Wednesday, 18 October 2017

RELATED CASESAND CONFIDENTIAL RECORDS The parties shall complywith the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, requiring a party to file a notice ofrelated cases, if any. A case is considered related if it involves the same parties, children, or issues and is pending when thefamily law case is filed; or if it affects the court’s jurisdiction to proceed; or ifan order in the related case may conflict with an order on the same issues in the newcase; or ifan order in the new case may conflict with an order in the earlier case. The Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Rules of Procedure Form 12.900(h), Notice ofRelated Cases, isattached asAppendix Four. The parties shall complywith the requirements involving social security numbers set forth in Chapter 61, Chapter 741-742 Florida Statutes (2007),as wellas the Florida FamilyLawRules ofProcedure. The parties shallcomplywith the requirements set forth in the Florida Rules of JudicialAdministration, as wellas the Florida Family Law Rules and Florida Statutes, pertaining to any request to makerecordsconfidential. SECTION 14: PARENTINGPLANS WITHTIME-SHARINGSCHEDULES: Aformto assist the parties in developing a parenting plan,approved by the Florida Supreme Court onMarch 26, 2009, is attached asAppendix Five(Form12.995(b)). As additionalassistance to parties, Model Parenting Plans with time-sharing schedules are provided inAppendices Six, Seven, and Eight. A Supervised/Safety-Focused Parenting Plan is attached as AppendixNine, Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms, Form12.995(b).


Saturday, 30 September 2017

Fw: Atty Deceit Complaint/Dependency Fraud in the court incidents ( Barbara Tanner Jones- Tangel-Rodriguez & Associates 222 Weber St, Orlando, FL 32803 Case# 482005DR014270A001OX) withdrew on February 15th, 2011 representation-(Where a lawyer learns of another lawyer’s misconduct in the course of representing her client, and the information about the misconduct constitutes a confidence or secret within the meaning of Rule 1.6, that Rule prohibits her reporting it without the client’s consent. If, after having been made fully aware of any possible adverse consequences for his ultimate recovery...) AFTER A FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS WAS INITIATED BY A FL DCF CPI- TEMPORARY MODIFICATION WAS REQUESTED TO ABATE NOT ONLY CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT IN A CURRENT ORDER ISSUES DECEMBER 22ND, 2010-TO ABATE LEGAL REPRESENTATION FROM THE GO DEPT OF REVENUE BECAUSE THE DVD ATTORNEYS HAD NO INTENTION OF CONSOLIDATING EXISTING FAMILY LAW CASES-RELATED CASES IN ORDER TO DEFRAUD THE COURT -IN WHICH THE INITIAL ALLEGATION WAS NEVER HEARD DURING PROCEEDINGS BETWEEN FEBRUARY 2011 THROUGH AUGUST 2011


> > Subject: Fw: Atty Deceit
> Complaint/Dependency Fraud in the court incidents (
> Barbara Tanner Jones-  Tangel-Rodriguez & Associates
>      222 Weber St, Orlando, FL 32803 Case#
> 482005DR014270A001OX)  withdrew on February 15th, 2011
> representation-(Where a lawyer learns of another lawyer’s
> misconduct in the course of representing her client, and the
> information about the misconduct constitutes a confidence or
> secret within the meaning of Rule 1.6, that Rule prohibits
> her reporting it without the client’s consent. If, after
> having been made fully aware of any possible adverse
> consequences for his ultimate recovery...)    AFTER A
> FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS WAS INITIATED BY A FL DCF CPI-
> TEMPORARY MODIFICATION WAS REQUESTED TO ABATE NOT ONLY CHILD
> SUPPORT PAYMENT IN A CURRENT ORDER ISSUES DECEMBER 22ND,
> 2010-TO ABATE LEGAL REPRESENTATION FROM THE GO DEPT OF
> REVENUE BECAUSE THE DVD ATTORNEYS HAD NO INTENTION OF
> CONSOLIDATING EXISTING FAMILY LAW CASES-RELATED CASES IN
> ORDER TO DEFRAUD THE COURT -IN WHICH THE INITIAL ALLEGATION
> WAS NEVER HEARD DURING PROCEEDINGS BETWEEN FEBRUARY 2011
> THROUGH AUGUST 2011
> > To: contact@nw3c.org
> > Date: Sunday, October 1, 2017,
> 1:01 AM
> >
> > Sheila Jocelyn Shaw
> > http://professsorshaw.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> > --- On Sun, 10/1/17, Sheila Shaw
> <nine09digits@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > From: Sheila Shaw <nine09digits@yahoo.com>
> > > Subject: Atty Deceit
> > Complaint/Dependency Fraud in the
> court incidents (
> > Barbara Tanner Jones-
> Tangel-Rodriguez & Associates
> >      222 Weber St, Orlando, FL
> 32803 Case#
> > 482005DR014270A001OX)  withdrew
> on February 15th, 2011
> > representation-(Where a lawyer
> learns of another lawyer’s
> > misconduct in the course of
> representing her client, and the
> > information about the misconduct
> constitutes a confidence or
> > secret within the meaning of Rule
> 1.6, that Rule prohibits
> > her reporting it without the
> client’s consent. If, after
> > having been made fully aware of
> any possible adverse
> > consequences for his ultimate
> recovery...)    AFTER A
> > FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS WAS
> INITIATED BY A FL DCF CPI-
> > TEMPORARY MODIFICATION WAS
> REQUESTED TO ABATE NOT ONLY CHILD
> > SUPPORT PAYMENT IN A CURRENT ORDER
> ISSUES DECEMBER 22ND,
> > 2010-TO ABATE LEGAL REPRESENTATION
> FROM THE GO DEPT OF
> > REVENUE BECAUSE THE DVD ATTORNEYS
> HAD NO INTENTION OF
> > CONSOLIDATING EXISTING FAMILY LAW
> CASES-RELATED CASES IN
> > ORDER TO DEFRAUD THE COURT -IN
> WHICH THE INITIAL ALLEGATION
> > WAS NEVER HEARD DURING PROCEEDINGS
> BETWEEN FEBRUARY 2011
> > THROUGH AUGUST 2011
> > > To: "American Bar
> Association"
> > <fje@americanbar.org>
> > > Date: Sunday, October 1,
> 2017,
> > 1:00 AM
> > > Ethics Opinion 246
> > > A Lawyer’s Obligation to
> Report
> > > Another Lawyer’s
> Misconduct
> > > A lawyer suing another lawyer
> for
> > > malpractice on behalf of a
> client
> > is required by Rule 8.3 to
> > > report to bar disciplinary
> > authorities the conduct that is
> > > the subject of the
> malpractice
> > action, if she has sufficient
> > > knowledge of the pertinent
> facts,
> > if her knowledge is not
> > > protected as a client
> confidence
> > or secret, and if the
> > > conduct of the other lawyer
> both
> > constitutes a violation of
> > > an ethical rule and raises a
> > substantial question as to the
> > > lawyer’s honesty,
> > trustworthiness or fitness in
> other
> > > respects.
> > >
> > >
> > > (All HHS and contract
> employees
> > have a
> > > responsibility to assist in
> > combating fraud, waste, and
> > > abuse in all departmental
> > programs.
> > >
> > > FL DCF EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT
> > > CF180-
> > >
> > >
> > > PART ONE (See Page 1, PART
> ONE -
> > > Complainant Information.):
> > Complaint Details Legal Cause and
> > > Tortious Injury (As a result
> of
> > the fraudulent
> > > acts/omissions, and deceit
> by
> > attorney and departmental
> > > employee whereas deprivation
> of
> > rights involved those rights
> > > of the minors and the
> natural
> > parent and mother) *FRAUD ON
> > > THE COURT TO COMMENCE
> PROCEEDINGS
> > On the part of the
> > > attorney herein and afore
> > mentioned in proceedings: Duty to
> > > report misconduct; code of
> > >
> >
> conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228
> > > THE FLORIDA BAR
> ATTORNEY/CONSUMER
> > ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651
> > > EAST JEFFERSON STREET
> TALLAHASSEE,
> > FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON
> > > THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015
> SHEILA
> > JOCELYN SHAW PARTY TO THE
> > > COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE
> ATTORNEY(S)
> > PART TWO (See Page 1,
> > > PART TWO - Attorney
> Information
> > FLORIDA BAR MEMBER(S):
> > > SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE
> STARR
> > ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD
> > > LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ
> 667498
> > AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC
> > > TIBON DORIS MACKEY GAL- PART
> T H R
> > E E (See Page 1, PART T H
> > > R E E - Facts/Allegations.):
> The
> > specific thing or things I
> > > am complaining about are:
> (attach
> > additional sheets as
> > > necessary) "Fraud. Rule 3.3
> Candor
> > Toward The Tribunal -
> > > Comment [1] This Rule governs
> the
> > conduct of a lawyer who is
> > > representing a client in the
> > proceedings of a tribunal. See
> > > Rule 1.0(m) for the
> definition of
> > "tribunal." It also
> > > applies when the lawyer is
> > representing a client in an
> > > ancillary proceeding
> conducted
> > pursuant to the tribunal’s
> > > adjudicative authority, such
> as a
> > deposition. Thus, for
> > > example, paragraph (a)(3)
> requires
> > a lawyer to take
> > > reasonable remedial measures
> if
> > the lawyer comes to know
> > > that a client who is
> testifying in
> > a deposition has offered
> > > evidence that is false. [2]
> This
> > Rule sets forth the special
> > > duties of lawyers as officers
> of
> > the court to avoid conduct
> > > that undermines the integrity
> of
> > the adjudicative process. A
> > > lawyer acting as an advocate
> in an
> > adjudicative proceeding
> > > has an obligation to present
> the
> > client's case with
> > > persuasive force. Performance
> of
> > that duty while maintaining
> > > confidences of the client,
> > however, is qualified by the
> > > advocate's duty of candor to
> the
> > tribunal. Consequently,
> > > although a lawyer in an
> adversary
> > proceeding is not required
> > > to present an impartial
> exposition
> > of the law or to vouch
> > > for the evidence submitted in
> a
> > cause, the lawyer must not
> > > allow the tribunal to be
> misled by
> > false statements of law
> > > or fact or evidence that the
> > lawyer knows to be false."
> > > State employee misconduct
> which
> > resulted in material
> > > injuries and legal
> causation:
> > *Police stalking. Conspired
> > > with FL DCF STATE EMPLOYEE
> > EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT, CPI NUMBER
> > > 5617503201 http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/?m=1
> > > 9457320158 (RFA CASE NUMBER
> > 1143172973) insurance
> > > covering dental/medical Dr.
> Obeori
> > & Dr.Nau (Michyl,
> > > Isis) http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/02/httpflcertificationboardorg.html?m=1
> > > Firm associated with
> complaint.
> > Interstate stalking and
> > > trespassing related to a
> divorcee
> > case. Hershkowitz Russell
> > > S Attorney : Fw:
> ADMINISTRATIVE
> > 92-1; In all family law
> > > cases in which a trial is
> > anticipated, the attorney shall
> > > submit a notice that the
> cause is
> > at issue.- intentional
> > > omissions; w: Mr. Williams
> is
> > refusing visitation with the
> > > minor contrary to the oral
> &
> > written child visitation
> > > with Atty Wayne Starr at the
> last
> > hearing 8/30/2011-
> > > subsequent modification
> petitions
> > have been submitted
> > > resulting in excuses by
> court
> > administration, lastly stating
> > > a parental responsibility
> packet
> > is needed- THERE IS NO
> > > PRESUMPTIVE FATHERHOOD
> STATUE
> > APPLICABLE, UNWED AT BIRTH AND
> > > CISTODY BTW 2007 THRU 2011
> WAS
> > WITH THE MOTHERHOOD. THERE IS
> > > NO CHANCE OF RESOLUTION OF
> ANY
> > INTIMATE PARTNER RELATIONSHIP
> > > & WILLIAMS AND SEVERAL OF
> HIS
> > FAMILY TIES HAVE REPEATED
> > > ENGAGED IN OFFENSIVE
> BEHAVIOURS
> > AND PROPERTY THEFTS MONETARY
> > > CLAIMS PRECEEDING THE ACTUAL
> > JUDGEMENT FOR SUPPORT Fw: Court
> > > Administration employee
> > misconduct/judicial misconduct-
> > > unconscionable delays &
> biased
> > proceedings, concealed
> > > concurtent criminal
> proceeding
> > involving Jarrid Williams
> > > 2/2011/ continuing domestic
> > violence& abuse of the child
> > > support order by law
> enforcement
> > personnel ,
> > >
> > >
> > > omissions: unconsolidated
> > cases/related
> > > cases whereas information
> therein
> > would substantially affect
> > > those involved such as that
> of
> > concurrent criminal
> > > nonsupport proceedings
> against the
> > plaintiff/paternal
> > > fathers to case- as
> indicative on
> > the Lidia Gardner Clerk of
> > > Court Registries http://icpcstatepages.org/florida/criminalbackground/
> > > 39.0138 Criminal history
> and
> > other records checks;
> > > limit on placement of a
> child—
> > (1) The department shall
> > > conduct a records check
> through
> > the State Automated Child
> > > Welfare Information System
> > (SACWIS) and a local and
> > > statewide criminal history
> records
> > check on all persons,
> > > including parents, being
> > considered by the department for
> > > placement of a child under
> this
> > chapter, including all
> > > non-relative placement
> decisions,
> > and all members of the
> > > household, 12 years of age
> and
> > older, of the person being
> > > considered. For purposes of
> this
> > section, a criminal history
> > > records check may include,
> but is
> > not limited to, submission
> > > of fingerprints to the
> Department
> > of Law Enforcement for
> > > processing and forwarding to
> the
> > Federal Bureau of
> > > Investigation for state and
> > national criminal history
> > > information, and local
> criminal
> > records checks through local
> > > law enforcement agencies of
> all
> > household members 18 years
> > > of age and older and other
> > visitors to the home. An
> > > out-of-state criminal
> history
> > records check must be
> > > initiated for any person 18
> years
> > of age or older who
> > > resided in another state if
> that
> > state allows the release of
> > > such records. The department
> shall
> > establish by rule
> > > standards for evaluating any
> > information contained in the
> > > automated system relating to
> a
> > person who must be screened
> > > for purposes of making a
> placement
> > decision. 1. Chapter
> > > 560, relating to the Money
> > Transmitters’ Code.
> > > 2. Chapter 812, relating
> to
> > theft, robbery, and related
> > > crimes. 3. Chapter 815,
> relating
> > to computer-related
> > > crimes. 4. Chapter 817,
> relating
> > to fraudulent practices.
> > > 5. Chapter 825, relating
> to
> > abuse, neglect, and
> > > exploitation of elderly
> persons
> > and disabled adults.
> > > 6. Chapter 831, relating
> to
> > forgery and counterfeiting.
> > > 7. Chapter 832, relating to
> the
> > issuance of worthless
> > > checks and drafts.
> 8. Chapter
> > 838, relating to bribery and
> > > misuse of public office.
> > 9. Chapter 839, relating to
> > > offenses by public officers
> and
> > employees. 10. Chapter
> > > 895, relating to offenses
> > concerning racketeering and
> > > illegal debts. 11. Chapter
> 896,
> > relating to offenses
> > > related to financial
> transactions.
> > (b) A felony offense
> > > that is committed with intent
> to
> > defraud or that involves a
> > > conspiracy to defraud.
> (c) A
> > felony offense that is
> > > committed with intent to
> > temporarily or permanently
> deprive
> > > a person of his or her
> property or
> > that involves a
> > > conspiracy to temporarily or
> > permanently deprive a person of
> > > his or her property. (d) A
> > felony offense that involves or
> > > results in the commission of
> fraud
> > or deceit upon a person
> > > or that involves a conspiracy
> to
> > commit fraud or deceit upon
> > > a person. (4) As used in
> this
> > section, “aggravated white
> > > collar crime” means
> engaging in
> > at least two white collar
> > > crimes that have the same or
> > similar intents, results,
> > > accomplices, victims, or
> methods
> > of commission, or that are
> > > otherwise interrelated by
> > distinguishing characteristics
> and
> > > are not isolated incidents,
> > provided that at least one of
> > > such crimes occurred after
> the
> > effective date of this act.
> > > (5) Any person who commits
> an
> > aggravated white collar
> > > crime as defined in this
> section
> > and in so doing either:
> > > (a) Victimizes 10 or more
> > elderly persons, as defined in
> > > s. 825.101; (b) Victimizes
> 20 or
> > more persons, as defined
> > > in s. 1.01; or
> (c) Victimizes
> > the State of Florida, any
> > > state agency, any of the
> state’s
> > political subdivisions,
> > > or any agency of the
> state’s
> > political subdivisions, and
> > > thereby obtains or attempts
> to
> > obtain $50,000 or more,
> > > commits a felony of the
> first
> > degree, punishable as provided
> > > in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or
> s.
> > 775.084. *concurrent court
> > > proceedings FL DCF KNEW
> ABOUT
> > :NINTH DISTRICT HISTORICAL
> > > DATA DIV 38/42 PRECEEDING
> CLAIM BY
> > DCF CPI FELICIA HANDLEY
> > > 2005DR14270 08-24-2004
> Petition
> > for paternity entered
> > > Service denied 09-24-2004
> Petition
> > to establish paternity
> > > denied Respondent petitioned
> to
> > dismiss paternity 11-08-2004
> > > 05-05-2006 Final judgment
> granted
> > on paternity 10-19-2010
> > > Final judgment for child
> support
> > entered 10-22-2010 Order
> > > for income deduction
> 11-29-2010
> > Notice of change of address
> > > 12-28-2010 Petition heard to
> > establish child support
> > > 01-14-2011 Returned mail
> > 01-04-2011 Motion to set arrears
> > > entered 01-04-2011 Notice
> and
> > hearing 02-14-2011 Hearing to
> > > set arrears 01/28/2011
> Plaintiff
> > petitions for the need for
> > > custody denied 02/04/2011
> THE
> > SPECIFIC THING OR THINGS I AM
> > > COMPLAINING ABOUT ARE: 18
> U.S.C.
> > §§ 241, 242). "Color of
> > > law" simply means that the
> person
> > doing the act is using
> > > power given to him or her by
> a
> > governmental agency (local,
> > > State, or Federal). A law
> > enforcement officer acts "under
> > > color of law" even if he or
> she is
> > exceeding his or her
> > > rightful power. THAT ON THE
> ONSET
> > OF PROCEEDINGS DATED
> > > 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA
> SHAW, AS
> > THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE
> > > DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION
> 7,
> > ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT:
> > > Juvenile Division 2000 E.
> Michigan
> > St.Suite 300 Orlando, FL
> > > 32806 PROCEEDINGS (WAIVED
> NOTICE
> > OF OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD
> > > TO BE IN WRITING- WAIVED BY
> THE
> > JUDGE) WERE COMMENCED
> > > WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF
> THE
> > PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE
> > > HISTORICAL DATA AND
> CONCURRENT
> > CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS, AND
> > > HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS
> > CONCURRENTLY PUBLISHED IN
> DIVISION
> > > 42 COURT, VIA CLERK OF THE
> ORANGE
> > COUNTY CLERK OF COURT,
> > > MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE
> RECORDS
> > MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE
> > > RISS DATABASE, THE DEPARTMENT
> OF
> > CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR
> > > ACCOUNTS OF INTERAGENCY
> ACCESS
> > WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
> > > OF REVENUE. THE COMPLAINANT
> MAKES
> > REFERENCE THAT THE
> > > ATTORNEY’S, WITH
> KNOWLEDGE,
> > ACTED IN A DECEITFUL MANNER,
> > > NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION
> FOR THE
> > PURPOSE OF FRAUD RELATIVE
> > > TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF
> JUDICIAL
> > PROCEEDINGS. *Duty to report
> > > misconduct; code of
> > >
> >
> conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228
> > > THE FLORIDA BAR
> ATTORNEY/CONSUMER
> > ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651
> > > EAST JEFFERSON STREET
> TALLAHASSEE,
> > FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON
> > > THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015
> SHEILA
> > JOCELYN SHAW PARTY TO THE
> > > COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE
> ATTORNEY(S)
> > 1. Chapter 560,
> > > relating to the Money
> > Transmitters’ Code.
> 2. Chapter
> > > 812, relating to theft,
> robbery,
> > and related crimes.
> > > 3. Chapter 815, relating
> to
> > computer-related crimes.
> > > 4. Chapter 817, relating
> to
> > fraudulent practices.
> > > 5. Chapter 825, relating
> to
> > abuse, neglect, and
> > > exploitation of elderly
> persons
> > and disabled adults.
> > > 6. Chapter 831, relating
> to
> > forgery and counterfeiting.
> > > 7. Chapter 832, relating to
> the
> > issuance of worthless
> > > checks and drafts.
> 8. Chapter
> > 838, relating to bribery and
> > > misuse of public office.
> > 9. Chapter 839, relating to
> > > offenses by public officers
> and
> > employees. 10. Chapter
> > > 895, relating to offenses
> > concerning racketeering and
> > > illegal debts. 11. Chapter
> 896,
> > relating to offenses
> > > related to financial
> transactions.
> > (b) A felony offense
> > > that is committed with intent
> to
> > defraud or that involves a
> > > conspiracy to defraud.
> (c) A
> > felony offense that is
> > > committed with intent to
> > temporarily or permanently
> deprive
> > > a person of his or her
> property or
> > that involves a
> > > conspiracy to temporarily or
> > permanently deprive a person of
> > > his or her property. (d) A
> > felony offense that involves or
> > > results in the commission of
> fraud
> > or deceit upon a person
> > > or that involves a conspiracy
> to
> > commit fraud or deceit upon
> > > a person. (4) As used in
> this
> > section, “aggravated white
> > > collar crime” means
> engaging in
> > at least two white collar
> > > crimes that have the same or
> > similar intents, results,
> > > accomplices, victims, or
> methods
> > of commission, or that are
> > > otherwise interrelated by
> > distinguishing characteristics
> and
> > > are not isolated incidents,
> > provided that at least one of
> > > such crimes occurred after
> the
> > effective date of this act.
> > > (5) Any person who commits
> an
> > aggravated white collar
> > > crime as defined in this
> section
> > and in so doing either:
> > > (a) Victimizes 10 or more
> > elderly persons, as defined in
> > > s. 825.101; (b) Victimizes
> 20 or
> > more persons, as defined
> > > in s. 1.01; or
> (c) Victimizes
> > the State of Florida, any
> > > state agency, any of the
> state’s
> > political subdivisions,
> > > or any agency of the
> state’s
> > political subdivisions, and
> > > thereby obtains or attempts
> to
> > obtain $50,000 or more,
> > > commits a felony of the
> first
> > degree, punishable as provided
> > > in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or
> s.
> > 775.084. ACAP BAR COMPLAINT
> > > DETAILS/PROFESSIONAL
> STANDARDS
> > VIOLATIONS. Fw: EMPLOYEE
> > > MISCOND KUCT (hate crimes,
> > continuing domestic violence
> > > after breaking up with
> Williams)
> > CF180-4 ( per your
> > > publication, the SCOPE of
> > guidelines, goverance of employee
> > > ethical and professional
> conduct
> > states: “Fraud” means
> > > to commit an intentional
> violation
> > of law or a deliberate
> > > misrepresentation or
> concealment
> > so as to secure unfair or
> > > unlawful financial or
> personal
> > gain.) In this case whereas
> > > fraud in the manner and form
> > constituting DOMESTIC VIOLENCE,
> > > PUBLIC OFFICER/ATTORNEY
> DECEIT,
> > COLLUSION, that he/she did
> > > KNOWINGLY WITH INTENT TO
> COMMIT
> > AGGRAVATED (COMPOUNDED)
> > > SEMITIC HATE, ETHNICALLY
> BIASED
> > CRIMINAL TORTS, DURESS AND
> > > EMOTIONAL ABUSE AND
> ALIENATION TO
> > THE MOTHER WHO WAS ALREADY
> > > A VICTIM OF ABUSE OF
> DOMESTIC
> > VIOLENCE IN THE MANNER AND
> > > FORMS OF EXINTIMATE PARTNER
> &
> > FAMILY VIOLENCE,
> > > PERSONALITY TORTS AND FRAUD
> TO
> > COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS, AND
> > > DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RELATED TO
> > PRECEEDING ASCERTAINMENT
> > > PURSUITS THROUGH
> ADMINISTRATIVE
> > AND JUDICIAL ACTIONS WHICH
> > > WERE INTENTIONALLY AND
> > "SELECTIVELY" BIASED IN
> APPLICATION
> > > OF THE LAWS BOTH FEDERAL AND
> STATE
> > STATUTORY APPLICATION TO
> > > CHILD CUSTODY, CHILD SUPPORT
> > COLLECTION, RECOVERY AND
> > > DISBURSEMENT, WITH AN ACT OF
> > VIOLENCE OCCURRING FEBRUARY 4TH
> > > 2011 IN THE ABATEMENT OF
> CHILD
> > DUPPORT FROM THE PRECEEDING
> > > MONTH OF COLLECTION JANUARY
> 2011,
> > AFTER JUDGEMENT REIDERED
> > > ON DECEMBER 22ND, 2010 LESS
> THAN
> > 60(SIXTY DAYS) THAT
> > > EMPLOYEE KNOWLEDGE THRU THE
> RISS
> > INFORMATION SHARING SYSTEM
> > > PROMPTED MALICIOUS,
> RETALIATORY
> > STATEMENT TO INTERFER WITH
> > > FL SDU DISBURSEMENT,
> REVERSING THE
> > JANUARY PAYMENT AFTER
> > > FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDING
> ONSET
> > AGAIN AFTER AN EARLY
> > > DISMISSAL ON JANUARY 28TH,
> 2011,
> > BOTH OF WHICH INITIAL CLAIM
> > > WERE OMITTED DUE TO EMPLOYEE
> > FRAUD/MISCONDUCT
> > >
> > >
> > > White Collar Fraud
> participant.
> > Program
> > > abuse/court record omissions
> > imposed a biased prejudice in
> > > judicial proceedings,
> concealment
> > of criminal nonsupport
> > > histories of the payernal dad
> and
> > domestic violence against
> > > the mother, natural parent.
> Ethnic
> > intimidation on false
> > > allegations of kidnapping
> based on
> > program employee
> > > misconduct involing Orange
> County
> > Sheriff employee
> > > misconduct, family violence
> > personality torts. The mother
> > > has no criminal history
> > constituting violent crimes or
> > > kidnapping/missing children
> > criminal charges nor child abuse
> > > as alleged personality torts
> were
> > used to slander and defame
> > > the mother by the paternal
> dad's
> > familt ties working in law
> > > enforcement. The incident
> involves
> > retaliatory harassment
> > > related to a family violence
> > situation in another state and
> > > county in which the paternal
> dad
> > alleged that the mother's
> > > daughter was a participant
> in
> > parental alienation and
> > > divorcee proceedings.
> Harassment
> > that was setup through
> > > family ties wirking in
> > administrative venue. Complaint
> > > involves neglience, FL DCF
> > employee violations of
> > > administrative policies
> wherein it
> > is clearly defined what
> > > constitutes employee
> misconduct,
> > fraud. All parties knew of
> > > procedure based upon "duty
> of
> > care", the greater
> > > responsibilty in reporting
> > misconduct was tge responsibilty
> > > of the other employees and
> > attorneys who routinely handle
> > > cases and are subject to
> > administrative policies,
> statutory
> > > obligations and professional
> > responsibilities under model
> > > policies of domestic
> violence,
> > juvenile courts, FL DCF
> > > employee handbook code of
> conduct
> > and which representation
> > > is suppose to enforce a fair
> and
> > equal protection under the
> > > law. CF180-4 Complaint
> against:
> > Devereux Florida Foster Care
> > > Program
> Orange/Osceola/Seminole
> > County 5749 Westgate Drive,
> > > Suite 102 ~ Orlando, FL
> 32835
> > Phone: 321.441.1567 Fax:
> > > 321.281.3887 PERSONALITY
> TORTS
> > TORTS OF FRAUD TO DEFAME
> > > CHARACTER OF THE MOTHER AS
> > DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PERPETUATED BY
> > > STATE EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT,
> CPI
> > NUMBER 5617503201; Fw: Fwd:
> > > ATTACHED AFFIDAVIT ON DATE
> OF
> > FALSE ALLEGATION BY CPI-ETHNIC
> > > BIASNESS/RACIAL PROFILING
> > COMPLAINT;Fw: CPI 5617503201
> > > EMERGENCY RESPONSE FALSE
> COMPLAINT
> > SUBMITTED TO LAW
> > > ENFORCEMENT REGARDING CHILD
> > CUSTODY - THE NATURAL PARENT,
> > > MOTHER HAD CUSTODY
> resubmitted the
> > ACAP CONSUMER ASSISTANCE
> > > COMPLAINT/ACAP ATTY
> COMPLAINT/
> > INQUIRY/COMPLAINT
> > > FORM/INTENTIONALLY OMITTED
> > FRAUDULENT STATEMENT , fraud and
> > > white collar criminal
> behavior
> > 39.0141 A Missing Children
> > > Report is Required and is
> found to
> > be absent in all
> > > proceedings prior to date.
> &
> > 95.11 Tort actions for
> > > fraud or assault
> > &39.0014,39.0141 MISSING
> CHILDRENS
> > > REPORT REQUIRED TO: CC /
> BCC:
> > FROM:  SUBJECT: Fw:
> > > resubmitted the ACAP
> CONSUMER
> > ASSISTANCE COMPLAINT/ACAP ATTY
> > > COMPLAINT/ INQUIRY/COMPLAINT
> > FORM/INTENTIONALLY OMITTED
> > > FRAUDULENT STATEMENT , fraud
> and
> > white collar criminal
> > > behavior 39.0141 A Missing
> > Children Report is Required and
> > > is found to be absent in all
> > proceedings prior to date.
> > > & 95.11 Tort actions for
> fraud
> > or assault
> > > &39.0014,39.0141 MISSING
> > CHILDRENS REPORT REQUIRED
> > > Choose File Original Message
> On
> > Jan 9, 2017, at 9:30 AM,
> > > Sheila Shaw wrote: From:
> Sheila
> > Shaw ; To: Nine09digits ;
> > > Sheila Jocelyn ; Subject:
> > resubmitted the ACAP CONSUMER
> > > ASSISTANCE COMPLAINT/ACAP
> ATTY
> > COMPLAINT/ INQUIRY/COMPLAINT
> > > FORM Sent: Fri, Jan 6, 2017
> > 9:39:00 PM ACAP ATTY COMPLAINT/
> > > INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM THE
> FLORIDA
> > BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER
> > > ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST
> > JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE,
> > > FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON THIS
> 5TH DAY
> > OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA
> > > JOCELYN SHAW 863 EAST
> WESTMORELAND
> > ST. PHILADELPHIA, PA
> > > 19134 (PREVIOUS ADDRESS OF
> WHICH
> > COMPLAINT WAS SUBMITTED:PO
> > > BOX 5147, TAMPA, FLORIDA
> > 33657-5175) FRAUD ON THE COURT TO
> > > COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS
> > INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM ATTACHED
> > > DOCUMENT TO THE FLORIDA BAR
> PARTY
> > TO THE COMPLAINT: AGAINST
> > > THE ATTORNEY(S) FLORIDA BAR
> > MEMBER(S): SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ
> > > 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY
> SOS
> > GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA
> > > HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA
> ETZKORN
> > 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS
> > > MACKEY GAL- Ana Elena
> > Tangel-Rodriguez Eligible to
> Practice
> > > Law in Florida Bar Number:
> 254304
> > Mail
> > > Address:Tangel-Rodriguez and
> > Associates Tangel-Rodriguez
> > > & Assoc 222 Weber St
> Orlando,
> > FL 32803-3831 United
> > > States Office: 407-849-1133
> > Email:cselsp@att.net
> > > Personal Bar URL:
> >
> www.floridabar.org/mybarprofile/254304
> > > RUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ,
> > Esquire= Retained 407-786-2889(
> > > 1110 Douglas > Ave >
> > Altamonte Springs, FL> 32714
> > > > (407)> 786-2889 >
> http://www.russellhlaw.com THE SPECIFIC THING OR
> > THINGS
> > > I AM COMPLAINING ABOUT ARE:
> 18
> > U.S.C. §§ 241, 242). "Color
> > > of law" simply means that
> the
> > person doing the act is using
> > > power given to him or her by
> a
> > governmental agency (local,
> > > State, or Federal). A law
> > enforcement officer acts "under
> > > color of law" even if he or
> she is
> > exceeding his or her
> > > rightful power. THAT ON THE
> ONSET
> > OF PROCEEDINGS DATED
> > > 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA
> SHAW, AS
> > THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE
> > > DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION
> 7,
> > ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT:
> > > Juvenile Division 2000 E.
> Michigan
> > St.Suite 300 Orlando, FL
> > > 32806 PROCEEDINGS (WAIVED
> NOTICE
> > OF OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD
> > > TO BE IN WRITING- WAIVED BY
> THE
> > JUDGE) WERE COMMENCED
> > > WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF
> THE
> > PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE
> > > HISTORICAL DATA AND
> CONCURRENT
> > CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS, AND
> > > HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS
> > CONCURRENTLY PUBLISHED IN
> DIVISION
> > > 42 COURT, VIA CLERK OF THE
> ORANGE
> > COUNTY CLERK OF COURT,
> > > MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE
> RECORDS
> > MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE
> > > RISS DATABASE, THE DEPARTMENT
> OF
> > CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR
> > > ACCOUNTS OF INTERAGENCY
> ACCESS
> > WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
> > > OF REVENUE. THE COMPLAINANT
> MAKES
> > REFERENCE THAT THE
> > > ATTORNEY’S, WITH
> KNOWLEDGE,
> > ACTED IN A DECEITFUL MANNER,
> > > NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION
> FOR THE
> > PURPOSE OF FRAUD RELATIVE
> > > TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF
> JUDICIAL
> > PROCEEDINGS. Fraud Title 42,
> > > U.S.C., Section 14141: makes
> it
> > unlawful for state or local
> > > law enforcement agencies to
> allow
> > officers to engage in a
> > > pattern or practice of
> conduct
> > that deprives persons of
> > > rights protected by the
> > Constitution or laws of the
> United
> > > States. This law is commonly
> > referred to as the Police
> > > Misconduct Statute. the
> exintimate
> > partner and public
> > > officer employee misconduct
> > BUSINESS TORT
> > > RELATED-ADVERSARIAL TORTS OR
> > MATERNAL INJURIES WITH INTENT
> > > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer_29.html
> > > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/any-police-department-receiving-federal.html
> > > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/family-violence-prevention-act-victim.html
> > > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/false-cpi-personal-torts-tort-of-fraud.html
> > > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/jarrid-williams-probation-dc-346801.html
> > > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/201
> > > Federal laws Federal law 42
> U.S.C.
> > § 5772 & 42
> > > U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law
> (42
> > U.S.C. § 5772) defines a
> > > "missing child" as "any
> individual
> > less than 18 years of age
> > > whose whereabouts are unknown
> to
> > such individual"s legal
> > > custodian." RE: CF OPERATING
> > PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI,
> > > PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF
> FRAUD
> > Section 39.205, Florida
> > > Statutes (F.S.) states what
> the
> > department has to do
> > > concerning false reporting
> for
> > children and Section 415.111,
> > > F.S. addresses with false
> > reporting for adults. "ESSENTIAL
> > > REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW WERE
> > DIVESTED AND SUBSEQUENT LEGAL
> > > CAUSATION INCLUSIVE OF : 1.
> A
> > MATERIAL INJURY IN THE
> > > PROCEEDINGS BELOW THAT CANNOT
> BE
> > CONCLUDED ON POST JUDGEMENT
> > > APPEAL,2. INJURY WAS CAUSED
> BY A
> > DEPARTURE FORM THE
> > > ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE
> LAW
> > (WHEN THEY ARE VIOLATED)
> > > OCCURRED. IMPROPER PURPOSE
> USED TO
> > ACCESS TO THE
> > > FACILITY/HARASSMENT &
> TORTS)
> > CONTINUATION OF
> > > PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT Fw:
> > REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE
> > > ACTION TO REOPEN CASE CASE
> NO
> > 2005-DR-014270-O DIVISION 42;
> > > Fw: ATTN KEITH PARKS Action
> > founded on negligence, fraud and
> > > white collar criminal
> behavior
> > 39.0141 A Missing Children
> > > Report is Required and is
> found to
> > be absent in all
> > > proceedings prior to date.
> &
> > 95.11 Tort actions for
> > > fraud or assault &
> > 39.0014,39.0141 MISSING CHILDRENS
> > > REPORT REQUIRED WHICH IN ITS
> > ABSENCE AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF
> > > PROCEEDINGS CONSTITUTES
> FRAUD.
> > TORT ACTIONS OF FRAUD
> > > INCLUSIVE OF DOMESTIC
> VIOLENCE AND
> > VAWA BY THE FATHERS TO
> > > CASE WHO KNEW THE ALLEGATIONS
> WERE
> > FALSE THE ATTORNEY’S TO
> > > CASE DID NOT CONSOLIDATE THE
> TWO
> > DIVISIONS, DIVISION 7 AND
> > > DIVISION 42, WITH KNOWLEDGE
> THAT A
> > “THRESHOLD OF
> > > DEMONSTRATIVE SHOWING OF
> FINANCIAL
> > SUPPORT” IN ADDITION TO
> > > THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A
> > RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CHILD WOULD
> BE
> > > NECESSARY UNDER PROVISIONS
> > OUTLINED REGARDING MINORS TO
> > > JUVENILE DEPENDENCY COURT
> CIVIL
> > RULES OF PRACTICE, FLORIDA
> > > STATUTES CHAPTER 39.
> PROCEEDINGS
> > RELATING TO CHILDREN THE
> > > DEVASTATION FROM THE
> PRESIDING
> > RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL
> > > PROCESS ALONG WITH THE
> STANDARDS
> > OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT,
> > > ATTORNEY DECEIT INCLUDED THE
> > FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS: §
> > > 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. Civil
> > contempt is conduct directed
> > > against the rights of the
> opposing
> > party law-imposed
> > > obligation ;"an act or
> omission
> > tending to obstruct or
> > > interfere with the orderly
> > administration of justice, or to
> > > impair the dignity of the
> court or
> > respect for its
> > > authority. There are two
> kinds,
> > direct and constructive."
> > > 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct
> > contempt openly and in the
> > > presence of the court,
> resists the
> > power of the court, 102
> > > A. 400, 406; and
> consequential, or
> > constructive contempt
> > > results from matters outside
> the
> > court, such as failure to
> > > comply with orders. The
> basic
> > standards governing fraud on
> > > the court are reasonably
> > straightforward. As set forth in
> > > Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43,
> 47
> > (Fla. 5th DCA 1998): The
> > > requisite fraud on the court
> > occurs where “it can be
> > > demonstrated, clearly and
> > convincingly, that a party has
> > > sentiently set in motion
> some
> > unconscionable scheme
> > > calculated to interfere with
> the
> > judicial system’s ability
> > > impartially to adjudicate a
> matter
> > by improperly influencing
> > > the trier of fact or
> unfairly
> > hampering the presentation of
> > > the opposing party’s claim
> or
> > defense.” Aoude v. Mobil
> > > Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115,
> 1118
> > (1st Cir. 1989) . . . . The
> > > trial court has the inherent
> > authority, within the exercise
> > > of sound judicial discretion,
> to
> > dismiss an action when a
> > > plaintiff has perpetrated a
> fraud
> > on the court, or where a
> > > party refuses to comply with
> court
> > orders. Kornblum v.
> > > Schneider, 609 So. 2d 138,
> 139
> > (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).
> > > CONCURRENT PROCEEDINGS THAT
> POSED
> > A BIAS IN SUBSEQUENT CHILD
> > > CUSTODY PROCEEDINGS IN THE
> > JUVENILLE COURT 7TH DISTRICT
> > > ORANGE COUNTY COURTS Duty to
> > report misconduct; code of
> > >
> >
> conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228
> > > THE FLORIDA BAR
> ATTORNEY/CONSUMER
> > ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651
> > > EAST JEFFERSON STREET
> TALLAHASSEE,
> > FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON
> > > THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015
> SHEILA
> > JOCELYN SHAW PARTY TO THE
> > > COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE
> ATTORNEY(S)
> > FLORIDA BAR MEMBER(S):
> > > SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE
> STARR
> > ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD
> > > LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ
> 667498
> > AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC
> > > TIBON DORIS MACKEY GAL- “IN
> THE
> > BEST INTERESTS OFTHE
> > > CHILD”, THE CHILD HAS THE
> RIGHT
> > TO EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER
> > > THE LAW/WHEREAS THE
> OMISSIONS
> > RELATIVE TO THE CASE
> > > PROCEEDINGS PRESENTED A BIAS
> AND
> > NONDISCLOSURE OF EXISTING
> > > DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CONCURRENT
> WITH
> > PROCEEDINGS WHICH AFFECTED
> > > THE CHILD, THE ECONOMIC
> > DIVESTATION FROM FINANCIAL
> SUPPORT,
> > > LEGALLY DEFINED WITHIN THE
> MODEL
> > POLICY OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
> > > THAT THERE EXISTS ECONOMIC
> TORTS
> > AND ABUSE REGARDING
> > > INTENTIONAL REFUSAL TO
> SUPPORT THE
> > CHILD OF WHICH PATERNITY
> > > HAD BEEN ESTABLISHED 5 (5 X
> 365
> > DAYS) IN THE CASE OF CARLOS
> > > GONZALEZ AND IN THE CASE OF
> JARRID
> > DESHAUN WILLIAMS THAT
> > > P0ROCEEDING WERE ON THE
> JUDICIAL
> > CALENDAR IN THE NINTH
> > > DISTRICT COURT WITH A
> WITHDRAWAL
> > ON FEBRAURY 14TH 2011
> > > (COINCIDENTALLY AFTER THE
> ISSUANCE
> > OF A TEMPORARY
> > > MODIFICATION OF CHILD
> CUSTODY,
> > COINCIDENTALLY AFTER A CHILD
> > > SUPPORT PAYMENT TO THE
> FLORIDA
> > STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT BY
> > > CARLOS GONZALEZ IN JANUARY
> FOR THE
> > MONTY OF JANUARY 2011,
> > > AFTER THE FINAL JUDGEMENT FOR
> A
> > CURRENT SUPPORT ORDER HAD
> > > BEEN ISSUED DECEMBER 22ND,
> 2010)
> > VIOLATIONS INCLUDE:
> > > ATTORNEY
> MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING
> > CRIMINAL NON SUPPORT &
> > > CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY ACT
> > VIOLATION(COLLECTION AND
> > > DISTRIBUTION OF CHILD
> SUPPORT
> > PAYMENTS- TITLE 42, FEDERAL
> > > CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION
> LAWS,
> > SOCIAL SECURITY ACT
> > > 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE,
> ASSISTING
> > JUDICIAL
> > > MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW
> > VIOLATIONS: REQUIREMENT OF
> > > STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED
> PROCEDURES
> > TO IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS
> > > OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT
> Sec.
> > 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] (a)
> > > In order to satisfy section
> > 454(20)(A), each State must have
> > > in effect laws requiring the
> use
> > of the following
> > > procedures, consistent with
> this
> > section and with
> > > regulations of the Secretary,
> to
> > increase the effectiveness
> > > of the program which the
> State
> > administers under this part:
> > > Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] (a
> (C)
> > Voluntary paternity
> > > acknowledgment.— (iv) Use
> of
> > paternity acknowledgment
> > > affidavit. —Such procedures
> must
> > require the State to
> > > develop and use an affidavit
> for
> > the voluntary
> > > acknowledgment of paternity
> which
> > includes the minimum
> > > requirements of the
> affidavit
> > specified by the Secretary
> > > under section 452(a)(7) for
> the
> > voluntary acknowledgment of
> > > paternity, and to give full
> faith
> > and credit to such an
> > > affidavit signed in any
> other
> > State according to its
> > > procedures. Heather Morcroft
> > (Appellate Atty) 20 n Orange
> > > Ave Ste 700 Orlando 32801
> FBN
> > 0709859 407-325-3585 Letter
> > > regarding fraud on the
> court,
> > absent administrative remedy
> > > or action in a timely manner,
> that
> > such a biasedness
> > > occurred it is described as
> > unconscionably ethnically
> > > biased, a white collar
> criminal
> > act by a party who misused
> > > his/her office to aid and
> assist
> > avoidance of judicial
> > > action, that the action was
> in
> > violation of the minor to
> > > case’s rights, that the
> action
> > was in violation of
> > > parental rights to recovery
> of
> > child support and paternity
> > > establishment in the Orange
> > County, Ninth Judicial Circuit
> > > and Court, Division 42.
> Sent:
> > Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:39
> > > PM Subject: ATTORNEY GENERAL
> > COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST
> > > Hershkowitz Russell S
> Attorney
> > Category: Bankruptcy Law
> > > [Edit] 1110 Douglas Ave
> Altamonte
> > Springs, FL 32714 (407)
> > > 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com Thank you for contacting
> > the
> > > Attorney General's Office
> > regarding ATTORNEY
> > > MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING
> CRIMINAL
> > NONSUPPORT . Our staff will
> > > process it as soon as
> possible
> > and, if necessary, respond
> > > appropriately. We appreciate
> > hearing from concerned citizens
> > > such as yourself. If you wish
> to
> > keep abreast of the
> > > activities of this office,
> you may
> > wish to consider a
> > > subscription to our
> electronic
> > newsletter Weekly Briefing.
> > > Or perhaps our Consumer
> Alerts.
> > Should you wish to subscribe
> > > to either, or both,
> publications,
> > please visit our
> > > subscription page. COMPLAINT
> FILED
> > AGAINST RUSSELL SCOTT
> > > HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire=
> Retained
> > 407-786-2889( 1110 Douglas
> > > Ave Altamonte Springs, FL
> 32714
> > (407) 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com COMMENT
> > ENTERED ON FEBRUARY
> > > 14TH, 2011- OSCE FL DEPT OF
> > REVENUE PETITIONED THE COURT TO
> > > WITHDRAW THE MOTION TO
> RECOVER
> > BACK OWED OR RETROACTIVE
> > > CHILD SUPPORT SUBSEQUENT TO
> > JUVENILE PROCEEDINGS. THE STATED
> > > MOTIONS STATES “THAT THE
> > REPRESENTATION IS BEING WITHDRAWN
> > > AND THE PETITION IS WITHDRAWN
> DUE
> > TO “QUESTIONABLE
> > > ARREARAGES OWED”- A BIASED
> > STATEMENT WITHOU INQUIRY AND
> > > PRESENTATION OF THE FACTS OF
> > RECORD AVAILABLE TO ALL FL
> > > DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND
> > FAMILIES- FLORIDA- LEGAL SERVICES
> > > FOR CHILDREN, DOMESTIC
> VIOLENCE
> > DIVISION, AND FL DEPT OF
> > > REV. CHILD SUPPORT DIV.- THE
> > ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT
> > > REGISTER OF ACTIONS MAINTAINS
> ALL
> > PARTIES TO THE CASE(S)
> > > PATERNITY AND CHILD SUPPORT
> > HISTORICAL DATA, ADMINISTRATIVE
> > > ORDERS- WHICH ARE ABSENT IN
> > PROCEEDINGS CONSTITUTING
> > > UNCONSCIONABLE DELAYS – IN
> THE
> > CASE OF CARLOS GONZALEZ –
> > > THE PATERNITY CASE LASTED
> BETWEEN
> > 2002 – 2006- RESUMING
> > > WITH A FILING OF PATERNITY
> CASE
> > NUMBER IN 2005 FOR THE
> > > JUDGEMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT
> WHICH
> > WE DO NOT SEE ENTERED AS A
> > > FINANL JUDGEMENT UNTIL
> DECEBMER
> > 22, 2010- A PERIOD BETWEEN
> > > 2005-2010 (FIVE YEARS –
> DELAYED
> > ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS-
> > > ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT) VAWA
> REPORT
> > REGARDING NOT ONLY ATTORNEY
> > > MISCONDUCT IN CHILD CUSTODY
> > MODIFICATION Intentionally
> > > omitted criminal nonsupport,
> > offensive behaviour,
> > > professional misconduct and
> ethnic
> > biasedness, child
> > > exploitation and
> institutional
> > racism Title 42 section 42
> > > 1983, 14141 attorney
> prosecutorial
> > child chustody
> > > exploitation including false
> > statements never heard
> > > throughout case trial
> activity,
> > false statements to commence
> > > proceedings Case
> Type:Paternity
> > Date Filed:4/24/2002
> > > Location:Div 38
> > UCN:482002DR006249A001OX Judge:
> Patricia A
> > > Doherty BARBARA FANCHER
> (LIMITED)
> > JONES, > Esquire >
> > > Retained 407-849-1133(W)
> >
> > Respondent GONZALEZ, CARLOS
> > > ALBERTO > Events &
> Orders
> > of > the Court
> > > DISPOSITIONS > 05/15/2012
> >
> > Order Denying (Judicial
> > > > Officer: Evans, Robert
> M) CC:
> > ACAP/THE
> > > REGIONAL/DISTRICT & OIG
> DID
> > NOT COMPLY WITH OR THE WAS A
> > > FAILURE TO REPORT ( https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/report-fraud/) attached
> > > ethical complaint form
> regarding
> > FL CPI CERTIFICATION FOR
> > > MISCONDUCT COMPLAINTS; Fw:
> > ORGANIZED CRIME BETWEEN ATTYS FI
> > > FL DCF, GAL, CPI WHO
> INTENTIONAL
> > COMMITTED FRAUDS, EMPLOYEE
> > > MISCONDUCT, PERSONALITY
> TORTS
> > & FRAUD TO COMMENCE
> > > PROCEEDINGS IN COURT
> HARSSMENT
> > DURING THE MOTHER AND NATURAL
> > > PARENT'S POSTSECONDARY
> ENROLLMENT
> > & THEREAFTER DURING
> > > EMPLOYABILITY RECRUITING,
> LIBELOUS
> > STATEMENT WERE MADE WHICH
> > > HAVE NO VALIDITY WHILE
> ABSCOUNDING
> > CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT &
> > > RECOVERY OF RETROACTIVE
> CHILD
> > SUPPORT)Fw: COMPLAINT RE: GAL
> > > PERFORMANCE AND CONDUCT/
> DORIS
> > MACKEY REPRESENTING FL GAL
> > > ORANGE COUNTY COMPLAINT
> INCLUDES
> > THAT THE GAL REPRESENTATIVE
> > > ALSO KNEW ABOUT HISTORICAL
> DATA
> > OMITTED FROM TESTIMONY Fw:
> > > (CASE DP1140 DIV 7/OMITTED:
> > INTENTIONAL BIASEDNESS
> > > concurrent court proceedings
> FL
> > DCF KNEW ABOUT :NINTH
> > > DISTRICT HISTORICAL DATA DIV
> 38/42
> > PRECEEDING CLAIM BY DCF
> > > CPI FELICIA HANDLEY
> 2005DR14270
> > 08-24-2004 Petition for
> > > paternity entered Service
> denied
> > 09-24-2004 Petition to
> > > establish paternity denied
> > Respondent petitioned to dismiss
> > > paternity 11-08-2004
> 05-05-2006
> > Final judgment granted on
> > > paternity 10-19-2010 Final
> > judgment for child support
> > > entered 10-22-2010 Order for
> > income deduction 11-29-2010
> > > Notice of change of address
> > 12-28-2010 Petition heard to
> > > establish child support
> 01-14-2011
> > Returned mail 01-04-2011
> > > Motion to set arrears
> entered
> > 01-04-2011 Notice and hearing
> > > 02-14-2011 Hearing to set
> arrears
> > 01/28/2011 Plaintiff
> > > petitions for the need for
> custody
> > denied 02/04/2011) Fw:
> > > Attorney
> > Misconduct/Resubmitted/Attorney
> Details Needed Per
> > > Request PROSECUTOR’S ROLE
> IN
> > ADDRESSING SUSPECTED LAW
> > > ENFORCEMENT MISCONDUCT (a) If
> the
> > prosecutor has reason to
> > > suspect misconduct or
> unauthorized
> > illegal activity at any
> > > level of the prosecutor’s
> office
> > or in any agency or
> > > department engaged in a
> criminal
> > investigation, the
> > > prosecutor should promptly
> report
> > the suspicion and the
> > > reason for it to appropriate
> > supervisory personnel in the
> > > prosecutor’s office who
> have
> > authority to address the
> > > problem, or to the
> appropriate
> > inspector general’s office,
> > > or similar agency, if
> reporting
> > within the prosecutor’s
> > > own office is problematic.
> > Reporting may also be required to
> > > comply with requirements of
> the
> > applicable rules of
> > > professional conduct, the
> Model
> > Rules and the law of the
> > > jurisdiction. Sheila Jocelyn
> Shaw
> > %{attach}
> > >
> > > Attorney misconduct. Florida
> Duty
> > to
> > > report misconduct; code of
> conduct
> > The duty to report
> > > misconduct is one of the
> ethical o
> > imposed on attorneys in
> > > the United States by the
> rules
> > governing professional
> > > responsibility. With certain
> > exceptions, an attorney who
> > > becomes aware that either a
> fellow
> > attorney or a judge has
> > > committed an act in violation
> of
> > the rules of ethical
> > > conduct must report that
> > violation. Failure to do so
> > > subjects the attorney failing
> to
> > make the report to
> > > discipline.The duty extends
> only
> > to actual knowledge
> > > possessed by an attorney. An
> > attorney who has a mere
> > > suspicion of misconduct is
> not
> > required to report that
> > > suspicion, nor is the
> attorney
> > required to conduct any sort
> > > of investigation to confirm
> or
> > dispel that suspicion. The
> > > conduct at issue must rise to
> the
> > level of misconduct under
> > > the rules of professional
> > responsibility. Thus, an attorney
> > > who witnesses another
> attorney
> > become intoxicated, engage in
> > > adultery, or gamble away a
> large
> > sum of money is under no
> > > duty to report these acts
> because
> > they are not prohibited by
> > > the rules of professional
> > responsibility. Conduct that must
> > > be reported, on the other
> hand,
> > includes matters such as
> > > breaching client
> confidentiality,
> > misusing client funds,
> > > tampering with evidence,
> suborning
> > perjury, offering bribes,
> > > and committing criminal acts
> of
> > violence or dishonesty. https://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228
> > > 8-2.241 Civil Laws Governing
> Law
> > Enforcement Misconduct
> > > BUT ALSO LAWS THAT ARE FOR
> THE
> > PREVENTION OF NEGLECT OF THE
> > > CHILD. 827.03 Abuse,
> aggravated
> > abuse, and neglect of a
> > > child; penalties.— All
> > historical case proceedings
> > > associated with FL Dept of
> Rev.
> > Child Support
> > > Enforcement/TANF
> participation
> > & Medicaid participation
> > > relative to court proceedings
> were
> > filed and available
> > > including court filings and
> shared
> > RISs regional information
> > > sharing system btwn OCSE
> & DCF
> > departments; FL DCF Case
> > > #9457320158 (RFA CASE NUMBER
> > 1143172973) Ineffective
> > > counsel/representation,fraud
> to
> > commence proceedings FL ACAP
> > > Complaint ATTY DECEIT,
> > goo.gl/h9wjQr SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ
> 41221
> > > CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498,
> > COLLUSION #OIG #fraud, PUBLIC LAW
> > > 108 - 21 #misconduct atty
> > deceit,collusion;Case No.
> > > 2002-DR-050423-I,IVD case
> > enforcement FL/PA/IN #misconduct,
> > > cases OC9901243 PA &
> > 02-83719047104532 PA Cause #
> > > 53C079704JP00189 IN
> 2005-01472 FL
> > 2010-DP 1170 FL CASE#s
> > > #misconduct,professional
> > misconduct cases:OC9901243 PA
> &
> > > 02-83719047104532 PA Cause #
> > 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472
> > > FL 2010-DP 1170 FL IN CASE
> >








Thursday, 14 September 2017

Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.545(d) requires the petitioner in a family law case to file with the court a notice of related cases, if any. Your circuit may also require this form to be filed even if there are no related cases. A case is considered related if  it involves the same parties, children, or issues and is pending when the family law case is filed; or  it affects the court’s jurisdiction to proceed- or  an order in the related case may conflict with an order on the same issues in the new case; or  an order in the new case may conflict with an order in the earlier case. This form is used to provide the required notice to the court. INTENTIONAL OMISSIONS, INTENTIONAL CONCEALMENT OF CONCURRENT HEARINGS ALREADY ON THE COURT CALENDAR FL DVD GPU FELICIA HANDLEY KNEW ABOUT WHEN SHE REQUESTED TO START A SECOND DEPENDENCY HEARING AFTER THE FIRST HEARING WITH JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ANTHONY JOHNSON DISMISSED HER CLAIM ON JANUARY 28TH 2011, http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2014/07/abuse-of-process-white-collar-crime.html?m=1

Standards on Prosecutorial Investigations- ETHNIC BIASEDNESS/ETHICAL INTIMIDATION/PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT )/URL http://goo.gl/upj2d9 ABUSE OF PROCESS WHITE COLLAR CRIME RACIAL PROFILING VIOLATION OF CHILDREN'S RIGHTS TO EQUAL ENFORCEMENT OF THE LAW COLOR OF LAW COMPLAINT PUBLIC CORRUPTION CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT/VAWA

Title VI (http://www.justice.gov/crt/about/cor/byagency/hhscrranprm.pdf)

ACAP THE FLORIDA BAR INQUIRY COMPLAINT FORM http://goo.gl/h9wjQr

THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (ACAP)

http://goo.gl/h9wjQr
COMPLAINT REGARDING FRAUD ON THE COURT
AGGRAVATED WHITE COLLAR CRIMINAL ACTIVITY
775.0844 1st Aggravated white collar crime

http://www.justice.gov/crt/about/cor/coord/titlevi.php

(CF OPERATING PROCEDURE  NO. 180-4

http://www.dcf.state.fl.us/admin/publications/cfops/180%20Inspector%20General%20%28CFOP%20180-XX%29/CFOP%20180-4,%20Mandatory%20Reporting%20Requirements%20to%20the%20Office%20of%20Inspector%20General.pdf

Tuesday, 5 September 2017

Rule 8.3. Reporting Professional Misconduct.

 (a)  A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, shall inform the appropriate professional authority.

 (b)  A lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for office shall inform the appropriate authority.

Wednesday, 16 August 2017

DUTY & FAILURE TO REPORT Rule 8.3(a) & FL DCF EMPLOYEE CONDUCT CF180-4 & Rule 60(d)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, yet courts have also used this doctrine to order dismissal or default under other rules where a litigant has stooped to the level of fraud on the court.1



All HHS and contract employees have a responsibility to assist in combating fraud, waste, and abuse in all departmental programs.

FL DCF EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT 
CF-180-4


Whistle-blower's Act
(F.S. 112.3187-112.31895)


Are you aware of serious allegations of wrongdoing on the part of a public employer or independent contractor?





The fraud-on-the-court doctrine as a  remedy under the rules of civil procedure, it must prove, by clear and convincing evidence

The fraud-on-the-court doctrine as a remedy under the rules of civil procedure, it must prove, by clear and convincing evidence


Wednesday, 19 July 2017

Mail: Florida Certification Board Attn: Ethics Investigator – Confidential 1715 S. Gadsden Street Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Email: lfarmer@flcertificationboard.org Subject Line: Ethics Complaint – Confidential Fax: 850-222-6247 Attn: Ethics Investigator – Confidential

Public policy/White Collar Criminal Acts/Attorney Misconduct involving racial profiling & hate group harassment


FL CPI 5617503201

False reporting that she knew would be classified as a violent crime, would involve subsequent legal causation including the  P.R.O.T.E.C.T. Act which is a PROSECUTORIAL TOOL INVESTIGATION AND MONITORING COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE CHILDREN AND THE DADS.

THAT WAS FEBRUARY OF 2011.
ALTHOUGH THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL WITHIN THE FLORIDA DCF CONFIRMED NO PARTICIPATION FROM FL DCF AGENTS (OFFICIALLY) OCCURRED AFTER THE ADJUDICATED CASE CLOSURE AS OF AUGUST 2011, HARASSMENT AND DEFAMATION CONTINUED AND ADDITIONAL FABRICATIONS BY PUBLIC OFFICERS CONTINUED TO EXONERATE HANDLEY'S FALSE MISSING CHILDREN'S/KIDNAPPING "STATEMENT" NOT CRIMINAL CHARGES SHE WROTE UP ON A GOVERNMENT OFFICE FORM AND DOCUMENT "DEPENDENCY ARRAIGNMENT " FORM, MISLEADING OTHERS THAT A CRIMINAL ARRAIGNMENT HAD ENSUED OR THAT I WAS INVOLVED IN A CRIME AGAINST CHILDREN CHARGE. FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS, INTENTIONAL ATTORNEY DECEIT FOR NONDISCLOSURE OF THE FIRST PAGE INCLUDING THESE FRAUDULENT STATEMENTS TO THE JUDGE, CONTINUING GENDER VIOLENCE/EXINTIMATE PARTNER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INVOLVING THE SAME PARTIES IN CONCURRENT FAMILY LAW CASES IN THE SAME NINTH DISTRICT COURTS ANOTHER DIVISIONS, PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING ALL PARTIES WERE ONGOING IN DIVISIONS 7 & 38/42.
ON THE PUBLIC CLERK OF COURT REGISTRIES AND FL DEPR REVENUE ATTY HISTORICAL DATA, INTENTIONALLY UNCONSOLIDATED.


https://goo.gl/9U5P5k




There are circumstances where failure to make a disclosure is the equivalent of an affirmative misrepresentation. The obligation prescribed in Rule 1.2(d) not to counsel a client to commit or assist the client in committing a fraud applies in litigation. Regarding compliance with Rule 1.2(d), see the Comment to that Rule. See also the Comment to Rule 8.4(b).


http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/06/9457320158-rfa-case-number-1143172973.html?m=1



After WHICH a number of harassing incidents and false claims were made during self help legal filings, petitions and online computer research, online filing and general use related to human rights including employment, academic and correspondence with other family members.


It is a crime for one or more persons acting under color of law willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive another person of any right protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. (18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242)


https://www2.ed.gov/offices/OCR/archives/Harassment/address1.html

The White Collar Crime Victim Protection statute includes a list of "white collar crimes" which includes theft, computer related crimes, misuse of public office and bribery. The crime requires proof of fraudulent conduct.
Under the statute a person commits an "aggravated white collar crime" when he or she engages in at least two white collar crimes that have the same or similar victims, intents, accomplices, results, or methods of commission, or that are otherwise related to each other by certain distinguishing characteristics. The statute is targeted towards crimes that are not isolated h but encompass a larger schemes involving fraudulent


Public policy/White Collar Criminal Acts/Attorney Misconduct involving racial profiling & hate group harassment FL CPI 5617503201 False reporting that she knew would be classified as a violent crime, would involve subsequent legal causation including the P.R.O.T.E.C.T. Act which is a PROSECUTORIAL TOOL INVESTIGATION AND MONITORING COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE CHILDREN AND THE DADS. THAT WAS FEBRUARY OF 2011. ALTHOUGH THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL WITHIN THE FLORIDA DCF CONFIRMED NO PARTICIPATION FROM FL DCF AGENTS (OFFICIALLY) OCCURRED AFTER THE ADJUDICATED CASE CLOSURE AS OF AUGUST 2011, HARASSMENT AND DEFAMATION CONTINUED AND ADDITIONAL FABRICATIONS BY PUBLIC OFFICERS CONTINUED TO EXONERATE HANDLEY'S FALSE MISSING CHILDREN'S/KIDNAPPING "STATEMENT" NOT CRIMINAL CHARGES SHE WROTE UP ON A GOVERNMENT OFFICE FORM AND DOCUMENT "DEPENDENCY ARRAIGNMENT " FORM, MISLEADING OTHERS THAT A CRIMINAL ARRAIGNMENT HAD ENSUED OR THAT I WAS INVOLVED IN A CRIME AGAINST CHILDREN CHARGE. FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS, INTENTIONAL ATTORNEY DECEIT FOR NONDISCLOSURE OF THE FIRST PAGE INCLUDING THESE FRAUDULENT STATEMENTS TO THE JUDGE, CONTINUING GENDER VIOLENCE/EXINTIMATE PARTNER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INVOLVING THE SAME PARTIES IN CONCURRENT FAMILY LAW CASES IN THE SAME NINTH DISTRICT COURTS ANOTHER DIVISIONS, PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING ALL PARTIES WERE ONGOING IN DIVISIONS 7 & 38/42. ON THE PUBLIC CLERK OF COURT REGISTRIES AND FL DEPR REVENUE ATTY HISTORICAL DATA, INTENTIONALLY UNCONSOLIDATED. https://goo.gl/9U5P5k


The Department of Revenue has implemented an administrative process to establish child support orders, and this process includes specific procedures designed to protect due process and ensure parents’ access to the court system. While this process has the potential to improve program outcomes, it has not yet produced the expected number of support orders. While the process is somewhat faster than establishing orders through the courts, it takes an average of over seven months to complete, and costs for administrative hearings are higher than those for judicial hearings http://www.oppaga.state.fl.us/Summary.aspx?reportNum=c http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0100-0199/0120/0120.html

PART ONE (See Page 1, PART ONE - Complainant Information.): Complaint Details Legal Cause and Tortious Injury (As a result of the fraudulent acts/omissions, and deceit by attorney and departmental employee whereas deprivation of rights involved those rights of the minors and the natural parent and mother) *FRAUD ON THE COURT TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS On the part of the attorney herein and afore mentioned in proceedings: Duty to report misconduct; code of conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA JOCELYN SHAW PARTY TO THE COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S) PART TWO (See Page 1, PART TWO - Attorney Information FLORIDA BAR MEMBER(S): SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS MACKEY GAL- PART T H R E E (See Page 1, PART T H R E E - Facts/Allegations.): The specific thing or things I am complaining about are: (attach additional sheets as necessary) "Fraud. Rule 3.3 Candor Toward The Tribunal - Comment [1] This Rule governs the conduct of a lawyer who is representing a client in the proceedings of a tribunal. See Rule 1.0(m) for the definition of "tribunal." It also applies when the lawyer is representing a client in an ancillary proceeding conducted pursuant to the tribunal’s adjudicative authority, such as a deposition. Thus, for example, paragraph (a)(3) requires a lawyer to take reasonable remedial measures if the lawyer comes to know that a client who is testifying in a deposition has offered evidence that is false. [2] This Rule sets forth the special duties of lawyers as officers of the court to avoid conduct that undermines the integrity of the adjudicative process. A lawyer acting as an advocate in an adjudicative proceeding has an obligation to present the client's case with persuasive force. Performance of that duty while maintaining confidences of the client, however, is qualified by the advocate's duty of candor to the tribunal. Consequently, although a lawyer in an adversary proceeding is not required to present an impartial exposition of the law or to vouch for the evidence submitted in a cause, the lawyer must not allow the tribunal to be misled by false statements of law or fact or evidence that the lawyer knows to be false." State employee misconduct which resulted in material injuries and legal causation: *Police stalking. Conspired with FL DCF STATE EMPLOYEE EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT, CPI NUMBER 5617503201 http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/?m=1 9457320158 (RFA CASE NUMBER 1143172973) insurance covering dental/medical Dr. Obeori & Dr.Nau (Michyl, Isis) http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/02/httpflcertificationboardorg.html?m=1 Firm associated with complaint. Interstate stalking and trespassing related to a divorcee case. Hershkowitz Russell S Attorney : Fw: ADMINISTRATIVE 92-1; In all family law cases in which a trial is anticipated, the attorney shall submit a notice that the cause is at issue.- intentional omissions; w: Mr. Williams is refusing visitation with the minor contrary to the oral &amp; written child visitation with Atty Wayne Starr at the last hearing 8/30/2011- subsequent modification petitions have been submitted resulting in excuses by court administration, lastly stating a parental responsibility packet is needed- THERE IS NO PRESUMPTIVE FATHERHOOD STATUE APPLICABLE, UNWED AT BIRTH AND CISTODY BTW 2007 THRU 2011 WAS WITH THE MOTHERHOOD. THERE IS NO CHANCE OF RESOLUTION OF ANY INTIMATE PARTNER RELATIONSHIP &amp; WILLIAMS AND SEVERAL OF HIS FAMILY TIES HAVE REPEATED ENGAGED IN OFFENSIVE BEHAVIOURS AND PROPERTY THEFTS MONETARY CLAIMS PRECEEDING THE ACTUAL JUDGEMENT FOR SUPPORT Fw: Court Administration employee misconduct/judicial misconduct- unconscionable delays &amp; biased proceedings, concealed concurtent criminal proceeding involving Jarrid Williams 2/2011/ continuing domestic violence&amp; abuse of the child support order by law enforcement personnel , domestic violence > To: info@idvaac.org > Cc: "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial" , "Judicial" , "Judicial Committee" > Date: Friday, March 17, 2017, 8:25 PM omissions: unconsolidated cases/related cases whereas information therein would substantially affect those involved such as that of concurrent criminal nonsupport proceedings against the plaintiff/paternal fathers to case- as indicative on the Lidia Gardner Clerk of Court Registries http://icpcstatepages.org/florida/criminalbackground/ 39.0138 Criminal history and other records checks; limit on placement of a child— (1) The department shall conduct a records check through the State Automated Child Welfare Information System (SACWIS) and a local and statewide criminal history records check on all persons, including parents, being considered by the department for placement of a child under this chapter, including all non-relative placement decisions, and all members of the household, 12 years of age and older, of the person being considered. For purposes of this section, a criminal history records check may include, but is not limited to, submission of fingerprints to the Department of Law Enforcement for processing and forwarding to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for state and national criminal history information, and local criminal records checks through local law enforcement agencies of all household members 18 years of age and older and other visitors to the home. An out-of-state criminal history records check must be initiated for any person 18 years of age or older who resided in another state if that state allows the release of such records. The department shall establish by rule standards for evaluating any information contained in the automated system relating to a person who must be screened for purposes of making a placement decision. 1. Chapter 560, relating to the Money Transmitters’ Code. 2. Chapter 812, relating to theft, robbery, and related crimes. 3. Chapter 815, relating to computer-related crimes. 4. Chapter 817, relating to fraudulent practices. 5. Chapter 825, relating to abuse, neglect, and exploitation of elderly persons and disabled adults. 6. Chapter 831, relating to forgery and counterfeiting. 7. Chapter 832, relating to the issuance of worthless checks and drafts. 8. Chapter 838, relating to bribery and misuse of public office. 9. Chapter 839, relating to offenses by public officers and employees. 10. Chapter 895, relating to offenses concerning racketeering and illegal debts. 11. Chapter 896, relating to offenses related to financial transactions. (b) A felony offense that is committed with intent to defraud or that involves a conspiracy to defraud. (c) A felony offense that is committed with intent to temporarily or permanently deprive a person of his or her property or that involves a conspiracy to temporarily or permanently deprive a person of his or her property. (d) A felony offense that involves or results in the commission of fraud or deceit upon a person or that involves a conspiracy to commit fraud or deceit upon a person. (4) As used in this section, “aggravated white collar crime” means engaging in at least two white collar crimes that have the same or similar intents, results, accomplices, victims, or methods of commission, or that are otherwise interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated incidents, provided that at least one of such crimes occurred after the effective date of this act. (5) Any person who commits an aggravated white collar crime as defined in this section and in so doing either: (a) Victimizes 10 or more elderly persons, as defined in s. 825.101; (b) Victimizes 20 or more persons, as defined in s. 1.01; or (c) Victimizes the State of Florida, any state agency, any of the state’s political subdivisions, or any agency of the state’s political subdivisions, and thereby obtains or attempts to obtain $50,000 or more, commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. *concurrent court proceedings FL DCF KNEW ABOUT :NINTH DISTRICT HISTORICAL DATA DIV 38/42 PRECEEDING CLAIM BY DCF CPI FELICIA HANDLEY 2005DR14270 08-24-2004 Petition for paternity entered Service denied 09-24-2004 Petition to establish paternity denied Respondent petitioned to dismiss paternity 11-08-2004 05-05-2006 Final judgment granted on paternity 10-19-2010 Final judgment for child support entered 10-22-2010 Order for income deduction 11-29-2010 Notice of change of address 12-28-2010 Petition heard to establish child support 01-14-2011 Returned mail 01-04-2011 Motion to set arrears entered 01-04-2011 Notice and hearing 02-14-2011 Hearing to set arrears 01/28/2011 Plaintiff petitions for the need for custody denied 02/04/2011 THE SPECIFIC THING OR THINGS I AM COMPLAINING ABOUT ARE: 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242). "Color of law" simply means that the person doing the act is using power given to him or her by a governmental agency (local, State, or Federal). A law enforcement officer acts "under color of law" even if he or she is exceeding his or her rightful power. THAT ON THE ONSET OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA SHAW, AS THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION 7, ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT: Juvenile Division 2000 E. Michigan St.Suite 300 Orlando, FL 32806 PROCEEDINGS (WAIVED NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD TO BE IN WRITING- WAIVED BY THE JUDGE) WERE COMMENCED WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE HISTORICAL DATA AND CONCURRENT CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS, AND HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS CONCURRENTLY PUBLISHED IN DIVISION 42 COURT, VIA CLERK OF THE ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE RISS DATABASE, THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR ACCOUNTS OF INTERAGENCY ACCESS WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. THE COMPLAINANT MAKES REFERENCE THAT THE ATTORNEY’S, WITH KNOWLEDGE, ACTED IN A DECEITFUL MANNER, NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF FRAUD RELATIVE TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS. *Duty to report misconduct; code of conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA JOCELYN SHAW PARTY TO THE COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S) 1. Chapter 560, relating to the Money Transmitters’ Code. 2. Chapter 812, relating to theft, robbery, and related crimes. 3. Chapter 815, relating to computer-related crimes. 4. Chapter 817, relating to fraudulent practices. 5. Chapter 825, relating to abuse, neglect, and exploitation of elderly persons and disabled adults. 6. Chapter 831, relating to forgery and counterfeiting. 7. Chapter 832, relating to the issuance of worthless checks and drafts. 8. Chapter 838, relating to bribery and misuse of public office. 9. Chapter 839, relating to offenses by public officers and employees. 10. Chapter 895, relating to offenses concerning racketeering and illegal debts. 11. Chapter 896, relating to offenses related to financial transactions. (b) A felony offense that is committed with intent to defraud or that involves a conspiracy to defraud. (c) A felony offense that is committed with intent to temporarily or permanently deprive a person of his or her property or that involves a conspiracy to temporarily or permanently deprive a person of his or her property. (d) A felony offense that involves or results in the commission of fraud or deceit upon a person or that involves a conspiracy to commit fraud or deceit upon a person. (4) As used in this section, “aggravated white collar crime” means engaging in at least two white collar crimes that have the same or similar intents, results, accomplices, victims, or methods of commission, or that are otherwise interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated incidents, provided that at least one of such crimes occurred after the effective date of this act. (5) Any person who commits an aggravated white collar crime as defined in this section and in so doing either: (a) Victimizes 10 or more elderly persons, as defined in s. 825.101; (b) Victimizes 20 or more persons, as defined in s. 1.01; or (c) Victimizes the State of Florida, any state agency, any of the state’s political subdivisions, or any agency of the state’s political subdivisions, and thereby obtains or attempts to obtain $50,000 or more, commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. ACAP BAR COMPLAINT DETAILS/PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS VIOLATIONS. Fw: EMPLOYEE MISCOND KUCT (hate crimes, continuing domestic violence after breaking up with Williams) CF180-4 ( per your publication, the SCOPE of guidelines, goverance of employee ethical and professional conduct states: “Fraud” means to commit an intentional violation of law or a deliberate misrepresentation or concealment so as to secure unfair or unlawful financial or personal gain.) In this case whereas fraud in the manner and form constituting DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, PUBLIC OFFICER/ATTORNEY DECEIT, COLLUSION, that he/she did KNOWINGLY WITH INTENT TO COMMIT AGGRAVATED (COMPOUNDED) SEMITIC HATE, ETHNICALLY BIASED CRIMINAL TORTS, DURESS AND EMOTIONAL ABUSE AND ALIENATION TO THE MOTHER WHO WAS ALREADY A VICTIM OF ABUSE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN THE MANNER AND FORMS OF EXINTIMATE PARTNER & FAMILY VIOLENCE, PERSONALITY TORTS AND FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS, AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RELATED TO PRECEEDING ASCERTAINMENT PURSUITS THROUGH ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL ACTIONS WHICH WERE INTENTIONALLY AND "SELECTIVELY" BIASED IN APPLICATION OF THE LAWS BOTH FEDERAL AND STATE STATUTORY APPLICATION TO CHILD CUSTODY, CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION, RECOVERY AND DISBURSEMENT, WITH AN ACT OF VIOLENCE OCCURRING FEBRUARY 4TH 2011 IN THE ABATEMENT OF CHILD DUPPORT FROM THE PRECEEDING MONTH OF COLLECTION JANUARY 2011, AFTER JUDGEMENT REIDERED ON DECEMBER 22ND, 2010 LESS THAN 60(SIXTY DAYS) THAT EMPLOYEE KNOWLEDGE THRU THE RISS INFORMATION SHARING SYSTEM PROMPTED MALICIOUS, RETALIATORY STATEMENT TO INTERFER WITH FL SDU DISBURSEMENT, REVERSING THE JANUARY PAYMENT AFTER FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDING ONSET AGAIN AFTER AN EARLY DISMISSAL ON JANUARY 28TH, 2011, BOTH OF WHICH INITIAL CLAIM WERE OMITTED DUE TO EMPLOYEE FRAUD/MISCONDUCT


White Collar Fraud participant. Program abuse/court record omissions imposed a biased prejudice in judicial proceedings, concealment of criminal nonsupport histories of the payernal dad and domestic violence against the mother, natural parent. Ethnic intimidation on false allegations of kidnapping based on program employee misconduct involing Orange County Sheriff employee misconduct, family violence personality torts. The mother has no criminal history constituting violent crimes or kidnapping/missing children criminal charges nor child abuse as alleged personality torts were used to slander and defame the mother by the paternal dad's familt ties working in law enforcement. The incident involves retaliatory harassment related to a family violence situation in another state and county in which the paternal dad alleged that the mother's daughter was a participant in parental alienation and divorcee proceedings. Harassment that was setup through family ties wirking in administrative venue. Complaint involves neglience, FL DCF employee violations of administrative policies wherein it is clearly defined what constitutes employee misconduct, fraud. All parties knew of procedure based upon "duty of care", the greater responsibilty in reporting misconduct was tge responsibilty of the other employees and attorneys who routinely handle cases and are subject to administrative policies, statutory obligations and professional responsibilities under model policies of domestic violence, juvenile courts, FL DCF employee handbook code of conduct and which representation is suppose to enforce a fair and equal protection under the law. CF180-4 Complaint against: Devereux Florida Foster Care Program Orange/Osceola/Seminole County 5749 Westgate Drive, Suite 102 ~ Orlando, FL 32835 Phone: 321.441.1567 Fax: 321.281.3887 PERSONALITY TORTS TORTS OF FRAUD TO DEFAME CHARACTER OF THE MOTHER AS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PERPETUATED BY STATE EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT, CPI NUMBER 5617503201; Fw: Fwd: ATTACHED AFFIDAVIT ON DATE OF FALSE ALLEGATION BY CPI-ETHNIC BIASNESS/RACIAL PROFILING COMPLAINT;Fw: CPI 5617503201 EMERGENCY RESPONSE FALSE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED TO LAW ENFORCEMENT REGARDING CHILD CUSTODY - THE NATURAL PARENT, MOTHER HAD CUSTODY resubmitted the ACAP CONSUMER ASSISTANCE COMPLAINT/ACAP ATTY COMPLAINT/ INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM/INTENTIONALLY OMITTED FRAUDULENT STATEMENT , fraud and white collar criminal behavior 39.0141 A Missing Children Report is Required and is found to be absent in all proceedings prior to date. & 95.11 Tort actions for fraud or assault &39.0014,39.0141 MISSING CHILDRENS REPORT REQUIRED TO: CC / BCC: FROM:  SUBJECT: Fw: resubmitted the ACAP CONSUMER ASSISTANCE COMPLAINT/ACAP ATTY COMPLAINT/ INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM/INTENTIONALLY OMITTED FRAUDULENT STATEMENT , fraud and white collar criminal behavior 39.0141 A Missing Children Report is Required and is found to be absent in all proceedings prior to date. & 95.11 Tort actions for fraud or assault &39.0014,39.0141 MISSING CHILDRENS REPORT REQUIRED Choose File Original Message On Jan 9, 2017, at 9:30 AM, Sheila Shaw wrote: From: Sheila Shaw ; To: Nine09digits ; Sheila Jocelyn ; Subject: resubmitted the ACAP CONSUMER ASSISTANCE COMPLAINT/ACAP ATTY COMPLAINT/ INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM Sent: Fri, Jan 6, 2017 9:39:00 PM ACAP ATTY COMPLAINT/ INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA JOCELYN SHAW 863 EAST WESTMORELAND ST. PHILADELPHIA, PA 19134 (PREVIOUS ADDRESS OF WHICH COMPLAINT WAS SUBMITTED:PO BOX 5147, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33657-5175) FRAUD ON THE COURT TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM ATTACHED DOCUMENT TO THE FLORIDA BAR PARTY TO THE COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S) FLORIDA BAR MEMBER(S): SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS MACKEY GAL- Ana Elena Tangel-Rodriguez Eligible to Practice Law in Florida Bar Number: 254304 Mail Address:Tangel-Rodriguez and Associates Tangel-Rodriguez & Assoc 222 Weber St Orlando, FL 32803-3831 United States Office: 407-849-1133 Email:cselsp@att.net Personal Bar URL: www.floridabar.org/mybarprofile/254304 RUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire= Retained 407-786-2889( 1110 Douglas > Ave > Altamonte Springs, FL> 32714 > (407)> 786-2889 > http://www.russellhlaw.com THE SPECIFIC THING OR THINGS I AM COMPLAINING ABOUT ARE: 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242). "Color of law" simply means that the person doing the act is using power given to him or her by a governmental agency (local, State, or Federal). A law enforcement officer acts "under color of law" even if he or she is exceeding his or her rightful power. THAT ON THE ONSET OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA SHAW, AS THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION 7, ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT: Juvenile Division 2000 E. Michigan St.Suite 300 Orlando, FL 32806 PROCEEDINGS (WAIVED NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD TO BE IN WRITING- WAIVED BY THE JUDGE) WERE COMMENCED WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE HISTORICAL DATA AND CONCURRENT CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS, AND HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS CONCURRENTLY PUBLISHED IN DIVISION 42 COURT, VIA CLERK OF THE ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE RISS DATABASE, THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR ACCOUNTS OF INTERAGENCY ACCESS WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. THE COMPLAINANT MAKES REFERENCE THAT THE ATTORNEY’S, WITH KNOWLEDGE, ACTED IN A DECEITFUL MANNER, NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF FRAUD RELATIVE TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS. Fraud Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141: makes it unlawful for state or local law enforcement agencies to allow officers to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives persons of rights protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. This law is commonly referred to as the Police Misconduct Statute. the exintimate partner and public officer employee misconduct BUSINESS TORT RELATED-ADVERSARIAL TORTS OR MATERNAL INJURIES WITH INTENT http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer_29.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/any-police-department-receiving-federal.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/family-violence-prevention-act-victim.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/false-cpi-personal-torts-tort-of-fraud.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/jarrid-williams-probation-dc-346801.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/201 Federal laws Federal law 42 U.S.C. § 5772 & 42 U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5772) defines a "missing child" as "any individual less than 18 years of age whose whereabouts are unknown to such individual"s legal custodian." RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. "ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW WERE DIVESTED AND SUBSEQUENT LEGAL CAUSATION INCLUSIVE OF : 1. A MATERIAL INJURY IN THE PROCEEDINGS BELOW THAT CANNOT BE CONCLUDED ON POST JUDGEMENT APPEAL,2. INJURY WAS CAUSED BY A DEPARTURE FORM THE ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW (WHEN THEY ARE VIOLATED) OCCURRED. IMPROPER PURPOSE USED TO ACCESS TO THE FACILITY/HARASSMENT & TORTS) CONTINUATION OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT Fw: REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION TO REOPEN CASE CASE NO 2005-DR-014270-O DIVISION 42; Fw: ATTN KEITH PARKS Action founded on negligence, fraud and white collar criminal behavior 39.0141 A Missing Children Report is Required and is found to be absent in all proceedings prior to date. & 95.11 Tort actions for fraud or assault & 39.0014,39.0141 MISSING CHILDRENS REPORT REQUIRED WHICH IN ITS ABSENCE AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS CONSTITUTES FRAUD. TORT ACTIONS OF FRAUD INCLUSIVE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND VAWA BY THE FATHERS TO CASE WHO KNEW THE ALLEGATIONS WERE FALSE THE ATTORNEY’S TO CASE DID NOT CONSOLIDATE THE TWO DIVISIONS, DIVISION 7 AND DIVISION 42, WITH KNOWLEDGE THAT A “THRESHOLD OF DEMONSTRATIVE SHOWING OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT” IN ADDITION TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CHILD WOULD BE NECESSARY UNDER PROVISIONS OUTLINED REGARDING MINORS TO JUVENILE DEPENDENCY COURT CIVIL RULES OF PRACTICE, FLORIDA STATUTES CHAPTER 39. PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO CHILDREN THE DEVASTATION FROM THE PRESIDING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL PROCESS ALONG WITH THE STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT, ATTORNEY DECEIT INCLUDED THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS: § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. Civil contempt is conduct directed against the rights of the opposing party law-imposed obligation ;"an act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere with the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the dignity of the court or respect for its authority. There are two kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct contempt openly and in the presence of the court, resists the power of the court, 102 A. 400, 406; and consequential, or constructive contempt results from matters outside the court, such as failure to comply with orders. The basic standards governing fraud on the court are reasonably straightforward. As set forth in Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998): The requisite fraud on the court occurs where “it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.” Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989) . . . . The trial court has the inherent authority, within the exercise of sound judicial discretion, to dismiss an action when a plaintiff has perpetrated a fraud on the court, or where a party refuses to comply with court orders. Kornblum v. Schneider, 609 So. 2d 138, 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). CONCURRENT PROCEEDINGS THAT POSED A BIAS IN SUBSEQUENT CHILD CUSTODY PROCEEDINGS IN THE JUVENILLE COURT 7TH DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY COURTS Duty to report misconduct; code of conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA JOCELYN SHAW PARTY TO THE COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S) FLORIDA BAR MEMBER(S): SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS MACKEY GAL- “IN THE BEST INTERESTS OFTHE CHILD”, THE CHILD HAS THE RIGHT TO EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW/WHEREAS THE OMISSIONS RELATIVE TO THE CASE PROCEEDINGS PRESENTED A BIAS AND NONDISCLOSURE OF EXISTING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CONCURRENT WITH PROCEEDINGS WHICH AFFECTED THE CHILD, THE ECONOMIC DIVESTATION FROM FINANCIAL SUPPORT, LEGALLY DEFINED WITHIN THE MODEL POLICY OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE THAT THERE EXISTS ECONOMIC TORTS AND ABUSE REGARDING INTENTIONAL REFUSAL TO SUPPORT THE CHILD OF WHICH PATERNITY HAD BEEN ESTABLISHED 5 (5 X 365 DAYS) IN THE CASE OF CARLOS GONZALEZ AND IN THE CASE OF JARRID DESHAUN WILLIAMS THAT P0ROCEEDING WERE ON THE JUDICIAL CALENDAR IN THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT WITH A WITHDRAWAL ON FEBRAURY 14TH 2011 (COINCIDENTALLY AFTER THE ISSUANCE OF A TEMPORARY MODIFICATION OF CHILD CUSTODY, COINCIDENTALLY AFTER A CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT TO THE FLORIDA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT BY CARLOS GONZALEZ IN JANUARY FOR THE MONTY OF JANUARY 2011, AFTER THE FINAL JUDGEMENT FOR A CURRENT SUPPORT ORDER HAD BEEN ISSUED DECEMBER 22ND, 2010) VIOLATIONS INCLUDE: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NON SUPPORT & CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY ACT VIOLATION(COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENTS- TITLE 42, FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW VIOLATIONS: REQUIREMENT OF STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED PROCEDURES TO IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] (a) In order to satisfy section 454(20)(A), each State must have in effect laws requiring the use of the following procedures, consistent with this section and with regulations of the Secretary, to increase the effectiveness of the program which the State administers under this part: Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] (a (C) Voluntary paternity acknowledgment.— (iv) Use of paternity acknowledgment affidavit. —Such procedures must require the State to develop and use an affidavit for the voluntary acknowledgment of paternity which includes the minimum requirements of the affidavit specified by the Secretary under section 452(a)(7) for the voluntary acknowledgment of paternity, and to give full faith and credit to such an affidavit signed in any other State according to its procedures. Heather Morcroft (Appellate Atty) 20 n Orange Ave Ste 700 Orlando 32801 FBN 0709859 407-325-3585 Letter regarding fraud on the court, absent administrative remedy or action in a timely manner, that such a biasedness occurred it is described as unconscionably ethnically biased, a white collar criminal act by a party who misused his/her office to aid and assist avoidance of judicial action, that the action was in violation of the minor to case’s rights, that the action was in violation of parental rights to recovery of child support and paternity establishment in the Orange County, Ninth Judicial Circuit and Court, Division 42. Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:39 PM Subject: ATTORNEY GENERAL COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST Hershkowitz Russell S Attorney Category: Bankruptcy Law [Edit] 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 (407) 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com Thank you for contacting the Attorney General's Office regarding ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT . Our staff will process it as soon as possible and, if necessary, respond appropriately. We appreciate hearing from concerned citizens such as yourself. If you wish to keep abreast of the activities of this office, you may wish to consider a subscription to our electronic newsletter Weekly Briefing. Or perhaps our Consumer Alerts. Should you wish to subscribe to either, or both, publications, please visit our subscription page. COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST RUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire= Retained 407-786-2889( 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 (407) 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com COMMENT ENTERED ON FEBRUARY 14TH, 2011- OSCE FL DEPT OF REVENUE PETITIONED THE COURT TO WITHDRAW THE MOTION TO RECOVER BACK OWED OR RETROACTIVE CHILD SUPPORT SUBSEQUENT TO JUVENILE PROCEEDINGS. THE STATED MOTIONS STATES “THAT THE REPRESENTATION IS BEING WITHDRAWN AND THE PETITION IS WITHDRAWN DUE TO “QUESTIONABLE ARREARAGES OWED”- A BIASED STATEMENT WITHOU INQUIRY AND PRESENTATION OF THE FACTS OF RECORD AVAILABLE TO ALL FL DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES- FLORIDA- LEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DIVISION, AND FL DEPT OF REV. CHILD SUPPORT DIV.- THE ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT REGISTER OF ACTIONS MAINTAINS ALL PARTIES TO THE CASE(S) PATERNITY AND CHILD SUPPORT HISTORICAL DATA, ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS- WHICH ARE ABSENT IN PROCEEDINGS CONSTITUTING UNCONSCIONABLE DELAYS – IN THE CASE OF CARLOS GONZALEZ – THE PATERNITY CASE LASTED BETWEEN 2002 – 2006- RESUMING WITH A FILING OF PATERNITY CASE NUMBER IN 2005 FOR THE JUDGEMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT WHICH WE DO NOT SEE ENTERED AS A FINANL JUDGEMENT UNTIL DECEBMER 22, 2010- A PERIOD BETWEEN 2005-2010 (FIVE YEARS – DELAYED ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS- ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT) VAWA REPORT REGARDING NOT ONLY ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT IN CHILD CUSTODY MODIFICATION Intentionally omitted criminal nonsupport, offensive behaviour, professional misconduct and ethnic biasedness, child exploitation and institutional racism Title 42 section 42 1983, 14141 attorney prosecutorial child chustody exploitation including false statements never heard throughout case trial activity, false statements to commence proceedings Case Type:Paternity Date Filed:4/24/2002 Location:Div 38 UCN:482002DR006249A001OX Judge: Patricia A Doherty BARBARA FANCHER (LIMITED) JONES, > Esquire > Retained 407-849-1133(W) > Respondent GONZALEZ, CARLOS ALBERTO > Events & Orders of > the Court DISPOSITIONS > 05/15/2012 > Order Denying (Judicial > Officer: Evans, Robert M) CC: ACAP/THE REGIONAL/DISTRICT & OIG DID NOT COMPLY WITH OR THE WAS A FAILURE TO REPORT ( https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/report-fraud/) attached ethical complaint form regarding FL CPI CERTIFICATION FOR MISCONDUCT COMPLAINTS; Fw: ORGANIZED CRIME BETWEEN ATTYS FI FL DCF, GAL, CPI WHO INTENTIONAL COMMITTED FRAUDS, EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT, PERSONALITY TORTS & FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS IN COURT HARSSMENT DURING THE MOTHER AND NATURAL PARENT'S POSTSECONDARY ENROLLMENT & THEREAFTER DURING EMPLOYABILITY RECRUITING, LIBELOUS STATEMENT WERE MADE WHICH HAVE NO VALIDITY WHILE ABSCOUNDING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT & RECOVERY OF RETROACTIVE CHILD SUPPORT)Fw: COMPLAINT RE: GAL PERFORMANCE AND CONDUCT/ DORIS MACKEY REPRESENTING FL GAL ORANGE COUNTY COMPLAINT INCLUDES THAT THE GAL REPRESENTATIVE ALSO KNEW ABOUT HISTORICAL DATA OMITTED FROM TESTIMONY Fw: (CASE DP1140 DIV 7/OMITTED: INTENTIONAL BIASEDNESS concurrent court proceedings FL DCF KNEW ABOUT :NINTH DISTRICT HISTORICAL DATA DIV 38/42 PRECEEDING CLAIM BY DCF CPI FELICIA HANDLEY 2005DR14270 08-24-2004 Petition for paternity entered Service denied 09-24-2004 Petition to establish paternity denied Respondent petitioned to dismiss paternity 11-08-2004 05-05-2006 Final judgment granted on paternity 10-19-2010 Final judgment for child support entered 10-22-2010 Order for income deduction 11-29-2010 Notice of change of address 12-28-2010 Petition heard to establish child support 01-14-2011 Returned mail 01-04-2011 Motion to set arrears entered 01-04-2011 Notice and hearing 02-14-2011 Hearing to set arrears 01/28/2011 Plaintiff petitions for the need for custody denied 02/04/2011) Fw: Attorney Misconduct/Resubmitted/Attorney Details Needed Per Request PROSECUTOR’S ROLE IN ADDRESSING SUSPECTED LAW ENFORCEMENT MISCONDUCT (a) If the prosecutor has reason to suspect misconduct or unauthorized illegal activity at any level of the prosecutor’s office or in any agency or department engaged in a criminal investigation, the prosecutor should promptly report the suspicion and the reason for it to appropriate supervisory personnel in the prosecutor’s office who have authority to address the problem, or to the appropriate inspector general’s office, or similar agency, if reporting within the prosecutor’s own office is problematic. Reporting may also be required to comply with requirements of the applicable rules of professional conduct, the Model Rules and the law of the jurisdiction. Sheila Jocelyn Shaw %{attach}

Attorney misconduct. Florida Duty to report misconduct; code of conduct The duty to report misconduct is one of the ethical o imposed on attorneys in the United States by the rules governing professional responsibility. With certain exceptions, an attorney who becomes aware that either a fellow attorney or a judge has committed an act in violation of the rules of ethical conduct must report that violation. Failure to do so subjects the attorney failing to make the report to discipline.The duty extends only to actual knowledge possessed by an attorney. An attorney who has a mere suspicion of misconduct is not required to report that suspicion, nor is the attorney required to conduct any sort of investigation to confirm or dispel that suspicion. The conduct at issue must rise to the level of misconduct under the rules of professional responsibility. Thus, an attorney who witnesses another attorney become intoxicated, engage in adultery, or gamble away a large sum of money is under no duty to report these acts because they are not prohibited by the rules of professional responsibility. Conduct that must be reported, on the other hand, includes matters such as breaching client confidentiality, misusing client funds, tampering with evidence, suborning perjury, offering bribes, and committing criminal acts of violence or dishonesty. https://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 8-2.241 Civil Laws Governing Law Enforcement Misconduct BUT ALSO LAWS THAT ARE FOR THE PREVENTION OF NEGLECT OF THE CHILD. 827.03 Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; penalties.— All historical case proceedings associated with FL Dept of Rev. Child Support Enforcement/TANF participation & Medicaid participation relative to court proceedings were filed and available including court filings and shared RISs regional information sharing system btwn OCSE & DCF departments; FL DCF Case #9457320158 (RFA CASE NUMBER 1143172973) Ineffective counsel/representation,fraud to commence proceedings FL ACAP Complaint ATTY DECEIT, goo.gl/h9wjQr SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498, COLLUSION #OIG #fraud, PUBLIC LAW 108 - 21 #misconduct atty deceit,collusion;Case No. 2002-DR-050423-I,IVD case enforcement FL/PA/IN #misconduct, cases OC9901243 PA & 02-83719047104532 PA Cause # 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL 2010-DP 1170 FL CASE#s #misconduct,professional misconduct cases:OC9901243 PA & 02-83719047104532 PA Cause # 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL 2010-DP 1170 FL IN CASE #s