- FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS WHEREAS DISCLOSURE OF THE FRAUD WOULD HAVE GRANTED A DISMISSAL -AGAIN AFTER THE JANUARY 28,2011 DISMISSAL BY JUDGE ANTHONY JOHNSON -prior to a request to change judge/based on background profiles to Donald E Grincewicz who also disregarded the fraudulent "missing child" statement but acted in Accord to case histories resulting in a change of parents custody- clearly a precedent case tactic in abating child support recovery of more than 100 months of abscent financial support of the child- ALSO EXPOSING FRIVILOUS LITIGATION AN ABUSIVE LITIGATION TACTIC TO EVADE CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT DISBURSEMENTS WHICH BEGAN AS THE RESULT OF THE DECEMBER 22,2010 JUDGEMENT ORDER AGAINST ONE OF THE CHILDREN'S DADS) with particular regards to abusive litigation tactics, gender violence and domestic violence. The GAL ad Litem "case coordinator" concealed information that I am sure she had available to her regarding "related cases- parties in the case where the same parties in concurrent family law cases in another ninth district division that held historical data relating to a pattern of judicial misconduct, paternity & child support proceedings filed in the Orange County Clerk of Courts-maintained in the Records Management Division, RISS database, FL Dept of Revenue Child Support records and foremost FL DCF RFA case histories on both children.

Barbara Tanner Jones & Tangel-Rodriguez & Associates 222 Weber St, Orlando, FL 32803 Bar Number: 391956 Mail Address: Tangel-Rodriguez & Assoc 222 Weber St Orlando, FL 32803-3831 United States Office: 407-849-1133 Cell: 407-849-1133

SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS MACKEY Heather Morcroft (Appellate Atty) 20 n Orange Ave Ste 700 Orlando 32801 FBN 0709859 407-325-3585 Attorney for Jarrid D. Williams Carlos Alberto Gonzalez Bar Number: 656755 Mail Address: Wayne Starr P.A. PO Box 560206 Orlando, FL 32856-0206 United States Office: 407-228-7280 Fax: 407-228-4296 Email: waynestarr@cfl.rr.com

Case# 482005DR014270A001OX) THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300 (KNOWLEDGE OF FRAUD AND INTENTIINAL OMISSIIN BY THE OTHER ATTYS - ". As an officer of the court, a lawyer cannot have his client perjure himself on the stand, that is, if that lawyer knows it is a lie. Otherwise, a lawyer would be perpetuating fraud upon the court. At that point, the lawyer is under an obligation to withdraw from the case (according to the rules of professional conduct). The lawyer is not required to divulge the reason for the withdrawal, in fact, it is improper to disclose such reasons due to attorney/client privilege but it would usually give the judge a good clue based on timing of the withdrawal. In short, a lawyer cannot stand by and watch the client lie to the court...."

Complaint (5617503201, FELICIA HANDLEY, ORANGE COUNTY, FL CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department

, that such a biasedness occurred it is described as unconscionably ethnically biased, a white collar criminal act by a party who misused his/her office to aid and assist avoidance of judicial action, that the action was in violation of the minor to case’s rights, that the action was in violation of parental rights to recovery of child support and paternity establishment in the Orange County, Ninth Judicial Circuit and Court, Division 42. Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:39 PM Subject: ATTORNEY GENERAL COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST Hershkowitz Russell S Attorney Category: Bankruptcy Law [Edit] 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte Springs, FL 32714

CONTINUING WHITE COLLAR CRIME AND MOCKERIES OF PRIVACY RIGHTS, ANNOYANCES TO BENEFIT THE EXINTIMATE PARTNERS.

Thursday, 6 August 2020

All counsel of record in any case have a continuing duty promptly to inform the Court and counsel of the existence of any other case within the purview of this rule, as well as the existence of any similar or related case or proceeding pending before any other court or administrative agency.

US Courts (.gov)

Rule 1.04 - Similar or Successive Cases; Duty of Counsel | Middle ...

Monday, 27 July 2020

Access Device Correspondence

"Access device" means any card, plate, code, account number, electronic serial number, mobile identification number, personal identification number, or other telecommunications service, equipment, or instrument identifier, or other means of account access that can be used, alone or in conjunction with another access device, to obtain money, goods, services, or any other thing of value

http://archive.flsenate.gov/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0800-0899/0817/Sections/0817.568.html

(f) “Personal identification information” means any name or number that may be used, alone or in conjunction with any other information, to identify a specific individual, including any:

1. Name, postal or electronic mail address, telephone number, social security number, date of birth, mother’s maiden name, official state-issued or United States-issued driver’s license or identification number, alien registration number, government passport number, employer or taxpayer identification number, Medicaid or food assistance account number, bank account number, credit or debit card number, or personal identification number or code assigned to the holder of a debit card by the issuer to permit authorized electronic use of such card;

2. Unique biometric data, such as fingerprint, voice print, retina or iris image, or other unique physical representation;

3. Unique electronic identification number, address, or routing code;

4. Medical records;

5. Telecommunication identifying information or access device; or

6. Other number or information that can be used to access a person’s financial resources.

Thursday, 9 April 2020

defined white collar crimes as crime as a crime committed by persons of respectability and high social status in the course of their occupation. 1 The main categories of white collar crimes are bribery and corruption, food and drug adulteration, counterfeiting, forgery, tax evasion, cyber-crimes etc

For a crime to occur there must be an act of either commission or omission by the accused. can't be convicted of a crime due to your status. Causation (human conduct must cause harm) For a crime to have been committed, there must be a casual relationship between and act and the harm suffered.

An instance showing the difference between an act of omission and the commission of an act is the difference in withholding the truth and voicing a lie. Both an act committed and an act of omission can change the result of a circumstance.

An act of omission and an act of commission are ethical issues of both a secular and religious nature. There is a difference in moral theology between formal cooperation and material cooperation both with and without consent. When a person either aids in an evil act or does nothing to prevent that act, it is cooperation with evil

(Negligence leads to liability. If someone causes an automobile accident leading to grievous injuries to another person and he is found driving, while being drunk, it is clear that it is a case of negligence as careless conduct of the driver led to a situation that caused mishap. If a doctor, in his hurry, does not apply stitches to a injured person properly, these stitches may give way causing a lot of trouble for the victim. The doctor can be held guilty on counts of negligence as his inability to perform his duty diligently caused suffering of patient)

What is Fraud on the Court? Fraud on the Court, or Fraud upon the Court, is where a material misrepresentation has been made to the court, or by the court itself. The main requirement is that the impartiality of the court has been so disrupted that it can’t perform its tasks without bias or prejudice. Some examples of fraud on the court include: Fraud in the service of court summons (such as withholding a court summons from a party) Corruption or influence of a court member or official Judicial fraud Intentionally failing to inform the parties of necessary appointments or requirements, in efforts to obstruct the judicial process “Unconscionable” schemes to deceive or make misrepresentations through the court system It’s important to note that fraud on the court only involves court officials or officers of the court, such as judges or court-appointed attorneys. The fraud must be directed at the “judicial machinery” itself. Fraud on the court generally does NOT mean: Fraud between the two opposing parties Submission of fraudulent documents Perjury or false statements by witnesses

For the official who acted in fraud upon the court, they may very well be required to step down from their position and may even be subjected to criminal consequences like a fine or a jail sentence. It could also result in other serious consequences, such as an attorney being disbarred, or a judge being removed from service.

If a court official is found to be biased or prejudiced even before fraud occurs, they are required to excuse themselves from the case, and a different official must be appointed. In some jurisidictions, a trial tainted by fraud on the court will be vacated or set aside for a certain time period (such as two years), to be “reopened” at a later date.

Saturday, 7 December 2019

..."Duty, breach, causation, and damages. Those are the elements of a negligence claim,..." https://definitions.uslegal.com/a/attorney-misconduct/

(https://legalmatch.typepad.com/personalinjury/)

Procedural Issues:

Ensuring that the claim is filed within the deadlines known as the statute of limitations
Selecting venue (the location where the case will be heard)
Filing the appropriate papers with the court
Responding to any court papers filed by the other party such as requests for documents

Strategic Matters:

Investigating the case through discovery (obtaining information from the other party)
Speaking for the client in court
Selecting a jury
Handling trial
Appealing your case
Recommending courses of action the client should take at all stages of the case
Regularly communicating with the client to provide updates

https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/lawyer-and-client-responsibilities.html

SECTION I
FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE
RULE 12.003. COORDINATION OF RELATED FAMILY CASES AND
HEARINGS
(a) Assignment to One Judge.
(1) All related family cases must be handled before one judge
unless impractical.
(2) If it is impractical for one judge to handle all related family
cases, the judges assigned to hear the related cases involving the same family

and/or children may confer for the purpose of case management and coordination
of the cases. Notice and communication shall comply with Canon 3.B.(7) of the
Code of Judicial Conduct. The party who filed the notice of related cases or the
court may coordinate a case management conference under rule 12.200 between
the parties and the judges hearing the related cases. In addition to the issues that
may be considered, the court shall:
(A) consolidate as many issues as is practical to be heard by
one judge;
(B) coordinate the progress of the remaining issues to
facilitate the resolution of the pending actions and to avoid inconsistent rulings;
(C) determine the attendance or participation of any minor
child in the proceedings if the related cases include a juvenile action; and
(D) determine the access of the parties to court records if a
related case is confidential pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration
2.420.
(b) Joint Hearings or Trials.
(1) The court may order joint hearings or trials of any issues in
related family cases.
(2) For joint or coordinated hearings, notice to all parties and to all
attorneys of record in each related case shall be provided by the court, the moving
party, or other party as ordered by the court, regardless of whether or not the party
providing notice is a party in every case number that will be called for hearing.
RULE 12.004. JUDICIAL ACCESS AND REVIEW OF RELATED
FAMILY FILES
(a) In General. A judge hearing a family case may access and review the
files of any related case either pending or closed, to aid in carrying out his or her
adjudicative responsibilities. Authorized court staff and personnel may also access

and review the file of any related case.

Rule 3.3: Candor Toward the Tribunal

https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_3_3_candor_toward_the_tribunal/

(a) A lawyer shall not knowingly:

(1) make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal or fail to correct a false statement of material fact or law previously made to the tribunal by the lawyer;

(2) fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel; or

(3) offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer, the lawyer’s client, or a witness called by the lawyer, has offered material evidence and the lawyer comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures, including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal. A lawyer may refuse to offer evidence, other than the testimony of a defendant in a criminal matter, that the lawyer reasonably believes is false.

(b) A lawyer who represents a client in an adjudicative proceeding and who knows that a person intends to engage, is engaging or has engaged in criminal or fraudulent conduct related to the proceeding shall take reasonable remedial measures, including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal.

(c) The duties stated in paragraphs (a) and (b) continue to the conclusion of the proceeding, and apply even if compliance requires disclosure of information otherwise protected by Rule 1.6.

(d) In an ex parte proceeding, a lawyer shall inform the tribunal of all material facts known to the lawyer that will enable the tribunal to make an informed decision, whether or not the facts are adverse.

Thursday, 7 November 2019

...a fair trial is one in which evidence subject to adversarial testing is presented to an impartial tribunal for resolution of issues defined in advance of the proceeding... Fraud on the court to initiate proceeding by false reporting a missing child. White Collar Crime- Aggravated White Collar Crime ...(c)Victimizes the State of Florida, any state agency, any of the state’s political subdivisions, or any agency of the state’s political subdivisions,and thereby obtains or attempts to obtain $50,000 or more, commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.)(aggravated white collar crime” means engaging in at least two white collar crimes that have the same or similar intents, results, accomplices, victims, or methods of commission, or that are otherwise interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated incidents, provided that at least one of such crimes occurred after the effective date of this act.) What is Fraud on the Court? Fraud on the Court, or Fraud upon the Court, is where a material misrepresentation has been made to the court, or by the court itself. The main requirement is that the impartiality of the court has been so disrupted that it can’t perform its tasks without bias or prejudice. Some examples of fraud on the court include: Fraud in the service of court summons (such as withholding a court summons from a party) Corruption or influence of a court member or official Judicial fraud Intentionally failing to inform the parties of necessary appointments or requirements, in efforts to obstruct the judicial process “Unconscionable” schemes to deceive or make misrepresentations through the court system It’s important to note that fraud on the court only involves court officials or officers of the court, such as judges or court-appointed attorneys. The fraud must be directed at the “judicial machinery” itself. Fraud on the court generally does NOT mean: Fraud between the two opposing parties Submission of fraudulent documents Perjury or false statements by witnessesFor the official who acted in fraud upon the court, they may very well be required to step down from their position and may even be subjected to criminal consequences like a fine or a jail sentence. It could also result in other serious consequences, such as an attorney being disbarred, or a judge being removed from service.If a court official is found to be biased or prejudiced even before fraud occurs, they are required to excuse themselves from the case, and a different official must be appointed. In some jurisidictions, a trial tainted by fraud on the court will be vacated or set aside for a certain time period (such as two years), to be “reopened” at a later date.

http://caught.net/caught/ineffec.htm

"Failed to challenge..."

http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0700-0799/0775/Sections/0775.0844.html

(4) As used in this section, “aggravated white collar crime” means engaging in at least two white collar crimes that have the same or similar intents, results, accomplices, victims, or methods of commission, or that are otherwise interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated incidents, provided that at least one of such crimes occurred after the effective date of this act.

(5) Any person who commits an aggravated white collar crime as defined in this section and in so doing either:

(a) Victimizes 10 or more elderly persons, as defined in s. 825.101;

(b) Victimizes 20 or more persons, as defined in s. 1.01; or

(c) Victimizes the State of Florida, any state agency, any of the state’s political subdivisions, or any agency of the state’s political subdivisions,

and thereby obtains or attempts to obtain $50,000 or more, commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

...Fraud victimization involving attorney conspiracy Fwd: Domestic Violence involving police misconduct whereas she stalked me to another state & residence continuing the violence reliving the the initial attacks& assaults by police monitoring related to fraudulent claims & intimate partner violence all over again in addition to prosecutorial tools ABUSIVE LITIGATION NUISANCES -misconduct Fwd: Fraud On The Court, intentional omissions from civil procedure (case coordination & consolidation or related cases as well as nondisclosure that the same parties were in family law cases scheduled six days apart from a prior hearing with another judge & several days apart from other hearing dates in another family law division that had historical data as well as published court calendar dates all immitted from proceedings as well as the initial claim or allegation omitted from Court testimony Fwd: Frauds, case narratives Complaint against Florida Bar# 667498 Claudia Hernandez ; Florida DCF...

Fraud

OMITTED INTENTIONALLY

FAILED TO DISCLOSE INTENTIONALLY

PREJUDICED THE JUDGE INTENTIONALLY

THE FOLLOWINGMATERIAL FACTS OF SUBSTANTIAL EFFECT -

VAWA REPORT REGARDING NOT ONLY ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT IN CHILD CUSTODY MODIFICATION

Intentionally omitted criminal nonsupport, offensive behaviour, professional misconduct and ethnic biasedness, child exploitation and institutional racism

Title 42 section 42 1983, 14141 attorney prosecutorial child chustody exploitation including false statements never heard throughout case trial activity, false statements to commence proceedings

Case Type:

Paternity

Date Filed:

4/24/2002

Location:

Div 38

UCN:

482002DR006249A001OX

Judge:

Patricia A Doherty

Status:

Closed - SRS

Date Description Pages Doc Request

Doc

7/10/2013 Letter 12

3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address 1

1/1/2007 Case Reassigned to Division

2/11/2005 Notice

11/10/2004 Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing

9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated

9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Smith, Maura T

9/24/2004 Court Minutes

9/24/2004 Affidavit

9/13/2004 Pluries Summons Unserved

7/28/2004 Pluries Summons Served

7/27/2004 Notice of Hearing

7/16/2004 Motion to Dismiss

7/14/2004 Notice of Unavailability

7/14/2004 Notice Appearance of Counsel

7/1/2004 Affidavit of Lost/Destroyed Instrument

7/1/2004 Pluries Summons Issued

4/16/2004 Pluries Summons Issued

1/6/2004 Returned Mail

12/26/2003 Certificate of Mailing

12/26/2003 Affidavit

12/26/2003 Notice of Action Issued

10/13/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved

9/12/2003 Pluries Summons Issued

9/3/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved

9/3/2003 Affidavit

9/3/2003 Motion

9/3/2003 Motion for Default

9/3/2003 Affidavit

9/3/2003 Motion

9/3/2003 Motion for Default

8/4/2003 Pluries Summons Issued

7/31/2003 Request for Admissions

6/9/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved

5/21/2003 Pluries Summons Issued

5/1/2003 Third Party Summons

2/11/2003 Pluries Summons Issued

12/26/2002 Pluries Summons Served

11/8/2002 Pluries Summons Issued

9/24/2002 Pluries Summons Unserved

8/30/2002 Pluries Summons Issued

7/29/2002 Summons Returned

7/3/2002 Alias Summons Issued

5/15/2002 Summons Returned

4/24/2002 Summons Issued

4/24/2002 Affidavit of Non Military Service

4/24/2002 Request for Admissions

4/24/2002 Affidavit of Need

4/24/2002 Certificate of Compliance

4/24/2002 Financial Affidavit

4/24/2002 Civil Cover Sheet

4/24/2002 Petition

4/24/2002 Initial Judge Assigned

Case Type:

Paternity DOR

Date Filed:

8/29/2005

Location:

Div 42

UCN:

482005DR014270A001OX

Judge:

Heather P Rodriguez

Status:

Re-Closed

Citation Number:

Date Description Pages Doc Request

Doc

3/3/2016 Returned Mail 3

2/11/2016 Order Denying 2

4/14/2015 Motion to Vacate 10

4/14/2015 Notice 3

7/3/2013 Letter 5

3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address 1

8/7/2012 Letter 11

5/15/2012 Order Denying 1

5/7/2012 Birth Certificate 1

5/7/2012 Motion 107

5/7/2012 Civil Cover Sheet 2

4/2/2012 Notice of Change of Address 1

4/2/2012 Motion 74

12/5/2011 Letter 3

11/14/2011 Notice of Change of Address 1

9/19/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & Order 2

9/14/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9

9/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9

4/6/2011 Returned Mail 2

3/30/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & Order 3

3/28/2011 Child Support Information Sheet 1

3/28/2011 Certified Notice of Delinquent Support 1

3/28/2011 Notice to Depository 1

3/28/2011 Supplemental Financial Statement 1

3/28/2011 Court Minutes 1

3/28/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George

3/22/2011 Returned Mail 2

3/11/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment 1

2/24/2011 Notice of Change of Address 1

2/24/2011 Memorandum 7

2/24/2011 Copy/Copies 6

2/23/2011 Answer 6

2/18/2011 Alias Summons Returned Served 5

2/17/2011 Final Order 1

2/14/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George

1/14/2011 Returned Mail 2

1/4/2011 Notice of Hearing 1

1/4/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment 1

11/29/2010 Notice of Change of Address 1

10/22/2010 Order for Income Deduction 1

10/22/2010 Report/Recommendation and Final Judgment 4

10/19/2010 Court Minutes 1

10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) 2

10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet 2

10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet 1

10/19/2010 HEARING - Petition/Motion

10/8/2010 Returned Mail 2

9/20/2010 Order for Non Jury Trial 1

9/17/2010 Notice for Trial 1

8/12/2010 Response 2

6/14/2010 Alias Summons Issued 4

4/9/2010 Summons Returned Unserved 5

12/17/2009 Summons Issued 4

12/17/2009 Certificate of Compliance 2

12/17/2009 Financial Affidavit 4

12/17/2009 Petition 4

12/17/2009 Request for Admissions 1

11/1/2006 Notice of Change of Address

9/28/2006 HRS673 to Bureau

7/19/2006 Letter

5/9/2006 Final Judgment

5/9/2006 Order for Income Deduction

5/9/2006 Disposed by Non-Jury Trial

5/9/2006 Final Judgment

5/8/2006 HRS673 to Bureau

4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated

4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A

4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated

4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A

4/28/2006 Affidavit

4/28/2006 Court Minutes

3/29/2006 Order for Non Jury Trial

3/29/2006 Notice of Hearing

3/29/2006 Notice for Trial

3/29/2006 Request to Produce

3/28/2006 Request for Admissions

3/28/2006 Notice of Filing HLA Tissue Typing

2/9/2006 Notice

1/10/2006 HRS673 to Bureau

1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A

1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated

1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A

1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated

1/5/2006 Court Minutes

1/5/2006 Financial Affidavit

1/5/2006 Child Support Information Sheet

12/6/2005 Notice of Hearing

12/6/2005 Order for Non Jury Trial

12/6/2005 Request to Produce

12/6/2005 Notice for Trial

12/5/2005 Answer

10/31/2005 Summons Returned

10/27/2005 Answer Denying Allegations

8/29/2005 Summons Issued

8/29/2005 Request for Admissions

8/29/2005 Certificate of Compliance

8/29/2005 Financial Affidavit

8/29/2005 Notice of Social Security

8/29/2005 Civil Cover Sheet

8/29/2005 Petition

8/29/2005 Initial Judge Assigned

Date Hearing Time Location Pages Doc

3/28/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 AM

2/14/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 AM

10/19/2010 Petition/Motion 1:00 PM

4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM

4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 8:00 AM

4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM

4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 8:00 AM

1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 9:00 AM

1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM

1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 9:00 AM

1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM

Knowledge of the fraud prior to continuance of the proceedings- which was not the case in the following proceedings nor thereafter when I contacted my attorney regarding ineffective counsel.

cc:

Knowledge of the fraud prior to continuance of the proceedings- which was not the case in the following proceedings nor thereafter when I contacted my attorney regarding ineffective counsel.

Monday, 28 October 2019

Intentional divestation from ethical standards,the Creed of professional ism & perpetuated institution violence, white collar crime

RE: 9457320158 RFA CASE# 1143172973 False Report FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS AFTER AN EARLIER DISMISSED ALLEGATION IN THE FL NINTH DISTRICT JUVENILE COURTS -6 DAYS PRIOR- THE SAME FL DCF CPI'S MISUSE OF OFFICE TO HARASS ME OUT ON THE ORLANDO, FL STREET WITH A SCENE AT A NEIGHBORHOOD GROCER - COPS & OVER INFLATED BEHAVIOUR BY THE ACCOMPANYING CPI WHO GOT OUT THEIR GOVERNMENT VEHICLE YELLING "ITS OVER!, ITS OVER!" LOUD ENOUGH FOR THE SMALL NEIGHBORHOOD BLOCK & COMMUNITY TO FORM SOME TYPE OF OPINION THAT A CRIMINAL ACT OR CHARGE WAS INVOLVED - ESCORTED BY THE POLICE WITH NO COURT PAPER WORK - THEY DETAINED OR TEMPORARILY PLACED THE TWO CHILDREN OVERNIGHT WITH THEIR DADS, (WHO SHE HAD ALREADY CALLED OUT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD BEFORE THE STOP) PRACTICALLY STRANGERS WHO WERE CALLED AS THE OTHER BIOLOGICAL PARENT RATHER THAN THE EXISTENCE OF A PREEXISTING RELATIONSHIP FOR MY KID TO STAY IN A STRANGER'S HOME UNTIL HER FALSE ALLEGATION WAS DISMISSED THE NEXT MORNING. ALL TAKING PLACE WITHIN TWO DAYS OF MY DAUGHTER'S BIRTHDAY "HOLIDAY" ON 1/29/2011. FL CLASSIFIES CRIMES COMMITTED AROUND HOLIDAYS AS HATE CRIMES! OUTRIGHT MOCKERIES THE DAD IS THE ONE WITH NUMEROUS CRIMINAL CHARGES

Dismissed by Judge Anthony H. Johnson

01/27/2011, 6 Days earlier was a fraudulent claim.

Then Handley goes back into her "venue" & lies & reports that there are two missing children on February 3, 2011 in RETALIATION AFTER THEIR INITIAL LOSS.

BUT YOU DIDN'T TELL JUDGE DONALD GRINCEWITZ THAT. NOR DID YOU EVEN MENTION ANYTHING ABOUT A "MISSING CHILD" THAT COULD BE USED IN AN APPEAL ACCORDING TO THE FLORIDA CI lawyer should not knowingly misstate, distort, or improperly exaggerate any fact or opinion nor permit the lawyer’s silence or inaction to mislead anyone. What is Fraud on the Court? Fraud on the Court, or Fraud upon the Court, is where a material misrepresentation has been made to the court, or by the court itself. The main requirement is that the impartiality of the court has been so disrupted that it can’t perform its tasks without bias or prejudice. Some examples of fraud on the court include: Fraud in the service of court summons (such as withholding a court summons from a party) Corruption or influence of a court member or official Judicial fraud Intentionally failing to inform the parties of necessary appointments or requirements, in efforts to obstruct the judicial process “Unconscionable” schemes to deceive or make misrepresentations through the court system It’s important to note that fraud on the court only involves court officials or officers of the court, such as judges or court-appointed attorneys. The fraud must be directed at the “judicial machinery” itself. Fraud on the court generally does NOT mean: Fraud between the two opposing parties Submission of fraudulent documents Perjury or false statements by witnesses

391956 Mail Address: Tangel-Rodriguez & Assoc 222 Weber St Orlando, FL 32803-3831 United States Office: 407-849-1133 Cell: 407-849-1133

...What is Fraud on the Court? Fraud on the Court, or Fraud upon the Court, is where a material misrepresentation has been made to the court, or by the court itself. The main requirement is that the impartiality of the court has been so disrupted that it can’t perform its tasks without bias or prejudice. Some examples of fraud on the court include: Fraud in the service of court summons (such as withholding a court summons from a party) Corruption or influence of a court member or official Judicial fraud Intentionally failing to inform the parties of necessary appointments or requirements, in efforts to obstruct the judicial process “Unconscionable” schemes to deceive or make misrepresentations through the court system It’s important to note that fraud on the court only involves court officials or officers of the court, such as judges or court-appointed attorneys. The fraud must be directed at the “judicial machinery” itself. Fraud on the court generally does NOT mean: Fraud between the two opposing parties Submission of fraudulent documents Perjury or false statements by witnesses