Florida Attorney Consumer Assistance Program August online DOJ submitted

INFORMS THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (ACAP) WITHIN THE TIME AND STATUTORY LIMITATIONS OF 6 SIX YEARS, THAT THE FOREGOING COMPLAINT IS IN REGARDS TO THE VIOLATIONS SET FORTH: IS IN REGARDS TO THE VIOLATIONS SET FORTH: http://www.floridabar.org/divexe/rrtfb.nsf/FV/0B6C8E5CDCA464D685257172004B0FBD 4-8 MAINTAINING THE INTEGRITY OF THE PROFESSION RULE 4-8.4 MISCONDUCT THAT ON THE ONSET OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA SHAW, AS THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION 7, ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT: Juvenile Division 2000 E. Michigan St. Suite 300 Orlando, FL 32806 PROCEEDING WERE COMMENCED WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE, THAT FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS TOOK PLACE, AND THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF PROCEEDINGS ATTORNEY DECEIT OCCURRED INCLUDING INTENTIONAL CONCEALMENT OF THE FACTS REGARDING CONCURRENT CASE ACTIVITY FOR CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT AND RECOVERY OF CHILD SUPPORT ARREARAGES WERE ONGOING IN THE MONTH DISTRICT FAMILY COURT, DIVISIONS 42 & 38, CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT AGAINST HARRIS DESHAUN WILLIAMS AND CARLOS ALBERTO GONZALEZ AND HAD BEEN ONGOING FOR SEVERAL YEARS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF ENTRY INTO JUVENILE DEPENDENCY PROCEEDINGS AS OF FEBRUARY 3, 2011, ALSO THE DATE OF WHICH FRAUD WAS COMMITED, FALSE ALLEGATIONS THAT ISIS SHAW AND MICHYL SHAW WERE ALLEGEDLY MISSING. ALLEGATIONS NEVER SPOKEN AGAIN IN ANY COURT PROCEEDINGS VERIFIABLE BY COURT RECORD OF MINUTES OF THE COURT THAT NO REFERENCE OF SUPPORTIVE AFFIDAVITS, NOT CRIMINAL CHARGES HAD BEEN ENTERED INTO COURT, RATHER A CONTINUATION OF UNFOUNDED HARASSMENT INITIATED NOT BY THE PATERNAL DAD'S BUT THROUGH MISCONDUCT OF FLORIDA DCF CHILD PROTECTION INVESTIGATOR DIVISION. IT IS FURTHER NOTES THAT MULTIPLE EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT OCCURRED CONCEALING THE MISCONDUCT BY A DCF EMPLOYEE. SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS MACKEY Heather Morcroft (Appellate Atty) 20 n Orange Ave Ste 700 Orlando 32801 FBN 0709859 407-325-3585 Attorney for Jarrid D. Williams Carlos Alberto Gonzalez Bar Number: 656755 Mail Address: Wayne Starr P.A. PO Box 560206 Orlando, FL 32856-0206 United States Office: 407-228-7280 Fax: 407-228-4296 Email: waynestarr@cfl.rr.com Personal Bar URL: www.floridabar.org/mybar profile/656755 vCard: County: Orange Circuit: 9 Admitted: 05/15/1987 10-Year Discipline History: None Law School: Stetson University College of Law, 1986 Thank you for > contacting the Attorney General's Office regarding > ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT . Our > staff will process it as soon as possible and, if necessary, > respond appropriately. We appreciate hearing from concerned > citizens such as yourself. If you wish to keep abreast of > the activities of this office, you may wish to consider a > subscription to our electronic newsletter Weekly > Briefing. Or perhaps > our Consumer > Alerts. Should you wish to > subscribe to either, or both, publications, please visit > oursubscription > page. > > > > > > > > > > COMPLAINT FILED > AGAINST > RUSSELL SCOTT > HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire= > Retained > 407-786-2889( > 1110 Douglas > Ave > Altamonte Springs, FL > 32714 > (407) > 786-2889 > http://www.russellhlaw.com > > > > ATTORNEY > MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT & CHILD SUPPORT > RECOVERY ACT VIOLATIONS, FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION > LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING > JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW > VIOLATIONS > > > > > http://www.hinshawlaw.com/the-lawyers-lawyer-newsletter---recent-developments-in-risk-management-03-09-2012/ > > > Duty to report > misconduct; code of > conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 > > > > > ( TORT LAW: A tort is a > civil wrong resulting from a violation of a legal right not > created by contract for which monetary redress is provided. > This may be (a) an act or (b) an omission. More formally, a > tort may be defined as a wrongful act or omission arising in > the course of social re ships other than contracts which > violates a person's legally protected rights for which > the law provides a remedy in the form of an action for > damages. > > > There are two basic > classifications of torts: (a) negligence which is the result > of an unintentional act (b) intentional acts or omissions > which results in a breach of someone's rights. There is > a third group in this area that should be explained. It is > referred to as strict liability.) > > > > > > > 8-2.241 > > > Civil Laws Governing Law > Enforcement Misconduct > BUT ALSO LAWS THAT ARE > FOR THE PREVENTION OF NEGLECT OF THE CHILD. > 827.03 Abuse, aggravated > abuse, and neglect of a child; penalties.— > > > intentional act that > could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental > injury to > a child; > or > (c) Active encouragement > of any person to commit an act that results or could > reasonably be > expected to result in > physical or mental injury to a child. > A person who knowingly or > willfully abuses a child without causing great bodily > harm, > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: professional > misconduct, failure to comply nonprofit compliance, ethnic > biasness and duty to report misconduct by attorney of > judicial misconduct > > > signed and filed a valid > declaration of paternity that has the force and effect of > a judgment, enforceable by contempt > REQUIREMENT OF > STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED PROCEDURES TO IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS > OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT > > > Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] > (a) In order to satisfy section 454(20)(A), each State must > have in effect laws requiring the use of the following > procedures, consistent with this section and with > regulations of the Secretary, to increase the effectiveness > of the program which the State administers under this > part: > > > > > Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] > (a > > > (C) Voluntary paternity > acknowledgment.— > > > (iv) Use of paternity > acknowledgment affidavit.—Such procedures must require the > State to develop and use an affidavit for the voluntary > acknowledgment of paternity which includes the minimum > requirements of the affidavit specified by the Secretary > under section 452(a)(7) for the voluntary acknowledgment of > paternity, and to give full faith and credit to such an > affidavit signed in any other State according to its > procedures. > > > > THERE HAS BEEN A BREACH > OF DUTY/NEGLECT OF DUTY WHEREAS ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION WOULD > HAVE REMEDIED AN EXTENSIVE DELAY IN PROVIDING ADEQUATE CHILD > SUPPORT OR FINANCIAL SUPPORT. IT IS ALSO MORE THAT SUSPECTED > THAT THE UNTIMELY DELAYS AREASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING > BREACH(ES) > the 1996 reforms require > States to adopt laws that give the CSE agency authority to > initiate a series of expedited procedures without the > necessity of obtaining an order from any other > administrative agency or judicial tribunal > > > and > > > > > > > The Violence > Against Women Act of 1994 (VAWA) and the 1997 Omnibus > Consolidated Appropriations Act > > > > > and > > > > > MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER > STATE AND FEDERAL LAW > > > You cannot use > information available to you because of your job, but > not > available to the public, > for your personal benefit or for the benefit of > others. > § 112.313(8), Fla. > Stat. > > > Title VI allows persons > to file administrative complaints with the federal > departments and agencies that provide financial assistance > alleging discrimination based on race, color, or national > origin by recipients of federal funds. > Under Title VI, EPA has a > responsibility to ensure that its funds are not being used > to subsidize discrimination based on race, color, or > national origin. This prohibition against discrimination > under Title VI has been a statutory mandate since 1964 and > EPA has had Title VI regulations since 1973. > EPA's Office of Civil > Rights is responsible for the Agency's administration of > Title VI, including investigation of such ... > > > A registered support > order is confirmed and immediately enforceable unless the > respondent files an objection in a record within a fixed > period of time, almost invariably the 20 days suggested > originally, Sections 603 and 607. > Section > 604. > > > > > TITLE 42 SECTIONS 666 AND > 654, 657 COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION CITATION FROM THE > FEDERAL STATUTE OF THE US CODE > § 657. Distribution of > collected support > > > > > The following is an > abstract from the Administration for Children and > Families' website and the Administration for Child > Support Enforcement, both of which publish all statutory > guidelines for the collection of child support and payments > thereof to the recipient. > collection and > distribution of child support payments Within this site it > is defined as follows Frequently Asked Questions about Child > Support Collection/Distribution For answers to questions > about your own case, you need to check with your local or > state child support office. State CSE agency telephone > numbers and addresses are at > (English):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ > directories/ext/IVd_list.cfm > (Spanish):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ > directories/ext/Espanol_IVd_ list.cfm State CSE agency web > site links are on our web site at the following > location: > http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/ > programs/cse/extinf.htm#exta The following general > information may be helpful: If the state collects more in a > month than is to be paid to the family for their current and > past due support, the rest of the money can be used to repay > the state and federal governments for cash assistance * AFDC > or TANF * that a family received. Also, child support > agencies can recover all or part of the costs of their > services from people who are not in a cash assistance > program. These can include the cost of legal work done by > agency attorneys or the costs of locating a parent, for > example. The money may be deducted from the child support > payment, or it may be collected from the noncustodial > parent. For more information on changes in the law and how > they may affect you, as well as the cost recovery practices > of your State, you should contact your State child support > enforcement agency. > > > > > > > Case Type: Paternity > DOR > Date Filed: > 08/29/2005 > Location: Div > 42 > Judicial Officer: Evans, > Robert M > > > Uniform Case Number: > 482005DR014270A001OX > > > Related Case Information > Related Cases > 2002-DR-006249-O > (Paternity) > Party > Information > > > Lead > Attorneys > Petitioner SHAW, SHEILA > JOCELYN BARBARA FANCHER (LIMITED) JONES, > Esquire > Retained > 407-849-1133(W) > > > Respondent GONZALEZ, > CARLOS ALBERTO > > > Events & Orders of > the Court DISPOSITIONS > 05/15/2012 > Order Denying (Judicial > Officer: Evans, Robert M) > > Tuesday, June 18, > 2013 12:39 PM > Subject: ATTORNEY > GENERAL COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST Hershkowitz Russell S > Attorney Category: Bankruptcy Law [Edit] 1110 Douglas Ave > Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 (407) 786-2889 > http://www.russellhlaw.com > > > > > > > Thank you for > contacting the Attorney General's Office regarding > ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT . Our > staff will process it as soon as possible and, if necessary, > respond appropriately. We appreciate hearing from concerned > citizens such as yourself. If you wish to keep abreast of > the activities of this office, you may wish to consider a > subscription to our electronic newsletter Weekly > Briefing. Or perhaps > our Consumer > Alerts. Should you wish to > subscribe to either, or both, publications, please visit > oursubscription > page. > > > > > > > > > > COMPLAINT FILED > AGAINST > RUSSELL SCOTT > HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire= > Retained > 407-786-2889( > 1110 Douglas > Ave > Altamonte Springs, FL > 32714 > (407) > 786-2889 > http://www.russellhlaw.com > > > > ATTORNEY > MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT & CHILD SUPPORT > RECOVERY ACT VIOLATIONS, FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION > LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING > JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW > VIOLATIONS > > > > > http://www.hinshawlaw.com/the-lawyers-lawyer-newsletter---recent-developments-in-risk-management-03-09-2012/ > > > Duty to report > misconduct; code of > conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 > > Edit with the Docs app Make tweaks, leave comments, and share with others to edit at the same time. NO THANKSUSE THE APP ACAP ATTY COMPLAINT 112,FRAUD ON THE COURT INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM ATTACHED DOCUMENT TO THE FLORIDA BAR THE SPECIFIC THING OR THINGS I AM COMPLAINING ABOUT ARE: THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA JOCELYN SHAW PO BOX 5147, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33657-5175 PARTY TO THE COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S) FLORIDA BAR MEMBER(S): SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS MACKEY Heather Morcroft (Appellate Atty) 20 n Orange Ave Ste 700 Orlando 32801 FBN 0709859 407-325-3585 INFORMS THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (ACAP) WITHIN THE TIME AND STATUTORY LIMITATIONS OF 6 SIX YEARS, THAT THE FOREGOING COMPLAINT IS IN REGARDS TO THE VIOLATIONS SET FORTH: http://www.floridabar.org/divexe/rrtfb.nsf/FV/0B6C8E5CDCA464D685257172004B0FBD 4-8 MAINTAINING THE INTEGRITY OF THE PROFESSION RULE 4-8.4 MISCONDUCT THAT ON THE ONSET OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA SHAW, AS THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION 7, ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT: Juvenile Division 2000 E. Michigan St. Suite 300 Orlando, FL 32806 PROCEEDING WERE COMMENCED WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE HISTORICAL AND CONCURRENT CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS, AND HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS CONCURRENTLY PUBLISHED IN DIVISION 42 COURT, VIA CLERK OF THE ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE RISS DATABASE, THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR ACCOUNTS OF INTERAGENCY ACCESS WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. THE COMPLAINANT MAKES REFERENCE THAT THE ATTORNEY’S, WITH KNOWLEDGE, ACTED IN A DECEITFUL MANNER, NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF FRAUD RELATIVE TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS. "ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW WERE DIVESTED AND SUBSEQUENT LEGAL CAUSATION INCLUSIVE OF : 1. A MATERIAL INJURY IN THE PROCEEDINGS BELOW THAT CANNOT BE CONCLUDED ON POST JUDGEMENT APPEAL,2. INJURY WAS CAUSED BY A DEPARTURE FORM THE ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW (WHEN THEY ARE VIOLATED) OCCURRED. IMPROPER PURPOSE USED TO ACCESS TO THE FACILITY/HARASSMENT & TORTS)CONTINUATION OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT Fw: REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION TO REOPEN CASE CASE NO 2005-DR-014270-O DIVISION 42; Fw: ATTN KEITH PARKS Action founded on negligence, fraud and white collar criminal behavior 39.0141 A Missing Children Report is Required and is found to be absent in all proceedings prior to date. & 95.11 Tort actions for fraud or assault & 39.0014,39.0141 MISSING CHILDRENS REPORT REQUIRED WHICH IN ITS ABSENCE AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS CONSTITUTES FRAUD. TORT ACTIONS OF FRAUD INCLUSIVE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND VAWA BY THE FATHERS TO CASE WHO KNEW THE ALLEGATIONS WERE FALSE THE ATTORNEY’S TO CASE DID NOT CONSOLIDATE THE TWO DIVISIONS, DIVISION 7 AND DIVISION 42, WITH KNOWLEDGE THAT A “THRESHOLD OF DEMONSTRATIVE SHOWING OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT” IN ADDITION TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CHILD WOULD BE NECESSARY UNDER PROVISIONS OUTLINED REGARDING MINORS TO JUVENILE DEPENDENCY COURT CIVIL RULES OF PRACTICE, FLORIDA STATUTES CHAPTER 39.PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO CHILDREN THE DEVASTATION FROM THE PRESIDING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL PROCESS ALONG WITH THE STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT, ATTORNEY DECEIT INCLUDED THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS: § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. Civil contempt is conduct directed against the rights of the opposing party. law-imposed obligation ;"an act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere with the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the dignity of the court or respect for its authority. There are two kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct contempt openly and in the presence of the court, resists the power of the court, 102 A. 400, 406; and consequential, or constructive contempt results from matters outside the court, such as failure to comply with orders. The basic standards governing fraud on the court are reasonably straightforward. As set forth in Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998): The requisite fraud on the court occurs where “it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.” Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989) . . . . The trial court has the inherent authority, within the exercise of sound judicial discretion, to dismiss an action when a plaintiff has perpetrated a fraud on the court, or where a party refuses to comply with court orders. Kornblum v. Schneider, 609 So. 2d 138, 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). The types of issues raised in habeas corpus petitions were coded into the following categories: ineffective assistance of counsel (failure to object to admissibility/sufficiency of evidence, failure to call witnesses, failure to cross-examine, and failure to object to denial of a continuance notion), trial court errors (failure to suppress improper evidence, improper jury instructions), (failure to disclose, use of perjured testimony, and inflammatory summation), 4th amendment (unlawful arrest), 5th amendment Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Title VIII consists of seven sections and is also referred to as the "Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of 2002". It describes specific criminal penalties for manipulation, destruction or alteration of financial records or other interference with investigations, while providing certain protections for whistleblowers. cc: (http://www.floridabar.org/divexe/rrtfb.nsf/FV/0B6C8E5CDCA464D685257172004B0FBD) A lawyer shall not: (a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another; (b) commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects; (c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, except that it shall not be professional misconduct for a lawyer for a criminal law enforcement agency or regulatory agency to advise others about or to supervise another in an undercover investigation, unless prohibited by law or rule, and it shall not be professional misconduct for a lawyer employed in a capacity other than as a lawyer by a criminal law enforcement agency or regulatory agency to participate in an undercover investigation, unless prohibited by law or rule; (d) engage in conduct in connection with the practice of law that is prejudicial to the administration of justice, including to knowingly, or through callous indifference, disparage, humiliate, or discriminate against litigants, jurors, witnesses, court personnel, or other lawyers on any basis, including, but not limited to, on account of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, national origin, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, age, socioeconomic status, employment, or physical characteristic; (e) state or imply an ability to influence improperly a government agency or official or to achieve results by means that violate the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law; (f) knowingly assist a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct or other law; (g) fail to respond, in writing, to any official inquiry by bar counsel or a disciplinary agency, as defined elsewhere in these rules, when bar counsel or the agency is conducting an investigation into the lawyer's conduct. A written response shall be made:(1) within 15 days of the date of the initial written investigative inquiry by bar counsel, grievance committee, or board of governors; (2) within 10 days of the date of any follow-up written investigative inquiries by bar counsel, grievance committee, or board of governors; (3) within the time stated in any subpoena issued under these Rules Regulating The Florida Bar (without additional time allowed for mailing); (4) as provided in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure or order of the referee in matters assigned to a referee; and (5) as provided in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure or order of the Supreme Court of Florida for matters pending action by that court. Except as stated otherwise herein or in the applicable rules, all times for response shall be calculated as provided elsewhere in these Rules Regulating The Florida Bar and may be extended or shortened by bar counsel or the disciplinary agency making the official inquiry upon good cause shown. Failure to respond to an official inquiry with no good cause shown may be a matter of contempt and processed in accordance with rule 3-7.11(f) of these Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. (h) willfully refuse, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, to timely pay a child support obligation; or (i) engage in sexual conduct with a client or a representative of a client that exploits or adversely affects the interests of the client or the lawyer-client relationship. If the sexual conduct commenced after the lawyer-client relationship was formed it shall be presumed that the sexual conduct exploits or adversely affects the interests of the client or the lawyer-client relationship. A lawyer may rebut this presumption by proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the sexual conduct did not exploit or adversely affect the interests of the client or the lawyer-client relationship. The prohibition and presumption stated in this rule do not apply to a lawyer in the same firm as another lawyer representing the client if the lawyer involved in the sexual conduct does not personally provide legal services to the client and is screened from access to the file concerning the legal representation.Comment Lawyers are subject to discipline when they violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another, as when they request or instruct an agent to do so on the lawyer's behalf. Subdivision (a), however, does not prohibit a lawyer from advising a client concerning action the client is legally entitled to take, provided that the client is not used to indirectly violate the Rules of Professional Conduct. Many kinds of illegal conduct reflect adversely on fitness to practice law, such as offenses involving fraud and the offense of willful failure to file an income tax return. However, some kinds of offense carry no such implication. Traditionally, the distinction was drawn in terms of offenses involving "moral turpitude." That concept can be construed to include offenses concerning some matters of personal morality, such as adultery and comparable offenses, that have no specific connection to fitness for the practice of law. Although a lawyer is personally answerable to the entire criminal law, a lawyer should be professionally answerable only for offenses that indicate lack of those characteristics relevant to law practice. Offenses involving violence, dishonesty, breach of trust, or serious interference with the administration of justice are in that category. A pattern of repeated offenses, even ones of minor significance when considered separately, can indicate indifference to legal obligation. A lawyer may refuse to comply with an obligation imposed by law upon a good faith belief that no valid obligation exists. The provisions of rule 4-1.2(d) concerning a good faith challenge to the validity, scope, meaning, or application of the law apply to challenges of legal regulation of the practice of law. Subdivision (c) recognizes instances where lawyers in criminal law enforcement agencies or regulatory agencies advise others about or supervise others in undercover investigations, and provides an exception to allow the activity without the lawyer engaging in professional misconduct. The exception acknowledges current, acceptable practice of these agencies. Although the exception appears in this rule, it is also applicable to rules 4-4.1 and 4-4.3. However, nothing in the rule allows the lawyer to engage in such conduct if otherwise prohibited by law or rule. Subdivision (d) of this rule proscribes conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice. Such proscription includes the prohibition against discriminatory conduct committed by a lawyer while performing duties in connection with the practice of law. The proscription extends to any characteristic or status that is not relevant to the proof of any legal or factual issue in dispute. Such conduct, when directed towards litigants, jurors, witnesses, court personnel, or other lawyers, whether based on race, ethnicity, gender, religion, national origin, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, age, socioeconomic status, employment, physical characteristic, or any other basis, subverts the administration of justice and undermines the public's confidence in our system of justice, as well as notions of equality. This subdivision does not prohibit a lawyer from representing a client as may be permitted by applicable law, such as, by way of example, representing a client accused of committing discriminatory conduct. Lawyers holding public office assume legal responsibilities going beyond those of other citizens. A lawyer's abuse of public office can suggest an inability to fulfill the professional role of attorney. The same is true of abuse of positions of private trust such as trustee, executor, administrator, guardian, or agent and officer, director, or manager of a corporation or other organization. A lawyer's obligation to respond to an inquiry by a disciplinary agency is stated in subdivision (g) of this rule and subdivision (h)(2) of rule 3-7.6. While response is mandatory, the lawyer may deny the charges or assert any available privilege or immunity or interpose any disability that prevents disclosure of a certain matter. A response containing a proper invocation thereof is sufficient under the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. This obligation is necessary to ensure the proper and efficient operation of the disciplinary system. Subdivision (h) of this rule was added to make consistent the treatment of attorneys who fail to pay child support with the treatment of other professionals who fail to pay child support, in accordance with the provisions of section 61.13015, Florida Statutes. That section provides for the suspension or denial of a professional license due to delinquent child support payments after all other available remedies for the collection of child support have been exhausted. Likewise, subdivision (h) of this rule should not be used as the primary means for collecting child support, but should be used only after all other available remedies for the collection of child support have been exhausted. Before a grievance may be filed or a grievance procedure initiated under this subdivision, the court that entered the child support order must first make a finding of willful refusal to pay. The child support obligation at issue under this rule includes both domestic (Florida) and out-of-state (URESA) child support obligations, as well as arrearages. Subdivision (i) proscribes exploitation of the client or the lawyer-client relationship by means of commencement of sexual conduct. The lawyer-client relationship is grounded on mutual trust. A sexual relationship that exploits that trust compromises the lawyer-client relationship. Attorneys have a duty to exercise independent professional judgment on behalf of clients. Engaging in sexual relationships with clients has the capacity to impair the exercise of that judgment.FALSE STATEMENTS MISCONDUCT FALSE KIDNAPPING REPORTS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AND TO THE JUVENILE COURT LEGAL PHILANTHROPY MISUSE OF OFFICE INSTITUTIONAL CHILD ABUSE LEGAL ABUSE LAWYER MISCONDUCT ETHNIC BIASEDNESS MOCKERY TRIAL ERROR INTENTIONAL OMISSIONS ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NON SUPPORT & CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY ACT VIOLATIONS, FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW VIOLATIONS THAT ON THE ONSET OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA SHAW, AS THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION 7, ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT: Juvenile Division 2000 E. Michigan St. Suite 300 Orlando, FL 32806 PROCEEDING WERE COMMENCED WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE HISTORICAL AND CONCURRENT CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS, AND HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS CONCURRENTLY PUBLISHED IN DIVISION 42 COURT, VIA CLERK OF THE ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE RISS DATABASE, THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR ACCOUNTS OF INTERAGENCY ACCESS WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. THE COMPLAINANT MAKES REFERENCE THAT THE ATTORNEY’S, WITH KNOWLEDGE, ACTED IN A DECEITFUL MANNER, NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF FRAUD RELATIVE TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS. "ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW WERE DIVESTED AND SUBSEQUENT LEGAL CAUSATION INCLUSIVE OF : 1. A MATERIAL INJURY IN THE PROCEEDINGS BELOW THAT CANNOT BE CONCLUDED ON POST JUDGEMENT APPEAL,2. INJURY WAS CAUSED BY A DEPARTURE FORM THE ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW (WHEN THEY ARE VIOLATED) OCCURRED. THE ATTORNEY’S TO CASE DID NOT CONSOLIDATE THE TWO DIVISIONS, DIVISION 7 AND DIVISION 42, WITH KNOWLEDGE THAT A “THRESHOLD OF DEMONSTRATIVE SHOWING OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT” IN ADDITION TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CHILD WOULD BE NECESSARY UNDER PROVISIONS OUTLINED REGARDING MINORS TO JUVENILE DEPENDENCY COURT CIVIL RULES OF PRACTICE, FLORIDA STATUTES CHAPTER 39.PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO CHILDREN THE DEVASTATION FROM THE PRESIDING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL PROCESS ALONG WITH THE STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT, ATTORNEY DECEIT INCLUDED THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS: § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. Civil contempt is conduct directed against the rights of the opposing party. law-imposed obligation ;"an act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere with the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the dignity of the court or respect for its authority. There are two kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct contempt openly and in the presence of the court, resists the power of the court, 102 A. 400, 406; and consequential, or constructive contempt results from matters outside the court, such as failure to comply with orders. The basic standards governing fraud on the court are reasonably straightforward. As set forth in Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998): The requisite fraud on the court occurs where “it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.” Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989) . . . . The trial court has the inherent authority, within the exercise of sound judicial discretion, to dismiss an action when a plaintiff has perpetrated a fraud on the court, or where a party refuses to comply with court orders. Kornblum v. Schneider, 609 So. 2d 138, 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). The types of issues raised in habeas corpus petitions were coded into the following categories: ineffective assistance of counsel (failure to object to admissibility/sufficiency of evidence, failure to call witnesses, failure to cross-examine, and failure to object to denial of a continuance notion), trial court errors (failure to suppress improper evidence, improper jury instructions), (failure to disclose, use of perjured testimony, and inflammatory summation), 4th amendment (unlawful arrest), 5th amendment Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Title VIII consists of seven sections and is also referred to as the "Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of 2002". It describes specific criminal penalties for manipulation, destruction or alteration of financial records or other interference with investigations, while providing certain protections for whistleblowers. cc: Letter regarding fraud on the court,absent administrative remedy or action in a timely manner, that such a biasedness occurred it is described as unconscionably ethnically biased, a white collar criminal act by a party who misused his/her office to aid and assist avoidance of judicial action, that the action was in violation of the minor to case’s rights, that the action was in violation of parental rights to recovery of child support and paternity establishment in the Orange County, Ninth Judicial Circuit and Court, Division 42. Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:39 PM Subject: ATTORNEY GENERAL COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST Hershkowitz Russell S Attorney Category: Bankruptcy Law [Edit] 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 (407) 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com Thank you for contacting the Attorney General's Office regarding ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT . Our staff will process it as soon as possible and, if necessary, respond appropriately. We appreciate hearing from concerned citizens such as yourself. If you wish to keep abreast of the activities of this office, you may wish to consider a subscription to our electronic newsletter Weekly Briefing. Or perhaps our Consumer Alerts. Should you wish to subscribe to either, or both, publications, please visit our subscription page. COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST RUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire= Retained 407-786-2889( 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 (407) 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NON SUPPORT & CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY ACT VIOLATIONS, FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW VIOLATIONS http://www.hinshawlaw.com/the-lawyers-lawyer-newsletter---recent-developments-in-risk-management-03-09-2012/ The duty to report misconduct is one of the ethical duties imposed on attorneys in the United States by the rules governing professional responsibility. With certain exceptions, an attorney who becomes aware that either a fellow attorney or a judge has committed an act in violation of the rules of e... Duty to report misconduct; code of conduct https://www.facebook.com/OrangClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 ( TORT LAW: A tort is a civil wrong resulting from a violation of a legal right not created by contract for which monetary redress is provided. This may be (a) an act or (b) an omission. More formally, a tort may be defined as a wrongful act or omission arising in the course of social re ships other than contracts which violates a person's legally protected rights for which the law provides a remedy in the form of an action for damages. There are two basic classifications of torts: (a) negligence which is the result of an unintentional act (b) intentional acts or omissions which results in a breach of someone's rights. There is a third group in this area that should be explained. It is referred to as strict liability.) 8-2.241 Civil Laws Governing Law Enforcement Misconduct BUT ALSO LAWS THAT ARE FOR THE PREVENTION OF NEGLECT OF THE CHILD. 827.03 Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; penalties.— intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child; or (c) Active encouragement of any person to commit an act that results or could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child. A person who knowingly or willfully abuses a child without causing great bodily harm, Subject: professional misconduct, failure to comply nonprofit compliance, ethnic biasedness and duty to report misconduct by attorney of judicial misconduct signed and filed a valid declaration of paternity that has the force and effect of a judgment, enforceable by contempt REQUIREMENT OF STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED PROCEDURES TO IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] (a) In order to satisfy section 454(20)(A), each State must have in effect laws requiring the use of the following procedures, consistent with this section and with regulations of the Secretary, to increase the effectiveness of the program which the State administers under this part: Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] (a (C) Voluntary paternity acknowledgment.— (iv) Use of paternity acknowledgment affidavit.—Such procedures must require the State to develop and use an affidavit for the voluntary acknowledgment of paternity which includes the minimum requirements of the affidavit specified by the Secretary under section 452(a)(7) for the voluntary acknowledgment of paternity, and to give full faith and credit to such an affidavit signed in any other State according to its procedures. THERE HAS BEEN A BREACH OF DUTY/NEGLECT OF DUTY WHEREAS ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION WOULD HAVE REMEDIED AN EXTENSIVE DELAY IN PROVIDING ADEQUATE CHILD SUPPORT OR FINANCIAL SUPPORT. IT IS ALSO MORE THAT SUSPECTED THAT THE UNTIMELY DELAYS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING BREACH(ES) the 1996 reforms require States to adopt laws that give the CSE agency authority to initiate a series of expedited procedures without the necessity of obtaining an order from any other administrative agency or judicial tribunal and The Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (VAWA) and the 1997 Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act and MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW You cannot use information available to you because of your job, but not available to the public, for your personal benefit or for the benefit of others. § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. Title VI allows persons to file administrative complaints with the federal departments and agencies that provide financial assistance alleging discrimination based on race, color, or national origin by recipients of federal funds. Under Title VI, EPA has a responsibility to ensure that its funds are not being used to subsidize discrimination based on race, color, or national origin. This prohibition against discrimination under Title VI has been a statutory mandate since 1964 and EPA has had Title VI regulations since 1973. EPA's Office of Civil Rights is responsible for the Agency's administration of Title VI, including investigation of such ... A registered support order is confirmed and immediately enforceable unless the respondent files an objection in a record within a fixed period of time, almost invariably the 20 days suggested originally, Sections 603 and 607. Section 604. TITLE 42 SECTIONS 666 AND 654, 657 COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION CITATION FROM THE FEDERAL STATUTE OF THE US CODE § 657. Distribution of collected support The following is an abstract from the Administration for Children and Families' website and the Administration for Child Support Enforcement, both of which publish all statutory guidelines for the collection of child support and payments thereof to the recipient. collection and distribution of child support payments Within this site it is defined as follows Frequently Asked Questions about Child Support Collection/Distribution For answers to questions about your own case, you need to check with your local or state child support office. State CSE agency telephone numbers and addresses are at (English):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ directories/ext/IVd_list.cfm (Spanish):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ directories/ext/Espanol_IVd_ list.cfm State CSE agency web site links are on our web site at the following location: http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/ programs/cse/extinf.htm#exta The following general information may be helpful: If the state collects more in a month than is to be paid to the family for their current and past due support, the rest of the money can be used to repay the state and federal governments for cash assistance * AFDC or TANF * that a family received. Also, child support agencies can recover all or part of the costs of their services from people who are not in a cash assistance program. These can include the cost of legal work done by agency attorneys or the costs of locating a parent, for example. The money may be deducted from the child support payment, or it may be collected from the noncustodial parent. For more information on changes in the law and how they may affect you, as well as the cost recovery practices of your State, you should contact your State child support enforcement agency. Outline of Children's Rights IN WHICH THESE VIOLATIONS EXPLOITED THE MINORS IN PROCEEDINGS INCLUDE: 1. The right to basic necessities of food, clothing and shelter. 2. The right to quality medical attention. 3. The right to equal education. 4. The right to be treated fairly, regardless of age, mental development, gender, race or culture. 5. The right to speak up and be heard when they are injured. 6. The right to be treated with care in our medical facilities. 7. The right to a safe environment in which they can play and learn. 8. The right to equal protection from law enforcement. 9. The right to equal representation in our legal system. 10. The right to pursue opportunities designed to help them reach their full potential in life. From: nine09digits@yahoo.com To: Karlene_Cole-Palmer@dcf.state.fl.us Sent: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 2:41 PM EST Subject: WHITE COLLAR CRIME COMPLAINT STARTING WITH THE CPI RISS ACCESS TAX REFUND INTERFERENCE Fw: enforcement of Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code, a statute that criminalizes false statements made directly or indirectly to the Federal government. Central RegionKarlene Cole-Palmer CLS Regional Director Children’s Legal Services Department of Children and Families 400 West Robinson Street, Suite S1114 Orlando, Florida 32801 Office: (407) 245-0530 E-mail: Karlene_Cole-Palmer@dcf.state.fl.us Karlene Cole-Palmer,it is believed that the CPI in this complaint accessed the SDU, state disbursement unit on February 3rd,2011 and February 4th 2011 to intercept child support payments, as indicated by a SDU representative upon inquiry regarding a recent child support order, judgement, issued by Division 42, Orange County, Florida, respondent and payor, Carlos Alberto Gonzalez. The CPI false allegations were intended to intercept payments, indicative as a white collar economic crime, fraud. The CPI made this intercept by deception on the court and fraud alleging that my children had been kidnapped as a dismissal was entered agaiinst Felicia Handley, the CPI in this complaint on January 28th, 2011 after without a court order or any documentation she not only harassed me in public, but violated the children's and my rights the evening of January 27th, 2011 arriving at a convience store with the Orlando Police Department. Felicia Handley's accompanying agent jumped out a gray yelling "it's over", 'its over" as witnessed by Orlando Police Department. The incident occurred on the evening of Michyl Shaw's science night at Ferncreek Elementary, whereas the parents and the children were transported by Orange County District Schools to Ferncreek Elementary and then home again. Shortly after departing off the school bus and walking over to the covenience store nearby our residence, the police and a gray car that Handley and the accompanying agent were in, pulled up in front of the convience store and detained myself and my children stating that they had a right to take the children that evening until court the following morning, and that they had already contacted the fathers of the children prior to arrival which is where the children were to be taken in to temporary custody without an order from the court until the hearing the following morning on January 28th, 2011. At the hearing held in the judicial chambers of Judge Anthony Johnson, DCF representatives, the CPI, Felicia Handley were informed that there would be a dismissal and the children were to attend school, and until further notice of an eviction from the residential address, no action would be heard.Felicia Hankley follows with a malicious, attrocious lie about missing children and kidnapping, that both Michyl Shaw and Isis Shaw had been missing since February 3, 2011, which was false, and verifiable by the children's primary doctor who had seen both children on the evening of February 3rd, 2011 while in the custody of the mother, myself. In addition, no staff members or persons of authority at the residential dwelling had ever given such information to Felicia Handley. I am inquiring as to what action under Florida and Federal Statute has been taken against Felicia Handley or the Department in addition to further evidence of fraud on the court, intentional omission by DCF departmental attorneys constituting attorney deciet and misconduct, of child support recovery proceedings in division 42 of which the mother and the children were under representation druing which time there ware repeated "reserved actions", and actions in the case regarding termination of parental rights which were unauthorized, not consulted upon or actions that continued to delay recovery and collection from what is referred legal as CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT, under federal recovery. Chapter 39 details what is referred to as a "threshold of demonstrative illustration" by the noncustodical parent of financial support outside of any family support or mental support in the interests of the children (PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO CHILDREN http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0000-0099/0039/0039.html) Sec. 411. Data collection and reporting Social Security Act Title IV https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/programs/css/child_support_handbook_with_toc.pdf The federal child support program wasestablished in 1975 under Title IV-D of the SocialSecurity Act. Case number 482005DR14270A001OX >>>>>2005DR1427 Case Type: Paternity DOR Date Filed: 08/29/2005 Location: Div 42 Judicial Officer: Evans, Robert M Uniform Case Number: 482005DR014270A001OX Related Case Information Related Cases 2002-DR-006249-O (Paternity) Party Information Petitioner SHAW, SHEILA JOCELYN Lead Attorneys BARBARA FANCHER (LIMITED) JONES, Esquire Retained 407-849-1133(W) Respondent GONZALEZ, CARLOS ALBERTO Events & Orders of the Court DISPOSITIONS 05/15/2012 Order Denying (Judicial Officer: Evans, Robert M) Comment (Petitioner's Motion/Writ of Habeas Corpus Contesting Custody Order) 09/19/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & Order (Judicial Officer: Evans, Robert M) Comment (Denying Petitioner's Writ of Habeas Corpus/Contempt of Court Order) 03/30/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & Order (Judicial Officer: Evans, Robert M) Comment (Final Order on Motion to Set Arrears) 02/17/2011 Final Order (Judicial Officer: Evans, Robert M) Comment (on motion withdrawal of motion to set reserved arrears) 10/22/2010 Report/Recommendation and Final Judgment (Judicial Officer: Roche, Renee A) Comment (Petition for Support) 05/09/2006 Final Judgment OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS 08/07/2012 Letter to Judge Evans (Faxed) w/attached Re: Child Support 05/07/2012 Civil Cover Sheet 05/07/2012 Motion for writ of Habeas Corpus contesting custody order/Modification of visitation w/att (Re-Closed 5/15/12) 05/07/2012 Birth Certificate as to Male Child 04/02/2012 Motion for writ habeas corpus contesting custody order w/att (Re-Closed 5/15/12) 04/02/2012 Notice of Change of Address 12/05/2011 Letter Amended Letter/Writ of Habeas Corpus to Hearing Officer/Court 11/14/2011 Notice of Change of Address 09/14/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus contempt of court order w/att (Re-Closed 09/19/11) 09/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus contempt of court order w/att (Re-Closed 09/19/11) 09/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus contempt of court order w/att (Re-Closed 09/19/11) 04/06/2011 Returned Mail 03/28/2011 Motion (8:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Winslow, George) Result: Report and Recommendation 03/28/2011 Court Minutes 03/28/2011 Supplemental Financial Statement 03/28/2011 Notice to Depository Request for Multiple Adjustments to Collections 03/28/2011 Certified Notice of Delinquent Support 03/28/2011 Child Support Information Sheet 03/22/2011 Returned Mail 03/11/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment and Notice of Hearing on 3/28/11 @ 8am in Rm 540 (Re-Closed 03/30/11) 02/24/2011 Copy/Copies of Child Support and Federal Law 02/24/2011 Memorandum from Office of the Attorney General Re: Prosecutive Guidelines & Procedures for Child Support Recovery Act of 1992 02/24/2011 Notice of Change of Address 02/23/2011 Answer 02/18/2011 Alias Summons Returned Served 7/28/10 02/14/2011 Motion (8:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Winslow, George) Result: No Action 01/14/2011 Returned Mail 01/04/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment Reserved (reclosed 2/17/11) 01/04/2011 Notice of Hearing 2/14/11 @ 8am 11/29/2010 Notice of Change of Address 10/22/2010 Order for Income Deduction 10/19/2010 Petition/Motion (1:00 PM) (Magistrate Winslow, George) Parties Present Result: Report and Recommendation 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) Pet #2 (Support Guidelines Worksheet) 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) Pet #1 (Supplemental Financial Statement) 10/19/2010 Court Minutes 10/08/2010 Returned Mail 09/20/2010 Order for Non Jury Trial 10/19/10 @ 1pm Rm.540 09/17/2010 Notice for Trial Non-Jury 08/12/2010 Response with Regards to Summons Received Regarding Child Support 06/14/2010 Alias Summons Issued 04/09/2010 Summons Returned Unserved 12/17/2009 Request for Admissions (supplemental support) to 12/17/2009 Petition supplemental for support & other relief (Re-Closed 10/22/10) 12/17/2009 Financial Affidavit 12/17/2009 Certificate of Compliance 12/17/2009 Summons Issued re: supplemental petition for support 11/01/2006 Notice of Change of Address Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS 09/28/2006 HRS673 to Bureau HRS673 to Bureau|HRS673 TO BUREAU Letter|LETTER FILED FROM JUDICIAL ASSISTANT 07/19/2006 Letter Letter|LETTER FILED TO JUDGE RE: CHILD SUPPORT 05/09/2006 Final Judgment Final Judgment|FINAL JUDGMENT PATERNITY RECORDED 05/09/2006 Disposed by Non-Jury Trial Disposed by Non-Jury Trial|DISPOSED BY NON JURY TRIAL 05/09/2006 Order for Income Deduction Order for Income Deduction|ORDER FOR INCOME DEDUCTION 05/08/2006 HRS673 to Bureau HRS673 to Bureau|HRS673 TO BUREAU 04/28/2006 Court Minutes Court Minutes|MINUTES HEARING 04/28/2006 Affidavit Affidavit|STATE CASE REGISTRY INFORMATION 04/28/2006 Affidavit Affidavit|FINAN CIAL STATEMENT 04/28/2006 Status Hearing (8:00 AM) (Judicial Officers Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Roche, Renee A) 04/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial (8:00 AM) (Judicial Officers Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Roche, Renee A) 03/29/2006 Request to Produce Request to Produce|REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO 03/29/2006 Notice for Trial Notice for Trial|NOTICE FOR NON JURY TRIAL 03/29/2006 Notice of Hearing Notice of Hearing|NOTICE OF HEARING * 04/28/2006 08:00 A.M. 03/29/2006 Order for Non Jury Trial Order for Non Jury Trial|ORDER FOR NON JURY TRIAL [04/28/2006] 08:00 A.M. 03/28/2006 Notice of Filing HLA Tissue Typing Notice of Filing HLA Tissue Typing|NOTICE FILING HLA TISSUE TYPING 03/28/2006 Request for Admissions Request for Admissions |REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO 02/09/2006 Notice Notice|NTS OF PARENTAGE TESTING APPOINTMENT 03/01/06 @ 1:20 P.M. 01/10/2006 HRS673 to Bureau HRS673 to Bureau|HRS673 TO BUREAU 01/05/2006 Child Support Information Sheet Child Support Information Sheet|CHILD SUPPORT INFORMATION SHEET 01/05/2006 Child Support Information Sheet Child Support Information Sheet|CHILD SUPPORT INFORMATION SHEET 01/05/2006 Financial Affidavit Financial Affidavit|SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT 01/05/2006 Court Minutes Court Minutes|MINUTES HEARING 01/05/2006 Non-Jury Trial (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officers Roche, Renee A, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated) 01/05/2006 Status Hearing (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officers Roche, Renee A, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated) 12/06/2005 Notice for Trial Notice for Trial|NOTICE FOR NON JURY TRIAL 12/06/2005 Request to Produce Request to Produce|REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO 12/06/2005 Order for Non Jury Trial Order for Non Jury Trial|ORDER FOR NON JURY TRIAL [01/05/2006] 09:00 A.M. 12/06/2005 Notice of Hearing Notice of Hearing|NOTICE OF HEARING * 01/05/2006 09:00 A.M. 12/05/2005 Answer Answer|ANSWER 10/31/2005 Summons Returned Summons Returned|SUMMONS SERVED [10/10/2005] 10/31/2005 Summons Returned Summons Returned|SUMMONS SERVED [10/10/2005] 10/27/2005 Answer Denying Allegations Answer Denying Allegations|ANSWER DENYING ALLEGATIONS 08/29/2005 Initial Judge Assigned Initial Judge Assigned|INITIAL JUDGE ASSIGNED EVANS, ROBERT M 42 08/29/2005 Petition Petition|PETITION - DOR 08/29/2005 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet|CIVIL COVER SHEET FILED 08/29/2005 Notice of Social Security Notice of Social Security|NOTICE OF SOCIAL SECURITY 08/29/2005 Financial Affidavit Financial Affidavit|FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT 08/29/2005 Certificate of Compliance Certificate of Compliance|CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 08/29/2005 Request for Admissions Request for Admissions |REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO 08/29/2005 Summons Issued Summons Issued|SUMMONS ISSUED Financial Information Petitioner SHAW, SHEILA JOCELYN Total Financial Assessment 50.00 Total Payments and Credits 0.00 Balance Due as of 11/14/2012 50.00 09 Register of Actions Case No. 2010-DR-000170-O SHAW, SHEILA JOCELYN KARENA vs. WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN § § § § § § § Case Type: Child Support DOR Date Filed: 01/06/2010 Location: Div 42 Judicial Officer: Evans, Robert M Uniform Case Number: 482010DR000170A001OX Related Case Information Related Cases 2011-DR-006367-O (Child Support) Party Information Petitioner SHAW, SHEILA JOCELYN KARENA Lead Attorneys ANA ELENA (LIMITED) TANGEL RODRIGUEZ, Esquire Retained 407-849-1133(W) Respondent WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN Events & Orders of the Court DISPOSITIONS 03/24/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & Order (Judicial Officer: Evans, Robert M) Comment (Final Order on Motion to Set Arrears) 01/12/2011 Final Order (Judicial Officer: Evans, Robert M) Comment (on Withdrawal of Motion to Set Reserved Arrears) 04/06/2010 Final Judgment (Judicial Officer: Roche, Renee A) Comment (for Support Recorded) OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS 08/02/2012 Answer w/att (Unsigned) 05/07/2012 Motion FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 05/07/2012 Birth Certificate as to Female Child 04/23/2012 Summons Returned Unserved 04/12/2012 Summons Issued 04/11/2012 Request for Admissions (Support) 04/11/2012 Petition/Motion for Modification 04/11/2012 Civil Cover Sheet 04/02/2012 Motion for writ of habeas corpus contesting custody order w/att 04/02/2012 Notice of Change of Address 11/14/2011 Notice of Change of Address 03/21/2011 Motion (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Winslow, George) Result: Report and Recommendation 03/21/2011 Court Minutes 03/15/2011 Returned Mail 03/02/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment and Notice of Hearing on 3/21/11 @ 1:30pm in Rm 540 (Re-Closed 03/24/11) 03/01/2011 Civil Cover Sheet 01/10/2011 Motion (8:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Winslow, George) Result: No Action 12/02/2010 Notice of Hearing on 1/10/11 @ 8am 12/01/2010 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment Reserved (Re-Closed 01/12/11) 12/01/2010 Civil Cover Sheet 11/29/2010 Notice of Change of Address 04/06/2010 Order for Income Deduction 03/31/2010 Petition/Motion (8:00 AM) () Parties Present Result: Report and Recommendation 03/31/2010 Supplemental Financial Statement 03/31/2010 Support Guidelines Worksheet 03/31/2010 Child Support Information Sheet 03/31/2010 Child Support Information Sheet 03/31/2010 Court Minutes 02/12/2010 Order for Non Jury Trial 3/31/10 @ 8am Rm.540 02/12/2010 Order for Non Jury Trial 3/31/10 @ 8am Rm.540 02/10/2010 Notice for Trial Non Jury 02/04/2010 Summons Returned Served 1/16/10 01/28/2010 Answer w/att 01/06/2010 Summons Issued 01/06/2010 Civil Cover Sheet 01/06/2010 Petition FOR SUPPORT AND OTHER RELIEF 01/06/2010 Request for Admissions 01/06/2010 Financial Affidavit 01/06/2010 Certificate of Compliance Financial Information Respondent WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN Total Financial Assessment 15.00 Total Payments and Credits 15.00 Balance Due as of 11/14/2012 0.00 05/20/2010 Transaction Assessment 15.00 05/20/2010 Counter Payment Receipt # DR-2010-15610 WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN (15.00) > > > ( TORT LAW: A tort is a > civil wrong resulting from a violation of a legal right not > created by contract for which monetary redress is provided. > This may be (a) an act or (b) an omission. More formally, a > tort may be defined as a wrongful act or omission arising in > the course of social re ships other than contracts which > violates a person's legally protected rights for which > the law provides a remedy in the form of an action for > damages. > > > There are two basic > classifications of torts: (a) negligence which is the result > of an unintentional act (b) intentional acts or omissions > which results in a breach of someone's rights. There is > a third group in this area that should be explained. It is > referred to as strict liability.) > > > > > > > 8-2.241 > > > Civil Laws Governing Law > Enforcement Misconduct > BUT ALSO LAWS THAT ARE > FOR THE PREVENTION OF NEGLECT OF THE CHILD. > 827.03 Abuse, aggravated > abuse, and neglect of a child; penalties.— > > > intentional act that > could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental > injury to > a child; > or > (c) Active encouragement > of any person to commit an act that results or could > reasonably be > expected to result in > physical or mental injury to a child. > A person who knowingly or > willfully abuses a child without causing great bodily > harm, > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: professional > misconduct, failure to comply nonprofit compliance, ethnic > biasness and duty to report misconduct by attorney of > judicial misconduct > > > signed and filed a valid > declaration of paternity that has the force and effect of > a judgment, enforceable by contempt > REQUIREMENT OF > STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED PROCEDURES TO IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS > OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT > > > Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] > (a) In order to satisfy section 454(20)(A), each State must > have in effect laws requiring the use of the following > procedures, consistent with this section and with > regulations of the Secretary, to increase the effectiveness > of the program which the State administers under this > part: > > > > > Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] > (a > > > (C) Voluntary paternity > acknowledgment.— > > > (iv) Use of paternity > acknowledgment affidavit.—Such procedures must require the > State to develop and use an affidavit for the voluntary > acknowledgment of paternity which includes the minimum > requirements of the affidavit specified by the Secretary > under section 452(a)(7) for the voluntary acknowledgment of > paternity, and to give full faith and credit to such an > affidavit signed in any other State according to its > procedures. > > > > THERE HAS BEEN A BREACH > OF DUTY/NEGLECT OF DUTY WHEREAS ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION WOULD > HAVE REMEDIED AN EXTENSIVE DELAY IN PROVIDING ADEQUATE CHILD > SUPPORT OR FINANCIAL SUPPORT. IT IS ALSO MORE THAT SUSPECTED > THAT THE UNTIMELY DELAYS AREASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING > BREACH(ES) > the 1996 reforms require > States to adopt laws that give the CSE agency authority to > initiate a series of expedited procedures without the > necessity of obtaining an order from any other > administrative agency or judicial tribunal > > > and > > > > > > > The Violence > Against Women Act of 1994 (VAWA) and the 1997 Omnibus > Consolidated Appropriations Act > > > > > and > > > > > MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER > STATE AND FEDERAL LAW > > > You cannot use > information available to you because of your job, but > not > available to the public, > for your personal benefit or for the benefit of > others. > § 112.313(8), Fla. > Stat. > > > Title VI allows persons > to file administrative complaints with the federal > departments and agencies that provide financial assistance > alleging discrimination based on race, color, or national > origin by recipients of federal funds. > Under Title VI, EPA has a > responsibility to ensure that its funds are not being used > to subsidize discrimination based on race, color, or > national origin. This prohibition against discrimination > under Title VI has been a statutory mandate since 1964 and > EPA has had Title VI regulations since 1973. > EPA's Office of Civil > Rights is responsible for the Agency's administration of > Title VI, including investigation of such ... > > > A registered support > order is confirmed and immediately enforceable unless the > respondent files an objection in a record within a fixed > period of time, almost invariably the 20 days suggested > originally, Sections 603 and 607. > Section > 604. > > > > > TITLE 42 SECTIONS 666 AND > 654, 657 COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION CITATION FROM THE > FEDERAL STATUTE OF THE US CODE > § 657. Distribution of > collected support > > > > > The following is an > abstract from the Administration for Children and > Families' website and the Administration for Child > Support Enforcement, both of which publish all statutory > guidelines for the collection of child support and payments > thereof to the recipient. > collection and > distribution of child support payments Within this site it > is defined as follows Frequently Asked Questions about Child > Support Collection/Distribution For answers to questions > about your own case, you need to check with your local or > state child support office. State CSE agency telephone > numbers and addresses are at > (English):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ > directories/ext/IVd_list.cfm > (Spanish):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ > directories/ext/Espanol_IVd_ list.cfm State CSE agency web > site links are on our web site at the following > location: > http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/ > programs/cse/extinf.htm#exta The following general > information may be helpful: If the state collects more in a > month than is to be paid to the family for their current and > past due support, the rest of the money can be used to repay > the state and federal governments for cash assistance * AFDC > or TANF * that a family received. Also, child support > agencies can recover all or part of the costs of their > services from people who are not in a cash assistance > program. These can include the cost of legal work done by > agency attorneys or the costs of locating a parent, for > example. The money may be deducted from the child support > payment, or it may be collected from the noncustodial > parent. For more information on changes in the law and how > they may affect you, as well as the cost recovery practices > of your State, you should contact your State child support > enforcement agency. > > > > > > > Case Type: Paternity > DOR > Date Filed: > 08/29/2005 > Location: Div > 42 > Judicial Officer: Evans, > Robert M > > > Uniform Case Number: > 482005DR014270A001OX > > > Related Case Information > Related Cases > 2002-DR-006249-O > (Paternity) > Party > Information > > > Lead > Attorneys > Petitioner SHAW, SHEILA > JOCELYN BARBARA FANCHER (LIMITED) JONES, > Esquire > Retained > 407-849-1133(W) > > > Respondent GONZALEZ, > CARLOS ALBERTO > > > Events & Orders of > the Court DISPOSITIONS > 05/15/2012 > Order Denying (Judicial > Officer: Evans, Robert M) VAWA REPORT REGARDING NOT ONLY ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT IN CHILD CUSTODY MODIFICATION Intentionally omitted criminal nonsupport, offensive behaviour, professional misconduct and ethnic biasedness, child exploitation and institutional racism Title 42 section 42 1983, 14141 attorney prosecutorial child chustody exploitation including false statements never heard throughout case trial activity, false statements to commence proceedings Case Type: Paternity Date Filed: 4/24/2002 Location: Div 38 UCN: 482002DR006249A001OX Judge: Patricia A Doherty Status: Closed - SRS Date Description Pages Doc Request Doc 7/10/2013 Letter 12 3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address 1 1/1/2007 Case Reassigned to Division 2/11/2005 Notice 11/10/2004 Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 11/10/2004 Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Smith, Maura T 9/24/2004 Court Minutes 9/24/2004 Affidavit 9/13/2004 Pluries Summons Unserved 7/28/2004 Pluries Summons Served 7/27/2004 Notice of Hearing 7/16/2004 Motion to Dismiss 7/14/2004 Notice of Unavailability 7/14/2004 Notice Appearance of Counsel 7/1/2004 Affidavit of Lost/Destroyed Instrument 7/1/2004 Pluries Summons Issued 4/16/2004 Pluries Summons Issued 1/6/2004 Returned Mail 12/26/2003 Certificate of Mailing 12/26/2003 Affidavit 12/26/2003 Notice of Action Issued 10/13/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved 9/12/2003 Pluries Summons Issued 9/3/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved 9/3/2003 Affidavit 9/3/2003 Motion 9/3/2003 Motion for Default 9/3/2003 Affidavit 9/3/2003 Motion 9/3/2003 Motion for Default 8/4/2003 Pluries Summons Issued 7/31/2003 Request for Admissions 6/9/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved 5/21/2003 Pluries Summons Issued 5/1/2003 Third Party Summons 2/11/2003 Pluries Summons Issued 12/26/2002 Pluries Summons Served 11/8/2002 Pluries Summons Issued 9/24/2002 Pluries Summons Unserved 8/30/2002 Pluries Summons Issued 7/29/2002 Summons Returned 7/3/2002 Alias Summons Issued 5/15/2002 Summons Returned 4/24/2002 Summons Issued 4/24/2002 Affidavit of Non Military Service 4/24/2002 Request for Admissions 4/24/2002 Affidavit of Need 4/24/2002 Certificate of Compliance 4/24/2002 Financial Affidavit 4/24/2002 Civil Cover Sheet 4/24/2002 Petition 4/24/2002 Initial Judge Assigned Case Type: Paternity DOR Date Filed: 8/29/2005 Location: Div 42 UCN: 482005DR014270A001OX Judge: Heather P Rodriguez Status: Re-Closed Citation Number: Date Description Pages Doc Request Doc 3/3/2016 Returned Mail 3 2/11/2016 Order Denying 2 2/11/2016 Order Denying 2 4/14/2015 Motion to Vacate 10 4/14/2015 Notice 3 7/3/2013 Letter 5 3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address 1 8/7/2012 Letter 11 5/15/2012 Order Denying 1 5/7/2012 Birth Certificate 1 5/7/2012 Motion 107 5/7/2012 Civil Cover Sheet 2 4/2/2012 Notice of Change of Address 1 4/2/2012 Motion 74 12/5/2011 Letter 3 11/14/2011 Notice of Change of Address 1 9/19/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & Order 2 9/14/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 9/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 9/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 4/6/2011 Returned Mail 2 3/30/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & Order 3 3/28/2011 Child Support Information Sheet 1 3/28/2011 Certified Notice of Delinquent Support 1 3/28/2011 Notice to Depository 1 3/28/2011 Supplemental Financial Statement 1 3/28/2011 Court Minutes 1 3/28/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George 3/22/2011 Returned Mail 2 3/11/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment 1 2/24/2011 Notice of Change of Address 1 2/24/2011 Memorandum 7 2/24/2011 Copy/Copies 6 2/23/2011 Answer 6 2/18/2011 Alias Summons Returned Served 5 2/17/2011 Final Order 1 2/14/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George 1/14/2011 Returned Mail 2 1/4/2011 Notice of Hearing 1 1/4/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment 1 11/29/2010 Notice of Change of Address 1 10/22/2010 Order for Income Deduction 1 10/22/2010 Report/Recommendation and Final Judgment 4 10/19/2010 Court Minutes 1 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) 2 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) 2 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet 2 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet 1 10/19/2010 HEARING - Petition/Motion 10/8/2010 Returned Mail 2 9/20/2010 Order for Non Jury Trial 1 9/17/2010 Notice for Trial 1 8/12/2010 Response 2 6/14/2010 Alias Summons Issued 4 4/9/2010 Summons Returned Unserved 5 12/17/2009 Summons Issued 4 12/17/2009 Certificate of Compliance 2 12/17/2009 Financial Affidavit 4 12/17/2009 Petition 4 12/17/2009 Request for Admissions 1 11/1/2006 Notice of Change of Address 9/28/2006 HRS673 to Bureau 7/19/2006 Letter 7/19/2006 Letter 5/9/2006 Final Judgment 5/9/2006 Order for Income Deduction 5/9/2006 Disposed by Non-Jury Trial 5/9/2006 Final Judgment 5/8/2006 HRS673 to Bureau 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 4/28/2006 Affidavit 4/28/2006 Affidavit 4/28/2006 Court Minutes 3/29/2006 Order for Non Jury Trial 3/29/2006 Notice of Hearing 3/29/2006 Notice for Trial 3/29/2006 Request to Produce 3/28/2006 Request for Admissions 3/28/2006 Notice of Filing HLA Tissue Typing 2/9/2006 Notice 1/10/2006 HRS673 to Bureau 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 Court Minutes 1/5/2006 Financial Affidavit 1/5/2006 Child Support Information Sheet 1/5/2006 Child Support Information Sheet 12/6/2005 Notice of Hearing 12/6/2005 Order for Non Jury Trial 12/6/2005 Request to Produce 12/6/2005 Notice for Trial 12/5/2005 Answer 10/31/2005 Summons Returned 10/31/2005 Summons Returned 10/27/2005 Answer Denying Allegations 8/29/2005 Summons Issued 8/29/2005 Request for Admissions 8/29/2005 Certificate of Compliance 8/29/2005 Financial Affidavit 8/29/2005 Notice of Social Security 8/29/2005 Civil Cover Sheet 8/29/2005 Petition 8/29/2005 Initial Judge Assigned VOR (Viewable on Request) Certain case documents contain sensitive or personally identifiable information that must be manually redacted before they are viewable by the general public. Documents listed in the Docket Events section as VOR are public documents that require further redaction by Clerk staff before they can be viewed. Follow the steps below to request access to these documents: Check the Request Doc checkbox for the document you wish to view. You may repeat this for other VOR documents on the same case. Once all document requests have been made for this case, click the Submit button. A confirmation screen will display, where you will be asked to enter or confirm your email address to finalize your request. You will receive an initial email notification to confirm your request, followed by additional email notifications as requested documents become available. The Clerk’s office makes every effort to complete these requests in a timely manner. For definitions of document types, please refer to our glossary. Hearings Date Hearing Time Location Pages Doc 3/28/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 AM 2/14/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 AM 10/19/2010 Petition/Motion 1:00 PM 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 8:00 AM 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM Cause of Action Fraud Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141: makes it unlawful for state or local law enforcement agencies to allow officers to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives persons of rights protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. This law is commonly referred to as the Police Misconduct Statute. the exintimate partner and public officer employee misconduct BUSINESS TORT RELATED-ADVERSARIAL TORTS OR MATERNAL INJURIES WITH INTENT http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer_29.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/any-police-department-receiving-federal.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/family-violence-prevention-act-victim.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/false-cpi-personal-torts-tort-of-fraud.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/jarrid-williams-probation-dc-346801.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/201 Federal laws Federal law 42 U.S.C. § 5772 & 42 U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5772) defines a "missing child" as "any individual less than 18 years of age whose whereabouts are unknown to such individual"s legal custodian." RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. 827.03 Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; penalties.— intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child; or (c) Active encouragement of any person to commit an act that results or could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child. A person who knowingly or willfully abuses a child without causing great bodily harm, http://definitions.uslegal/ com/w/willful-professional- misconduct PRINCIPAL CASES - HOME STATE ORIGIN INDIANA REGISTER OF ACTIONS CASE NO. 1993-CF-008458-AO cases: OC9901243 PA cases OC9901243 and 02-83719047104532 PA Cause number 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL Narrative "an act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere with the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the dignity of the court or respect for its authority. There are two kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct contempt openly and in the presence of the court, resists the power of the court, 102 A. 400, 406; and consequential, or constructive contempt results from matters outside the court, such as failure to comply... MISUSE OF OFFICE TO ENGAGE IN RACIAL PROFILING, FRAUD, AIDING AND ABETTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT RECOVERY BY FALSE ALLEGATIONS USED TO ABATE DEPARTMENTAL COLLECTION INTERVENTIONS ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT AND MOTHER TO CASES IN THE FAMILY COURT, AND CHILD SUPPORT OCSE, AFFILIATED WITH FLORIDA DCF DEPARTMENTAL RISS SYSTEM DATABASES ON FEBRUARY 4TH, 2011 DURING WHICH TIME COURT DATES OR CONCURRENT ENFORCEMENT ACTION WAS BEING UNDERGONE. CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 MANDATORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERA #Employee Misconduct http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/03/7750844white-collar-crime-victim.html, http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/12/you-cannot-use-information-available-to.html OIG Investigative and Law Enforcement Authority The Office of Inspector General (OIG), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), was administratively established by the Secretary of Agriculture in 1962 following a major criminal fraud scandal affecting several agencies within USDA. OIG was later legislatively established by Congress under the Inspector General Act of 1978 (Public Law [P.L.] 95-452), as amended. Pursuant to the Inspector General Act of 1978 and Section 1337 of the Agriculture and Food Act of 1981 (P.L. 97-98), OIG Investigations is the law enforcement arm of the Department, with Department-wide investigative jurisdiction. OIG Special Agents conduct investigations of significant criminal activities involving USDA programs, operations, and personnel, and are authorized to make arrests, execute warrants, and carry firearms. The types of investigations conducted by OIG Special Agents involve criminal activities such as frauds in subsidy, price support, benefits, and insurance programs; significant thefts of Government property or funds; bribery; extortion; smuggling; and assaults on employees. Investigations involving criminal activity that affects the health and safety of the public, such as meat packers who knowingly sell hazardous food products and individuals who tamper with food regulated by USDA, are also high-profile investigative priorities. In addition, OIG Special Agents are poised to provide emergency law enforcement response to USDA declared emergencies and suspected incidents of terrorism affecting USDA regulated industries, as well as USDA programs, operations, personnel, and installations, in coordination with Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies, as appropriate. The enactment of the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-37) authorized OIG to receive funds and property through criminal and civil Federal forfeiture proceedings, and through equitable sharing of forfeited funds and property controlled by the U.S. Department of Justice. Forfeiture proceeds have severe restrictions mandated by statutes and U.S. Department of Justice policy as to how they are used. Forfeiture funds cannot be used in lieu of the OIG's regular appropriations. False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE (NO. 180-4 https://drive.google.com/folder/d/0B84_tgjFbXNLcUpfaDBSRHBSZDQ/editATORY REPORTING REQUIiREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Clearly outlines employee fraud and misconduct within the scope of cause f action by the Office of the Inspector General within the Florida Departmentof Children. § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § 775.085) (complaint ACAP THE FLORIDA BAR INQUIRY COMPLAINT FORM http://goo.gl/h9wjQr) http://www.dcf.state.fl.us/admin/ig/content/AR2013-14.pdf Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses wdith false reporting for adults. https://oig.justice.gov/hotline/contact-doj.htm cc: letter to OIG FL DCF Keith Parks Resending Complaint Attached Department form (complaint ACAP THE FLORIDA BAR INQUIRY COMPLAINT FORM Fw: ATTN KEITH PARKS CONTINUING INSPECTOR GENERAL MANDATORY REPORTING TO IG OFFICE, MISCONDUCT COMPLAINT Aug 10, 2015, 12:19 PM § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § 775.085 Enhances penalty for crimes evidencing "prejudice based on the race, color, ancestry, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, mental or physical disability, or advanced age of the victim. The duty to report misconduct is one of the ethical duties imposed on attorneys in the United States by the rules governing professional responsibility http://www.iape.org/index.php http://definitions.uslegal. com/w/willful-professional- misconduct/ Rule 8.3—Reporting Professional Misconduct (a) A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, shall inform the appropriate professional authority. (b) A lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for office shall inform the appropriate authority. (c) This rule does not require disclosure of information otherwise protected by Rule 1.6 or other law TITLE 42 SECTIONS 666 AND 654, 657 COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION CITATION FROM THE FEDERAL STATUTE OF THE US CODE § 657. Distribution of collected support 50 STATE TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT PROCESS http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/child-support-process-administrative-vs-judicial.aspx Child support orders can be established by the courts or by an administrative entity. Statutes Pertaining to Violations of Civil Rights Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Every person who, under color or any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of any State of Territory, subjects ... any citizen of the United States ... to the deprivation of any rights, privileges or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress. Felony to Interfere With Civil Rights Title 42 U.S.C § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights (1) Preventing officer from performing duty. If two or more persons ... conspire to prevent ... any person from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof; or to injure him in his person or property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official duties. (2) Obstructing justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror. If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to deter, by force, intimidation, or threat, any party or witness in any court of the United States from attending such court, or from testifying to any matter pending therein, freely, fully, and truthfully, or to injure such party or witness in his person or property on account of his having so attended or testified, or to influence the verdict, presentment, or indictment of any grand or petit juror in any such court, or to injure such juror in his person or property on account of any verdict, presentment, or indictment lawfully assented to by him, or of his being or having been such juror; or if two or more persons conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the law, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws; (3) Depriving persons of rights or privileges. If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire, or go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another, for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws, or for the purpose of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of any State or Territory from giving or securing to all persons within such State or Territory the equal protection of the laws; ... or to injure any citizen in person or property on account of such support or advocacy; in any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages, occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators. Title 42 U.S.C. § 1985 pertains to a conspiracy to interfere with civil rights, (1) to prevent an officer from performing a duty; (2) obstructing justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror; (3) or depriving persons of rights or privileges. Title 42 U.S.C. § 1986. Action for neglect to prevent conspiracy Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned in the preceding section [42 USCS § 1985], are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses to do so, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented; And such damages may be recovered in an action on the case; and any number of persons guilty of such wrongful neglect or refusal may be joined as defendants in the action, and if the death of any party be caused by any such wrongful act and neglect, the legal representatives of the deceased shall have such action therefore, and may recover not exceeding five thousand dollars damages therein, for the benefit of the widow of the deceased, if there be one, and if there be no widow, then for the benefit of the next of kin of the deceased. But no action under the provisions of this section shall be sustained which is not commenced within one year after the cause of action has accrued. Keith Parks, Inspector General 1317 Winewood Blvd., Bldg. 5, Second Floor Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700 Phone: (850) 488-1225 Fax: (850) 488-1428 Maxine McGregor Client Relations Coordinator Email: Maxine_McGregor@dcf.state.fl.us Address: 400 West Robinson Street Hurston Bldg., South Tower, S S-1106 Orlando Florida 32801 United States Phone Number: 407-317-7000 x7047 ACCESS Florida Gretchen Perry Client Relations Coordinator Address: 400 West Robinson Street Hurston Bldg., South Tower, S S-1106 Orlando Florida 32801 United States Phone Number: 407-317-7000 x7045 1) CPS may only place founded reports on the state's central registry of child abuse and neglect. (In some states, unfounded reports are placed on the central registry, which not only causes harm to innocent people but is also a violation of due process.) 2) Caseworkers must inform families if a report is anonymous. (There is a difference between anonymous and confidential—reporters’ names should be kept confidential, but anonymous reports are not as reliable as those made by known reporters.) 3) Parents must be allowed to select an unrelated adult to be present during interviews of their children. 4) Investigations must cease immediately upon discovery that the allegations are false. Continuing the investigation process despite proof of innocence only traumatizes the family and wastes state resources. 5) Parents must have access to the records of their investigations. HSLDA also continues to assist with incorporating the following two federal CAPTA requirements into state codes: 1) Requiring child protective services workers to be trained in their duty to protect the statutory and constitutional rights of those they are investigating. 2) Requiring child protective services personnel to advise individuals subject to a child abuse and neglect investigation of the complaint or allegation made against them. Notes 1. Children’s Bureau. (2003). Child Maltreatment. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved fromhttp://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm03/index.htm. 2. Calabretta v. Floyd, 189 F.3d 808 (1999). Claudia Hernandez 400 W. Robinson St. (Hurston South Tower) Ste. # S-509, Orlando, FL 32801-1718 WHITE COLLAR CRIMES ABUSE OF PROCESS PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT LAWYER MISCONDUCT JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT Saturday, 12 December 2015 You cannot use information available to you because of your job, but not available to the public, for your personal benefit or for the benefit of others. § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § 775.085 Enhances penalty for crimes evidencing "prejudice based on the race, color, ancestry, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, mental or physical disability, or advanced age of the victim. The duty to report misconduct is one of the ethical duties imposed on attorneys in the United States by the rules governing professional responsibility http://www.iape.org/index.php http://definitions.uslegal. com/w/willful-professional- misconduct/ Rule 8.3—Reporting Professional Misconduct (a) A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, shall inform the appropriate professional authority. (b) A lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for office shall inform the appropriate authority. (c) This rule does not require disclosure of information otherwise protected by Rule 1.6 or other law. http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309048893 Cases 2005-DR-014270-O (Paternity) P I I Lead Attorneys Petitioner SHAW, SHEILA J BARBARA FANCHER(LIMITED) JONES, Esquire Retained 407-849-1133(W) Respondent GONZALEZ, CARLOS A RUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire Retained 407-786-2889(W) E & O C & O C DISPOSITIONS 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 2004 OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS 01/01/ Case Reassigned to Division 2007 Case Reassigned to Division|CASE REASSIGNED TO JUDGE 38 02/11/ Notice 2005 Notice|NOTICE OF CONCLUSION OF REPRESENTATION 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 2004 Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing|FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL AFTER HEARING RECORDED RELATED CASES - PRINCIPAL JUDICIAL OR PROFESSION MISCONDUCT-FRAUD ON THE COURTS- PERSONAL AND BUSINESS TORT RELATED-ADVERSARIAL TORTS OR MATERNAL INJURIES WITH INTENT http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer_29.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/any-police-department-receiving-federal.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/family-violence-prevention-act-victim.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/false-cpi-personal-torts-tort-of-fraud.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/jarrid-williams-probation-dc-346801.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/201 Federal laws Federal law 42 U.S.C. § 5772 & 42 U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5772) defines a "missing child" as "any individual less than 18 years of age whose whereabouts are unknown to such individual"s legal custodian." RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. 827.03 Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; penalties.— intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child; or (c) Active encouragement of any person to commit an act that results or could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child. A person who knowingly or willfully abuses a child without causing great bodily harm, http://definitions.uslegal. com/w/willful-professional- misconduct PRINCIPAL CASES - HOME STATE ORIGIN INDIANA REGISTER OF ACTIONS CASE NO. 1993-CF-008458-AO cases: OC9901243 PA cases OC9901243 and 02-83719047104532 PA Cause number 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL 2010-DP 1170 FL INDIANA CASE NUMBERS Paternity case file no J18720 filed 11-16-71/11-24-71 order date Shirley Ann Shaw/Claude R. Jackson mariired December 31st, 1978 marriage license number CDR-94-114 Shirley Ann Shaw Joseph Nikolaenko marriage ended June 30, 1995 Buddmeeks Ctr Domestic case DCM-91-6993 1991 marriage license number 02D01-9707-ML-001399 07/08/97 married on 07/26/1997 DOB 04/21/46 Joseph Nikolaenko mother Michlaina Nikolaenko 5012 Pacer Run Ft. Wayne, IN Gwedolyn Ann Brown DOB 04/12/60 son Tyrese Dartanvan Brown father Thomas Lewis Brown mother Mary Lee Spann 3054 Schele Ave Ft. Wayne, IN Dorothy Jackson Claude Jackson married July 2, 1983 Divorce petition 02C01-9110-D1-1313 CDR-91-1313 "...Additionally, whether substantive or procedural misconduct is the basis for the sanction, the trial court must hold an evidentiary hearing before dismissing a case with prejudice,8 and must make an express finding that the conduct forming the basis for the dismissal was willful or done in bad faith or was deliberate and in contumacious disregard of the court’s authority.9 Appellate courts do not hesitate to reverse and remand for noncompliance with these requirements. Substantive misconduct is and should be subject to less tolerance before dismissal with prejudice is warranted. Lying about facts central to the case, including the nature and extent of one’s own injuries, simply cannot be tolerated and, frequently, cannot be remedied by any lesser sanction than dismissal with prejudice." Cases: administrative misconduct, judicial misconduct issues circumventing TITLE 42 SECTIONS 666 AND 654, 657 COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION CITATION FROM THE FEDERAL STATUTE OF THE US CODE § 657. Distribution of collected support 50 STATE TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT PROCESS http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/child-support-process-administrative-vs-judicial.aspx Child support orders can be established by the courts or by an administrative entity. In the administrative process, the state child support agency, also referred to as the IV-D agency, establishes the support order, usually without a hearing. In the judicial process, the court sets the order. Many states use a hybrid, or quasi-judicial process, which incorporates some judicial elements mixed with administrative processes. For example, many states may use an administrative forum, such as an attorney general’s office, but may incorporate a judicial element, such as an attorney. The three elements that determine where a process falls on the administrative/judicial continuum are 1) the forum used, 2) presiding officer, and 3) attorney involvement. The forum used simply means where the child support order is processed. Forums can include a courtroom, an administrative office of the court, the offices of an executive branch division such as the office of administrative hearings or attorney general’s office, the IV-D umbrella agency, or the IV-D agency itself. The presiding officer is the person who is in charge of supervising and running the process. Attorney involvement refers to whether or not an attorney represents the IV-D agency during the process. A state with a highly judicial process is one in which the forum used is a courtroom, the presiding officer is a judge, and the IV-D agency is represented by an attorney. States may be quasi-judicial, which means that the forum used may be a courtroom, but instead of a judge presiding, it may be a hearing officer who oversees the process. It is difficult to categorize states as fully judicial or fully administrative as the process differs depending on the type of order being processed. For example, there may be different processes for contested (challenged) and uncontested orders. Cases 2002-DR-050423-1 SHAW, SHEILA J 03/0912002 VS, COLEMAN, Family JIMMY L Income Deduction 0 Closed - Non SRS 2002-DR-006249-0 SHAW, SHEILA J 04124/2002 Paternity vs. GONZALEZ, Div 38 Closed - SRS CARLOS A Kest, Sally D M SHAW, SHEILA 08/29/2005 Paternity DOR JOCELYN VS. Div42 Re-Closed GONZALEZ, Evans, Robert M CARLOS ALBERTO SHAW, SHEILA 01/06/2010 Child Support DOR JOCELYN Div 42 Reopened Other KARENA vs. Evans, Robert M WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN SHAW, SHEILA 04112/2011 Domestic Violence w JOCELYN VS. Div 44 Closed - SRS WILLIAMS, JARRID Jordan, John E DESHAUN 2005-DR-014270-0 2010-DR-000170-0 2011-0R-006367-0 CIRCUMVENTING COMPLAINTS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND ENFORCEMENT UNDER (1) CIVIL ACTIONS BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SEC. 2000e-6. [Section 707] (a) Complaint... (2) STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CF OPERATING PROCEDURE CHILDREN AND FAMILIES NO. 180-4 TALLAHASSEE, October 29, 2007 Inspector General MANDATORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL (3) The following is an abstract from the Administration for Children and Families' website and the Administration for Child Support Enforcement, both of which publish all statutory guidelines for the collection of child support and payments thereof to the recipient. collection and distribution of child support payments Within this site it is defined as follows Frequently Asked Questions about Child Support Collection/Distribution For answers to questions about your own case, you need to check with your local or state child support office. State CSE agency telephone numbers and addresses are at (English):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ directories/ext/IVd_list.cfm (Spanish):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ directories/ext/Espanol_IVd_ list.cfm State CSE agency web site links are on our web site at the following location: http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/ programs/cse/extinf.htm#exta The following general information may be helpful: If the state collects more in a month than is to be paid to the family for their current and past due support, the rest of the money can be used to repay the state and federal governments for cash assistance * AFDC or TANF * that a family received. Also, child support agencies can recover all or part of the costs of their services from people who are not in a cash assistance program. These can include the cost of legal work done by agency attorneys or the costs of locating a parent, for example. The money may be deducted from the child support payment, or it may be collected from the noncustodial parent. For more information on changes in the law and how they may affect you, as well as the cost recovery practices of your State, you should contact your State child support enforcement agency. atty general complaint sent regarding misconduct( SAME ATTORNEY SAME FIRM WITH KNOWLEDGE OF PRIOR CASES-http://www.avvo.com/attorneys/32803-fl-ana-tangelrodriguez-1255736.html)/Duty to Report Lawyer Misconduct--Duty to Supervise--Responsibilities of Members of Law Firm Management Committees; These statutes include: Section 210401 of the Violence... Fw: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw Me to misconductcontact@floridadjqc.com & 9 moreSent Sheila Jocelyn Shaw http://professsorshaw.blogspot.com/ --- On Thu, 4/28/16, Sheila Shaw wrote: > From: Sheila Shaw > Subject: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw: prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct > To: ovw.info@usdoj.gov > Date: Thursday, April 28, 2016, 3:02 PM > --- On Thu, 4/28/16, Sheila Shaw > > wrote: > > > From: Sheila Shaw > > Subject: prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct > > To: contact@nwc.org > > Cc: "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "Misconduct president" , > "police misconduct" , > "police misconduct" , > "police misconduct" > > Date: Thursday, April 28, 2016, 2:54 PM > > > > > > VAWA REPORT REGARDING NOT ONLY ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT IN > CHILD > > CUSTODY MODIFICATION > > Intentionally omitted criminal nonsupport, offensive > > behaviour, professional misconduct and ethnic > biasedness, > > child exploitation and institutional racism > > Title 42 section 42 1983, 14141 attorney prosecutorial > child > > custody exploitation including false statements never > heard > > throughout case trial activity, false statements to > commence > > proceedings > > > > > > Case Type: > > Paternity > > Date Filed: > > 4/24/2002 > > Location: > > Div 38 > > UCN: > > 482002DR006249A001OX > > Judge: > > Patricia A Doherty > > Status: > > Closed - SRS > > Date Description Pages Doc > > Request > > Doc > > 7/10/2013 Letter 12 > > 3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address 1 > > > > > 1/1/2007 Case Reassigned to Division > > > > > 2/11/2005 Notice > > 11/10/2004 Final Order of Dismissal After > Hearing > > > > 11/10/2004 Final Order of Dismissal After > Hearing > > > > 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Smith, > Maura T > > > > 9/24/2004 Court Minutes > > 9/24/2004 Affidavit > > 9/13/2004 Pluries Summons Unserved > > > > > 7/28/2004 Pluries Summons Served > > > > > 7/27/2004 Notice of Hearing > > > 7/16/2004 Motion to Dismiss > > > 7/14/2004 Notice of Unavailability > > > > > 7/14/2004 Notice Appearance of Counsel > > > > > 7/1/2004 Affidavit of Lost/Destroyed Instrument > > > > 7/1/2004 Pluries Summons Issued > > > > > 4/16/2004 Pluries Summons Issued > > > > > 1/6/2004 Returned Mail > > 12/26/2003 Certificate of Mailing > > > > 12/26/2003 Affidavit > > 12/26/2003 Notice of Action Issued > > > > > 10/13/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved > > > > > 9/12/2003 Pluries Summons Issued > > > > > 9/3/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved > > > > 9/3/2003 Affidavit > > 9/3/2003 Motion > > 9/3/2003 Motion for Default > > > 9/3/2003 Affidavit > > 9/3/2003 Motion > > 9/3/2003 Motion for Default > > > 8/4/2003 Pluries Summons Issued > > > > > 7/31/2003 Request for Admissions > > > > > 6/9/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved > > > > 5/21/2003 Pluries Summons Issued > > > > > 5/1/2003 Third Party Summons > > > 2/11/2003 Pluries Summons Issued > > > > > 12/26/2002 Pluries Summons Served > > > > 11/8/2002 Pluries Summons Issued > > > > > 9/24/2002 Pluries Summons Unserved > > > > > 8/30/2002 Pluries Summons Issued > > > > > 7/29/2002 Summons Returned > > > 7/3/2002 Alias Summons Issued > > > 5/15/2002 Summons Returned > > > 4/24/2002 Summons Issued > > 4/24/2002 Affidavit of Non Military Service > > > > > 4/24/2002 Request for Admissions > > > > > 4/24/2002 Affidavit of Need > > > 4/24/2002 Certificate of Compliance > > > > > 4/24/2002 Financial Affidavit > > > 4/24/2002 Civil Cover Sheet > > > 4/24/2002 Petition > > 4/24/2002 Initial Judge Assigned > > > > Case Type: > > Paternity DOR > > Date Filed: > > 8/29/2005 > > Location: > > Div 42 > > UCN: > > 482005DR014270A001OX > > Judge: > > Heather P Rodriguez > > Status: > > Re-Closed > > Citation Number: > > Date Description Pages Doc > > Request > > Doc > > 3/3/2016 Returned Mail 3 > > 2/11/2016 Order Denying 2 > > 2/11/2016 Order Denying 2 > > 4/14/2015 Motion to Vacate 10 > > > 4/14/2015 Notice 3 > > 7/3/2013 Letter 5 > > 3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address 1 > > > > > 8/7/2012 Letter 11 > > 5/15/2012 Order Denying 1 > > 5/7/2012 Birth Certificate 1 > > > 5/7/2012 Motion 107 > > 5/7/2012 Civil Cover Sheet 2 > > > 4/2/2012 Notice of Change of Address 1 > > > > > 4/2/2012 Motion 74 > > 12/5/2011 Letter 3 > > 11/14/2011 Notice of Change of Address 1 > > > > 9/19/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & > Order > > 2 > > 9/14/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 > > > > 9/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 > > > > 9/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 > > > > 4/6/2011 Returned Mail 2 > > 3/30/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & > Order > > 3 > > 3/28/2011 Child Support Information Sheet > 1 > > > > 3/28/2011 Certified Notice of Delinquent > Support > > 1 > > 3/28/2011 Notice to Depository 1 > > > > > 3/28/2011 Supplemental Financial Statement > 1 > > > > 3/28/2011 Court Minutes 1 > > 3/28/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George > > > > > 3/22/2011 Returned Mail 2 > > 3/11/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment 1 > > > > 2/24/2011 Notice of Change of Address 1 > > > > > 2/24/2011 Memorandum 7 > > 2/24/2011 Copy/Copies 6 > > 2/23/2011 Answer 6 > > 2/18/2011 Alias Summons Returned Served > 5 > > > > 2/17/2011 Final Order 1 > > 2/14/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George > > > > > 1/14/2011 Returned Mail 2 > > 1/4/2011 Notice of Hearing 1 > > > 1/4/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment 1 > > > > > 11/29/2010 Notice of Change of Address 1 > > > > 10/22/2010 Order for Income Deduction 1 > > > > > 10/22/2010 Report/Recommendation and Final > Judgment > > 4 > > 10/19/2010 Court Minutes 1 > > > 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) 2 > > 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) 2 > > 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet > 2 > > > > 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet > 1 > > > > 10/19/2010 HEARING - Petition/Motion > > > > > 10/8/2010 Returned Mail 2 > > 9/20/2010 Order for Non Jury Trial 1 > > > > > 9/17/2010 Notice for Trial 1 > > > 8/12/2010 Response 2 > > 6/14/2010 Alias Summons Issued 4 > > > > > 4/9/2010 Summons Returned Unserved 5 > > > > > 12/17/2009 Summons Issued 4 > > > 12/17/2009 Certificate of Compliance 2 > > > > > 12/17/2009 Financial Affidavit 4 > > > > > 12/17/2009 Petition 4 > > 12/17/2009 Request for Admissions 1 > > > > > 11/1/2006 Notice of Change of Address > > > > > 9/28/2006 HRS673 to Bureau > > > 7/19/2006 Letter > > 7/19/2006 Letter > > 5/9/2006 Final Judgment > > 5/9/2006 Order for Income Deduction > > > > > 5/9/2006 Disposed by Non-Jury Trial > > > > > 5/9/2006 Final Judgment > > 5/8/2006 HRS673 to Bureau > > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, > Renee A > > > > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, > Renee A > > > > 4/28/2006 Affidavit > > 4/28/2006 Affidavit > > 4/28/2006 Court Minutes > > 3/29/2006 Order for Non Jury Trial > > > > > 3/29/2006 Notice of Hearing > > > 3/29/2006 Notice for Trial > > > 3/29/2006 Request to Produce > > > 3/28/2006 Request for Admissions > > > > > 3/28/2006 Notice of Filing HLA Tissue Typing > > > > > 2/9/2006 Notice > > 1/10/2006 HRS673 to Bureau > > > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, Renee > A > > > > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee > A > > > > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 1/5/2006 Court Minutes > > 1/5/2006 Financial Affidavit > > > 1/5/2006 Child Support Information Sheet > > > > 1/5/2006 Child Support Information Sheet > > > > 12/6/2005 Notice of Hearing > > > 12/6/2005 Order for Non Jury Trial > > > > > 12/6/2005 Request to Produce > > > 12/6/2005 Notice for Trial > > > 12/5/2005 Answer > > 10/31/2005 Summons Returned > > > 10/31/2005 Summons Returned > > > 10/27/2005 Answer Denying Allegations > > > > > 8/29/2005 Summons Issued > > 8/29/2005 Request for Admissions > > > > > 8/29/2005 Certificate of Compliance > > > > > 8/29/2005 Financial Affidavit > > > 8/29/2005 Notice of Social Security > > > > > 8/29/2005 Civil Cover Sheet > > > 8/29/2005 Petition > > 8/29/2005 Initial Judge Assigned > > > > > > > > > VOR (Viewable on Request) > > Certain case documents contain sensitive or personally > > identifiable information that must be manually > redacted > > before they are viewable by the general public. > Documents > > listed in the Docket Events section as VOR are public > > documents that require further redaction by Clerk > staff > > before they can be viewed. Follow the steps below to > request > > access to these documents: > > > > Check the Request Doc checkbox for the document > you > > wish to view. You may repeat this for other VOR > documents on > > the same case. > > Once all document requests have been made for > this > > case, click the Submit button. A confirmation screen > will > > display, where you will be asked to enter or confirm > your > > email address to finalize your request. > > You will receive an initial email notification > to > > confirm your request, followed by additional email > > notifications as requested documents become available. > The > > Clerk’s office makes every effort to complete these > > requests in a timely manner. > > > > For definitions of document types, please refer to our > > glossary. > > Hearings > > Date Hearing Time Location > Pages > > Doc > > 3/28/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 > AM > > > > 2/14/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 > AM > > > > 10/19/2010 Petition/Motion 1:00 PM > > > > > 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 8:00 AM > > 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 8:00 AM > > 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 8:00 AM > > 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A > 8:00 > > AM > > 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 8:00 AM > > 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 8:00 AM > > 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 8:00 AM > > 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A > 8:00 > > AM > > 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A > 9:00 > > AM > > 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 9:00 AM > > 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 9:00 AM > > 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 9:00 AM > > 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A > 9:00 > > AM > > 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 9:00 AM > > 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 9:00 AM > > 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 9:00 AM > > > > > > > > Case Narrative > > > > "an act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere > with > > the orderly administration of justice, or to impair > the > > dignity of the court or respect for its authority. > There are > > two kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, > 128. > > direct contempt openly and in the presence of the > court, > > resists the power of the court, 102 A. 400, 406; and > > consequential, or constructive contempt results from > matters > > outside the court, such as failure to comply... MISUSE > OF > > OFFICE TO ENGAGE IN RACIAL PROFILING, FRAUD, AIDING > AND > > ABETTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT RECOVERY BY FALSE > ALLEGATIONS > > USED TO ABATE DEPARTMENTAL COLLECTION INTERVENTIONS ON > > BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT AND MOTHER TO CASES IN THE > FAMILY > > COURT, AND CHILD SUPPORT OCSE, AFFILIATED WITH FLORIDA > DCF > > DEPARTMENTAL RISS SYSTEM DATABASES ON FEBRUARY 4TH, > 2011 > > DURING WHICH TIME COURT DATES OR CONCURRENT > ENFORCEMENT > > ACTION WAS BEING UNDERGONE. CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. > 180-4 > > MANDATORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF > INSPECTOR > > GENERA #Employee Misconduct > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/03/7750844white-collar-crime-victim.html, > > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/12/you-cannot-use-information-available-to.html > > OIG Investigative and Law Enforcement Authority The > > Office of Inspector General (OIG), U.S. Department of > > Agriculture (USDA), was administratively established by > the > > Secretary of Agriculture in 1962 following a major > criminal > > fraud scandal affecting several agencies within USDA. > OIG > > was later legislatively established by Congress under > the > > Inspector General Act of 1978 (Public Law [P.L.] > 95-452), as > > amended. Pursuant to the Inspector General Act of 1978 > and > > Section 1337 of the Agriculture and Food Act of 1981 > (P.L. > > 97-98), OIG Investigations is the law enforcement arm > of the > > Department, with Department-wide investigative > jurisdiction. > > OIG Special Agents conduct investigations of > significant > > criminal activities involving USDA programs, > operations, and > > personnel, and are authorized to make arrests, execute > > warrants, and carry firearms. The types of > investigations > > conducted by OIG Special Agents involve criminal > activities > > such as frauds in subsidy, price support, benefits, > and > > insurance programs; significant thefts of Government > > property or funds; bribery; extortion; smuggling; and > > assaults on employees. Investigations involving > criminal > > activity that affects the health and safety of the > public, > > such as meat packers who knowingly sell hazardous food > > products and individuals who tamper with food regulated > by > > USDA, are also high-profile investigative priorities. > In > > addition, OIG Special Agents are poised to provide > emergency > > law enforcement response to USDA declared emergencies > and > > suspected incidents of terrorism affecting USDA > regulated > > industries, as well as USDA programs, operations, > personnel, > > and installations, in coordination with Federal, State, > and > > local law enforcement agencies, as appropriate. The > > enactment of the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food > and > > Drug Administration, and Related Agencies > Appropriations Act > > of 1996 (P.L. 104-37) authorized OIG to receive funds > and > > property through criminal and civil Federal forfeiture > > proceedings, and through equitable sharing of > forfeited > > funds and property controlled by the U.S. Department > of > > Justice. Forfeiture proceeds have severe restrictions > > mandated by statutes and U.S. Department of Justice > policy > > as to how they are used. Forfeiture funds cannot be > used in > > lieu of the OIG's regular appropriations. False CPI, > > PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida > > Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do > > concerning false reporting for children and Section > 415.111, > > F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. RE: CF > > OPERATING PROCEDURE (NO. 180-4 https://drive.google.com/folder/d/0B84_tgjFbXNLcUpfaDBSRHBSZDQ/editATORY > > REPORTING REQUIiREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR > > GENERAL Clearly outlines employee fraud and misconduct > > within the scope of cause f action by the Office of > the > > Inspector General within the Florida Departmentof > Children. > > § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE > AND > > FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 > 787.03 > > False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. > § > > 775.085) (complaint ACAP THE FLORIDA BAR INQUIRY > COMPLAINT > > FORM http://goo.gl/h9wjQr) http://www.dcf.state.fl.us/admin/ig/content/AR2013-14.pdf > > Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what > the > > department has to do concerning false reporting for > children > > and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses wdith false > reporting > > for adults. https://oig.justice.gov/hotline/contact-doj.htm cc: > > letter to OIG FL DCF Keith Parks Resending Complaint > > Attached Department form (complaint ACAP THE FLORIDA > BAR > > INQUIRY COMPLAINT FORM Fw: ATTN KEITH PARKS CONTINUING > > INSPECTOR GENERAL MANDATORY REPORTING TO IG OFFICE, > > MISCONDUCT COMPLAINT Aug 10, 2015, 12:19 PM § > 112.313(8), > > Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW > 2003 > > FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 False complaint > Fwd: > > ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § 775.085 Enhances > penalty > > for crimes evidencing "prejudice based on the race, > color, > > ancestry, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, > national > > origin, mental or physical disability, or advanced age > of > > the victim. The duty to report misconduct is one of > the > > ethical duties imposed on attorneys in the United > States by > > the rules governing professional responsibility http://www.iape.org/index.php http://definitions.uslegal. > com/w/willful-professional- > > misconduct/ Rule 8.3—Reporting Professional > Misconduct (a) > > A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a > > violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that > raises a > > substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, > > trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other > respects, > > shall inform the appropriate professional authority. > (b) A > > lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation > of > > applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a > > substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for > office > > shall inform the appropriate authority. (c) This rule > does > > not require disclosure of information otherwise > protected by > > Rule 1.6 or other law TITLE 42 SECTIONS 666 AND 654, > 657 > > COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION CITATION FROM THE FEDERAL > > STATUTE OF THE US CODE § 657. Distribution of > collected > > support 50 STATE T Me to infopitt@womenslawproject.org & 1 moreSent --- On Thu, 4/28/16, Sheila Shaw wrote: > From: Sheila Shaw > Subject: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw: prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct > To: local@tampabay.com > Date: Thursday, April 28, 2016, 3:26 PM > > > > VAWA REPORT REGARDING NOT ONLY ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT IN CHILD > CUSTODY MODIFICATION > Intentionally omitted criminal nonsupport, offensive > behaviour, professional misconduct and ethnic biasedness, > child exploitation and institutional racism > Title 42 section 42 1983, 14141 attorney prosecutorial child > chustody exploitation including false statements never heard > throughout case trial activity, false statements to commence > proceedings > > > Case Type: > Paternity > Date Filed: > 4/24/2002 > Location: > Div 38 > UCN: > 482002DR006249A001OX > Judge: > Patricia A Doherty > Status: > Closed - SRS > Date Description Pages Doc Request > Doc > 7/10/2013 Letter 12 > 3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address > 1 > 1/1/2007 Case Reassigned to Division > 2/11/2005 Notice > 11/10/2004 Final Order of Dismissal After > Hearing > 11/10/2004 Final Order of Dismissal After > Hearing > 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Smith, Maura > T > 9/24/2004 Court Minutes > 9/24/2004 Affidavit > 9/13/2004 Pluries Summons Unserved > 7/28/2004 Pluries Summons Served > 7/27/2004 Notice of Hearing > 7/16/2004 Motion to Dismiss > 7/14/2004 Notice of Unavailability > 7/14/2004 Notice Appearance of Counsel > 7/1/2004 Affidavit of Lost/Destroyed Instrument > > 7/1/2004 Pluries Summons Issued > 4/16/2004 Pluries Summons Issued > 1/6/2004 Returned Mail > 12/26/2003 Certificate of Mailing > 12/26/2003 Affidavit > 12/26/2003 Notice of Action Issued > 10/13/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved > 9/12/2003 Pluries Summons Issued > 9/3/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved > 9/3/2003 Affidavit > 9/3/2003 Motion > 9/3/2003 Motion for Default > 9/3/2003 Affidavit > 9/3/2003 Motion > 9/3/2003 Motion for Default > 8/4/2003 Pluries Summons Issued > 7/31/2003 Request for Admissions > 6/9/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved > 5/21/2003 Pluries Summons Issued > 5/1/2003 Third Party Summons > 2/11/2003 Pluries Summons Issued > 12/26/2002 Pluries Summons Served > 11/8/2002 Pluries Summons Issued > 9/24/2002 Pluries Summons Unserved > 8/30/2002 Pluries Summons Issued > 7/29/2002 Summons Returned > 7/3/2002 Alias Summons Issued > 5/15/2002 Summons Returned > 4/24/2002 Summons Issued > 4/24/2002 Affidavit of Non Military Service > > 4/24/2002 Request for Admissions > 4/24/2002 Affidavit of Need > 4/24/2002 Certificate of Compliance > 4/24/2002 Financial Affidavit > 4/24/2002 Civil Cover Sheet > 4/24/2002 Petition > 4/24/2002 Initial Judge Assigned > > Case Type: > Paternity DOR > Date Filed: > 8/29/2005 > Location: > Div 42 > UCN: > 482005DR014270A001OX > Judge: > Heather P Rodriguez > Status: > Re-Closed > Citation Number: > Date Description Pages Doc Request > Doc > 3/3/2016 Returned Mail 3 > 2/11/2016 Order Denying 2 > 2/11/2016 Order Denying 2 > 4/14/2015 Motion to Vacate 10 > 4/14/2015 Notice 3 > 7/3/2013 Letter 5 > 3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address > 1 > 8/7/2012 Letter 11 > 5/15/2012 Order Denying 1 > 5/7/2012 Birth Certificate 1 > 5/7/2012 Motion 107 > 5/7/2012 Civil Cover Sheet 2 > 4/2/2012 Notice of Change of Address > 1 > 4/2/2012 Motion 74 > 12/5/2011 Letter 3 > 11/14/2011 Notice of Change of Address > 1 > 9/19/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & > Order 2 > 9/14/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus > 9 > 9/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus > 9 > 9/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus > 9 > 4/6/2011 Returned Mail 2 > 3/30/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & > Order 3 > 3/28/2011 Child Support Information Sheet > 1 > 3/28/2011 Certified Notice of Delinquent Support > 1 > 3/28/2011 Notice to Depository > 1 > 3/28/2011 Supplemental Financial Statement > 1 > 3/28/2011 Court Minutes 1 > 3/28/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George > > 3/22/2011 Returned Mail 2 > 3/11/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment > 1 > 2/24/2011 Notice of Change of Address > 1 > 2/24/2011 Memorandum 7 > 2/24/2011 Copy/Copies 6 > 2/23/2011 Answer 6 > 2/18/2011 Alias Summons Returned Served > 5 > 2/17/2011 Final Order 1 > 2/14/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George > > 1/14/2011 Returned Mail 2 > 1/4/2011 Notice of Hearing 1 > 1/4/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment > 1 > 11/29/2010 Notice of Change of Address > 1 > 10/22/2010 Order for Income Deduction > 1 > 10/22/2010 Report/Recommendation and Final > Judgment 4 > 10/19/2010 Court Minutes 1 > 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) 2 > 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) 2 > 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet > 2 > 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet > 1 > 10/19/2010 HEARING - Petition/Motion > 10/8/2010 Returned Mail 2 > 9/20/2010 Order for Non Jury Trial > 1 > 9/17/2010 Notice for Trial 1 > 8/12/2010 Response 2 > 6/14/2010 Alias Summons Issued > 4 > 4/9/2010 Summons Returned Unserved > 5 > 12/17/2009 Summons Issued 4 > 12/17/2009 Certificate of Compliance > 2 > 12/17/2009 Financial Affidavit > 4 > 12/17/2009 Petition 4 > 12/17/2009 Request for Admissions > 1 > 11/1/2006 Notice of Change of Address > 9/28/2006 HRS673 to Bureau > 7/19/2006 Letter > 7/19/2006 Letter > 5/9/2006 Final Judgment > 5/9/2006 Order for Income Deduction > 5/9/2006 Disposed by Non-Jury Trial > 5/9/2006 Final Judgment > 5/8/2006 HRS673 to Bureau > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee > A > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, Renee > A > 4/28/2006 Affidavit > 4/28/2006 Affidavit > 4/28/2006 Court Minutes > 3/29/2006 Order for Non Jury Trial > 3/29/2006 Notice of Hearing > 3/29/2006 Notice for Trial > 3/29/2006 Request to Produce > 3/28/2006 Request for Admissions > 3/28/2006 Notice of Filing HLA Tissue Typing > > 2/9/2006 Notice > 1/10/2006 HRS673 to Bureau > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, Renee > A > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee > A > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 1/5/2006 Court Minutes > 1/5/2006 Financial Affidavit > 1/5/2006 Child Support Information Sheet > > 1/5/2006 Child Support Information Sheet > > 12/6/2005 Notice of Hearing > 12/6/2005 Order for Non Jury Trial > 12/6/2005 Request to Produce > 12/6/2005 Notice for Trial > 12/5/2005 Answer > 10/31/2005 Summons Returned > 10/31/2005 Summons Returned > 10/27/2005 Answer Denying Allegations > 8/29/2005 Summons Issued > 8/29/2005 Request for Admissions > 8/29/2005 Certificate of Compliance > 8/29/2005 Financial Affidavit > 8/29/2005 Notice of Social Security > 8/29/2005 Civil Cover Sheet > 8/29/2005 Petition > 8/29/2005 Initial Judge Assigned > > > VOR (Viewable on Request) > Certain case documents contain sensitive or personally > identifiable information that must be manually redacted > before they are viewable by the general public. Documents > listed in the Docket Events section as VOR are public > documents that require further redaction by Clerk staff > before they can be viewed. Follow the steps below to request > access to these documents: > > Check the Request Doc checkbox for the > document you wish to view. You may repeat this for other VOR > documents on the same case. > Once all document requests have been made for > this case, click the Submit button. A confirmation screen > will display, where you will be asked to enter or confirm > your email address to finalize your request. > You will receive an initial email notification > to confirm your request, followed by additional email > notifications as requested documents become available. The > Clerk’s office makes every effort to complete these > requests in a timely manner. > > For definitions of document types, please refer to our > glossary. > Hearings > Date Hearing Time Location > Pages Doc > 3/28/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 AM > > 2/14/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 AM > > 10/19/2010 Petition/Motion 1:00 PM > > 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated 8:00 AM > 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated 8:00 AM > 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated 8:00 AM > 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 8:00 > AM > 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated 8:00 AM > 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated 8:00 AM > 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated 8:00 AM > 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 8:00 > AM > 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 9:00 > AM > 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated 9:00 AM > 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated 9:00 AM > 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated 9:00 AM > 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 9:00 > AM > 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated 9:00 AM > 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated 9:00 AM > 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated 9:00 AM > > > Cause of Action > > Fraud > Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141: makes it unlawful for state > or local law enforcement agencies to allow officers to > engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives > persons of rights protected by the Constitution or laws of > the United States. This law is commonly referred to as the > Police Misconduct Statute. > > > the exintimate partner and public officer employee > misconduct > BUSINESS TORT RELATED-ADVERSARIAL TORTS OR MATERNAL INJURIES > WITH INTENT > > > > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer_29.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/any-police-department-receiving-federal.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/family-violence-prevention-act-victim.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/false-cpi-personal-torts-tort-of-fraud.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/jarrid-williams-probation-dc-346801.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/201 > Federal laws > Federal law 42 U.S.C. § 5772 & 42 U.S.C. § 5780 > Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5772) defines a "missing child" as > "any individual less than 18 years of age whose whereabouts > are unknown to such individual"s legal custodian." > RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 > False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, > Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do > concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, > F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. > > > 827.03 Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; > penalties.— > > intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result > in physical or mental injury to > a child; or > (c) Active encouragement of any person to commit an act that > results or could reasonably be > expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child. > A person who knowingly or willfully abuses a child without > causing great bodily harm, > > > > http://definitions.uslegal/ com/w/willful-professional- > misconduct > > > > PRINCIPAL CASES - HOME STATE ORIGIN INDIANA > > REGISTER OF ACTIONS CASE NO. 1993-CF-008458-AO cases: > OC9901243 PA cases OC9901243 and 02-83719047104532 PA Cause > number 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL Narrative > > "an act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere with > the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the > dignity of the court or respect for its authority. There are > two kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, 128. > direct contempt openly and in the presence of the court, > resists the power of the court, 102 A. 400, 406; and > consequential, or constructive contempt results from matters > outside the court, such as failure to comply... MISUSE OF > OFFICE TO ENGAGE IN RACIAL PROFILING, FRAUD, AIDING AND > ABETTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT RECOVERY BY FALSE ALLEGATIONS > USED TO ABATE DEPARTMENTAL COLLECTION INTERVENTIONS ON > BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT AND MOTHER TO CASES IN THE FAMILY > COURT, AND CHILD SUPPORT OCSE, AFFILIATED WITH FLORIDA DCF > DEPARTMENTAL RISS SYSTEM DATABASES ON FEBRUARY 4TH, 2011 > DURING WHICH TIME COURT DATES OR CONCURRENT ENFORCEMENT > ACTION WAS BEING UNDERGONE. CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 > MANDATORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR > GENERA #Employee Misconduct http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/03/7750844white-collar-crime-victim.html, > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/12/you-cannot-use-information-available-to.html > OIG Investigative and Law Enforcement Authority The > Office of Inspector General (OIG), U.S. Department of > Agriculture (USDA), was administratively established by the > Secretary of Agriculture in 1962 following a major criminal > fraud scandal affecting several agencies within USDA. OIG > was later legislatively established by Congress under the > Inspector General Act of 1978 (Public Law [P.L.] 95-452), as > amended. Pursuant to the Inspector General Act of 1978 and > Section 1337 of the Agriculture and Food Act of 1981 (P.L. > 97-98), OIG Investigations is the law enforcement arm of the > Department, with Department-wide investigative jurisdiction. > OIG Special Agents conduct investigations of significant > criminal activities involving USDA programs, operations, and > personnel, and are authorized to make arrests, execute > warrants, and carry firearms. The types of investigations > conducted by OIG Special Agents involve criminal activities > such as frauds in subsidy, price support, benefits, and > insurance programs; significant thefts of Government > property or funds; bribery; extortion; smuggling; and > assaults on employees. Investigations involving criminal > activity that affects the health and safety of the public, > such as meat packers who knowingly sell hazardous food > products and individuals who tamper with food regulated by > USDA, are also high-profile investigative priorities. In > addition, OIG Special Agents are poised to provide emergency > law enforcement response to USDA declared emergencies and > suspected incidents of terrorism affecting USDA regulated > industries, as well as USDA programs, operations, personnel, > and installations, in coordination with Federal, State, and > local law enforcement agencies, as appropriate. The > enactment of the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and > Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act > of 1996 (P.L. 104-37) authorized OIG to receive funds and > property through criminal and civil Federal forfeiture > proceedings, and through equitable sharing of forfeited > funds and property controlled by the U.S. Department of > Justice. Forfeiture proceeds have severe restrictions > mandated by statutes and U.S. Department of Justice policy > as to how they are used. Forfeiture funds cannot be used in > lieu of the OIG's regular appropriations. False CPI, > PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida > Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do > concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, > F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. RE: CF > OPERATING PROCEDURE (NO. 180-4 https://drive.google.com/folder/d/0B84_tgjFbXNLcUpfaDBSRHBSZDQ/editATORY > REPORTING REQUIiREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR > GENERAL Clearly outlines employee fraud and misconduct > within the scope of cause f action by the Office of the > Inspector General within the Florida Departmentof Children. > § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND > FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 > False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § > 775.085) (complaint ACAP THE FLORIDA BAR INQUIRY COMPLAINT > FORM http://goo.gl/h9wjQr) http://www.dcf.state.fl.us/admin/ig/content/AR2013-14.pdf > Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the > department has to do concerning false reporting for children > and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses wdith false reporting > for adults. https://oig.justice.gov/hotline/contact-doj.htm cc: > letter to OIG FL DCF Keith Parks Resending Complaint > Attached Department form (complaint ACAP THE FLORIDA BAR > INQUIRY COMPLAINT FORM Fw: ATTN KEITH PARKS CONTINUING > INSPECTOR GENERAL MANDATORY REPORTING TO IG OFFICE, > MISCONDUCT COMPLAINT Aug 10, 2015, 12:19 PM § 112.313(8), > Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW 2003 > FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 False complaint Fwd: > ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § 775.085 Enhances penalty > for crimes evidencing "prejudice based on the race, color, > ancestry, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, national > origin, mental or physical disability, or advanced age of > the victim. The duty to report misconduct is one of the > ethical duties imposed on attorneys in the United States by > the rules governing professional responsibility http://www.iape.org/index.php http://definitions.uslegal. com/w/willful-professional- > misconduct/ Rule 8.3—Reporting Professional Misconduct (a) > A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a > violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a > substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, > trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, > shall inform the appropriate professional authority. (b) A > lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation of > applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a > substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for office > shall inform the appropriate authority. (c) This rule does > not require disclosure of information otherwise protected by > Rule 1.6 or other law TITLE 42 SECTIONS 666 AND 654, 657 > COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION CITATION FROM THE FEDERAL > STATUTE OF THE US CODE § 657. Distribution of collected > support 50 STATE TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT PROCESS http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/child-support-process-administrative-vs-judicial.aspx > Child support orders can be established by the courts or > by an administrative entity. Statutes Pertaining to > Violations of Civil Rights Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Every > person who, under color or any statute, ordinance, > regulation, custom or usage, of any State of Territory, > subjects ... any citizen of the United States ... to the > deprivation of any rights, privileges or immunities secured > by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party > injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper > proceeding for redress. Felony to Interfere With Civil > Rights Title 42 U.S.C § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with > civil rights (1) Preventing officer from performing duty. If > two or more persons ... conspire to prevent ... any person > from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of > confidence under the United States, or from discharging any > duties thereof; or to injure him in his person or property > on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his > office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or > to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, > or impede him in the discharge of his official duties. (2) > Obstructing justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror. > If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to > deter, by force, intimidation, or threat, any party or > witness in any court of the United States from attending > such court, or from testifying to any matter pending > therein, freely, fully, and truthfully, or to injure such > party or witness in his person or property on account of his > having so attended or testified, or to influence the > verdict, presentment, or indictment of any grand or petit > juror in any such court, or to injure such juror in his > person or property on account of any verdict, presentment, > or indictment lawfully assented to by him, or of his being > or having been such juror; or if two or more persons > conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, > obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of > justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to > any citizen the equal protection of the law, or to injure > him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to > enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to > the equal protection of the laws; (3) Depriving persons of > rights or privileges. If two or more persons in any State or > Territory conspire, or go in disguise on the highway or on > the premises of another, for the purpose of depriving, > either directly or indirectly, any person or class of > persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal > privileges and immunities under the laws, or for the purpose > of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of > any State or Territory from giving or securing to all > persons within such State or Territory the equal protection > of the laws; ... or to injure any citizen in person or > property on account of such support or advocacy; in any case > of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more > persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in > furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby > another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of > having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of > the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have > an action for the recovery of damages, occasioned by such > injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the > conspirators. Title 42 U.S.C. § 1985 pertains to a > conspiracy to interfere with civil rights, (1) to prevent an > officer from performing a duty; (2) obstructing justice; > intimidating party, witness, or juror; (3) or depriving > persons of rights or privileges. Title 42 U.S.C. § 1986. > Action for neglect to prevent conspiracy Every person who, > having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be > done, and mentioned in the preceding section [42 USCS § > 1985], are about to be committed, and having power to > prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, > neglects or refuses to do so, if such wrongful act be > committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his > legal representatives, for all damages caused by such > wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence > could have prevented; And such damages may be recovered in > an action on the case; and any number of persons guilty of > such wrongful neglect or refusal may be joined as defendants > in the action, and if the death of any party be caused by > any such wrongful act and neglect, the legal representatives > of the deceased shall have such action therefore, and may > recover not exceeding five thousand dollars damages therein, > for the benefit of the widow of the deceased, if there be > one, and if there be no widow, then for the benefit of the > next of kin of the deceased. But no action under the > provisions of this section shall be sustained which is not > commenced within one year after the cause of action has > accrued. Keith Parks, Inspector General 1317 Winewood Blvd., > Bldg. 5, Second Floor Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700 Phone: > (850) 488-1225 Fax: (850) 488-1428 Maxine McGregor Client > Relations Coordinator Email: Maxine_McGregor@dcf.state.fl.us > Address: 400 West Robinson Street Hurston Bldg., South > Tower, S S-1106 Orlando Florida 32801 United States Phone > Number: 407-317-7000 x7047 ACCESS Florida Gretchen Perry > Client Relations Coordinator Address: 400 West Robinson > Street Hurston Bldg., South Tower, S S-1106 Orlando Florida > 32801 United States Phone Number: 407-317-7000 x7045 1) CPS > may only place founded reports on the state's central > registry of child abuse and neglect. (In some states, > unfounded reports are placed on the central registry, which > not only causes harm to innocent people but is also a > violation of due process.) 2) Caseworkers must inform > families if a report is anonymous. (There is a difference > between anonymous and confidential—reporters’ names > should be kept confidential, but anonymous reports are not > as reliable as those made by known reporters.) 3) Parents > must be allowed to select an unrelated adult to be present > during interviews of their children. 4) Investigations must > cease immediately upon discovery that the allegations are > false. Continuing the investigation process despite proof of > innocence only traumatizes the family and wastes state > resources. 5) Parents must have access to the records of > their investigations. HSLDA also continues to assist with > incorporating the following two federal CAPTA requirements > into state codes: 1) Requiring child protective services > workers to be trained in their duty to protect the statutory > and constitutional rights of those they are investigating. > 2) Requiring child protective services personnel to advise > individuals subject to a child abuse and neglect > investigation of the complaint or allegation made against > them. Notes 1. Children’s Bureau. (2003). Child > Maltreatment. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. > Retrieved > fromhttp://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm03/index.htm. > 2. Calabretta v. Floyd, 189 F.3d 808 (1999). Claudia > Hernandez 400 W. Robinson St. (Hurston South Tower) Ste. # > S-509, Orlando, FL 32801-1718 WHITE COLLAR CRIMES ABUSE OF > PROCESS PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT LAWYER MISCONDUCT JUDICIAL > MISCONDUCT Saturday, 12 December 2015 You cannot use > information available to you because of your job, but not > available to the public, for your personal benefit or for > the benefit of others. § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF > OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes > chapter 787 787.03 False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT > (Fla. Stat. § 775.085 Enhances penalty for crimes > evidencing "prejudice based on the race, color, ancestry, > ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, > mental or physical disability, or advanced age of the > victim. The duty to report misconduct is one of the ethical > duties imposed on attorneys in the United States by the > rules governing professional responsibility http://www.iape.org/index.php http://definitions.uslegal. com/w/willful-professional- > misconduct/ Rule 8.3—Reporting Professional Misconduct (a) > A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a > violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a > substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, > trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, > shall inform the appropriate professional authority. (b) A > lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation of > applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a > substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for office > shall inform the appropriate authority. (c) This rule does > not require disclosure of information otherwise protected by > Rule 1.6 or other law. http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309048893 Cases > 2005-DR-014270-O (Paternity) P I I Lead Attorneys Petitioner > SHAW, SHEILA J BARBARA FANCHER(LIMITED) JONES, Esquire > Retained 407-849-1133(W) Respondent GONZALEZ, CARLOS A > RUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire Retained 407-786-2889(W) > E & O C & O C DISPOSITIONS 11/10/ Final Order of > Dismissal After Hearing 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal > After Hearing 2004 OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS 01/01/ Case > Reassigned to Division 2007 Case Reassigned to Division|CASE > REASSIGNED TO JUDGE 38 02/11/ Notice 2005 Notice|NOTICE OF > CONCLUSION OF REPRESENTATION 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal > After Hearing 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing > 2004 Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing|FINAL ORDER OF > DISMISSAL AFTER HEARING RECORDED RELATED CASES - PRINCIPAL > JUDICIAL OR PROFESSION MISCONDUCT-FRAUD ON THE COURTS- > PERSONAL AND BUSINESS TORT RELATED-ADVERSARIAL TORTS OR > MATERNAL INJURIES WITH INTENT http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer_29.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/any-police-department-receiving-federal.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/family-violence-prevention-act-victim.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/false-cpi-personal-torts-tort-of-fraud.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/jarrid-williams-probation-dc-346801.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/201 > Federal laws Federal law 42 U.S.C. § 5772 & 42 > U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5772) defines a > "missing child" as "any individual less than 18 years of age > whose whereabouts are unknown to such individual"s legal > custodian." RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI, > PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida > Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do > concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, > F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. 827.03 > Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; > penalties.— intentional act that could reasonably be > expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child; > or (c) Active encouragement of any person to commit an act > that results or could reasonably be expected to result in > physical or mental injury to a child. A person who knowingly > or willfully abuses a child without causing great bodily > harm, http://definitions.uslegal. com/w/willful-professional- > misconduct PRINCIPAL CASES - HOME STATE ORIGIN INDIANA > REGISTER OF ACTIONS CASE NO. 1993-CF-008458-AO cases: > OC9901243 PA cases OC9901243 and 02-83719047104532 PA Cause > number 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL 2010-DP 1170 FL > INDIANA CASE NUMBERS Paternity case file no J18720 filed > 11-16-71/11-24-71 order date Shirley Ann Shaw/Claude R. > Jackson mariired December 31st, 1978 marriage license number > CDR-94-114 Shirley Ann Shaw Joseph Nikolaenko marriage ended > June 30, 1995 Buddmeeks Ctr Domestic case DCM-91-6993 1991 > marriage license number 02D01-9707-ML-001399 07/08/97 > married on 07/26/1997 DOB 04/21/46 Joseph Nikolaenko mother > Michlaina Nikolaenko 5012 Pacer Run Ft. Wayne, IN Gwedolyn > Ann Brown DOB 04/12/60 son Tyrese Dartanvan Brown father > Thomas Lewis Brown mother Mary Lee Spann 3054 Schele Ave Ft. > Wayne, IN Dorothy Jackson Claude Jackson married July 2, > 1983 Divorce petition 02C01-9110-D1-1313 CDR-91-1313 > "...Additionally, whether substantive or procedural > misconduct is the basis for the sanction, the trial court > must hold an evidentiary hearing before dismissing a case > with prejudice,8 and must make an express finding that the > conduct forming the basis for the dismissal was willful or > done in bad faith or was deliberate and in contumacious > disregard of the court’s authority.9 Appellate courts do > not hesitate to reverse and remand for noncompliance with > these requirements. Substantive misconduct is and should be > subject to less tolerance before dismissal with prejudice is > warranted. Lying about facts central to the case, including > the nature and extent of one’s own injuries, simply cannot > be tolerated and, frequently, cannot be remedied by any > lesser sanction than dismissal with prejudice." Cases: > administrative misconduct, judicial misconduct issues > circumventing TITLE 42 SECTIONS 666 AND 654, 657 COLLECTION > AND DISTRIBUTION CITATION FROM THE FEDERAL STATUTE OF THE US > CODE § 657. Distribution of collected support 50 STATE > TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT PROCESS http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/child-support-process-administrative-vs-judicial.aspx > Child support orders can be established by the courts or > by an administrative entity. In the administrative process, > the state child support agency, also referred to as the IV-D > agency, establishes the support order, usually without a > hearing. In the judicial process, the court sets the order. > Many states use a hybrid, or quasi-judicial process, which > incorporates some judicial elements mixed with > administrative processes. For example, many states may use > an administrative forum, such as an attorney general’s > office, but may incorporate a judicial element, such as an > attorney. The three elements that determine where a process > falls on the administrative/judicial continuum are 1) the > forum used, 2) presiding officer, and 3) attorney > involvement. The forum used simply means where the child > support order is processed. Forums can include a courtroom, > an administrative office of the court, the offices of an > executive branch division such as the office of > administrative hearings or attorney general’s office, the > IV-D umbrella agency, or the IV-D agency itself. The > presiding officer is the person who is in charge of > supervising and running the process. Attorney involvement > refers to whether or not an attorney represents the IV-D > agency during the process. A state with a highly judicial > process is one in which the forum used is a courtroom, the > presiding officer is a judge, and the IV-D agency is > represented by an attorney. States may be quasi-judicial, > which means that the forum used may be a courtroom, but > instead of a judge presiding, it may be a hearing officer > who oversees the process. It is difficult to categorize > states as fully judicial or fully administrative as the > process differs depending on the type of order being > processed. For example, there may be different processes for > contested (challenged) and uncontested orders. Cases > 2002-DR-050423-1 SHAW, SHEILA J 03/0912002 VS, COLEMAN, > Family JIMMY L Income Deduction 0 Closed - Non SRS > 2002-DR-006249-0 SHAW, SHEILA J 04124/2002 Paternity vs. > GONZALEZ, Div 38 Closed - SRS CARLOS A Kest, Sally D M SHAW, > SHEILA 08/29/2005 Paternity DOR JOCELYN VS. Div42 Re-Closed > GONZALEZ, Evans, Robert M CARLOS ALBERTO SHAW, SHEILA > 01/06/2010 Child Support DOR JOCELYN Div 42 Reopened Other > KARENA vs. Evans, Robert M WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN SHAW, > SHEILA 04112/2011 Domestic Violence w JOCELYN VS. Div 44 > Closed - SRS WILLIAMS, JARRID Jordan, John E DESHAUN > 2005-DR-014270-0 2010-DR-000170-0 2011-0R-006367-0 > CIRCUMVENTING COMPLAINTS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND > ENFORCEMENT UNDER (1) CIVIL ACTIONS BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL > SEC. 2000e-6. [Section 707] (a) Complaint... (2) STATE OF > FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CF OPERATING PROCEDURE CHILDREN AND > FAMILIES NO. 180-4 TALLAHASSEE, October 29, 2007 Inspector > General MANDATORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF > INSPECTOR GENERAL (3) The following is an abstract from the > Administration for Children and Families' website and the > Administration for Child Support Enforcement, both of which > publish all statutory guidelines for the collection of child > support and payments thereof to the recipient. collection > and distribution of child support payments Within this site > it is defined as follows Frequently Asked Questions about > Child Support Collection/Distribution For answers to > questions about your own case, you need to check with your > local or state child support office. State CSE agency > telephone numbers and addresses are at (English):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ > directories/ext/IVd_list.cfm (Spanish):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ > directories/ext/Espanol_IVd_ list.cfm State CSE agency > web site links are on our web site at the following > location: http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/ programs/cse/extinf.htm#exta > The following general information may be helpful: If the > state collects more in a month than is to be paid to the > family for their current and past due support, the rest of > the money can be used to repay the state and federal > governments for cash assistance * AFDC or TANF * that a > family received. Also, child support agencies can recover > all or part of the costs of their services from people who > are not in a cash assistance program. These can include the > cost of legal work done by agency attorneys or the costs of > locating a parent, for example. The money may be deducted > from the child support payment, or it may be collected from > the noncustodial parent. For more information on changes in > the law and how they may affect you, as well as the cost > recovery practices of your State, you should contact your > State child support enforcement agency. atty general > complaint sent regarding misconduct( SAME ATTORNEY SAME FIRM > WITH KNOWLEDGE OF PRIOR > CASES-http://www.avvo.com/attorneys/32803-fl-ana-tangelrodriguez-1255736.html)/Duty > to Report Lawyer Misconduct--Duty to > Supervise--Responsibilities of Members of Law Firm > Management Committees; These statutes include: Section > 210401 of the Vio Me to parentSent Me to infoSent Me to Investigate@KCTV5.comSent Sheila Jocelyn Shaw http://professsorshaw.blogspot.com/ --- On Thu, 4/28/16, Sheila Shaw wrote: > From: Sheila Shaw > Subject: Fw: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw: prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct > To: "parent" > Date: Thursday, April 28, 2016, 9:40 PM > Me to staff@caught.netSent On Fri, 4/29/16, Sheila Shaw wrote: > From: Sheila Shaw > Subject: Fw: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw: prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct > To: Investigate@KCTV5.com > Date: Friday, April 29, 2016, 3:41 PM > > > Sheila Jocelyn Shaw > http://professsorshaw.blogspot.com/ > > > --- On Thu, 4/28/16, Sheila Shaw > wrote: > > > From: Sheila Shaw > > Subject: Fw: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing > cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court > Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw: > prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct > > To: "parent" > > Date: Thursday, April 28, 2016, 9:40 PM > > > Me to PoliceSent Me to kkovobov@ndaa.orgDrafts Edit Me to ethics.help@usps.govSent Sheila Jocelyn Shaw http://professsorshaw.blogspot.com/ --- On Thu, 4/28/16, Sheila Shaw wrote: > From: Sheila Shaw > Subject: Fw: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw: prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct > To: "info" > Date: Thursday, April 28, 2016, 10:23 PM > Me to Gang AllianceSent Me to Victims2@pacific.eduSent Me to Victims2@pacific.eduSent Me to PublicSent From: Sheila Shaw ; To: ; Subject: Fw: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw Sent: Tue, May 24, 2016 3:50:11 PM From: Sheila Shaw ; To: Gang Alliance ; Subject: Fw: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw: prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct Sent: Wed, May 18, 2016 1:34:14 PM From: Sheila Shaw ; To: ; Subject: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw: prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct Sent: Thu, Apr 28, 2016 7:26:30 PM VAWA REPORT REGARDING NOT ONLY ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT IN CHILD CUSTODY MODIFICATION Intentionally omitted criminal nonsupport, offensive behaviour, professional misconduct and ethnic biasedness, child exploitation and institutional racism Title 42 section 42 1983, 14141 attorney prosecutorial child chustody exploitation including false statements never heard throughout case trial activity, false statements to commence proceedings Case Type: Paternity Date Filed: 4/24/2002 Location: Div 38 UCN: 482002DR006249A001OX Judge: Patricia A Doherty Status: Closed - SRS Date Description Pages Doc Request Doc 7/10/2013 Letter 12 3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address 1 1/1/2007 Case Reassigned to Division 2/11/2005 Notice 11/10/2004 Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 11/10/2004 Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Smith, Maura T 9/24/2004 Court Minutes 9/24/2004 Affidavit 9/13/2004 Pluries Summons Unserved 7/28/2004 Pluries Summons Served 7/27/2004 Notice of Hearing 7/16/2004 Motion to Dismiss 7/14/2004 Notice of Unavailability 7/14/2004 Notice Appearance of Counsel 7/1/2004 Affidavit of Lost/Destroyed Instrument 7/1/2004 Pluries Summons Issued 4/16/2004 Pluries Summons Issued 1/6/2004 Returned Mail 12/26/2003 Certificate of Mailing 12/26/2003 Affidavit 12/26/2003 Notice of Action Issued 10/13/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved 9/12/2003 Pluries Summons Issued 9/3/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved 9/3/2003 Affidavit 9/3/2003 Motion 9/3/2003 Motion for Default 9/3/2003 Affidavit 9/3/2003 Motion 9/3/2003 Motion for Default 8/4/2003 Pluries Summons Issued 7/31/2003 Request for Admissions 6/9/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved 5/21/2003 Pluries Summons Issued 5/1/2003 Third Party Summons 2/11/2003 Pluries Summons Issued 12/26/2002 Pluries Summons Served 11/8/2002 Pluries Summons Issued 9/24/2002 Pluries Summons Unserved 8/30/2002 Pluries Summons Issued 7/29/2002 Summons Returned 7/3/2002 Alias Summons Issued 5/15/2002 Summons Returned 4/24/2002 Summons Issued 4/24/2002 Affidavit of Non Military Service 4/24/2002 Request for Admissions 4/24/2002 Affidavit of Need 4/24/2002 Certificate of Compliance 4/24/2002 Financial Affidavit 4/24/2002 Civil Cover Sheet 4/24/2002 Petition 4/24/2002 Initial Judge Assigned Case Type: Paternity DOR Date Filed: 8/29/2005 Location: Div 42 UCN: 482005DR014270A001OX Judge: Heather P Rodriguez Status: Re-Closed Citation Number: Date Description Pages Doc Request Doc 3/3/2016 Returned Mail 3 2/11/2016 Order Denying 2 2/11/2016 Order Denying 2 4/14/2015 Motion to Vacate 10 4/14/2015 Notice 3 7/3/2013 Letter 5 3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address 1 8/7/2012 Letter 11 5/15/2012 Order Denying 1 5/7/2012 Birth Certificate 1 5/7/2012 Motion 107 5/7/2012 Civil Cover Sheet 2 4/2/2012 Notice of Change of Address 1 4/2/2012 Motion 74 12/5/2011 Letter 3 11/14/2011 Notice of Change of Address 1 9/19/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & Order 2 9/14/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 9/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 9/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 4/6/2011 Returned Mail 2 3/30/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & Order 3 3/28/2011 Child Support Information Sheet 1 3/28/2011 Certified Notice of Delinquent Support 1 3/28/2011 Notice to Depository 1 3/28/2011 Supplemental Financial Statement 1 3/28/2011 Court Minutes 1 3/28/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George 3/22/2011 Returned Mail 2 3/11/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment 1 2/24/2011 Notice of Change of Address 1 2/24/2011 Memorandum 7 2/24/2011 Copy/Copies 6 2/23/2011 Answer 6 2/18/2011 Alias Summons Returned Served 5 2/17/2011 Final Order 1 2/14/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George 1/14/2011 Returned Mail 2 1/4/2011 Notice of Hearing 1 1/4/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment 1 11/29/2010 Notice of Change of Address 1 10/22/2010 Order for Income Deduction 1 10/22/2010 Report/Recommendation and Final Judgment 4 10/19/2010 Court Minutes 1 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) 2 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) 2 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet 2 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet 1 10/19/2010 HEARING - Petition/Motion 10/8/2010 Returned Mail 2 9/20/2010 Order for Non Jury Trial 1 9/17/2010 Notice for Trial 1 8/12/2010 Response 2 6/14/2010 Alias Summons Issued 4 4/9/2010 Summons Returned Unserved 5 12/17/2009 Summons Issued 4 12/17/2009 Certificate of Compliance 2 12/17/2009 Financial Affidavit 4 12/17/2009 Petition 4 12/17/2009 Request for Admissions 1 11/1/2006 Notice of Change of Address 9/28/2006 HRS673 to Bureau 7/19/2006 Letter 7/19/2006 Letter 5/9/2006 Final Judgment 5/9/2006 Order for Income Deduction 5/9/2006 Disposed by Non-Jury Trial 5/9/2006 Final Judgment 5/8/2006 HRS673 to Bureau 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 4/28/2006 Affidavit 4/28/2006 Affidavit 4/28/2006 Court Minutes 3/29/2006 Order for Non Jury Trial 3/29/2006 Notice of Hearing 3/29/2006 Notice for Trial 3/29/2006 Request to Produce 3/28/2006 Request for Admissions 3/28/2006 Notice of Filing HLA Tissue Typing 2/9/2006 Notice 1/10/2006 HRS673 to Bureau 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 Court Minutes 1/5/2006 Financial Affidavit 1/5/2006 Child Support Information Sheet 1/5/2006 Child Support Information Sheet 12/6/2005 Notice of Hearing 12/6/2005 Order for Non Jury Trial 12/6/2005 Request to Produce 12/6/2005 Notice for Trial 12/5/2005 Answer 10/31/2005 Summons Returned 10/31/2005 Summons Returned 10/27/2005 Answer Denying Allegations 8/29/2005 Summons Issued 8/29/2005 Request for Admissions 8/29/2005 Certificate of Compliance 8/29/2005 Financial Affidavit 8/29/2005 Notice of Social Security 8/29/2005 Civil Cover Sheet 8/29/2005 Petition 8/29/2005 Initial Judge Assigned VOR (Viewable on Request) Certain case documents contain sensitive or personally identifiable information that must be manually redacted before they are viewable by the general public. Documents listed in the Docket Events section as VOR are public documents that require further redaction by Clerk staff before they can be viewed. Follow the steps below to request access to these documents: Check the Request Doc checkbox for the document you wish to view. You may repeat this for other VOR documents on the same case. Once all document requests have been made for this case, click the Submit button. A confirmation screen will display, where you will be asked to enter or confirm your email address to finalize your request. You will receive an initial email notification to confirm your request, followed by additional email notifications as requested documents become available. The Clerk’s office makes every effort to complete these requests in a timely manner. For definitions of document types, please refer to our glossary. Hearings Date Hearing Time Location Pages Doc 3/28/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 AM 2/14/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 AM 10/19/2010 Petition/Motion 1:00 PM 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 8:00 AM 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM Cause of Action Fraud Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141: makes it unlawful for state or local law enforcement agencies to allow officers to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives persons of rights protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. This law is commonly referred to as the Police Misconduct Statute. the exintimate partner and public officer employee misconduct BUSINESS TORT RELATED-ADVERSARIAL TORTS OR MATERNAL INJURIES WITH INTENT http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer_29.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/any-police-department-receiving-federal.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/family-violence-prevention-act-victim.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/false-cpi-personal-torts-tort-of-fraud.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/jarrid-williams-probation-dc-346801.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/201 Federal laws Federal law 42 U.S.C. § 5772 & 42 U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5772) defines a "missing child" as "any individual less than 18 years of age whose whereabouts are unknown to such individual"s legal custodian." RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. 827.03 Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; penalties.— intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child; or (c) Active encouragement of any person to commit an act that results or could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child. A person who knowingly or willfully abuses a child without causing great bodily harm, http://definitions.uslegal/ com/w/willful-professional- misconduct PRINCIPAL CASES - HOME STATE ORIGIN INDIANA REGISTER OF ACTIONS CASE NO. 1993-CF-008458-AO cases: OC9901243 PA cases OC9901243 and 02-83719047104532 PA Cause number 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL Narrative "an act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere with the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the dignity of the court or respect for its authority. There are two kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct contempt openly and in the presence of the court, resists the power of the court, 102 A. 400, 406; and consequential, or constructive contempt results from matters outside the court, such as failure to comply... MISUSE OF OFFICE TO ENGAGE IN RACIAL PROFILING, FRAUD, AIDING AND ABETTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT RECOVERY BY FALSE ALLEGATIONS USED TO ABATE DEPARTMENTAL COLLECTION INTERVENTIONS ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT AND MOTHER TO CASES IN THE FAMILY COURT, AND CHILD SUPPORT OCSE, AFFILIATED WITH FLORIDA DCF DEPARTMENTAL RISS SYSTEM DATABASES ON FEBRUARY 4TH, 2011 DURING WHICH TIME COURT DATES OR CONCURRENT ENFORCEMENT ACTION WAS BEING UNDERGONE. CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 MANDATORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERA #Employee Misconduct http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/03/7750844white-collar-crime-victim.html, http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/12/you-cannot-use-information-available-to.html OIG Investigative and Law Enforcement Authority The Office of Inspector General (OIG), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), was administratively established by the Secretary of Agriculture in 1962 following a major criminal fraud scandal affecting several agencies within USDA. OIG was later legislatively established by Congress under the Inspector General Act of 1978 (Public Law [P.L.] 95-452), as amended. Pursuant to the Inspector General Act of 1978 and Section 1337 of the Agriculture and Food Act of 1981 (P.L. 97-98), OIG Investigations is the law enforcement arm of the Department, with Department-wide investigative jurisdiction. OIG Special Agents conduct investigations of significant criminal activities involving USDA programs, operations, and personnel, and are authorized to make arrests, execute warrants, and carry firearms. The types of investigations conducted by OIG Special Agents involve criminal activities such as frauds in subsidy, price support, benefits, and insurance programs; significant thefts of Government property or funds; bribery; extortion; smuggling; and assaults on employees. Investigations involving criminal activity that affects the health and safety of the public, such as meat packers who knowingly sell hazardous food products and individuals who tamper with food regulated by USDA, are also high-profile investigative priorities. In addition, OIG Special Agents are poised to provide emergency law enforcement response to USDA declared emergencies and suspected incidents of terrorism affecting USDA regulated industries, as well as USDA programs, operations, personnel, and installations, in coordination with Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies, as appropriate. The enactment of the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-37) authorized OIG to receive funds and property through criminal and civil Federal forfeiture proceedings, and through equitable sharing of forfeited funds and property controlled by the U.S. Department of Justice. Forfeiture proceeds have severe restrictions mandated by statutes and U.S. Department of Justice policy as to how they are used. Forfeiture funds cannot be used in lieu of the OIG's regular appropriations. False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE (NO. 180-4 https://drive.google.com/folder/d/0B84_tgjFbXNLcUpfaDBSRHBSZDQ/editATORY REPORTING REQUIiREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Clearly outlines employee fraud and misconduct within the scope of cause f action by the Office of the Inspector General within the Florida Departmentof Children. § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § 775.085) (complaint ACAP THE FLORIDA BAR INQUIRY COMPLAINT FORM http://goo.gl/h9wjQr) http://www.dcf.state.fl.us/admin/ig/content/AR2013-14.pdf Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses wdith false reporting for adults. https://oig.justice.gov/hotline/contact-doj.htm cc: letter to OIG FL DCF Keith Parks Resending Complaint Attached Department form (complaint ACAP THE FLORIDA BAR INQUIRY COMPLAINT FORM Fw: ATTN KEITH PARKS CONTINUING INSPECTOR GENERAL MANDATORY REPORTING TO IG OFFICE, MISCONDUCT COMPLAINT Aug 10, 2015, 12:19 PM § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § 775.085 Enhances penalty for crimes evidencing "prejudice based on the race, color, ancestry, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, mental or physical disability, or advanced age of the victim. The duty to report misconduct is one of the ethical duties imposed on attorneys in the United States by the rules governing professional responsibility http://www.iape.org/index.php http://definitions.uslegal. com/w/willful-professional- misconduct/ Rule 8.3—Reporting Professional Misconduct (a) A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, shall inform the appropriate professional authority. (b) A lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for office shall inform the appropriate authority... Keith Parks, Inspector General 1317 Winewood Blvd., Bldg. 5, Second Floor Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700 Phone: (850) 488-1225 Fax: (850) 488-1428 Maxine McGregor Client Relations Coordinator Email: Maxine_McGregor@dcf.state.fl.us Address: 400 West Robinson Street Hurston Bldg., South Tower, S S-1106 Orlando Florida 32801 United States Phone Number: 407-317-7000 x7047 ACCESS Florida Gretchen Perry Client Relations Coordinator Address: 400 West Robinson Street Hurston Bldg., South Tower, S S-1106 Orlando Florida 32801 United States Phone Number: 407-317-7000 x7045 1) CPS may only place founded reports on the state's central registry of child abuse and neglect. (In some states, unfounded reports are placed on the central registry, which not only causes harm to innocent people but is also a violation of due process.) 2) Caseworkers must inform families if a report is anonymous. (There is a difference between anonymous and confidential—reporters’ names should be kept confidential, but anonymous reports are not as reliable as those made by known reporters.) 3) Parents must be allowed to select an unrelated adult to be present during interviews of their children. 4) Investigations must cease immediately upon discovery that the allegations are false. Continuing the investigation process despite proof of innocence only traumatizes the family and wastes state resources. 5) Parents must have access to the records of their investigations. HSLDA also continues to assist with incorporating the following two federal CAPTA requirements into state codes: 1) Requiring child protective services workers to be trained in their duty to protect the statutory and constitutional rights of those they are investigating. 2) Requiring child protective services personnel to advise individuals subject to a child abuse and neglect investigation of the complaint or allegation made against them. Notes 1. Children’s Bureau. (2003). Child Maltreatment. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved fromhttp://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm03/index.htm. 2. Calabretta v. Floyd, 189 F.3d 808 (1999). Claudia Hernandez 400 W. Robinson St. (Hurston South Tower) Ste. # S-509, Orlando, FL 32801-1718 Preceding letter of complaint cc: INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM ATTACHED DOCUMENT TO THE FLORIDA BAR THE SPECIFIC THING OR THINGS I AM COMPLAINING ABOUT ARE: THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA JOCELYN SHAW PO BOX 5147, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33657-5175 PARTY TO THE COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S) FLORIDA BAR MEMBER(S): SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS MACKEY Heather Morcroft (Appellate Atty) 20 n Orange Ave Ste 700 Orlando 32801 FBN 0709859 407-325-3585 (ATTORNEY DECEIT, COLLUSION PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT, FRAUD ACAP DECEIT,https://t.co/fmLL4KZ0CM SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221,CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 https://t.co/LfpsXYrOx6 http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2016/08/atty-wayne-starr-hershwitz_46.html?m=1 WAYNE STARR, CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ, SHYANN ELIJAH, RUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ) INFORMS THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (ACAP) WITHIN THE TIME AND STATUTORY LIMITATIONS OF 6 SIX YEARS, THAT THE FOREGOING COMPLAINT IS IN REGARDS TO THE VIOLATIONS SET FORTH: http://www.floridabar.org/divexe/rrtfb.nsf/FV/0B6C8E5CDCA464D685257172004B0FBD 4-8 MAINTAINING THE INTEGRITY OF THE PROFESSION RULE 4-8.4 MISCONDUCT THAT ON THE ONSET OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA SHAW, AS THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION 7, ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT: Juvenile Division 2000 E. Michigan St. Suite 300 Orlando, FL 32806 PROCEEDING WERE COMMENCED WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE HISTORICAL AND CONCURRENT CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS, AND HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS CONCURRENTLY PUBLISHED IN DIVISION 42 COURT, VIA CLERK OF THE ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE RISS DATABASE, THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR ACCOUNTS OF INTERAGENCY ACCESS WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. THE COMPLAINANT MAKES REFERENCE THAT THE ATTORNEY’S, WITH KNOWLEDGE, ACTED IN A DECEITFUL MANNER, NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF FRAUD RELATIVE TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS. "ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW WERE DIVESTED AND SUBSEQUENT LEGAL CAUSATION INCLUSIVE OF : 1. A MATERIAL INJURY IN THE PROCEEDINGS BELOW THAT CANNOT BE CONCLUDED ON POST JUDGEMENT APPEAL,2. INJURY WAS CAUSED BY A DEPARTURE FORM THE ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW (WHEN THEY ARE VIOLATED) OCCURRED. IMPROPER PURPOSE USED TO ACCESS TO THE FACILITY/HARASSMENT & TORTS)CONTINUATION OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT Fw: REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION TO REOPEN CASE CASE NO 2005-DR-014270-O DIVISION 42; Fw: ATTN KEITH PARKS Action founded on negligence, fraud and white collar criminal behavior 39.0141 A Missing Children Report is Required and is found to be absent in all proceedings prior to date. & 95.11 Tort actions for fraud or assault & 39.0014,39.0141 MISSING CHILDRENS REPORT REQUIRED WHICH IN ITS ABSENCE AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS CONSTITUTES FRAUD. TORT ACTIONS OF FRAUD INCLUSIVE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND VAWA BY THE FATHERS TO CASE WHO KNEW THE ALLEGATIONS WERE FALSE THE ATTORNEY’S TO CASE DID NOT CONSOLIDATE THE TWO DIVISIONS, DIVISION 7 AND DIVISION 42, WITH KNOWLEDGE THAT A “THRESHOLD OF DEMONSTRATIVE SHOWING OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT” IN ADDITION TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CHILD WOULD BE NECESSARY UNDER PROVISIONS OUTLINED REGARDING MINORS TO JUVENILE DEPENDENCY COURT CIVIL RULES OF PRACTICE, FLORIDA STATUTES CHAPTER 39.PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO CHILDREN THE DEVASTATION FROM THE PRESIDING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL PROCESS ALONG WITH THE STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT, ATTORNEY DECEIT INCLUDED THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS: § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. Civil contempt is conduct directed against the rights of the opposing party. law-imposed obligation ;"an act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere with the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the dignity of the court or respect for its authority. There are two kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct contempt openly and in the presence of the court, resists the power of the court, 102 A. 400, 406; and consequential, or constructive contempt results from matters outside the court, such as failure to comply with orders. The basic standards governing fraud on the court are reasonably straightforward. As set forth in Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998): The requisite fraud on the court occurs where “it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.” Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989) . . . . The trial court has the inherent authority, within the exercise of sound judicial discretion, to dismiss an action when a plaintiff has perpetrated a fraud on the court, or where a party refuses to comply with court orders. Kornblum v. Schneider, 609 So. 2d 138, 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). The types of issues raised in habeas corpus petitions were coded into the following categories: ineffective assistance of counsel (failure to object to admissibility/sufficiency of evidence, failure to call witnesses, failure to cross-examine, and failure to object to denial of a continuance notion), trial court errors (failure to suppress improper evidence, improper jury instructions), (failure to disclose, use of perjured testimony, and inflammatory summation), 4th amendment (unlawful arrest), 5th amendment Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Title VIII consists of seven sections and is also referred to as the "Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of 2002". It describes specific criminal penalties for manipulation, destruction or alteration of financial records or other interference with investigations, while providing certain protections for whistleblowers. cc: (http://www.floridabar.org/divexe/rrtfb.nsf/FV/0B6C8E5CDCA464D685257172004B0FBD) A lawyer shall not: (a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another; (b) commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects; (c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, except that it shall not be professional misconduct for a lawyer for a criminal law enforcement agency or regulatory agency to advise others about or to supervise another in an undercover investigation, unless prohibited by law or rule, and it shall not be professional misconduct for a lawyer employed in a capacity other than as a lawyer by a criminal law enforcement agency or regulatory agency to participate in an undercover investigation, unless prohibited by law or rule; (d) engage in conduct in connection with the practice of law that is prejudicial to the administration of justice, including to knowingly, or through callous indifference, disparage, humiliate, or discriminate against litigants, jurors, witnesses, court personnel, or other lawyers on any basis, including, but not limited to, on account of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, national origin, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, age, socioeconomic status, employment, or physical characteristic; (e) state or imply an ability to influence improperly a government agency or official or to achieve results by means that violate the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law; (f) knowingly assist a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct or other law; (g) fail to respond, in writing, to any official inquiry by bar counsel or a disciplinary agency, as defined elsewhere in these rules, when bar counsel or the agency is conducting an investigation into the lawyer's conduct. A written response shall be made:(1) within 15 days of the date of the initial written investigative inquiry by bar counsel, grievance committee, or board of governors; (2) within 10 days of the date of any follow-up written investigative inquiries by bar counsel, grievance committee, or board of governors; (3) within the time stated in any subpoena issued under these Rules Regulating The Florida Bar (without additional time allowed for mailing); (4) as provided in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure or order of the referee in matters assigned to a referee; and (5) as provided in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure or order of the Supreme Court of Florida for matters pending action by that court. Except as stated otherwise herein or in the applicable rules, all times for response shall be calculated as provided elsewhere in these Rules Regulating The Florida Bar and may be extended or shortened by bar counsel or the disciplinary agency making the official inquiry upon good cause shown. Failure to respond to an official inquiry with no good cause shown may be a matter of contempt and processed in accordance with rule 3-7.11(f) of these Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. (h) willfully refuse, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, to timely pay a child support obligation; or (i) engage in sexual conduct with a client or a representative of a client that exploits or adversely affects the interests of the client or the lawyer-client relationship. If the sexual conduct commenced after the lawyer-client relationship was formed it shall be presumed that the sexual conduct exploits or adversely affects the interests of the client or the lawyer-client relationship. A lawyer may rebut this presumption by proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the sexual conduct did not exploit or adversely affect the interests of the client or the lawyer-client relationship. The prohibition and presumption stated in this rule do not apply to a lawyer in the same firm as another lawyer representing the client if the lawyer involved in the sexual conduct does not personally provide legal services to the client and is screened from access to the file concerning the legal representation.Comment Lawyers are subject to discipline when they violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another, as when they request or instruct an agent to do so on the lawyer's behalf. Subdivision (a), however, does not prohibit a lawyer from advising a client concerning action the client is legally entitled to take, provided that the client is not used to indirectly violate the Rules of Professional Conduct. Many kinds of illegal conduct reflect adversely on fitness to practice law, such as offenses involving fraud and the offense of willful failure to file an income tax return. However, some kinds of offense carry no such implication. Traditionally, the distinction was drawn in terms of offenses involving "moral turpitude." That concept can be construed to include offenses concerning some matters of personal morality, such as adultery and comparable offenses, that have no specific connection to fitness for the practice of law. Although a lawyer is personally answerable to the entire criminal law, a lawyer should be professionally answerable only for offenses that indicate lack of those characteristics relevant to law practice. Offenses involving violence, dishonesty, breach of trust, or serious interference with the administration of justice are in that category. A pattern of repeated offenses, even ones of minor significance when considered separately, can indicate indifference to legal obligation. A lawyer may refuse to comply with an obligation imposed by law upon a good faith belief that no valid obligation exists. The provisions of rule 4-1.2(d) concerning a good faith challenge to the validity, scope, meaning, or application of the law apply to challenges of legal regulation of the practice of law. Subdivision (c) recognizes instances where lawyers in criminal law enforcement agencies or regulatory agencies advise others about or supervise others in undercover investigations, and provides an exception to allow the activity without the lawyer engaging in professional misconduct. The exception acknowledges current, acceptable practice of these agencies. Although the exception appears in this rule, it is also applicable to rules 4-4.1 and 4-4.3. However, nothing in the rule allows the lawyer to engage in such conduct if otherwise prohibited by law or rule. Subdivision (d) of this rule proscribes conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice. Such proscription includes the prohibition against discriminatory conduct committed by a lawyer while performing duties in connection with the practice of law. The proscription extends to any characteristic or status that is not relevant to the proof of any legal or factual issue in dispute. Such conduct, when directed towards litigants, jurors, witnesses, court personnel, or other lawyers, whether based on race, ethnicity, gender, religion, national origin, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, age, socioeconomic status, employment, physical characteristic, or any other basis, subverts the administration of justice and undermines the public's confidence in our system of justice, as well as notions of equality. This subdivision does not prohibit a lawyer from representing a client as may be permitted by applicable law, such as, by way of example, representing a client accused of committing discriminatory conduct. Lawyers holding public office assume legal responsibilities going beyond those of other citizens. A lawyer's abuse of public office can suggest an inability to fulfill the professional role of attorney. The same is true of abuse of positions of private trust such as trustee, executor, administrator, guardian, or agent and officer, director, or manager of a corporation or other organization. A lawyer's obligation to respond to an inquiry by a disciplinary agency is stated in subdivision (g) of this rule and subdivision (h)(2) of rule 3-7.6. While response is mandatory, the lawyer may deny the charges or assert any available privilege or immunity or interpose any disability that prevents disclosure of a certain matter. A response containing a proper invocation thereof is sufficient under the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. This obligation is necessary to ensure the proper and efficient operation of the disciplinary system. Subdivision (h) of this rule was added to make consistent the treatment of attorneys who fail to pay child support with the treatment of other professionals who fail to pay child support, in accordance with the provisions of section 61.13015, Florida Statutes. That section provides for the suspension or denial of a professional license due to delinquent child support payments after all other available remedies for the collection of child support have been exhausted. Likewise, subdivision (h) of this rule should not be used as the primary means for collecting child support, but should be used only after all other available remedies for the collection of child support have been exhausted. Before a grievance may be filed or a grievance procedure initiated under this subdivision, the court that entered the child support order must first make a finding of willful refusal to pay. The child support obligation at issue under this rule includes both domestic (Florida) and out-of-state (URESA) child support obligations, as well as arrearages. Subdivision (i) proscribes exploitation of the client or the lawyer-client relationship by means of commencement of sexual conduct. The lawyer-client relationship is grounded on mutual trust. A sexual relationship that exploits that trust compromises the lawyer-client relationship. Attorneys have a duty to exercise independent professional judgment on behalf of clients. Engaging in sexual relationships with clients has the capacity to impair the exercise of that judgment.FALSE STATEMENTS MISCONDUCT FALSE KIDNAPPING REPORTS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AND TO THE JUVENILE COURT LEGAL PHILANTHROPY MISUSE OF OFFICE INSTITUTIONAL CHILD ABUSE LEGAL ABUSE LAWYER MISCONDUCT ETHNIC BIASEDNESS MOCKERY TRIAL ERROR INTENTIONAL OMISSIONS ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NON SUPPORT & CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY ACT VIOLATIONS, FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW VIOLATIONS THAT ON THE ONSET OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA SHAW, AS THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION 7, ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT: Juvenile Division 2000 E. Michigan St. Suite 300 Orlando, FL 32806 PROCEEDING WERE COMMENCED WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE HISTORICAL AND CONCURRENT CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS, AND HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS CONCURRENTLY PUBLISHED IN DIVISION 42 COURT, VIA CLERK OF THE ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE RISS DATABASE, THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR ACCOUNTS OF INTERAGENCY ACCESS WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. THE COMPLAINANT MAKES REFERENCE THAT THE ATTORNEY’S, WITH KNOWLEDGE, ACTED IN A DECEITFUL MANNER, NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF FRAUD RELATIVE TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS. "ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW WERE DIVESTED AND SUBSEQUENT LEGAL CAUSATION INCLUSIVE OF : 1. A MATERIAL INJURY IN THE PROCEEDINGS BELOW THAT CANNOT BE CONCLUDED ON POST JUDGEMENT APPEAL,2. INJURY WAS CAUSED BY A DEPARTURE FORM THE ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW (WHEN THEY ARE VIOLATED) OCCURRED. THE ATTORNEY’S TO CASE DID NOT CONSOLIDATE THE TWO DIVISIONS, DIVISION 7 AND DIVISION 42, WITH KNOWLEDGE THAT A “THRESHOLD OF DEMONSTRATIVE SHOWING OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT” IN ADDITION TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CHILD WOULD BE NECESSARY UNDER PROVISIONS OUTLINED REGARDING MINORS TO JUVENILE DEPENDENCY COURT CIVIL RULES OF PRACTICE, FLORIDA STATUTES CHAPTER 39.PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO CHILDREN THE DEVASTATION FROM THE PRESIDING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL PROCESS ALONG WITH THE STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT, ATTORNEY DECEIT INCLUDED THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS: § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. Civil contempt is conduct directed against the rights of the opposing party. law-imposed obligation ;"an act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere with the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the dignity of the court or respect for its authority. There are two kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct contempt openly and in the presence of the court, resists the power of the court, 102 A. 400, 406; and consequential, or constructive contempt results from matters outside the court, such as failure to comply with orders. The basic standards governing fraud on the court are reasonably straightforward. As set forth in Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998): The requisite fraud on the court occurs where “it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.” Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989) . . . . The trial court has the inherent authority, within the exercise of sound judicial discretion, to dismiss an action when a plaintiff has perpetrated a fraud on the court, or where a party refuses to comply with court orders. Kornblum v. Schneider, 609 So. 2d 138, 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). The types of issues raised in habeas corpus petitions were coded into the following categories: ineffective assistance of counsel (failure to object to admissibility/sufficiency of evidence, failure to call witnesses, failure to cross-examine, and failure to object to denial of a continuance notion), trial court errors (failure to suppress improper evidence, improper jury instructions), (failure to disclose, use of perjured testimony, and inflammatory summation), 4th amendment (unlawful arrest), 5th amendment Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Title VIII consists of seven sections and is also referred to as the "Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of 2002". It describes specific criminal penalties for manipulation, destruction or alteration of financial records or other interference with investigations, while providing certain protections for whistleblowers. cc: Letter regarding fraud on the court,absent administrative remedy or action in a timely manner, that such a biasedness occurred it is described as unconscionably ethnically biased, a white collar criminal act by a party who misused his/her office to aid and assist avoidance of judicial action, that the action was in violation of the minor to case’s rights, that the action was in violation of parental rights to recovery of child support and paternity establishment in the Orange County, Ninth Judicial Circuit and Court, Division 42. Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:39 PM Subject: ATTORNEY GENERAL COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST Hershkowitz Russell S Attorney Category: Bankruptcy Law [Edit] 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 (407) 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com Thank you for contacting the Attorney General's Office regarding ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT . Our staff will process it as soon as possible and, if necessary, respond appropriately. We appreciate hearing from concerned citizens such as yourself. If you wish to keep abreast of the activities of this office, you may wish to consider a subscription to our electronic newsletter Weekly Briefing. Or perhaps our Consumer Alerts. Should you wish to subscribe to either, or both, publications, please visit our subscription page. COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST RUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire= Retained 407-786-2889( 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 (407) 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NON SUPPORT & CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY ACT VIOLATIONS, FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW VIOLATIONS http://www.hinshawlaw.com/the-lawyers-lawyer-newsletter---recent-developments-in-risk-management-03-09-2012/ The duty to report misconduct is one of the ethical duties imposed on attorneys in the United States by the rules governing professional responsibility. With certain exceptions, an attorney who becomes aware that either a fellow attorney or a judge has committed an act in violation of the rules of e... Duty to report misconduct; code of conduct https://www.facebook.com/OrangClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 ( TORT LAW: A tort is a civil wrong resulting from a violation of a legal right not created by contract for which monetary redress is provided. This may be (a) an act or (b) an omission. More formally, a tort may be defined as a wrongful act or omission arising in the course of social re ships other than contracts which violates a person's legally protected rights for which the law provides a remedy in the form of an action for damages. There are two basic classifications of torts: (a) negligence which is the result of an unintentional act (b) intentional acts or omissions which results in a breach of someone's rights. There is a third group in this area that should be explained. It is referred to as strict liability.) 8-2.241 Civil Laws Governing Law Enforcement Misconduct BUT ALSO LAWS THAT ARE FOR THE PREVENTION OF NEGLECT OF THE CHILD. 827.03 Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; penalties.— intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child; or (c) Active encouragement of any person to commit an act that results or could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child. A person who knowingly or willfully abuses a child without causing great bodily harm, Subject: professional misconduct, failure to comply nonprofit compliance, ethnic biasedness and duty to report misconduct by attorney of judicial misconduct signed and filed a valid declaration of paternity that has the force and effect of a judgment, enforceable by contempt REQUIREMENT OF STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED PROCEDURES TO IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] (a) In order to satisfy section 454(20)(A), each State must have in effect laws requiring the use of the following procedures, consistent with this section and with regulations of the Secretary, to increase the effectiveness of the program which the State administers under this part: Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] (a (C) Voluntary paternity acknowledgment.— (iv) Use of paternity acknowledgment affidavit.—Such procedures must require the State to develop and use an affidavit for the voluntary acknowledgment of paternity which includes the minimum requirements of the affidavit specified by the Secretary under section 452(a)(7) for the voluntary acknowledgment of paternity, and to give full faith and credit to such an affidavit signed in any other State according to its procedures. THERE HAS BEEN A BREACH OF DUTY/NEGLECT OF DUTY WHEREAS ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION WOULD HAVE REMEDIED AN EXTENSIVE DELAY IN PROVIDING ADEQUATE CHILD SUPPORT OR FINANCIAL SUPPORT. IT IS ALSO MORE THAT SUSPECTED THAT THE UNTIMELY DELAYS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING BREACH(ES) the 1996 reforms require States to adopt laws that give the CSE agency authority to initiate a series of expedited procedures without the necessity of obtaining an order from any other administrative agency or judicial tribunal and The Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (VAWA) and the 1997 Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act and MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW You cannot use information available to you because of your job, but not available to the public, for your personal benefit or for the benefit of others. § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. Title VI allows persons to file administrative complaints with the federal departments and agencies that provide financial assistance alleging discrimination based on race, color, or national origin by recipients of federal funds. Under Title VI, EPA has a responsibility to ensure that its funds are not being used to subsidize discrimination based on race, color, or national origin. This prohibition against discrimination under Title VI has been a statutory mandate since 1964 and EPA has had Title VI regulations since 1973. EPA's Office of Civil Rights is responsible for the Agency's administration of Title VI, including investigation of such ... A registered support order is confirmed and immediately enforceable unless the respondent files an objection in a record within a fixed period of time, almost invariably the 20 days suggested originally, Sections 603 and 607. Section 604. TITLE 42 SECTIONS 666 AND 654, 657 COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION CITATION FROM THE FEDERAL STATUTE OF THE US CODE § 657. Distribution of collected support The following is an abstract from the Administration for Children and Families' website and the Administration for Child Support Enforcement, both of which publish all statutory guidelines for the collection of child support and payments thereof to the recipient. collection and distribution of child support payments Within this site it is defined as follows Frequently Asked Questions about Child Support Collection/Distribution For answers to questions about your own case, you need to check with your local or state child support office. State CSE agency telephone numbers and addresses are at (English):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ directories/ext/IVd_list.cfm (Spanish):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ directories/ext/Espanol_IVd_ list.cfm State CSE agency web site links are on our web site at the following location: http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/ programs/cse/extinf.htm#exta The following general information may be helpful: If the state collects more in a month than is to be paid to the family for their current and past due support, the rest of the money can be used to repay the state and federal governments for cash assistance * AFDC or TANF * that a family received. Also, child support agencies can recover all or part of the costs of their services from people who are not in a cash assistance program. These can include the cost of legal work done by agency attorneys or the costs of locating a parent, for example. The money may be deducted from the child support payment, or it may be collected from the noncustodial parent. For more information on changes in the law and how they may affect you, as well as the cost recovery practices of your State, you should contact your State child support enforcement agency. Outline of Children's Rights IN WHICH THESE VIOLATIONS EXPLOITED THE MINORS IN PROCEEDINGS INCLUDE: 1. The right to basic necessities of food, clothing and shelter. 2. The right to quality medical attention. 3. The right to equal education. 4. The right to be treated fairly, regardless of age, mental development, gender, race or culture. 5. The right to speak up and be heard when they are injured. 6. The right to be treated with care in our medical facilities. 7. The right to a safe environment in which they can play and learn. 8. The right to equal protection from law enforcement. 9. The right to equal representation in our legal system. 10. The right to pursue opportunities designed to help them reach their full potential in life. From: nine09digits@yahoo.com To: Karlene_Cole-Palmer@dcf.state.fl.us Sent: Tue, Dec 9, 2014 2:41 PM EST Subject: WHITE COLLAR CRIME COMPLAINT STARTING WITH THE CPI RISS ACCESS TAX REFUND INTERFERENCE Fw: enforcement of Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code, a statute that criminalizes false statements made directly or indirectly to the Federal government. Central RegionKarlene Cole-Palmer CLS Regional Director Children’s Legal Services Department of Children and Families 400 West Robinson Street, Suite S1114 Orlando, Florida 32801 Office: (407) 245-0530 E-mail: Karlene_Cole-Palmer@dcf.state.fl.us Karlene Cole-Palmer,it is believed that the CPI in this complaint accessed the SDU, state disbursement unit on February 3rd,2011 and February 4th 2011 to intercept child support payments, as indicated by a SDU representative upon inquiry regarding a recent child support order, judgement, issued by Division 42, Orange County, Florida, respondent and payor, Carlos Alberto Gonzalez. The CPI false allegations were intended to intercept payments, indicative as a white collar economic crime, fraud. The CPI made this intercept by deception on the court and fraud alleging that my children had been kidnapped as a dismissal was entered agaiinst Felicia Handley, the CPI in this complaint on January 28th, 2011 after without a court order or any documentation she not only harassed me in public, but violated the children's and my rights the evening of January 27th, 2011 arriving at a convience store with the Orlando Police Department. Felicia Handley's accompanying agent jumped out a gray yelling "it's over", 'its over" as witnessed by Orlando Police Department. The incident occurred on the evening of Michyl Shaw's science night at Ferncreek Elementary, whereas the parents and the children were transported by Orange County District Schools to Ferncreek Elementary and then home again. Shortly after departing off the school bus and walking over to the covenience store nearby our residence, the police and a gray car that Handley and the accompanying agent were in, pulled up in front of the convience store and detained myself and my children stating that they had a right to take the children that evening until court the following morning, and that they had already contacted the fathers of the children prior to arrival which is where the children were to be taken in to temporary custody without an order from the court until the hearing the following morning on January 28th, 2011. At the hearing held in the judicial chambers of Judge Anthony Johnson, DCF representatives, the CPI, Felicia Handley were informed that there would be a dismissal and the children were to attend school, and until further notice of an eviction from the residential address, no action would be heard.Felicia Hankley follows with a malicious, attrocious lie about missing children and kidnapping, that both Michyl Shaw and Isis Shaw had been missing since February 3, 2011, which was false, and verifiable by the children's primary doctor who had seen both children on the evening of February 3rd, 2011 while in the custody of the mother, myself. In addition, no staff members or persons of authority at the residential dwelling had ever given such information to Felicia Handley. I am inquiring as to what action under Florida and Federal Statute has been taken against Felicia Handley or the Department in addition to further evidence of fraud on the court, intentional omission by DCF departmental attorneys constituting attorney deciet and misconduct, of child support recovery proceedings in division 42 of which the mother and the children were under representation druing which time there ware repeated "reserved actions", and actions in the case regarding termination of parental rights which were unauthorized, not consulted upon or actions that continued to delay recovery and collection from what is referred legal as CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT, under federal recovery. Chapter 39 details what is referred to as a "threshold of demonstrative illustration" by the noncustodical parent of financial support outside of any family support or mental support in the interests of the children (PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO CHILDREN http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0000-0099/0039/0039.html) Sec. 411. Data collection and reporting Social Security Act Title IV https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/programs/css/child_support_handbook_with_toc.pdf The federal child support program wasestablished in 1975 under Title IV-D of the SocialSecurity Act. Case number 482005DR14270A001OX >>>>>2005DR1427 Case Type: Paternity DOR Date Filed: 08/29/2005 Location: Div 42 Judicial Officer: Evans, Robert M Uniform Case Number: 482005DR014270A001OX Related Case Information Related Cases 2002-DR-006249-O (Paternity) Party Information Petitioner SHAW, SHEILA JOCELYN Lead Attorneys BARBARA FANCHER (LIMITED) JONES, Esquire Retained 407-849-1133(W) Respondent GONZALEZ, CARLOS ALBERTO Events & Orders of the Court DISPOSITIONS 05/15/2012 Order Denying (Judicial Officer: Evans, Robert M) Comment (Petitioner's Motion/Writ of Habeas Corpus Contesting Custody Order) 09/19/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & Order (Judicial Officer: Evans, Robert M) Comment (Denying Petitioner's Writ of Habeas Corpus/Contempt of Court Order) 03/30/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & Order (Judicial Officer: Evans, Robert M) Comment (Final Order on Motion to Set Arrears) 02/17/2011 Final Order (Judicial Officer: Evans, Robert M) Comment (on motion withdrawal of motion to set reserved arrears) 10/22/2010 Report/Recommendation and Final Judgment (Judicial Officer: Roche, Renee A) Comment (Petition for Support) 05/09/2006 Final Judgment OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS 08/07/2012 Letter to Judge Evans (Faxed) w/attached Re: Child Support 05/07/2012 Civil Cover Sheet 05/07/2012 Motion for writ of Habeas Corpus contesting custody order/Modification of visitation w/att (Re-Closed 5/15/12) 05/07/2012 Birth Certificate as to Male Child 04/02/2012 Motion for writ habeas corpus contesting custody order w/att (Re-Closed 5/15/12) 04/02/2012 Notice of Change of Address 12/05/2011 Letter Amended Letter/Writ of Habeas Corpus to Hearing Officer/Court 11/14/2011 Notice of Change of Address 09/14/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus contempt of court order w/att (Re-Closed 09/19/11) 09/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus contempt of court order w/att (Re-Closed 09/19/11) 09/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus contempt of court order w/att (Re-Closed 09/19/11) 04/06/2011 Returned Mail 03/28/2011 Motion (8:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Winslow, George) Result: Report and Recommendation 03/28/2011 Court Minutes 03/28/2011 Supplemental Financial Statement 03/28/2011 Notice to Depository Request for Multiple Adjustments to Collections 03/28/2011 Certified Notice of Delinquent Support 03/28/2011 Child Support Information Sheet 03/22/2011 Returned Mail 03/11/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment and Notice of Hearing on 3/28/11 @ 8am in Rm 540 (Re-Closed 03/30/11) 02/24/2011 Copy/Copies of Child Support and Federal Law 02/24/2011 Memorandum from Office of the Attorney General Re: Prosecutive Guidelines & Procedures for Child Support Recovery Act of 1992 02/24/2011 Notice of Change of Address 02/23/2011 Answer 02/18/2011 Alias Summons Returned Served 7/28/10 02/14/2011 Motion (8:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Winslow, George) Result: No Action 01/14/2011 Returned Mail 01/04/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment Reserved (reclosed 2/17/11) 01/04/2011 Notice of Hearing 2/14/11 @ 8am 11/29/2010 Notice of Change of Address 10/22/2010 Order for Income Deduction 10/19/2010 Petition/Motion (1:00 PM) (Magistrate Winslow, George) Parties Present Result: Report and Recommendation 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) Pet #2 (Support Guidelines Worksheet) 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) Pet #1 (Supplemental Financial Statement) 10/19/2010 Court Minutes 10/08/2010 Returned Mail 09/20/2010 Order for Non Jury Trial 10/19/10 @ 1pm Rm.540 09/17/2010 Notice for Trial Non-Jury 08/12/2010 Response with Regards to Summons Received Regarding Child Support 06/14/2010 Alias Summons Issued 04/09/2010 Summons Returned Unserved 12/17/2009 Request for Admissions (supplemental support) to 12/17/2009 Petition supplemental for support & other relief (Re-Closed 10/22/10) 12/17/2009 Financial Affidavit 12/17/2009 Certificate of Compliance 12/17/2009 Summons Issued re: supplemental petition for support 11/01/2006 Notice of Change of Address Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS 09/28/2006 HRS673 to Bureau HRS673 to Bureau|HRS673 TO BUREAU Letter|LETTER FILED FROM JUDICIAL ASSISTANT 07/19/2006 Letter Letter|LETTER FILED TO JUDGE RE: CHILD SUPPORT 05/09/2006 Final Judgment Final Judgment|FINAL JUDGMENT PATERNITY RECORDED 05/09/2006 Disposed by Non-Jury Trial Disposed by Non-Jury Trial|DISPOSED BY NON JURY TRIAL 05/09/2006 Order for Income Deduction Order for Income Deduction|ORDER FOR INCOME DEDUCTION 05/08/2006 HRS673 to Bureau HRS673 to Bureau|HRS673 TO BUREAU 04/28/2006 Court Minutes Court Minutes|MINUTES HEARING 04/28/2006 Affidavit Affidavit|STATE CASE REGISTRY INFORMATION 04/28/2006 Affidavit Affidavit|FINAN CIAL STATEMENT 04/28/2006 Status Hearing (8:00 AM) (Judicial Officers Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Roche, Renee A) 04/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial (8:00 AM) (Judicial Officers Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Roche, Renee A) 03/29/2006 Request to Produce Request to Produce|REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO 03/29/2006 Notice for Trial Notice for Trial|NOTICE FOR NON JURY TRIAL 03/29/2006 Notice of Hearing Notice of Hearing|NOTICE OF HEARING * 04/28/2006 08:00 A.M. 03/29/2006 Order for Non Jury Trial Order for Non Jury Trial|ORDER FOR NON JURY TRIAL [04/28/2006] 08:00 A.M. 03/28/2006 Notice of Filing HLA Tissue Typing Notice of Filing HLA Tissue Typing|NOTICE FILING HLA TISSUE TYPING 03/28/2006 Request for Admissions Request for Admissions |REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO 02/09/2006 Notice Notice|NTS OF PARENTAGE TESTING APPOINTMENT 03/01/06 @ 1:20 P.M. 01/10/2006 HRS673 to Bureau HRS673 to Bureau|HRS673 TO BUREAU 01/05/2006 Child Support Information Sheet Child Support Information Sheet|CHILD SUPPORT INFORMATION SHEET 01/05/2006 Child Support Information Sheet Child Support Information Sheet|CHILD SUPPORT INFORMATION SHEET 01/05/2006 Financial Affidavit Financial Affidavit|SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT 01/05/2006 Court Minutes Court Minutes|MINUTES HEARING 01/05/2006 Non-Jury Trial (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officers Roche, Renee A, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated) 01/05/2006 Status Hearing (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officers Roche, Renee A, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated, Deactivated) 12/06/2005 Notice for Trial Notice for Trial|NOTICE FOR NON JURY TRIAL 12/06/2005 Request to Produce Request to Produce|REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO 12/06/2005 Order for Non Jury Trial Order for Non Jury Trial|ORDER FOR NON JURY TRIAL [01/05/2006] 09:00 A.M. 12/06/2005 Notice of Hearing Notice of Hearing|NOTICE OF HEARING * 01/05/2006 09:00 A.M. 12/05/2005 Answer Answer|ANSWER 10/31/2005 Summons Returned Summons Returned|SUMMONS SERVED [10/10/2005] 10/31/2005 Summons Returned Summons Returned|SUMMONS SERVED [10/10/2005] 10/27/2005 Answer Denying Allegations Answer Denying Allegations|ANSWER DENYING ALLEGATIONS 08/29/2005 Initial Judge Assigned Initial Judge Assigned|INITIAL JUDGE ASSIGNED EVANS, ROBERT M 42 08/29/2005 Petition Petition|PETITION - DOR 08/29/2005 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet|CIVIL COVER SHEET FILED 08/29/2005 Notice of Social Security Notice of Social Security|NOTICE OF SOCIAL SECURITY 08/29/2005 Financial Affidavit Financial Affidavit|FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT 08/29/2005 Certificate of Compliance Certificate of Compliance|CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 08/29/2005 Request for Admissions Request for Admissions |REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO 08/29/2005 Summons Issued Summons Issued|SUMMONS ISSUED Financial Information Petitioner SHAW, SHEILA JOCELYN Total Financial Assessment 50.00 Total Payments and Credits 0.00 Balance Due as of 11/14/2012 50.00 09 Register of Actions Case No. 2010-DR-000170-O SHAW, SHEILA JOCELYN KARENA vs. WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN § § § § § § § Case Type: Child Support DOR Date Filed: 01/06/2010 Location: Div 42 Judicial Officer: Evans, Robert M Uniform Case Number: 482010DR000170A001OX Related Case Information Related Cases 2011-DR-006367-O (Child Support) Party Information Petitioner SHAW, SHEILA JOCELYN KARENA Lead Attorneys ANA ELENA (LIMITED) TANGEL RODRIGUEZ, Esquire Retained 407-849-1133(W) Respondent WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN Events & Orders of the Court DISPOSITIONS 03/24/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & Order (Judicial Officer: Evans, Robert M) Comment (Final Order on Motion to Set Arrears) 01/12/2011 Final Order (Judicial Officer: Evans, Robert M) Comment (on Withdrawal of Motion to Set Reserved Arrears) 04/06/2010 Final Judgment (Judicial Officer: Roche, Renee A) Comment (for Support Recorded) OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS 08/02/2012 Answer w/att (Unsigned) 05/07/2012 Motion FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 05/07/2012 Birth Certificate as to Female Child 04/23/2012 Summons Returned Unserved 04/12/2012 Summons Issued 04/11/2012 Request for Admissions (Support) 04/11/2012 Petition/Motion for Modification 04/11/2012 Civil Cover Sheet 04/02/2012 Motion for writ of habeas corpus contesting custody order w/att 04/02/2012 Notice of Change of Address 11/14/2011 Notice of Change of Address 03/21/2011 Motion (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Winslow, George) Result: Report and Recommendation 03/21/2011 Court Minutes 03/15/2011 Returned Mail 03/02/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment and Notice of Hearing on 3/21/11 @ 1:30pm in Rm 540 (Re-Closed 03/24/11) 03/01/2011 Civil Cover Sheet 01/10/2011 Motion (8:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Winslow, George) Result: No Action 12/02/2010 Notice of Hearing on 1/10/11 @ 8am 12/01/2010 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment Reserved (Re-Closed 01/12/11) 12/01/2010 Civil Cover Sheet 11/29/2010 Notice of Change of Address 04/06/2010 Order for Income Deduction 03/31/2010 Petition/Motion (8:00 AM) () Parties Present Result: Report and Recommendation 03/31/2010 Supplemental Financial Statement 03/31/2010 Support Guidelines Worksheet 03/31/2010 Child Support Information Sheet 03/31/2010 Child Support Information Sheet 03/31/2010 Court Minutes 02/12/2010 Order for Non Jury Trial 3/31/10 @ 8am Rm.540 02/12/2010 Order for Non Jury Trial 3/31/10 @ 8am Rm.540 02/10/2010 Notice for Trial Non Jury 02/04/2010 Summons Returned Served 1/16/10 01/28/2010 Answer w/att 01/06/2010 Summons Issued 01/06/2010 Civil Cover Sheet 01/06/2010 Petition FOR SUPPORT AND OTHER RELIEF 01/06/2010 Request for Admissions 01/06/2010 Financial Affidavit 01/06/2010 Certificate of Compliance Financial Information Respondent WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN Total Financial Assessment 15.00 Total Payments and Credits 15.00 Balance Due as of 11/14/2012 0.00 05/20/2010 Transaction Assessment 15.00 05/20/2010 Counter Payment Receipt # DR-2010-15610 WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN (15.00)