Wednesday, 16 August 2017

DUTY & FAILURE TO REPORT Rule 8.3(a) & FL DCF EMPLOYEE CONDUCT CF180-4 & Rule 60(d)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, yet courts have also used this doctrine to order dismissal or default under other rules where a litigant has stooped to the level of fraud on the court.1



All HHS and contract employees have a responsibility to assist in combating fraud, waste, and abuse in all departmental programs.

FL DCF EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT 
CF-180-4


Whistle-blower's Act
(F.S. 112.3187-112.31895)


Are you aware of serious allegations of wrongdoing on the part of a public employer or independent contractor?





The fraud-on-the-court doctrine as a  remedy under the rules of civil procedure, it must prove, by clear and convincing evidence

The fraud-on-the-court doctrine as a remedy under the rules of civil procedure, it must prove, by clear and convincing evidence


Wednesday, 19 July 2017

Mail: Florida Certification Board Attn: Ethics Investigator – Confidential 1715 S. Gadsden Street Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Email: lfarmer@flcertificationboard.org Subject Line: Ethics Complaint – Confidential Fax: 850-222-6247 Attn: Ethics Investigator – Confidential

Public policy/White Collar Criminal Acts/Attorney Misconduct involving racial profiling & hate group harassment


FL CPI 5617503201

False reporting that she knew would be classified as a violent crime, would involve subsequent legal causation including the  P.R.O.T.E.C.T. Act which is a PROSECUTORIAL TOOL INVESTIGATION AND MONITORING COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE CHILDREN AND THE DADS.

THAT WAS FEBRUARY OF 2011.
ALTHOUGH THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL WITHIN THE FLORIDA DCF CONFIRMED NO PARTICIPATION FROM FL DCF AGENTS (OFFICIALLY) OCCURRED AFTER THE ADJUDICATED CASE CLOSURE AS OF AUGUST 2011, HARASSMENT AND DEFAMATION CONTINUED AND ADDITIONAL FABRICATIONS BY PUBLIC OFFICERS CONTINUED TO EXONERATE HANDLEY'S FALSE MISSING CHILDREN'S/KIDNAPPING "STATEMENT" NOT CRIMINAL CHARGES SHE WROTE UP ON A GOVERNMENT OFFICE FORM AND DOCUMENT "DEPENDENCY ARRAIGNMENT " FORM, MISLEADING OTHERS THAT A CRIMINAL ARRAIGNMENT HAD ENSUED OR THAT I WAS INVOLVED IN A CRIME AGAINST CHILDREN CHARGE. FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS, INTENTIONAL ATTORNEY DECEIT FOR NONDISCLOSURE OF THE FIRST PAGE INCLUDING THESE FRAUDULENT STATEMENTS TO THE JUDGE, CONTINUING GENDER VIOLENCE/EXINTIMATE PARTNER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INVOLVING THE SAME PARTIES IN CONCURRENT FAMILY LAW CASES IN THE SAME NINTH DISTRICT COURTS ANOTHER DIVISIONS, PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING ALL PARTIES WERE ONGOING IN DIVISIONS 7 & 38/42.
ON THE PUBLIC CLERK OF COURT REGISTRIES AND FL DEPR REVENUE ATTY HISTORICAL DATA, INTENTIONALLY UNCONSOLIDATED.


https://goo.gl/9U5P5k




There are circumstances where failure to make a disclosure is the equivalent of an affirmative misrepresentation. The obligation prescribed in Rule 1.2(d) not to counsel a client to commit or assist the client in committing a fraud applies in litigation. Regarding compliance with Rule 1.2(d), see the Comment to that Rule. See also the Comment to Rule 8.4(b).


http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/06/9457320158-rfa-case-number-1143172973.html?m=1



After WHICH a number of harassing incidents and false claims were made during self help legal filings, petitions and online computer research, online filing and general use related to human rights including employment, academic and correspondence with other family members.


It is a crime for one or more persons acting under color of law willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive another person of any right protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. (18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242)


https://www2.ed.gov/offices/OCR/archives/Harassment/address1.html

The White Collar Crime Victim Protection statute includes a list of "white collar crimes" which includes theft, computer related crimes, misuse of public office and bribery. The crime requires proof of fraudulent conduct.
Under the statute a person commits an "aggravated white collar crime" when he or she engages in at least two white collar crimes that have the same or similar victims, intents, accomplices, results, or methods of commission, or that are otherwise related to each other by certain distinguishing characteristics. The statute is targeted towards crimes that are not isolated h but encompass a larger schemes involving fraudulent


Public policy/White Collar Criminal Acts/Attorney Misconduct involving racial profiling & hate group harassment FL CPI 5617503201 False reporting that she knew would be classified as a violent crime, would involve subsequent legal causation including the P.R.O.T.E.C.T. Act which is a PROSECUTORIAL TOOL INVESTIGATION AND MONITORING COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE CHILDREN AND THE DADS. THAT WAS FEBRUARY OF 2011. ALTHOUGH THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL WITHIN THE FLORIDA DCF CONFIRMED NO PARTICIPATION FROM FL DCF AGENTS (OFFICIALLY) OCCURRED AFTER THE ADJUDICATED CASE CLOSURE AS OF AUGUST 2011, HARASSMENT AND DEFAMATION CONTINUED AND ADDITIONAL FABRICATIONS BY PUBLIC OFFICERS CONTINUED TO EXONERATE HANDLEY'S FALSE MISSING CHILDREN'S/KIDNAPPING "STATEMENT" NOT CRIMINAL CHARGES SHE WROTE UP ON A GOVERNMENT OFFICE FORM AND DOCUMENT "DEPENDENCY ARRAIGNMENT " FORM, MISLEADING OTHERS THAT A CRIMINAL ARRAIGNMENT HAD ENSUED OR THAT I WAS INVOLVED IN A CRIME AGAINST CHILDREN CHARGE. FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS, INTENTIONAL ATTORNEY DECEIT FOR NONDISCLOSURE OF THE FIRST PAGE INCLUDING THESE FRAUDULENT STATEMENTS TO THE JUDGE, CONTINUING GENDER VIOLENCE/EXINTIMATE PARTNER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INVOLVING THE SAME PARTIES IN CONCURRENT FAMILY LAW CASES IN THE SAME NINTH DISTRICT COURTS ANOTHER DIVISIONS, PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING ALL PARTIES WERE ONGOING IN DIVISIONS 7 & 38/42. ON THE PUBLIC CLERK OF COURT REGISTRIES AND FL DEPR REVENUE ATTY HISTORICAL DATA, INTENTIONALLY UNCONSOLIDATED. https://goo.gl/9U5P5k


The Department of Revenue has implemented an administrative process to establish child support orders, and this process includes specific procedures designed to protect due process and ensure parents’ access to the court system. While this process has the potential to improve program outcomes, it has not yet produced the expected number of support orders. While the process is somewhat faster than establishing orders through the courts, it takes an average of over seven months to complete, and costs for administrative hearings are higher than those for judicial hearings http://www.oppaga.state.fl.us/Summary.aspx?reportNum=c http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0100-0199/0120/0120.html

PART ONE (See Page 1, PART ONE - Complainant Information.): Complaint Details Legal Cause and Tortious Injury (As a result of the fraudulent acts/omissions, and deceit by attorney and departmental employee whereas deprivation of rights involved those rights of the minors and the natural parent and mother) *FRAUD ON THE COURT TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS On the part of the attorney herein and afore mentioned in proceedings: Duty to report misconduct; code of conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA JOCELYN SHAW PARTY TO THE COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S) PART TWO (See Page 1, PART TWO - Attorney Information FLORIDA BAR MEMBER(S): SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS MACKEY GAL- PART T H R E E (See Page 1, PART T H R E E - Facts/Allegations.): The specific thing or things I am complaining about are: (attach additional sheets as necessary) "Fraud. Rule 3.3 Candor Toward The Tribunal - Comment [1] This Rule governs the conduct of a lawyer who is representing a client in the proceedings of a tribunal. See Rule 1.0(m) for the definition of "tribunal." It also applies when the lawyer is representing a client in an ancillary proceeding conducted pursuant to the tribunal’s adjudicative authority, such as a deposition. Thus, for example, paragraph (a)(3) requires a lawyer to take reasonable remedial measures if the lawyer comes to know that a client who is testifying in a deposition has offered evidence that is false. [2] This Rule sets forth the special duties of lawyers as officers of the court to avoid conduct that undermines the integrity of the adjudicative process. A lawyer acting as an advocate in an adjudicative proceeding has an obligation to present the client's case with persuasive force. Performance of that duty while maintaining confidences of the client, however, is qualified by the advocate's duty of candor to the tribunal. Consequently, although a lawyer in an adversary proceeding is not required to present an impartial exposition of the law or to vouch for the evidence submitted in a cause, the lawyer must not allow the tribunal to be misled by false statements of law or fact or evidence that the lawyer knows to be false." State employee misconduct which resulted in material injuries and legal causation: *Police stalking. Conspired with FL DCF STATE EMPLOYEE EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT, CPI NUMBER 5617503201 http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/?m=1 9457320158 (RFA CASE NUMBER 1143172973) insurance covering dental/medical Dr. Obeori & Dr.Nau (Michyl, Isis) http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/02/httpflcertificationboardorg.html?m=1 Firm associated with complaint. Interstate stalking and trespassing related to a divorcee case. Hershkowitz Russell S Attorney : Fw: ADMINISTRATIVE 92-1; In all family law cases in which a trial is anticipated, the attorney shall submit a notice that the cause is at issue.- intentional omissions; w: Mr. Williams is refusing visitation with the minor contrary to the oral & written child visitation with Atty Wayne Starr at the last hearing 8/30/2011- subsequent modification petitions have been submitted resulting in excuses by court administration, lastly stating a parental responsibility packet is needed- THERE IS NO PRESUMPTIVE FATHERHOOD STATUE APPLICABLE, UNWED AT BIRTH AND CISTODY BTW 2007 THRU 2011 WAS WITH THE MOTHERHOOD. THERE IS NO CHANCE OF RESOLUTION OF ANY INTIMATE PARTNER RELATIONSHIP & WILLIAMS AND SEVERAL OF HIS FAMILY TIES HAVE REPEATED ENGAGED IN OFFENSIVE BEHAVIOURS AND PROPERTY THEFTS MONETARY CLAIMS PRECEEDING THE ACTUAL JUDGEMENT FOR SUPPORT Fw: Court Administration employee misconduct/judicial misconduct- unconscionable delays & biased proceedings, concealed concurtent criminal proceeding involving Jarrid Williams 2/2011/ continuing domestic violence& abuse of the child support order by law enforcement personnel , domestic violence > To: info@idvaac.org > Cc: "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial" , "Judicial" , "Judicial Committee" > Date: Friday, March 17, 2017, 8:25 PM omissions: unconsolidated cases/related cases whereas information therein would substantially affect those involved such as that of concurrent criminal nonsupport proceedings against the plaintiff/paternal fathers to case- as indicative on the Lidia Gardner Clerk of Court Registries http://icpcstatepages.org/florida/criminalbackground/ 39.0138 Criminal history and other records checks; limit on placement of a child— (1) The department shall conduct a records check through the State Automated Child Welfare Information System (SACWIS) and a local and statewide criminal history records check on all persons, including parents, being considered by the department for placement of a child under this chapter, including all non-relative placement decisions, and all members of the household, 12 years of age and older, of the person being considered. For purposes of this section, a criminal history records check may include, but is not limited to, submission of fingerprints to the Department of Law Enforcement for processing and forwarding to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for state and national criminal history information, and local criminal records checks through local law enforcement agencies of all household members 18 years of age and older and other visitors to the home. An out-of-state criminal history records check must be initiated for any person 18 years of age or older who resided in another state if that state allows the release of such records. The department shall establish by rule standards for evaluating any information contained in the automated system relating to a person who must be screened for purposes of making a placement decision. 1. Chapter 560, relating to the Money Transmitters’ Code. 2. Chapter 812, relating to theft, robbery, and related crimes. 3. Chapter 815, relating to computer-related crimes. 4. Chapter 817, relating to fraudulent practices. 5. Chapter 825, relating to abuse, neglect, and exploitation of elderly persons and disabled adults. 6. Chapter 831, relating to forgery and counterfeiting. 7. Chapter 832, relating to the issuance of worthless checks and drafts. 8. Chapter 838, relating to bribery and misuse of public office. 9. Chapter 839, relating to offenses by public officers and employees. 10. Chapter 895, relating to offenses concerning racketeering and illegal debts. 11. Chapter 896, relating to offenses related to financial transactions. (b) A felony offense that is committed with intent to defraud or that involves a conspiracy to defraud. (c) A felony offense that is committed with intent to temporarily or permanently deprive a person of his or her property or that involves a conspiracy to temporarily or permanently deprive a person of his or her property. (d) A felony offense that involves or results in the commission of fraud or deceit upon a person or that involves a conspiracy to commit fraud or deceit upon a person. (4) As used in this section, “aggravated white collar crime” means engaging in at least two white collar crimes that have the same or similar intents, results, accomplices, victims, or methods of commission, or that are otherwise interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated incidents, provided that at least one of such crimes occurred after the effective date of this act. (5) Any person who commits an aggravated white collar crime as defined in this section and in so doing either: (a) Victimizes 10 or more elderly persons, as defined in s. 825.101; (b) Victimizes 20 or more persons, as defined in s. 1.01; or (c) Victimizes the State of Florida, any state agency, any of the state’s political subdivisions, or any agency of the state’s political subdivisions, and thereby obtains or attempts to obtain $50,000 or more, commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. *concurrent court proceedings FL DCF KNEW ABOUT :NINTH DISTRICT HISTORICAL DATA DIV 38/42 PRECEEDING CLAIM BY DCF CPI FELICIA HANDLEY 2005DR14270 08-24-2004 Petition for paternity entered Service denied 09-24-2004 Petition to establish paternity denied Respondent petitioned to dismiss paternity 11-08-2004 05-05-2006 Final judgment granted on paternity 10-19-2010 Final judgment for child support entered 10-22-2010 Order for income deduction 11-29-2010 Notice of change of address 12-28-2010 Petition heard to establish child support 01-14-2011 Returned mail 01-04-2011 Motion to set arrears entered 01-04-2011 Notice and hearing 02-14-2011 Hearing to set arrears 01/28/2011 Plaintiff petitions for the need for custody denied 02/04/2011 THE SPECIFIC THING OR THINGS I AM COMPLAINING ABOUT ARE: 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242). "Color of law" simply means that the person doing the act is using power given to him or her by a governmental agency (local, State, or Federal). A law enforcement officer acts "under color of law" even if he or she is exceeding his or her rightful power. THAT ON THE ONSET OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA SHAW, AS THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION 7, ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT: Juvenile Division 2000 E. Michigan St.Suite 300 Orlando, FL 32806 PROCEEDINGS (WAIVED NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD TO BE IN WRITING- WAIVED BY THE JUDGE) WERE COMMENCED WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE HISTORICAL DATA AND CONCURRENT CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS, AND HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS CONCURRENTLY PUBLISHED IN DIVISION 42 COURT, VIA CLERK OF THE ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE RISS DATABASE, THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR ACCOUNTS OF INTERAGENCY ACCESS WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. THE COMPLAINANT MAKES REFERENCE THAT THE ATTORNEY’S, WITH KNOWLEDGE, ACTED IN A DECEITFUL MANNER, NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF FRAUD RELATIVE TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS. *Duty to report misconduct; code of conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA JOCELYN SHAW PARTY TO THE COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S) 1. Chapter 560, relating to the Money Transmitters’ Code. 2. Chapter 812, relating to theft, robbery, and related crimes. 3. Chapter 815, relating to computer-related crimes. 4. Chapter 817, relating to fraudulent practices. 5. Chapter 825, relating to abuse, neglect, and exploitation of elderly persons and disabled adults. 6. Chapter 831, relating to forgery and counterfeiting. 7. Chapter 832, relating to the issuance of worthless checks and drafts. 8. Chapter 838, relating to bribery and misuse of public office. 9. Chapter 839, relating to offenses by public officers and employees. 10. Chapter 895, relating to offenses concerning racketeering and illegal debts. 11. Chapter 896, relating to offenses related to financial transactions. (b) A felony offense that is committed with intent to defraud or that involves a conspiracy to defraud. (c) A felony offense that is committed with intent to temporarily or permanently deprive a person of his or her property or that involves a conspiracy to temporarily or permanently deprive a person of his or her property. (d) A felony offense that involves or results in the commission of fraud or deceit upon a person or that involves a conspiracy to commit fraud or deceit upon a person. (4) As used in this section, “aggravated white collar crime” means engaging in at least two white collar crimes that have the same or similar intents, results, accomplices, victims, or methods of commission, or that are otherwise interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated incidents, provided that at least one of such crimes occurred after the effective date of this act. (5) Any person who commits an aggravated white collar crime as defined in this section and in so doing either: (a) Victimizes 10 or more elderly persons, as defined in s. 825.101; (b) Victimizes 20 or more persons, as defined in s. 1.01; or (c) Victimizes the State of Florida, any state agency, any of the state’s political subdivisions, or any agency of the state’s political subdivisions, and thereby obtains or attempts to obtain $50,000 or more, commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. ACAP BAR COMPLAINT DETAILS/PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS VIOLATIONS. Fw: EMPLOYEE MISCOND KUCT (hate crimes, continuing domestic violence after breaking up with Williams) CF180-4 ( per your publication, the SCOPE of guidelines, goverance of employee ethical and professional conduct states: “Fraud” means to commit an intentional violation of law or a deliberate misrepresentation or concealment so as to secure unfair or unlawful financial or personal gain.) In this case whereas fraud in the manner and form constituting DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, PUBLIC OFFICER/ATTORNEY DECEIT, COLLUSION, that he/she did KNOWINGLY WITH INTENT TO COMMIT AGGRAVATED (COMPOUNDED) SEMITIC HATE, ETHNICALLY BIASED CRIMINAL TORTS, DURESS AND EMOTIONAL ABUSE AND ALIENATION TO THE MOTHER WHO WAS ALREADY A VICTIM OF ABUSE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN THE MANNER AND FORMS OF EXINTIMATE PARTNER & FAMILY VIOLENCE, PERSONALITY TORTS AND FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS, AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RELATED TO PRECEEDING ASCERTAINMENT PURSUITS THROUGH ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL ACTIONS WHICH WERE INTENTIONALLY AND "SELECTIVELY" BIASED IN APPLICATION OF THE LAWS BOTH FEDERAL AND STATE STATUTORY APPLICATION TO CHILD CUSTODY, CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION, RECOVERY AND DISBURSEMENT, WITH AN ACT OF VIOLENCE OCCURRING FEBRUARY 4TH 2011 IN THE ABATEMENT OF CHILD DUPPORT FROM THE PRECEEDING MONTH OF COLLECTION JANUARY 2011, AFTER JUDGEMENT REIDERED ON DECEMBER 22ND, 2010 LESS THAN 60(SIXTY DAYS) THAT EMPLOYEE KNOWLEDGE THRU THE RISS INFORMATION SHARING SYSTEM PROMPTED MALICIOUS, RETALIATORY STATEMENT TO INTERFER WITH FL SDU DISBURSEMENT, REVERSING THE JANUARY PAYMENT AFTER FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDING ONSET AGAIN AFTER AN EARLY DISMISSAL ON JANUARY 28TH, 2011, BOTH OF WHICH INITIAL CLAIM WERE OMITTED DUE TO EMPLOYEE FRAUD/MISCONDUCT


White Collar Fraud participant. Program abuse/court record omissions imposed a biased prejudice in judicial proceedings, concealment of criminal nonsupport histories of the payernal dad and domestic violence against the mother, natural parent. Ethnic intimidation on false allegations of kidnapping based on program employee misconduct involing Orange County Sheriff employee misconduct, family violence personality torts. The mother has no criminal history constituting violent crimes or kidnapping/missing children criminal charges nor child abuse as alleged personality torts were used to slander and defame the mother by the paternal dad's familt ties working in law enforcement. The incident involves retaliatory harassment related to a family violence situation in another state and county in which the paternal dad alleged that the mother's daughter was a participant in parental alienation and divorcee proceedings. Harassment that was setup through family ties wirking in administrative venue. Complaint involves neglience, FL DCF employee violations of administrative policies wherein it is clearly defined what constitutes employee misconduct, fraud. All parties knew of procedure based upon "duty of care", the greater responsibilty in reporting misconduct was tge responsibilty of the other employees and attorneys who routinely handle cases and are subject to administrative policies, statutory obligations and professional responsibilities under model policies of domestic violence, juvenile courts, FL DCF employee handbook code of conduct and which representation is suppose to enforce a fair and equal protection under the law. CF180-4 Complaint against: Devereux Florida Foster Care Program Orange/Osceola/Seminole County 5749 Westgate Drive, Suite 102 ~ Orlando, FL 32835 Phone: 321.441.1567 Fax: 321.281.3887 PERSONALITY TORTS TORTS OF FRAUD TO DEFAME CHARACTER OF THE MOTHER AS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PERPETUATED BY STATE EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT, CPI NUMBER 5617503201; Fw: Fwd: ATTACHED AFFIDAVIT ON DATE OF FALSE ALLEGATION BY CPI-ETHNIC BIASNESS/RACIAL PROFILING COMPLAINT;Fw: CPI 5617503201 EMERGENCY RESPONSE FALSE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED TO LAW ENFORCEMENT REGARDING CHILD CUSTODY - THE NATURAL PARENT, MOTHER HAD CUSTODY resubmitted the ACAP CONSUMER ASSISTANCE COMPLAINT/ACAP ATTY COMPLAINT/ INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM/INTENTIONALLY OMITTED FRAUDULENT STATEMENT , fraud and white collar criminal behavior 39.0141 A Missing Children Report is Required and is found to be absent in all proceedings prior to date. & 95.11 Tort actions for fraud or assault &39.0014,39.0141 MISSING CHILDRENS REPORT REQUIRED TO: CC / BCC: FROM:  SUBJECT: Fw: resubmitted the ACAP CONSUMER ASSISTANCE COMPLAINT/ACAP ATTY COMPLAINT/ INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM/INTENTIONALLY OMITTED FRAUDULENT STATEMENT , fraud and white collar criminal behavior 39.0141 A Missing Children Report is Required and is found to be absent in all proceedings prior to date. & 95.11 Tort actions for fraud or assault &39.0014,39.0141 MISSING CHILDRENS REPORT REQUIRED Choose File Original Message On Jan 9, 2017, at 9:30 AM, Sheila Shaw wrote: From: Sheila Shaw ; To: Nine09digits ; Sheila Jocelyn ; Subject: resubmitted the ACAP CONSUMER ASSISTANCE COMPLAINT/ACAP ATTY COMPLAINT/ INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM Sent: Fri, Jan 6, 2017 9:39:00 PM ACAP ATTY COMPLAINT/ INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA JOCELYN SHAW 863 EAST WESTMORELAND ST. PHILADELPHIA, PA 19134 (PREVIOUS ADDRESS OF WHICH COMPLAINT WAS SUBMITTED:PO BOX 5147, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33657-5175) FRAUD ON THE COURT TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM ATTACHED DOCUMENT TO THE FLORIDA BAR PARTY TO THE COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S) FLORIDA BAR MEMBER(S): SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS MACKEY GAL- Ana Elena Tangel-Rodriguez Eligible to Practice Law in Florida Bar Number: 254304 Mail Address:Tangel-Rodriguez and Associates Tangel-Rodriguez & Assoc 222 Weber St Orlando, FL 32803-3831 United States Office: 407-849-1133 Email:cselsp@att.net Personal Bar URL: www.floridabar.org/mybarprofile/254304 RUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire= Retained 407-786-2889( 1110 Douglas > Ave > Altamonte Springs, FL> 32714 > (407)> 786-2889 > http://www.russellhlaw.com THE SPECIFIC THING OR THINGS I AM COMPLAINING ABOUT ARE: 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242). "Color of law" simply means that the person doing the act is using power given to him or her by a governmental agency (local, State, or Federal). A law enforcement officer acts "under color of law" even if he or she is exceeding his or her rightful power. THAT ON THE ONSET OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA SHAW, AS THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION 7, ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT: Juvenile Division 2000 E. Michigan St.Suite 300 Orlando, FL 32806 PROCEEDINGS (WAIVED NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD TO BE IN WRITING- WAIVED BY THE JUDGE) WERE COMMENCED WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE HISTORICAL DATA AND CONCURRENT CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS, AND HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS CONCURRENTLY PUBLISHED IN DIVISION 42 COURT, VIA CLERK OF THE ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE RISS DATABASE, THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR ACCOUNTS OF INTERAGENCY ACCESS WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. THE COMPLAINANT MAKES REFERENCE THAT THE ATTORNEY’S, WITH KNOWLEDGE, ACTED IN A DECEITFUL MANNER, NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF FRAUD RELATIVE TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS. Fraud Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141: makes it unlawful for state or local law enforcement agencies to allow officers to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives persons of rights protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. This law is commonly referred to as the Police Misconduct Statute. the exintimate partner and public officer employee misconduct BUSINESS TORT RELATED-ADVERSARIAL TORTS OR MATERNAL INJURIES WITH INTENT http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer_29.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/any-police-department-receiving-federal.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/family-violence-prevention-act-victim.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/false-cpi-personal-torts-tort-of-fraud.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/jarrid-williams-probation-dc-346801.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/201 Federal laws Federal law 42 U.S.C. § 5772 & 42 U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5772) defines a "missing child" as "any individual less than 18 years of age whose whereabouts are unknown to such individual"s legal custodian." RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. "ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW WERE DIVESTED AND SUBSEQUENT LEGAL CAUSATION INCLUSIVE OF : 1. A MATERIAL INJURY IN THE PROCEEDINGS BELOW THAT CANNOT BE CONCLUDED ON POST JUDGEMENT APPEAL,2. INJURY WAS CAUSED BY A DEPARTURE FORM THE ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW (WHEN THEY ARE VIOLATED) OCCURRED. IMPROPER PURPOSE USED TO ACCESS TO THE FACILITY/HARASSMENT & TORTS) CONTINUATION OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT Fw: REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION TO REOPEN CASE CASE NO 2005-DR-014270-O DIVISION 42; Fw: ATTN KEITH PARKS Action founded on negligence, fraud and white collar criminal behavior 39.0141 A Missing Children Report is Required and is found to be absent in all proceedings prior to date. & 95.11 Tort actions for fraud or assault & 39.0014,39.0141 MISSING CHILDRENS REPORT REQUIRED WHICH IN ITS ABSENCE AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS CONSTITUTES FRAUD. TORT ACTIONS OF FRAUD INCLUSIVE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND VAWA BY THE FATHERS TO CASE WHO KNEW THE ALLEGATIONS WERE FALSE THE ATTORNEY’S TO CASE DID NOT CONSOLIDATE THE TWO DIVISIONS, DIVISION 7 AND DIVISION 42, WITH KNOWLEDGE THAT A “THRESHOLD OF DEMONSTRATIVE SHOWING OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT” IN ADDITION TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CHILD WOULD BE NECESSARY UNDER PROVISIONS OUTLINED REGARDING MINORS TO JUVENILE DEPENDENCY COURT CIVIL RULES OF PRACTICE, FLORIDA STATUTES CHAPTER 39. PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO CHILDREN THE DEVASTATION FROM THE PRESIDING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL PROCESS ALONG WITH THE STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT, ATTORNEY DECEIT INCLUDED THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS: § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. Civil contempt is conduct directed against the rights of the opposing party law-imposed obligation ;"an act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere with the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the dignity of the court or respect for its authority. There are two kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct contempt openly and in the presence of the court, resists the power of the court, 102 A. 400, 406; and consequential, or constructive contempt results from matters outside the court, such as failure to comply with orders. The basic standards governing fraud on the court are reasonably straightforward. As set forth in Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998): The requisite fraud on the court occurs where “it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.” Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989) . . . . The trial court has the inherent authority, within the exercise of sound judicial discretion, to dismiss an action when a plaintiff has perpetrated a fraud on the court, or where a party refuses to comply with court orders. Kornblum v. Schneider, 609 So. 2d 138, 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). CONCURRENT PROCEEDINGS THAT POSED A BIAS IN SUBSEQUENT CHILD CUSTODY PROCEEDINGS IN THE JUVENILLE COURT 7TH DISTRICT ORANGE COUNTY COURTS Duty to report misconduct; code of conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA JOCELYN SHAW PARTY TO THE COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S) FLORIDA BAR MEMBER(S): SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS MACKEY GAL- “IN THE BEST INTERESTS OFTHE CHILD”, THE CHILD HAS THE RIGHT TO EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW/WHEREAS THE OMISSIONS RELATIVE TO THE CASE PROCEEDINGS PRESENTED A BIAS AND NONDISCLOSURE OF EXISTING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CONCURRENT WITH PROCEEDINGS WHICH AFFECTED THE CHILD, THE ECONOMIC DIVESTATION FROM FINANCIAL SUPPORT, LEGALLY DEFINED WITHIN THE MODEL POLICY OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE THAT THERE EXISTS ECONOMIC TORTS AND ABUSE REGARDING INTENTIONAL REFUSAL TO SUPPORT THE CHILD OF WHICH PATERNITY HAD BEEN ESTABLISHED 5 (5 X 365 DAYS) IN THE CASE OF CARLOS GONZALEZ AND IN THE CASE OF JARRID DESHAUN WILLIAMS THAT P0ROCEEDING WERE ON THE JUDICIAL CALENDAR IN THE NINTH DISTRICT COURT WITH A WITHDRAWAL ON FEBRAURY 14TH 2011 (COINCIDENTALLY AFTER THE ISSUANCE OF A TEMPORARY MODIFICATION OF CHILD CUSTODY, COINCIDENTALLY AFTER A CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT TO THE FLORIDA STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT BY CARLOS GONZALEZ IN JANUARY FOR THE MONTY OF JANUARY 2011, AFTER THE FINAL JUDGEMENT FOR A CURRENT SUPPORT ORDER HAD BEEN ISSUED DECEMBER 22ND, 2010) VIOLATIONS INCLUDE: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NON SUPPORT & CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY ACT VIOLATION(COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENTS- TITLE 42, FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW VIOLATIONS: REQUIREMENT OF STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED PROCEDURES TO IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] (a) In order to satisfy section 454(20)(A), each State must have in effect laws requiring the use of the following procedures, consistent with this section and with regulations of the Secretary, to increase the effectiveness of the program which the State administers under this part: Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] (a (C) Voluntary paternity acknowledgment.— (iv) Use of paternity acknowledgment affidavit. —Such procedures must require the State to develop and use an affidavit for the voluntary acknowledgment of paternity which includes the minimum requirements of the affidavit specified by the Secretary under section 452(a)(7) for the voluntary acknowledgment of paternity, and to give full faith and credit to such an affidavit signed in any other State according to its procedures. Heather Morcroft (Appellate Atty) 20 n Orange Ave Ste 700 Orlando 32801 FBN 0709859 407-325-3585 Letter regarding fraud on the court, absent administrative remedy or action in a timely manner, that such a biasedness occurred it is described as unconscionably ethnically biased, a white collar criminal act by a party who misused his/her office to aid and assist avoidance of judicial action, that the action was in violation of the minor to case’s rights, that the action was in violation of parental rights to recovery of child support and paternity establishment in the Orange County, Ninth Judicial Circuit and Court, Division 42. Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:39 PM Subject: ATTORNEY GENERAL COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST Hershkowitz Russell S Attorney Category: Bankruptcy Law [Edit] 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 (407) 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com Thank you for contacting the Attorney General's Office regarding ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT . Our staff will process it as soon as possible and, if necessary, respond appropriately. We appreciate hearing from concerned citizens such as yourself. If you wish to keep abreast of the activities of this office, you may wish to consider a subscription to our electronic newsletter Weekly Briefing. Or perhaps our Consumer Alerts. Should you wish to subscribe to either, or both, publications, please visit our subscription page. COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST RUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire= Retained 407-786-2889( 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 (407) 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com COMMENT ENTERED ON FEBRUARY 14TH, 2011- OSCE FL DEPT OF REVENUE PETITIONED THE COURT TO WITHDRAW THE MOTION TO RECOVER BACK OWED OR RETROACTIVE CHILD SUPPORT SUBSEQUENT TO JUVENILE PROCEEDINGS. THE STATED MOTIONS STATES “THAT THE REPRESENTATION IS BEING WITHDRAWN AND THE PETITION IS WITHDRAWN DUE TO “QUESTIONABLE ARREARAGES OWED”- A BIASED STATEMENT WITHOU INQUIRY AND PRESENTATION OF THE FACTS OF RECORD AVAILABLE TO ALL FL DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES- FLORIDA- LEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DIVISION, AND FL DEPT OF REV. CHILD SUPPORT DIV.- THE ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT REGISTER OF ACTIONS MAINTAINS ALL PARTIES TO THE CASE(S) PATERNITY AND CHILD SUPPORT HISTORICAL DATA, ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS- WHICH ARE ABSENT IN PROCEEDINGS CONSTITUTING UNCONSCIONABLE DELAYS – IN THE CASE OF CARLOS GONZALEZ – THE PATERNITY CASE LASTED BETWEEN 2002 – 2006- RESUMING WITH A FILING OF PATERNITY CASE NUMBER IN 2005 FOR THE JUDGEMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT WHICH WE DO NOT SEE ENTERED AS A FINANL JUDGEMENT UNTIL DECEBMER 22, 2010- A PERIOD BETWEEN 2005-2010 (FIVE YEARS – DELAYED ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS- ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT) VAWA REPORT REGARDING NOT ONLY ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT IN CHILD CUSTODY MODIFICATION Intentionally omitted criminal nonsupport, offensive behaviour, professional misconduct and ethnic biasedness, child exploitation and institutional racism Title 42 section 42 1983, 14141 attorney prosecutorial child chustody exploitation including false statements never heard throughout case trial activity, false statements to commence proceedings Case Type:Paternity Date Filed:4/24/2002 Location:Div 38 UCN:482002DR006249A001OX Judge: Patricia A Doherty BARBARA FANCHER (LIMITED) JONES, > Esquire > Retained 407-849-1133(W) > Respondent GONZALEZ, CARLOS ALBERTO > Events & Orders of > the Court DISPOSITIONS > 05/15/2012 > Order Denying (Judicial > Officer: Evans, Robert M) CC: ACAP/THE REGIONAL/DISTRICT & OIG DID NOT COMPLY WITH OR THE WAS A FAILURE TO REPORT ( https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/report-fraud/) attached ethical complaint form regarding FL CPI CERTIFICATION FOR MISCONDUCT COMPLAINTS; Fw: ORGANIZED CRIME BETWEEN ATTYS FI FL DCF, GAL, CPI WHO INTENTIONAL COMMITTED FRAUDS, EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT, PERSONALITY TORTS & FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS IN COURT HARSSMENT DURING THE MOTHER AND NATURAL PARENT'S POSTSECONDARY ENROLLMENT & THEREAFTER DURING EMPLOYABILITY RECRUITING, LIBELOUS STATEMENT WERE MADE WHICH HAVE NO VALIDITY WHILE ABSCOUNDING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT & RECOVERY OF RETROACTIVE CHILD SUPPORT)Fw: COMPLAINT RE: GAL PERFORMANCE AND CONDUCT/ DORIS MACKEY REPRESENTING FL GAL ORANGE COUNTY COMPLAINT INCLUDES THAT THE GAL REPRESENTATIVE ALSO KNEW ABOUT HISTORICAL DATA OMITTED FROM TESTIMONY Fw: (CASE DP1140 DIV 7/OMITTED: INTENTIONAL BIASEDNESS concurrent court proceedings FL DCF KNEW ABOUT :NINTH DISTRICT HISTORICAL DATA DIV 38/42 PRECEEDING CLAIM BY DCF CPI FELICIA HANDLEY 2005DR14270 08-24-2004 Petition for paternity entered Service denied 09-24-2004 Petition to establish paternity denied Respondent petitioned to dismiss paternity 11-08-2004 05-05-2006 Final judgment granted on paternity 10-19-2010 Final judgment for child support entered 10-22-2010 Order for income deduction 11-29-2010 Notice of change of address 12-28-2010 Petition heard to establish child support 01-14-2011 Returned mail 01-04-2011 Motion to set arrears entered 01-04-2011 Notice and hearing 02-14-2011 Hearing to set arrears 01/28/2011 Plaintiff petitions for the need for custody denied 02/04/2011) Fw: Attorney Misconduct/Resubmitted/Attorney Details Needed Per Request PROSECUTOR’S ROLE IN ADDRESSING SUSPECTED LAW ENFORCEMENT MISCONDUCT (a) If the prosecutor has reason to suspect misconduct or unauthorized illegal activity at any level of the prosecutor’s office or in any agency or department engaged in a criminal investigation, the prosecutor should promptly report the suspicion and the reason for it to appropriate supervisory personnel in the prosecutor’s office who have authority to address the problem, or to the appropriate inspector general’s office, or similar agency, if reporting within the prosecutor’s own office is problematic. Reporting may also be required to comply with requirements of the applicable rules of professional conduct, the Model Rules and the law of the jurisdiction. Sheila Jocelyn Shaw %{attach}

Attorney misconduct. Florida Duty to report misconduct; code of conduct The duty to report misconduct is one of the ethical o imposed on attorneys in the United States by the rules governing professional responsibility. With certain exceptions, an attorney who becomes aware that either a fellow attorney or a judge has committed an act in violation of the rules of ethical conduct must report that violation. Failure to do so subjects the attorney failing to make the report to discipline.The duty extends only to actual knowledge possessed by an attorney. An attorney who has a mere suspicion of misconduct is not required to report that suspicion, nor is the attorney required to conduct any sort of investigation to confirm or dispel that suspicion. The conduct at issue must rise to the level of misconduct under the rules of professional responsibility. Thus, an attorney who witnesses another attorney become intoxicated, engage in adultery, or gamble away a large sum of money is under no duty to report these acts because they are not prohibited by the rules of professional responsibility. Conduct that must be reported, on the other hand, includes matters such as breaching client confidentiality, misusing client funds, tampering with evidence, suborning perjury, offering bribes, and committing criminal acts of violence or dishonesty. https://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 8-2.241 Civil Laws Governing Law Enforcement Misconduct BUT ALSO LAWS THAT ARE FOR THE PREVENTION OF NEGLECT OF THE CHILD. 827.03 Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; penalties.— All historical case proceedings associated with FL Dept of Rev. Child Support Enforcement/TANF participation & Medicaid participation relative to court proceedings were filed and available including court filings and shared RISs regional information sharing system btwn OCSE & DCF departments; FL DCF Case #9457320158 (RFA CASE NUMBER 1143172973) Ineffective counsel/representation,fraud to commence proceedings FL ACAP Complaint ATTY DECEIT, goo.gl/h9wjQr SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498, COLLUSION #OIG #fraud, PUBLIC LAW 108 - 21 #misconduct atty deceit,collusion;Case No. 2002-DR-050423-I,IVD case enforcement FL/PA/IN #misconduct, cases OC9901243 PA & 02-83719047104532 PA Cause # 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL 2010-DP 1170 FL CASE#s #misconduct,professional misconduct cases:OC9901243 PA & 02-83719047104532 PA Cause # 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL 2010-DP 1170 FL IN CASE #s

Friday, 23 June 2017

Incidents at Martin Landings Apts (Village Park) , Park Hamilton Apts, The Founta Apts, Rosalea Apts. Howard Johnson. 254 Amador Cr, 712 Citrus St. , The Reserve Apts., (Orange County) flat tires, door lock break ins, ADT security desecration of the sensors, property desecration and thefts, stalking back to the grandparents at 12217 Pantar Orl Fl


White COLLAR Occupational VenueCrimethe public officers stalked me vandalizing my vehicle at multiple addresses including Code Enforcement calls to 712 Citrus St Orlando, Fl,1600 Crooms Ave Orlando,Fl,5090 Rosamond drive 191 The Fountain Apts Rosemont Florida,and then repair shop where the mechanic Omar Riley had been servicing my vehicles since January of 2008, agrey Crown Victoria1987,a grey 535IBMW,& a 1991 white Ford Explorer. All vandalized includingdoors whichRileyreceived$165 per doorto repair, under malicious prosecution or using the PATERNAL dad's 20 plus historical data Relating to his criminal rap sheet DESPITE THE FACT I ONLY HAD MET WILLIAMS IN FEBRUARY OF 2005. Additional criminal TRESPASSING OCCURRED by entering my apartment located in the aptcommunity, Park Hamilton Apts off of Silver Star Road,Orlando, Florida in February & March of 2005 after a brief onset of dating WILLIAMS during our trip to Philadelphia PA during which time the perpetrator entered the dwelling after the arrival of Compaq computer equipment I had ordered from Refurbdepot.com. Which was later vandalized and destroyed with a power surge while residing at a residence in Eatonville,Florida, 254 Armador Cricle,Eatonville Florida,(Alpha Technologies reindered it to be a blown motherboard)The perpetrator logged back into my computer the same computer I had purchased Amtrak tickets for the trip to Philadelphia and made purchases online. SAUNDERS, WARCHENE N 517 DELANEY AVE. 2B ORLANDO, FL 32801 Title VP RILEY, KESHAWN D 1826 ORCHARD PARK DR. OCOEE, FL 34761 Title S RILEY, LAUREN P 1826 ORCHARD PARK DR. OCOEE, FL 34761 Title T RILEY, OMAR K 1826 ORCHARD PARK DR. OCOEE, FL MISFILING OF THE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT (written statement was delivered in person - more than four week ago regarding multiple violent crime/hate crime and white collar criminal incidents) - . OFCT. SIKORA REPT# 15-533236/15-533305 (CSO Schmitt)w: https://goo.gl/FIYUBz romance scams/fraud crime complaint/associated complaints frauds,torts Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Sheila Shaw wrote: Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Sheila Shaw wrote: Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Sheila Shaw wrote: FraudDr 3 vehicle #thefts twitdoc.com/3Z89 RICO/Auto Parts,parts ontheft,desecration of property,mechani fraud,complaint Stage 3 Detail by Entity Name Florida Profit Corporation STAGE 3 AUTOMOTIVE, INC Filing Information Document Number P14000090694 FEI/EIN Number 47-1810028 Date Filed 11/05/2014 Effective Date 10/29/2014 State FL Status ACTIVE Principal Address 5240 W COLONIAL DR. ORLANDO, FL 32808 Mailing Address 5240 W COLONIAL DR. ORLANDO, FL 32808 Registered Agent Name & Address SAUNDERS, WARCHENE N 517 DELANEY AVE. 2B ORLANDO, FL 32801 Officer/Director Detail Name & Address Title P SAUNDERS, WARCHENE N 517 DELANEY AVE. 2B ORLANDO, FL 32801 Title VP RILEY, KESHAWN D 1826 ORCHARD PARK DR. OCOEE, FL 34761 Title S RILEY, LAUREN P 1826 ORCHARD PARK DR. OCOEE, FL 34761 Title T RILEY, OMAR K 1826 ORCHARD PARK DR. OCOEE, FL 34761 Annual Reports Report Year        Filed Date 2015        04/06/2015

Thursday, 8 June 2017

https://www.publicintegrity.org/2003/06/26/5532/misconduct-and-punishment


Punishment in most states, however, follows the same basic progression in severity: private admonition or reprimand, public reprimand, suspension from the practice of law for a set period of time, and permanent disbarment from the practice of law. Additionally, the lawyer may also be assessed the cost of the disciplinary proceedings, which can run to thousands of dollars. In some cases, a period of probation with conditions the attorney must satisfy can be imposed in lieu of a more severe punishment. The disciplinary authority or court, at any stage of the process, may decide against imposing any sanction and dismiss the complaint.

Tuesday, 23 May 2017

ACAP - FLORIDA BAR COMPLAINT Mail: Florida Certification Board Attn: Ethics Investigator – Confidential 1715 S. Gadsden Street Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Email: lfarmer@flcertificationboard.org Subject Line: Ethics Complaint – Confidential Fax: 850-222-6247 Attn: Ethics Investigator – Confidential


PART ONE (See Page 1, PART ONE - Complainant Information.): Complaint Details Legal Cause and Tortious Injury (As a result of the fraudulent acts/omissions, and deceit by attorney and departmental employee whereas deprivation of rights involved those rights of the minors and the natural parent and mother) *FRAUD ON THE COURT TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS On the part of the attorney herein and afore mentioned in proceedings: Duty to report misconduct; code of conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA JOCELYN SHAW PARTY TO THE COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S) PART TWO (See Page 1, PART TWO - Attorney Information FLORIDA BAR MEMBER(S): SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS MACKEY GAL- PART T H R E E (See Page 1, PART T H R E E - Facts/Allegations.): The specific thing or things I am complaining about are: (attach additional sheets as necessary) "Fraud. Rule 3.3 Candor Toward The Tribunal - Comment [1] This Rule governs the conduct of a lawyer who is representing a client in the proceedings of a tribunal. See Rule 1.0(m) for the definition of "tribunal." It also applies when the lawyer is representing a client in an ancillary proceeding conducted pursuant to the tribunal’s adjudicative authority, such as a deposition. Thus, for example, paragraph (a)(3) requires a lawyer to take reasonable remedial measures if the lawyer comes to know that a client who is testifying in a deposition has offered evidence that is false. [2] This Rule sets forth the special duties of lawyers as officers of the court to avoid conduct that undermines the integrity of the adjudicative process. A lawyer acting as an advocate in an adjudicative proceeding has an obligation to present the client's case with persuasive force. Performance of that duty while maintaining confidences of the client, however, is qualified by the advocate's duty of candor to the tribunal. Consequently, although a lawyer in an adversary proceeding is not required to present an impartial exposition of the law or to vouch for the evidence submitted in a cause, the lawyer must not allow the tribunal to be misled by false statements of law or fact or evidence that the lawyer knows to be false." State employee misconduct which resulted in material injuries and legal causation: *Police stalking. Conspired with FL DCF STATE EMPLOYEE EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT, CPI NUMBER 5617503201 http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/?m=1 9457320158 (RFA CASE NUMBER 1143172973) insurance covering dental/medical Dr. Obeori & Dr.Nau (Michyl, Isis) http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/02/httpflcertificationboardorg.html?m=1 Firm associated with complaint. Interstate stalking and trespassing related to a divorcee case. Hershkowitz Russell S Attorney : Fw: ADMINISTRATIVE 92-1; In all family law cases in which a trial is anticipated, the attorney shall submit a notice that the cause is at issue.- intentional omissions; w: Mr. Williams is refusing visitation with the minor contrary to the oral & written child visitation with Atty Wayne Starr at the last hearing 8/30/2011- subsequent modification petitions have been submitted resulting in excuses by court administration, lastly stating a parental responsibility packet is needed- THERE IS NO PRESUMPTIVE FATHERHOOD STATUE APPLICABLE, UNWED AT BIRTH AND CISTODY BTW 2007 THRU 2011 WAS WITH THE MOTHERHOOD. THERE IS NO CHANCE OF RESOLUTION OF ANY INTIMATE PARTNER RELATIONSHIP & WILLIAMS AND SEVERAL OF HIS FAMILY TIES HAVE REPEATED ENGAGED IN OFFENSIVE BEHAVIOURS AND PROPERTY THEFTS MONETARY CLAIMS PRECEEDING THE ACTUAL JUDGEMENT FOR SUPPORT Fw: Court Administration employee misconduct/judicial misconduct- unconscionable delays & biased proceedings, concealed concurtent criminal proceeding involving Jarrid Williams 2/2011/ continuing domestic violence& abuse of the child support order by law enforcement personnel , domestic violence > To: info@idvaac.org > Cc: "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial" , "Judicial" , "Judicial Committee" > Date: Friday, March 17, 2017, 8:25 PM omissions: unconsolidated cases/related cases whereas information therein would substantially affect those involved such as that of concurrent criminal nonsupport proceedings against the plaintiff/paternal fathers to case- as indicative on the Lidia Gardner Clerk of Court Registries http://icpcstatepages.org/florida/criminalbackground/ 39.0138 Criminal history and other records checks; limit on placement of a child— (1) The department shall conduct a records check through the State Automated Child Welfare Information System (SACWIS) and a local and statewide criminal history records check on all persons, including parents, being considered by the department for placement of a child under this chapter, including all non-relative placement decisions, and all members of the household, 12 years of age and older, of the person being considered. For purposes of this section, a criminal history records check may include, but is not limited to, submission of fingerprints to the Department of Law Enforcement for processing and forwarding to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for state and national criminal history information, and local criminal records checks through local law enforcement agencies of all household members 18 years of age and older and other visitors to the home. An out-of-state criminal history records check must be initiated for any person 18 years of age or older who resided in another state if that state allows the release of such records. The department shall establish by rule standards for evaluating any information contained in the automated system relating to a person who must be screened for purposes of making a placement decision. 1. Chapter 560, relating to the Money Transmitters’ Code. 2. Chapter 812, relating to theft, robbery, and related crimes. 3. Chapter 815, relating to computer-related crimes. 4. Chapter 817, relating to fraudulent practices. 5. Chapter 825, relating to abuse, neglect, and exploitation of elderly persons and disabled adults. 6. Chapter 831, relating to forgery and counterfeiting. 7. Chapter 832, relating to the issuance of worthless checks and drafts. 8. Chapter 838, relating to bribery and misuse of public office. 9. Chapter 839, relating to offenses by public officers and employees. 10. Chapter 895, relating to offenses concerning racketeering and illegal debts. 11. Chapter 896, relating to offenses related to financial transactions. (b) A felony offense that is committed with intent to defraud or that involves a conspiracy to defraud. (c) A felony offense that is committed with intent to temporarily or permanently deprive a person of his or her property or that involves a conspiracy to temporarily or permanently deprive a person of his or her property. (d) A felony offense that involves or results in the commission of fraud or deceit upon a person or that involves a conspiracy to commit fraud or deceit upon a person. (4) As used in this section, “aggravated white collar crime” means engaging in at least two white collar crimes that have the same or similar intents, results, accomplices, victims, or methods of commission, or that are otherwise interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated incidents, provided that at least one of such crimes occurred after the effective date of this act. (5) Any person who commits an aggravated white collar crime as defined in this section and in so doing either: (a) Victimizes 10 or more elderly persons, as defined in s. 825.101; (b) Victimizes 20 or more persons, as defined in s. 1.01; or (c) Victimizes the State of Florida, any state agency, any of the state’s political subdivisions, or any agency of the state’s political subdivisions, and thereby obtains or attempts to obtain $50,000 or more, commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. *concurrent court proceedings FL DCF KNEW ABOUT :NINTH DISTRICT HISTORICAL DATA DIV 38/42 PRECEEDING CLAIM BY DCF CPI FELICIA HANDLEY 2005DR14270 08-24-2004 Petition for paternity entered Service denied 09-24-2004 Petition to establish paternity denied Respondent petitioned to dismiss paternity 11-08-2004 05-05-2006 Final judgment granted on paternity 10-19-2010 Final judgment for child support entered 10-22-2010 Order for income deduction 11-29-2010 Notice of change of address 12-28-2010 Petition heard to establish child support 01-14-2011 Returned mail 01-04-2011 Motion to set arrears entered 01-04-2011 Notice and hearing 02-14-2011 Hearing to set arrears 01/28/2011 Plaintiff petitions for the need for custody denied 02/04/2011 THE SPECIFIC THING OR THINGS I AM COMPLAINING ABOUT ARE: 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242). "Color of law" simply means that the person doing the act is using power given to him or her by a governmental agency (local, State, or Federal). A law enforcement officer acts "under color of law" even if he or she is exceeding his or her rightful power. THAT ON THE ONSET OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA SHAW, AS THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION 7, ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT: Juvenile Division 2000 E. Michigan St.Suite 300 Orlando, FL 32806 PROCEEDINGS (WAIVED NOTICE OF OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD TO BE IN WRITING- WAIVED BY THE JUDGE) WERE COMMENCED WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE HISTORICAL DATA AND CONCURRENT CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS, AND HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS CONCURRENTLY PUBLISHED IN DIVISION 42 COURT, VIA CLERK OF THE ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE RISS DATABASE, THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR ACCOUNTS OF INTERAGENCY ACCESS WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. THE COMPLAINANT MAKES REFERENCE THAT THE ATTORNEY’S, WITH KNOWLEDGE, ACTED IN A DECEITFUL MANNER, NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF FRAUD RELATIVE TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS. *Duty to report misconduct; code of conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA JOCELYN SHAW PARTY TO THE COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S) 1. Chapter 560, relating to the Money Transmitters’ Code. 2. Chapter 812, relating to theft, robbery, and related crimes. 3. Chapter 815, relating to computer-related crimes. 4. Chapter 817, relating to fraudulent practices. 5. Chapter 825, relating to abuse, neglect, and exploitation of elderly persons and disabled adults. 6. Chapter 831, relating to forgery and counterfeiting. 7. Chapter 832, relating to the issuance of worthless checks and drafts. 8. Chapter 838, relating to bribery and misuse of public office. 9. Chapter 839, relating to offenses by public officers and employees. 10. Chapter 895, relating to offenses concerning racketeering and illegal debts. 11. Chapter 896, relating to offenses related to financial transactions. (b) A felony offense that is committed with intent to defraud or that involves a conspiracy to defraud. (c) A felony offense that is committed with intent to temporarily or permanently deprive a person of his or her property or that involves a conspiracy to temporarily or permanently deprive a person of his or her property. (d) A felony offense that involves or results in the commission of fraud or deceit upon a person or that involves a conspiracy to commit fraud or deceit upon a person. (4) As used in this section, “aggravated white collar crime” means engaging in at least two white collar crimes that have the same or similar intents, results, accomplices, victims, or methods of commission, or that are otherwise interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated incidents, provided that at least one of such crimes occurred after the effective date of this act. (5) Any person who commits an aggravated white collar crime as defined in this section and in so doing either: (a) Victimizes 10 or more elderly persons, as defined in s. 825.101; (b) Victimizes 20 or more persons, as defined in s. 1.01; or (c) Victimizes the State of Florida, any state agency, any of the state’s political subdivisions, or any agency of the state’s political subdivisions, and thereby obtains or attempts to obtain $50,000 or more, commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. ACAP BAR COMPLAINT DETAILS/PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS VIOLATIONS. Fw: EMPLOYEE MISCOND KUCT (hate crimes, continuing domestic violence after breaking up with Williams) CF180-4 ( per your publication, the SCOPE of guidelines, goverance of employee ethical and professional conduct states: “Fraud” means to commit an intentional violation of law or a deliberate misrepresentation or concealment so as to secure unfair or unlawful financial or personal gain.) In this case whereas fraud in the manner and form constituting DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, PUBLIC OFFICER/ATTORNEY DECEIT, COLLUSION, that he/she did KNOWINGLY WITH INTENT TO COMMIT AGGRAVATED (COMPOUNDED) SEMITIC HATE, ETHNICALLY BIASED CRIMINAL TORTS, DURESS AND EMOTIONAL ABUSE AND ALIENATION TO THE MOTHER WHO WAS ALREADY A VICTIM OF ABUSE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN THE MANNER AND FORMS OF EXINTIMATE PARTNER & FAMILY VIOLENCE, PERSONALITY TORTS AND FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS, AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RELATED TO PRECEEDING ASCERTAINMENT PURSUITS THROUGH ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL ACTIONS WHICH WERE INTENTIONALLY AND "SELECTIVELY" BIASED IN APPLICATION OF THE LAWS BOTH FEDERAL AND STATE STATUTORY APPLICATION TO CHILD CUSTODY, CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION, RECOVERY AND DISBURSEMENT, WITH AN ACT OF VIOLENCE OCCURRING FEBRUARY 4TH 2011 IN THE ABATEMENT OF CHILD DUPPORT FROM THE PRECEEDING MONTH OF COLLECTION JANUARY 2011, AFTER JUDGEMENT REIDERED ON DECEMBER 22ND, 2010 LESS THAN 60(SIXTY DAYS) THAT EMPLOYEE KNOWLEDGE THRU THE RISS INFORMATION SHARING SYSTEM PROMPTED MALICIOUS, RETALIATORY STATEMENT TO INTERFER WITH FL SDU DISBURSEMENT, REVERSING THE JANUARY PAYMENT AFTER FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDING ONSET AGAIN AFTER AN EARLY DISMISSAL ON JANUARY 28TH, 2011, BOTH OF WHICH INITIAL CLAIM WERE OMITTED DUE TO EMPLOYEE FRAUD/MISCONDUCT

Monday, 22 May 2017

http://icpcstatepages.org/florida/criminalbackground/ 39.0138 Criminal history and other records checks; limit on placement of a child— (1) The department shall conduct a records check through the State Automated Child Welfare Information System (SACWIS) and a local and statewide criminal history records check on all persons, including parents, being considered by the department for placement of a child under this chapter, including all non-relative placement decisions, and all members of the household, 12 years of age and older, of the person being considered. For purposes of this section, a criminal history records check may include, but is not limited to, submission of fingerprints to the Department of Law Enforcement for processing and forwarding to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for state and national criminal history information, and local criminal records checks through local law enforcement agencies of all household members 18 years of age and older and other visitors to the home. An out-of-state criminal history records check must be initiated for any person 18 years of age or older who resided in another state if that state allows the release of such records. The department shall establish by rule standards for evaluating any information contained in the automated system relating to a person who must be screened for purposes of making a placement decision. 1. Chapter 560, relating to the Money Transmitters’ Code. 2. Chapter 812, relating to theft, robbery, and related crimes. 3. Chapter 815, relating to computer-related crimes. 4. Chapter 817, relating to fraudulent practices. 5. Chapter 825, relating to abuse, neglect, and exploitation of elderly persons and disabled adults. 6. Chapter 831, relating to forgery and counterfeiting. 7. Chapter 832, relating to the issuance of worthless checks and drafts. 8. Chapter 838, relating to bribery and misuse of public office. 9. Chapter 839, relating to offenses by public officers and employees. 10. Chapter 895, relating to offenses concerning racketeering and illegal debts. 11. Chapter 896, relating to offenses related to financial transactions. (b) A felony offense that is committed with intent to defraud or that involves a conspiracy to defraud. (c) A felony offense that is committed with intent to temporarily or permanently deprive a person of his or her property or that involves a conspiracy to temporarily or permanently deprive a person of his or her property. (d) A felony offense that involves or results in the commission of fraud or deceit upon a person or that involves a conspiracy to commit fraud or deceit upon a person. (4) As used in this section, “aggravated white collar crime” means engaging in at least two white collar crimes that have the same or similar intents, results, accomplices, victims, or methods of commission, or that are otherwise interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated incidents, provided that at least one of such crimes occurred after the effective date of this act. (5) Any person who commits an aggravated white collar crime as defined in this section and in so doing either: (a) Victimizes 10 or more elderly persons, as defined in s. 825.101; (b) Victimizes 20 or more persons, as defined in s. 1.01; or (c) Victimizes the State of Florida, any state agency, any of the state’s political subdivisions, or any agency of the state’s political subdivisions, and thereby obtains or attempts to obtain $50,000 or more, commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.


a plaintiff need only demonstrate that an attorney has breached his implied contractual duty to provide legal services in a manner consistent with the profession at large. Gorski v. Smith, 812 A. 2d 683 (Pa. Super 2002). The Court in Gorski also cited Fiorentino v. Rapoport, 693 A.2d 208 (Pa. Super. 1997), app. den’d, 701 A.2d 577 (Pa. 1997), as supporting this interpretation of Bailey.


Sunday, 14 May 2017

http://www.assembly.nl.ca/legislation/sr/statutes/f03-1.htm


SNL2005 CHAPTER F-3.1 FAMILY VIOLENCE PROTECTION ACT Amended: 2006 c40 s7; 2009 c16 s9; 2012 c9; 2013 cA-3.1 s86 CHAPTER F-3.1 AN ACT RESPECTING PROTECTION AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE (Assented to December 13, 2005 ) Analysis 1. Short title 2. Definitions 2.1 Authority of judge 3. Family violence defined 4. Application process 5. Granting of emergency protection order without notice to another person 6. Contents of emergency protection order 7. Duration of emergency protection order 8. Respondent to have notice 9. Right to review 10. Application to set aside 11. Powers of judge on hearing to set aside 12. Application to vary or terminate 12.1 Appeal 13. Effect of emergency protection order 14. Effect on property and leasehold interest 15. Order directs police officer 16. Confidentiality 17. Protection from personal liability 18. Penalties 19. Duty to report continued 20. Regulations 21. Commencement Be it enacted by the Lieutenant-Governor and House of Assembly in Legislative Session convened, as follows: Short title 1. This Act may be cited as the Family Violence Protection Act . 2005 cF-3.1 s1 Back to Top Definitions 2. In this Act (a) "applicant" means a person referred to in subsection 4(1) (i) who applies for an emergency protection order, (ii) on whose behalf an application is made for an emergency protection order, or (iii) who is granted an emergency protection order; (b) "child" means a child born within or outside marriage who ordinarily or periodically resides with the applicant and is under the age of 19 years and unmarried and includes (i) a child adopted under the Adoption Act, 2013 , (ii) a child whom the applicant has demonstrated a settled intention to treat as a child of his or her family, and (iii) a child in the actual care and custody of the applicant; (c) "clerk" includes a clerk acting under the Criminal Code and the Youth Criminal Justice Act (Canada ) and a person who performs the duties of a clerk of the court; (d) "court", except as otherwise provided, means the Provincial Court of Newfoundland and Labrador ; (e) "emergency protection order" means an order granted under section 5; (f) "family violence" means an act or omission described in subsection 3(1); (g) "judge", except as otherwise provided, means a Provincial Court judge appointed under the Provincial Court Act, 1991 and includes the chief judge; (h) "minister" means the minister appointed under the Executive Council Act to administer this Act; (i) "police officer" means (i) a member of the Royal Newfoundland Constabulary, and (ii) a member of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Force stationed in the province; (j) "property" means an interest, present or future, vested or contingent, in real or personal property, including companion animals, and includes property that (i) a person owns, or (ii) a person does not own but (A) uses or enjoys, (B) is available for the person's use or enjoyment, (C) is in the person's care or custody, or (D) is at the person's residence; (k) "residence" means a place where the applicant normally resides and includes a residence that the applicant has vacated due to family violence; (l) "respondent" means a person against whom an emergency protection order is sought or granted under this Act; (m) "rules of court" means the rules made under section 29.1 of the Provincial Court Act, 1991 ; and (n) "weapon" has the meaning assigned to it under section 2 of the Criminal Code and includes an explosive substance. 2005 cF-3.1 s2; 2012 c9 s1; 2013 cA-3.1 s86 Back to Top Authority of judge 2.1 Notwithstanding sections 43.7 and 43.9 of the Judicature Act , an application under this Act shall be made to and heard and determined by a judge in accordance with this Act and the regulations. 2009 c16 s9 Back to Top Family violence defined 3. (1) For the purpose of this Act, "family violence" means one or more of the following acts or omissions committed against an applicant or a child by a respondent: (a) an assault that consists of the intentional application of force that causes the applicant to fear for his or her safety but does not include an act committed in self-defence; (b) an intentional, reckless or threatened act or omission that causes bodily harm or damage to property; (c) an intentional, reckless or threatened act or omission that causes a reasonable fear of bodily harm or damage to property; (d) forcible physical confinement without lawful authority; (e) sexual assault, sexual exploitation or sexual molestation, or the threat of sexual assault, sexual exploitation or sexual molestation; (f) conduct that causes the applicant to reasonably fear for his or her safety, including following, contacting, communicating with, observing or recording a person; and (g) the deprivation of food, clothing, medical attention, shelter, transportation or other necessaries of life. (2) Family violence may be found to have occurred for the purpose of this Act whether or not, in respect of an act or omission described in subsection (1), a charge has been laid or dismissed or withdrawn or a conviction has been or could be obtained. (3) For the purpose of this Act, a respondent who encourages or solicits another person to do an act which, if done by the respondent, would constitute family violence against the applicant, is considered to have done that act personally.

Thursday, 27 April 2017


Attorney misconduct. Florida Duty to report misconduct; code of conduct The duty to report misconduct is one of the ethical o imposed on attorneys in the United States by the rules governing professional responsibility. With certain exceptions, an attorney who becomes aware that either a fellow attorney or a judge has committed an act in violation of the rules of ethical conduct must report that violation. Failure to do so subjects the attorney failing to make the report to discipline.The duty extends only to actual knowledge possessed by an attorney. An attorney who has a mere suspicion of misconduct is not required to report that suspicion, nor is the attorney required to conduct any sort of investigation to confirm or dispel that suspicion. The conduct at issue must rise to the level of misconduct under the rules of professional responsibility. Thus, an attorney who witnesses another attorney become intoxicated, engage in adultery, or gamble away a large sum of money is under no duty to report these acts because they are not prohibited by the rules of professional responsibility. Conduct that must be reported, on the other hand, includes matters such as breaching client confidentiality, misusing client funds, tampering with evidence, suborning perjury, offering bribes, and committing criminal acts of violence or dishonesty. https://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 8-2.241 Civil Laws Governing Law Enforcement Misconduct BUT ALSO LAWS THAT ARE FOR THE PREVENTION OF NEGLECT OF THE CHILD. 827.03 Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; penalties.— All historical case proceedings associated with FL Dept of Rev. Child Support Enforcement/TANF participation & Medicaid participation relative to court proceedings were filed and available including court filings and shared RISs regional information sharing system btwn OCSE & DCF departments; FL DCF Case #9457320158 (RFA CASE NUMBER 1143172973) Ineffective counsel/representation,fraud to commence proceedings FL ACAP Complaint ATTY DECEIT, goo.gl/h9wjQr SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498, COLLUSION #OIG #fraud, PUBLIC LAW 108 - 21 #misconduct atty deceit,collusion;Case No. 2002-DR-050423-I,IVD case enforcement FL/PA/IN #misconduct, cases OC9901243 PA & 02-83719047104532 PA Cause # 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL 2010-DP 1170 FL CASE#s #misconduct,professional misconduct cases:OC9901243 PA & 02-83719047104532 PA Cause # 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL 2010-DP 1170 FL IN CASE #s

Fraud. Rule 3.3 Candor Toward The Tribunal - Comment [1] This Rule governs the conduct of a lawyer who is representing a client in the proceedings of a tribunal. See Rule 1.0(m) for the definition of "tribunal." It also applies when the lawyer is representing a client in an ancillary proceeding conducted pursuant to the tribunal’s adjudicative authority, such as a deposition. Thus, for example, paragraph (a)(3) requires a lawyer to take reasonable remedial measures if the lawyer comes to know that a client who is testifying in a deposition has offered evidence that is false. [2] This Rule sets forth the special duties of lawyers as officers of the court to avoid conduct that undermines the integrity of the adjudicative process. A lawyer acting as an advocate in an adjudicative proceeding has an obligation to present the client's case with persuasive force. Performance of that duty while maintaining confidences of the client, however, is qualified by the advocate's duty of candor to the tribunal. Consequently, although a lawyer in an adversary proceeding is not required to present an impartial exposition of the law or to vouch for the evidence submitted in a cause, the lawyer must not allow the tribunal to be misled by false statements of law or fact or evidence that the lawyer knows to be false.


http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/03/state-emoloyee-misconduct-fw.html?m=1

Thursday, 30 March 2017


Aggravated White Collar Hate Crimes including a mockery of statutory clause “highly visible” in child support cases preceding fabricated subsequent malicious associated claims accompanying violations of due process and improper performance. Both adverse parties were concurrently being summoned to answer and respond to criminal charges in family court of which all state employees and attorneys involved had access to state and federal court management records as well as universally published registries of court actions publishing court ordered proceedings, judgments and histories of absent financial support also described as domestic violence, continuing domestic/dating g violence by which personality torts and fraud was invoked to evade child support obligations along with continued false statements and public officer misconduct. 18 U.S.C. § 228- Failure to pay legal child support obligations http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/03/7750844white-collar-crime-victim.html?m=1 http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/02/httpswwwfloridabarorgdivcomjnjnjournal0.html?m=1 ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT & CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY ACT... FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW VIOLATIONS http://www.hinshawlaw.com/the-lawyers-lawyer-newsletter---recent-developments-in-risk-management-03-09-2012/ Duty to report misconduct; code of conduct https:// www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 TORT LAW: A tort is a civil wrong resulting from a violation of a legal right not created by contract for which monetary redress is provided.

Monday, 27 March 2017

Ms. Handley, the FL CPI who made a false report using RISS & government office, equipment not only made a false report but also on February 4, 2011 contacted the FL State CHILD SUPPORT DISBURSEMENT UNIT AND ABATED CHILD SUPPORT PAYMMENTS MADE FOR THE MONTH OF JANUARY AFTER A NEWLY ORDERED FINAL JUDGEMENT HAD BEEN MADE DECEMBER 2010, RETURNED THE SUPPORT PAYMENT THAT HAD BEEN IN PROCESS SINCE JANUARY 2010, A PAYMENT PROCESSING TIME THAT WAS DUE DISPERSMENT WITHIN SEVEN DAYS WHICH WOULD BE AROUND THE TIME HANDLEY MADE THE FALSE ALLEGATION, FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS ON FEBRUARY 3RD, 2011, PRIOR TO ANY JUDGMENT OR HEARINGS AND PRECIDING JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE REVIEW OR ABSENT CONSOLIDATION REQUESTS TO HAVE BEEN MADE BY ATTORNEYS NOTIFYING THE JUDGE THAT THE TWO DADS WERE IN FAMILY COURT PROCEEDINGS REGARDING CDIMINAL NONSUPPORT, CURRENT SUPPORT MODIFICATION AND RECOVERY OF RETROACTIVE ARREARAGES TO BE SET AND AWAITING JUDGEMENT AS OF FEBRUARY OF 2011. As used in this section, “white collar crime” means: (a) The commission of, or a conspiracy to commit, any felony offense specified in: 1. Chapter 560, relating to the Money Transmitters’ Code. 775.0844 White Collar Crime Victim Protection Act


Any person who commits an aggravated white collar crime as defined in this section and in so doing either: (a) Victimizes 10 or more elderly persons, as defined in s. 825.101; (b) Victimizes 20 or more persons, as defined in s. 1.01; or (c) Victimizes the State of Florida, any state agency, any of the state’s political subdivisions, or any agency of the state’s political subdivisions, and thereby obtains or attempts to obtain $50,000 or more, commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

Friday, 17 March 2017

(Any person who commits an aggravated white collar crime as defined in this section and in so doing either: (a) Victimizes 10 or more elderly persons, as defined in s. 825.101; (b) Victimizes 20 or more persons, as defined in s. 1.01; or (c) Victimizes the State of Florida, any state agency, any of the state’s political subdivisions, or any agency of the state’s political subdivisions, and thereby obtains or attempts to obtain $50,000 or more, commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.) State emoloyee misconduct: Fw: ADMINISTRATIVE 92-1; In all family law cases in which a trial is anticipated, the attorney shall submit a notice that the cause is at issue.- intentional omissions; w: Mr. Williams is refusing visitation with the minor contrary to the oral & written child visitation with Atty Wayne Starr at the last hearing 8/30/2011- subsequent modification petitions have been submitted resulting in excuses by court administration, lastly stating a parental responsibility packet is needed- THERE IS NO PRESUMPTIVE FATHERHOOD STATUE APPLICABLE, UNWED AT BIRTH AND CISTODY BTW 2007 THRU 2011 WAS WITH THE MOTHERHOOD. THERE IS NO CHANCE OF RESOLUTION OF ANY INTIMATE PARTNER RELATIONSHIP & WILLIAMS AND SEVERAL OF HIS FAMILY TIES HAVE REPEATED ENGAGED IN OFFENSIVE BEHAVIOURS AND PROPERTY THEFTS MONETARY CLAIMS PRECEEDING THE ACTUAL JUDGEMENT FOR SUPPORT Fw: Court Administration employee misconduct/judicial misconduct- unconscionable delays & biased proceedings, concealed concurtent criminal proceeding involving Jarrid Williams 2/2011/ continuing domestic violence& abuse of the child support order by law enforcement personnel , domestic violence > To: info@idvaac.org > Cc: "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial misconduct" , "judicial" , "Judicial" , "Judicial Committee" > Date: Friday, March 17, 2017, 8:25 PM > > Sheila Jocelyn Shaw > http://professsorshaw.blogspot.com/ > > > --- On Fri, 3/17/17, Sheila Shaw > wrote: > > > From: Sheila Shaw > > Subject: Fw: ADMINIDTRATIVE 92-1;     In all family > law cases in which a trial is anticipated, the attorney > shall submit a notice that the cause is at issue.- > intentional omissions;     w: Mr. Williams is refusing > visitation with the minor contrary to the oral & > written child visitation with Atty Wayne Starr at the last > hearing 8/30/2011- subsequent modification petitions have > been submitted resulting in excuses by court administration, > lastly stating a parental responsibility packet is needed- > THERE IS NO PRESUMPTIVE FATHERHOOD STATUE APPLICABLE, UNWED > AT BIRTH AND CISTODY BTW 2007 THRU 2011 WAS WITH THE > MOTHERHOOD. THERE IS NO CHANCE OF RESOLUTION OF ANY INTIMATE > PARTNER RELATIONSHIP & WILLIAMS AND SEVERAL OF HIS > FAMILY TIES HAVE REPEATED ENGAGED IN OFFENSIVE BEHAVIOURS > AND PROPERTY THEFTS MONETARY CLAIMS PRECEEDING THE ACTUAL > JUDGEMENT FOR SUPPORT Fw: Court Administration employee > misconduct/judicial misconduct- unconscionable delays > & biased proceedings, concealed concurtent criminal > proceeding involving Jarrid Williams 2/2011/ continuing > domestic violence& abuse of the child support order > by law enforcement personnel , domestic violence > > To: "abuse" , > "child" , > "child" , > "child" , > "child" , > "child" , > "child" , > "child" , > "child" , > "child" , > "Childrens Inspector" > > Date: Friday, March 17, 2017, 6:44 PM > > > > Sheila Jocelyn Shaw > > http://professsorshaw.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > --- On Fri, 3/17/17, Sheila Shaw > > wrote: > > > > > From: Sheila Shaw > > > Subject: ADMINIDTRATIVE 92-1;     In all > family law > > cases in which a trial is anticipated, the attorney > shall > > submit a notice that the cause is at issue.- > intentional > > omissions;     w: Mr. Williams is refusing > visitation > > with the minor contrary to the oral & written > child > > visitation with Atty Wayne Starr at the last hearing > > 8/30/2011- subsequent modification petitions have been > > submitted resulting in excuses by court > administration, > > lastly stating a parental responsibility packet is > needed- > > THERE IS NO PRESUMPTIVE FATHERHOOD STATUE APPLICABLE, > UNWED > > AT BIRTH AND CISTODY BTW 2007 THRU 2011 WAS WITH THE > > MOTHERHOOD. THERE IS NO CHANCE OF RESOLUTION OF ANY > INTIMATE > > PARTNER RELATIONSHIP & WILLIAMS AND SEVERAL OF HIS > > FAMILY TIES HAVE REPEATED ENGAGED IN OFFENSIVE > BEHAVIOURS > > AND PROPERTY THEFTS MONETARY CLAIMS PRECEEDING THE > ACTUAL > > JUDGEMENT FOR SUPPORT Fw: Court Administration > employee > > misconduct/judicial misconduct- unconscionable delays > > & biased proceedings, concealed concurtent > criminal > > proceeding involving Jarrid Williams 2/2011/ > continuing > > domestic violence& abuse of the child support > order > > by law enforcement personnel , domestic violence > > > To: "domestic.violence@myflfamilies.com" > > > > > Date: Friday, March 17, 2017, 6:42 PM > > > --- On Fri, 3/17/17, Sheila Shaw > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > From: Sheila Shaw > > > > Subject: Fw: Mr. Williams is refusing > visitation > > with > > > the minor contrary to the oral & written > child > > > visitation with Atty Wayne Starr at the last > hearing > > > 8/30/2011- subsequent modification petitions have > been > > > submitted resulting in excuses by court > > administration, > > > lastly stating a parental responsibility packet > is > > needed- > > > THERE IS NO PRESUMPTIVE FATHERHOOD STATUE > APPLICABLE, > > UNWED > > > AT BIRTH AND CISTODY BTW 2007 THRU 2011 WAS WITH > THE > > > MOTHERHOOD. THERE IS NO CHANCE OF RESOLUTION OF > ANY > > INTIMATE > > > PARTNER RELATIONSHIP & WILLIAMS AND SEVERAL OF > HIS > > > FAMILY TIES HAVE REPEATED ENGAGED IN OFFENSIVE > > BEHAVIOURS > > > AND PROPERTY THEFTS MONETARY CLAIMS PRECEEDING > THE > > ACTUAL > > > JUDGEMENT FOR SUPPORT Fw: Court Administration > > employee > > > misconduct/judicial misconduct- unconscionable > delays > > & > > > biased proceedings, concealed concurtent criminal > > proceeding > > > involving Jarrid Williams 2/2011/ continuing > domestic > > > violence& abuse of the child support order by > law > > > enforcement personnel Any person who commits an aggravated white collar crime as defined in this section and in so doing either: (a) Victimizes 10 or more elderly persons, as defined in s. 825.101; (b) Victimizes 20 or more persons, as defined in s. 1.01; or (c) Victimizes the State of Florida, any state agency, any of the state’s political subdivisions, or any agency of the state’s political subdivisions, and thereby obtains or attempts to obtain $50,000 or more, commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

Friday, 3 March 2017

Abuse of RISS system, employee misconduct fraud, ethnically biased incidents, racial profiling. RELATED CASESAND CONFIDENTIALRECORDS The parties shall complywith the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, requiring a party to file a notice ofrelated cases, if any. A case is considered related if it involves the same parties, children, or issues and is pending when thefamily law case is filed; or if it affects the court’s jurisdiction to proceed; or ifan order in the related case may conflict with an order on the same issues in the newcase; or ifan order in the new case may conflict with an order in the earlier case. The Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Rules of Procedure Form 12.900(h), Notice ofRelated Cases, isattached asAppendix Four. The parties shall complywith the requirements involving social security numbers set forth in Chapter 61, Chapter 741-742 Florida Statutes (2007),as wellas the Florida FamilyLawRules ofProcedure. The parties shallcomplywith the requirements set forth in the Florida Rules of JudicialAdministration, as wellas the Florida Family Law Rules and Florida Statutes, pertaining to any request to makerecordsconfidential. SECTION 14: PARENTINGPLANS WITHTIME-SHARINGSCHEDULES: Aformto assist the parties in developing a parenting plan,approved by the Florida Supreme Court onMarch 26, 2009, is attached asAppendix Five(Form12.995(b)). As additionalassistance to parties, Model Parenting Plans with time-sharing schedules are provided inAppendices Six, Seven, and Eight. A Supervised/Safety-Focused Parenting Plan is attached as AppendixNine, Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms, Form12.995(b).


Florida DCF CPI EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT DELIBERATE FRAUDS, DECEIT AND CONSPIRACY. DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS TO EQUAL JUSTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CHILDREN'S RIGHT TO FAIR PROCEEDINGS, VAWA, OMISSIONS AND CONCEALED INFORMATION BIASED JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS INFORMATION THAT WAS IN PATERNITY AND CHILD SUPPORT HISTORICAL CASE DATA SINCE 2002/ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS & OCSE DEPT OF REVENUE CASE REGISTRIES FOR IN STATE AND IVD CASE RECORDS MAINTAINED. THE FALSE REPORTING IF MISSING CHILDREN WAS A VIOLATION OF STATE STATUTE, FALSE REPORTING ASIDE FROM DEPARTMENTAL EMPLOYEE FRAUD, MISUSE OF GOVERNMENT EQUIPMENT AND DATABASE TI COMMIT AN ETHNICALLY MOTIVATED HATE CRIME COINCIDING WITH POST ACADEMIC STUDIES AND BIRACIAL CHILD CUSTODY ISSUES. (RISSGang Website and Database is a comprehensive gang resource that offers a criminal intelligence database and a website, which includes informational resources. The database provides agencies with access to gang information, including suspects, organizations, weapons, photographs, and graffiti. Available to all authorized law enforcement, RISSGang contains hundreds of thousands of database records and provides for a federated search, including CalGang. • Secure Email provides electronic communications for members to exchange sensitive information. More than 30 million email transactions occur each year. If your agency doesn’t have secure email, use ours. • RISS ATIX (Automated Trusted Information Exchange) Website provides law enforcement, public safety, and critical infrastructure personnel with access to homeland security, disaster, and terrorist threat information. • RISSNET provides secure access to critical national information resources: Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) Electronic Learning Portal, Fusion Center Assistance and Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting (SAR) Initiative (NSI), Secure Hosted Websites (SharePoint) For Agency Collaboration, GFIPM and LEO Enterprise Portal, INTERPOL, National Criminal Intelligence Resource Center (NCIRC), National Identity Crimes Law Enforcement (NICLE) Network, National Motor Vehicle Title Information System (NMVTIS), National Railroad Trespasser Database, National Virtual Pointer System (NVPS), National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C), U.S. Secret Service’s Targeted Violence Information Sharing System (TAVISS) RUSSELL SCOTT > HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire= > Retained > 407-786-2889( > 1110 Douglas > Ave > Altamonte Springs, FL > 32714 > (407) > 786-2889 > http://www.russellhlaw.com concurrent court proceedings FL DCF KNEW ABOUT :NINTH DISTRICT HISTORICAL DATA DIV 38/42 PRECEEDING CLAIM BY DCF CPI FELICIA HANDLEY 2005DR14270 08-24-2004 Petition for paternity entered Service denied 09-24-2004 Petition to establish paternity denied Respondent petitioned to dismiss paternity 11-08-2004 05-05-2006 Final judgment granted on paternity 10-19-2010 Final judgment for child support entered 10-22-2010 Order for income deduction 11-29-2010 Notice of change of address 12-28-2010 Petition heard to establish child support 01-14-2011 Returned mail 01-04-2011 Motion to set arrears entered 01-04-2011 Notice and hearing 02-14-2011 Hearing to set arrears 01/28/2011 Plaintiff petitions for the need for custody denied 02/04/2011 ... Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:53 AM, Sheila Shaw wrote: Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:51 AM, Sheila Shaw wrote: concurrent court proceedings FL DCF KNEW ABOUT :NINTH DISTRICT HISTORICAL DATA DIV 38/42 PRECEEDING CLAIM BY DCF CPI FELICIA HANDLEY 2005DR14270 08-24-2004 Petition for paternity entered Service denied 09-24-2004 Petition to establish paternity denied Respondent petitioned to dismiss paternity 11-08-2004 05-05-2006 Final judgment granted on paternity 10-19-2010 Final judgment for child support entered 10-22-2010 Order for income deduction 11-29-2010 Notice of change of address 12-28-2010 Petition heard to establish child support 01-14-2011 Returned mail 01-04-2011 Motion to set arrears entered 01-04-2011 Notice and hearing 02-14-2011 Hearing to set arrears 01/28/2011 Plaintiff petitions for the need for custody denied 02/04/2011 INFORMS THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (ACAP) WITHIN THE TIME AND STATUTORY LIMITATIONS OF 6 SIX YEARS, THAT THE FOREGOING COMPLAINT IS IN REGARDS TO THE VIOLATIONS SET FORTH: IS IN REGARDS TO THE VIOLATIONS SET FORTH: http://www.floridabar.org/divexe/rrtfb.nsf/FV/0B6C8E5CDCA464D685257172004B0FBD 4-8 MAINTAINING THE INTEGRITY OF THE PROFESSION RULE 4-8.4 MISCONDUCT THAT ON THE ONSET OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA SHAW, AS THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION 7, ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT: Juvenile Division 2000 E. Michigan St. Suite 300 Orlando, FL 32806 PROCEEDING WERE COMMENCED WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE, THAT FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS TOOK PLACE, AND THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF PROCEEDINGS ATTORNEY DECEIT OCCURRED INCLUDING INTENTIONAL CONCEALMENT OF THE FACTS REGARDING CONCURRENT CASE ACTIVITY FOR CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT AND RECOVERY OF CHILD SUPPORT ARREARAGES WERE ONGOING IN THE MONTH DISTRICT FAMILY COURT, DIVISIONS 42 & 38, CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT AGAINST HARRIS DESHAUN WILLIAMS AND CARLOS ALBERTO GONZALEZ AND HAD BEEN ONGOING FOR SEVERAL YEARS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF ENTRY INTO JUVENILE DEPENDENCY PROCEEDINGS AS OF FEBRUARY 3, 2011, ALSO THE DATE OF WHICH FRAUD WAS COMMITED, FALSE ALLEGATIONS THAT ISIS SHAW AND MICHYL SHAW WERE ALLEGEDLY MISSING. ALLEGATIONS NEVER SPOKEN AGAIN IN ANY COURT PROCEEDINGS VERIFIABLE BY COURT RECORD OF MINUTES OF THE COURT THAT NO REFERENCE OF SUPPORTIVE AFFIDAVITS, NOT CRIMINAL CHARGES HAD BEEN ENTERED INTO COURT, RATHER A CONTINUATION OF UNFOUNDED HARASSMENT INITIATED NOT BY THE PATERNAL DAD'S BUT THROUGH MISCONDUCT OF FLORIDA DCF CHILD PROTECTION INVESTIGATOR DIVISION. IT IS FURTHER NOTES THAT MULTIPLE EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT OCCURRED CONCEALING THE MISCONDUCT BY A DCF EMPLOYEE. SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS MACKEY Heather Morcroft (Appellate Atty) 20 n Orange Ave Ste 700 Orlando 32801 FBN 0709859 407-325-3585 Attorney for Jarrid D. Williams Carlos Alberto Gonzalez Bar Number: 656755 Mail Address: Wayne Starr P.A. PO Box 560206 Orlando, FL 32856-0206 United States Office: 407-228-7280 Fax: 407-228-4296 Email: waynestarr@cfl.rr.com Personal Bar URL: www.floridabar.org/mybar profile/656755 vCard: County: Orange Circuit: 9 Admitted: 05/15/1987 10-Year Discipline History: None Law School: Stetson University College of Law, 1986 Thank you for > contacting the Attorney General's Office regarding > ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT . Our > staff will process it as soon as possible and, if necessary, > respond appropriately. We appreciate hearing from concerned > citizens such as yourself. If you wish to keep abreast of > the activities of this office, you may wish to consider a > subscription to our electronic newsletter Weekly > Briefing. Or perhaps > our Consumer > Alerts. Should you wish to > subscribe to either, or both, publications, please visit > oursubscription > page. > > > > > > > > > > COMPLAINT FILED > AGAINST > RUSSELL SCOTT > HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire= > Retained > 407-786-2889( > 1110 Douglas > Ave > Altamonte Springs, FL > 32714 > (407) > 786-2889 > http://www.russellhlaw.com > > > > ATTORNEY > MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT & CHILD SUPPORT > RECOVERY ACT VIOLATIONS, FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION > LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING > JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW > VIOLATIONS > > > > > http://www.hinshawlaw.com/the-lawyers-lawyer-newsletter---recent-developments-in-risk-management-03-09-2012/ > > > Duty to report > misconduct; code of > conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 > > > > > ( TORT LAW: A tort is a > civil wrong resulting from a violation of a legal right not > created by contract for which monetary redress is provided. > This may be (a) an act or (b) an omission. More formally, a > tort may be defined as a wrongful act or omission arising in > the course of social re ships other than contracts which > violates a person's legally protected rights for which > the law provides a remedy in the form of an action for > damages. > > > There are two basic > classifications of torts: (a) negligence which is the result > of an unintentional act (b) intentional acts or omissions > which results in a breach of someone's rights. There is > a third group in this area that should be explained. It is > referred to as strict liability.) > > > > > > > 8-2.241 > > > Civil Laws Governing Law > Enforcement Misconduct > BUT ALSO LAWS THAT ARE > FOR THE PREVENTION OF NEGLECT OF THE CHILD. > 827.03 Abuse, aggravated > abuse, and neglect of a child; penalties.— > > > intentional act that > could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental > injury to > a child; > or > (c) Active encouragement > of any person to commit an act that results or could > reasonably be > expected to result in > physical or mental injury to a child. > A person who knowingly or > willfully abuses a child without causing great bodily > harm, > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: professional > misconduct, failure to comply nonprofit compliance, ethnic > biasness and duty to report misconduct by attorney of > judicial misconduct > > > signed and filed a valid > declaration of paternity that has the force and effect of > a judgment, enforceable by contempt > REQUIREMENT OF > STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED PROCEDURES TO IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS > OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT > > > Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] > (a) In order to satisfy section 454(20)(A), each State must > have in effect laws requiring the use of the following > procedures, consistent with this section and with > regulations of the Secretary, to increase the effectiveness > of the program which the State administers under this > part: > > > > > Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] > (a > > > (C) Voluntary paternity > acknowledgment.— > > > (iv) Use of paternity > acknowledgment affidavit.—Such procedures must require the > State to develop and use an affidavit for the voluntary > acknowledgment of paternity which includes the minimum > requirements of the affidavit specified by the Secretary > under section 452(a)(7) for the voluntary acknowledgment of > paternity, and to give full faith and credit to such an > affidavit signed in any other State according to its > procedures. > > > > THERE HAS BEEN A BREACH > OF DUTY/NEGLECT OF DUTY WHEREAS ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION WOULD > HAVE REMEDIED AN EXTENSIVE DELAY IN PROVIDING ADEQUATE CHILD > SUPPORT OR FINANCIAL SUPPORT. IT IS ALSO MORE THAT SUSPECTED > THAT THE UNTIMELY DELAYS AREASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING > BREACH(ES) > the 1996 reforms require > States to adopt laws that give the CSE agency authority to > initiate a series of expedited procedures without the > necessity of obtaining an order from any other > administrative agency or judicial tribunal > > > and > > > > > > > The Violence > Against Women Act of 1994 (VAWA) and the 1997 Omnibus > Consolidated Appropriations Act > > > > > and > > > > > MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER > STATE AND FEDERAL LAW > > > You cannot use > information available to you because of your job, but > not > available to the public, > for your personal benefit or for the benefit of > others. > § 112.313(8), Fla. > Stat. > > > Title VI allows persons > to file administrative complaints with the federal > departments and agencies that provide financial assistance > alleging discrimination based on race, color, or national > origin by recipients of federal funds. > Under Title VI, EPA has a > responsibility to ensure that its funds are not being used > to subsidize discrimination based on race, color, or > national origin. This prohibition against discrimination > under Title VI has been a statutory mandate since 1964 and > EPA has had Title VI regulations since 1973. > EPA's Office of Civil > Rights is responsible for the Agency's administration of > Title VI, including investigation of such ... > > > A registered support > order is confirmed and immediately enforceable unless the > respondent files an objection in a record within a fixed > period of time, almost invariably the 20 days suggested > originally, Sections 603 and 607. > Section > 604. > > > > > TITLE 42 SECTIONS 666 AND > 654, 657 COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION CITATION FROM THE > FEDERAL STATUTE OF THE US CODE > § 657. Distribution of > collected support > > > > > The following is an > abstract from the Administration for Children and > Families' website and the Administration for Child > Support Enforcement, both of which publish all statutory > guidelines for the collection of child support and payments > thereof to the recipient. > collection and > distribution of child support payments Within this site it > is defined as follows Frequently Asked Questions about Child > Support Collection/Distribution For answers to questions > about your own case, you need to check with your local or > state child support office. State CSE agency telephone > numbers and addresses are at > (English):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ > directories/ext/IVd_list.cfm > (Spanish):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ > directories/ext/Espanol_IVd_ list.cfm State CSE agency web > site links are on our web site at the following > location: > http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/ > programs/cse/extinf.htm#exta The following general > information may be helpful: If the state collects more in a > month than is to be paid to the family for their current and > past due support, the rest of the money can be used to repay > the state and federal governments for cash assistance * AFDC > or TANF * that a family received. Also, child support > agencies can recover all or part of the costs of their > services from people who are not in a cash assistance > program. These can include the cost of legal work done by > agency attorneys or the costs of locating a parent, for > example. The money may be deducted from the child support > payment, or it may be collected from the noncustodial > parent. For more information on changes in the law and how > they may affect you, as well as the cost recovery practices > of your State, you should contact your State child support > enforcement agency. > > > > > > > Case Type: Paternity > DOR > Date Filed: > 08/29/2005 > Location: Div > 42 > Judicial Officer: Evans, > Robert M > > > Uniform Case Number: > 482005DR014270A001OX > > > Related Case Information > Related Cases > 2002-DR-006249-O > (Paternity) > Party > Information > > > Lead > Attorneys > Petitioner SHAW, SHEILA > JOCELYN BARBARA FANCHER (LIMITED) JONES, > Esquire > Retained > 407-849-1133(W) > > > Respondent GONZALEZ, > CARLOS ALBERTO > > > Events & Orders of > the Court DISPOSITIONS > 05/15/2012 > Order Denying (Judicial > Officer: Evans, Robert M) > > Tuesday, June 18, > 2013 12:39 PM > Subject: ATTORNEY > GENERAL COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST Hershkowitz Russell S > Attorney Category: Bankruptcy Law [Edit] 1110 Douglas Ave > Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 (407) 786-2889 > http://www.russellhlaw.com > > > > > > > Thank you for > contacting the Attorney General's Office regarding > ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT . Our > staff will process it as soon as possible and, if necessary, > respond appropriately. We appreciate hearing from concerned > citizens such as yourself. If you wish to keep abreast of > the activities of this office, you may wish to consider a > subscription to our electronic newsletter Weekly > Briefing. Or perhaps > our Consumer > Alerts. Should you wish to > subscribe to either, or both, publications, please visit > oursubscription > page. > > > > > > > > > > COMPLAINT FILED > AGAINST > RUSSELL SCOTT > HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire= > Retained > 407-786-2889( > 1110 Douglas > Ave > Altamonte Springs, FL > 32714 > (407) > 786-2889 > http://www.russellhlaw.com > > > > ATTORNEY > MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT & CHILD SUPPORT > RECOVERY ACT VIOLATIONS, FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION > LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING > JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW > VIOLATIONS > > > > > http://www.hinshawlaw.com/the-lawyers-lawyer-newsletter---recent-developments-in-risk-management-03-09-2012/ > > > Duty to report > misconduct; code of > conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 > > Edit with the Docs app Make tweaks, leave comments, and share with others to edit at the same time. NO THANKSUSE THE APP ACAP ATTY COMPLAINT 112,FRAUD ON THE COURT INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM ATTACHED DOCUMENT TO THE FLORIDA BAR THE SPECIFIC THING OR THINGS I AM COMPLAINING ABOUT ARE: THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA JOCELYN SHAW PO BOX 5147, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33657-5175 PARTY TO THE COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S) FLORIDA BAR MEMBER(S): SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS MACKEY Heather Morcroft (Appellate Atty) 20 n Orange Ave Ste 700 Orlando 32801 FBN 0709859 407-325-3585 INFORMS THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (ACAP) WITHIN THE TIME AND STATUTORY LIMITATIONS OF 6 SIX YEARS, THAT THE FOREGOING COMPLAINT IS IN REGARDS TO THE VIOLATIONS SET FORTH: http://www.floridabar.org/divexe/rrtfb.nsf/FV/0B6C8E5CDCA464D685257172004B0FBD 4-8 MAINTAINING THE INTEGRITY OF THE PROFESSION RULE 4-8.4 MISCONDUCT THAT ON THE ONSET OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA SHAW, AS THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION 7, ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT: Juvenile Division 2000 E. Michigan St. Suite 300 Orlando, FL 32806 PROCEEDING WERE COMMENCED WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE HISTORICAL AND CONCURRENT CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS, AND HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS CONCURRENTLY PUBLISHED IN DIVISION 42 COURT, VIA CLERK OF THE ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE RISS DATABASE, THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR ACCOUNTS OF INTERAGENCY ACCESS WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. THE COMPLAINANT MAKES REFERENCE THAT THE ATTORNEY’S, WITH KNOWLEDGE, ACTED IN A DECEITFUL MANNER, NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF FRAUD RELATIVE TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS. "ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW WERE DIVESTED AND SUBSEQUENT LEGAL CAUSATION INCLUSIVE OF : 1. A MATERIAL INJURY IN THE PROCEEDINGS BELOW THAT CANNOT BE CONCLUDED ON POST JUDGEMENT APPEAL,2. INJURY WAS CAUSED BY A DEPARTURE FORM THE ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW (WHEN THEY ARE VIOLATED) OCCURRED. IMPROPER PURPOSE USED TO ACCESS TO THE FACILITY/HARASSMENT & TORTS)CONTINUATION OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT Fw: REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION TO REOPEN CASE CASE NO 2005-DR-014270-O DIVISION 42; Fw: ATTN KEITH PARKS Action founded on negligence, fraud and white collar criminal behavior 39.0141 A Missing Children Report is Required and is found to be absent in all proceedings prior to date. & 95.11 Tort actions for fraud or assault & 39.0014,39.0141 MISSING CHILDRENS REPORT REQUIRED WHICH IN ITS ABSENCE AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS CONSTITUTES FRAUD. TORT ACTIONS OF FRAUD INCLUSIVE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND VAWA BY THE FATHERS TO CASE WHO KNEW THE ALLEGATIONS WERE FALSE THE ATTORNEY’S TO CASE DID NOT CONSOLIDATE THE TWO DIVISIONS, DIVISION 7 AND DIVISION 42, WITH KNOWLEDGE THAT A “THRESHOLD OF DEMONSTRATIVE SHOWING OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT” IN ADDITION TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CHILD WOULD BE NECESSARY UNDER PROVISIONS OUTLINED REGARDING MINORS TO JUVENILE DEPENDENCY COURT CIVIL RULES OF PRACTICE, FLORIDA STATUTES CHAPTER 39.PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO CHILDREN THE DEVASTATION FROM THE PRESIDING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL PROCESS ALONG WITH THE STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT, ATTORNEY DECEIT INCLUDED THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS: § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. Civil contempt is conduct directed against the rights of the opposing party. law-imposed obligation ;"an act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere with the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the dignity of the court or respect for its authority. There are two kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct contempt openly and in the presence of the court, resists the power of the court, 102 A. 400, 406; and consequential, or constructive contempt results from matters outside the court, such as failure to comply with orders. The basic standards governing fraud on the court are reasonably straightforward. As set forth in Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998): The requisite fraud on the court occurs where “it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.” Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989) . . . . The trial court has the inherent authority, within the exercise of sound judicial discretion, to dismiss an action when a plaintiff has perpetrated a fraud on the court, or where a party refuses to comply with court orders. Kornblum v. Schneider, 609 So. 2d 138, 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). The types of issues raised in habeas corpus petitions were coded into the following categories: ineffective assistance of counsel (failure to object to admissibility/sufficiency of evidence, failure to call witnesses, failure to cross-examine, and failure to object to denial of a continuance notion), trial court errors (failure to suppress improper evidence, improper jury instructions), (failure to disclose, use of perjured testimony, and inflammatory summation), 4th amendment (unlawful arrest), 5th amendment Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Title VIII consists of seven sections and is also referred to as the "Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of 2002". It describes specific criminal penalties for manipulation, destruction or alteration of financial records or other interference with investigations, while providing certain protections for whistleblowers. cc: (http://www.floridabar.org/divexe/rrtfb.nsf/FV/0B6C8E5CDCA464D685257172004B0FBD) A lawyer shall not: (a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another; (b) commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects; (c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, except that it shall not be professional misconduct for a lawyer for a criminal law enforcement agency or regulatory agency to advise others about or to supervise another in an undercover investigation, unless prohibited by law or rule, and it shall not be professional misconduct for a lawyer employed in a capacity other than as a lawyer by a criminal law enforcement agency or regulatory agency to participate in an undercover investigation, unless prohibited by law or rule; (d) engage in conduct in connection with the practice of law that is prejudicial to the administration of justice, including to knowingly, or through callous indifference, disparage, humiliate, or discriminate against litigants, jurors, witnesses, court personnel, or other lawyers on any basis, including, but not limited to, on account of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, national origin, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, age, socioeconomic status, employment, or physical characteristic; (e) state or imply an ability to influence improperly a government agency or official or to achieve results by means that violate the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law; (f) knowingly assist a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct or other law; (g) fail to respond, in writing, to any official inquiry by bar counsel or a disciplinary agency, as defined elsewhere in these rules, when bar counsel or the agency is conducting an investigation into the lawyer's conduct. A written response shall be made:(1) within 15 days of the date of the initial written investigative inquiry by bar counsel, grievance committee, or board of governors; (2) within 10 days of the date of any follow-up written investigative inquiries by bar counsel, grievance committee, or board of governors; (3) within the time stated in any subpoena issued under these Rules Regulating The Florida Bar (without additional time allowed for mailing); (4) as provided in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure or order of the referee in matters assigned to a referee; and (5) as provided in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure or order of the Supreme Court of Florida for matters pending action by that court. Except as stated otherwise herein or in the applicable rules, all times for response shall be calculated as provided elsewhere in these Rules Regulating The Florida Bar and may be extended or shortened by bar counsel or the disciplinary agency making the official inquiry upon good cause shown. Failure to respond to an official inquiry with no good cause shown may be a matter of contempt and processed in accordance with rule 3-7.11(f) of these Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. (h) willfully refuse, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, to timely pay a child support obligation; or (i) engage in sexual conduct with a client or a representative of a client that exploits or adversely affects the interests of the client or the lawyer-client relationship. If the sexual conduct commenced after the lawyer-client relationship was formed it shall be presumed that the sexual conduct exploits or adversely affects the interests of the client or the lawyer-client relationship. A lawyer may rebut this presumption by proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the sexual conduct did not exploit or adversely affect the interests of the client or the lawyer-client relationship. The prohibition and presumption stated in this rule do not apply to a lawyer in the same firm as another lawyer representing the client if the lawyer involved in the sexual conduct does not personally provide legal services to the client and is screened from access to the file concerning the legal representation.Comment Lawyers are subject to discipline when they violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another, as when they request or instruct an agent to do so on the lawyer's behalf. Subdivision (a), however, does not prohibit a lawyer from advising a client concerning action the client is legally entitled to take, provided that the client is not used to indirectly violate the Rules of Professional Conduct. Many kinds of illegal conduct reflect adversely on fitness to practice law, such as offenses involving fraud and the offense of willful failure to file an income tax return. However, some kinds of offense carry no such implication. Traditionally, the distinction was drawn in terms of offenses involving "moral turpitude." That concept can be construed to include offenses concerning some matters of personal morality, such as adultery and comparable offenses, that have no specific connection to fitness for the practice of law. Although a lawyer is personally answerable to the entire criminal law, a lawyer should be professionally answerable only for offenses that indicate lack of those characteristics relevant to law practice. Offenses involving violence, dishonesty, breach of trust, or serious interference with the administration of justice are in that category. A pattern of repeated offenses, even ones of minor significance when considered separately, can indicate indifference to legal obligation. A lawyer may refuse to comply with an obligation imposed by law upon a good faith belief that no valid obligation exists. The provisions of rule 4-1.2(d) concerning a good faith challenge to the validity, scope, meaning, or application of the law apply to challenges of legal regulation of the practice of law. Subdivision (c) recognizes instances where lawyers in criminal law enforcement agencies or regulatory agencies advise others about or supervise others in undercover investigations, and provides an exception to allow the activity without the lawyer engaging in professional misconduct. The exception acknowledges current, acceptable practice of these agencies. Although the exception appears in this rule, it is also applicable to rules 4-4.1 and 4-4.3. However, nothing in the rule allows the lawyer to engage in such conduct if otherwise prohibited by law or rule. Subdivision (d) of this rule proscribes conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice. Such proscription includes the prohibition against discriminatory conduct committed by a lawyer while performing duties in connection with the practice of law. The proscription extends to any characteristic or status that is not relevant to the proof of any legal or factual issue in dispute. Such conduct, when directed towards litigants, jurors, witnesses, court personnel, or other lawyers, whether based on race, ethnicity, gender, religion, national origin, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, age, socioeconomic status, employment, physical characteristic, or any other basis, subverts the administration of justice and undermines the public's confidence in our system of justice, as well as notions of equality. This subdivision does not prohibit a lawyer from representing a client as may be permitted by applicable law, such as, by way of example, representing a client accused of committing discriminatory conduct. Lawyers holding public office assume legal responsibilities going beyond those of other citizens. A lawyer's abuse of public office can suggest an inability to fulfill the professional role of attorney. The same is true of abuse of positions of private trust such as trustee, executor, administrator, guardian, or agent and officer, director, or manager of a corporation or other organization. A lawyer's obligation to respond to an inquiry by a disciplinary agency is stated in subdivision (g) of this rule and subdivision (h)(2) of rule 3-7.6. While response is mandatory, the lawyer may deny the charges or assert any available privilege or immunity or interpose any disability that prevents disclosure of a certain matter. A response containing a proper invocation thereof is sufficient under the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. This obligation is necessary to ensure the proper and efficient operation of the disciplinary system. Subdivision (h) of this rule was added to make consistent the treatment of attorneys who fail to pay child support with the treatment of other professionals who fail to pay child support, in accordance with the provisions of section 61.13015, Florida Statutes. That section provides for the suspension or denial of a professional license due to delinquent child support payments after all other available remedies for the collection of child support have been exhausted. Likewise, subdivision (h) of this rule should not be used as the primary means for collecting child support, but should be used only after all other available remedies for the collection of child support have been exhausted. Before a grievance may be filed or a grievance procedure initiated under this subdivision, the court that entered the child support order must first make a finding of willful refusal to pay. The child support obligation at issue under this rule includes both domestic (Florida) and out-of-state (URESA) child support obligations, as well as arrearages. Subdivision (i) proscribes exploitation of the client or the lawyer-client relationship by means of commencement of sexual conduct. The lawyer-client relationship is grounded on mutual trust. A sexual relationship that exploits that trust compromises the lawyer-client relationship. Attorneys have a duty to exercise independent professional judgment on behalf of clients. Engaging in sexual relationships with clients has the capacity to impair the exercise of that judgment.FALSE STATEMENTS MISCONDUCT FALSE KIDNAPPING REPORTS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AND TO THE JUVENILE COURT LEGAL PHILANTHROPY MISUSE OF OFFICE INSTITUTIONAL CHILD ABUSE LEGAL ABUSE LAWYER MISCONDUCT ETHNIC BIASEDNESS MOCKERY TRIAL ERROR INTENTIONAL OMISSIONS ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NON SUPPORT & CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY ACT VIOLATIONS, FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW VIOLATIONS THAT ON THE ONSET OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA SHAW, AS THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION 7, ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT: Juvenile Division 2000 E. Michigan St. Suite 300 Orlando, FL 32806 PROCEEDING WERE COMMENCED WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE HISTORICAL AND CONCURRENT CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS, AND HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS CONCURRENTLY PUBLISHED IN DIVISION 42 COURT, VIA CLERK OF THE ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE RISS DATABASE, THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR ACCOUNTS OF INTERAGENCY ACCESS WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. THE COMPLAINANT MAKES REFERENCE THAT THE ATTORNEY’S, WITH KNOWLEDGE, ACTED IN A DECEITFUL MANNER, NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF FRAUD RELATIVE TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS. "ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW WERE DIVESTED AND SUBSEQUENT LEGAL CAUSATION INCLUSIVE OF : 1. A MATERIAL INJURY IN THE PROCEEDINGS BELOW THAT CANNOT BE CONCLUDED ON POST JUDGEMENT APPEAL,2. INJURY WAS CAUSED BY A DEPARTURE FORM THE ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW (WHEN THEY ARE VIOLATED) OCCURRED. THE ATTORNEY’S TO CASE DID NOT CONSOLIDATE THE TWO DIVISIONS, DIVISION 7 AND DIVISION 42, WITH KNOWLEDGE THAT A “THRESHOLD OF DEMONSTRATIVE SHOWING OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT” IN ADDITION TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CHILD WOULD BE NECESSARY UNDER PROVISIONS OUTLINED REGARDING MINORS TO JUVENILE DEPENDENCY COURT CIVIL RULES OF PRACTICE, FLORIDA STATUTES CHAPTER 39.PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO CHILDREN THE DEVASTATION FROM THE PRESIDING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL PROCESS ALONG WITH THE STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT, ATTORNEY DECEIT INCLUDED THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS: § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. Civil contempt is conduct directed against the rights of the opposing party. law-imposed obligation ;"an act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere with the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the dignity of the court or respect for its authority. There are two kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct contempt openly and in the presence of the court, resists the power of the court, 102 A. 400, 406; and consequential, or constructive contempt results from matters outside the court, such as failure to comply with orders. The basic standards governing fraud on the court are reasonably straightforward. As set forth in Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998): The requisite fraud on the court occurs where “it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.” Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989) . . . . The trial court has the inherent authority, within the exercise of sound judicial discretion, to dismiss an action when a plaintiff has perpetrated a fraud on the court, or where a party refuses to comply with court orders. Kornblum v. Schneider, 609 So. 2d 138, 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). The types of issues raised in habeas corpus petitions were coded into the following categories: ineffective assistance of counsel (failure to object to admissibility/sufficiency of evidence, failure to call witnesses, failure to cross-examine, and failure to object to denial of a continuance notion), trial court errors (failure to suppress improper evidence, improper jury instructions), (failure to disclose, use of perjured testimony, and inflammatory summation), 4th amendment (unlawful arrest), 5th amendment Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Title VIII consists of seven sections and is also referred to as the "Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of 2002". It describes specific criminal penalties for manipulation, destruction or alteration of financial records or other interference with investigations, while providing certain protections for whistleblowers. cc: Letter regarding fraud on the court,absent administrative remedy or action in a timely manner, that such a biasedness occurred it is described as unconscionably ethnically biased, a white collar criminal act by a party who misused his/her office to aid and assist avoidance of judicial action, that the action was in violation of the minor to case’s rights, that the action was in violation of parental rights to recovery of child support and paternity establishment in the Orange County, Ninth Judicial Circuit and Court, Division 42. Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:39 PM Subject: ATTORNEY GENERAL COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST Hershkowitz Russell S Attorney Category: Bankruptcy Law [Edit] 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 (407) 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com Thank you for contacting the Attorney General's Office regarding ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT . Our staff will process it as soon as possible and, if necessary, respond appropriately. We appreciate hearing from concerned citizens such as yourself. If you wish to keep abreast of the activities of this office, you may wish to consider a subscription to our electronic newsletter Weekly Briefing. Or perhaps our Consumer Alerts. Should you wish to subscribe to either, or both, publications, please visit our subscription page. COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST RUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire= Retained 407-786-2889( 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 (407) 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NON SUPPORT & CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY ACT VIOLATIONS, FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW VIOLATIONS http://www.hinshawlaw.com/the-lawyers-lawyer-newsletter---recent-developments-in-risk-management-03-09-2012/ The duty to report misconduct is one of the ethical duties imposed on attorneys in the United States by the rules governing professional responsibility. With certain exceptions, an attorney who becomes aware that either a fellow attorney or a judge has committed an act in violation of the rules of e... Duty to report misconduct; code of conduct https://www.facebook.com/OrangClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 ( TORT LAW: A tort is a civil wrong resulting from a violation of a legal right not created by contract for which monetary redress is provided. This may be (a) an act or (b) an omission. More formally, a tort may be defined as a wrongful act or omission arising in the course of social re ships other than contracts which violates a person's legally protected rights for which the law provides a remedy in the form of an action for damages. There are two basic classifications of torts: (a) negligence which is the result of an unintentional act (b) intentional acts or omissions which results in a breach of someone's rights. There is a third group in this area that should be explained. It is referred to as strict liability.) 8-2.241 Civil Laws Governing Law Enforcement Misconduct BUT ALSO LAWS THAT ARE FOR THE PREVENTION OF NEGLECT OF THE CHILD. 827.03 Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; penalties.— intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child; or (c) Active encouragement of any person to commit an act that results or could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child. A person who knowingly or willfully abuses a child without causing great bodily harm, Subject: professional misconduct, failure to comply nonprofit compliance, ethnic biasedness and duty to report misconduct by attorney of judicial misconduct signed and filed a valid declaration of paternity that has the force and effect of a judgment, enforceable by contempt REQUIREMENT OF STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED PROCEDURES TO IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] (a) In order to satisfy section 454(20)(A), each State must have in effect laws requiring the use of the following procedures, consistent with this section and with regulations of the Secretary, to increase the effectiveness of the program which the State administers under this part: Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] (a (C) Voluntary paternity acknowledgment.— (iv) Use of paternity acknowledgment affidavit.—Such procedures must require the State to develop and use an affidavit for the voluntary acknowledgment of paternity which includes the minimum requirements of the affidavit specified by the Secretary under section 452(a)(7) for the voluntary acknowledgment of paternity, and to give full faith and credit to such an affidavit signed in any other State according to its procedures. THERE HAS BEEN A BREACH OF DUTY/NEGLECT OF DUTY WHEREAS ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION WOULD HAVE REMEDIED AN EXTENSIVE DELAY IN PROVIDING ADEQUATE CHILD SUPPORT OR FINANCIAL SUPPORT. IT IS ALSO MORE THAT SUSPECTED THAT THE UNTIMELY DELAYS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING BREACH(ES) the 1996 reforms require States to adopt laws that give the CSE agency authority to initiate a series of expedited procedures without the necessity of obtaining an order from any other administrative agency or judicial tribunal and The Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (VAWA) and the 1997 Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act and MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW You cannot use information available to you because of your job, but not available to the public, for your personal benefit or for the benefit of others. § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. Title VI allows Office of the Secretary Office of Re-Entry 501 S. Calhoun Street, Room 442 Tallahassee, FL, 32399 Main Number: (850) 717-3050 Fax: (850) 922-2238 Re-Entry Programs Staff Kim Riley | Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary / Director of Re-Entry | 850-717-3051 Riley.Kim@mail.dc.state.fl.us Patrick Mahoney | Chief of Transition and Substance Abuse Treatment Services | 850-717-3058 Mahoney.Patrick@mail.dc.state.fl.us John L. Lewis | Chief of Education | 850-717-3650 Lewis.John@mail.dc.state.fl.us Alex Taylor | Chaplaincy Services | 850-717-3157 Taylor.Alex@mail.dc.state.fl.us CITIZEN VICTIM COMPLAINT: SUBSTANCE ABUSE INVOLVING A MINOR, VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN HATE CRIMES AND FRAUDULENT TORTS, PARTICIPATION IN CONTINUED CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES RELATING TO MENTAL HEALTH OR DISABILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH: Jarrid Williams probation DC 346801 OFFICER HUDSON 40729720000 1991 drug charge controlled substance, 1993 Nov Dec1995, 2015 April controlled substance DUI 407 8363000 Jarrid Williams 1991 drug charge controlled substance, 1993 Nov Dec1995, 2015 April controlled substance DUI 407 8363000 Jarrid Williams/Fw: HATE CRIME/PUBLIC OFFICER STALKING THROUGH INTIMATE FAMILY TIES/INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE THROUGH INSTITUTIONAL VIOLENCE, PRESENTLY A PARENTAL ALIENATION TORT SUSPECTED INVOLVEMENT IN VEHICLE THEFTS CASE #s 535i BMW WBAHD2317K2091635 http://twitdoc.com/3Z89 RICO/Vehicle Theft/Auto Parts,original owner/seller Frank Furino the Owner of MAACO 917 Mercy Dr, Orl,FL32808. criminal enterprising through fraud,mail fraud, goo.gl/h9wjQr VICTIMS IN CASES Family violence complaint principal cases of origin Indiana associated complaint regarding dissolution/http://goo.gl/RvP2US, improper purpose MISUSE OF OFFICE,http://goo.gl/h9wjQr 775.0844 Aggravated white collar crime § 112.313(8), FL EMPLOYEE FAMILY TIES MISCONDUCT CF OPERATING PROCEDURE #180-4 MANDATORY REQUIRED http://goo.gl/h9wjQr CC: Florida Department of Corrections 501 South Calhoun Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-2500, (850) 717-3444, FAX: (850) 487-4427 E-Mail: co-supervision@mail.dc.state.fl.us 407-836-3652 ORANGE COUNTY FLORIDA PO ERICKA SEAMAN RE: complaints of domestic violence, parental alienation, fraud on the court, child abuse, VAWA complaint was made against JARRID DESHAUN WILLIAMS REGARDING MY DAUGHTER ISIS JASHUANA C. J. SHAW 4135 KIRKLAND BLVD, ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32810 THE REPORT WAS MADE TO JARRID D. WILLIAM’S COUNTY PROBATION OFFICER FOR WHICH JARRID DESHAUN WILLIAMS IS CURRENTLY ON COUNTY PROBATION FOR DUI WITH A MINOR, MY DAUGHTER ISIS JASHAUNA C. J. SHAW Complaint foregoes that Jarrid Deshaun Williams has been reported to the Florida Department of Children & Families on several incidents including child abuse, neglect, fraud, violence against women & children in addition to such an “outrageous” pattern of violence towards the child’s mother, Sheila Jocelyn Shaw, whereas the as the paternal party to the child custody case and child support case registered in Orange County, Jarrid Deshaun Williams was instructed to comply with THE PARENTAL RIGHTS OF SHEILA JOCELYN SHAW & VISITATION WITH THE MINOR of which Jarrid Deshaun Williams through the course of this period has abused the court order and is now in contempt of court by illustrating child concealment, false statements in the community against the mother, defamation and as previously stated child abuse by parental alienation. Mr. Williams’ conduct was reported to the probation officer regarding the criminal activities involved including criminal enterprising and faith based violence including fraud to block the child’s reunification with the mother, in addition to continued acts of violence which has been reported to law enforcement. The misconduct or negligence by the public officer(s) involving family ties has been the problem throughout the case including attorney misconduct and Florida Department of Families and Children Employee Misconduct including once again identification problems as to the “role” or “duties” in preventing further criminal activities by Jarrid Deshaun Williams in preinvestigation and ongoing investigations supplied to the courts in Orange County. Violation of Conduct or Professional Standards Duty of conduct- willful, intentional knowledge of the course of action or lack of action would result in further domestic violence or intentional misconduct that was meant to cause economic torts. Jarrid Deshaun Williams is a habitual drug substance abuse offender. Court Documentation states: ORANGE COUNTY COURT CASE HISTORIES THE LATER OF THE CASES WAS HEARD BY Judge: Tanya Davis Wilson, Case Type:Criminal Traffic Date Filed: 1/4/2015 Location Orlando - TR UCN: 482015CT000044000AOX 1/3/2015 OBTS:8 Sequence:1 Control Number:201500003938 Arresting Agency:Orlando Police Department 1. CT-DUI WITH MINOR IN CAR OR BAL OF .20 OR HIGHER Statute: 316.193(4) First Degree - Misd 1 2000-TR-011927-A-W STATE OF FLORIDA VS. JARRID DESHAUN WILLIAMS Civil Traffic Infraction 08/20/1970 W Michael Miller 02/03/2000 2 2008-TR-154128-A-O STATE OF FLORIDA VS. JARRID DESHAUN WILLIAMS Civil Traffic Infraction 08/20/1970 98 Hearing Officer 09/15/2008 3 2009-TR-035184-A-O STATE OF FLORIDA VS. JARRID DESHAUN WILLIAMS Civil Traffic Infraction 08/20/1970 98 Hearing Officer 03/19/2009 4 2010-TR-161844-A-O STATE OF FLORIDA vs. WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN Civil Traffic Infraction 08/20/1970 98 Hearing Officer 11/17/2010 5 2011-TR-018263-A-W STATE OF FLORIDA vs. WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN Civil Traffic Infraction 08/20/1970 95 Hearing Officer 05/10/2011 6 2012-TR-029701-A-O STATE OF FLORIDA vs. WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN Civil Traffic Infraction 08/20/1970 98 Hearing Officer 03/07/2012 7 2013-TR-072280-A-O STATE OF FLORIDA vs. WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN Civil Traffic Infraction 08/20/1970 98 Hearing Officer 06/10/2013 8 2013-TR-072282-A-O STATE OF FLORIDA vs. WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN Civil Traffic Infraction 08/20/1970 98 Hearing Officer 06/10/2013 9 2013-TR-078400-A-O STATE OF FLORIDA vs. WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN Civil Traffic Infraction 08/20/1970 98 Hearing Officer 06/15/2013 10 2015-CT-000044-A-O STATE OF FLORIDA vs. WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN Criminal Traffic 08/20/1970 Tanya Davis Wilson 01/04/2015 11 2015-TR-003700-A-O STATE OF FLORIDA vs. WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN Civil Traffic Infraction 08/20/1970 Tanya Davis Wilson 01/08/2015