Monday, 27 July 2020

Access Device Correspondence

"Access device" means any card, plate, code, account number, electronic serial number, mobile identification number, personal identification number, or other telecommunications service, equipment, or instrument identifier, or other means of account access that can be used, alone or in conjunction with another access device, to obtain money, goods, services, or any other thing of value




(f) “Personal identification information” means any name or number that may be used, alone or in conjunction with any other information, to identify a specific individual, including any:
1. Name, postal or electronic mail address, telephone number, social security number, date of birth, mother’s maiden name, official state-issued or United States-issued driver’s license or identification number, alien registration number, government passport number, employer or taxpayer identification number, Medicaid or food assistance account number, bank account number, credit or debit card number, or personal identification number or code assigned to the holder of a debit card by the issuer to permit authorized electronic use of such card;
2. Unique biometric data, such as fingerprint, voice print, retina or iris image, or other unique physical representation;
3. Unique electronic identification number, address, or routing code;
4. Medical records;
5. Telecommunication identifying information or access device; or
6. Other number or information that can be used to access a person’s financial resources.

Thursday, 9 April 2020

defined white collar crimes as crime as a crime committed by persons of respectability and high social status in the course of their occupation. 1 The main categories of white collar crimes are bribery and corruption, food and drug adulteration, counterfeiting, forgery, tax evasion, cyber-crimes etc

For a crime to occur there must be an act of either commission or omission by the accused. can't be convicted of a crime due to your status. Causation (human conduct must cause harm) For a crime to have been committed, there must be a casual relationship between and act and the harm suffered.




An instance showing the difference between an act of omission and the commission of an act is the difference in withholding the truth and voicing a lie. Both an act committed and an act of omission can change the result of a circumstance.
An act of omission and an act of commission are ethical issues of both a secular and religious nature. There is a difference in moral theology between formal cooperation and material cooperation both with and without consent. When a person either aids in an evil act or does nothing to prevent that act, it is cooperation with evil


(Negligence leads to liability. If someone causes an automobile accident leading to grievous injuries to another person and he is found driving, while being drunk, it is clear that it is a case of negligence as careless conduct of the driver led to a situation that caused mishap. If a doctor, in his hurry, does not apply stitches to a injured person properly, these stitches may give way causing a lot of trouble for the victim. The doctor can be held guilty on counts of negligence as his inability to perform his duty diligently caused suffering of patient)





What is Fraud on the Court? Fraud on the Court, or Fraud upon the Court, is where a material misrepresentation has been made to the court, or by the court itself. The main requirement is that the impartiality of the court has been so disrupted that it can’t perform its tasks without bias or prejudice. Some examples of fraud on the court include: Fraud in the service of court summons (such as withholding a court summons from a party) Corruption or influence of a court member or official Judicial fraud Intentionally failing to inform the parties of necessary appointments or requirements, in efforts to obstruct the judicial process “Unconscionable” schemes to deceive or make misrepresentations through the court system It’s important to note that fraud on the court only involves court officials or officers of the court, such as judges or court-appointed attorneys. The fraud must be directed at the “judicial machinery” itself. Fraud on the court generally does NOT mean: Fraud between the two opposing parties Submission of fraudulent documents Perjury or false statements by witnesses
For the official who acted in fraud upon the court, they may very well be required to step down from their position and may even be subjected to criminal consequences like a fine or a jail sentence. It could also result in other serious consequences, such as an attorney being disbarred, or a judge being removed from service.

If a court official is found to be biased or prejudiced even before fraud occurs, they are required to excuse themselves from the case, and a different official must be appointed. In some jurisidictions, a trial tainted by fraud on the court will be vacated or set aside for a certain time period (such as two years), to be “reopened” at a later date.


What is Fraud on the Court? Fraud on the Court, or Fraud upon the Court, is where a material misrepresentation has been made to the court, or by the court itself. The main requirement is that the impartiality of the court has been so disrupted that it can’t perform its tasks without bias or prejudice. Some examples of fraud on the court include: Fraud in the service of court summons (such as withholding a court summons from a party) Corruption or influence of a court member or official Judicial fraud Intentionally failing to inform the parties of necessary appointments or requirements, in efforts to obstruct the judicial process “Unconscionable” schemes to deceive or make misrepresentations through the court system It’s important to note that fraud on the court only involves court officials or officers of the court, such as judges or court-appointed attorneys. The fraud must be directed at the “judicial machinery” itself. Fraud on the court generally does NOT mean: Fraud between the two opposing parties Submission of fraudulent documents Perjury or false statements by witnesses
For the official who acted in fraud upon the court, they may very well be required to step down from their position and may even be subjected to criminal consequences like a fine or a jail sentence. It could also result in other serious consequences, such as an attorney being disbarred, or a judge being removed from service.
If a court official is found to be biased or prejudiced even before fraud occurs, they are required to excuse themselves from the case, and a different official must be appointed. In some jurisidictions, a trial tainted by fraud on the court will be vacated or set aside for a certain time period (such as two years), to be “reopened” at a later date. 

Saturday, 7 December 2019

..."Duty, breach, causation, and damages. Those are the elements of a negligence claim,..." https://definitions.uslegal.com/a/attorney-misconduct/


(https://legalmatch.typepad.com/personalinjury/)




Procedural Issues:
  • Ensuring that the claim is filed within the deadlines known as the statute of limitations
  • Selecting venue (the location where the case will be heard)
  • Filing the appropriate papers with the court
  • Responding to any court papers filed by the other party such as requests for documents
Strategic Matters:
  • Investigating the case through discovery (obtaining information from the other party)
  • Speaking for the client in court
  • Selecting a jury
  • Handling trial
  • Appealing your case
  • Recommending courses of action the client should take at all stages of the case
  • Regularly communicating with the client to provide updates

https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/lawyer-and-client-responsibilities.html



SECTION I
FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE
RULE 12.003. COORDINATION OF RELATED FAMILY CASES AND 
HEARINGS
(a) Assignment to One Judge.
(1) All related family cases must be handled before one judge 
unless impractical.
(2) If it is impractical for one judge to handle all related family 
cases, the judges assigned to hear the related cases involving the same family 

and/or children may confer for the purpose of case management and coordination
of the cases. Notice and communication shall comply with Canon 3.B.(7) of the 
Code of Judicial Conduct. The party who filed the notice of related cases or the 
court may coordinate a case management conference under rule 12.200 between 
the parties and the judges hearing the related cases. In addition to the issues that 
may be considered, the court shall: 
(A) consolidate as many issues as is practical to be heard by 
one judge; 
(B) coordinate the progress of the remaining issues to 
facilitate the resolution of the pending actions and to avoid inconsistent rulings; 
(C) determine the attendance or participation of any minor 
child in the proceedings if the related cases include a juvenile action; and 
(D) determine the access of the parties to court records if a 
related case is confidential pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 
2.420. 
(b) Joint Hearings or Trials.
(1) The court may order joint hearings or trials of any issues in 
related family cases. 
(2) For joint or coordinated hearings, notice to all parties and to all 
attorneys of record in each related case shall be provided by the court, the moving 
party, or other party as ordered by the court, regardless of whether or not the party 
providing notice is a party in every case number that will be called for hearing.
RULE 12.004. JUDICIAL ACCESS AND REVIEW OF RELATED 
FAMILY FILES
(a) In General. A judge hearing a family case may access and review the 
files of any related case either pending or closed, to aid in carrying out his or her 
adjudicative responsibilities. Authorized court staff and personnel may also access 

and review the file of any related case.




Rule 3.3: Candor Toward the Tribunal

https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/rule_3_3_candor_toward_the_tribunal/


(a) A lawyer shall not knowingly:
(1) make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal or fail to correct a false statement of material fact or law previously made to the tribunal by the lawyer;
(2) fail to disclose to the tribunal legal authority in the controlling jurisdiction known to the lawyer to be directly adverse to the position of the client and not disclosed by opposing counsel; or
(3) offer evidence that the lawyer knows to be false. If a lawyer, the lawyer’s client, or a witness called by the lawyer, has offered material evidence and the lawyer comes to know of its falsity, the lawyer shall take reasonable remedial measures, including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal. A lawyer may refuse to offer evidence, other than the testimony of a defendant in a criminal matter, that the lawyer reasonably believes is false.
(b) A lawyer who represents a client in an adjudicative proceeding and who knows that a person intends to engage, is engaging or has engaged in criminal or fraudulent conduct related to the proceeding shall take reasonable remedial measures, including, if necessary, disclosure to the tribunal.
(c) The duties stated in paragraphs (a) and (b) continue to the conclusion of the proceeding, and apply even if compliance requires disclosure of information otherwise protected by Rule 1.6.

(d) In an ex parte proceeding, a lawyer shall inform the tribunal of all material facts known to the lawyer that will enable the tribunal to make an informed decision, whether or not the facts are adverse.

Thursday, 7 November 2019

...a fair trial is one in which evidence subject to adversarial testing is presented to an impartial tribunal for resolution of issues defined in advance of the proceeding... Fraud on the court to initiate proceeding by false reporting a missing child. White Collar Crime- Aggravated White Collar Crime ...(c)Victimizes the State of Florida, any state agency, any of the state’s political subdivisions, or any agency of the state’s political subdivisions,and thereby obtains or attempts to obtain $50,000 or more, commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.)(aggravated white collar crime” means engaging in at least two white collar crimes that have the same or similar intents, results, accomplices, victims, or methods of commission, or that are otherwise interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated incidents, provided that at least one of such crimes occurred after the effective date of this act.) What is Fraud on the Court? Fraud on the Court, or Fraud upon the Court, is where a material misrepresentation has been made to the court, or by the court itself. The main requirement is that the impartiality of the court has been so disrupted that it can’t perform its tasks without bias or prejudice. Some examples of fraud on the court include: Fraud in the service of court summons (such as withholding a court summons from a party) Corruption or influence of a court member or official Judicial fraud Intentionally failing to inform the parties of necessary appointments or requirements, in efforts to obstruct the judicial process “Unconscionable” schemes to deceive or make misrepresentations through the court system It’s important to note that fraud on the court only involves court officials or officers of the court, such as judges or court-appointed attorneys. The fraud must be directed at the “judicial machinery” itself. Fraud on the court generally does NOT mean: Fraud between the two opposing parties Submission of fraudulent documents Perjury or false statements by witnessesFor the official who acted in fraud upon the court, they may very well be required to step down from their position and may even be subjected to criminal consequences like a fine or a jail sentence. It could also result in other serious consequences, such as an attorney being disbarred, or a judge being removed from service.If a court official is found to be biased or prejudiced even before fraud occurs, they are required to excuse themselves from the case, and a different official must be appointed. In some jurisidictions, a trial tainted by fraud on the court will be vacated or set aside for a certain time period (such as two years), to be “reopened” at a later date.

http://caught.net/caught/ineffec.htm

 "Failed to challenge..."



http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0700-0799/0775/Sections/0775.0844.html
(4) As used in this section, “aggravated white collar crime” means engaging in at least two white collar crimes that have the same or similar intents, results, accomplices, victims, or methods of commission, or that are otherwise interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated incidents, provided that at least one of such crimes occurred after the effective date of this act.
(5) Any person who commits an aggravated white collar crime as defined in this section and in so doing either:
(a) Victimizes 10 or more elderly persons, as defined in s. 825.101;
(b) Victimizes 20 or more persons, as defined in s. 1.01; or
(c) Victimizes the State of Florida, any state agency, any of the state’s political subdivisions, or any agency of the state’s political subdivisions,
and thereby obtains or attempts to obtain $50,000 or more, commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.   
...Fraud victimization involving attorney conspiracy Fwd: Domestic Violence involving police misconduct whereas she stalked me to another state & residence continuing the violence reliving the the initial attacks& assaults by police monitoring related to fraudulent claims & intimate partner violence all over again in addition to prosecutorial tools ABUSIVE LITIGATION NUISANCES -misconduct Fwd: Fraud On The Court, intentional omissions from civil procedure (case coordination & consolidation or related cases as well as nondisclosure that the same parties were in family law cases scheduled six days apart from a prior hearing with another judge & several days apart from other hearing dates in another family law division that had historical data as well as published court calendar dates all immitted from proceedings as well as the initial claim or allegation omitted from Court testimony  Fwd: Frauds, case narratives Complaint against Florida Bar# 667498 Claudia Hernandez ; Florida DCF...



Fraud
Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141: makes it unlawful for state or local law enforcement agencies to allow officers to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives persons of rights protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. This law is commonly referred to as the Police Misconduct Statute.




OMITTED INTENTIONALLY 


FAILED TO DISCLOSE INTENTIONALLY

PREJUDICED THE JUDGE INTENTIONALLY


THE FOLLOWINGMATERIAL FACTS OF SUBSTANTIAL EFFECT - 

VAWA REPORT REGARDING NOT ONLY ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT IN CHILD CUSTODY MODIFICATION
Intentionally omitted criminal nonsupport, offensive behaviour, professional misconduct and ethnic biasedness, child exploitation and institutional racism
Title 42 section 42 1983, 14141 attorney prosecutorial child chustody exploitation including false statements never heard throughout case trial activity, false statements to commence proceedings 

Case Type:
Paternity
Date Filed:
4/24/2002
Location:
Div 38
UCN:
482002DR006249A001OX
Judge:
Patricia A Doherty
Status:
Closed - SRS
Date  Description  Pages  Doc  Request
Doc
7/10/2013  Letter  12   
3/19/2013  Notice of Change of Address  1   
1/1/2007  Case Reassigned to Division    
2/11/2005  Notice    
11/10/2004  Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing    
11/10/2004  Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing    
9/24/2004  HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated    
9/24/2004  HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated    
9/24/2004  HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated    
9/24/2004  HEARING - Status Hearing - Smith, Maura T    
9/24/2004  Court Minutes    
9/24/2004  Affidavit    
9/13/2004  Pluries Summons Unserved    
7/28/2004  Pluries Summons Served    
7/27/2004  Notice of Hearing    
7/16/2004  Motion to Dismiss    
7/14/2004  Notice of Unavailability    
7/14/2004  Notice Appearance of Counsel    
7/1/2004  Affidavit of Lost/Destroyed Instrument    
7/1/2004  Pluries Summons Issued    
4/16/2004  Pluries Summons Issued    
1/6/2004  Returned Mail    
12/26/2003  Certificate of Mailing    
12/26/2003  Affidavit    
12/26/2003  Notice of Action Issued    
10/13/2003  Pluries Summons Unserved    
9/12/2003  Pluries Summons Issued    
9/3/2003  Pluries Summons Unserved    
9/3/2003  Affidavit    
9/3/2003  Motion    
9/3/2003  Motion for Default    
9/3/2003  Affidavit    
9/3/2003  Motion    
9/3/2003  Motion for Default    
8/4/2003  Pluries Summons Issued    
7/31/2003  Request for Admissions    
6/9/2003  Pluries Summons Unserved    
5/21/2003  Pluries Summons Issued    
5/1/2003  Third Party Summons    
2/11/2003  Pluries Summons Issued    
12/26/2002  Pluries Summons Served    
11/8/2002  Pluries Summons Issued    
9/24/2002  Pluries Summons Unserved    
8/30/2002  Pluries Summons Issued    
7/29/2002  Summons Returned    
7/3/2002  Alias Summons Issued    
5/15/2002  Summons Returned    
4/24/2002  Summons Issued    
4/24/2002  Affidavit of Non Military Service    
4/24/2002  Request for Admissions    
4/24/2002  Affidavit of Need    
4/24/2002  Certificate of Compliance    
4/24/2002  Financial Affidavit    
4/24/2002  Civil Cover Sheet    
4/24/2002  Petition    
4/24/2002  Initial Judge Assigned

Case Type:
Paternity DOR
Date Filed:
8/29/2005
Location:
Div 42
UCN:
482005DR014270A001OX
Judge:
Heather P Rodriguez
Status:
Re-Closed
Citation Number:
Date  Description  Pages  Doc  Request
Doc
3/3/2016  Returned Mail  3   
2/11/2016  Order Denying  2   
2/11/2016  Order Denying  2   
4/14/2015  Motion to Vacate  10   
4/14/2015  Notice  3   
7/3/2013  Letter  5   
3/19/2013  Notice of Change of Address  1   
8/7/2012  Letter  11   
5/15/2012  Order Denying  1   
5/7/2012  Birth Certificate  1   
5/7/2012  Motion  107   
5/7/2012  Civil Cover Sheet  2   
4/2/2012  Notice of Change of Address  1   
4/2/2012  Motion  74   
12/5/2011  Letter  3   
11/14/2011  Notice of Change of Address  1   
9/19/2011  Report/Recommendation/Hearing & Order  2   
9/14/2011  Writ of Habeas Corpus  9   
9/12/2011  Writ of Habeas Corpus  9   
9/12/2011  Writ of Habeas Corpus  9   
4/6/2011  Returned Mail  2   
3/30/2011  Report/Recommendation/Hearing & Order  3   
3/28/2011  Child Support Information Sheet  1   
3/28/2011  Certified Notice of Delinquent Support  1   
3/28/2011  Notice to Depository  1   
3/28/2011  Supplemental Financial Statement  1   
3/28/2011  Court Minutes  1   
3/28/2011  HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George    
3/22/2011  Returned Mail  2   
3/11/2011  Motion Set Arrears/Repayment  1   
2/24/2011  Notice of Change of Address  1   
2/24/2011  Memorandum  7   
2/24/2011  Copy/Copies  6   
2/23/2011  Answer  6   
2/18/2011  Alias Summons Returned Served  5   
2/17/2011  Final Order  1   
2/14/2011  HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George    
1/14/2011  Returned Mail  2   
1/4/2011  Notice of Hearing  1   
1/4/2011  Motion Set Arrears/Repayment  1   
11/29/2010  Notice of Change of Address  1   
10/22/2010  Order for Income Deduction  1   
10/22/2010  Report/Recommendation and Final Judgment  4   
10/19/2010  Court Minutes  1   
10/19/2010  Exhibit(s)  2   
10/19/2010  Exhibit(s)  2   
10/19/2010  Child Support Information Sheet  2   
10/19/2010  Child Support Information Sheet  1   
10/19/2010  HEARING - Petition/Motion    
10/8/2010  Returned Mail  2   
9/20/2010  Order for Non Jury Trial  1   
9/17/2010  Notice for Trial  1   
8/12/2010  Response  2   
6/14/2010  Alias Summons Issued  4   
4/9/2010  Summons Returned Unserved  5   
12/17/2009  Summons Issued  4   
12/17/2009  Certificate of Compliance  2   
12/17/2009  Financial Affidavit  4   
12/17/2009  Petition  4   
12/17/2009  Request for Admissions  1   
11/1/2006  Notice of Change of Address    
9/28/2006  HRS673 to Bureau    
7/19/2006  Letter    
7/19/2006  Letter    
5/9/2006  Final Judgment    
5/9/2006  Order for Income Deduction    
5/9/2006  Disposed by Non-Jury Trial    
5/9/2006  Final Judgment    
5/8/2006  HRS673 to Bureau    
4/28/2006  HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated    
4/28/2006  HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated    
4/28/2006  HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated    
4/28/2006  HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A    
4/28/2006  HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated    
4/28/2006  HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated    
4/28/2006  HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated    
4/28/2006  HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A    
4/28/2006  Affidavit    
4/28/2006  Affidavit    
4/28/2006  Court Minutes    
3/29/2006  Order for Non Jury Trial    
3/29/2006  Notice of Hearing    
3/29/2006  Notice for Trial    
3/29/2006  Request to Produce    
3/28/2006  Request for Admissions    
3/28/2006  Notice of Filing HLA Tissue Typing    
2/9/2006  Notice    
1/10/2006  HRS673 to Bureau    
1/5/2006  HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A    
1/5/2006  HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated    
1/5/2006  HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated    
1/5/2006  HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated    
1/5/2006  HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A    
1/5/2006  HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated    
1/5/2006  HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated    
1/5/2006  HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated    
1/5/2006  Court Minutes    
1/5/2006  Financial Affidavit    
1/5/2006  Child Support Information Sheet    
1/5/2006  Child Support Information Sheet    
12/6/2005  Notice of Hearing    
12/6/2005  Order for Non Jury Trial    
12/6/2005  Request to Produce    
12/6/2005  Notice for Trial    
12/5/2005  Answer    
10/31/2005  Summons Returned    
10/31/2005  Summons Returned    
10/27/2005  Answer Denying Allegations    
8/29/2005  Summons Issued    
8/29/2005  Request for Admissions    
8/29/2005  Certificate of Compliance    
8/29/2005  Financial Affidavit    
8/29/2005  Notice of Social Security    
8/29/2005  Civil Cover Sheet    
8/29/2005  Petition    
8/29/2005  Initial Judge Assigned


Date  Hearing  Time  Location  Pages  Doc
3/28/2011  Motion - Winslow, George  8:00 AM    
2/14/2011  Motion - Winslow, George  8:00 AM    
10/19/2010  Petition/Motion  1:00 PM    
4/28/2006  Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated  8:00 AM    
4/28/2006  Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated  8:00 AM    
4/28/2006  Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated  8:00 AM    
4/28/2006  Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A  8:00 AM    
4/28/2006  Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated  8:00 AM    
4/28/2006  Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated  8:00 AM    
4/28/2006  Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated  8:00 AM    
4/28/2006  Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A  8:00 AM    
1/5/2006  Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A  9:00 AM    
1/5/2006  Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated  9:00 AM    
1/5/2006  Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated  9:00 AM    
1/5/2006  Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated  9:00 AM    
1/5/2006  Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A  9:00 AM    
1/5/2006  Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated  9:00 AM    
1/5/2006  Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated  9:00 AM    
1/5/2006  Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated  9:00 AM




Knowledge of the fraud prior to continuance of the proceedings- which was not the case in the following proceedings nor thereafter when I contacted my attorney regarding ineffective counsel.

Barbara Tanner Jones & Tangel-Rodriguez & Associates 222 Weber St, Orlando, FL 32803      Bar Number: 391956  Mail Address: Tangel-Rodriguez & Assoc 222 Weber St Orlando, FL 32803-3831  United States  Office: 407-849-1133  Cell: 407-849-1133     
SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS MACKEY Heather Morcroft (Appellate Atty) 20 n Orange Ave Ste 700 Orlando 32801 FBN 0709859 407-325-3585 Attorney for Jarrid D. Williams Carlos Alberto Gonzalez Bar Number: 656755 Mail Address: Wayne Starr P.A. PO Box 560206 Orlando, FL 32856-0206 United States Office: 407-228-7280 Fax: 407-228-4296 Email: waynestarr@cfl.rr.com

cc:

Knowledge of the fraud prior to continuance of the proceedings- which was not the case in the following proceedings nor thereafter when I contacted my attorney regarding ineffective counsel.

Barbara Tanner Jones & Tangel-Rodriguez & Associates 222 Weber St, Orlando, FL 32803      Bar Number: 391956  Mail Address: Tangel-Rodriguez & Assoc 222 Weber St Orlando, FL 32803-3831  United States  Office: 407-849-1133  Cell: 407-849-1133     
SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS MACKEY Heather Morcroft (Appellate Atty) 20 n Orange Ave Ste 700 Orlando 32801 FBN 0709859 407-325-3585 Attorney for Jarrid D. Williams Carlos Alberto Gonzalez Bar Number: 656755 Mail Address: Wayne Starr P.A. PO Box 560206 Orlando, FL 32856-0206 United States Office: 407-228-7280 Fax: 407-228-4296 Email: waynestarr@cfl.rr.com

Monday, 28 October 2019

Intentional divestation from ethical standards,the Creed of professional ism & perpetuated institution violence, white collar crime

RE:   9457320158 RFA CASE#   1143172973  False Report FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS AFTER AN EARLIER DISMISSED ALLEGATION IN THE FL NINTH DISTRICT JUVENILE COURTS -6 DAYS PRIOR- THE SAME FL DCF CPI'S MISUSE OF OFFICE TO HARASS ME OUT ON THE ORLANDO, FL STREET WITH A SCENE AT A NEIGHBORHOOD GROCER - COPS & OVER INFLATED BEHAVIOUR BY THE ACCOMPANYING CPI WHO GOT OUT THEIR GOVERNMENT VEHICLE YELLING "ITS OVER!, ITS OVER!" LOUD ENOUGH FOR THE SMALL NEIGHBORHOOD BLOCK & COMMUNITY TO FORM SOME TYPE OF OPINION THAT A CRIMINAL ACT OR CHARGE WAS INVOLVED - ESCORTED BY THE POLICE WITH NO COURT PAPER WORK - THEY DETAINED OR TEMPORARILY PLACED THE TWO CHILDREN OVERNIGHT WITH THEIR DADS, (WHO SHE HAD ALREADY CALLED OUT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD BEFORE THE STOP) PRACTICALLY STRANGERS WHO WERE CALLED AS THE OTHER BIOLOGICAL PARENT RATHER THAN THE EXISTENCE OF A PREEXISTING RELATIONSHIP FOR MY KID TO STAY IN A STRANGER'S HOME UNTIL HER FALSE ALLEGATION WAS DISMISSED THE NEXT MORNING. ALL TAKING PLACE WITHIN TWO DAYS OF MY DAUGHTER'S BIRTHDAY "HOLIDAY" ON 1/29/2011. FL CLASSIFIES CRIMES COMMITTED AROUND HOLIDAYS AS HATE CRIMES! OUTRIGHT MOCKERIES THE DAD IS THE ONE WITH NUMEROUS CRIMINAL CHARGES


Dismissed by Judge Anthony H. Johnson

01/27/2011, 6 Days earlier was a fraudulent claim.


Then Handley goes back into her "venue" & lies & reports that there are two missing children on February 3, 2011 in RETALIATION AFTER THEIR INITIAL LOSS.


BUT YOU DIDN'T TELL JUDGE DONALD GRINCEWITZ THAT. NOR DID YOU EVEN MENTION ANYTHING ABOUT A "MISSING CHILD" THAT COULD BE USED IN AN APPEAL ACCORDING TO THE FLORIDA CI   lawyer should not knowingly misstate, distort, or improperly exaggerate any fact or opinion nor permit the lawyer’s silence or inaction to mislead anyone.  What is Fraud on the Court? Fraud on the Court, or Fraud upon the Court, is where a material misrepresentation has been made to the court, or by the court itself. The main requirement is that the impartiality of the court has been so disrupted that it can’t perform its tasks without bias or prejudice. Some examples of fraud on the court include: Fraud in the service of court summons (such as withholding a court summons from a party) Corruption or influence of a court member or official Judicial fraud Intentionally failing to inform the parties of necessary appointments or requirements, in efforts to obstruct the judicial process “Unconscionable” schemes to deceive or make misrepresentations through the court system It’s important to note that fraud on the court only involves court officials or officers of the court, such as judges or court-appointed attorneys. The fraud must be directed at the “judicial machinery” itself. Fraud on the court generally does NOT mean: Fraud between the two opposing parties Submission of fraudulent documents Perjury or false statements by witnesses

For the official who acted in fraud upon the court, they may very well be required to step down from their position and may even be subjected to criminal consequences like a fine or a jail sentence. It could also result in other serious consequences, such as an attorney being disbarred, or a judge being removed from service.


If a court official is found to be biased or prejudiced even before fraud occurs, they are required to excuse themselves from the case, and a different official must be appointed. In some jurisidictions, a trial tainted by fraud on the court will be vacated or set aside for a certain time period


391956  Mail Address: Tangel-Rodriguez & Assoc 222 Weber St Orlando, FL 32803-3831  United States  Office: 407-849-1133  Cell: 407-849-1133   


SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS MACKEY Heather Morcroft (Appellate Atty) 20 n Orange Ave Ste 700 Orlando 32801 FBN 0709859 407-325-3585 Attorney for Jarrid D. Williams  Carlos Alberto Gonzalez Bar Number: 656755 Mail Address: Wayne Starr P.A. PO Box 560206 Orlando, FL 32856-0206 United States Office: 407-228-7280 Fax: 407-228-4296 Email: waynestarr@cfl.rr.com

Case# 482005DR014270A001OX)  THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300    (KNOWLEDGE OF FRAUD AND INTENTIONAL OMISSION BY THE OTHER ATTYS - ". As an officer of the court, a lawyer cannot have his client perjure himself on the stand, that is, if that lawyer knows it is a lie

...What is Fraud on the Court? Fraud on the Court, or Fraud upon the Court, is where a material misrepresentation has been made to the court, or by the court itself. The main requirement is that the impartiality of the court has been so disrupted that it can’t perform its tasks without bias or prejudice. Some examples of fraud on the court include: Fraud in the service of court summons (such as withholding a court summons from a party) Corruption or influence of a court member or official Judicial fraud Intentionally failing to inform the parties of necessary appointments or requirements, in efforts to obstruct the judicial process “Unconscionable” schemes to deceive or make misrepresentations through the court system It’s important to note that fraud on the court only involves court officials or officers of the court, such as judges or court-appointed attorneys. The fraud must be directed at the “judicial machinery” itself. Fraud on the court generally does NOT mean: Fraud between the two opposing parties Submission of fraudulent documents Perjury or false statements by witnesses


For the official who acted in fraud upon the court, they may very well be required to step down from their position and may even be subjected to criminal consequences like a fine or a jail sentence. It could also result in other serious consequences, such as an attorney being disbarred, or a judge being removed from service.


If a court official is found to be biased or prejudiced even before fraud occurs, they are required to excuse themselves from the case, and a different official must be appointed. In some jurisidictions, a trial tainted by fraud on the court will be vacated or set aside for a certain time period (such as two years), to be “reopened” at a later date. 


Saturday, 12 October 2019

Register of Actions
Case No. 2002-DR-050423-I
SHAW, SHEILA J vs. COLEMAN, JIMMY L§
§
§
§
§
§
Case Type:Income Deduction Order
Date Filed:03/09/2002
Location:Family
Uniform Case Number:482002DR050423A001IX
Party Information
Lead Attorneys
PetitionerSHAW, SHEILA J
 
RespondentCOLEMAN, JIMMY L, JR
Events & Orders of the Court
   DISPOSITIONS
03/09/2002  Income Deduction Order
   
   OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS
06/11/2008  Notice of Need for Redirection
Notice of Need for Redirection|NOTICE OF NEED FOR REDIRECTION
05/29/2008  Notice Termination of IV-D Services
Notice Termination of IV-D Services|NOTICE TERMINATION OF IV-D SERVICES
05/29/2008  Notice of Change of Address
Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS OF PAYEE
05/08/2008  Notice Termination of IV-D Services
Notice Termination of IV-D Services|NOTICE TERMINATION OF IV-D SERVICES
04/30/2008  Notice of Need for Redirection
Notice of Need for Redirection|NOTICE OF NEED FOR REDIRECTION
03/19/2007  Notice of Change of Address
Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS OF PAYEE
11/15/2006  Notice of Change of Address
Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS OF PAYEE
08/29/2005  Notice of Change of Address
Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS OF PAYEE
05/17/2005  Notice of Change of Address
Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS
04/18/2005  Notice of Change of Address
Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS OF PAYEE
12/28/2004  Notice of Change of Address
Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS
07/13/2004  Notice of Change of Address
Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS
05/18/2004  Notice of Change of Address
Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS
05/17/2004  Notice of Change of Address
Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS
05/05/2004  Notice of Change of Address
Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS
03/23/2004  Conversion
Conversion|CONVERSION LETTER FROM HRS (PAYMENT REDIRECTION)
01/06/2004  Notice of Change of Address
Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS
11/24/2003  Notice of Change of Address
Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS
11/19/2003  Notice of Change of Address
Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS
11/04/2003  Notice of Need for Redirection
Notice of Need for Redirection|NOTICE OF NEED FOR REDIRECTION
12/10/2002  Case Reassigned to Division
Case Reassigned to Division|CASE REASSIGNED TO JUDGE ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE TO DIVISION 42
10/18/2002  Notice of Change of Address
Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS
03/09/2002  Order
Order|ORDER *
03/09/2002  Order Closing/Disbursing Funds
Order Closing/Disbursing Funds|ORDER CLOSING/DISBURSING FUNDS