Thursday, 15 February 2018

Civil fraud -https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.stradley.com/~/media/Files/ResourcesLanding/Publications/1993/03/Fraud%2520Litigation%2520in%2520Pennsylvania/Files/prk-fraud/FileAttachment/prk-fraud.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiN-aCR26fZAhVBtlkKHY2dDL0QFjAAegQIExAB&usg=AOvVaw3ByO9NtzrPtHlNtP93-CmA


Notwithstanding the particularity requirement, malice, intent, knowledge and
other conditions of the mind may be averred generally. Pa.R.C.P. 1019(b).
B. VARIOUS THEORIES OF FRAUD UNDER STATE LAW
1. General Definition
Fraud embraces a wide variety of actionable wrongs and is accomplished through
a wide variety of conduct. See Matter of Estate of Evasew, 526 Pa. 98, 584 A.2d 910 (1990

Generally, fraud is practiced when there is a deception of another to his damage. 16 P.L.E.
Fraud § 1 (1959). Fraud consists of anything calculated to deceive, whether by single act or
combination, or by suppression of truth, or a suggestion of what is false, either by direct
falsehood or by innuendo, by speech or sentence, word of mouth, or look or gesture, and may be
made up by any artifice by which a person is deceived to his disadvantage. Summ. Pa. Jur. 2d
Torts § 16:1 (1991).
2. Traditional Fraud
Under Pennsylvania law the following elements must be pled and proven in an
action to establish a claim for common law fraud:
(1) a misrepresentation,
(2) a fraudulent utterance thereof,
(3) an intention by the maker that the recipient will thereby be induced to act,
(4) justifiable reliance by the recipient upon the misrepresentation, and
(5) damages to the recipient as the proximate result.

A representation is fraudulently uttered if the maker knows of its falsity when
uttering it, or, in other words, knows the matter to be otherwise than as represented. Neuman v.
Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co., 356 Pa. 442, 51 A.2d 759 (1947); Woodward v.
Dietrich, 378 Pa. Super. 111, 548 A.2d 301 (1988).
It is unnecessary that the person defrauded be the one who was specifically
intended by the maker of the misrepresentation to rely thereon, so long as that person’s reliance
was reasonably foreseeable

3. Reckless Misrepresentations
The reckless assertion of a fact in conscious ignorance of its truth or falsity
amounts to actionable fraud. Rodgers v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 803 F. Supp.
1025 (M.D. Pa. 1992), aff’d 998 F.2d 1004 (3d Cir. 1993); In re Berringer, 125 B.R. 444 (W.D.
Pa. 1991); Cashdollar v. Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh, 406 Pa. Super. ,606, 595 A.2d ,70 (1991);
Adams v. Euliano, 299 Pa. Super. 348, 445 A.2d 788 (1982).
4. Innocent Misrepresentations
Fraud may be established even where there is an innocently made
misrepresentation so long as it relates to a matter material to the transaction involved. LaCourse
v. Kiesel, 366 Pa. 385, 77 A.2d 877 (1951); Boyle v. Odell, 413 Pa. Super. 562, 605 A.2d 1260
(1992). “If the misrepresentation is innocently made, then it is actionable only if it relates to a
matter material to the transaction involved; while if the misrepresentation is knowingly made, or
-involves a non-privileged failure to disclose, materiality is not requisite to the action.” Smith v.
Renaut, 387 Pa. Super. 299, 564 A.2d 188 (1989); Mancini v. Morrow, 312 Pa. Super. 192, 458
A.2d 580 (1983). Pleading the materiality of the misrepresentation substitutes for pleading the
fraudulent utterance thereof.
5. Concealment
Fraudulent concealment is simply a type of fraudulent misrepresentation, the
concealment substituting for false words. Mancini v. Morrow, 312 Pa. Super. 192, 458 A.2d 580
(1983) (“active concealment of defects known to be material to a purchaser is legally equivalent
to affirmative misrepresentation”) (citations omitted) (sellers of house fraudulently concealed

6. Silence
Mere silence is not fraud if there is no duty to speak. Wilson v. Donegal Mutual
Insurance Co., 410 Pa. Super. 31, 598 A.2d 1310 (1991); Smith v. Renaut, 387 Pa. Super. 299,
564 A.2d 188 (1989). An exception to the rule that mere silence is not fraud exists when
circumstances impose upon a person the duty to speak and he deliberately remains silent. Scaife
Co. v. Rockwell-Standard Corp., 446 Pa. 280, 285 A.2d 451 (1971), cert. denied, 407 U.S. 920
(1972).
To constitute actionable fraud, the nondisclosure of information must be
intentional and must relate to information which is material to the transaction. Roberts v. Estate
of Barbagallo, 366 Pa. Super. 559, 531 A.2d 1125 (1987). Where the omitted information is not
material to the transaction, there is no fraud. Sevin v. Kelshaw, 417 Pa. Super. 1, 611 A.2d
1232 (1992). Of course, where a party knows of a dangerous and latent defect, such information
is material and he has an affirmative duty to disclose that information. Quashnock v. Frost, 299
Pa. Super. 9, 445 A.2d 121 (1982) (termite infestation of house). However, where the alleged
defects are neither dangerous nor latent, but, in fact, are easily discoverable, there is no duty to
speak. Gozon v. Henderson-Dewey & Associates, Inc., 312 Pa. Super. 242, 458 A.2d 605 (1983)
(cracks in a swimming pool).

Sunday, 14 January 2018

Barbara Tanner Jones & Tangel-Rodriguez & Associates 222 Weber St, Orlando, FL 32803 Case# 482005DR014270A001OX) THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300

Atty deceit-Taner withdrew from an OCSE FL DEPT REV CASE WITH COMMENTS ENTERED ON 2/15/2011 that arrears were questionable when in fact departmental records and FL 9TH DISTRICT LIDIA GARNER CLERK OF COURT RECORDS MANAGEMENT HISTORICAL DATA CONTAINED ADVERSE ACCOUNTS OF ANY QUESTIONABLE CHILD SUPPORT IN FACT LEGALLY STATED AND IN ACCORD WITH TITLE 42 SECTIONS 654,655,657 social security child support stipulations; Taner withdrew after fraud to commence proceedings on 2/03/2011 when FELICIA HANDLEY SENT A DEPT EMAIL STATING THE MINOR TO CASE WAS MISSING A FALSE STATEMENT MADE 1 DAY PRIOR TO FL DEPT CHILD SUPPORT UNIT WAS TOLD TO ABATE OR IT WAS DOCUMENTED THA ABATED CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT MADE BY GONZALEZ WAS IN EFFECT PRIOR TO A TEMPORARY ORDER FOR MODIFICATION OF CUSTODY WAS ISSUED THRU THE DEPENDENCY COURT 9TH DISTRICT A MODIFICATION BASED ON FRAUD. A SUBSEQUENT PETITION TO THE 9TH DISTRICT FAMILY COURT AS INSTRUCTED WHERE FOLLOWUP PETITIONS WERE TO BE MADE-Petition to vacate the judgement was denied after the judicial magistrate held the petition, A MOCKERY OF PRIOR RESERVED ACTIONS BY THE PRECEEDING JUDICIAL MAGISTRATES AND HEARING OFFICERS, Roche and George Winslow, a repetited pattern of reserving a current child support order had preceeding the judgement made 12/22/2010-
a current support order was finally issued on Michyl Shaw's case. Professional Standards Complaint (s)- Fw: Atty Deceit Complaint/Dependency Fraud in the court incidents ( Barbara Tanner Jones- Tangel-Rodriguez & Associates 222 Weber St, Orlando, FL 32803 Case# 482005DR014270A001OX) withdrew on February 15th, 2011 representation-(Where a lawyer learns of another lawyer’s misconduct in the course of representing her client, and the information about the misconduct constitutes a confidence or secret within the meaning of Rule 1.6, that Rule prohibits her reporting it without the client’s consent. If, after having been made fully aware of any possible adverse consequences for his ultimate recovery...) AFTER A FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS WAS INITIATED BY A FL DCF CPI- TEMPORARY MODIFICATION WAS REQUESTED TO ABATE NOT ONLY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT IN A CURRENT ORDER ISSUES DECEMBER 22ND, 2010-TO ABATE LEGAL REPRESENTATION FROM THE GO DEPT OF REVENUE BECAUSE THE DCF ATTORNEYS HAD NO INTENTION OF CONSOLIDATING EXISTING FAMILY LAW CASES-RELATED CASES IN ORDER TO DEFRAUD THE COURT -IN WHICH THE INITIAL ALLEGATION WAS NEVER HEARD DURING PROCEEDINGS BETWEEN FEBRUARY 2011 THROUGH AUGUST 2011



Public policy/White Collar Criminal Acts/Attorney Misconduct involving racial profiling & hate group harassment


FL CPI 5617503201

False reporting that she knew would be classified as a violent crime, would involve subsequent legal causation including the  P.R.O.T.E.C.T. Act which is a PROSECUTORIAL TOOL INVESTIGATION AND MONITORING COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE CHILDREN AND THE DADS.

THAT WAS FEBRUARY OF 2011.
ALTHOUGH THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL WITHIN THE FLORIDA DCF CONFIRMED NO PARTICIPATION FROM FL DCF AGENTS (OFFICIALLY) OCCURRED AFTER THE ADJUDICATED CASE CLOSURE AS OF AUGUST 2011, HARASSMENT AND DEFAMATION CONTINUED AND ADDITIONAL FABRICATIONS BY PUBLIC OFFICERS CONTINUED TO EXONERATE HANDLEY'S FALSE MISSING CHILDREN'S/KIDNAPPING "STATEMENT" NOT CRIMINAL CHARGES SHE WROTE UP ON A GOVERNMENT OFFICE FORM AND DOCUMENT "DEPENDENCY ARRAIGNMENT " FORM, MISLEADING OTHERS THAT A CRIMINAL ARRAIGNMENT HAD ENSUED OR THAT I WAS INVOLVED IN A CRIME AGAINST CHILDREN CHARGE. FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS, INTENTIONAL ATTORNEY DECEIT FOR NONDISCLOSURE OF THE FIRST PAGE INCLUDING THESE FRAUDULENT STATEMENTS TO THE JUDGE, CONTINUING GENDER VIOLENCE/EXINTIMATE PARTNER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INVOLVING THE SAME PARTIES IN CONCURRENT FAMILY LAW CASES IN THE SAME NINTH DISTRICT COURTS ANOTHER DIVISIONS, PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING ALL PARTIES WERE ONGOING IN DIVISIONS 7 & 38/42.
ON THE PUBLIC CLERK OF COURT REGISTRIES AND FL DEPR REVENUE ATTY HISTORICAL DATA, INTENTIONALLY UNCONSOLIDATED.

https://goo.gl/9U5P5k

There are circumstances where failure to make a disclosure is the equivalent of an affirmative misrepresentation. The obligation prescribed in Rule 1.2(d) not to counsel a client to commit or assist the client in committing a fraud applies in litigation. Regarding compliance with Rule 1.2(d), see the Comment to that Rule. See also the Comment to Rule 8.4(b).


http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/06/9457320158-rfa-case-number-1143172973.html?m=1

After WHICH a number of harassing incidents and false claims were made during self help legal filings, petitions and online computer research, online filing and general use related to human rights including employment, academic and correspondence with other family members.


It is a crime for one or more persons acting under color of law willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive another person of any right protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. (18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242)


Here I posted a document entitled ORDER OF ARRAIGNMENT FOR JUVENILE DEPENDENCY HEARING in the foregoing link, whereas the CPI representing FL DCF CHILD PROTECTION AND CHILDREN'S LEGAL SERVICES alleged my children were missing - implying that they were at some point in the custody of someone other than their mother who was in family court proceedings against the paternal dads, who which by the way she kept making up excuses to call the dads and temporary allow them custody despite them being adverse court adversaries.
Such as on January 27th, 2011 Felicia Handley, CPI # , made up or fabricated an excuse for an overnight stay with the dads, the proceedings were dismissed by Judge Anthony Johnson on 1/28/2011 ONE DAY PRIOR TO MY DAUGHTERS'S FOURTH BIRTHDAY 01/29/2011.  HARASSMENT OR PERPETUATED DOMESTIC VIOLENCE THRU MISUSE OF OFFICE.
WHAT JUDGE DO YOU KNOW DOES NOT ADDRESS THE ALLEGATION IN HEARINGS HELD BETWEEN FEBRUARY 2011 THRU AUGUST 30TH, 2011- THIS CASE COMMENCED ON FRAUD AND ALL THE ATTORNEYS INVOLVED HAD THE FIRST PAGE OF THE ARRAIGNMENT & NEVER SAID ONE WORD THROUGHOUT THE HEARINGS BUT CONTINUED TO FABRICATE AN EXCUSE INCLUDING QUESTIONING MY MATRICULATION THROUGH EVEREST UNIVERSITY- ORLANDO NORTH - ORLANDO, FLORIDA & CORLLINS UNIVERSITY, STOCKTON, CA.RECENT  MATRICULATED PROGRAMS AT THE TIME OF HER ALLEGATIONS WHICH WERE REPORTED TO EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES DIVISION OF THE US DEPT OF JUSTICE AS A HATE CRIME, GENDER VIOLENCE.
http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/04/fraud-rule-33-candor-toward-tribunal.html
http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/05/cc-judicial-misconduct-judicial_23.html
https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/judicialethics/resources/TPL_jethics_internet.authcheckdam.pdf
HANDLEY KNEW THE PROCEDURE WELL AS IN ANY BAILOR/BAILEE OR DUTY OF CARE - ROUTINE PROCEDURES THEY DO EVERYDAY -AS WELL AS THE DEPENDENCY GAL PARTICIPANTS DORIS MACKEY & DCF ATTYS WHO NEVER CONSOLIDATED RELATED CASES-REQUIRED


PART ONE (See Page 1, PART ONE - Complainant Information.): Complaint Details Legal Cause and Tortious Injury (As a result of the fraudulent acts/omissions, and deceit by attorney and departmental employee whereas deprivation of rights involved those rights of the minors and the natural parent and mother)

*FRAUD ON THE COURT TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS On the part of the attorney herein and afore mentioned in proceedings: Duty to report misconduct; code of conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228

THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300

ON THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA JOCELYN SHAW PARTY TO THE COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S)
PART TWO (See Page 1,

PART TWO -
Attorney Information FLORIDA BAR MEMBER(S): SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS MACKEY GAL-

PART T H R E E (See Page 1, PART T H R E E - Facts/Allegations.): The specific thing or things I am complaining about are: (attach additional sheets as necessary) "Fraud. Rule 3.3 Candor Toward The Tribunal - Comment [1] This Rule governs the conduct of a lawyer who is representing a client in the proceedings of a tribunal. See Rule 1.0(m) for the definition of "tribunal." It also applies when the lawyer is representing a client in an ancillary proceeding conducted pursuant to the tribunal’s adjudicative authority, such as a deposition. Thus, for example, paragraph (a)(3) requires a lawyer to take reasonable remedial measures if the lawyer comes to know that a client who is testifying in a deposition has offered evidence that is false. [2] This Rule sets forth the special duties of lawyers as officers of the court to avoid conduct that undermines the integrity of the adjudicative process. A lawyer acting as an advocate in an adjudicative proceeding has an obligation to present the client's case with persuasive force. Performance of that duty while maintaining confidences of the client, however, is qualified by the advocate's duty of candor to the tribunal. Consequently, although a lawyer in an adversary proceeding is not required to present an impartial exposition of the law or to vouch for the evidence submitted in a cause, the lawyer must not allow the tribunal to be misled by false statements of law or fact or evidence that the lawyer knows to be false." State employee misconduct which resulted in material injuries and legal causation: *Police stalking. Conspired with FL DCF STATE EMPLOYEE EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT, CPI NUMBER 5617503201 http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/?m=1 9457320158 (RFA CASE NUMBER 1143172973) insurance covering dental/medical Dr. Obeori & Dr.Nau (Michyl, Isis) http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/02/httpflcertificationboardorg.html?m=1 Firm associated with complaint. Interstate stalking and trespassing related to a divorcee case. Hershkowitz Russell S Attorney : Fw: ADMINISTRATIVE 92-1; In all family law cases in which a trial is anticipated, the attorney shall submit a notice that the cause is at issue.- intentional omissions; w: Mr. Williams is refusing visitation with the minor contrary to the oral & written child visitation with Atty Wayne Starr at the last hearing 8/30/2011- subsequent modification petitions have been submitted resulting in excuses by court administration, lastly stating a parental responsibility packet is needed- THERE IS NO PRESUMPTIVE FATHERHOOD STATUE APPLICABLE, UNWED AT BIRTH AND CUSTODY BTW 2007 THRU 2011 WAS WITH THE MOTHERHOOD. THERE IS NO CHANCE OF RESOLUTION OF ANY INTIMATE PARTNER RELATIONSHIP & WILLIAMS AND SEVERAL OF HIS FAMILY TIES HAVE REPEATED ENGAGED IN OFFENSIVE BEHAVIOURS AND PROPERTY THEFTS MONETARY CLAIMS PROCEEDING THE ACTUAL JUDGEMENT FOR SUPPORT Fw: Court Administration employee misconduct/judicial misconduct- unconscionable delays & biased proceedings, concealed concurrent criminal proceeding involving Jarrid Williams 2/2011/ continuing domestic violence& abuse of the child support order by law enforcement personnel

Date: Friday, March 17, 2017, 8:25 PM omissions: unconsolidated cases/related cases whereas information therein would substantially affect those involved such as that of concurrent criminal nonsupport proceedings against the plaintiff/paternal fathers to case- as indicative on the Lidia Gardner Clerk of Court Registries http://icpcstatepages.org/florida/criminalbackground/ 39.0138 Criminal history and other records checks; limit on placement of a child— (1) The department shall conduct a records check through the State Automated Child Welfare Information System (SACWIS) and a local and statewide criminal history records check on all persons, including parents, being considered by the department for placement of a child under this chapter, including all non-relative placement decisions, and all members of the household, 12 years of age and older, of the person being considered. For purposes of this section, a criminal history records check may include, but is not limited to, submission of fingerprints to the Department of Law Enforcement for processing and forwarding to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for state and national criminal history information, and local criminal records checks through local law enforcement agencies of all household members 18 years of age and older and other visitors to the home. An out-of-state criminal history records check must be initiated for any person 18 years of age or older who resided in another state if that state allows the release of such records. The department shall establish by rule standards for evaluating any information contained in the automated system relating to a person who must be screened for purposes of making a placement decision. 1. Chapter 560, relating to the Money Transmitters’ Code. 2. Chapter 812, relating to theft, robbery, and related crimes. 3. Chapter 815, relating to computer-related crimes. 4. Chapter 817, relating to fraudulent practices. 5. Chapter 825, relating to abuse, neglect, and exploitation of elderly persons and disabled adults. 6. Chapter 831, relating to forgery and counterfeiting. 7. Chapter 832, relating to the issuance of worthless checks and drafts. 8. Chapter 838, relating to bribery and misuse of public office. 9. Chapter 839, relating to offenses by public officers and employees. 10. Chapter 895, relating to offenses concerning racketeering and illegal debts. 11. Chapter 896, relating to offenses related to financial transactions. (b) A felony offense that is committed with intent to defraud or that involves a conspiracy to defraud. (c) A felony offense that is committed with intent to temporarily or permanently deprive a person of his or her property or that involves a conspiracy to temporarily or permanently deprive a person of his or her property. (d) A felony offense that involves or results in the commission of fraud or deceit upon a person or that involves a conspiracy to commit fraud or deceit upon a person. (4) As used in this section, “aggravated white collar crime” means engaging in at least two white collar crimes that have the same or similar intents, results, accomplices, victims, or methods of commission, or that are otherwise interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated incidents, provided that at least one of such crimes occurred after the effective date of this act. (5) Any person who commits an aggravated white collar crime as defined in this section and in so doing either: (a) Victimizes 10 or more elderly persons, as defined in s. 825.101; (b) Victimizes 20 or more persons, as defined in s. 1.01; or (c) Victimizes the State of Florida, any state agency, any of the state’s political subdivisions, or any agency of the state’s political subdivisions, and thereby obtains or attempts to obtain $50,000 or more, commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. *concurrent court proceedings FL DCF KNEW ABOUT :NINTH DISTRICT HISTORICAL DATA DIV 38/42 PRECEEDING CLAIM BY DCF CPI FELICIA HANDLEY 2005DR14270 08-24-2004 Petition for paternity entered Service denied 09-24-2004 Petition to establish paternity denied Respondent petitioned to dismiss paternity 11-08-2004 05-05-2006 Final judgment granted on paternity 10-19-2010 Final judgment for child support entered 10-22-2010 Order for income deduction 11-29-2010 Notice of change of address 12-28-2010 Petition heard to establish child support 01-14-2011 Returned mail 01-04-2011 Motion to set arrears entered 01-04-2011 Notice and hearing 02-14-2011 Hearing to set arrears 01/28/2011 Plaintiff petitions for the need for custody denied 02/04/2011 THE SPECIFIC THING OR THINGS I AM COMPLAINING ABOUT ARE: 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242). "Color of law" simply means that the person doing the act is using power given to him or her by a governmental agency (local, State, or Federal). A law enforcement officer acts "under color of law" even if he or she is exceeding his or her rightful power. THAT ON THE ONSET OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA SHAW, AS THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION 7, ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT: Juvenile Division 2000 E. Michigan St.Suite 300 Orlando, FL 32806 PROCEEDINGS (WAIVED NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD TO BE IN WRITING- WAIVED BY THE JUDGE) WERE COMMENCED WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE HISTORICAL DATA AND CONCURRENT CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS, AND HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS CONCURRENTLY PUBLISHED IN DIVISION 42 COURT, VIA CLERK OF THE ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE RISS DATABASE, THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR ACCOUNTS OF INTERAGENCY ACCESS WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. THE COMPLAINANT MAKES REFERENCE THAT THE ATTORNEY’S, WITH KNOWLEDGE, ACTED IN A DECEITFUL MANNER, NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF FRAUD RELATIVE TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS. *Duty to report misconduct; code of conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA JOCELYN SHAW PARTY TO THE COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S) 1. Chapter 560, relating to the Money Transmitters’ Code. 2. Chapter 812, relating to theft, robbery, and related crimes. 3. Chapter 815, relating to computer-related crimes. 4. Chapter 817, relating to fraudulent practices. 5. Chapter 825, relating to abuse, neglect, and exploitation of elderly persons and disabled adults. 6. Chapter 831, relating to forgery and counterfeiting. 7. Chapter 832, relating to the issuance of worthless checks and drafts. 8. Chapter 838, relating to bribery and misuse of public office. 9. Chapter 839, relating to offenses by public officers and employees. 10. Chapter 895, relating to offenses concerning racketeering and illegal debts. 11. Chapter 896, relating to offenses related to financial transactions. (b) A felony offense that is committed with intent to defraud or that involves a conspiracy to defraud. (c) A felony offense that is committed with intent to temporarily or permanently deprive a person of his or her property or that involves a conspiracy to temporarily or permanently deprive a person of his or her property. (d) A felony offense that involves or results in the commission of fraud or deceit upon a person or that involves a conspiracy to commit fraud or deceit upon a person. (4) As used in this section, “aggravated white collar crime” means engaging in at least two white collar crimes that have the same or similar intents, results, accomplices, victims, or methods of commission, or that are otherwise interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated incidents, provided that at least one of such crimes occurred after the effective date of this act. (5) Any person who commits an aggravated white collar crime as defined in this section and in so doing either: (a) Victimizes 10 or more elderly persons, as defined in s. 825.101; (b) Victimizes 20 or more persons, as defined in s. 1.01; or (c) Victimizes the State of Florida, any state agency, any of the state’s political subdivisions, or any agency of the state’s political subdivisions, and thereby obtains or attempts to obtain $50,000 or more, commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. ACAP BAR COMPLAINT DETAILS/PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS VIOLATIONS. Fw: EMPLOYEE MISCOND KUCT (hate crimes, continuing domestic violence after breaking up with Williams) CF180-4 ( per your publication, the SCOPE of guidelines, goverance of employee ethical and professional conduct states: “Fraud” means to commit an intentional violation of law or a deliberate misrepresentation or concealment so as to secure unfair or unlawful financial or personal gain.) In this case whereas fraud in the manner and form constituting DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, PUBLIC OFFICER/ATTORNEY DECEIT, COLLUSION, that he/she did KNOWINGLY WITH INTENT TO COMMIT AGGRAVATED (COMPOUNDED) SEMITIC HATE, ETHNICALLY BIASED CRIMINAL TORTS, DURESS AND EMOTIONAL ABUSE AND ALIENATION TO THE MOTHER WHO WAS ALREADY A VICTIM OF ABUSE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN THE MANNER AND FORMS OF EXINTIMATE PARTNER & FAMILY VIOLENCE, PERSONALITY TORTS AND FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS, AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RELATED TO PRECEEDING ASCERTAINMENT PURSUITS THROUGH ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL ACTIONS WHICH WERE INTENTIONALLY AND "SELECTIVELY" BIASED IN APPLICATION OF THE LAWS BOTH FEDERAL AND STATE STATUTORY APPLICATION TO CHILD CUSTODY, CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION, RECOVERY AND DISBURSEMENT, WITH AN ACT OF VIOLENCE OCCURRING FEBRUARY 4TH 2011 IN THE ABATEMENT OF CHILD DUPPORT FROM THE PRECEEDING MONTH OF COLLECTION JANUARY 2011, AFTER JUDGEMENT REIDERED ON DECEMBER 22ND, 2010 LESS THAN 60(SIXTY DAYS) THAT EMPLOYEE KNOWLEDGE THRU THE RISS INFORMATION SHARING SYSTEM PROMPTED MALICIOUS, RETALIATORY STATEMENT TO INTERFER WITH FL SDU DISBURSEMENT, REVERSING THE JANUARY PAYMENT AFTER FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDING ONSET AGAIN AFTER AN EARLY DISMISSAL ON JANUARY 28TH, 2011, BOTH OF WHICH INITIAL CLAIM WERE OMITTED DUE TO EMPLOYEE FRAUD/MISCONDUCT


White Collar Fraud participant. Program abuse/court record omissions imposed a biased prejudice in judicial proceedings, concealment of criminal nonsupport histories of the payernal dad and domestic violence against the mother, natural parent. Ethnic intimidation on false allegations of kidnapping based on program employee misconduct involing Orange County Sheriff employee misconduct, family violence personality torts. The mother has no criminal history constituting violent crimes or kidnapping/missing children criminal charges nor child abuse as alleged personality torts were used to slander and defame the mother by the paternal dad's familt ties working in law enforcement. The incident involves retaliatory harassment related to a family violence situation in another state and county in which the paternal dad alleged that the mother's daughter was a participant in parental alienation and divorcee proceedings. Harassment that was setup through family ties wirking in administrative venue. Complaint involves neglience, FL DCF employee violations of administrative policies wherein it is clearly defined what constitutes employee misconduct, fraud. All parties knew of procedure based upon "duty of care", the greater responsibilty in reporting misconduct was tge responsibilty of the other employees and attorneys who routinely handle cases and are subject to administrative policies, statutory obligations and professional responsibilities under model policies of domestic violence, juvenile courts, FL DCF employee handbook code of conduct and which representation is suppose to enforce a fair and equal protection under the law. CF180-4 Complaint against: Devereux Florida Foster Care Program Orange/Osceola/Seminole County 5749 Westgate Drive, Suite 102 ~ Orlando, FL 32835 Phone: 321.441.1567 Fax: 321.281.3887 PERSONALITY TORTS TORTS OF FRAUD TO DEFAME CHARACTER OF THE MOTHER AS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PERPETUATED BY STATE EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT, CPI NUMBER 5617503201; Fw: Fwd: ATTACHED AFFIDAVIT ON DATE OF FALSE ALLEGATION BY CPI-ETHNIC BIASNESS/RACIAL PROFILING COMPLAINT;Fw: CPI 5617503201 EMERGENCY RESPONSE FALSE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED TO LAW ENFORCEMENT REGARDING CHILD CUSTODY - THE NATURAL PARENT, MOTHER HAD CUSTODY resubmitted the ACAP CONSUMER ASSISTANCE COMPLAINT/ACAP ATTY COMPLAINT/ INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM/INTENTIONALLY OMITTED FRAUDULENT STATEMENT , fraud and white collar criminal behavior 39.0141 A Missing Children Report is Required and is found to be absent in all proceedings prior to date. & 95.11 Tort actions for fraud or assault &39.0014,39.0141 MISSING CHILDRENS REPORT REQUIRED TO: CC / BCC: FROM:  SUBJECT: Fw: resubmitted the ACAP CONSUMER ASSISTANCE COMPLAINT/ACAP ATTY COMPLAINT/ INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM/INTENTIONALLY OMITTED FRAUDULENT STATEMENT , fraud and white collar criminal behavior 39.0141 A Missing Children Report is Required and is found to be absent in all proceedings prior to date. & 95.11 Tort actions for fraud or assault &39.0014,39.0141 MISSING CHILDRENS REPORT REQUIRED Choose File Original Message On Jan 9, 2017, at 9:30 AM, Sheila Shaw wrote: From: Sheila Shaw ; To: Nine09digits ; Sheila Jocelyn ; Subject: resubmitted the ACAP CONSUMER ASSISTANCE COMPLAINT/ACAP ATTY COMPLAINT/ INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM Sent: Fri, Jan 6, 2017 9:39:00 PM ACAP ATTY COMPLAINT/ INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA JOCELYN SHAW 863 EAST WESTMORELAND ST. PHILADELPHIA, PA 19134 (PREVIOUS ADDRESS OF WHICH COMPLAINT WAS SUBMITTED:PO BOX 5147, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33657-5175) FRAUD ON THE COURT TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM ATTACHED DOCUMENT TO THE FLORIDA BAR PARTY TO THE COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S) FLORIDA BAR MEMBER(S): SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS MACKEY GAL- Ana Elena Tangel-Rodriguez Eligible to Practice Law in Florida Bar Number: 254304 Mail Address:Tangel-Rodriguez and Associates Tangel-Rodriguez & Assoc 222 Weber St Orlando, FL 32803-3831 United States Office: 407-849-1133 Email:cselsp@att.net Personal Bar URL: www.floridabar.org/mybarprofile/254304 RUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire= Retained 407-786-2889( 1110 Douglas > Ave > Altamonte Springs, FL> 32714 > (407)> 786-2889 > http://www.russellhlaw.com THE SPECIFIC THING OR THINGS I AM COMPLAINING ABOUT ARE: 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242). "Color of law" simply means that the person doing the act is using power given to him or her by a governmental agency (local, State, or Federal). A law enforcement officer acts "under color of law" even if he or she is exceeding his or her rightful power. THAT ON THE ONSET OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA SHAW, AS THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION 7, ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT: Juvenile Division 2000 E. Michigan St.Suite 300 Orlando, FL 32806 PROCEEDINGS (WAIVED NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD TO BE IN WRITING- WAIVED BY THE JUDGE) WERE COMMENCED WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE HISTORICAL DATA AND CONCURRENT CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS, AND HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS CONCURRENTLY PUBLISHED IN DIVISION 42 COURT, VIA CLERK OF THE ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE RISS DATABASE, THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR ACCOUNTS OF INTERAGENCY ACCESS WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. THE COMPLAINANT MAKES REFERENCE THAT THE ATTORNEY’S, WITH KNOWLEDGE, ACTED IN A DECEITFUL MANNER, NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF FRAUD RELATIVE TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS. Fraud Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141: makes it unlawful for state or local law enforcement agencies to allow officers to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives persons of rights protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. This law is commonly referred to as the Police Misconduct Statute. the exintimate partner and public officer employee misconduct BUSINESS TORT RELATED-ADVERSARIAL TORTS OR MATERNAL INJURIES WITH INTENT http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer_29.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/any-police-department-receiving-federal.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/family-violence-prevention-act-victim.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/false-cpi-personal-torts-tort-of-fraud.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/jarrid-williams-probation-dc-346801.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/201 Federal laws Federal law 42 U.S.C. § 5772 & 42 U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5772) defines a "missing child" as "any individual less than 18 years of age whose whereabouts are unknown to such individual"s legal custodian." RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. "ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW WERE DIVESTED AND SUBSEQUENT LEGAL CAUSATION INCLUSIVE OF : 1. A MATERIAL INJURY IN THE PROCEEDINGS BELOW THAT CANNOT BE CONCLUDED ON POST JUDGEMENT APPEAL,2. INJURY WAS CAUSED BY A DEPARTURE FORM THE ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW (WHEN THEY ARE VIOLATED) OCCURRED. IMPROPER PURPOSE USED TO ACCESS TO THE FACILITY/HARASSMENT & TORTS) CONTINUATION OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT Fw: REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION TO REOPEN CASE CASE NO 2005-DR-014270-O DIVISION 42; Fw: ATTN KEITH PARKS Action founded on negligence, fraud and white collar criminal behavior 39.0141 A Missing Children Report is Required and is found to be absent in all proceedings prior to date. & 95.11 Tort actions for fraud or assault & 39.0014,39.0141 MISSING CHILDRENS REPORT REQUIRED WHICH IN ITS ABSENCE AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS CONSTITUTES FRAUD. TORT ACTIONS OF FRAUD INCLUSIVE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND VAWA BY THE FATHERS TO CASE WHO KNEW THE ALLEGATIONS WERE FALSE THE ATTORNEY’S TO CASE DID NOT CONSOLIDATE THE TWO DIVISIONS, DIVISION 7 AND DIVISION 42, WITH KNOWLEDGE THAT A “THRESHOLD OF DEMONSTRATIVE SHOWING OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT” IN ADDITION TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CHILD WOULD BE NECESSARY UNDER PROVISIONS OUTLINED REGARDING MINORS TO JUVENILE DEPENDENCY COURT CIVIL RULES OF PRACTICE, FLORIDA STATUTES CHAPTER 39. PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO CHILDREN THE DEVASTATION FROM THE PRESIDING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL PROCESS ALONG WITH THE STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT, ATTORNEY DECEIT INCLUDED THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS: § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. Civil contempt is conduct directed against the rights of the opposing party law-imposed obligation ;"an act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere with the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the dignity of the court or respect for its authority. There are two kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct contempt openly and in the presence of the court, resists the power of the court, 102 A. 400, 406; and consequential, or constructive contempt results from matters outside the court, such as failure to comply with orders. The basic standards governing fraud on the court are reasonably straightforward. As set forth in Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998): The requisite fraud on the court occurs where “it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.” Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989) . . . . The trial court has the inherent authority, within the exercise of sound judicial discretion, to dismiss an action when a plaintiff has perpetrated a fraud on the court, or where a party refuses to comply with court orders. Kornblum v. Schneider, 609 So. 2d 138, 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). CONCURRENT PROCEEDINGS THAT POSED A BIAS IN SUBSEQUENT CHILD CUSTODY PROCEEDINGS IN THE JUVENILLE COURT 7TH DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY COURTS Duty to report misconduct; code of conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA JOCELYN SHAW PARTY TO THE COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S) FLORIDA BAR MEMBER(S): SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS MACKEY GAL- “IN THE BEST INTERESTS OFTHE CHILD”, THE CHILD HAS THE RIGHT TO EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW/WHEREAS THE OMISSIONS RELATIVE TO THE CASE PROCEEDINGS PRESENTED A BIAS AND NONDISCLOSURE OF EXISTING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CONCURRENT WITH PROCEEDINGS WHICH AFFECTED THE CHILD, THE ECONOMIC DIVESTATION FROM FINANCIAL SUPPORT, LEGALLY DEFINED WITHIN THE MODEL POLICY OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE THAT THERE EXISTS ECONOMIC TORTS AND ABUSE REGARDING INTENTIONAL REFUSAL TO SUPPORT THE CHILD OF WHICH PATERNITY HAD BEEN ESTABLISHED 5 (5 X 365 DAYS) IN THE CASE OF CARLOS GONZALEZ AND IN THE CASE OF JARRID DESHAUN WILLIAMS THAT P0ROCEEDING WERE ON THE JUDICIAL CALENDAR IN THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT WITH A WITHDRAWAL ON FEBRAURY 14TH 2011 (COINCIDENTALLY AFTER THE ISSUANCE OF A TEMPORARY MODIFICATION OF CHILD CUSTODY, COINCIDENTALLY AFTER A CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT TO THE FLORIDA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT BY CARLOS GONZALEZ IN JANUARY FOR THE MONTY OF JANUARY 2011, AFTER THE FINAL JUDGEMENT FOR A CURRENT SUPPORT ORDER HAD BEEN ISSUED DECEMBER 22ND, 2010) VIOLATIONS INCLUDE: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NON SUPPORT & CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY ACT VIOLATION(COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENTS- TITLE 42, FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW VIOLATIONS: REQUIREMENT OF STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED PROCEDURES TO IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] (a) In order to satisfy section 454(20)(A), each State must have in effect laws requiring the use of the following procedures, consistent with this section and with regulations of the Secretary, to increase the effectiveness of the program which the State administers under this part: Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] (a (C) Voluntary paternity acknowledgment.— (iv) Use of paternity acknowledgment affidavit. —Such procedures must require the State to develop and use an affidavit for the voluntary acknowledgment of paternity which includes the minimum requirements of the affidavit specified by the Secretary under section 452(a)(7) for the voluntary acknowledgment of paternity, and to give full faith and credit to such an affidavit signed in any other State according to its procedures. Heather Morcroft (Appellate Atty) 20 n Orange Ave Ste 700 Orlando 32801 FBN 0709859 407-325-3585 Letter regarding fraud on the court, absent administrative remedy or action in a timely manner, that such a biasedness occurred it is described as unconscionably ethnically biased, a white collar criminal act by a party who misused his/her office to aid and assist avoidance of judicial action, that the action was in violation of the minor to case’s rights, that the action was in violation of parental rights to recovery of child support and paternity establishment in the Orange County, Ninth Judicial Circuit and Court, Division 42. Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:39 PM Subject: ATTORNEY GENERAL COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST Hershkowitz Russell S Attorney Category: Bankruptcy Law [Edit] 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 (407) 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com Thank you for contacting the Attorney General's Office regarding ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT . Our staff will process it as soon as possible and, if necessary, respond appropriately. We appreciate hearing from concerned citizens such as yourself. If you wish to keep abreast of the activities of this office, you may wish to consider a subscription to our electronic newsletter Weekly Briefing. Or perhaps our Consumer Alerts. Should you wish to subscribe to either, or both, publications, please visit our subscription page. COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST RUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire= Retained 407-786-2889( 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 (407) 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com COMMENT ENTERED ON FEBRUARY 14TH, 2011- OSCE FL DEPT OF REVENUE PETITIONED THE COURT TO WITHDRAW THE MOTION TO RECOVER BACK OWED OR RETROACTIVE CHILD SUPPORT SUBSEQUENT TO JUVENILE PROCEEDINGS. THE STATED MOTIONS STATES “THAT THE REPRESENTATION IS BEING WITHDRAWN AND THE PETITION IS WITHDRAWN DUE TO “QUESTIONABLE ARREARAGES OWED”- A BIASED STATEMENT WITHOU INQUIRY AND PRESENTATION OF THE FACTS OF RECORD AVAILABLE TO ALL FL DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES- FLORIDA- LEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DIVISION, AND FL DEPT OF REV. CHILD SUPPORT DIV.- THE ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT REGISTER OF ACTIONS MAINTAINS ALL PARTIES TO THE CASE(S) PATERNITY AND CHILD SUPPORT HISTORICAL DATA, ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS- WHICH ARE ABSENT IN PROCEEDINGS CONSTITUTING UNCONSCIONABLE DELAYS – IN THE CASE OF CARLOS GONZALEZ – THE PATERNITY CASE LASTED BETWEEN 2002 – 2006- RESUMING WITH A FILING OF PATERNITY CASE NUMBER IN 2005 FOR THE JUDGEMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT WHICH WE DO NOT SEE ENTERED AS A FINANL JUDGEMENT UNTIL DECEBMER 22, 2010- A PERIOD BETWEEN 2005-2010 (FIVE YEARS – DELAYED ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS- ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT) VAWA REPORT REGARDING NOT ONLY ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT IN CHILD CUSTODY MODIFICATION Intentionally omitted criminal nonsupport, offensive behaviour, professional misconduct and ethnic biasedness, child exploitation and institutional racism Title 42 section 42 1983, 14141 attorney prosecutorial child chustody exploitation including false statements never heard throughout case trial activity, false statements to commence proceedings Case Type:Paternity Date Filed:4/24/2002 Location:Div 38 UCN:482002DR006249A001OX Judge: Patricia A Doherty BARBARA FANCHER (LIMITED) JONES, > Esquire > Retained 407-849-1133(W) > Respondent GONZALEZ, CARLOS ALBERTO > Events & Orders of > the Court DISPOSITIONS > 05/15/2012 > Order Denying (Judicial > Officer: Evans, Robert M) CC: ACAP/THE REGIONAL/DISTRICT & OIG DID NOT COMPLY WITH OR THE WAS A FAILURE TO REPORT ( https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/report-fraud/) attached ethical complaint form regarding FL CPI CERTIFICATION FOR MISCONDUCT COMPLAINTS; Fw: ORGANIZED CRIME BETWEEN ATTYS FI FL DCF, GAL, CPI WHO INTENTIONAL COMMITTED FRAUDS, EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT, PERSONALITY TORTS & FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS IN COURT HARSSMENT DURING THE MOTHER AND NATURAL PARENT'S POSTSECONDARY ENROLLMENT & THEREAFTER DURING EMPLOYABILITY RECRUITING, LIBELOUS STATEMENT WERE MADE WHICH HAVE NO VALIDITY WHILE ABSCOUNDING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT & RECOVERY OF RETROACTIVE CHILD SUPPORT)Fw: COMPLAINT RE: GAL PERFORMANCE AND CONDUCT/ DORIS MACKEY REPRESENTING FL GAL ORANGE COUNTY COMPLAINT INCLUDES THAT THE GAL REPRESENTATIVE ALSO KNEW ABOUT HISTORICAL DATA OMITTED FROM TESTIMONY Fw: (CASE DP1140 DIV 7/OMITTED: INTENTIONAL BIASEDNESS concurrent court proceedings FL DCF KNEW ABOUT :NINTH DISTRICT HISTORICAL DATA DIV 38/42 PRECEEDING CLAIM BY DCF CPI FELICIA HANDLEY 2005DR14270 08-24-2004 Petition for paternity entered Service denied 09-24-2004 Petition to establish paternity denied Respondent petitioned to dismiss paternity 11-08-2004 05-05-2006 Final judgment granted on paternity 10-19-2010 Final judgment for child support entered 10-22-2010 Order for income deduction 11-29-2010 Notice of change of address 12-28-2010 Petition heard to establish child support 01-14-2011 Returned mail 01-04-2011 Motion to set arrears entered 01-04-2011 Notice and hearing 02-14-2011 Hearing to set arrears 01/28/2011 Plaintiff petitions for the need for custody denied 02/04/2011) Fw: Attorney Misconduct/Resubmitted/Attorney Details Needed Per Request PROSECUTOR’S ROLE IN ADDRESSING SUSPECTED LAW ENFORCEMENT MISCONDUCT (a) If the prosecutor has reason to suspect misconduct or unauthorized illegal activity at any level of the prosecutor’s office or in any agency or department engaged in a criminal investigation, the prosecutor should promptly report the suspicion and the reason for it to appropriate supervisory personnel in the prosecutor’s office who have authority to address the problem, or to the appropriate inspector general’s office, or similar agency, if reporting within the prosecutor’s own office is problematic. Reporting may also be required to comply with requirements of the applicable rules of professional conduct, the Model Rules and the law of the jurisdiction. Sheila Jocelyn Shaw %{attach}

Attorney misconduct. Florida Duty to report misconduct; code of conduct The duty to report misconduct is one of the ethical o imposed on attorneys in the United States by the rules governing professional responsibility. With certain exceptions, an attorney who becomes aware that either a fellow attorney or a judge has committed an act in violation of the rules of ethical conduct must report that violation. Failure to do so subjects the attorney failing to make the report to discipline.The duty extends only to actual knowledge possessed by an attorney. An attorney who has a mere suspicion of misconduct is not required to report that suspicion, nor is the attorney required to conduct any sort of investigation to confirm or dispel that suspicion. The conduct at issue must rise to the level of misconduct under the rules of professional responsibility. Thus, an attorney who witnesses another attorney become intoxicated, engage in adultery, or gamble away a large sum of money is under no duty to report these acts because they are not prohibited by the rules of professional responsibility. Conduct that must be reported, on the other hand, includes matters such as breaching client confidentiality, misusing client funds, tampering with evidence, suborning perjury, offering bribes, and committing criminal acts of violence or dishonesty. https://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 8-2.241 Civil Laws Governing Law Enforcement Misconduct BUT ALSO LAWS THAT ARE FOR THE PREVENTION OF NEGLECT OF THE CHILD. 827.03 Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; penalties.— All historical case proceedings associated with FL Dept of Rev. Child Support Enforcement/TANF participation & Medicaid participation relative to court proceedings were filed and available including court filings and shared RISs regional information sharing system btwn OCSE & DCF departments; FL DCF Case #9457320158 (RFA CASE NUMBER 1143172973) Ineffective counsel/representation,fraud to commence proceedings FL ACAP Complaint ATTY DECEIT, goo.gl/h9wjQr SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498, COLLUSION #OIG #fraud, PUBLIC LAW 108 - 21 #misconduct atty deceit,collusion;Case No. 2002-DR-050423-I,IVD case enforcement FL/PA/IN #misconduct, cases OC9901243 PA & 02-83719047104532 PA Cause # 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL 2010-DP 1170 FL CASE#s #misconduct,professional misconduct cases:OC9901243 PA & 02-83719047104532 PA Cause # 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL 2010-DP 1170 FL IN CASE #s



Thursday, 28 December 2017

Rule 12.003

Coordination of Related Family Cases and Hearings
(a)     Assignment to One Judge.
(1)     All related family cases must be handled before one judge unless impractical.
(2)     If it is impractical for one judge to handle all related family cases, the judges assigned to hear the related cases involving the same family and/or children may confer for the purpose of case management and coordination of the cases. Notice and communication shall comply with Canon 3.B.(7) of the Code of Judicial Conduct. The party who filed the notice of related cases or the court may coordinate a case management conference under rule 12.200 between the parties and the judges hearing the related cases. In addition to the issues that may be considered, the court shall:
(A)    consolidate as many issues as is practical to be heard by one judge;
(B)     coordinate the progress of the remaining issues to facilitate the resolution of the pending actions and to avoid inconsistent rulings;
(C)     determine the attendance or participation of any minor child in the proceedings if the related cases include a juvenile action; and
(D)    determine the access of the parties to court records if a related case is confidential pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420.

Monday, 27 November 2017

CENTRAL FLORIDA PARALEGAL ASSOCIATION- LINKEDIN

Here I posted a document entitled ORDER OF ARRAIGNMENT FOR JUVENILE DEPENDENCY HEARING in the foregoing link, whereas the CPI representing FL DCF CHILD PROTECTION AND CHILDREN'S LEGAL SERVICES alleged my children were missing - implying that they were at some point in the custody of someone other than their mother who was in family court proceedings against the paternal dads, who which by the way she kept making up excuses to call the dads and temporary allow them custody despite them being adverse court adversaries.
Such as on January 27th, 2011 Felicia Handley, CPI # , made up or fabricated an excuse for an overnight stay with the dads, the proceedings were dismissed by Judge Anthony Johnson on 1/28/2011 ONE DAY PRIOR TO MY DAUGHTERS'S FOURTH BIRTHDAY 01/29/2011.  HARASSMENT OR PERPETUATED DOMESTIC VIOLENCE THRU MISUSE OF OFFICE.
WHAT JUDGE DO YOU KNOW DOES NOT ADDRESS THE ALLEGATION IN HEARINGS HELD BETWEEN FEBRUARY 2011 THRU AUGUST 30TH, 2011- THIS CASE COMMENCED ON FRAUD AND ALL THE ATTORNEYS INVOLVED HAD THE FIRST PAGE OF THE ARRAIGNMENT & NEVER SAID ONE WORD THROUGHOUT THE HEARINGS BUT CONTINUED TO FABRICATE AN EXCUSE INCLUDING QUESTIONING MY MATRICULATION THROUGH EVEREST UNIVERSITY- ORLANDO NORTH - ORLANDO, FLORIDA & CORLLINS UNIVERSITY, STOCKTON, CA.RECENT  MATRICULATED PROGRAMS AT THE TIME OF HER ALLEGATIONS WHICH WERE REPORTED TO EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES DIVISION OF THE US DEPT OF JUSTICE AS A HATE CRIME, GENDER VIOLENCE.
http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/04/fraud-rule-33-candor-toward-tribunal.html
http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/05/cc-judicial-misconduct-judicial_23.html
https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/judicialethics/resources/TPL_jethics_internet.authcheckdam.pdf
HANDLEY KNEW THE PROCEDURE WELL AS IN ANY BAILOR/BAILEE OR DUTY OF CARE - ROUTINE PROCEDURES THEY DO EVERYDAY -AS WELL AS THE DEPENDENCY GAL PARTICIPANTS DORIS MACKEY & DCF ATTYS WHO NEVER CONSOLIDATED RELATED CASES-REQUIRED

Friday, 24 November 2017

Posted in LINKEDIN CENTRAL FLORIDA PARALEGAL ASSOCIATION





Fair justice INCUDING EQUAL FAIR UNBIASED REPRESENTATION ON THE CHILD. TEN YEARS SUPPORT RECOVERY 2002-2010 CHILD SUPPORT/PATERNITY OPEN CASES PUBLISHED VIA THE WEB

HARASSED EVERYDAY.



Complaint (5617503201, FELICIA HANDLEY, ORANGE COUNTY, FL CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children.

Attn: Ethics Investigator Confidential -Complaints-misappropriation of funds ( The Florida Bar Clients' Security Fund was created so that The Florida Bar might repay people who suffer financial losses due to misappropriation of funds by Florida lawyers when the funds were given to the lawyer under an attorney and client relationship. The Fund's money comes solely from the dues of Florida Bar members. The Clients' Security Fund )- The fraud-on-the-court doctrine as a remedy under the rules of civil procedure, it must prove, by clear and convincing evidence.

Complaint (5617503201, FELICIA HANDLEY, ORANGE COUNTY, FL CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting...
RE: INTENT TO DEFRAUD, FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS WITHIN SEVEN DAYS AFTER A FORMER CLAIM BY FELICIA HANDLEY IN JANUARY 27TH 2011 WAS DISMISSED BY JUDGE ANTHINY JOHNSON, THEREAFTER FELICIA HANDLEY EXASPERATED HER CLAIM TO MISSING CHILDREN, A VIOLENT CRIME CATEGOREY AND SUBJECT TO THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S COMMUNICATIONS MONITOR AND OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT TACTICS TO SURVEIL CHILD KIDNAPPING OR CHILD CRIMES WHICH WAS AN ALLEGATION FELICIA HANDLEY NEVER PRESENTED IN COURT NOR DID SHE TESTIFY TO SUCH A CLAIM IN DEPENDENCY COURT DUE TO ITS FRAUDULENT NATURE BY WHICH ANOTHER DVD ATTORNEY MADE A MOCKERY OF FRAUD IN HER STATEMENTS TO THE COURT BY WHICH SHE CONCEALED HER KNOWLEDGE THAT A FRAUD HAS BEEN COMMITTED TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS THEREAFTER FABRICATION OR A HINT FOR ANYTHING THAT COULD COME UP WITH OTHER THAN MEDICAL OR CHILD NEGLECT. NO AFFIDAVIT OR NEONATAL TO THE AUGUST 30TH, 2011 AJUDICATION OF THE HEARINGS AN

Tuesday, 7 November 2017

http://corporate.findlaw.com/litigation-disputes/complaint-against-a-florida-lawyer.html

WHAT IS THE CLIENTS' SECURITY FUND?
The Florida Bar Clients' Security Fund was created so that The Florida Bar might repay people who suffer financial losses due to misappropriation of funds by Florida lawyers when the funds were given to the lawyer under an attorney and client relationship.
The Fund's money comes solely from the dues of Florida Bar members.
The Clients' Security Fund went into operation on January 1, 1967. Misappropriations, which occurred before January 1, 1967, are not covered by the fund.
The Florida Bar investigates each claim and grants payments from the fund at its discretion according to the circumstances of each case. Payments from the fund are a matter of grace and not of right, and no payment may be made from the fund until a claim is thoroughly investigated. The sum reimbursed may be only a portion of the amount lost or it may be full restitution. There is a $50,000 limit on any claim. Claims for restitution of fees paid when a lawyer has provided no useful services are limited to up to $2,500.
If you are unsure whether you have a claim, you should nevertheless ask for a form. The effort may be worth your while.

Thursday, 2 November 2017

During and thereafter the appeal-vehicle theft incidents of property theft

http://orlando.craigslist.org/aos/6275084873.html

FraudDr 3 vehicle #thefts twitdoc.com/3Z89 RICO/Auto Parts,parts on theft,desecration of property,mechanic fraud,complaint Stage 3 Detail by Entity Name Florida Profit Corporation STAGE 3 AUTOMOTIVE, INC Filing Information Document Number P14000090694 FEI/EIN Number 47-1810028 Date Filed 11/05/2014 Effective Date 10/29/2014 State FL Status ACTIVE Principal Address 5240 W COLONIAL DR. ORLANDO, FL 32808 Mailing Address 5240 W COLONIAL DR. ORLANDO, FL 32808 Registered Agent Name & Address SAUNDERS, WARCHENE N 517 DELANEY AVE. 2B ORLANDO, FL 32801 Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title P SAUNDERS, WARCHENE N 517 DELANEY AVE. 2B ORLANDO, FL 32801 Title VP RILEY, KESHAWN D 1826 ORCHARD PARK DR. OCOEE, FL 34761 Title S RILEY, LAUREN P 1826 ORCHARD PARK DR. OCOEE, FL 34761 Title T RILEY, OMAR K 1826 ORCHARD PARK DR. OCOEE, FL 34761 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2015 04/06/2015

Who would pay for a K9 Alarm system, all the repairs, and the mechanic got $1000 reimbursement from his business & causality losses/insurance claim (which he supposedly left this $1000 part in the vehicle WHERE HE PARKED)? I NEVER GOT TO USE THE ALARM SYSTEM I PAID FOR. NEVER GOT THE DIAGNOSTIC FROM A SECOND MECHANIC BECAUSE STAGE TWO DID NOT SEND THE VEHICLE KEYS WITH THE VEHICLE WHEN IT WAS TOWED TO A SECOND SHOP TO VALIDATE THAT THE STEAL SEAL DIDN'T RESOLVE A HEAD GASKET PROBLEM, REDOING THE TOP HEADS BOTH $$400 REPAIRS EACH JOB-$800 IN ENGINE WORK SUPPOSEDLY DID NOT REPAIR A PROBLEM THAT AROSE AFTER ALL THESE OTHER REPAIRS LISTED AND PAID FOR AT OMAR'S SHOP.THE VEHICLE WENT INTO OMAR RILEY'S SHOP WITH NEW CALIPERS AND ROTORS $600 WORTH OF UNDERBODY FROM ACTION GATOR ALONE. WHICH WERE VISIBLE MOST LIKELY IN HIS INSPECTION.