WHITE COLLAR CRIMES ABUSE OF PROCESS PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT LAWYER MISCONDUCT JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT : June 2016

VAWA REPORT REGARDING NOT ONLY ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT IN CHILD CUSTODY MODIFICATION Intentionally omitted criminal nonsupport, offensive behaviour, professional misconduct and ethnic biasedness, child exploitation and institutional racism Title 42 section 42 1983, 14141 attorney prosecutorial child chustody exploitation including false statements never heard throughout case trial activity, false statements to commence proceedings Case Type: Paternity Date Filed: 4/24/2002 Location: Div 38 UCN: 482002DR006249A001OX Judge: Patricia A Doherty Status: Closed - SRS Date Description Pages Doc Request Doc 7/10/2013 Letter 12 3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address 1 1/1/2007 Case Reassigned to Division 2/11/2005 Notice 11/10/2004 Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 11/10/2004 Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Smith, Maura T 9/24/2004 Court Minutes 9/24/2004 Affidavit 9/13/2004 Pluries Summons Unserved 7/28/2004 Pluries Summons Served 7/27/2004 Notice of Hearing 7/16/2004 Motion to Dismiss 7/14/2004 Notice of Unavailability 7/14/2004 Notice Appearance of Counsel 7/1/2004 Affidavit of Lost/Destroyed Instrument 7/1/2004 Pluries Summons Issued 4/16/2004 Pluries Summons Issued 1/6/2004 Returned Mail 12/26/2003 Certificate of Mailing 12/26/2003 Affidavit 12/26/2003 Notice of Action Issued 10/13/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved 9/12/2003 Pluries Summons Issued 9/3/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved 9/3/2003 Affidavit 9/3/2003 Motion 9/3/2003 Motion for Default 9/3/2003 Affidavit 9/3/2003 Motion 9/3/2003 Motion for Default 8/4/2003 Pluries Summons Issued 7/31/2003 Request for Admissions 6/9/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved 5/21/2003 Pluries Summons Issued 5/1/2003 Third Party Summons 2/11/2003 Pluries Summons Issued 12/26/2002 Pluries Summons Served 11/8/2002 Pluries Summons Issued 9/24/2002 Pluries Summons Unserved 8/30/2002 Pluries Summons Issued 7/29/2002 Summons Returned 7/3/2002 Alias Summons Issued 5/15/2002 Summons Returned 4/24/2002 Summons Issued 4/24/2002 Affidavit of Non Military Service 4/24/2002 Request for Admissions 4/24/2002 Affidavit of Need 4/24/2002 Certificate of Compliance 4/24/2002 Financial Affidavit 4/24/2002 Civil Cover Sheet 4/24/2002 Petition 4/24/2002 Initial Judge Assigned Case Type: Paternity DOR Date Filed: 8/29/2005 Location: Div 42 UCN: 482005DR014270A001OX Judge: Heather P Rodriguez Status: Re-Closed Citation Number: Date Description Pages Doc Request Doc 3/3/2016 Returned Mail 3 2/11/2016 Order Denying 2 2/11/2016 Order Denying 2 4/14/2015 Motion to Vacate 10 4/14/2015 Notice 3 7/3/2013 Letter 5 3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address 1 8/7/2012 Letter 11 5/15/2012 Order Denying 1 5/7/2012 Birth Certificate 1 5/7/2012 Motion 107 5/7/2012 Civil Cover Sheet 2 4/2/2012 Notice of Change of Address 1 4/2/2012 Motion 74 12/5/2011 Letter 3 11/14/2011 Notice of Change of Address 1 9/19/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & Order 2 9/14/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 9/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 9/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 4/6/2011 Returned Mail 2 3/30/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & Order 3 3/28/2011 Child Support Information Sheet 1 3/28/2011 Certified Notice of Delinquent Support 1 3/28/2011 Notice to Depository 1 3/28/2011 Supplemental Financial Statement 1 3/28/2011 Court Minutes 1 3/28/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George 3/22/2011 Returned Mail 2 3/11/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment 1 2/24/2011 Notice of Change of Address 1 2/24/2011 Memorandum 7 2/24/2011 Copy/Copies 6 2/23/2011 Answer 6 2/18/2011 Alias Summons Returned Served 5 2/17/2011 Final Order 1 2/14/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George 1/14/2011 Returned Mail 2 1/4/2011 Notice of Hearing 1 1/4/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment 1 11/29/2010 Notice of Change of Address 1 10/22/2010 Order for Income Deduction 1 10/22/2010 Report/Recommendation and Final Judgment 4 10/19/2010 Court Minutes 1 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) 2 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) 2 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet 2 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet 1 10/19/2010 HEARING - Petition/Motion 10/8/2010 Returned Mail 2 9/20/2010 Order for Non Jury Trial 1 9/17/2010 Notice for Trial 1 8/12/2010 Response 2 6/14/2010 Alias Summons Issued 4 4/9/2010 Summons Returned Unserved 5 12/17/2009 Summons Issued 4 12/17/2009 Certificate of Compliance 2 12/17/2009 Financial Affidavit 4 12/17/2009 Petition 4 12/17/2009 Request for Admissions 1 11/1/2006 Notice of Change of Address 9/28/2006 HRS673 to Bureau 7/19/2006 Letter 7/19/2006 Letter 5/9/2006 Final Judgment 5/9/2006 Order for Income Deduction 5/9/2006 Disposed by Non-Jury Trial 5/9/2006 Final Judgment 5/8/2006 HRS673 to Bureau 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 4/28/2006 Affidavit 4/28/2006 Affidavit 4/28/2006 Court Minutes 3/29/2006 Order for Non Jury Trial 3/29/2006 Notice of Hearing 3/29/2006 Notice for Trial 3/29/2006 Request to Produce 3/28/2006 Request for Admissions 3/28/2006 Notice of Filing HLA Tissue Typing 2/9/2006 Notice 1/10/2006 HRS673 to Bureau 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 Court Minutes 1/5/2006 Financial Affidavit 1/5/2006 Child Support Information Sheet 1/5/2006 Child Support Information Sheet 12/6/2005 Notice of Hearing 12/6/2005 Order for Non Jury Trial 12/6/2005 Request to Produce 12/6/2005 Notice for Trial 12/5/2005 Answer 10/31/2005 Summons Returned 10/31/2005 Summons Returned 10/27/2005 Answer Denying Allegations 8/29/2005 Summons Issued 8/29/2005 Request for Admissions 8/29/2005 Certificate of Compliance 8/29/2005 Financial Affidavit 8/29/2005 Notice of Social Security 8/29/2005 Civil Cover Sheet 8/29/2005 Petition 8/29/2005 Initial Judge Assigned VOR (Viewable on Request) Certain case documents contain sensitive or personally identifiable information that must be manually redacted before they are viewable by the general public. Documents listed in the Docket Events section as VOR are public documents that require further redaction by Clerk staff before they can be viewed. Follow the steps below to request access to these documents: Check the Request Doc checkbox for the document you wish to view. You may repeat this for other VOR documents on the same case. Once all document requests have been made for this case, click the Submit button. A confirmation screen will display, where you will be asked to enter or confirm your email address to finalize your request. You will receive an initial email notification to confirm your request, followed by additional email notifications as requested documents become available. The Clerk’s office makes every effort to complete these requests in a timely manner. For definitions of document types, please refer to our glossary. Hearings Date Hearing Time Location Pages Doc 3/28/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 AM 2/14/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 AM 10/19/2010 Petition/Motion 1:00 PM 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 8:00 AM 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM Cause of Action Fraud Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141: makes it unlawful for state or local law enforcement agencies to allow officers to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives persons of rights protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. This law is commonly referred to as the Police Misconduct Statute. the exintimate partner and public officer employee misconduct BUSINESS TORT RELATED-ADVERSARIAL TORTS OR MATERNAL INJURIES WITH INTENT http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer_29.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/any-police-department-receiving-federal.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/family-violence-prevention-act-victim.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/false-cpi-personal-torts-tort-of-fraud.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/jarrid-williams-probation-dc-346801.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/201 Federal laws Federal law 42 U.S.C. § 5772 & 42 U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5772) defines a "missing child" as "any individual less than 18 years of age whose whereabouts are unknown to such individual"s legal custodian." RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. 827.03 Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; penalties.— intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child; or (c) Active encouragement of any person to commit an act that results or could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child. A person who knowingly or willfully abuses a child without causing great bodily harm, http://definitions.uslegal/ com/w/willful-professional- misconduct PRINCIPAL CASES - HOME STATE ORIGIN INDIANA REGISTER OF ACTIONS CASE NO. 1993-CF-008458-AO cases: OC9901243 PA cases OC9901243 and 02-83719047104532 PA Cause number 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL Narrative "an act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere with the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the dignity of the court or respect for its authority. There are two kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct contempt openly and in the presence of the court, resists the power of the court, 102 A. 400, 406; and consequential, or constructive contempt results from matters outside the court, such as failure to comply... MISUSE OF OFFICE TO ENGAGE IN RACIAL PROFILING, FRAUD, AIDING AND ABETTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT RECOVERY BY FALSE ALLEGATIONS USED TO ABATE DEPARTMENTAL COLLECTION INTERVENTIONS ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT AND MOTHER TO CASES IN THE FAMILY COURT, AND CHILD SUPPORT OCSE, AFFILIATED WITH FLORIDA DCF DEPARTMENTAL RISS SYSTEM DATABASES ON FEBRUARY 4TH, 2011 DURING WHICH TIME COURT DATES OR CONCURRENT ENFORCEMENT ACTION WAS BEING UNDERGONE. CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 MANDATORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERA #Employee Misconduct http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/03/7750844white-collar-crime-victim.html, http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/12/you-cannot-use-information-available-to.html OIG Investigative and Law Enforcement Authority The Office of Inspector General (OIG), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), was administratively established by the Secretary of Agriculture in 1962 following a major criminal fraud scandal affecting several agencies within USDA. OIG was later legislatively established by Congress under the Inspector General Act of 1978 (Public Law [P.L.] 95-452), as amended. Pursuant to the Inspector General Act of 1978 and Section 1337 of the Agriculture and Food Act of 1981 (P.L. 97-98), OIG Investigations is the law enforcement arm of the Department, with Department-wide investigative jurisdiction. OIG Special Agents conduct investigations of significant criminal activities involving USDA programs, operations, and personnel, and are authorized to make arrests, execute warrants, and carry firearms. The types of investigations conducted by OIG Special Agents involve criminal activities such as frauds in subsidy, price support, benefits, and insurance programs; significant thefts of Government property or funds; bribery; extortion; smuggling; and assaults on employees. Investigations involving criminal activity that affects the health and safety of the public, such as meat packers who knowingly sell hazardous food products and individuals who tamper with food regulated by USDA, are also high-profile investigative priorities. In addition, OIG Special Agents are poised to provide emergency law enforcement response to USDA declared emergencies and suspected incidents of terrorism affecting USDA regulated industries, as well as USDA programs, operations, personnel, and installations, in coordination with Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies, as appropriate. The enactment of the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-37) authorized OIG to receive funds and property through criminal and civil Federal forfeiture proceedings, and through equitable sharing of forfeited funds and property controlled by the U.S. Department of Justice. Forfeiture proceeds have severe restrictions mandated by statutes and U.S. Department of Justice policy as to how they are used. Forfeiture funds cannot be used in lieu of the OIG's regular appropriations. False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE (NO. 180-4 https://drive.google.com/folder/d/0B84_tgjFbXNLcUpfaDBSRHBSZDQ/editATORY REPORTING REQUIiREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Clearly outlines employee fraud and misconduct within the scope of cause f action by the Office of the Inspector General within the Florida Departmentof Children. § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § 775.085) (complaint ACAP THE FLORIDA BAR INQUIRY COMPLAINT FORM http://goo.gl/h9wjQr) http://www.dcf.state.fl.us/admin/ig/content/AR2013-14.pdf Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses wdith false reporting for adults. https://oig.justice.gov/hotline/contact-doj.htm cc: letter to OIG FL DCF Keith Parks Resending Complaint Attached Department form (complaint ACAP THE FLORIDA BAR INQUIRY COMPLAINT FORM Fw: ATTN KEITH PARKS CONTINUING INSPECTOR GENERAL MANDATORY REPORTING TO IG OFFICE, MISCONDUCT COMPLAINT Aug 10, 2015, 12:19 PM § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § 775.085 Enhances penalty for crimes evidencing "prejudice based on the race, color, ancestry, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, mental or physical disability, or advanced age of the victim. The duty to report misconduct is one of the ethical duties imposed on attorneys in the United States by the rules governing professional responsibility http://www.iape.org/index.php http://definitions.uslegal. com/w/willful-professional- misconduct/ Rule 8.3—Reporting Professional Misconduct (a) A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, shall inform the appropriate professional authority. (b) A lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for office shall inform the appropriate authority. (c) This rule does not require disclosure of information otherwise protected by Rule 1.6 or other law TITLE 42 SECTIONS 666 AND 654, 657 COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION CITATION FROM THE FEDERAL STATUTE OF THE US CODE § 657. Distribution of collected support 50 STATE TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT PROCESS http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/child-support-process-administrative-vs-judicial.aspx Child support orders can be established by the courts or by an administrative entity. Statutes Pertaining to Violations of Civil Rights Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Every person who, under color or any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of any State of Territory, subjects ... any citizen of the United States ... to the deprivation of any rights, privileges or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress. Felony to Interfere With Civil Rights Title 42 U.S.C § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights (1) Preventing officer from performing duty. If two or more persons ... conspire to prevent ... any person from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof; or to injure him in his person or property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official duties. (2) Obstructing justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror. If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to deter, by force, intimidation, or threat, any party or witness in any court of the United States from attending such court, or from testifying to any matter pending therein, freely, fully, and truthfully, or to injure such party or witness in his person or property on account of his having so attended or testified, or to influence the verdict, presentment, or indictment of any grand or petit juror in any such court, or to injure such juror in his person or property on account of any verdict, presentment, or indictment lawfully assented to by him, or of his being or having been such juror; or if two or more persons conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the law, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws; (3) Depriving persons of rights or privileges. If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire, or go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another, for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws, or for the purpose of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of any State or Territory from giving or securing to all persons within such State or Territory the equal protection of the laws; ... or to injure any citizen in person or property on account of such support or advocacy; in any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages, occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators. Title 42 U.S.C. § 1985 pertains to a conspiracy to interfere with civil rights, (1) to prevent an officer from performing a duty; (2) obstructing justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror; (3) or depriving persons of rights or privileges. Title 42 U.S.C. § 1986. Action for neglect to prevent conspiracy Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned in the preceding section [42 USCS § 1985], are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses to do so, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented; And such damages may be recovered in an action on the case; and any number of persons guilty of such wrongful neglect or refusal may be joined as defendants in the action, and if the death of any party be caused by any such wrongful act and neglect, the legal representatives of the deceased shall have such action therefore, and may recover not exceeding five thousand dollars damages therein, for the benefit of the widow of the deceased, if there be one, and if there be no widow, then for the benefit of the next of kin of the deceased. But no action under the provisions of this section shall be sustained which is not commenced within one year after the cause of action has accrued. Keith Parks, Inspector General 1317 Winewood Blvd., Bldg. 5, Second Floor Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700 Phone: (850) 488-1225 Fax: (850) 488-1428 Maxine McGregor Client Relations Coordinator Email: Maxine_McGregor@dcf.state.fl.us Address: 400 West Robinson Street Hurston Bldg., South Tower, S S-1106 Orlando Florida 32801 United States Phone Number: 407-317-7000 x7047 ACCESS Florida Gretchen Perry Client Relations Coordinator Address: 400 West Robinson Street Hurston Bldg., South Tower, S S-1106 Orlando Florida 32801 United States Phone Number: 407-317-7000 x7045 1) CPS may only place founded reports on the state's central registry of child abuse and neglect. (In some states, unfounded reports are placed on the central registry, which not only causes harm to innocent people but is also a violation of due process.) 2) Caseworkers must inform families if a report is anonymous. (There is a difference between anonymous and confidential—reporters’ names should be kept confidential, but anonymous reports are not as reliable as those made by known reporters.) 3) Parents must be allowed to select an unrelated adult to be present during interviews of their children. 4) Investigations must cease immediately upon discovery that the allegations are false. Continuing the investigation process despite proof of innocence only traumatizes the family and wastes state resources. 5) Parents must have access to the records of their investigations. HSLDA also continues to assist with incorporating the following two federal CAPTA requirements into state codes: 1) Requiring child protective services workers to be trained in their duty to protect the statutory and constitutional rights of those they are investigating. 2) Requiring child protective services personnel to advise individuals subject to a child abuse and neglect investigation of the complaint or allegation made against them. Notes 1. Children’s Bureau. (2003). Child Maltreatment. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved fromhttp://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm03/index.htm. 2. Calabretta v. Floyd, 189 F.3d 808 (1999). Claudia Hernandez 400 W. Robinson St. (Hurston South Tower) Ste. # S-509, Orlando, FL 32801-1718 WHITE COLLAR CRIMES ABUSE OF PROCESS PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT LAWYER MISCONDUCT JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT Saturday, 12 December 2015 You cannot use information available to you because of your job, but not available to the public, for your personal benefit or for the benefit of others. § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § 775.085 Enhances penalty for crimes evidencing "prejudice based on the race, color, ancestry, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, mental or physical disability, or advanced age of the victim. The duty to report misconduct is one of the ethical duties imposed on attorneys in the United States by the rules governing professional responsibility http://www.iape.org/index.php http://definitions.uslegal. com/w/willful-professional- misconduct/ Rule 8.3—Reporting Professional Misconduct (a) A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, shall inform the appropriate professional authority. (b) A lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for office shall inform the appropriate authority. (c) This rule does not require disclosure of information otherwise protected by Rule 1.6 or other law. http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309048893 Cases 2005-DR-014270-O (Paternity) P I I Lead Attorneys Petitioner SHAW, SHEILA J BARBARA FANCHER(LIMITED) JONES, Esquire Retained 407-849-1133(W) Respondent GONZALEZ, CARLOS A RUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire Retained 407-786-2889(W) E & O C & O C DISPOSITIONS 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 2004 OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS 01/01/ Case Reassigned to Division 2007 Case Reassigned to Division|CASE REASSIGNED TO JUDGE 38 02/11/ Notice 2005 Notice|NOTICE OF CONCLUSION OF REPRESENTATION 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 2004 Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing|FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL AFTER HEARING RECORDED RELATED CASES - PRINCIPAL JUDICIAL OR PROFESSION MISCONDUCT-FRAUD ON THE COURTS- PERSONAL AND BUSINESS TORT RELATED-ADVERSARIAL TORTS OR MATERNAL INJURIES WITH INTENT http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer_29.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/any-police-department-receiving-federal.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/family-violence-prevention-act-victim.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/false-cpi-personal-torts-tort-of-fraud.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/jarrid-williams-probation-dc-346801.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/201 Federal laws Federal law 42 U.S.C. § 5772 & 42 U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5772) defines a "missing child" as "any individual less than 18 years of age whose whereabouts are unknown to such individual"s legal custodian." RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. 827.03 Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; penalties.— intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child; or (c) Active encouragement of any person to commit an act that results or could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child. A person who knowingly or willfully abuses a child without causing great bodily harm, http://definitions.uslegal. com/w/willful-professional- misconduct PRINCIPAL CASES - HOME STATE ORIGIN INDIANA REGISTER OF ACTIONS CASE NO. 1993-CF-008458-AO cases: OC9901243 PA cases OC9901243 and 02-83719047104532 PA Cause number 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL 2010-DP 1170 FL INDIANA CASE NUMBERS Paternity case file no J18720 filed 11-16-71/11-24-71 order date Shirley Ann Shaw/Claude R. Jackson mariired December 31st, 1978 marriage license number CDR-94-114 Shirley Ann Shaw Joseph Nikolaenko marriage ended June 30, 1995 Buddmeeks Ctr Domestic case DCM-91-6993 1991 marriage license number 02D01-9707-ML-001399 07/08/97 married on 07/26/1997 DOB 04/21/46 Joseph Nikolaenko mother Michlaina Nikolaenko 5012 Pacer Run Ft. Wayne, IN Gwedolyn Ann Brown DOB 04/12/60 son Tyrese Dartanvan Brown father Thomas Lewis Brown mother Mary Lee Spann 3054 Schele Ave Ft. Wayne, IN Dorothy Jackson Claude Jackson married July 2, 1983 Divorce petition 02C01-9110-D1-1313 CDR-91-1313 "...Additionally, whether substantive or procedural misconduct is the basis for the sanction, the trial court must hold an evidentiary hearing before dismissing a case with prejudice,8 and must make an express finding that the conduct forming the basis for the dismissal was willful or done in bad faith or was deliberate and in contumacious disregard of the court’s authority.9 Appellate courts do not hesitate to reverse and remand for noncompliance with these requirements. Substantive misconduct is and should be subject to less tolerance before dismissal with prejudice is warranted. Lying about facts central to the case, including the nature and extent of one’s own injuries, simply cannot be tolerated and, frequently, cannot be remedied by any lesser sanction than dismissal with prejudice." Cases: administrative misconduct, judicial misconduct issues circumventing TITLE 42 SECTIONS 666 AND 654, 657 COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION CITATION FROM THE FEDERAL STATUTE OF THE US CODE § 657. Distribution of collected support 50 STATE TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT PROCESS http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/child-support-process-administrative-vs-judicial.aspx Child support orders can be established by the courts or by an administrative entity. In the administrative process, the state child support agency, also referred to as the IV-D agency, establishes the support order, usually without a hearing. In the judicial process, the court sets the order. Many states use a hybrid, or quasi-judicial process, which incorporates some judicial elements mixed with administrative processes. For example, many states may use an administrative forum, such as an attorney general’s office, but may incorporate a judicial element, such as an attorney. The three elements that determine where a process falls on the administrative/judicial continuum are 1) the forum used, 2) presiding officer, and 3) attorney involvement. The forum used simply means where the child support order is processed. Forums can include a courtroom, an administrative office of the court, the offices of an executive branch division such as the office of administrative hearings or attorney general’s office, the IV-D umbrella agency, or the IV-D agency itself. The presiding officer is the person who is in charge of supervising and running the process. Attorney involvement refers to whether or not an attorney represents the IV-D agency during the process. A state with a highly judicial process is one in which the forum used is a courtroom, the presiding officer is a judge, and the IV-D agency is represented by an attorney. States may be quasi-judicial, which means that the forum used may be a courtroom, but instead of a judge presiding, it may be a hearing officer who oversees the process. It is difficult to categorize states as fully judicial or fully administrative as the process differs depending on the type of order being processed. For example, there may be different processes for contested (challenged) and uncontested orders. Cases 2002-DR-050423-1 SHAW, SHEILA J 03/0912002 VS, COLEMAN, Family JIMMY L Income Deduction 0 Closed - Non SRS 2002-DR-006249-0 SHAW, SHEILA J 04124/2002 Paternity vs. GONZALEZ, Div 38 Closed - SRS CARLOS A Kest, Sally D M SHAW, SHEILA 08/29/2005 Paternity DOR JOCELYN VS. Div42 Re-Closed GONZALEZ, Evans, Robert M CARLOS ALBERTO SHAW, SHEILA 01/06/2010 Child Support DOR JOCELYN Div 42 Reopened Other KARENA vs. Evans, Robert M WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN SHAW, SHEILA 04112/2011 Domestic Violence w JOCELYN VS. Div 44 Closed - SRS WILLIAMS, JARRID Jordan, John E DESHAUN 2005-DR-014270-0 2010-DR-000170-0 2011-0R-006367-0 CIRCUMVENTING COMPLAINTS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND ENFORCEMENT UNDER (1) CIVIL ACTIONS BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SEC. 2000e-6. [Section 707] (a) Complaint... (2) STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CF OPERATING PROCEDURE CHILDREN AND FAMILIES NO. 180-4 TALLAHASSEE, October 29, 2007 Inspector General MANDATORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL (3) The following is an abstract from the Administration for Children and Families' website and the Administration for Child Support Enforcement, both of which publish all statutory guidelines for the collection of child support and payments thereof to the recipient. collection and distribution of child support payments Within this site it is defined as follows Frequently Asked Questions about Child Support Collection/Distribution For answers to questions about your own case, you need to check with your local or state child support office. State CSE agency telephone numbers and addresses are at (English):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ directories/ext/IVd_list.cfm (Spanish):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ directories/ext/Espanol_IVd_ list.cfm State CSE agency web site links are on our web site at the following location: http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/ programs/cse/extinf.htm#exta The following general information may be helpful: If the state collects more in a month than is to be paid to the family for their current and past due support, the rest of the money can be used to repay the state and federal governments for cash assistance * AFDC or TANF * that a family received. Also, child support agencies can recover all or part of the costs of their services from people who are not in a cash assistance program. These can include the cost of legal work done by agency attorneys or the costs of locating a parent, for example. The money may be deducted from the child support payment, or it may be collected from the noncustodial parent. For more information on changes in the law and how they may affect you, as well as the cost recovery practices of your State, you should contact your State child support enforcement agency. atty general complaint sent regarding misconduct( SAME ATTORNEY SAME FIRM WITH KNOWLEDGE OF PRIOR CASES-http://www.avvo.com/attorneys/32803-fl-ana-tangelrodriguez-1255736.html)/Duty to Report Lawyer Misconduct--Duty to Supervise--Responsibilities of Members of Law Firm Management Committees; These statutes include: Section 210401 of the Violence... Fw: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw Me to misconductcontact@floridadjqc.com & 9 moreSent Sheila Jocelyn Shaw http://professsorshaw.blogspot.com/ --- On Thu, 4/28/16, Sheila Shaw wrote: > From: Sheila Shaw > Subject: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw: prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct > To: ovw.info@usdoj.gov > Date: Thursday, April 28, 2016, 3:02 PM > --- On Thu, 4/28/16, Sheila Shaw > > wrote: > > > From: Sheila Shaw > > Subject: prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct > > To: contact@nwc.org > > Cc: "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "Misconduct president" , > "police misconduct" , > "police misconduct" , > "police misconduct" > > Date: Thursday, April 28, 2016, 2:54 PM > > > > > > VAWA REPORT REGARDING NOT ONLY ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT IN > CHILD > > CUSTODY MODIFICATION > > Intentionally omitted criminal nonsupport, offensive > > behaviour, professional misconduct and ethnic > biasedness, > > child exploitation and institutional racism > > Title 42 section 42 1983, 14141 attorney prosecutorial > child > > custody exploitation including false statements never > heard > > throughout case trial activity, false statements to > commence > > proceedings > > > > > > Case Type: > > Paternity > > Date Filed: > > 4/24/2002 > > Location: > > Div 38 > > UCN: > > 482002DR006249A001OX > > Judge: > > Patricia A Doherty > > Status: > > Closed - SRS > > Date Description Pages Doc > > Request > > Doc > > 7/10/2013 Letter 12 > > 3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address 1 > > > > > 1/1/2007 Case Reassigned to Division > > > > > 2/11/2005 Notice > > 11/10/2004 Final Order of Dismissal After > Hearing > > > > 11/10/2004 Final Order of Dismissal After > Hearing > > > > 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Smith, > Maura T > > > > 9/24/2004 Court Minutes > > 9/24/2004 Affidavit > > 9/13/2004 Pluries Summons Unserved > > > > > 7/28/2004 Pluries Summons Served > > > > > 7/27/2004 Notice of Hearing > > > 7/16/2004 Motion to Dismiss > > > 7/14/2004 Notice of Unavailability > > > > > 7/14/2004 Notice Appearance of Counsel > > > > > 7/1/2004 Affidavit of Lost/Destroyed Instrument > > > > 7/1/2004 Pluries Summons Issued > > > > > 4/16/2004 Pluries Summons Issued > > > > > 1/6/2004 Returned Mail > > 12/26/2003 Certificate of Mailing > > > > 12/26/2003 Affidavit > > 12/26/2003 Notice of Action Issued > > > > > 10/13/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved > > > > > 9/12/2003 Pluries Summons Issued > > > > > 9/3/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved > > > > 9/3/2003 Affidavit > > 9/3/2003 Motion > > 9/3/2003 Motion for Default > > > 9/3/2003 Affidavit > > 9/3/2003 Motion > > 9/3/2003 Motion for Default > > > 8/4/2003 Pluries Summons Issued > > > > > 7/31/2003 Request for Admissions > > > > > 6/9/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved > > > > 5/21/2003 Pluries Summons Issued > > > > > 5/1/2003 Third Party Summons > > > 2/11/2003 Pluries Summons Issued > > > > > 12/26/2002 Pluries Summons Served > > > > 11/8/2002 Pluries Summons Issued > > > > > 9/24/2002 Pluries Summons Unserved > > > > > 8/30/2002 Pluries Summons Issued > > > > > 7/29/2002 Summons Returned > > > 7/3/2002 Alias Summons Issued > > > 5/15/2002 Summons Returned > > > 4/24/2002 Summons Issued > > 4/24/2002 Affidavit of Non Military Service > > > > > 4/24/2002 Request for Admissions > > > > > 4/24/2002 Affidavit of Need > > > 4/24/2002 Certificate of Compliance > > > > > 4/24/2002 Financial Affidavit > > > 4/24/2002 Civil Cover Sheet > > > 4/24/2002 Petition > > 4/24/2002 Initial Judge Assigned > > > > Case Type: > > Paternity DOR > > Date Filed: > > 8/29/2005 > > Location: > > Div 42 > > UCN: > > 482005DR014270A001OX > > Judge: > > Heather P Rodriguez > > Status: > > Re-Closed > > Citation Number: > > Date Description Pages Doc > > Request > > Doc > > 3/3/2016 Returned Mail 3 > > 2/11/2016 Order Denying 2 > > 2/11/2016 Order Denying 2 > > 4/14/2015 Motion to Vacate 10 > > > 4/14/2015 Notice 3 > > 7/3/2013 Letter 5 > > 3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address 1 > > > > > 8/7/2012 Letter 11 > > 5/15/2012 Order Denying 1 > > 5/7/2012 Birth Certificate 1 > > > 5/7/2012 Motion 107 > > 5/7/2012 Civil Cover Sheet 2 > > > 4/2/2012 Notice of Change of Address 1 > > > > > 4/2/2012 Motion 74 > > 12/5/2011 Letter 3 > > 11/14/2011 Notice of Change of Address 1 > > > > 9/19/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & > Order > > 2 > > 9/14/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 > > > > 9/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 > > > > 9/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 > > > > 4/6/2011 Returned Mail 2 > > 3/30/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & > Order > > 3 > > 3/28/2011 Child Support Information Sheet > 1 > > > > 3/28/2011 Certified Notice of Delinquent > Support > > 1 > > 3/28/2011 Notice to Depository 1 > > > > > 3/28/2011 Supplemental Financial Statement > 1 > > > > 3/28/2011 Court Minutes 1 > > 3/28/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George > > > > > 3/22/2011 Returned Mail 2 > > 3/11/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment 1 > > > > 2/24/2011 Notice of Change of Address 1 > > > > > 2/24/2011 Memorandum 7 > > 2/24/2011 Copy/Copies 6 > > 2/23/2011 Answer 6 > > 2/18/2011 Alias Summons Returned Served > 5 > > > > 2/17/2011 Final Order 1 > > 2/14/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George > > > > > 1/14/2011 Returned Mail 2 > > 1/4/2011 Notice of Hearing 1 > > > 1/4/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment 1 > > > > > 11/29/2010 Notice of Change of Address 1 > > > > 10/22/2010 Order for Income Deduction 1 > > > > > 10/22/2010 Report/Recommendation and Final > Judgment > > 4 > > 10/19/2010 Court Minutes 1 > > > 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) 2 > > 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) 2 > > 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet > 2 > > > > 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet > 1 > > > > 10/19/2010 HEARING - Petition/Motion > > > > > 10/8/2010 Returned Mail 2 > > 9/20/2010 Order for Non Jury Trial 1 > > > > > 9/17/2010 Notice for Trial 1 > > > 8/12/2010 Response 2 > > 6/14/2010 Alias Summons Issued 4 > > > > > 4/9/2010 Summons Returned Unserved 5 > > > > > 12/17/2009 Summons Issued 4 > > > 12/17/2009 Certificate of Compliance 2 > > > > > 12/17/2009 Financial Affidavit 4 > > > > > 12/17/2009 Petition 4 > > 12/17/2009 Request for Admissions 1 > > > > > 11/1/2006 Notice of Change of Address > > > > > 9/28/2006 HRS673 to Bureau > > > 7/19/2006 Letter > > 7/19/2006 Letter > > 5/9/2006 Final Judgment > > 5/9/2006 Order for Income Deduction > > > > > 5/9/2006 Disposed by Non-Jury Trial > > > > > 5/9/2006 Final Judgment > > 5/8/2006 HRS673 to Bureau > > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, > Renee A > > > > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, > Renee A > > > > 4/28/2006 Affidavit > > 4/28/2006 Affidavit > > 4/28/2006 Court Minutes > > 3/29/2006 Order for Non Jury Trial > > > > > 3/29/2006 Notice of Hearing > > > 3/29/2006 Notice for Trial > > > 3/29/2006 Request to Produce > > > 3/28/2006 Request for Admissions > > > > > 3/28/2006 Notice of Filing HLA Tissue Typing > > > > > 2/9/2006 Notice > > 1/10/2006 HRS673 to Bureau > > > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, Renee > A > > > > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee > A > > > > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 1/5/2006 Court Minutes > > 1/5/2006 Financial Affidavit > > > 1/5/2006 Child Support Information Sheet > > > > 1/5/2006 Child Support Information Sheet > > > > 12/6/2005 Notice of Hearing > > > 12/6/2005 Order for Non Jury Trial > > > > > 12/6/2005 Request to Produce > > > 12/6/2005 Notice for Trial > > > 12/5/2005 Answer > > 10/31/2005 Summons Returned > > > 10/31/2005 Summons Returned > > > 10/27/2005 Answer Denying Allegations > > > > > 8/29/2005 Summons Issued > > 8/29/2005 Request for Admissions > > > > > 8/29/2005 Certificate of Compliance > > > > > 8/29/2005 Financial Affidavit > > > 8/29/2005 Notice of Social Security > > > > > 8/29/2005 Civil Cover Sheet > > > 8/29/2005 Petition > > 8/29/2005 Initial Judge Assigned > > > > > > > > > VOR (Viewable on Request) > > Certain case documents contain sensitive or personally > > identifiable information that must be manually > redacted > > before they are viewable by the general public. > Documents > > listed in the Docket Events section as VOR are public > > documents that require further redaction by Clerk > staff > > before they can be viewed. Follow the steps below to > request > > access to these documents: > > > > Check the Request Doc checkbox for the document > you > > wish to view. You may repeat this for other VOR > documents on > > the same case. > > Once all document requests have been made for > this > > case, click the Submit button. A confirmation screen > will > > display, where you will be asked to enter or confirm > your > > email address to finalize your request. > > You will receive an initial email notification > to > > confirm your request, followed by additional email > > notifications as requested documents become available. > The > > Clerk’s office makes every effort to complete these > > requests in a timely manner. > > > > For definitions of document types, please refer to our > > glossary. > > Hearings > > Date Hearing Time Location > Pages > > Doc > > 3/28/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 > AM > > > > 2/14/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 > AM > > > > 10/19/2010 Petition/Motion 1:00 PM > > > > > 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 8:00 AM > > 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 8:00 AM > > 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 8:00 AM > > 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A > 8:00 > > AM > > 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 8:00 AM > > 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 8:00 AM > > 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 8:00 AM > > 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A > 8:00 > > AM > > 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A > 9:00 > > AM > > 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 9:00 AM > > 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 9:00 AM > > 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 9:00 AM > > 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A > 9:00 > > AM > > 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 9:00 AM > > 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 9:00 AM > > 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 9:00 AM > > > > > > > > Case Narrative > > > > "an act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere > with > > the orderly administration of justice, or to impair > the > > dignity of the court or respect for its authority. > There are > > two kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, > 128. > > direct contempt openly and in the presence of the > court, > > resists the power of the court, 102 A. 400, 406; and > > consequential, or constructive contempt results from > matters > > outside the court, such as failure to comply... MISUSE > OF > > OFFICE TO ENGAGE IN RACIAL PROFILING, FRAUD, AIDING > AND > > ABETTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT RECOVERY BY FALSE > ALLEGATIONS > > USED TO ABATE DEPARTMENTAL COLLECTION INTERVENTIONS ON > > BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT AND MOTHER TO CASES IN THE > FAMILY > > COURT, AND CHILD SUPPORT OCSE, AFFILIATED WITH FLORIDA > DCF > > DEPARTMENTAL RISS SYSTEM DATABASES ON FEBRUARY 4TH, > 2011 > > DURING WHICH TIME COURT DATES OR CONCURRENT > ENFORCEMENT > > ACTION WAS BEING UNDERGONE. CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. > 180-4 > > MANDATORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF > INSPECTOR > > GENERA #Employee Misconduct > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/03/7750844white-collar-crime-victim.html, > > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/12/you-cannot-use-information-available-to.html > > OIG Investigative and Law Enforcement Authority The > > Office of Inspector General (OIG), U.S. Department of > > Agriculture (USDA), was administratively established by > the > > Secretary of Agriculture in 1962 following a major > criminal > > fraud scandal affecting several agencies within USDA. > OIG > > was later legislatively established by Congress under > the > > Inspector General Act of 1978 (Public Law [P.L.] > 95-452), as > > amended. Pursuant to the Inspector General Act of 1978 > and > > Section 1337 of the Agriculture and Food Act of 1981 > (P.L. > > 97-98), OIG Investigations is the law enforcement arm > of the > > Department, with Department-wide investigative > jurisdiction. > > OIG Special Agents conduct investigations of > significant > > criminal activities involving USDA programs, > operations, and > > personnel, and are authorized to make arrests, execute > > warrants, and carry firearms. The types of > investigations > > conducted by OIG Special Agents involve criminal > activities > > such as frauds in subsidy, price support, benefits, > and > > insurance programs; significant thefts of Government > > property or funds; bribery; extortion; smuggling; and > > assaults on employees. Investigations involving > criminal > > activity that affects the health and safety of the > public, > > such as meat packers who knowingly sell hazardous food > > products and individuals who tamper with food regulated > by > > USDA, are also high-profile investigative priorities. > In > > addition, OIG Special Agents are poised to provide > emergency > > law enforcement response to USDA declared emergencies > and > > suspected incidents of terrorism affecting USDA > regulated > > industries, as well as USDA programs, operations, > personnel, > > and installations, in coordination with Federal, State, > and > > local law enforcement agencies, as appropriate. The > > enactment of the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food > and > > Drug Administration, and Related Agencies > Appropriations Act > > of 1996 (P.L. 104-37) authorized OIG to receive funds > and > > property through criminal and civil Federal forfeiture > > proceedings, and through equitable sharing of > forfeited > > funds and property controlled by the U.S. Department > of > > Justice. Forfeiture proceeds have severe restrictions > > mandated by statutes and U.S. Department of Justice > policy > > as to how they are used. Forfeiture funds cannot be > used in > > lieu of the OIG's regular appropriations. False CPI, > > PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida > > Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do > > concerning false reporting for children and Section > 415.111, > > F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. RE: CF > > OPERATING PROCEDURE (NO. 180-4 https://drive.google.com/folder/d/0B84_tgjFbXNLcUpfaDBSRHBSZDQ/editATORY > > REPORTING REQUIiREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR > > GENERAL Clearly outlines employee fraud and misconduct > > within the scope of cause f action by the Office of > the > > Inspector General within the Florida Departmentof > Children. > > § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE > AND > > FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 > 787.03 > > False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. > § > > 775.085) (complaint ACAP THE FLORIDA BAR INQUIRY > COMPLAINT > > FORM http://goo.gl/h9wjQr) http://www.dcf.state.fl.us/admin/ig/content/AR2013-14.pdf > > Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what > the > > department has to do concerning false reporting for > children > > and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses wdith false > reporting > > for adults. https://oig.justice.gov/hotline/contact-doj.htm cc: > > letter to OIG FL DCF Keith Parks Resending Complaint > > Attached Department form (complaint ACAP THE FLORIDA > BAR > > INQUIRY COMPLAINT FORM Fw: ATTN KEITH PARKS CONTINUING > > INSPECTOR GENERAL MANDATORY REPORTING TO IG OFFICE, > > MISCONDUCT COMPLAINT Aug 10, 2015, 12:19 PM § > 112.313(8), > > Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW > 2003 > > FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 False complaint > Fwd: > > ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § 775.085 Enhances > penalty > > for crimes evidencing "prejudice based on the race, > color, > > ancestry, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, > national > > origin, mental or physical disability, or advanced age > of > > the victim. The duty to report misconduct is one of > the > > ethical duties imposed on attorneys in the United > States by > > the rules governing professional responsibility http://www.iape.org/index.php http://definitions.uslegal. > com/w/willful-professional- > > misconduct/ Rule 8.3—Reporting Professional > Misconduct (a) > > A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a > > violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that > raises a > > substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, > > trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other > respects, > > shall inform the appropriate professional authority. > (b) A > > lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation > of > > applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a > > substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for > office > > shall inform the appropriate authority. (c) This rule > does > > not require disclosure of information otherwise > protected by > > Rule 1.6 or other law TITLE 42 SECTIONS 666 AND 654, > 657 > > COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION CITATION FROM THE FEDERAL > > STATUTE OF THE US CODE § 657. Distribution of > collected > > support 50 STATE T Me to infopitt@womenslawproject.org & 1 moreSent --- On Thu, 4/28/16, Sheila Shaw wrote: > From: Sheila Shaw > Subject: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw: prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct > To: local@tampabay.com > Date: Thursday, April 28, 2016, 3:26 PM > > > > VAWA REPORT REGARDING NOT ONLY ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT IN CHILD > CUSTODY MODIFICATION > Intentionally omitted criminal nonsupport, offensive > behaviour, professional misconduct and ethnic biasedness, > child exploitation and institutional racism > Title 42 section 42 1983, 14141 attorney prosecutorial child > chustody exploitation including false statements never heard > throughout case trial activity, false statements to commence > proceedings > > > Case Type: > Paternity > Date Filed: > 4/24/2002 > Location: > Div 38 > UCN: > 482002DR006249A001OX > Judge: > Patricia A Doherty > Status: > Closed - SRS > Date Description Pages Doc Request > Doc > 7/10/2013 Letter 12 > 3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address > 1 > 1/1/2007 Case Reassigned to Division > 2/11/2005 Notice > 11/10/2004 Final Order of Dismissal After > Hearing > 11/10/2004 Final Order of Dismissal After > Hearing > 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Smith, Maura > T > 9/24/2004 Court Minutes > 9/24/2004 Affidavit > 9/13/2004 Pluries Summons Unserved > 7/28/2004 Pluries Summons Served > 7/27/2004 Notice of Hearing > 7/16/2004 Motion to Dismiss > 7/14/2004 Notice of Unavailability > 7/14/2004 Notice Appearance of Counsel > 7/1/2004 Affidavit of Lost/Destroyed Instrument > > 7/1/2004 Pluries Summons Issued > 4/16/2004 Pluries Summons Issued > 1/6/2004 Returned Mail > 12/26/2003 Certificate of Mailing > 12/26/2003 Affidavit > 12/26/2003 Notice of Action Issued > 10/13/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved > 9/12/2003 Pluries Summons Issued > 9/3/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved > 9/3/2003 Affidavit > 9/3/2003 Motion > 9/3/2003 Motion for Default > 9/3/2003 Affidavit > 9/3/2003 Motion > 9/3/2003 Motion for Default > 8/4/2003 Pluries Summons Issued > 7/31/2003 Request for Admissions > 6/9/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved > 5/21/2003 Pluries Summons Issued > 5/1/2003 Third Party Summons > 2/11/2003 Pluries Summons Issued > 12/26/2002 Pluries Summons Served > 11/8/2002 Pluries Summons Issued > 9/24/2002 Pluries Summons Unserved > 8/30/2002 Pluries Summons Issued > 7/29/2002 Summons Returned > 7/3/2002 Alias Summons Issued > 5/15/2002 Summons Returned > 4/24/2002 Summons Issued > 4/24/2002 Affidavit of Non Military Service > > 4/24/2002 Request for Admissions > 4/24/2002 Affidavit of Need > 4/24/2002 Certificate of Compliance > 4/24/2002 Financial Affidavit > 4/24/2002 Civil Cover Sheet > 4/24/2002 Petition > 4/24/2002 Initial Judge Assigned > > Case Type: > Paternity DOR > Date Filed: > 8/29/2005 > Location: > Div 42 > UCN: > 482005DR014270A001OX > Judge: > Heather P Rodriguez > Status: > Re-Closed > Citation Number: > Date Description Pages Doc Request > Doc > 3/3/2016 Returned Mail 3 > 2/11/2016 Order Denying 2 > 2/11/2016 Order Denying 2 > 4/14/2015 Motion to Vacate 10 > 4/14/2015 Notice 3 > 7/3/2013 Letter 5 > 3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address > 1 > 8/7/2012 Letter 11 > 5/15/2012 Order Denying 1 > 5/7/2012 Birth Certificate 1 > 5/7/2012 Motion 107 > 5/7/2012 Civil Cover Sheet 2 > 4/2/2012 Notice of Change of Address > 1 > 4/2/2012 Motion 74 > 12/5/2011 Letter 3 > 11/14/2011 Notice of Change of Address > 1 > 9/19/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & > Order 2 > 9/14/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus > 9 > 9/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus > 9 > 9/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus > 9 > 4/6/2011 Returned Mail 2 > 3/30/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & > Order 3 > 3/28/2011 Child Support Information Sheet > 1 > 3/28/2011 Certified Notice of Delinquent Support > 1 > 3/28/2011 Notice to Depository > 1 > 3/28/2011 Supplemental Financial Statement > 1 > 3/28/2011 Court Minutes 1 > 3/28/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George > > 3/22/2011 Returned Mail 2 > 3/11/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment > 1 > 2/24/2011 Notice of Change of Address > 1 > 2/24/2011 Memorandum 7 > 2/24/2011 Copy/Copies 6 > 2/23/2011 Answer 6 > 2/18/2011 Alias Summons Returned Served > 5 > 2/17/2011 Final Order 1 > 2/14/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George > > 1/14/2011 Returned Mail 2 > 1/4/2011 Notice of Hearing 1 > 1/4/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment > 1 > 11/29/2010 Notice of Change of Address > 1 > 10/22/2010 Order for Income Deduction > 1 > 10/22/2010 Report/Recommendation and Final > Judgment 4 > 10/19/2010 Court Minutes 1 > 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) 2 > 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) 2 > 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet > 2 > 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet > 1 > 10/19/2010 HEARING - Petition/Motion > 10/8/2010 Returned Mail 2 > 9/20/2010 Order for Non Jury Trial > 1 > 9/17/2010 Notice for Trial 1 > 8/12/2010 Response 2 > 6/14/2010 Alias Summons Issued > 4 > 4/9/2010 Summons Returned Unserved > 5 > 12/17/2009 Summons Issued 4 > 12/17/2009 Certificate of Compliance > 2 > 12/17/2009 Financial Affidavit > 4 > 12/17/2009 Petition 4 > 12/17/2009 Request for Admissions > 1 > 11/1/2006 Notice of Change of Address > 9/28/2006 HRS673 to Bureau > 7/19/2006 Letter > 7/19/2006 Letter > 5/9/2006 Final Judgment > 5/9/2006 Order for Income Deduction > 5/9/2006 Disposed by Non-Jury Trial > 5/9/2006 Final Judgment > 5/8/2006 HRS673 to Bureau > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee > A > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, Renee > A > 4/28/2006 Affidavit > 4/28/2006 Affidavit > 4/28/2006 Court Minutes > 3/29/2006 Order for Non Jury Trial > 3/29/2006 Notice of Hearing > 3/29/2006 Notice for Trial > 3/29/2006 Request to Produce > 3/28/2006 Request for Admissions > 3/28/2006 Notice of Filing HLA Tissue Typing > > 2/9/2006 Notice > 1/10/2006 HRS673 to Bureau > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, Renee > A > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee > A > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 1/5/2006 Court Minutes > 1/5/2006 Financial Affidavit > 1/5/2006 Child Support Information Sheet > > 1/5/2006 Child Support Information Sheet > > 12/6/2005 Notice of Hearing > 12/6/2005 Order for Non Jury Trial > 12/6/2005 Request to Produce > 12/6/2005 Notice for Trial > 12/5/2005 Answer > 10/31/2005 Summons Returned > 10/31/2005 Summons Returned > 10/27/2005 Answer Denying Allegations > 8/29/2005 Summons Issued > 8/29/2005 Request for Admissions > 8/29/2005 Certificate of Compliance > 8/29/2005 Financial Affidavit > 8/29/2005 Notice of Social Security > 8/29/2005 Civil Cover Sheet > 8/29/2005 Petition > 8/29/2005 Initial Judge Assigned > > > VOR (Viewable on Request) > Certain case documents contain sensitive or personally > identifiable information that must be manually redacted > before they are viewable by the general public. Documents > listed in the Docket Events section as VOR are public > documents that require further redaction by Clerk staff > before they can be viewed. Follow the steps below to request > access to these documents: > > Check the Request Doc checkbox for the > document you wish to view. You may repeat this for other VOR > documents on the same case. > Once all document requests have been made for > this case, click the Submit button. A confirmation screen > will display, where you will be asked to enter or confirm > your email address to finalize your request. > You will receive an initial email notification > to confirm your request, followed by additional email > notifications as requested documents become available. The > Clerk’s office makes every effort to complete these > requests in a timely manner. > > For definitions of document types, please refer to our > glossary. > Hearings > Date Hearing Time Location > Pages Doc > 3/28/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 AM > > 2/14/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 AM > > 10/19/2010 Petition/Motion 1:00 PM > > 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated 8:00 AM > 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated 8:00 AM > 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated 8:00 AM > 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 8:00 > AM > 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated 8:00 AM > 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated 8:00 AM > 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated 8:00 AM > 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 8:00 > AM > 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 9:00 > AM > 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated 9:00 AM > 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated 9:00 AM > 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated 9:00 AM > 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 9:00 > AM > 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated 9:00 AM > 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated 9:00 AM > 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated 9:00 AM > > > Cause of Action > > Fraud > Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141: makes it unlawful for state > or local law enforcement agencies to allow officers to > engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives > persons of rights protected by the Constitution or laws of > the United States. This law is commonly referred to as the > Police Misconduct Statute. > > > the exintimate partner and public officer employee > misconduct > BUSINESS TORT RELATED-ADVERSARIAL TORTS OR MATERNAL INJURIES > WITH INTENT > > > > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer_29.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/any-police-department-receiving-federal.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/family-violence-prevention-act-victim.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/false-cpi-personal-torts-tort-of-fraud.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/jarrid-williams-probation-dc-346801.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/201 > Federal laws > Federal law 42 U.S.C. § 5772 & 42 U.S.C. § 5780 > Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5772) defines a "missing child" as > "any individual less than 18 years of age whose whereabouts > are unknown to such individual"s legal custodian." > RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 > False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, > Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do > concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, > F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. > > > 827.03 Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; > penalties.— > > intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result > in physical or mental injury to > a child; or > (c) Active encouragement of any person to commit an act that > results or could reasonably be > expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child. > A person who knowingly or willfully abuses a child without > causing great bodily harm, > > > > http://definitions.uslegal/ com/w/willful-professional- > misconduct > > > > PRINCIPAL CASES - HOME STATE ORIGIN INDIANA > > REGISTER OF ACTIONS CASE NO. 1993-CF-008458-AO cases: > OC9901243 PA cases OC9901243 and 02-83719047104532 PA Cause > number 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL Narrative > > "an act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere with > the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the > dignity of the court or respect for its authority. There are > two kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, 128. > direct contempt openly and in the presence of the court, > resists the power of the court, 102 A. 400, 406; and > consequential, or constructive contempt results from matters > outside the court, such as failure to comply... MISUSE OF > OFFICE TO ENGAGE IN RACIAL PROFILING, FRAUD, AIDING AND > ABETTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT RECOVERY BY FALSE ALLEGATIONS > USED TO ABATE DEPARTMENTAL COLLECTION INTERVENTIONS ON > BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT AND MOTHER TO CASES IN THE FAMILY > COURT, AND CHILD SUPPORT OCSE, AFFILIATED WITH FLORIDA DCF > DEPARTMENTAL RISS SYSTEM DATABASES ON FEBRUARY 4TH, 2011 > DURING WHICH TIME COURT DATES OR CONCURRENT ENFORCEMENT > ACTION WAS BEING UNDERGONE. CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 > MANDATORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR > GENERA #Employee Misconduct http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/03/7750844white-collar-crime-victim.html, > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/12/you-cannot-use-information-available-to.html > OIG Investigative and Law Enforcement Authority The > Office of Inspector General (OIG), U.S. Department of > Agriculture (USDA), was administratively established by the > Secretary of Agriculture in 1962 following a major criminal > fraud scandal affecting several agencies within USDA. OIG > was later legislatively established by Congress under the > Inspector General Act of 1978 (Public Law [P.L.] 95-452), as > amended. Pursuant to the Inspector General Act of 1978 and > Section 1337 of the Agriculture and Food Act of 1981 (P.L. > 97-98), OIG Investigations is the law enforcement arm of the > Department, with Department-wide investigative jurisdiction. > OIG Special Agents conduct investigations of significant > criminal activities involving USDA programs, operations, and > personnel, and are authorized to make arrests, execute > warrants, and carry firearms. The types of investigations > conducted by OIG Special Agents involve criminal activities > such as frauds in subsidy, price support, benefits, and > insurance programs; significant thefts of Government > property or funds; bribery; extortion; smuggling; and > assaults on employees. Investigations involving criminal > activity that affects the health and safety of the public, > such as meat packers who knowingly sell hazardous food > products and individuals who tamper with food regulated by > USDA, are also high-profile investigative priorities. In > addition, OIG Special Agents are poised to provide emergency > law enforcement response to USDA declared emergencies and > suspected incidents of terrorism affecting USDA regulated > industries, as well as USDA programs, operations, personnel, > and installations, in coordination with Federal, State, and > local law enforcement agencies, as appropriate. The > enactment of the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and > Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act > of 1996 (P.L. 104-37) authorized OIG to receive funds and > property through criminal and civil Federal forfeiture > proceedings, and through equitable sharing of forfeited > funds and property controlled by the U.S. Department of > Justice. Forfeiture proceeds have severe restrictions > mandated by statutes and U.S. Department of Justice policy > as to how they are used. Forfeiture funds cannot be used in > lieu of the OIG's regular appropriations. False CPI, > PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida > Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do > concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, > F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. RE: CF > OPERATING PROCEDURE (NO. 180-4 https://drive.google.com/folder/d/0B84_tgjFbXNLcUpfaDBSRHBSZDQ/editATORY > REPORTING REQUIiREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR > GENERAL Clearly outlines employee fraud and misconduct > within the scope of cause f action by the Office of the > Inspector General within the Florida Departmentof Children. > § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND > FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 > False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § > 775.085) (complaint ACAP THE FLORIDA BAR INQUIRY COMPLAINT > FORM http://goo.gl/h9wjQr) http://www.dcf.state.fl.us/admin/ig/content/AR2013-14.pdf > Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the > department has to do concerning false reporting for children > and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses wdith false reporting > for adults. https://oig.justice.gov/hotline/contact-doj.htm cc: > letter to OIG FL DCF Keith Parks Resending Complaint > Attached Department form (complaint ACAP THE FLORIDA BAR > INQUIRY COMPLAINT FORM Fw: ATTN KEITH PARKS CONTINUING > INSPECTOR GENERAL MANDATORY REPORTING TO IG OFFICE, > MISCONDUCT COMPLAINT Aug 10, 2015, 12:19 PM § 112.313(8), > Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW 2003 > FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 False complaint Fwd: > ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § 775.085 Enhances penalty > for crimes evidencing "prejudice based on the race, color, > ancestry, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, national > origin, mental or physical disability, or advanced age of > the victim. The duty to report misconduct is one of the > ethical duties imposed on attorneys in the United States by > the rules governing professional responsibility http://www.iape.org/index.php http://definitions.uslegal. com/w/willful-professional- > misconduct/ Rule 8.3—Reporting Professional Misconduct (a) > A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a > violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a > substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, > trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, > shall inform the appropriate professional authority. (b) A > lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation of > applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a > substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for office > shall inform the appropriate authority. (c) This rule does > not require disclosure of information otherwise protected by > Rule 1.6 or other law TITLE 42 SECTIONS 666 AND 654, 657 > COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION CITATION FROM THE FEDERAL > STATUTE OF THE US CODE § 657. Distribution of collected > support 50 STATE TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT PROCESS http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/child-support-process-administrative-vs-judicial.aspx > Child support orders can be established by the courts or > by an administrative entity. Statutes Pertaining to > Violations of Civil Rights Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Every > person who, under color or any statute, ordinance, > regulation, custom or usage, of any State of Territory, > subjects ... any citizen of the United States ... to the > deprivation of any rights, privileges or immunities secured > by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party > injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper > proceeding for redress. Felony to Interfere With Civil > Rights Title 42 U.S.C § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with > civil rights (1) Preventing officer from performing duty. If > two or more persons ... conspire to prevent ... any person > from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of > confidence under the United States, or from discharging any > duties thereof; or to injure him in his person or property > on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his > office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or > to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, > or impede him in the discharge of his official duties. (2) > Obstructing justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror. > If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to > deter, by force, intimidation, or threat, any party or > witness in any court of the United States from attending > such court, or from testifying to any matter pending > therein, freely, fully, and truthfully, or to injure such > party or witness in his person or property on account of his > having so attended or testified, or to influence the > verdict, presentment, or indictment of any grand or petit > juror in any such court, or to injure such juror in his > person or property on account of any verdict, presentment, > or indictment lawfully assented to by him, or of his being > or having been such juror; or if two or more persons > conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, > obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of > justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to > any citizen the equal protection of the law, or to injure > him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to > enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to > the equal protection of the laws; (3) Depriving persons of > rights or privileges. If two or more persons in any State or > Territory conspire, or go in disguise on the highway or on > the premises of another, for the purpose of depriving, > either directly or indirectly, any person or class of > persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal > privileges and immunities under the laws, or for the purpose > of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of > any State or Territory from giving or securing to all > persons within such State or Territory the equal protection > of the laws; ... or to injure any citizen in person or > property on account of such support or advocacy; in any case > of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more > persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in > furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby > another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of > having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of > the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have > an action for the recovery of damages, occasioned by such > injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the > conspirators. Title 42 U.S.C. § 1985 pertains to a > conspiracy to interfere with civil rights, (1) to prevent an > officer from performing a duty; (2) obstructing justice; > intimidating party, witness, or juror; (3) or depriving > persons of rights or privileges. Title 42 U.S.C. § 1986. > Action for neglect to prevent conspiracy Every person who, > having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be > done, and mentioned in the preceding section [42 USCS § > 1985], are about to be committed, and having power to > prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, > neglects or refuses to do so, if such wrongful act be > committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his > legal representatives, for all damages caused by such > wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence > could have prevented; And such damages may be recovered in > an action on the case; and any number of persons guilty of > such wrongful neglect or refusal may be joined as defendants > in the action, and if the death of any party be caused by > any such wrongful act and neglect, the legal representatives > of the deceased shall have such action therefore, and may > recover not exceeding five thousand dollars damages therein, > for the benefit of the widow of the deceased, if there be > one, and if there be no widow, then for the benefit of the > next of kin of the deceased. But no action under the > provisions of this section shall be sustained which is not > commenced within one year after the cause of action has > accrued. Keith Parks, Inspector General 1317 Winewood Blvd., > Bldg. 5, Second Floor Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700 Phone: > (850) 488-1225 Fax: (850) 488-1428 Maxine McGregor Client > Relations Coordinator Email: Maxine_McGregor@dcf.state.fl.us > Address: 400 West Robinson Street Hurston Bldg., South > Tower, S S-1106 Orlando Florida 32801 United States Phone > Number: 407-317-7000 x7047 ACCESS Florida Gretchen Perry > Client Relations Coordinator Address: 400 West Robinson > Street Hurston Bldg., South Tower, S S-1106 Orlando Florida > 32801 United States Phone Number: 407-317-7000 x7045 1) CPS > may only place founded reports on the state's central > registry of child abuse and neglect. (In some states, > unfounded reports are placed on the central registry, which > not only causes harm to innocent people but is also a > violation of due process.) 2) Caseworkers must inform > families if a report is anonymous. (There is a difference > between anonymous and confidential—reporters’ names > should be kept confidential, but anonymous reports are not > as reliable as those made by known reporters.) 3) Parents > must be allowed to select an unrelated adult to be present > during interviews of their children. 4) Investigations must > cease immediately upon discovery that the allegations are > false. Continuing the investigation process despite proof of > innocence only traumatizes the family and wastes state > resources. 5) Parents must have access to the records of > their investigations. HSLDA also continues to assist with > incorporating the following two federal CAPTA requirements > into state codes: 1) Requiring child protective services > workers to be trained in their duty to protect the statutory > and constitutional rights of those they are investigating. > 2) Requiring child protective services personnel to advise > individuals subject to a child abuse and neglect > investigation of the complaint or allegation made against > them. Notes 1. Children’s Bureau. (2003). Child > Maltreatment. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. > Retrieved > fromhttp://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm03/index.htm. > 2. Calabretta v. Floyd, 189 F.3d 808 (1999). Claudia > Hernandez 400 W. Robinson St. (Hurston South Tower) Ste. # > S-509, Orlando, FL 32801-1718 WHITE COLLAR CRIMES ABUSE OF > PROCESS PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT LAWYER MISCONDUCT JUDICIAL > MISCONDUCT Saturday, 12 December 2015 You cannot use > information available to you because of your job, but not > available to the public, for your personal benefit or for > the benefit of others. § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF > OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes > chapter 787 787.03 False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT > (Fla. Stat. § 775.085 Enhances penalty for crimes > evidencing "prejudice based on the race, color, ancestry, > ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, > mental or physical disability, or advanced age of the > victim. The duty to report misconduct is one of the ethical > duties imposed on attorneys in the United States by the > rules governing professional responsibility http://www.iape.org/index.php http://definitions.uslegal. com/w/willful-professional- > misconduct/ Rule 8.3—Reporting Professional Misconduct (a) > A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a > violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a > substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, > trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, > shall inform the appropriate professional authority. (b) A > lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation of > applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a > substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for office > shall inform the appropriate authority. (c) This rule does > not require disclosure of information otherwise protected by > Rule 1.6 or other law. http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309048893 Cases > 2005-DR-014270-O (Paternity) P I I Lead Attorneys Petitioner > SHAW, SHEILA J BARBARA FANCHER(LIMITED) JONES, Esquire > Retained 407-849-1133(W) Respondent GONZALEZ, CARLOS A > RUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire Retained 407-786-2889(W) > E & O C & O C DISPOSITIONS 11/10/ Final Order of > Dismissal After Hearing 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal > After Hearing 2004 OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS 01/01/ Case > Reassigned to Division 2007 Case Reassigned to Division|CASE > REASSIGNED TO JUDGE 38 02/11/ Notice 2005 Notice|NOTICE OF > CONCLUSION OF REPRESENTATION 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal > After Hearing 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing > 2004 Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing|FINAL ORDER OF > DISMISSAL AFTER HEARING RECORDED RELATED CASES - PRINCIPAL > JUDICIAL OR PROFESSION MISCONDUCT-FRAUD ON THE COURTS- > PERSONAL AND BUSINESS TORT RELATED-ADVERSARIAL TORTS OR > MATERNAL INJURIES WITH INTENT http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer_29.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/any-police-department-receiving-federal.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/family-violence-prevention-act-victim.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/false-cpi-personal-torts-tort-of-fraud.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/jarrid-williams-probation-dc-346801.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/201 > Federal laws Federal law 42 U.S.C. § 5772 & 42 > U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5772) defines a > "missing child" as "any individual less than 18 years of age > whose whereabouts are unknown to such individual"s legal > custodian." RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI, > PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida > Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do > concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, > F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. 827.03 > Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; > penalties.— intentional act that could reasonably be > expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child; > or (c) Active encouragement of any person to commit an act > that results or could reasonably be expected to result in > physical or mental injury to a child. A person who knowingly > or willfully abuses a child without causing great bodily > harm, http://definitions.uslegal. com/w/willful-professional- > misconduct PRINCIPAL CASES - HOME STATE ORIGIN INDIANA > REGISTER OF ACTIONS CASE NO. 1993-CF-008458-AO cases: > OC9901243 PA cases OC9901243 and 02-83719047104532 PA Cause > number 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL 2010-DP 1170 FL > INDIANA CASE NUMBERS Paternity case file no J18720 filed > 11-16-71/11-24-71 order date Shirley Ann Shaw/Claude R. > Jackson mariired December 31st, 1978 marriage license number > CDR-94-114 Shirley Ann Shaw Joseph Nikolaenko marriage ended > June 30, 1995 Buddmeeks Ctr Domestic case DCM-91-6993 1991 > marriage license number 02D01-9707-ML-001399 07/08/97 > married on 07/26/1997 DOB 04/21/46 Joseph Nikolaenko mother > Michlaina Nikolaenko 5012 Pacer Run Ft. Wayne, IN Gwedolyn > Ann Brown DOB 04/12/60 son Tyrese Dartanvan Brown father > Thomas Lewis Brown mother Mary Lee Spann 3054 Schele Ave Ft. > Wayne, IN Dorothy Jackson Claude Jackson married July 2, > 1983 Divorce petition 02C01-9110-D1-1313 CDR-91-1313 > "...Additionally, whether substantive or procedural > misconduct is the basis for the sanction, the trial court > must hold an evidentiary hearing before dismissing a case > with prejudice,8 and must make an express finding that the > conduct forming the basis for the dismissal was willful or > done in bad faith or was deliberate and in contumacious > disregard of the court’s authority.9 Appellate courts do > not hesitate to reverse and remand for noncompliance with > these requirements. Substantive misconduct is and should be > subject to less tolerance before dismissal with prejudice is > warranted. Lying about facts central to the case, including > the nature and extent of one’s own injuries, simply cannot > be tolerated and, frequently, cannot be remedied by any > lesser sanction than dismissal with prejudice." Cases: > administrative misconduct, judicial misconduct issues > circumventing TITLE 42 SECTIONS 666 AND 654, 657 COLLECTION > AND DISTRIBUTION CITATION FROM THE FEDERAL STATUTE OF THE US > CODE § 657. Distribution of collected support 50 STATE > TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT PROCESS http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/child-support-process-administrative-vs-judicial.aspx > Child support orders can be established by the courts or > by an administrative entity. In the administrative process, > the state child support agency, also referred to as the IV-D > agency, establishes the support order, usually without a > hearing. In the judicial process, the court sets the order. > Many states use a hybrid, or quasi-judicial process, which > incorporates some judicial elements mixed with > administrative processes. For example, many states may use > an administrative forum, such as an attorney general’s > office, but may incorporate a judicial element, such as an > attorney. The three elements that determine where a process > falls on the administrative/judicial continuum are 1) the > forum used, 2) presiding officer, and 3) attorney > involvement. The forum used simply means where the child > support order is processed. Forums can include a courtroom, > an administrative office of the court, the offices of an > executive branch division such as the office of > administrative hearings or attorney general’s office, the > IV-D umbrella agency, or the IV-D agency itself. The > presiding officer is the person who is in charge of > supervising and running the process. Attorney involvement > refers to whether or not an attorney represents the IV-D > agency during the process. A state with a highly judicial > process is one in which the forum used is a courtroom, the > presiding officer is a judge, and the IV-D agency is > represented by an attorney. States may be quasi-judicial, > which means that the forum used may be a courtroom, but > instead of a judge presiding, it may be a hearing officer > who oversees the process. It is difficult to categorize > states as fully judicial or fully administrative as the > process differs depending on the type of order being > processed. For example, there may be different processes for > contested (challenged) and uncontested orders. Cases > 2002-DR-050423-1 SHAW, SHEILA J 03/0912002 VS, COLEMAN, > Family JIMMY L Income Deduction 0 Closed - Non SRS > 2002-DR-006249-0 SHAW, SHEILA J 04124/2002 Paternity vs. > GONZALEZ, Div 38 Closed - SRS CARLOS A Kest, Sally D M SHAW, > SHEILA 08/29/2005 Paternity DOR JOCELYN VS. Div42 Re-Closed > GONZALEZ, Evans, Robert M CARLOS ALBERTO SHAW, SHEILA > 01/06/2010 Child Support DOR JOCELYN Div 42 Reopened Other > KARENA vs. Evans, Robert M WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN SHAW, > SHEILA 04112/2011 Domestic Violence w JOCELYN VS. Div 44 > Closed - SRS WILLIAMS, JARRID Jordan, John E DESHAUN > 2005-DR-014270-0 2010-DR-000170-0 2011-0R-006367-0 > CIRCUMVENTING COMPLAINTS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND > ENFORCEMENT UNDER (1) CIVIL ACTIONS BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL > SEC. 2000e-6. [Section 707] (a) Complaint... (2) STATE OF > FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CF OPERATING PROCEDURE CHILDREN AND > FAMILIES NO. 180-4 TALLAHASSEE, October 29, 2007 Inspector > General MANDATORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF > INSPECTOR GENERAL (3) The following is an abstract from the > Administration for Children and Families' website and the > Administration for Child Support Enforcement, both of which > publish all statutory guidelines for the collection of child > support and payments thereof to the recipient. collection > and distribution of child support payments Within this site > it is defined as follows Frequently Asked Questions about > Child Support Collection/Distribution For answers to > questions about your own case, you need to check with your > local or state child support office. State CSE agency > telephone numbers and addresses are at (English):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ > directories/ext/IVd_list.cfm (Spanish):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ > directories/ext/Espanol_IVd_ list.cfm State CSE agency > web site links are on our web site at the following > location: http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/ programs/cse/extinf.htm#exta > The following general information may be helpful: If the > state collects more in a month than is to be paid to the > family for their current and past due support, the rest of > the money can be used to repay the state and federal > governments for cash assistance * AFDC or TANF * that a > family received. Also, child support agencies can recover > all or part of the costs of their services from people who > are not in a cash assistance program. These can include the > cost of legal work done by agency attorneys or the costs of > locating a parent, for example. The money may be deducted > from the child support payment, or it may be collected from > the noncustodial parent. For more information on changes in > the law and how they may affect you, as well as the cost > recovery practices of your State, you should contact your > State child support enforcement agency. atty general > complaint sent regarding misconduct( SAME ATTORNEY SAME FIRM > WITH KNOWLEDGE OF PRIOR > CASES-http://www.avvo.com/attorneys/32803-fl-ana-tangelrodriguez-1255736.html)/Duty > to Report Lawyer Misconduct--Duty to > Supervise--Responsibilities of Members of Law Firm > Management Committees; These statutes include: Section > 210401 of the Vio Me to parentSent Me to infoSent Me to Investigate@KCTV5.comSent Sheila Jocelyn Shaw http://professsorshaw.blogspot.com/ --- On Thu, 4/28/16, Sheila Shaw wrote: > From: Sheila Shaw > Subject: Fw: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw: prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct > To: "parent" > Date: Thursday, April 28, 2016, 9:40 PM > Me to staff@caught.netSent On Fri, 4/29/16, Sheila Shaw wrote: > From: Sheila Shaw > Subject: Fw: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw: prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct > To: Investigate@KCTV5.com > Date: Friday, April 29, 2016, 3:41 PM > > > Sheila Jocelyn Shaw > http://professsorshaw.blogspot.com/ > > > --- On Thu, 4/28/16, Sheila Shaw > wrote: > > > From: Sheila Shaw > > Subject: Fw: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing > cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court > Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw: > prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct > > To: "parent" > > Date: Thursday, April 28, 2016, 9:40 PM > > > Me to PoliceSent Me to kkovobov@ndaa.orgDrafts Edit Me to ethics.help@usps.govSent Sheila Jocelyn Shaw http://professsorshaw.blogspot.com/ --- On Thu, 4/28/16, Sheila Shaw wrote: > From: Sheila Shaw > Subject: Fw: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw: prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct > To: "info" > Date: Thursday, April 28, 2016, 10:23 PM > Me to Gang AllianceSent Me to Victims2@pacific.eduSent Me to Victims2@pacific.eduSent Me to PublicSent From: Sheila Shaw ; To: ; Subject: Fw: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw Sent: Tue, May 24, 2016 3:50:11 PM From: Sheila Shaw ; To: Gang Alliance ; Subject: Fw: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw: prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct Sent: Wed, May 18, 2016 1:34:14 PM From: Sheila Shaw ; To: ; Subject: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw: prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct Sent: Thu, Apr 28, 2016 7:26:30 PM VAWA REPORT REGARDING NOT ONLY ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT IN CHILD CUSTODY MODIFICATION Intentionally omitted criminal nonsupport, offensive behaviour, professional misconduct and ethnic biasedness, child exploitation and institutional racism Title 42 section 42 1983, 14141 attorney prosecutorial child chustody exploitation including false statements never heard throughout case trial activity, false statements to commence proceedings Case Type: Paternity Date Filed: 4/24/2002 Location: Div 38 UCN: 482002DR006249A001OX Judge: Patricia A Doherty Status: Closed - SRS Date Description Pages Doc Request Doc 7/10/2013 Letter 12 3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address 1 1/1/2007 Case Reassigned to Division 2/11/2005 Notice 11/10/2004 Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 11/10/2004 Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Smith, Maura T 9/24/2004 Court Minutes 9/24/2004 Affidavit 9/13/2004 Pluries Summons Unserved 7/28/2004 Pluries Summons Served 7/27/2004 Notice of Hearing 7/16/2004 Motion to Dismiss 7/14/2004 Notice of Unavailability 7/14/2004 Notice Appearance of Counsel 7/1/2004 Affidavit of Lost/Destroyed Instrument 7/1/2004 Pluries Summons Issued 4/16/2004 Pluries Summons Issued 1/6/2004 Returned Mail 12/26/2003 Certificate of Mailing 12/26/2003 Affidavit 12/26/2003 Notice of Action Issued 10/13/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved 9/12/2003 Pluries Summons Issued 9/3/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved 9/3/2003 Affidavit 9/3/2003 Motion 9/3/2003 Motion for Default 9/3/2003 Affidavit 9/3/2003 Motion 9/3/2003 Motion for Default 8/4/2003 Pluries Summons Issued 7/31/2003 Request for Admissions 6/9/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved 5/21/2003 Pluries Summons Issued 5/1/2003 Third Party Summons 2/11/2003 Pluries Summons Issued 12/26/2002 Pluries Summons Served 11/8/2002 Pluries Summons Issued 9/24/2002 Pluries Summons Unserved 8/30/2002 Pluries Summons Issued 7/29/2002 Summons Returned 7/3/2002 Alias Summons Issued 5/15/2002 Summons Returned 4/24/2002 Summons Issued 4/24/2002 Affidavit of Non Military Service 4/24/2002 Request for Admissions 4/24/2002 Affidavit of Need 4/24/2002 Certificate of Compliance 4/24/2002 Financial Affidavit 4/24/2002 Civil Cover Sheet 4/24/2002 Petition 4/24/2002 Initial Judge Assigned Case Type: Paternity DOR Date Filed: 8/29/2005 Location: Div 42 UCN: 482005DR014270A001OX Judge: Heather P Rodriguez Status: Re-Closed Citation Number: Date Description Pages Doc Request Doc 3/3/2016 Returned Mail 3 2/11/2016 Order Denying 2 2/11/2016 Order Denying 2 4/14/2015 Motion to Vacate 10 4/14/2015 Notice 3 7/3/2013 Letter 5 3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address 1 8/7/2012 Letter 11 5/15/2012 Order Denying 1 5/7/2012 Birth Certificate 1 5/7/2012 Motion 107 5/7/2012 Civil Cover Sheet 2 4/2/2012 Notice of Change of Address 1 4/2/2012 Motion 74 12/5/2011 Letter 3 11/14/2011 Notice of Change of Address 1 9/19/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & Order 2 9/14/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 9/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 9/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 4/6/2011 Returned Mail 2 3/30/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & Order 3 3/28/2011 Child Support Information Sheet 1 3/28/2011 Certified Notice of Delinquent Support 1 3/28/2011 Notice to Depository 1 3/28/2011 Supplemental Financial Statement 1 3/28/2011 Court Minutes 1 3/28/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George 3/22/2011 Returned Mail 2 3/11/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment 1 2/24/2011 Notice of Change of Address 1 2/24/2011 Memorandum 7 2/24/2011 Copy/Copies 6 2/23/2011 Answer 6 2/18/2011 Alias Summons Returned Served 5 2/17/2011 Final Order 1 2/14/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George 1/14/2011 Returned Mail 2 1/4/2011 Notice of Hearing 1 1/4/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment 1 11/29/2010 Notice of Change of Address 1 10/22/2010 Order for Income Deduction 1 10/22/2010 Report/Recommendation and Final Judgment 4 10/19/2010 Court Minutes 1 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) 2 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) 2 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet 2 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet 1 10/19/2010 HEARING - Petition/Motion 10/8/2010 Returned Mail 2 9/20/2010 Order for Non Jury Trial 1 9/17/2010 Notice for Trial 1 8/12/2010 Response 2 6/14/2010 Alias Summons Issued 4 4/9/2010 Summons Returned Unserved 5 12/17/2009 Summons Issued 4 12/17/2009 Certificate of Compliance 2 12/17/2009 Financial Affidavit 4 12/17/2009 Petition 4 12/17/2009 Request for Admissions 1 11/1/2006 Notice of Change of Address 9/28/2006 HRS673 to Bureau 7/19/2006 Letter 7/19/2006 Letter 5/9/2006 Final Judgment 5/9/2006 Order for Income Deduction 5/9/2006 Disposed by Non-Jury Trial 5/9/2006 Final Judgment 5/8/2006 HRS673 to Bureau 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 4/28/2006 Affidavit 4/28/2006 Affidavit 4/28/2006 Court Minutes 3/29/2006 Order for Non Jury Trial 3/29/2006 Notice of Hearing 3/29/2006 Notice for Trial 3/29/2006 Request to Produce 3/28/2006 Request for Admissions 3/28/2006 Notice of Filing HLA Tissue Typing 2/9/2006 Notice 1/10/2006 HRS673 to Bureau 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 Court Minutes 1/5/2006 Financial Affidavit 1/5/2006 Child Support Information Sheet 1/5/2006 Child Support Information Sheet 12/6/2005 Notice of Hearing 12/6/2005 Order for Non Jury Trial 12/6/2005 Request to Produce 12/6/2005 Notice for Trial 12/5/2005 Answer 10/31/2005 Summons Returned 10/31/2005 Summons Returned 10/27/2005 Answer Denying Allegations 8/29/2005 Summons Issued 8/29/2005 Request for Admissions 8/29/2005 Certificate of Compliance 8/29/2005 Financial Affidavit 8/29/2005 Notice of Social Security 8/29/2005 Civil Cover Sheet 8/29/2005 Petition 8/29/2005 Initial Judge Assigned VOR (Viewable on Request) Certain case documents contain sensitive or personally identifiable information that must be manually redacted before they are viewable by the general public. Documents listed in the Docket Events section as VOR are public documents that require further redaction by Clerk staff before they can be viewed. Follow the steps below to request access to these documents: Check the Request Doc checkbox for the document you wish to view. You may repeat this for other VOR documents on the same case. Once all document requests have been made for this case, click the Submit button. A confirmation screen will display, where you will be asked to enter or confirm your email address to finalize your request. You will receive an initial email notification to confirm your request, followed by additional email notifications as requested documents become available. The Clerk’s office makes every effort to complete these requests in a timely manner. For definitions of document types, please refer to our glossary. Hearings Date Hearing Time Location Pages Doc 3/28/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 AM 2/14/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 AM 10/19/2010 Petition/Motion 1:00 PM 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 8:00 AM 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM Cause of Action Fraud Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141: makes it unlawful for state or local law enforcement agencies to allow officers to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives persons of rights protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. This law is commonly referred to as the Police Misconduct Statute. the exintimate partner and public officer employee misconduct BUSINESS TORT RELATED-ADVERSARIAL TORTS OR MATERNAL INJURIES WITH INTENT http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer_29.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/any-police-department-receiving-federal.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/family-violence-prevention-act-victim.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/false-cpi-personal-torts-tort-of-fraud.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/jarrid-williams-probation-dc-346801.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/201 Federal laws Federal law 42 U.S.C. § 5772 & 42 U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5772) defines a "missing child" as "any individual less than 18 years of age whose whereabouts are unknown to such individual"s legal custodian." RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. 827.03 Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; penalties.— intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child; or (c) Active encouragement of any person to commit an act that results or could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child. A person who knowingly or willfully abuses a child without causing great bodily harm, http://definitions.uslegal/ com/w/willful-professional- misconduct PRINCIPAL CASES - HOME STATE ORIGIN INDIANA REGISTER OF ACTIONS CASE NO. 1993-CF-008458-AO cases: OC9901243 PA cases OC9901243 and 02-83719047104532 PA Cause number 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL Narrative "an act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere with the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the dignity of the court or respect for its authority. There are two kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct contempt openly and in the presence of the court, resists the power of the court, 102 A. 400, 406; and consequential, or constructive contempt results from matters outside the court, such as failure to comply... MISUSE OF OFFICE TO ENGAGE IN RACIAL PROFILING, FRAUD, AIDING AND ABETTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT RECOVERY BY FALSE ALLEGATIONS USED TO ABATE DEPARTMENTAL COLLECTION INTERVENTIONS ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT AND MOTHER TO CASES IN THE FAMILY COURT, AND CHILD SUPPORT OCSE, AFFILIATED WITH FLORIDA DCF DEPARTMENTAL RISS SYSTEM DATABASES ON FEBRUARY 4TH, 2011 DURING WHICH TIME COURT DATES OR CONCURRENT ENFORCEMENT ACTION WAS BEING UNDERGONE. CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 MANDATORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERA #Employee Misconduct http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/03/7750844white-collar-crime-victim.html, http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/12/you-cannot-use-information-available-to.html OIG Investigative and Law Enforcement Authority The Office of Inspector General (OIG), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), was administratively established by the Secretary of Agriculture in 1962 following a major criminal fraud scandal affecting several agencies within USDA. OIG was later legislatively established by Congress under the Inspector General Act of 1978 (Public Law [P.L.] 95-452), as amended. Pursuant to the Inspector General Act of 1978 and Section 1337 of the Agriculture and Food Act of 1981 (P.L. 97-98), OIG Investigations is the law enforcement arm of the Department, with Department-wide investigative jurisdiction. OIG Special Agents conduct investigations of significant criminal activities involving USDA programs, operations, and personnel, and are authorized to make arrests, execute warrants, and carry firearms. The types of investigations conducted by OIG Special Agents involve criminal activities such as frauds in subsidy, price support, benefits, and insurance programs; significant thefts of Government property or funds; bribery; extortion; smuggling; and assaults on employees. Investigations involving criminal activity that affects the health and safety of the public, such as meat packers who knowingly sell hazardous food products and individuals who tamper with food regulated by USDA, are also high-profile investigative priorities. In addition, OIG Special Agents are poised to provide emergency law enforcement response to USDA declared emergencies and suspected incidents of terrorism affecting USDA regulated industries, as well as USDA programs, operations, personnel, and installations, in coordination with Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies, as appropriate. The enactment of the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-37) authorized OIG to receive funds and property through criminal and civil Federal forfeiture proceedings, and through equitable sharing of forfeited funds and property controlled by the U.S. Department of Justice. Forfeiture proceeds have severe restrictions mandated by statutes and U.S. Department of Justice policy as to how they are used. Forfeiture funds cannot be used in lieu of the OIG's regular appropriations. False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE (NO. 180-4 https://drive.google.com/folder/d/0B84_tgjFbXNLcUpfaDBSRHBSZDQ/editATORY REPORTING REQUIiREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Clearly outlines employee fraud and misconduct within the scope of cause f action by the Office of the Inspector General within the Florida Departmentof Children. § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § 775.085) (complaint ACAP THE FLORIDA BAR INQUIRY COMPLAINT FORM http://goo.gl/h9wjQr) http://www.dcf.state.fl.us/admin/ig/content/AR2013-14.pdf Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses wdith false reporting for adults. https://oig.justice.gov/hotline/contact-doj.htm cc: letter to OIG FL DCF Keith Parks Resending Complaint Attached Department form (complaint ACAP THE FLORIDA BAR INQUIRY COMPLAINT FORM Fw: ATTN KEITH PARKS CONTINUING INSPECTOR GENERAL MANDATORY REPORTING TO IG OFFICE, MISCONDUCT COMPLAINT Aug 10, 2015, 12:19 PM § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § 775.085 Enhances penalty for crimes evidencing "prejudice based on the race, color, ancestry, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, mental or physical disability, or advanced age of the victim. The duty to report misconduct is one of the ethical duties imposed on attorneys in the United States by the rules governing professional responsibility http://www.iape.org/index.php http://definitions.uslegal. com/w/willful-professional- misconduct/ Rule 8.3—Reporting Professional Misconduct (a) A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, shall inform the appropriate professional authority. (b) A lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for office shall inform the appropriate authority...

WHITE COLLAR CRIMES ABUSE OF PROCESS PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT LAWYER MISCONDUCT JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT

Saturday 25 June 2016

NCJ 110012-110033. Main Term(s): Corruption of public officials Index Term(s): Federal law violations

Thursday 23 June 2016

atty misconduct