http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/?m=1

I evenchecked David Ickessite regarding cult based or faith based scams,stalkers, cult harassment involved in the bullying and family violence, faithbased violence, perpetuated violence to the "peeking" manifestation these guys wanted to gain access to private life, untimate relationships, etc as a means to abuse and break off relationships with instigation and lies.
This harassment evolved into "improper purpuse", "malicious prosecution", and as you can see in the blog
Professional misconduct. Intentional allegations used to isolate me in the community and cause background check, hearsay problems. Lies about kidnapping my kids to get abusive child custody orders. So today I filed with the US Postal Inspection Service and I am filing the suggested mail fraud complaint.      

ETHNIC BIASEDNESS HATE CRIME ATTACK http://goo.gl/h9wjQr, http://cashmoneylife.com/mba-options-part-6-return-on-investment/

ETHNIC BIASEDNESS HATE CRIME ATTACK 

http://goo.gl/h9wjQr,

 http://cashmoneylife.com/mba-options-part-6-return-on-investment/

FRAUD is generally defined in the law as an intentional misrepresentation of material existing fact made by one person to another with knowledge of its falsity and for the purpose of inducing the other person to act, and upon which the other person relies with resulting injury or damage. Fraud may also by made by an omission or purposeful failure to state material facts, which nondisclosure makes other statements misleading.

To constitute fraud, a misrepresentation or omission must also relate to an existing fact’, not a promise to do something in the future, unless the person who made the promise did so without any present intent to perform it or with a positive intent not to perform it. Promises to do something in the future or a mere expression of opinion cannot be the basis of a claim of fraud unless the person stating the opinion has exclusive or superior knowledge of existing facts which are inconsistent with such opinion. The false statement or omission must be material, meaning that it was significant to the decision to be made. Sometimes, it must be shown that the plaintiff’s reliance was justifiable, and that upon reasonable inquiry would not have discovered the truth of the matter. For injury or damage to be the result of fraud, it must be shown that, except for the fraud, the injury or damage would not have occurred.

- See more at: http://torts.uslegal.com/intentional-torts/fraud/#sthash.IJSFSCcc.dpuf

The FFCA authorizes private individuals to bring “qui tam” suits in the name of the state against persons or entities who have defrauded the state in contracting or other matters.

Florida Updates Qui Tam Whistleblower Statute

The FFCA authorizes private individuals to bring “qui tam” suits in the name of the state against persons or entities who have defrauded the state in contracting or other matters.2 As an incentive to bring these suits, the FFCA allows successful plaintiffs, sometimes called whistleblowers or relators, to share in the damages recovered.

REGARDING COMPLAINT § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat.

Civil contempt is conduct directed against the rights of the opposing party.

law-imposed obligation ;"an act or omission tending to obstruct or
interfere with the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the
dignity of the court or respect for its authority. There are two
kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct contempt
openly and in the presence of the court, resists the power of the
court, 102 A. 400, 406; and consequential, or constructive contempt
results from matters outside the court, such as failure to comply with
orders.

The basic standards governing fraud on the court are reasonably straightforward. As set forth in Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998):

The requisite fraud on the court occurs where “it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.” Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989) . . . . The trial court has the inherent authority, within the exercise of sound judicial discretion, to dismiss an action when a plaintiff has perpetrated a fraud on the court, or where 



a party refuses to comply with court orders. Kornblum v. Schneider, 609 So. 2d 138, 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

Shayan Elahi Esq 741221 Heather Morcroft 709859Wayne Starr Anthony Sos Guardia Ad Litem Claudia Hernandez 667498 Amanda Etzkorn 25942 Cedric Tibon 21311

ACAP THE FLORIDA BAR INQUIRY COMPLAINT FORM http://goo.gl/h9wjQr

THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (ACAP)

http://goo.gl/h9wjQr
COMPLAINT REGARDING FRAUD ON THE COURT
AGGRAVATED WHITE COLLAR CRIMINAL ACTIVITY
775.0844 1st Aggravated white collar crime

THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (ACAP)
http://goo.gl/h9wjQr 775.0844 1st Aggravated white collar crime

report to the white collar crimes center was sent via email to contact@nw3c.org"

http://goo.gl/h9wjQr 775.0844 1st Aggravated white collar crime

PARTY TO THE COMPLAINT:

AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S)

FLORIDA BAR MEMBER(S):

SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221

WAYNE STARR

ANTHONY SOS

GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498

AMANDA ETZKORN 25942

CEDRIC TIBON

DORIS MACKEY

Heather Morcroft (Appellate Atty)

20 n Orange Ave

Ste 700 Orlando 32801

FBN 0709859

;"an act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere with the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the dignity of the court or respect for its authority. There are two kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct contempt openly and in the presence of the court, resists the power of the court, 102 A. 400, 406; and consequential, or constructive contempt results from matters outside the court, such as failure to comply with

orders

REGISTER OF ACTIONS CASE NO. 1993-CF-008458-A-O

STATE OF FLORIDA VS. WILLIAMS, JARRID D § § § § § § §

Case Type: Criminal Felony Date Filed: 08/10/1993 Location: Div 12 Judicial Officer: Murphy, Mike Uniform Case Number: 481993CF008458000AOX

PARTY INFORMATION Lead Attorneys Defendant WILLIAMS, JARRID D DOB: 08/20/1970 OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDER, ESQUIRE Retained 407-836-4800(W)

Plaintiff STATE OF FLORIDA CHARGE INFORMATION Charges: WILLIAMS, JARRID D Statute Level Date 1. CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE OFFENSE 893.13(1)(A)(1) Second Degree - Felony 08/09/1993 2. CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE OFFENSE 893.13(1)(F) Third Degree - Felony 08/09/1993 EVENTS & ORDERS OF THE COURT DISPOSITIONS 12/05/1995 Adult Type - Criminal Non Citation (Judici

POSITIONS 12/05/1995 Adult Type - Criminal Non Citation (Judicial Officer: McDonald, Roger J) 1. CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE OFFENSE 08/09/1993 (SDF) 893.13(1)(A)(1) (893.13(1)(A)(1))

Confinement (Effective 12/05/1995 at 12:00 AM, Min. , Max. 0 Yr 11 Mo 27 Days , Orange County Jail, Comment: ) Credit for Time Served: 0 Yr 5 Mo 9 Days Suspended for: Yr Mo Days Drug Trafficking: Yr Mo Days Jurisdiction Retained: Yr Mo Days

11/02/1993 Disposition (Judicial Officer: McDonald, Roger J) 1. CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE OFFENSE 1 - Adjudicated Guilty

11/02/1993 Plea (Judicial Officer: McDonald, Roger J) 1. CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE OFFENSE Nolo Contendere

OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS 12/05/1995 Court Minutes COURT MINUTES FILED /ORD 12/05/1995 Plea PLEA FILED 12/05/1995 Sent: SENT: PROB REVOKED OCJ 51 WKS W/C 159 DYS T/S 12/05/1995 Plea of Guilty Entered PLEA OF GUILTY ENTERED TO VOP 12/05/1995 Adjudicated Guilty ADJUDICATED GUILTY PREV 12/05/1995 Plea of Not Guilty Withdrawn PLEA OF NOT GUILTY WITHDRAWN 12/05/1995 Appearance of Defendant Entered APPEARANCE OF DEFENDANT ENTERED 12/05/1995 In Open Court IN OPEN COURT VOP HEARING 11/07/1995 Subpoena Issued SUBPOENA ISSUED* RET: 12/05/95 1

.

407-325-3585

The ACAP telephone number is toll-free, (866) 352-0707.

775.0844 1st Aggravated white collar crime. STATE OF FLORIDA OFFENSE CODE LISTING

§ 112.313(8), Fla. Stat.

Civil contempt is conduct directed against the rights of the opposing party.

law-imposed obligation ;"an act or omission tending to obstruct or
interfere with the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the
dignity of the court or respect for its authority. There are two
kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct contempt
openly and in the presence of the court, resists the power of the
court, 102 A. 400, 406; and consequential, or constructive contempt
results from matters outside the court, such as failure to comply with
orders.

The basic standards governing fraud on the court are reasonably straightforward. As set forth in Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998):

The requisite fraud on the court occurs where “it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.” Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989) . . . . The trial court has the inherent authority, within the exercise of sound judicial discretion, to dismiss an action when a plaintiff has perpetrated a fraud on the court, or where 



a party refuses to comply with court orders. Kornblum v. Schneider, 609 So. 2d 138, 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

Shayan Elahi Esq 741221 Heather Morcroft 709859Wayne Starr Anthony Sos Guardia Ad Litem Claudia Hernandez 667498 Amanda Etzkorn 25942 Cedric Tibon 21311

HTTPS://WWW.LAW.CORNELL.EDU/ETHICS/FL/CODE/FL_CODE.HTM#RULE_4-1.6

RULE 4-3.3 CANDOR TOWARD THE TRIBUNAL

(a) False Evidence; Duty to Disclose.

A lawyer shall not knowingly:

(1) make a false statement of material fact or law to a tribunal;

(2) fail to disclose a material fact to a tribunal when disclosure is necessary to avoid assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by the client;

(3) fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel; or

(4) permit any witness, including a criminal defendant, to offer testimony or other evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. A lawyer may not offer testimony that the lawyer knows to be false in the form of a narrative unless so ordered by the tribunal. If a lawyer has offered material evidence and thereafter comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures.

(b) Extent of Lawyer's Duties.

The duties stated in subdivision (a) continue beyond the conclusion of the proceeding and apply even if compliance requires disclosure of information otherwise protected by rule 4-1.6.

(c) Evidence Believed to Be False.

A lawyer may refuse to offer evidence that the lawyer reasonably believes is false.

(d) Ex Parte Proceedings.

In an ex parte proceeding a lawyer shall inform the tribunal of all material facts known to the lawyer that will enable the tribunal to make an informed decision, whether or not the facts are adverse.

[Comment][Narrative].

§ 112.313(8), Fla. Stat.

Civil contempt is conduct directed against the rights of the opposing party.

law-imposed obligation ;"an act or omission tending to obstruct or
interfere with the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the
dignity of the court or respect for its authority. There are two
kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct contempt
openly and in the presence of the court, resists the power of the
court, 102 A. 400, 406; and consequential, or constructive contempt
results from matters outside the court, such as failure to comply with
orders.

The basic standards governing fraud on the court are reasonably straightforward. As set forth in Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998):

The requisite fraud on the court occurs where “it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.” Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989) . . . . The trial court has the inherent authority, within the exercise of sound judicial discretion, to dismiss an action when a plaintiff has perpetrated a fraud on the court, or where 



a party refuses to comply with court orders. Kornblum v. Schneider, 609 So. 2d 138, 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

Shayan Elahi Esq 741221 Heather Morcroft 709859Wayne Starr Anthony Sos Guardia Ad Litem Claudia Hernandez 667498 Amanda Etzkorn 25942 Cedric Tibon 21311