http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/02/httpswwwfloridabarorgdivcomjnjnjournal0.html?m=1
--- On Tue, 5/30/17, Sheila Shaw
wrote:
> From: Sheila Shaw
> Subject: State employee(s) misconduct/Harassment/False Statements and Fraud CONTINUING AGGRAVATED WHITE COLLAR CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR BY DEPARTMENTAL EMPLOYEE INCLUDING SUSPECTED STALKING.9457320158 (RFA CASE NUMBER 1143172973) PRIOR COMPLAINT NOTICE WAS DIRECTED TO THE REGIONAL OFFICE AS WELL AS THE OFFICE OF THE FL OIG
cc: THIS INCIDENT BEEN REPORTED TO THE INSPECTOR GENERAL REGARDING FRAUD, MISUSE OF OFFICE AND FALSE STATEMENTS
Fwd: CPS may only place founded reports on the state's central registry of child abuse and neglect
(FLORIDA DEPTMENT CHILDREN AND FAMILIES DCF- REGIONAL AND PIG EMPLOYEES WERE MADE AWARE AND DID NOT RESPOND TO THE FRAUDS, DID NOT COMPLY WITH PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS.
To: Maxine_McGregor@dcf.state.fl.us, Karlene_Cole-Palmer@dcf.state.fl.us, Childrens Inspector ,
> To: lfarmer@flcertificationboard.orgSubjectLine
> Cc: "county ombudsman"
> Date: Tuesday, May 30, 2017, 9:08 AM
> Re: Fraud. Rule 3.3 Candor Toward The
> Tribunal - Comment [1] This Rule governs the conduct of a
> lawyer who is representing a client in the proceedings of a
> tribunal. See Rule 1.0(m) for the definition of "tribunal."
> It also applies when the lawyer is representing a client in
> an ancillary proceeding conducted pursuant to the
> tribunal’s adjudicative authority, such as a deposition.
> Thus, for example, paragraph (a)(3) requires a lawyer to
> take reasonable remedial measures if the lawyer comes to
> know that a client who is testifying in a deposition has
> offered evidence that is false. [2] This Rule sets forth
> the special duties of lawyers as officers of the court to
> avoid conduct that undermines the integrity of the
> adjudicative process. A lawyer acting as an advocate in an
> adjudicative proceeding has an obligation to present the
> client's case with persuasive force. Performance of that
> duty while maintaining confidences of the client, however,
> is qualified by the advocate's duty of candor to the
> tribunal. Consequently, although a lawyer in an adversary
> proceeding is not required to present an impartial
> exposition of the law or to vouch for the evidence submitted
> in a cause, the lawyer must not allow the tribunal to be
> misled by false statements of law or fact or evidence that
> the lawyer knows to be false."
>
>
> State emoloyee misconduct: Fw:
> ADMINISTRATIVE 92-1; In all family law cases in which
> a trial is anticipated, the attorney shall submit a notice
> that the cause is at issue.- intentional omissions;
>
>
>
>
> The following complaint was forwarded
> to the Florida Bar ACAP regarding employee/attorney frauds,
> deceit, ethnic biased incidents while participating in The
> Dept Revenue Child Support, DO Department Children and
> Families Medicaid and TANF programs (The Department of
> Revenue has implemented an administrative process to
> establish child support orders, and this process includes
> specific procedures designed to protect due process and
> ensure parents’ access to the court system. While this
> process has the potential to improve program outcomes, it
> has not yet produced the expected number of support
> orders. While the process is somewhat faster than
> establishing orders through the courts, it takes an average
> of over seven months to complete, and costs for
> administrative hearings are higher than those for judicial
> hearings
>
> http://www.oppaga.state.fl.us/Summary.aspx?reportNum=c)
>
>
> 9457320158 (RFA CASE NUMBER 1143172973)
> insurance covering dental/medical Dr. Obeori & Dr.Nau
> (Michyl, Isis).
>
> cc:
>
>
> PART ONE (See Page 1, PART ONE -
> Complainant Information.):
> Complaint Details
> Legal Cause and Tortious Injury (As a
> result of the fraudulent acts/omissions, and deceit by
> attorney and departmental employee whereas deprivation of
> rights involved those rights of the minors and the natural
> parent and mother)
> *FRAUD ON THE COURT TO COMMENCE
> PROCEEDINGS
> On the part of the attorney herein and
> afore mentioned in proceedings:
> Duty to report misconduct; code of
> conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228
> THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651
> EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON
> THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA JOCELYN SHAW PARTY TO THE
> COMPLAINT:
> AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S)
> PART TWO (See Page 1, PART TWO -
> Attorney Information
> FLORIDA BAR MEMBER(S):
> SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221
> WAYNE STARR
> ANTHONY SOS
> GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ
> 667498
> AMANDA ETZKORN 25942
> CEDRIC TIBON
> DORIS MACKEY GAL-
> PART T H R E E (See Page 1, PART T H R
> E E - Facts/Allegations.): The specific thing or things I am
> complaining about are: (attach additional sheets as
> necessary)
> "Fraud. Rule 3.3 Candor Toward The
> Tribunal - Comment [1] This Rule governs the conduct of a
> lawyer who is representing a client in the proceedings of a
> tribunal. See Rule 1.0(m) for the definition of "tribunal."
> It also applies when the lawyer is representing a client in
> an ancillary proceeding conducted pursuant to the
> tribunal’s adjudicative authority, such as a deposition.
> Thus, for example, paragraph (a)(3) requires a lawyer to
> take reasonable remedial measures if the lawyer comes to
> know that a client who is testifying in a deposition has
> offered evidence that is false. [2] This Rule sets forth
> the special duties of lawyers as officers of the court to
> avoid conduct that undermines the integrity of the
> adjudicative process. A lawyer acting as an advocate in an
> adjudicative proceeding has an obligation to present the
> client's case with persuasive force. Performance of that
> duty while maintaining confidences of the client, however,
> is qualified by the advocate's duty of candor to the
> tribunal. Consequently, although a lawyer in an adversary
> proceeding is not required to present an impartial
> exposition of the law or to vouch for the evidence submitted
> in a cause, the lawyer must not allow the tribunal to be
> misled by false statements of law or fact or evidence that
> the lawyer knows to be false."
> State employee misconduct which
> resulted in material injuries and legal causation: *Police
> stalking.
> Conspired with FL DCF STATE EMPLOYEE
> EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT, CPI NUMBER 5617503201
> http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/?m=1
> 9457320158 (RFA CASE NUMBER 1143172973)
> insurance covering dental/medical Dr. Obeori & Dr.Nau
> (Michyl, Isis)
> http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/02/httpflcertificationboardorg.html?m=1
> Firm associated with complaint.
> Interstate stalking and trespassing related to a divorcee
> case.
> Hershkowitz Russell S Attorney
> : Fw: ADMINISTRATIVE 92-1; In
> all family law cases in which a trial is anticipated, the
> attorney shall submit a notice that the cause is at issue.-
> intentional omissions; w: Mr. Williams is refusing
> visitation with the minor contrary to the oral & written
> child visitation with Atty Wayne Starr at the last hearing
> 8/30/2011- subsequent modification petitions have been
> submitted resulting in excuses by court administration,
> lastly stating a parental responsibility packet is needed-
> THERE IS NO PRESUMPTIVE FATHERHOOD STATUE APPLICABLE, UNWED
> AT BIRTH AND CISTODY BTW 2007 THRU 2011 WAS WITH THE
> MOTHERHOOD. THERE IS NO CHANCE OF RESOLUTION OF ANY INTIMATE
> PARTNER RELATIONSHIP & WILLIAMS AND SEVERAL OF HIS
> FAMILY TIES HAVE REPEATED ENGAGED IN OFFENSIVE BEHAVIOURS
> AND PROPERTY THEFTS MONETARY CLAIMS PRECEEDING THE ACTUAL
> JUDGEMENT FOR SUPPORT Fw: Court Administration employee
> misconduct/judicial misconduct- unconscionable delays &
> biased proceedings, concealed concurtent criminal proceeding
> involving Jarrid Williams 2/2011/ continuing domestic
> violence& abuse of the child support order by law
> enforcement personnel , domestic violence
> > To: info@idvaac.org
> > Cc: "judicial misconduct" ,
> "judicial misconduct" ,
> "judicial misconduct" ,
> "judicial misconduct" ,
> "judicial misconduct" ,
> "judicial misconduct" ,
> "judicial misconduct" ,
> "judicial misconduct" ,
> "judicial misconduct" ,
> "judicial misconduct" ,
> "judicial misconduct" ,
> "judicial misconduct" ,
> "judicial misconduct" ,
> "judicial misconduct" ,
> "judicial misconduct" ,
> "judicial" ,
> "Judicial" ,
> "Judicial Committee"
> > Date: Friday, March 17, 2017, 8:25
> PM
> omissions:
> unconsolidated cases/related cases
> whereas information therein would substantially affect those
> involved such as that of concurrent criminal nonsupport
> proceedings against the plaintiff/paternal fathers to case-
> as indicative on the Lidia Gardner Clerk of Court Registries
>
> http://icpcstatepages.org/florida/criminalbackground/
> 39.0138 Criminal history and other records
> checks; limit on placement of a child— (1) The
> department shall conduct a records check through the State
> Automated Child Welfare Information System (SACWIS) and a
> local and statewide criminal history records check on all
> persons, including parents, being considered by the
> department for placement of a child under this chapter,
> including all non-relative placement decisions, and all
> members of the household, 12 years of age and older, of the
> person being considered. For purposes of this section, a
> criminal history records check may include, but is not
> limited to, submission of fingerprints to the Department of
> Law Enforcement for processing and forwarding to the Federal
> Bureau of Investigation for state and national criminal
> history information, and local criminal records checks
> through local law enforcement agencies of all household
> members 18 years of age and older and other visitors to the
> home. An out-of-state criminal history records check must be
> initiated for any person 18 years of age or older who
> resided in another state if that state allows the release of
> such records. The department shall establish by rule
> standards for evaluating any information contained in the
> automated system relating to a person who must be screened
> for purposes of making a placement decision.
> 1. Chapter 560, relating to the Money Transmitters’
> Code. 2. Chapter 812, relating to theft, robbery, and
> related crimes. 3. Chapter 815, relating to
> computer-related crimes. 4. Chapter 817, relating to
> fraudulent practices. 5. Chapter 825, relating to abuse,
> neglect, and exploitation of elderly persons and disabled
> adults. 6. Chapter 831, relating to forgery and
> counterfeiting. 7. Chapter 832, relating to the issuance
> of worthless checks and drafts. 8. Chapter 838, relating
> to bribery and misuse of public office. 9. Chapter 839,
> relating to offenses by public officers and employees.
> 10. Chapter 895, relating to offenses concerning
> racketeering and illegal debts. 11. Chapter 896, relating
> to offenses related to financial transactions. (b) A
> felony offense that is committed with intent to defraud or
> that involves a conspiracy to defraud. (c) A felony
> offense that is committed with intent to temporarily or
> permanently deprive a person of his or her property or that
> involves a conspiracy to temporarily or permanently deprive
> a person of his or her property. (d) A felony offense that
> involves or results in the commission of fraud or deceit
> upon a person or that involves a conspiracy to commit fraud
> or deceit upon a person. (4) As used in this section,
> “aggravated white collar crime” means engaging in at
> least two white collar crimes that have the same or similar
> intents, results, accomplices, victims, or methods of
> commission, or that are otherwise interrelated by
> distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated
> incidents, provided that at least one of such crimes
> occurred after the effective date of this act. (5) Any
> person who commits an aggravated white collar crime as
> defined in this section and in so doing either:
> (a) Victimizes 10 or more elderly persons, as defined in
> s. 825.101; (b) Victimizes 20 or more persons, as defined
> in s. 1.01; or (c) Victimizes the State of Florida, any
> state agency, any of the state’s political subdivisions,
> or any agency of the state’s political subdivisions, and
> thereby obtains or attempts to obtain $50,000 or more,
> commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided
> in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
> *concurrent court proceedings FL DCF
> KNEW ABOUT :NINTH DISTRICT HISTORICAL DATA DIV 38/42
> PRECEEDING CLAIM BY DCF CPI FELICIA HANDLEY 2005DR14270
> 08-24-2004 Petition for paternity entered Service denied
> 09-24-2004 Petition to establish paternity denied Respondent
> petitioned to dismiss paternity 11-08-2004 05-05-2006 Final
> judgment granted on paternity 10-19-2010 Final judgment for
> child support entered 10-22-2010 Order for income deduction
> 11-29-2010 Notice of change of address 12-28-2010 Petition
> heard to establish child support 01-14-2011 Returned mail
> 01-04-2011 Motion to set arrears entered 01-04-2011 Notice
> and hearing 02-14-2011 Hearing to set arrears 01/28/2011
> Plaintiff petitions for the need for custody denied
> 02/04/2011
> THE SPECIFIC THING OR THINGS I AM
> COMPLAINING ABOUT ARE:
> 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242). "Color of
> law" simply means that the person doing the act is using
> power given to him or her by a governmental agency (local,
> State, or Federal). A law enforcement officer acts "under
> color of law" even if he or she is exceeding his or her
> rightful power.
> THAT ON THE ONSET OF PROCEEDINGS DATED
> 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA SHAW, AS THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE
> DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION 7, ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT:
> Juvenile Division 2000 E.
> Michigan St.Suite 300 Orlando, FL 32806
> PROCEEDINGS (WAIVED NOTICE OF
> OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD TO BE IN WRITING- WAIVED BY THE
> JUDGE) WERE COMMENCED WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE
> PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE HISTORICAL DATA AND CONCURRENT
> CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS, AND HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS
> CONCURRENTLY PUBLISHED IN DIVISION 42 COURT, VIA CLERK OF
> THE ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE
> RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE RISS DATABASE, THE
> DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR ACCOUNTS OF
> INTERAGENCY ACCESS WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.
> THE COMPLAINANT MAKES REFERENCE THAT
> THE ATTORNEY’S, WITH KNOWLEDGE, ACTED IN A DECEITFUL
> MANNER, NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF FRAUD
> RELATIVE TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS.
> *Duty to report misconduct; code of
> conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228
> THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER
> ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE,
> FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA
> JOCELYN SHAW
> PARTY TO THE COMPLAINT:
> AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S)
> 1. Chapter 560, relating to the Money
> Transmitters’ Code.
> 2. Chapter 812, relating to theft,
> robbery, and related crimes.
> 3. Chapter 815, relating to
> computer-related crimes.
> 4. Chapter 817, relating to
> fraudulent practices.
> 5. Chapter 825, relating to abuse,
> neglect, and exploitation of elderly persons and disabled
> adults.
> 6. Chapter 831, relating to forgery
> and counterfeiting.
> 7. Chapter 832, relating to the
> issuance of worthless checks and drafts.
> 8. Chapter 838, relating to bribery
> and misuse of public office.
> 9. Chapter 839, relating to offenses
> by public officers and employees.
> 10. Chapter 895, relating to offenses
> concerning racketeering and illegal debts.
> 11. Chapter 896, relating to offenses
> related to financial transactions.
> (b) A felony offense that is
> committed with intent to defraud or that involves a
> conspiracy to defraud.
> (c) A felony offense that is
> committed with intent to temporarily or permanently deprive
> a person of his or her property or that involves a
> conspiracy to temporarily or permanently deprive a person of
> his or her property.
> (d) A felony offense that involves or
> results in the commission of fraud or deceit upon a person
> or that involves a conspiracy to commit fraud or deceit upon
> a person.
> (4) As used in this section,
> “aggravated white collar crime” means engaging in at
> least two white collar crimes that have the same or similar
> intents, results, accomplices, victims, or methods of
> commission, or that are otherwise interrelated by
> distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated
> incidents, provided that at least one of such crimes
> occurred after the effective date of this act.
> (5) Any person who commits an
> aggravated white collar crime as defined in this section and
> in so doing either:
> (a) Victimizes 10 or more elderly
> persons, as defined in s. 825.101;
> (b) Victimizes 20 or more persons, as
> defined in s. 1.01; or
> (c) Victimizes the State of Florida,
> any state agency, any of the state’s political
> subdivisions, or any agency of the state’s political
> subdivisions,
> and thereby obtains or attempts to
> obtain $50,000 or more, commits a felony of the first
> degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or
> s. 775.084.
> ACAP BAR COMPLAINT DETAILS/PROFESSIONAL
> STANDARDS VIOLATIONS. Fw: EMPLOYEE MISCOND KUCT (hate
> crimes, continuing domestic violence after breaking up with
> Williams) CF180-4 ( per your publication, the SCOPE of
> guidelines, goverance of employee ethical and professional
> conduct states: “Fraud” means to commit an
> intentional violation of law or a deliberate
> misrepresentation or concealment so as to secure unfair or
> unlawful financial or personal gain.) In this case
> whereas fraud in the manner and form constituting DOMESTIC
> VIOLENCE, PUBLIC OFFICER/ATTORNEY DECEIT, COLLUSION, that
> he/she did KNOWINGLY WITH INTENT TO COMMIT AGGRAVATED
> (COMPOUNDED) SEMITIC HATE, ETHNICALLY BIASED CRIMINAL TORTS,
> DURESS AND EMOTIONAL ABUSE AND ALIENATION TO THE MOTHER WHO
> WAS ALREADY A VICTIM OF ABUSE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN THE
> MANNER AND FORMS OF EXINTIMATE PARTNER & FAMILY
> VIOLENCE, PERSONALITY TORTS AND FRAUD TO COMMENCE
> PROCEEDINGS, AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RELATED TO PRECEEDING
> ASCERTAINMENT PURSUITS THROUGH ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL
> ACTIONS WHICH WERE INTENTIONALLY AND "SELECTIVELY" BIASED IN
> APPLICATION OF THE LAWS BOTH FEDERAL AND STATE STATUTORY
> APPLICATION TO CHILD CUSTODY, CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION,
> RECOVERY AND DISBURSEMENT, WITH AN ACT OF VIOLENCE OCCURRING
> FEBRUARY 4TH 2011 IN THE ABATEMENT OF CHILD DUPPORT FROM THE
> PRECEEDING MONTH OF COLLECTION JANUARY 2011, AFTER JUDGEMENT
> REIDERED ON DECEMBER 22ND, 2010 LESS THAN 60(SIXTY DAYS)
> THAT EMPLOYEE KNOWLEDGE THRU THE RISS INFORMATION SHARING
> SYSTEM PROMPTED MALICIOUS, RETALIATORY STATEMENT TO INTERFER
> WITH FL SDU DISBURSEMENT, REVERSING THE JANUARY PAYMENT
> AFTER FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDING ONSET AGAIN AFTER AN
> EARLY DISMISSAL ON JANUARY 28TH, 2011, BOTH OF WHICH INITIAL
> CLAIM WERE OMITTED DUE TO EMPLOYEE FRAUD/MISCONDUCT
>
>
>
>
>
http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/02/httpswwwfloridabarorgdivcomjnjnjournal0.html?m=1
--- On Tue, 5/30/17, Sheila Shaw 
No comments:
Post a Comment