http://www.padisciplinaryboard.org/look-up/pa-attorney-search.php

PART 3: PROSECUTOR’S ROLE IN RESOLVING INVESTIGATION PROBLEMS STANDARD 3.1 PROSECUTOR’S ROLE IN ADDRESSING SUSPECTED LAW ENFORCEMENT MISCONDUCT (a) If the prosecutor has reason to suspect misconduct or unauthorized illegal activity at any level of the prosecutor’s office or in any agency or department engaged in a criminal investigation, the prosecutor should promptly report the suspicion and the reason for it to appropriate supervisory personnel in the prosecutor’s office who have authority to address the problem, or to the appropriate inspector general’s office, or similar agency, if reporting within the prosecutor’s own office is problematic. Reporting may also be required to comply with requirements of the applicable rules of professional conduct, the Model Rules and the law of the jurisdiction. (b) If the prosecutor has reason to believe that a criminal investigation or prosecution is, or is likely to be, adversely affected by incompetence, lack of skilled personnel or inadequate resources in the prosecutor’s office or in any other relevant agency or department, the prosecutor should promptly report that belief and the reason for it to supervisory personnel in the prosecutor’s office. (c) A supervisory prosecutor who receives an allegation of misconduct, unauthorized illegal conduct, or who receives an allegation of incompetence, inadequate resources, or lack of skilled personnel that is, or is likely to, adversely affect a criminal investigation, should undertake a prompt and objective review of the facts and circumstances or refer the matter to an appropriate agency or component responsible for addressing such allegations. When practicable, the line prosecutor making any such allegations should not be involved in subsequent investigation(s) relating to the allegation(s). (d) If the prosecutor’s office concludes that there is a reasonable belief that personnel in any agency or department have engaged in unauthorized illegal conduct, the prosecutor’s office should initiate a criminal investigation into the conduct or seek the initiation of such an investigation by an appropriate outside agency or office. (e) If the prosecutor’s office concludes that there was not unauthorized illegal conduct, but concludes that there was incompetence or non-criminal misconduct, the prosecutor’s office should take appropriate action to notify the relevant agency or department, and if within the prosecutor’s own office, to impose sanctions for the conduct. (f) Decisions on how to respond to allegations of unauthorized illegal conduct, misconduct, or significant incompetence should generally be made without regard to adverse consequences on pending cases or investigations. STANDARD 3.2 PROSECUTOR’S ROLE IN ADDRESSSING SUSPECTED JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT (a) Although judges are not exempt from criminal investigation, the prosecutor’s office should protect against the use of false allegations as a means of harassment or abuse that may impact the independence of the judiciary. (b) If a line prosecutor has reason to believe that there is significant misconduct or illegal activity by a member of the judiciary, the line prosecutor should promptly report that belief and the reasons for it to supervisory personnel in the prosecutor’s office. (c) Upon receiving from a line prosecutor, or from any source, an allegation of significant misconduct or illegal conduct by a member of the judiciary, a supervisory prosecutor should undertake a prompt and objective review of the facts and circumstances. (d) If the prosecutor’s office has a reasonable belief that a member of the judiciary has engaged in criminal conduct, the prosecutor’s office should initiate, or seek the initiation of, a criminal investigation. (e) If the prosecutor’s office concludes that a member of the judiciary has not engaged in illegal conduct, but has engaged in non-criminal misconduct, the prosecutor’s office should take appropriate action to inform the relevant officer of the judicial authorities. Reporting may also be required to comply with requirements of the applicable rules of professional conduct, the Model Rules and the law of the jurisdiction. (f) The prosecutor’s office should take reasonable steps to assure the independence of any investigation of a judge before whom the prosecutor’s office practices. In some instances, this may require the appointment of a “pro tem” or “special” prosecutor or use of a “fire-wall” within the prosecutor’s office. STANDARD 3.3 PROSECUTOR’S ROLE IN ADDRESSING SUSPECTED MISCONDUCT BY DEFENSE COUNSEL (a) Although defense counsel are not exempt from criminal investigation, the prosecutor’s office should protect against the use of false allegations as a means of harassment or abuse that may impact the independence of the defense counsel or the Constitutionally protected right to counsel. (b) If a line prosecutor has reason to believe that defense counsel is engaging in criminal conduct, is violating the duty to protect a client, or is engaging in unethical behavior or misconduct, the prosecutor should promptly report that belief and the reasons for it to supervisory personnel in the prosecutor’s office. (c) Upon receiving from a line prosecutor, or from any source, an allegation of misconduct or illegal conduct by defense counsel, a supervisory prosecutor should undertake a prompt and objective review of the facts and circumstances. (d) If the prosecutor’s office has a reasonable belief that defense counsel has engaged in illegal conduct, the prosecutor’s office should initiate, or seek the initiation of, an investigation into the conduct. (e) If the prosecutor’s office concludes that defense counsel has not engaged in illegal conduct, but has engaged in non-criminal misconduct as defined by the governing ethical code and the rules of the jurisdiction, the prosecutor’s office should take appropriate action to inform the appropriate disciplinary authority. (f) The prosecutor’s office should take reasonable steps to assure the independence of any investigation of a defense counsel including, if appropriate, the appointment of a pro tem or special prosecutor or use of a “fire-wall” within the prosecutor’s office. At a minimum, an investigation of defense counsel’s conduct should be conducted by a prosecutor who has not been involved in the initial matter or in ongoing matters with that defense counsel. (g) The prosecutor investigating defense counsel should consider whether information regarding conduct by defense counsel should be provided to a judicial officer involved in overseeing aspects of the investigation in which the misconduct occurred. (h) The prosecutor investigating defense counsel who is representing a client in a criminal matter under the jurisdiction of the prosecutor’s office ordinarily should notify the attorney and the court in a timely manner about the possibility that potential charges against the attorney may create a conflict of interest.866.400.IIFC

intentionally omitted information available through digital forensics investigation regarding misconduct and false statement Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT COMPLAINT- PEER REPORTING -Attorney General's Office regarding Rule 84 of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct contains the following statements on attorney misconduct-18 USC Chapter 47 - FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS

Fw:4 PATTERNS OF EMPLOYEE VIOLATIONS CF-180-4: OPERATING PROCEDURE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FAMILY/LEGAL PROBLEMS - CASES NOTES -50 STATE TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT Feb 13, 2016, 2:29 PM From Me Details From: Sheila Shaw ; To: ; Subject: Fw: PATTERNS OF EMPLOYEE VIOLATIONS CF-180-4: OPERATING PROCEDURE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FAMILY/LEGAL PROBLEMS - CASES NOTES -50 STATE TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT Sent: Sat, Feb 13, 2016 7:26:56 PM From: Sheila Shaw ; To: USF ; Cc: USF ; Subject: Fw: PATTERNS OF EMPLOYEE VIOLATIONS CF-180-4: OPERATING PROCEDURE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FAMILY/LEGAL PROBLEMS - CASES NOTES -50 STATE TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT Sent: Sat, Feb 13, 2016 7:07:32 PM From: Sheila Shaw ; To: planned parenthood ; Subject: Fw: PATTERNS OF EMPLOYEE VIOLATIONS CF-180-4: OPERATING PROCEDURE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FAMILY/LEGAL PROBLEMS - CASES NOTES -50 STATE TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT PROCESS: http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/child-support-process-administrative-vs-judicial.aspx ADMINISTRATIVE MISCONDUCT, MISUSE OF OFFICE - A PATTERN OF INSTITUTIONAL RACISM, UNCONSCIONABLE DELAYS AND RESERVES IN A MIXED RACIAL CASE HISTORY AND HISTORICAL DATA, IVD CASES AND FOREIGN DOMESTICATION OF ORDERS SINCE THE ONSET OF REGISTRY FROM THE STATE(s) OF ORIGIN, INCLUDING ADMINISTRATIVE MISCONDUCT AND FRAUD IN ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA Sent: Wed, Feb 10, 2016 8:58:16 PM From: Sheila Shaw ; To: benw ; Subject: Fw: PATTERNS OF EMPLOYEE VIOLATIONS CF-180-4: OPERATING PROCEDURE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FAMILY/LEGAL PROBLEMS - CASES NOTES -50 STATE TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT PROCESS: http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/child-support-process-administrative-vs-judicial.aspx ADMINISTRATIVE MISCONDUCT, MISUSE OF OFFICE - A PATTERN OF INSTITUTIONAL RACISM, UNCONSCIONABLE DELAYS AND RESERVES IN A MIXED RACIAL CASE HISTORY AND HISTORICAL DATA, IVD CASES AND FOREIGN DOMESTICATION OF ORDERS SINCE THE ONSET OF REGISTRY FROM THE STATE(s) OF ORIGIN, INCLUDING ADMINISTRATIVE MISCONDUCT AND FRAUD IN ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA Sent: Tue, Feb 9, 2016 11:52:07 PM From: Sheila Shaw ; To: whistleblower@oighud.gov ; Subject: Fw: PATTERNS OF EMPLOYEE VIOLATIONS CF-180-4: OPERATING PROCEDURE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FAMILY/LEGAL PROBLEMS - CASES NOTES -50 STATE TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT PROCESS: http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/child-support-process-administrative-vs-judicial.aspx ADMINISTRATIVE MISCONDUCT, MISUSE OF OFFICE - A PATTERN OF INSTITUTIONAL RACISM, UNCONSCIONABLE DELAYS AND RESERVES IN A MIXED RACIAL CASE HISTORY AND HISTORICAL DATA, IVD CASES AND FOREIGN DOMESTICATION OF ORDERS SINCE THE ONSET OF REGISTRY FROM THE STATE(s) OF ORIGIN, INCLUDING ADMINISTRATIVE MISCONDUCT AND FRAUD IN ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA Sent: Wed, Dec 16, 2015 10:27:09 PM Sheila Jocelyn Shaw http://professsorshaw.blogspot.com/ On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 9:02 AM, Sheila Shaw wrote: From: Sheila Shaw ; To: info@EverestCares.com ; Subject: FAMILY/LEGAL PROBLEMS - CASES NOTES -50 STATE TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT PROCESS: http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/child-support-process-administrative-vs-judicial.aspx ADMINISTRATIVE MISCONDUCT, MISUSE OF OFFICE - A PATTERN OF INSTITUTIONAL RACISM, UNCONSCIONABLE DELAYS AND RESERVES IN A MIXED RACIAL CASE HISTORY AND HISTORICAL DATA, IVD CASES AND FOREIGN DOMESTICATION OF ORDERS SINCE THE ONSET OF REGISTRY FROM THE STATE(s) OF ORIGIN, INCLUDING ADMINISTRATIVE MISCONDUCT AND FRAUD IN ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA Sent: Sat, Dec 12, 2015 12:32:08 PM AGGRAVATED WHITE COLLAR CRIME- MULTIPLE WHITE COLLAR CRIMINAL INCIDENTS CIRCUMVENTING ORANGE COUNTY FLORIDA CASE REGISTRIES- CHILD SUPPORT, CHILD CUSTODY (http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/model-domestic-violence-law-enforcement.html) (http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/08/aggravated-white-collar-criminal.html) (http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/pa-cases-historical-data-from-he-sate.html) (http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/07/absent-notice-of-related-cases-as.html) (http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/07/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer.html) You cannot use information available to you because of your job, but not available to the public, for your personal benefit or for the benefit of others. § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § 775.085 Enhances penalty for crimes evidencing "prejudice based on the race, color, ancestry, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, mental or physical disability, or advanced age of the victim. The duty to report misconduct is one of the ethical duties imposed on attorneys in the United States by the rules governing professional responsibility http://www.iape.org/index.php http://definitions.uslegal. com/w/willful-professional- misconduct/ Rule 8.3—Reporting Professional Misconduct (a) A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, shall inform the appropriate professional authority. (b) A lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for office shall inform the appropriate authority. (c) This rule does not require disclosure of information otherwise protected by Rule 1.6 or other law. http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309048893 Cases 2005-DR-014270-O (Paternity) P I I Lead Attorneys Petitioner SHAW, SHEILA J BARBARA FANCHER(LIMITED) JONES, Esquire Retained 407-849-1133(W) Respondent GONZALEZ, CARLOS A RUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire Retained 407-786-2889(W) E & O C & O C DISPOSITIONS 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 2004 OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS 01/01/ Case Reassigned to Division 2007 Case Reassigned to Division|CASE REASSIGNED TO JUDGE 38 02/11/ Notice 2005 Notice|NOTICE OF CONCLUSION OF REPRESENTATION 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 2004 Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing|FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL AFTER HEARING RECORDED COMPLAINT FORWARED TO THE ATTORNEY CONSUMER ASSISTANT PROGRAM (ACAP) REGARDING MISCONDUCT-OMISSION, ETHNIC BIASES CONVEYED IN CASE HISTORIES PERPETUATING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. RELATED CASES - PRINCIPAL JUDICIAL OR PROFESSION MISCONDUCT-FRAUD ON THE COURTS- PERSONAL AND BUSINESS TORT RELATED-ADVERSARIAL TORTS OR MATERNAL INJURIES WITH INTENT http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer_29.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/any-police-department-receiving-federal.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/family-violence-prevention-act-victim.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/false-cpi-personal-torts-tort-of-fraud.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/jarrid-williams-probation-dc-346801.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/201 Federal laws Federal law 42 U.S.C. § 5772 & 42 U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5772) defines a "missing child" as "any individual less than 18 years of age whose whereabouts are unknown to such individual"s legal custodian." RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. 827.03 Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; penalties.— intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child; or (c) Active encouragement of any person to commit an act that results or could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child. A person who knowingly or willfully abuses a child without causing great bodily harm, http://definitions.uslegal. com/w/willful-professional- misconduct PRINCIPAL CASES - HOME STATE ORIGIN INDIANA REGISTER OF ACTIONS CASE NO. 1993-CF-008458-AO cases: OC9901243 PA cases OC9901243 and 02-83719047104532 PA Cause number 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL 2010-DP 1170 FL INDIANA CASE NUMBERS Paternity case file no J18720 filed 11-16-71/11-24-71 order date Shirley Ann Shaw/Claude R. Jackson mariired December 31st, 1978 marriage license number CDR-94-114 Shirley Ann Shaw Joseph Nikolaenko marriage ended June 30, 1995 Buddmeeks Ctr Domestic case DCM-91-6993 1991 marriage license number 02D01-9707-ML-001399 07/08/97 married on 07/26/1997 DOB 04/21/46 Joseph Nikolaenko mother Michlaina Nikolaenko 5012 Pacer Run Ft. Wayne, IN Gwedolyn Ann Brown DOB 04/12/60 son Tyrese Dartanvan Brown father Thomas Lewis Brown mother Mary Lee Spann 3054 Schele Ave Ft. Wayne, IN Dorothy Jackson Claude Jackson married July 2, 1983 Divorce petition 02C01-9110-D1-1313 CDR-91-1313 "...Additionally, whether substantive or procedural misconduct is the basis for the sanction, the trial court must hold an evidentiary hearing before dismissing a case with prejudice,8 and must make an express finding that the conduct forming the basis for the dismissal was willful or done in bad faith or was deliberate and in contumacious disregard of the court’s authority.9 Appellate courts do not hesitate to reverse and remand for noncompliance with these requirements. Substantive misconduct is and should be subject to less tolerance before dismissal with prejudice is warranted. Lying about facts central to the case, including the nature and extent of one’s own injuries, simply cannot be tolerated and, frequently, cannot be remedied by any lesser sanction than dismissal with prejudice." Cases: administrative misconduct, judicial misconduct issues circumventing TITLE 42 SECTIONS 666 AND 654, 657 COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION CITATION FROM THE FEDERAL STATUTE OF THE US CODE § 657. Distribution of collected support 50 STATE TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT PROCESS http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/child-support-process-administrative-vs-judicial.aspx Child support orders can be established by the courts or by an administrative entity. In the administrative process, the state child support agency, also referred to as the IV-D agency, establishes the support order, usually without a hearing. In the judicial process, the court sets the order. Many states use a hybrid, or quasi-judicial process, which incorporates some judicial elements mixed with administrative processes. For example, many states may use an administrative forum, such as an attorney general’s office, but may incorporate a judicial element, such as an attorney. The three elements that determine where a process falls on the administrative/judicial continuum are 1) the forum used, 2) presiding officer, and 3) attorney involvement. The forum used simply means where the child support order is processed. Forums can include a courtroom, an administrative office of the court, the offices of an executive branch division such as the office of administrative hearings or attorney general’s office, the IV-D umbrella agency, or the IV-D agency itself. The presiding officer is the person who is in charge of supervising and running the process. Attorney involvement refers to whether or not an attorney represents the IV-D agency during the process. A state with a highly judicial process is one in which the forum used is a courtroom, the presiding officer is a judge, and the IV-D agency is represented by an attorney. States may be quasi-judicial, which means that the forum used may be a courtroom, but instead of a judge presiding, it may be a hearing officer who oversees the process. It is difficult to categorize states as fully judicial or fully administrative as the process differs depending on the type of order being processed. For example, there may be different processes for contested (challenged) and uncontested orders. Cases 2002-DR-050423-1 SHAW, SHEILA J 03/0912002 VS, COLEMAN, Family JIMMY L Income Deduction 0 Closed - Non SRS 2002-DR-006249-0 SHAW, SHEILA J 04124/2002 Paternity vs. GONZALEZ, Div 38 Closed - SRS CARLOS A Kest, Sally D M SHAW, SHEILA 08/29/2005 Paternity DOR JOCELYN VS. Div42 Re-Closed GONZALEZ, Evans, Robert M CARLOS ALBERTO SHAW, SHEILA 01/06/2010 Child Support DOR JOCELYN Div 42 Reopened Other KARENA vs. Evans, Robert M WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN SHAW, SHEILA 04112/2011 Domestic Violence w JOCELYN VS. Div 44 Closed - SRS WILLIAMS, JARRID Jordan, John E DESHAUN 2005-DR-014270-0 2010-DR-000170-0 2011-0R-006367-0 CIRCUMVENTING COMPLAINTS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND ENFORCEMENT UNDER (1) CIVIL ACTIONS BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SEC. 2000e-6. [Section 707] (a) Complaint... (2) STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CF OPERATING PROCEDURE CHILDREN AND FAMILIES NO. 180-4 TALLAHASSEE, October 29, 2007 Inspector General MANDATORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL (3) The following is an abstract from the Administration for Children and Families' website and the Administration for Child Support Enforcement, both of which publish all statutory guidelines for the collection of child support and payments thereof to the recipient. collection and distribution of child support payments Within this site it is defined as follows Frequently Asked Questions about Child Support Collection/Distribution For answers to questions about your own case, you need to check with your local or state child support office. State CSE agency telephone numbers and addresses are at (English):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ directories/ext/IVd_list.cfm (Spanish):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ directories/ext/Espanol_IVd_ list.cfm State CSE agency web site links are on our web site at the following location: http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/ programs/cse/extinf.htm#exta The following general information may be helpful: If the state collects more in a month than is to be paid to the family for their current and past due support, the rest of the money can be used to repay the state and federal governments for cash assistance * AFDC or TANF * that a family received. Also, child support agencies can recover all or part of the costs of their services from people who are not in a cash assistance program. These can include the cost of legal work done by agency attorneys or the costs of locating a parent, for example. The money may be deducted from the child support payment, or it may be collected from the noncustodial parent. For more information on changes in the law and how they may affect you, as well as the cost recovery practices of your State, you should contact your State child support enforcement agency. atty general complaint sent regarding misconduct( SAME ATTORNEY SAME FIRM WITH KNOWLEDGE OF PRIOR CASES-http://www.avvo.com/attorneys/32803-fl-ana-tangelrodriguez-1255736.html)/Duty to Report Lawyer Misconduct--Duty to Supervise--Responsibilities of Members of Law Firm Management Committees; These statutes include: Section 210401 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (Police Misconduct Provision), 42 U.S.C. § 14141, which authorizes the Department to file suit challenging a pattern or practice of misconduct by law enforcement officers (or employees of any governmental agency with responsibility for the administration of juvenile justice or the incarceration of juveniles) that deprives persons of constitutional or federal statutory rights; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., which prohibits recipients of federal financial assistance (including law enforcement agencies) from discriminating on the basis of race, color, (18 usc 2326)REAL CASES VS. MALICIOUS PROSECUTION/IMPLICATION http://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-publications/working-group-reports/intellectual-property-and-tech/19980128_Telemarketing_Fraud.pdf (http://www.nvo.com/beaulier/deadbeatparentspunishmentact/ ATTACHED DOCUMENTATION OF THE STATUTORY GUIDELINES) whereas there was exhibited criminal non support by the Respondent, Carlos Alberto Gonzales, is defined as willfully, knowingly and with specific intent did evade a financial acknowledgement and affidavit which was signed as of March of 2005 (willfulness is a " knowing and intentional violation of a known legal duty.") The level of proof for a criminal non-support action is "beyond a reasonable doubt". This means that the prosecutor must be able to see a high level of evidence of: the identity of the absent parent/defendant, the absent parent/defendant's ability to pay the amount of support ordered, and the lack of payments made. ...A parent commits the crime of nonsupport if such parent knowingly fails to provide, without good cause, adequate support which such parent is legally obligated to provide for his child or stepchild who is not otherwise emancipated by operation of law. Criminal nonsupport is a class A misdemeanor, unless the person obligated to pay child support commits the crime of nonsupport in each of six individual months within any twelve-month period, or the total arrearage is in excess of five thousand dollars, in either of which case it is a class D felony in some states. Deadbeat Parent Punishment Act , making non-support in some interstate cases a federal felony offense RE: Abuse of process complaint filed against Dr. Grove re: Isis Shaw Fwd: PRACTITIONER OF RECORD ON FILE THE DATE OF ALLEGED KIDNAPPING & MISSING PERSONS COMPLAINT 02/03/2011 BY FELICIA HANDLEY Fwd: caught.net AFFIDAVIT ATTACHED REGARDING POLICE MISCONDUCT Re: color of law violations Florida statutes 112/medicaid identification number for Isis neonatal records Fwd: WRIT OF HABAES CORPUS CONTESTING CUSTODY ORDER 2003 FL title XLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 The act contains 11 titles, or sections, ranging from additional corporate board responsibilities to criminal penalties, and requires the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to implement rulings on requirements to comply with the law. Harvey Pitt, the 26th chairman of the SEC, led the SEC in the adoption of dozens of rules to implement the Sarbanes–Oxley Act. It created a new, quasi-public agency, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, charged with overseeing, regulating, inspecting and disciplining accounting firms in their roles as auditors of public companies http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarbanes%E2%80%93Oxley_Act http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/cpr/mrpc/MRPCSubjectGuide.authcheckdam.pdf http://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/model_rules_of_professional_conduct_table_of_contents.html Case notes: (1) http://divorce.lovetoknow.com/National_Deadbeat_Dad_List Federal Child Support Laws There are two federal child support laws that dictate what can and should be done with fathers who aren't paying child support. The Child Support Recovery Act The Child Support Recovery Act of 1992 prescribes misdemeanor penalties for parents who fail to pay child support. For a court to levy these penalties, the parent must be required by a court order to pay child support, and there must be documented evidence of said parent's failure to pay. The Deadbeat Parents Punishment Act The Deadbeat Parents Punishment Act of 1998 prescribes felony punishments for nonpaying parents who cross state lines in an attempt to evade making child support payments. For prosecution, multiple state's law enforcement and child support agencies work together to locate and return the nonpaying parent to the state in which he owes child support. For prosecution, the nonpaying parent must owe more than $5,000, be able to pay the overdue support, have intentionally not made required payments and have crossed state lines to avoid making payments. State-Level Enforcement Financial support is considered the right of the child and not the parent. Therefore, child support failure-to-pay proceedings are managed by each state's child support enforcement agency on behalf of the child and child support laws vary from one state to another. Some agencies will assist you with obtaining a court order declaring the child's right to financial support, while others require that you complete this step on your own. Historical data is indicative of non cooperation by the nonparents, no punitive father action toward meeting financial obligation or statutory code. Jarrid Deshaun Williams, attempted to fabricate medical records and did in fact obstruct medical care with intent to inflict personal injury as a means of punishment and discredit the mother’s care of her daughter, omitted case history within DCF records include:absent advance directives from practitioners of which the child was a patient 9457320158 (RFA CASE NUMBER 1143172973) Mental cruelty was exhibited, a pattern of abuse that the primary residential parents, Jarrid Deshaun Williams and Carlos Alberto Gonzalez, maintained for a period of more than six months, throughout attempts to arbitrate on terms of mutual civility which was unattainable and my entitled rights, as the mother,natural parent, those inalienable rights were restrained from me causing gross infliction of intentional personal mental distress and mental cruelty towards the children and myself by the biological fathers after the fathers had maintained several years of nonsupport and absent contribution towards the child’s mental and financial well being as illustrated in court proceedings in division 42, Orange County, Florida. The behavior of which the attempted direction of arbitration was directed towards the mother as retaliatory behavior due to previous attempts to collect child support over several years regarding Michyl Jacob E. Shaw and Isis Jashuana C. J. Shaw. Extensive days and hours of obstructed communication and visitation with children through arbitration methods and as discussed with the fathers on several occasions to again fabricate mental distress alleged in a third party complaint, that the fathers did in fact intentional create situations to deny communication with intent to retaliate and create offensive behavior situations with third parties. Regarding the precipitating child support arrears hearing, in the Carlos Alberto Gonzalez case on 02/14/2011, to include Division and Judicial Representative Heard in Division 42, Ninth Circuity, Orange County, Orlando, Florida 32801 Judicial Hearing Officer: George Winslow, in Division 42 Judge Evans;division 42 case number changed, Case No 02DR6249 NOW 05-17420, regarding principal criminal judicial criminal activity to aid/assist criminal nonsupport George Winslow Regarding delayed child support, the employer/income deduction order modification,the amount of child support set at $30.69 per week due to unemployment, in the case of Jarrid Deshaun Williams, had not been adjusted or set at COLA as of the 11th day of February of 2010 when the order setting non jury trial for matters of paternity, F.S. 742.10 Establishment of paternity for children born out of wedlock. it was set on the 1st day of April of 2010, whereas the child’s date of birth for Isis Jashauna Camirin Jewel Shaw is the 29th day of January of 2007, a period of more than three years prior to the date the child support order was entered during which time the non-parent was unemployed. The mother, Dr. Sheila Jocelyn Karena Shaw, had been supporting the child from post- delivery including medical insurance payments that until April 30th of 2011 were solely in the mother’s name and responsibility, a post delivery bill of$ 9780 from Winnie Palmer Hospital, Orlando, Florida, of which the non-parent has refused to make payments towards aside from all other responsibilities incurred prior, and post-delivery. A writ of habas corpus, as defined in chapters 32 and 90-92.11 F.S., causes for immediate action and remedy by the court for violations of those rights and liberties, that are fundamental and should be enforced by law enforcement agencies, of which precedent case laws regarding child support obligations, visitations and the rights of the mother were infracted statutory code. Attached are the letters and review dates regarding an adjustment hearing of the order child-support , for Isis Jashauna Camirin Jewel Shaw, set on April 1st of 2010. Statutory Codes including The Parental Rights Amendment of the federal Constitution and the Florida State Constitution section 23 (complaint regarding violations of privacy provisions, privacy rights) 92.02-92.15, 92.19 temporary custody must meet constitutional test, the non-parent must demonstrate that he has met punitative father actions, paternity obligations including financial support, (Purpose) The writ of habas corpos is being filed in this case regarding use of a writ of habas corpos "whereas the parent has been deprived of their fundamental rights, fundamental liberty, interest of natural parents, in the the care, custody and management of their children without due process, precedent case; Santosky v. Bernhardt S. Karmer, 455 U.S.745 (1982) Whereas the court dockets of division 42, family court matters clear and visibly shows that the non-parent had not met demonstrative constitutional test regarding financial obligations and that pre-screening was inadequate,and there was manipulation of records including child support obligations, require program health records including neonatal medical records to date health practitioner records required for DCF programs including 4C childcare applications, program participation requirements, that those records where not presented in case number DP1140 intentionally towards the benefit of the non-parent and that administrative powers had not been enforced in collection of punitative father obligations when they could have been availed to prevent unconscionable delay in application,enforcement without judicial action. (2)Case No 02DR6249 NOW 05-17420 WRIT COMPLAINT AGAINST GEORGE WINSLOW, JR., JUDICIAL HEARING OFFICER, NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT CASE NO DR-05-14270, COMPLAINT AGAINST CLAUDIA HERNADEZ FW: your ltr to counsel FW: nonparents Cases/Clerk of Court Fw: FL Statutes 90.21-90.35 DCF administrative powers(92.02-92.15, 92.19) FW: case no DP1140Writs/COLOR OF LAW COMPLAINTS Title VI of the Civil Rights Act states that "No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance." In February 1994, President Clinton issued Executive Order 12898, "Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations." In a separate memorandum, President Clinton identified Title VI as one of several federal laws already in existence that can help "to prevent minority communities and low-income communities from being subject to disproportionately high and adverse environmental effects." There are several basic differences between EPA's responsibilities under Title VI and under Executive Order 12898: Title VI Title VI prohibits recipients of federal financial assistance (e.g., states, universities, local governments) from discriminating on the basis of race, color, or national origin in their programs or activities. Title VI is a federal law that applies to federal financial assistance recipients (i.e., persons or entities that receive EPA financial assistance) and not to EPA itself as the Executive Order does. Title VI allows persons to file administrative complaints with the federal departments and agencies that provide financial assistance alleging discrimination based on race, color, or national origin by recipients of federal funds. Under Title VI, EPA has a responsibility to ensure that its funds are not being used to subsidize discrimination based on race, color, or national origin. This prohibition against discrimination under Title VI has been a statutory mandate since 1964 and EPA has had Title VI regulations since 1973. EPA's Office of Civil Rights is responsible for the Agency's administration of Title VI, including investigation of such DIVISION 42 CASE NUMBER CHANGED Case No 02DR6249 NOW 05-17420 Fw: REGARDING "PRINCIPAL"CRIMINAL JUDICAL CRIMINAL ACTIVITY TO AID/ASSIST CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT George Winslow Trial or Ajudication Errors Dates of Petitioner Responding are inaccurate, date extends from February 14th 2011, February 15th, 2011 March 28th,20100 (10 days after initial hearing date) not September 12, 2011. intentional mis-statement of the date entered for reason of subsequent initiation of another case involving the minor Mockery of the law-implied Veil of Ignorance regarding formation of the law Manipulation of records, Florida Statute 112, Change in case numbers whereas there was is a "highly visible" evidenced by court dockets and records retained by DCF illustrating no support order until one was entered in November of 2010 also records retained by the local Orange County OCSE office. from the acknowledgement of paternity to date of order was more than ten years regarding the age of the child whereas the minor's age, as a minority disability should have expedited a response time that no voluntary action on behalf the father was made, No inquiry or evidenced was made to the father regarding any payments of such which were not made Abuse of discretionary free will or exercise of legal authority and lack of impartial judgement by George Winslow, Jr. specific performane of which the law was intended regarding financial obligation unconcionable delay in entering a current support order, retroactive child support order, or administrative remedy regarding arrears, the child's entitlement to equal enforcement of the laws available and applied Uniform Laws Case No 02DR6249 Once paternity is established legally, a child gains legal rights and privileges If the father is willing to sign documents to acknowledge paternity and agree to support, then enforcement can proceed by an income withholding order. The Respondent requested genetic testing, whereas the results were submitted to the court, and the biological father. Establishing paternity establishes a financial commitment from the father to the child Criminal Nonsupport (568.040) Criminal nonsupport is defined as knowingly fails to provide, without good cause, adequate support for his spouse; a parent commits the crime of nonsupport if such parent knowingly fails to provide, without good cause, adequate support which such parent is legally obligated to provide for his child or stepchild who is not otherwise emancipated by operation of law. Criminal nonsupport is a class A misdemeanor, unless the person obligated to pay child support commits the crime of nonsupport in each of six individual months within any twelve-month period, or the total arrearage is in excess of five thousand dollars, in either of which case it is a class D felony. 1. A criminal non-support action may be filed either as a misdemeanor or a felony offense Misdemeanor, 1st degree Criteria: fails to provide adequate support, and ability to pay based on evidence presented to county Prosecutor. Decision to prosecute is made by the county Prosecutor Penalties: Maximum $1000.00 fine Maximum six months jail time Felony, 4th degree Criteria: Absent parent/defendant has previously plead guilty or been convicted of felony non-support Penalties: O.R.C., section 2929.11 Maximum $2500.00 fine Maximum 5 years in prison Felony, 5th degree Criteria: absent parent/defendant has previously plead guilty or been convicted of misdemeanor non-support, or if the arrearage is equal to the amount of support ordered for an accumulated period of 26 weeks out of 104 consecutive weeks Penalties: O.R.C., section 2929.11 Maximum $2500.00 fine Maximum 5 years in prison 2. Level of Proof The level of proof for a criminal non-support action is "beyond a reasonable doubt". This means that the prosecutor must be able to see a high level of evidence of: the identity of the absent parent/defendant, the absent parent/defendant's ability to pay the amount of support ordered, and the lack of payments made. 3. Venue Location where the crime occurred. The crime is the lack of payments being made to the child , so cases are normally filed in the county where the custodial parent and child or children reside. Personal jurisdiction over the absent parent/defendant required: long arm jurisdiction over the absent parent, the absent parent is still in Ohio, making local service of a summons or warrant possible, or it becomes possible to serve the absent parent/defendant with a summons or warrant while that person is physically in Ohio, even for a short period of time. (3) Central Region Karlene Cole-Palmer CLS Regional Director Children’s Legal Services Department of Children and Families 400 West Robinson Street, Suite S1114 Orlando, Florida 32801 Office: (407) 245-0530 E-mail: Karlene_Cole-Palmer@dcf.state.fl.us Karlene Cole-Palmer, I spoke with John Hammet regarding the inquiry your agency's CPI made when she called my mother, Shirley Ann Shaw-Wetzel, (formerly Shirley Ann Shaw-Nikolaenko), whereas she inquired about my academic credentials, title, and if I had any history of mental illness ill respective to any proper investigative measures, an act of negligence, and very offensively as well as ignorantly stated in belief as to whether my educational background was valid. None of which is relative to the lack of contact that should have been made to the Orange County School Board Division of Home Education and Principal regarding the facts of Orange County District Schools, government supervised programs or nonjurisdictional programs, school choice, parental choice or dual enrollment programs, again none of which was brought to the juvenile court proceeds or information that was intentionally with knowledge omitted from proceeding during which false statement were made against myself the children's mother. Again absent neonatal child advance directives from practitioners and daycare providers of which mandatory reporting guidelines are a policy in reporting any child abuse and neglect, none (childwelfare.gov and https://www.childwelfare.gov/responding/mandated.cfm) The following complaint detail further information regarding my complaint. DCF John Hammett program administer 4075632381 RE: the most recent contact from the Orlando area CPI 2002-DR-050423-1 SHAW, SHEILA J 03/0912002 VS, COLEMAN, Family JIMMY L Income Deduction 0 Closed - Non SRS 2002-DR-006249-0 SHAW, SHEILA J 04124/2002 Paternity vs. GONZALEZ, Div 38 Closed - SRS CARLOS A Kest, Sally D M SHAW, SHEILA 08/29/2005 Paternity DOR JOCELYN VS. Div42 Re-Closed GONZALEZ, Evans, Robert M CARLOS ALBERTO SHAW, SHEILA 01/06/2010 Child Support DOR JOCELYN Div 42 Reopened Other KARENA vs. Evans, Robert M WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN SHAW, SHEILA 04112/2011 Domestic Violence w JOCELYN VS. Div 44 Closed - SRS WILLIAMS, JARRID Jordan, John E DESHAUN 2005-DR-014270-0 2010-DR-000170-0 2011-0R-006367-0 previous CPI complaint regarding Felicia Handley was forwarding regarding her malicious lie to obtain court venue to not only commit a hate crime but to commit fraud on the court and exploit the children in the aforementioned cases ALL REPRESENTING PARTIES HAD ACCESS TO THE FLORIDA ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF THE COURT REGISTERS OF ACTION, A DUTY OF CARE HIGHER THAN THAT OF THE OTHER PARTIES, AND WITH KNOWLEDGE AND INTENT TO OMIT INFORMATION THAT WOULD HAVE ELIMINATED SOME OF THE BIASEDNESS THE JUDGE HELD DUE TO FELICIA HANDLEY'S FALSE KIDNAPPING COMPLAINT WHICH SHE STATED AFTER PROCEEDING HAD BEEN DISMISSED ON JANUARY 28TH, 2011 IN JUDGE ANTHONY'S COURT ROOM IN THE JUVENILE COURT. WITHIN A MATTER OF DAYS FELICIA HANDLEY COMES BACK TO THE JUVENILE COURT WITH A MALICIOUS LIE THAT THE CHILDREN WERE IN SOMEONE ELSE'S CUSTODY WHEN IN FACT THE COURT HAD HEARD THE INITIAL ALLEGATIONS AND THE CHILDREN WERE RETURNED HOME WITH THE MOTHER UNTIL WHICH A TEMPORARY CUSTODY ORDER AFTER THE ALLEGATIONS WAS ISSUED ON FEBRUARY 4TH, 2011 TO ABATE LEGAL REPRESENTATION FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (IRS) OCSE OFFICE AND ATTORNEYS OF WHOM THE SAME REPRESENTATION IS INDICATIVE IN THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT OF THE ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS, ROOM 150. Lawyers holding public office assume legal responsibilities going beyond those of other citizens. A lawyer's abuse of public office can suggest an inability to fulfill the professional role of attorney. The same is true of abuse of positions of private trust such as trustee, executor, administrator, guardian, or agent and officer, director, or manager of a corporation or other organization http://www.floridabar.org/DIVCOM/JN/JNJournal01.nsf/c0d731e03de9828d852574580042ae7a/7ee566f4f7305b2085256e24006a34b6!OpenDocument&Highlight=0,disability* The basic standards governing fraud on the court are reasonably straightforward. As set forth in Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998): The requisite fraud on the court occurs where “it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.” Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989) . . . . The trial court has the inherent authority, within the exercise of sound judicial discretion, to dismiss an action when a plaintiff has perpetrated a fraud on the court, or where a party refuses to comply with court orders. Kornblum v. Schneider, 609 So. 2d 138, 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

Fw: PATTERNS OF EMPLOYEE VIOLATIONS CF-180-4: OPERATING PROCEDURE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FAMILY/LEGAL PROBLEMS - CASES NOTES -50 STATE TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT Feb 13, 2016, 2:29 PM From Me Details From: Sheila Shaw ; To: ; Subject: Fw: PATTERNS OF EMPLOYEE VIOLATIONS CF-180-4: OPERATING PROCEDURE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FAMILY/LEGAL PROBLEMS - CASES NOTES -50 STATE TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT Sent: Sat, Feb 13, 2016 7:26:56 PM From: Sheila Shaw ; To: USF ; Cc: USF ; Subject: Fw: PATTERNS OF EMPLOYEE VIOLATIONS CF-180-4: OPERATING PROCEDURE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FAMILY/LEGAL PROBLEMS - CASES NOTES -50 STATE TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT Sent: Sat, Feb 13, 2016 7:07:32 PM From: Sheila Shaw ; To: planned parenthood ; Subject: Fw: PATTERNS OF EMPLOYEE VIOLATIONS CF-180-4: OPERATING PROCEDURE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FAMILY/LEGAL PROBLEMS - CASES NOTES -50 STATE TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT PROCESS: http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/child-support-process-administrative-vs-judicial.aspx ADMINISTRATIVE MISCONDUCT, MISUSE OF OFFICE - A PATTERN OF INSTITUTIONAL RACISM, UNCONSCIONABLE DELAYS AND RESERVES IN A MIXED RACIAL CASE HISTORY AND HISTORICAL DATA, IVD CASES AND FOREIGN DOMESTICATION OF ORDERS SINCE THE ONSET OF REGISTRY FROM THE STATE(s) OF ORIGIN, INCLUDING ADMINISTRATIVE MISCONDUCT AND FRAUD IN ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA Sent: Wed, Feb 10, 2016 8:58:16 PM From: Sheila Shaw ; To: benw ; Subject: Fw: PATTERNS OF EMPLOYEE VIOLATIONS CF-180-4: OPERATING PROCEDURE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FAMILY/LEGAL PROBLEMS - CASES NOTES -50 STATE TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT PROCESS: http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/child-support-process-administrative-vs-judicial.aspx ADMINISTRATIVE MISCONDUCT, MISUSE OF OFFICE - A PATTERN OF INSTITUTIONAL RACISM, UNCONSCIONABLE DELAYS AND RESERVES IN A MIXED RACIAL CASE HISTORY AND HISTORICAL DATA, IVD CASES AND FOREIGN DOMESTICATION OF ORDERS SINCE THE ONSET OF REGISTRY FROM THE STATE(s) OF ORIGIN, INCLUDING ADMINISTRATIVE MISCONDUCT AND FRAUD IN ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA Sent: Tue, Feb 9, 2016 11:52:07 PM From: Sheila Shaw ; To: whistleblower@oighud.gov ; Subject: Fw: PATTERNS OF EMPLOYEE VIOLATIONS CF-180-4: OPERATING PROCEDURE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE FAMILY/LEGAL PROBLEMS - CASES NOTES -50 STATE TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT PROCESS: http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/child-support-process-administrative-vs-judicial.aspx ADMINISTRATIVE MISCONDUCT, MISUSE OF OFFICE - A PATTERN OF INSTITUTIONAL RACISM, UNCONSCIONABLE DELAYS AND RESERVES IN A MIXED RACIAL CASE HISTORY AND HISTORICAL DATA, IVD CASES AND FOREIGN DOMESTICATION OF ORDERS SINCE THE ONSET OF REGISTRY FROM THE STATE(s) OF ORIGIN, INCLUDING ADMINISTRATIVE MISCONDUCT AND FRAUD IN ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA Sent: Wed, Dec 16, 2015 10:27:09 PM Sheila Jocelyn Shaw http://professsorshaw.blogspot.com/ On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 9:02 AM, Sheila Shaw wrote: From: Sheila Shaw ; To: info@EverestCares.com ; Subject: FAMILY/LEGAL PROBLEMS - CASES NOTES -50 STATE TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT PROCESS: http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/child-support-process-administrative-vs-judicial.aspx ADMINISTRATIVE MISCONDUCT, MISUSE OF OFFICE - A PATTERN OF INSTITUTIONAL RACISM, UNCONSCIONABLE DELAYS AND RESERVES IN A MIXED RACIAL CASE HISTORY AND HISTORICAL DATA, IVD CASES AND FOREIGN DOMESTICATION OF ORDERS SINCE THE ONSET OF REGISTRY FROM THE STATE(s) OF ORIGIN, INCLUDING ADMINISTRATIVE MISCONDUCT AND FRAUD IN ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA Sent: Sat, Dec 12, 2015 12:32:08 PM AGGRAVATED WHITE COLLAR CRIME- MULTIPLE WHITE COLLAR CRIMINAL INCIDENTS CIRCUMVENTING ORANGE COUNTY FLORIDA CASE REGISTRIES- CHILD SUPPORT, CHILD CUSTODY (http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/model-domestic-violence-law-enforcement.html) (http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/08/aggravated-white-collar-criminal.html) (http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/pa-cases-historical-data-from-he-sate.html) (http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/07/absent-notice-of-related-cases-as.html) (http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/07/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer.html) You cannot use information available to you because of your job, but not available to the public, for your personal benefit or for the benefit of others. § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § 775.085 Enhances penalty for crimes evidencing "prejudice based on the race, color, ancestry, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, mental or physical disability, or advanced age of the victim. The duty to report misconduct is one of the ethical duties imposed on attorneys in the United States by the rules governing professional responsibility http://www.iape.org/index.php http://definitions.uslegal. com/w/willful-professional- misconduct/ Rule 8.3—Reporting Professional Misconduct (a) A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, shall inform the appropriate professional authority. (b) A lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for office shall inform the appropriate authority. (c) This rule does not require disclosure of information otherwise protected by Rule 1.6 or other law. http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309048893 Cases 2005-DR-014270-O (Paternity) P I I Lead Attorneys Petitioner SHAW, SHEILA J BARBARA FANCHER(LIMITED) JONES, Esquire Retained 407-849-1133(W) Respondent GONZALEZ, CARLOS A RUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire Retained 407-786-2889(W) E & O C & O C DISPOSITIONS 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 2004 OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS 01/01/ Case Reassigned to Division 2007 Case Reassigned to Division|CASE REASSIGNED TO JUDGE 38 02/11/ Notice 2005 Notice|NOTICE OF CONCLUSION OF REPRESENTATION 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 2004 Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing|FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL AFTER HEARING RECORDED COMPLAINT FORWARED TO THE ATTORNEY CONSUMER ASSISTANT PROGRAM (ACAP) REGARDING MISCONDUCT-OMISSION, ETHNIC BIASES CONVEYED IN CASE HISTORIES PERPETUATING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. RELATED CASES - PRINCIPAL JUDICIAL OR PROFESSION MISCONDUCT-FRAUD ON THE COURTS- PERSONAL AND BUSINESS TORT RELATED-ADVERSARIAL TORTS OR MATERNAL INJURIES WITH INTENT http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer_29.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/any-police-department-receiving-federal.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/family-violence-prevention-act-victim.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/false-cpi-personal-torts-tort-of-fraud.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/jarrid-williams-probation-dc-346801.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/201 Federal laws Federal law 42 U.S.C. § 5772 & 42 U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5772) defines a "missing child" as "any individual less than 18 years of age whose whereabouts are unknown to such individual"s legal custodian." RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. 827.03 Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; penalties.— intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child; or (c) Active encouragement of any person to commit an act that results or could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child. A person who knowingly or willfully abuses a child without causing great bodily harm, http://definitions.uslegal. com/w/willful-professional- misconduct PRINCIPAL CASES - HOME STATE ORIGIN INDIANA REGISTER OF ACTIONS CASE NO. 1993-CF-008458-AO cases: OC9901243 PA cases OC9901243 and 02-83719047104532 PA Cause number 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL 2010-DP 1170 FL INDIANA CASE NUMBERS Paternity case file no J18720 filed 11-16-71/11-24-71 order date Shirley Ann Shaw/Claude R. Jackson mariired December 31st, 1978 marriage license number CDR-94-114 Shirley Ann Shaw Joseph Nikolaenko marriage ended June 30, 1995 Buddmeeks Ctr Domestic case DCM-91-6993 1991 marriage license number 02D01-9707-ML-001399 07/08/97 married on 07/26/1997 DOB 04/21/46 Joseph Nikolaenko mother Michlaina Nikolaenko 5012 Pacer Run Ft. Wayne, IN Gwedolyn Ann Brown DOB 04/12/60 son Tyrese Dartanvan Brown father Thomas Lewis Brown mother Mary Lee Spann 3054 Schele Ave Ft. Wayne, IN Dorothy Jackson Claude Jackson married July 2, 1983 Divorce petition 02C01-9110-D1-1313 CDR-91-1313 "...Additionally, whether substantive or procedural misconduct is the basis for the sanction, the trial court must hold an evidentiary hearing before dismissing a case with prejudice,8 and must make an express finding that the conduct forming the basis for the dismissal was willful or done in bad faith or was deliberate and in contumacious disregard of the court’s authority.9 Appellate courts do not hesitate to reverse and remand for noncompliance with these requirements. Substantive misconduct is and should be subject to less tolerance before dismissal with prejudice is warranted. Lying about facts central to the case, including the nature and extent of one’s own injuries, simply cannot be tolerated and, frequently, cannot be remedied by any lesser sanction than dismissal with prejudice." Cases: administrative misconduct, judicial misconduct issues circumventing TITLE 42 SECTIONS 666 AND 654, 657 COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION CITATION FROM THE FEDERAL STATUTE OF THE US CODE § 657. Distribution of collected support 50 STATE TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT PROCESS http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/child-support-process-administrative-vs-judicial.aspx Child support orders can be established by the courts or by an administrative entity. In the administrative process, the state child support agency, also referred to as the IV-D agency, establishes the support order, usually without a hearing. In the judicial process, the court sets the order. Many states use a hybrid, or quasi-judicial process, which incorporates some judicial elements mixed with administrative processes. For example, many states may use an administrative forum, such as an attorney general’s office, but may incorporate a judicial element, such as an attorney. The three elements that determine where a process falls on the administrative/judicial continuum are 1) the forum used, 2) presiding officer, and 3) attorney involvement. The forum used simply means where the child support order is processed. Forums can include a courtroom, an administrative office of the court, the offices of an executive branch division such as the office of administrative hearings or attorney general’s office, the IV-D umbrella agency, or the IV-D agency itself. The presiding officer is the person who is in charge of supervising and running the process. Attorney involvement refers to whether or not an attorney represents the IV-D agency during the process. A state with a highly judicial process is one in which the forum used is a courtroom, the presiding officer is a judge, and the IV-D agency is represented by an attorney. States may be quasi-judicial, which means that the forum used may be a courtroom, but instead of a judge presiding, it may be a hearing officer who oversees the process. It is difficult to categorize states as fully judicial or fully administrative as the process differs depending on the type of order being processed. For example, there may be different processes for contested (challenged) and uncontested orders. Cases 2002-DR-050423-1 SHAW, SHEILA J 03/0912002 VS, COLEMAN, Family JIMMY L Income Deduction 0 Closed - Non SRS 2002-DR-006249-0 SHAW, SHEILA J 04124/2002 Paternity vs. GONZALEZ, Div 38 Closed - SRS CARLOS A Kest, Sally D M SHAW, SHEILA 08/29/2005 Paternity DOR JOCELYN VS. Div42 Re-Closed GONZALEZ, Evans, Robert M CARLOS ALBERTO SHAW, SHEILA 01/06/2010 Child Support DOR JOCELYN Div 42 Reopened Other KARENA vs. Evans, Robert M WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN SHAW, SHEILA 04112/2011 Domestic Violence w JOCELYN VS. Div 44 Closed - SRS WILLIAMS, JARRID Jordan, John E DESHAUN 2005-DR-014270-0 2010-DR-000170-0 2011-0R-006367-0 CIRCUMVENTING COMPLAINTS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND ENFORCEMENT UNDER (1) CIVIL ACTIONS BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SEC. 2000e-6. [Section 707] (a) Complaint... (2) STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CF OPERATING PROCEDURE CHILDREN AND FAMILIES NO. 180-4 TALLAHASSEE, October 29, 2007 Inspector General MANDATORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL (3) The following is an abstract from the Administration for Children and Families' website and the Administration for Child Support Enforcement, both of which publish all statutory guidelines for the collection of child support and payments thereof to the recipient. collection and distribution of child support payments Within this site it is defined as follows Frequently Asked Questions about Child Support Collection/Distribution For answers to questions about your own case, you need to check with your local or state child support office. State CSE agency telephone numbers and addresses are at (English):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ directories/ext/IVd_list.cfm (Spanish):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ directories/ext/Espanol_IVd_ list.cfm State CSE agency web site links are on our web site at the following location: http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/ programs/cse/extinf.htm#exta The following general information may be helpful: If the state collects more in a month than is to be paid to the family for their current and past due support, the rest of the money can be used to repay the state and federal governments for cash assistance * AFDC or TANF * that a family received. Also, child support agencies can recover all or part of the costs of their services from people who are not in a cash assistance program. These can include the cost of legal work done by agency attorneys or the costs of locating a parent, for example. The money may be deducted from the child support payment, or it may be collected from the noncustodial parent. For more information on changes in the law and how they may affect you, as well as the cost recovery practices of your State, you should contact your State child support enforcement agency. atty general complaint sent regarding misconduct( SAME ATTORNEY SAME FIRM WITH KNOWLEDGE OF PRIOR CASES-http://www.avvo.com/attorneys/32803-fl-ana-tangelrodriguez-1255736.html)/Duty to Report Lawyer Misconduct--Duty to Supervise--Responsibilities of Members of Law Firm Management Committees; These statutes include: Section 210401 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (Police Misconduct Provision), 42 U.S.C. § 14141, which authorizes the Department to file suit challenging a pattern or practice of misconduct by law enforcement officers (or employees of any governmental agency with responsibility for the administration of juvenile justice or the incarceration of juveniles) that deprives persons of constitutional or federal statutory rights; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., which prohibits recipients of federal financial assistance (including law enforcement agencies) from discriminating on the basis of race, color, (18 usc 2326)REAL CASES VS. MALICIOUS PROSECUTION/IMPLICATION http://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-publications/working-group-reports/intellectual-property-and-tech/19980128_Telemarketing_Fraud.pdf (http://www.nvo.com/beaulier/deadbeatparentspunishmentact/ ATTACHED DOCUMENTATION OF THE STATUTORY GUIDELINES) whereas there was exhibited criminal non support by the Respondent, Carlos Alberto Gonzales, is defined as willfully, knowingly and with specific intent did evade a financial acknowledgement and affidavit which was signed as of March of 2005 (willfulness is a " knowing and intentional violation of a known legal duty.") The level of proof for a criminal non-support action is "beyond a reasonable doubt". This means that the prosecutor must be able to see a high level of evidence of: the identity of the absent parent/defendant, the absent parent/defendant's ability to pay the amount of support ordered, and the lack of payments made. ...A parent commits the crime of nonsupport if such parent knowingly fails to provide, without good cause, adequate support which such parent is legally obligated to provide for his child or stepchild who is not otherwise emancipated by operation of law. Criminal nonsupport is a class A misdemeanor, unless the person obligated to pay child support commits the crime of nonsupport in each of six individual months within any twelve-month period, or the total arrearage is in excess of five thousand dollars, in either of which case it is a class D felony in some states. Deadbeat Parent Punishment Act , making non-support in some interstate cases a federal felony offense RE: Abuse of process complaint filed against Dr. Grove re: Isis Shaw Fwd: PRACTITIONER OF RECORD ON FILE THE DATE OF ALLEGED KIDNAPPING & MISSING PERSONS COMPLAINT 02/03/2011 BY FELICIA HANDLEY Fwd: caught.net AFFIDAVIT ATTACHED REGARDING POLICE MISCONDUCT Re: color of law violations Florida statutes 112/medicaid identification number for Isis neonatal records Fwd: WRIT OF HABAES CORPUS CONTESTING CUSTODY ORDER 2003 FL title XLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 The act contains 11 titles, or sections, ranging from additional corporate board responsibilities to criminal penalties, and requires the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to implement rulings on requirements to comply with the law. Harvey Pitt, the 26th chairman of the SEC, led the SEC in the adoption of dozens of rules to implement the Sarbanes–Oxley Act. It created a new, quasi-public agency, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, charged with overseeing, regulating, inspecting and disciplining accounting firms in their roles as auditors of public companies http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarbanes%E2%80%93Oxley_Act http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/migrated/cpr/mrpc/MRPCSubjectGuide.authcheckdam.pdf http://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/model_rules_of_professional_conduct_table_of_contents.html Case notes: (1) http://divorce.lovetoknow.com/National_Deadbeat_Dad_List Federal Child Support Laws There are two federal child support laws that dictate what can and should be done with fathers who aren't paying child support. The Child Support Recovery Act The Child Support Recovery Act of 1992 prescribes misdemeanor penalties for parents who fail to pay child support. For a court to levy these penalties, the parent must be required by a court order to pay child support, and there must be documented evidence of said parent's failure to pay. The Deadbeat Parents Punishment Act The Deadbeat Parents Punishment Act of 1998 prescribes felony punishments for nonpaying parents who cross state lines in an attempt to evade making child support payments. For prosecution, multiple state's law enforcement and child support agencies work together to locate and return the nonpaying parent to the state in which he owes child support. For prosecution, the nonpaying parent must owe more than $5,000, be able to pay the overdue support, have intentionally not made required payments and have crossed state lines to avoid making payments. State-Level Enforcement Financial support is considered the right of the child and not the parent. Therefore, child support failure-to-pay proceedings are managed by each state's child support enforcement agency on behalf of the child and child support laws vary from one state to another. Some agencies will assist you with obtaining a court order declaring the child's right to financial support, while others require that you complete this step on your own. Historical data is indicative of non cooperation by the nonparents, no punitive father action toward meeting financial obligation or statutory code. Jarrid Deshaun Williams, attempted to fabricate medical records and did in fact obstruct medical care with intent to inflict personal injury as a means of punishment and discredit the mother’s care of her daughter, omitted case history within DCF records include:absent advance directives from practitioners of which the child was a patient 9457320158 (RFA CASE NUMBER 1143172973) Mental cruelty was exhibited, a pattern of abuse that the primary residential parents, Jarrid Deshaun Williams and Carlos Alberto Gonzalez, maintained for a period of more than six months, throughout attempts to arbitrate on terms of mutual civility which was unattainable and my entitled rights, as the mother,natural parent, those inalienable rights were restrained from me causing gross infliction of intentional personal mental distress and mental cruelty towards the children and myself by the biological fathers after the fathers had maintained several years of nonsupport and absent contribution towards the child’s mental and financial well being as illustrated in court proceedings in division 42, Orange County, Florida. The behavior of which the attempted direction of arbitration was directed towards the mother as retaliatory behavior due to previous attempts to collect child support over several years regarding Michyl Jacob E. Shaw and Isis Jashuana C. J. Shaw. Extensive days and hours of obstructed communication and visitation with children through arbitration methods and as discussed with the fathers on several occasions to again fabricate mental distress alleged in a third party complaint, that the fathers did in fact intentional create situations to deny communication with intent to retaliate and create offensive behavior situations with third parties. Regarding the precipitating child support arrears hearing, in the Carlos Alberto Gonzalez case on 02/14/2011, to include Division and Judicial Representative Heard in Division 42, Ninth Circuity, Orange County, Orlando, Florida 32801 Judicial Hearing Officer: George Winslow, in Division 42 Judge Evans;division 42 case number changed, Case No 02DR6249 NOW 05-17420, regarding principal criminal judicial criminal activity to aid/assist criminal nonsupport George Winslow Regarding delayed child support, the employer/income deduction order modification,the amount of child support set at $30.69 per week due to unemployment, in the case of Jarrid Deshaun Williams, had not been adjusted or set at COLA as of the 11th day of February of 2010 when the order setting non jury trial for matters of paternity, F.S. 742.10 Establishment of paternity for children born out of wedlock. it was set on the 1st day of April of 2010, whereas the child’s date of birth for Isis Jashauna Camirin Jewel Shaw is the 29th day of January of 2007, a period of more than three years prior to the date the child support order was entered during which time the non-parent was unemployed. The mother, Dr. Sheila Jocelyn Karena Shaw, had been supporting the child from post- delivery including medical insurance payments that until April 30th of 2011 were solely in the mother’s name and responsibility, a post delivery bill of$ 9780 from Winnie Palmer Hospital, Orlando, Florida, of which the non-parent has refused to make payments towards aside from all other responsibilities incurred prior, and post-delivery. A writ of habas corpus, as defined in chapters 32 and 90-92.11 F.S., causes for immediate action and remedy by the court for violations of those rights and liberties, that are fundamental and should be enforced by law enforcement agencies, of which precedent case laws regarding child support obligations, visitations and the rights of the mother were infracted statutory code. Attached are the letters and review dates regarding an adjustment hearing of the order child-support , for Isis Jashauna Camirin Jewel Shaw, set on April 1st of 2010. Statutory Codes including The Parental Rights Amendment of the federal Constitution and the Florida State Constitution section 23 (complaint regarding violations of privacy provisions, privacy rights) 92.02-92.15, 92.19 temporary custody must meet constitutional test, the non-parent must demonstrate that he has met punitative father actions, paternity obligations including financial support, (Purpose) The writ of habas corpos is being filed in this case regarding use of a writ of habas corpos "whereas the parent has been deprived of their fundamental rights, fundamental liberty, interest of natural parents, in the the care, custody and management of their children without due process, precedent case; Santosky v. Bernhardt S. Karmer, 455 U.S.745 (1982) Whereas the court dockets of division 42, family court matters clear and visibly shows that the non-parent had not met demonstrative constitutional test regarding financial obligations and that pre-screening was inadequate,and there was manipulation of records including child support obligations, require program health records including neonatal medical records to date health practitioner records required for DCF programs including 4C childcare applications, program participation requirements, that those records where not presented in case number DP1140 intentionally towards the benefit of the non-parent and that administrative powers had not been enforced in collection of punitative father obligations when they could have been availed to prevent unconscionable delay in application,enforcement without judicial action. (2)Case No 02DR6249 NOW 05-17420 WRIT COMPLAINT AGAINST GEORGE WINSLOW, JR., JUDICIAL HEARING OFFICER, NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT CASE NO DR-05-14270, COMPLAINT AGAINST CLAUDIA HERNADEZ FW: your ltr to counsel FW: nonparents Cases/Clerk of Court Fw: FL Statutes 90.21-90.35 DCF administrative powers(92.02-92.15, 92.19) FW: case no DP1140Writs/COLOR OF LAW COMPLAINTS Title VI of the Civil Rights Act states that "No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance." In February 1994, President Clinton issued Executive Order 12898, "Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations." In a separate memorandum, President Clinton identified Title VI as one of several federal laws already in existence that can help "to prevent minority communities and low-income communities from being subject to disproportionately high and adverse environmental effects." There are several basic differences between EPA's responsibilities under Title VI and under Executive Order 12898: Title VI Title VI prohibits recipients of federal financial assistance (e.g., states, universities, local governments) from discriminating on the basis of race, color, or national origin in their programs or activities. Title VI is a federal law that applies to federal financial assistance recipients (i.e., persons or entities that receive EPA financial assistance) and not to EPA itself as the Executive Order does. Title VI allows persons to file administrative complaints with the federal departments and agencies that provide financial assistance alleging discrimination based on race, color, or national origin by recipients of federal funds. Under Title VI, EPA has a responsibility to ensure that its funds are not being used to subsidize discrimination based on race, color, or national origin. This prohibition against discrimination under Title VI has been a statutory mandate since 1964 and EPA has had Title VI regulations since 1973. EPA's Office of Civil Rights is responsible for the Agency's administration of Title VI, including investigation of such DIVISION 42 CASE NUMBER CHANGED Case No 02DR6249 NOW 05-17420 Fw: REGARDING "PRINCIPAL"CRIMINAL JUDICAL CRIMINAL ACTIVITY TO AID/ASSIST CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT George Winslow Trial or Ajudication Errors Dates of Petitioner Responding are inaccurate, date extends from February 14th 2011, February 15th, 2011 March 28th,20100 (10 days after initial hearing date) not September 12, 2011. intentional mis-statement of the date entered for reason of subsequent initiation of another case involving the minor Mockery of the law-implied Veil of Ignorance regarding formation of the law Manipulation of records, Florida Statute 112, Change in case numbers whereas there was is a "highly visible" evidenced by court dockets and records retained by DCF illustrating no support order until one was entered in November of 2010 also records retained by the local Orange County OCSE office. from the acknowledgement of paternity to date of order was more than ten years regarding the age of the child whereas the minor's age, as a minority disability should have expedited a response time that no voluntary action on behalf the father was made, No inquiry or evidenced was made to the father regarding any payments of such which were not made Abuse of discretionary free will or exercise of legal authority and lack of impartial judgement by George Winslow, Jr. specific performane of which the law was intended regarding financial obligation unconcionable delay in entering a current support order, retroactive child support order, or administrative remedy regarding arrears, the child's entitlement to equal enforcement of the laws available and applied Uniform Laws Case No 02DR6249 Once paternity is established legally, a child gains legal rights and privileges If the father is willing to sign documents to acknowledge paternity and agree to support, then enforcement can proceed by an income withholding order. The Respondent requested genetic testing, whereas the results were submitted to the court, and the biological father. Establishing paternity establishes a financial commitment from the father to the child Criminal Nonsupport (568.040) Criminal nonsupport is defined as knowingly fails to provide, without good cause, adequate support for his spouse; a parent commits the crime of nonsupport if such parent knowingly fails to provide, without good cause, adequate support which such parent is legally obligated to provide for his child or stepchild who is not otherwise emancipated by operation of law. Criminal nonsupport is a class A misdemeanor, unless the person obligated to pay child support commits the crime of nonsupport in each of six individual months within any twelve-month period, or the total arrearage is in excess of five thousand dollars, in either of which case it is a class D felony. 1. A criminal non-support action may be filed either as a misdemeanor or a felony offense Misdemeanor, 1st degree Criteria: fails to provide adequate support, and ability to pay based on evidence presented to county Prosecutor. Decision to prosecute is made by the county Prosecutor Penalties: Maximum $1000.00 fine Maximum six months jail time Felony, 4th degree Criteria: Absent parent/defendant has previously plead guilty or been convicted of felony non-support Penalties: O.R.C., section 2929.11 Maximum $2500.00 fine Maximum 5 years in prison Felony, 5th degree Criteria: absent parent/defendant has previously plead guilty or been convicted of misdemeanor non-support, or if the arrearage is equal to the amount of support ordered for an accumulated period of 26 weeks out of 104 consecutive weeks Penalties: O.R.C., section 2929.11 Maximum $2500.00 fine Maximum 5 years in prison 2. Level of Proof The level of proof for a criminal non-support action is "beyond a reasonable doubt". This means that the prosecutor must be able to see a high level of evidence of: the identity of the absent parent/defendant, the absent parent/defendant's ability to pay the amount of support ordered, and the lack of payments made. 3. Venue Location where the crime occurred. The crime is the lack of payments being made to the child , so cases are normally filed in the county where the custodial parent and child or children reside. Personal jurisdiction over the absent parent/defendant required: long arm jurisdiction over the absent parent, the absent parent is still in Ohio, making local service of a summons or warrant possible, or it becomes possible to serve the absent parent/defendant with a summons or warrant while that person is physically in Ohio, even for a short period of time. (3) Central Region Karlene Cole-Palmer CLS Regional Director Children’s Legal Services Department of Children and Families 400 West Robinson Street, Suite S1114 Orlando, Florida 32801 Office: (407) 245-0530 E-mail: Karlene_Cole-Palmer@dcf.state.fl.us Karlene Cole-Palmer, I spoke with John Hammet regarding the inquiry your agency's CPI made when she called my mother, Shirley Ann Shaw-Wetzel, (formerly Shirley Ann Shaw-Nikolaenko), whereas she inquired about my academic credentials, title, and if I had any history of mental illness ill respective to any proper investigative measures, an act of negligence, and very offensively as well as ignorantly stated in belief as to whether my educational background was valid. None of which is relative to the lack of contact that should have been made to the Orange County School Board Division of Home Education and Principal regarding the facts of Orange County District Schools, government supervised programs or nonjurisdictional programs, school choice, parental choice or dual enrollment programs, again none of which was brought to the juvenile court proceeds or information that was intentionally with knowledge omitted from proceeding during which false statement were made against myself the children's mother. Again absent neonatal child advance directives from practitioners and daycare providers of which mandatory reporting guidelines are a policy in reporting any child abuse and neglect, none (childwelfare.gov and https://www.childwelfare.gov/responding/mandated.cfm) The following complaint detail further information regarding my complaint. DCF John Hammett program administer 4075632381 RE: the most recent contact from the Orlando area CPI 2002-DR-050423-1 SHAW, SHEILA J 03/0912002 VS, COLEMAN, Family JIMMY L Income Deduction 0 Closed - Non SRS 2002-DR-006249-0 SHAW, SHEILA J 04124/2002 Paternity vs. GONZALEZ, Div 38 Closed - SRS CARLOS A Kest, Sally D M SHAW, SHEILA 08/29/2005 Paternity DOR JOCELYN VS. Div42 Re-Closed GONZALEZ, Evans, Robert M CARLOS ALBERTO SHAW, SHEILA 01/06/2010 Child Support DOR JOCELYN Div 42 Reopened Other KARENA vs. Evans, Robert M WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN SHAW, SHEILA 04112/2011 Domestic Violence w JOCELYN VS. Div 44 Closed - SRS WILLIAMS, JARRID Jordan, John E DESHAUN 2005-DR-014270-0 2010-DR-000170-0 2011-0R-006367-0 previous CPI complaint regarding Felicia Handley was forwarding regarding her malicious lie to obtain court venue to not only commit a hate crime but to commit fraud on the court and exploit the children in the aforementioned cases ALL REPRESENTING PARTIES HAD ACCESS TO THE FLORIDA ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF THE COURT REGISTERS OF ACTION, A DUTY OF CARE HIGHER THAN THAT OF THE OTHER PARTIES, AND WITH KNOWLEDGE AND INTENT TO OMIT INFORMATION THAT WOULD HAVE ELIMINATED SOME OF THE BIASEDNESS THE JUDGE HELD DUE TO FELICIA HANDLEY'S FALSE KIDNAPPING COMPLAINT WHICH SHE STATED AFTER PROCEEDING HAD BEEN DISMISSED ON JANUARY 28TH, 2011 IN JUDGE ANTHONY'S COURT ROOM IN THE JUVENILE COURT. WITHIN A MATTER OF DAYS FELICIA HANDLEY COMES BACK TO THE JUVENILE COURT WITH A MALICIOUS LIE THAT THE CHILDREN WERE IN SOMEONE ELSE'S CUSTODY WHEN IN FACT THE COURT HAD HEARD THE INITIAL ALLEGATIONS AND THE CHILDREN WERE RETURNED HOME WITH THE MOTHER UNTIL WHICH A TEMPORARY CUSTODY ORDER AFTER THE ALLEGATIONS WAS ISSUED ON FEBRUARY 4TH, 2011 TO ABATE LEGAL REPRESENTATION FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (IRS) OCSE OFFICE AND ATTORNEYS OF WHOM THE SAME REPRESENTATION IS INDICATIVE IN THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT OF THE ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS, ROOM 150. Lawyers holding public office assume legal responsibilities going beyond those of other citizens. A lawyer's abuse of public office can suggest an inability to fulfill the professional role of attorney. The same is true of abuse of positions of private trust such as trustee, executor, administrator, guardian, or agent and officer, director, or manager of a corporation or other organization http://www.floridabar.org/DIVCOM/JN/JNJournal01.nsf/c0d731e03de9828d852574580042ae7a/7ee566f4f7305b2085256e24006a34b6!OpenDocument&Highlight=0,disability* The basic standards governing fraud on the court are reasonably straightforward. As set forth in Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998): The requisite fraud on the court occurs where “it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.” Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989) . . . . The trial court has the inherent authority, within the exercise of sound judicial discretion, to dismiss an action when a plaintiff has perpetrated a fraud on the court, or where a party refuses to comply with court orders. Kornblum v. Schneider, 609 So. 2d 138, 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

http://www.ethics.state.fl.us/Documents/Ethics/ArticleIISec8.html

Fw: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw Me to misconductcontact@floridadjqc.com & 9 moreSent Sheila Jocelyn Shaw http://professsorshaw.blogspot.com/ --- On Thu, 4/28/16, Sheila Shaw wrote: > From: Sheila Shaw > Subject: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw: prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct > To: ovw.info@usdoj.gov > Date: Thursday, April 28, 2016, 3:02 PM > --- On Thu, 4/28/16, Sheila Shaw > > wrote: > > > From: Sheila Shaw > > Subject: prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct > > To: contact@nwc.org > > Cc: "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "judicial misconduct" , > "Misconduct president" , > "police misconduct" , > "police misconduct" , > "police misconduct" > > Date: Thursday, April 28, 2016, 2:54 PM > > > > > > VAWA REPORT REGARDING NOT ONLY ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT IN > CHILD > > CUSTODY MODIFICATION > > Intentionally omitted criminal nonsupport, offensive > > behaviour, professional misconduct and ethnic > biasedness, > > child exploitation and institutional racism > > Title 42 section 42 1983, 14141 attorney prosecutorial > child > > custody exploitation including false statements never > heard > > throughout case trial activity, false statements to > commence > > proceedings > > > > > > Case Type: > > Paternity > > Date Filed: > > 4/24/2002 > > Location: > > Div 38 > > UCN: > > 482002DR006249A001OX > > Judge: > > Patricia A Doherty > > Status: > > Closed - SRS > > Date Description Pages Doc > > Request > > Doc > > 7/10/2013 Letter 12 > > 3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address 1 > > > > > 1/1/2007 Case Reassigned to Division > > > > > 2/11/2005 Notice > > 11/10/2004 Final Order of Dismissal After > Hearing > > > > 11/10/2004 Final Order of Dismissal After > Hearing > > > > 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Smith, > Maura T > > > > 9/24/2004 Court Minutes > > 9/24/2004 Affidavit > > 9/13/2004 Pluries Summons Unserved > > > > > 7/28/2004 Pluries Summons Served > > > > > 7/27/2004 Notice of Hearing > > > 7/16/2004 Motion to Dismiss > > > 7/14/2004 Notice of Unavailability > > > > > 7/14/2004 Notice Appearance of Counsel > > > > > 7/1/2004 Affidavit of Lost/Destroyed Instrument > > > > 7/1/2004 Pluries Summons Issued > > > > > 4/16/2004 Pluries Summons Issued > > > > > 1/6/2004 Returned Mail > > 12/26/2003 Certificate of Mailing > > > > 12/26/2003 Affidavit > > 12/26/2003 Notice of Action Issued > > > > > 10/13/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved > > > > > 9/12/2003 Pluries Summons Issued > > > > > 9/3/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved > > > > 9/3/2003 Affidavit > > 9/3/2003 Motion > > 9/3/2003 Motion for Default > > > 9/3/2003 Affidavit > > 9/3/2003 Motion > > 9/3/2003 Motion for Default > > > 8/4/2003 Pluries Summons Issued > > > > > 7/31/2003 Request for Admissions > > > > > 6/9/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved > > > > 5/21/2003 Pluries Summons Issued > > > > > 5/1/2003 Third Party Summons > > > 2/11/2003 Pluries Summons Issued > > > > > 12/26/2002 Pluries Summons Served > > > > 11/8/2002 Pluries Summons Issued > > > > > 9/24/2002 Pluries Summons Unserved > > > > > 8/30/2002 Pluries Summons Issued > > > > > 7/29/2002 Summons Returned > > > 7/3/2002 Alias Summons Issued > > > 5/15/2002 Summons Returned > > > 4/24/2002 Summons Issued > > 4/24/2002 Affidavit of Non Military Service > > > > > 4/24/2002 Request for Admissions > > > > > 4/24/2002 Affidavit of Need > > > 4/24/2002 Certificate of Compliance > > > > > 4/24/2002 Financial Affidavit > > > 4/24/2002 Civil Cover Sheet > > > 4/24/2002 Petition > > 4/24/2002 Initial Judge Assigned > > > > Case Type: > > Paternity DOR > > Date Filed: > > 8/29/2005 > > Location: > > Div 42 > > UCN: > > 482005DR014270A001OX > > Judge: > > Heather P Rodriguez > > Status: > > Re-Closed > > Citation Number: > > Date Description Pages Doc > > Request > > Doc > > 3/3/2016 Returned Mail 3 > > 2/11/2016 Order Denying 2 > > 2/11/2016 Order Denying 2 > > 4/14/2015 Motion to Vacate 10 > > > 4/14/2015 Notice 3 > > 7/3/2013 Letter 5 > > 3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address 1 > > > > > 8/7/2012 Letter 11 > > 5/15/2012 Order Denying 1 > > 5/7/2012 Birth Certificate 1 > > > 5/7/2012 Motion 107 > > 5/7/2012 Civil Cover Sheet 2 > > > 4/2/2012 Notice of Change of Address 1 > > > > > 4/2/2012 Motion 74 > > 12/5/2011 Letter 3 > > 11/14/2011 Notice of Change of Address 1 > > > > 9/19/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & > Order > > 2 > > 9/14/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 > > > > 9/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 > > > > 9/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 > > > > 4/6/2011 Returned Mail 2 > > 3/30/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & > Order > > 3 > > 3/28/2011 Child Support Information Sheet > 1 > > > > 3/28/2011 Certified Notice of Delinquent > Support > > 1 > > 3/28/2011 Notice to Depository 1 > > > > > 3/28/2011 Supplemental Financial Statement > 1 > > > > 3/28/2011 Court Minutes 1 > > 3/28/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George > > > > > 3/22/2011 Returned Mail 2 > > 3/11/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment 1 > > > > 2/24/2011 Notice of Change of Address 1 > > > > > 2/24/2011 Memorandum 7 > > 2/24/2011 Copy/Copies 6 > > 2/23/2011 Answer 6 > > 2/18/2011 Alias Summons Returned Served > 5 > > > > 2/17/2011 Final Order 1 > > 2/14/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George > > > > > 1/14/2011 Returned Mail 2 > > 1/4/2011 Notice of Hearing 1 > > > 1/4/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment 1 > > > > > 11/29/2010 Notice of Change of Address 1 > > > > 10/22/2010 Order for Income Deduction 1 > > > > > 10/22/2010 Report/Recommendation and Final > Judgment > > 4 > > 10/19/2010 Court Minutes 1 > > > 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) 2 > > 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) 2 > > 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet > 2 > > > > 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet > 1 > > > > 10/19/2010 HEARING - Petition/Motion > > > > > 10/8/2010 Returned Mail 2 > > 9/20/2010 Order for Non Jury Trial 1 > > > > > 9/17/2010 Notice for Trial 1 > > > 8/12/2010 Response 2 > > 6/14/2010 Alias Summons Issued 4 > > > > > 4/9/2010 Summons Returned Unserved 5 > > > > > 12/17/2009 Summons Issued 4 > > > 12/17/2009 Certificate of Compliance 2 > > > > > 12/17/2009 Financial Affidavit 4 > > > > > 12/17/2009 Petition 4 > > 12/17/2009 Request for Admissions 1 > > > > > 11/1/2006 Notice of Change of Address > > > > > 9/28/2006 HRS673 to Bureau > > > 7/19/2006 Letter > > 7/19/2006 Letter > > 5/9/2006 Final Judgment > > 5/9/2006 Order for Income Deduction > > > > > 5/9/2006 Disposed by Non-Jury Trial > > > > > 5/9/2006 Final Judgment > > 5/8/2006 HRS673 to Bureau > > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, > Renee A > > > > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, > Renee A > > > > 4/28/2006 Affidavit > > 4/28/2006 Affidavit > > 4/28/2006 Court Minutes > > 3/29/2006 Order for Non Jury Trial > > > > > 3/29/2006 Notice of Hearing > > > 3/29/2006 Notice for Trial > > > 3/29/2006 Request to Produce > > > 3/28/2006 Request for Admissions > > > > > 3/28/2006 Notice of Filing HLA Tissue Typing > > > > > 2/9/2006 Notice > > 1/10/2006 HRS673 to Bureau > > > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, Renee > A > > > > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee > A > > > > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - > Deactivated, > > Deactivated > > 1/5/2006 Court Minutes > > 1/5/2006 Financial Affidavit > > > 1/5/2006 Child Support Information Sheet > > > > 1/5/2006 Child Support Information Sheet > > > > 12/6/2005 Notice of Hearing > > > 12/6/2005 Order for Non Jury Trial > > > > > 12/6/2005 Request to Produce > > > 12/6/2005 Notice for Trial > > > 12/5/2005 Answer > > 10/31/2005 Summons Returned > > > 10/31/2005 Summons Returned > > > 10/27/2005 Answer Denying Allegations > > > > > 8/29/2005 Summons Issued > > 8/29/2005 Request for Admissions > > > > > 8/29/2005 Certificate of Compliance > > > > > 8/29/2005 Financial Affidavit > > > 8/29/2005 Notice of Social Security > > > > > 8/29/2005 Civil Cover Sheet > > > 8/29/2005 Petition > > 8/29/2005 Initial Judge Assigned > > > > > > > > > VOR (Viewable on Request) > > Certain case documents contain sensitive or personally > > identifiable information that must be manually > redacted > > before they are viewable by the general public. > Documents > > listed in the Docket Events section as VOR are public > > documents that require further redaction by Clerk > staff > > before they can be viewed. Follow the steps below to > request > > access to these documents: > > > > Check the Request Doc checkbox for the document > you > > wish to view. You may repeat this for other VOR > documents on > > the same case. > > Once all document requests have been made for > this > > case, click the Submit button. A confirmation screen > will > > display, where you will be asked to enter or confirm > your > > email address to finalize your request. > > You will receive an initial email notification > to > > confirm your request, followed by additional email > > notifications as requested documents become available. > The > > Clerk’s office makes every effort to complete these > > requests in a timely manner. > > > > For definitions of document types, please refer to our > > glossary. > > Hearings > > Date Hearing Time Location > Pages > > Doc > > 3/28/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 > AM > > > > 2/14/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 > AM > > > > 10/19/2010 Petition/Motion 1:00 PM > > > > > 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 8:00 AM > > 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 8:00 AM > > 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 8:00 AM > > 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A > 8:00 > > AM > > 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 8:00 AM > > 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 8:00 AM > > 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 8:00 AM > > 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A > 8:00 > > AM > > 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A > 9:00 > > AM > > 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 9:00 AM > > 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 9:00 AM > > 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 9:00 AM > > 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A > 9:00 > > AM > > 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 9:00 AM > > 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 9:00 AM > > 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > > 9:00 AM > > > > > > > > Case Narrative > > > > "an act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere > with > > the orderly administration of justice, or to impair > the > > dignity of the court or respect for its authority. > There are > > two kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, > 128. > > direct contempt openly and in the presence of the > court, > > resists the power of the court, 102 A. 400, 406; and > > consequential, or constructive contempt results from > matters > > outside the court, such as failure to comply... MISUSE > OF > > OFFICE TO ENGAGE IN RACIAL PROFILING, FRAUD, AIDING > AND > > ABETTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT RECOVERY BY FALSE > ALLEGATIONS > > USED TO ABATE DEPARTMENTAL COLLECTION INTERVENTIONS ON > > BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT AND MOTHER TO CASES IN THE > FAMILY > > COURT, AND CHILD SUPPORT OCSE, AFFILIATED WITH FLORIDA > DCF > > DEPARTMENTAL RISS SYSTEM DATABASES ON FEBRUARY 4TH, > 2011 > > DURING WHICH TIME COURT DATES OR CONCURRENT > ENFORCEMENT > > ACTION WAS BEING UNDERGONE. CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. > 180-4 > > MANDATORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF > INSPECTOR > > GENERA #Employee Misconduct > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/03/7750844white-collar-crime-victim.html, > > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/12/you-cannot-use-information-available-to.html > > OIG Investigative and Law Enforcement Authority The > > Office of Inspector General (OIG), U.S. Department of > > Agriculture (USDA), was administratively established by > the > > Secretary of Agriculture in 1962 following a major > criminal > > fraud scandal affecting several agencies within USDA. > OIG > > was later legislatively established by Congress under > the > > Inspector General Act of 1978 (Public Law [P.L.] > 95-452), as > > amended. Pursuant to the Inspector General Act of 1978 > and > > Section 1337 of the Agriculture and Food Act of 1981 > (P.L. > > 97-98), OIG Investigations is the law enforcement arm > of the > > Department, with Department-wide investigative > jurisdiction. > > OIG Special Agents conduct investigations of > significant > > criminal activities involving USDA programs, > operations, and > > personnel, and are authorized to make arrests, execute > > warrants, and carry firearms. The types of > investigations > > conducted by OIG Special Agents involve criminal > activities > > such as frauds in subsidy, price support, benefits, > and > > insurance programs; significant thefts of Government > > property or funds; bribery; extortion; smuggling; and > > assaults on employees. Investigations involving > criminal > > activity that affects the health and safety of the > public, > > such as meat packers who knowingly sell hazardous food > > products and individuals who tamper with food regulated > by > > USDA, are also high-profile investigative priorities. > In > > addition, OIG Special Agents are poised to provide > emergency > > law enforcement response to USDA declared emergencies > and > > suspected incidents of terrorism affecting USDA > regulated > > industries, as well as USDA programs, operations, > personnel, > > and installations, in coordination with Federal, State, > and > > local law enforcement agencies, as appropriate. The > > enactment of the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food > and > > Drug Administration, and Related Agencies > Appropriations Act > > of 1996 (P.L. 104-37) authorized OIG to receive funds > and > > property through criminal and civil Federal forfeiture > > proceedings, and through equitable sharing of > forfeited > > funds and property controlled by the U.S. Department > of > > Justice. Forfeiture proceeds have severe restrictions > > mandated by statutes and U.S. Department of Justice > policy > > as to how they are used. Forfeiture funds cannot be > used in > > lieu of the OIG's regular appropriations. False CPI, > > PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida > > Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do > > concerning false reporting for children and Section > 415.111, > > F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. RE: CF > > OPERATING PROCEDURE (NO. 180-4 https://drive.google.com/folder/d/0B84_tgjFbXNLcUpfaDBSRHBSZDQ/editATORY > > REPORTING REQUIiREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR > > GENERAL Clearly outlines employee fraud and misconduct > > within the scope of cause f action by the Office of > the > > Inspector General within the Florida Departmentof > Children. > > § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE > AND > > FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 > 787.03 > > False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. > § > > 775.085) (complaint ACAP THE FLORIDA BAR INQUIRY > COMPLAINT > > FORM http://goo.gl/h9wjQr) http://www.dcf.state.fl.us/admin/ig/content/AR2013-14.pdf > > Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what > the > > department has to do concerning false reporting for > children > > and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses wdith false > reporting > > for adults. https://oig.justice.gov/hotline/contact-doj.htm cc: > > letter to OIG FL DCF Keith Parks Resending Complaint > > Attached Department form (complaint ACAP THE FLORIDA > BAR > > INQUIRY COMPLAINT FORM Fw: ATTN KEITH PARKS CONTINUING > > INSPECTOR GENERAL MANDATORY REPORTING TO IG OFFICE, > > MISCONDUCT COMPLAINT Aug 10, 2015, 12:19 PM § > 112.313(8), > > Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW > 2003 > > FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 False complaint > Fwd: > > ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § 775.085 Enhances > penalty > > for crimes evidencing "prejudice based on the race, > color, > > ancestry, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, > national > > origin, mental or physical disability, or advanced age > of > > the victim. The duty to report misconduct is one of > the > > ethical duties imposed on attorneys in the United > States by > > the rules governing professional responsibility http://www.iape.org/index.php http://definitions.uslegal. > com/w/willful-professional- > > misconduct/ Rule 8.3—Reporting Professional > Misconduct (a) > > A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a > > violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that > raises a > > substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, > > trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other > respects, > > shall inform the appropriate professional authority. > (b) A > > lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation > of > > applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a > > substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for > office > > shall inform the appropriate authority. (c) This rule > does > > not require disclosure of information otherwise > protected by > > Rule 1.6 or other law TITLE 42 SECTIONS 666 AND 654, > 657 > > COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION CITATION FROM THE FEDERAL > > STATUTE OF THE US CODE § 657. Distribution of > collected > > support 50 STATE T Me to infopitt@womenslawproject.org & 1 moreSent --- On Thu, 4/28/16, Sheila Shaw wrote: > From: Sheila Shaw > Subject: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw: prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct > To: local@tampabay.com > Date: Thursday, April 28, 2016, 3:26 PM > > > > VAWA REPORT REGARDING NOT ONLY ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT IN CHILD > CUSTODY MODIFICATION > Intentionally omitted criminal nonsupport, offensive > behaviour, professional misconduct and ethnic biasedness, > child exploitation and institutional racism > Title 42 section 42 1983, 14141 attorney prosecutorial child > chustody exploitation including false statements never heard > throughout case trial activity, false statements to commence > proceedings > > > Case Type: > Paternity > Date Filed: > 4/24/2002 > Location: > Div 38 > UCN: > 482002DR006249A001OX > Judge: > Patricia A Doherty > Status: > Closed - SRS > Date Description Pages Doc Request > Doc > 7/10/2013 Letter 12 > 3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address > 1 > 1/1/2007 Case Reassigned to Division > 2/11/2005 Notice > 11/10/2004 Final Order of Dismissal After > Hearing > 11/10/2004 Final Order of Dismissal After > Hearing > 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Smith, Maura > T > 9/24/2004 Court Minutes > 9/24/2004 Affidavit > 9/13/2004 Pluries Summons Unserved > 7/28/2004 Pluries Summons Served > 7/27/2004 Notice of Hearing > 7/16/2004 Motion to Dismiss > 7/14/2004 Notice of Unavailability > 7/14/2004 Notice Appearance of Counsel > 7/1/2004 Affidavit of Lost/Destroyed Instrument > > 7/1/2004 Pluries Summons Issued > 4/16/2004 Pluries Summons Issued > 1/6/2004 Returned Mail > 12/26/2003 Certificate of Mailing > 12/26/2003 Affidavit > 12/26/2003 Notice of Action Issued > 10/13/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved > 9/12/2003 Pluries Summons Issued > 9/3/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved > 9/3/2003 Affidavit > 9/3/2003 Motion > 9/3/2003 Motion for Default > 9/3/2003 Affidavit > 9/3/2003 Motion > 9/3/2003 Motion for Default > 8/4/2003 Pluries Summons Issued > 7/31/2003 Request for Admissions > 6/9/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved > 5/21/2003 Pluries Summons Issued > 5/1/2003 Third Party Summons > 2/11/2003 Pluries Summons Issued > 12/26/2002 Pluries Summons Served > 11/8/2002 Pluries Summons Issued > 9/24/2002 Pluries Summons Unserved > 8/30/2002 Pluries Summons Issued > 7/29/2002 Summons Returned > 7/3/2002 Alias Summons Issued > 5/15/2002 Summons Returned > 4/24/2002 Summons Issued > 4/24/2002 Affidavit of Non Military Service > > 4/24/2002 Request for Admissions > 4/24/2002 Affidavit of Need > 4/24/2002 Certificate of Compliance > 4/24/2002 Financial Affidavit > 4/24/2002 Civil Cover Sheet > 4/24/2002 Petition > 4/24/2002 Initial Judge Assigned > > Case Type: > Paternity DOR > Date Filed: > 8/29/2005 > Location: > Div 42 > UCN: > 482005DR014270A001OX > Judge: > Heather P Rodriguez > Status: > Re-Closed > Citation Number: > Date Description Pages Doc Request > Doc > 3/3/2016 Returned Mail 3 > 2/11/2016 Order Denying 2 > 2/11/2016 Order Denying 2 > 4/14/2015 Motion to Vacate 10 > 4/14/2015 Notice 3 > 7/3/2013 Letter 5 > 3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address > 1 > 8/7/2012 Letter 11 > 5/15/2012 Order Denying 1 > 5/7/2012 Birth Certificate 1 > 5/7/2012 Motion 107 > 5/7/2012 Civil Cover Sheet 2 > 4/2/2012 Notice of Change of Address > 1 > 4/2/2012 Motion 74 > 12/5/2011 Letter 3 > 11/14/2011 Notice of Change of Address > 1 > 9/19/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & > Order 2 > 9/14/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus > 9 > 9/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus > 9 > 9/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus > 9 > 4/6/2011 Returned Mail 2 > 3/30/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & > Order 3 > 3/28/2011 Child Support Information Sheet > 1 > 3/28/2011 Certified Notice of Delinquent Support > 1 > 3/28/2011 Notice to Depository > 1 > 3/28/2011 Supplemental Financial Statement > 1 > 3/28/2011 Court Minutes 1 > 3/28/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George > > 3/22/2011 Returned Mail 2 > 3/11/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment > 1 > 2/24/2011 Notice of Change of Address > 1 > 2/24/2011 Memorandum 7 > 2/24/2011 Copy/Copies 6 > 2/23/2011 Answer 6 > 2/18/2011 Alias Summons Returned Served > 5 > 2/17/2011 Final Order 1 > 2/14/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George > > 1/14/2011 Returned Mail 2 > 1/4/2011 Notice of Hearing 1 > 1/4/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment > 1 > 11/29/2010 Notice of Change of Address > 1 > 10/22/2010 Order for Income Deduction > 1 > 10/22/2010 Report/Recommendation and Final > Judgment 4 > 10/19/2010 Court Minutes 1 > 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) 2 > 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) 2 > 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet > 2 > 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet > 1 > 10/19/2010 HEARING - Petition/Motion > 10/8/2010 Returned Mail 2 > 9/20/2010 Order for Non Jury Trial > 1 > 9/17/2010 Notice for Trial 1 > 8/12/2010 Response 2 > 6/14/2010 Alias Summons Issued > 4 > 4/9/2010 Summons Returned Unserved > 5 > 12/17/2009 Summons Issued 4 > 12/17/2009 Certificate of Compliance > 2 > 12/17/2009 Financial Affidavit > 4 > 12/17/2009 Petition 4 > 12/17/2009 Request for Admissions > 1 > 11/1/2006 Notice of Change of Address > 9/28/2006 HRS673 to Bureau > 7/19/2006 Letter > 7/19/2006 Letter > 5/9/2006 Final Judgment > 5/9/2006 Order for Income Deduction > 5/9/2006 Disposed by Non-Jury Trial > 5/9/2006 Final Judgment > 5/8/2006 HRS673 to Bureau > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee > A > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, Renee > A > 4/28/2006 Affidavit > 4/28/2006 Affidavit > 4/28/2006 Court Minutes > 3/29/2006 Order for Non Jury Trial > 3/29/2006 Notice of Hearing > 3/29/2006 Notice for Trial > 3/29/2006 Request to Produce > 3/28/2006 Request for Admissions > 3/28/2006 Notice of Filing HLA Tissue Typing > > 2/9/2006 Notice > 1/10/2006 HRS673 to Bureau > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, Renee > A > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee > A > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated > 1/5/2006 Court Minutes > 1/5/2006 Financial Affidavit > 1/5/2006 Child Support Information Sheet > > 1/5/2006 Child Support Information Sheet > > 12/6/2005 Notice of Hearing > 12/6/2005 Order for Non Jury Trial > 12/6/2005 Request to Produce > 12/6/2005 Notice for Trial > 12/5/2005 Answer > 10/31/2005 Summons Returned > 10/31/2005 Summons Returned > 10/27/2005 Answer Denying Allegations > 8/29/2005 Summons Issued > 8/29/2005 Request for Admissions > 8/29/2005 Certificate of Compliance > 8/29/2005 Financial Affidavit > 8/29/2005 Notice of Social Security > 8/29/2005 Civil Cover Sheet > 8/29/2005 Petition > 8/29/2005 Initial Judge Assigned > > > VOR (Viewable on Request) > Certain case documents contain sensitive or personally > identifiable information that must be manually redacted > before they are viewable by the general public. Documents > listed in the Docket Events section as VOR are public > documents that require further redaction by Clerk staff > before they can be viewed. Follow the steps below to request > access to these documents: > > Check the Request Doc checkbox for the > document you wish to view. You may repeat this for other VOR > documents on the same case. > Once all document requests have been made for > this case, click the Submit button. A confirmation screen > will display, where you will be asked to enter or confirm > your email address to finalize your request. > You will receive an initial email notification > to confirm your request, followed by additional email > notifications as requested documents become available. The > Clerk’s office makes every effort to complete these > requests in a timely manner. > > For definitions of document types, please refer to our > glossary. > Hearings > Date Hearing Time Location > Pages Doc > 3/28/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 AM > > 2/14/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 AM > > 10/19/2010 Petition/Motion 1:00 PM > > 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated 8:00 AM > 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated 8:00 AM > 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated 8:00 AM > 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 8:00 > AM > 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated 8:00 AM > 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated 8:00 AM > 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated 8:00 AM > 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 8:00 > AM > 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 9:00 > AM > 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated 9:00 AM > 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated 9:00 AM > 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, > Deactivated 9:00 AM > 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 9:00 > AM > 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated 9:00 AM > 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated 9:00 AM > 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, > Deactivated 9:00 AM > > > Cause of Action > > Fraud > Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141: makes it unlawful for state > or local law enforcement agencies to allow officers to > engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives > persons of rights protected by the Constitution or laws of > the United States. This law is commonly referred to as the > Police Misconduct Statute. > > > the exintimate partner and public officer employee > misconduct > BUSINESS TORT RELATED-ADVERSARIAL TORTS OR MATERNAL INJURIES > WITH INTENT > > > > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer_29.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/any-police-department-receiving-federal.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/family-violence-prevention-act-victim.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/false-cpi-personal-torts-tort-of-fraud.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/jarrid-williams-probation-dc-346801.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/201 > Federal laws > Federal law 42 U.S.C. § 5772 & 42 U.S.C. § 5780 > Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5772) defines a "missing child" as > "any individual less than 18 years of age whose whereabouts > are unknown to such individual"s legal custodian." > RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 > False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, > Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do > concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, > F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. > > > 827.03 Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; > penalties.— > > intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result > in physical or mental injury to > a child; or > (c) Active encouragement of any person to commit an act that > results or could reasonably be > expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child. > A person who knowingly or willfully abuses a child without > causing great bodily harm, > > > > http://definitions.uslegal/ com/w/willful-professional- > misconduct > > > > PRINCIPAL CASES - HOME STATE ORIGIN INDIANA > > REGISTER OF ACTIONS CASE NO. 1993-CF-008458-AO cases: > OC9901243 PA cases OC9901243 and 02-83719047104532 PA Cause > number 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL Narrative > > "an act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere with > the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the > dignity of the court or respect for its authority. There are > two kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, 128. > direct contempt openly and in the presence of the court, > resists the power of the court, 102 A. 400, 406; and > consequential, or constructive contempt results from matters > outside the court, such as failure to comply... MISUSE OF > OFFICE TO ENGAGE IN RACIAL PROFILING, FRAUD, AIDING AND > ABETTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT RECOVERY BY FALSE ALLEGATIONS > USED TO ABATE DEPARTMENTAL COLLECTION INTERVENTIONS ON > BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT AND MOTHER TO CASES IN THE FAMILY > COURT, AND CHILD SUPPORT OCSE, AFFILIATED WITH FLORIDA DCF > DEPARTMENTAL RISS SYSTEM DATABASES ON FEBRUARY 4TH, 2011 > DURING WHICH TIME COURT DATES OR CONCURRENT ENFORCEMENT > ACTION WAS BEING UNDERGONE. CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 > MANDATORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR > GENERA #Employee Misconduct http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/03/7750844white-collar-crime-victim.html, > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/12/you-cannot-use-information-available-to.html > OIG Investigative and Law Enforcement Authority The > Office of Inspector General (OIG), U.S. Department of > Agriculture (USDA), was administratively established by the > Secretary of Agriculture in 1962 following a major criminal > fraud scandal affecting several agencies within USDA. OIG > was later legislatively established by Congress under the > Inspector General Act of 1978 (Public Law [P.L.] 95-452), as > amended. Pursuant to the Inspector General Act of 1978 and > Section 1337 of the Agriculture and Food Act of 1981 (P.L. > 97-98), OIG Investigations is the law enforcement arm of the > Department, with Department-wide investigative jurisdiction. > OIG Special Agents conduct investigations of significant > criminal activities involving USDA programs, operations, and > personnel, and are authorized to make arrests, execute > warrants, and carry firearms. The types of investigations > conducted by OIG Special Agents involve criminal activities > such as frauds in subsidy, price support, benefits, and > insurance programs; significant thefts of Government > property or funds; bribery; extortion; smuggling; and > assaults on employees. Investigations involving criminal > activity that affects the health and safety of the public, > such as meat packers who knowingly sell hazardous food > products and individuals who tamper with food regulated by > USDA, are also high-profile investigative priorities. In > addition, OIG Special Agents are poised to provide emergency > law enforcement response to USDA declared emergencies and > suspected incidents of terrorism affecting USDA regulated > industries, as well as USDA programs, operations, personnel, > and installations, in coordination with Federal, State, and > local law enforcement agencies, as appropriate. The > enactment of the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and > Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act > of 1996 (P.L. 104-37) authorized OIG to receive funds and > property through criminal and civil Federal forfeiture > proceedings, and through equitable sharing of forfeited > funds and property controlled by the U.S. Department of > Justice. Forfeiture proceeds have severe restrictions > mandated by statutes and U.S. Department of Justice policy > as to how they are used. Forfeiture funds cannot be used in > lieu of the OIG's regular appropriations. False CPI, > PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida > Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do > concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, > F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. RE: CF > OPERATING PROCEDURE (NO. 180-4 https://drive.google.com/folder/d/0B84_tgjFbXNLcUpfaDBSRHBSZDQ/editATORY > REPORTING REQUIiREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR > GENERAL Clearly outlines employee fraud and misconduct > within the scope of cause f action by the Office of the > Inspector General within the Florida Departmentof Children. > § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND > FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 > False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § > 775.085) (complaint ACAP THE FLORIDA BAR INQUIRY COMPLAINT > FORM http://goo.gl/h9wjQr) http://www.dcf.state.fl.us/admin/ig/content/AR2013-14.pdf > Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the > department has to do concerning false reporting for children > and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses wdith false reporting > for adults. https://oig.justice.gov/hotline/contact-doj.htm cc: > letter to OIG FL DCF Keith Parks Resending Complaint > Attached Department form (complaint ACAP THE FLORIDA BAR > INQUIRY COMPLAINT FORM Fw: ATTN KEITH PARKS CONTINUING > INSPECTOR GENERAL MANDATORY REPORTING TO IG OFFICE, > MISCONDUCT COMPLAINT Aug 10, 2015, 12:19 PM § 112.313(8), > Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW 2003 > FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 False complaint Fwd: > ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § 775.085 Enhances penalty > for crimes evidencing "prejudice based on the race, color, > ancestry, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, national > origin, mental or physical disability, or advanced age of > the victim. The duty to report misconduct is one of the > ethical duties imposed on attorneys in the United States by > the rules governing professional responsibility http://www.iape.org/index.php http://definitions.uslegal. com/w/willful-professional- > misconduct/ Rule 8.3—Reporting Professional Misconduct (a) > A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a > violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a > substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, > trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, > shall inform the appropriate professional authority. (b) A > lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation of > applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a > substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for office > shall inform the appropriate authority. (c) This rule does > not require disclosure of information otherwise protected by > Rule 1.6 or other law TITLE 42 SECTIONS 666 AND 654, 657 > COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION CITATION FROM THE FEDERAL > STATUTE OF THE US CODE § 657. Distribution of collected > support 50 STATE TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT PROCESS http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/child-support-process-administrative-vs-judicial.aspx > Child support orders can be established by the courts or > by an administrative entity. Statutes Pertaining to > Violations of Civil Rights Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Every > person who, under color or any statute, ordinance, > regulation, custom or usage, of any State of Territory, > subjects ... any citizen of the United States ... to the > deprivation of any rights, privileges or immunities secured > by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party > injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper > proceeding for redress. Felony to Interfere With Civil > Rights Title 42 U.S.C § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with > civil rights (1) Preventing officer from performing duty. If > two or more persons ... conspire to prevent ... any person > from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of > confidence under the United States, or from discharging any > duties thereof; or to injure him in his person or property > on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his > office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or > to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, > or impede him in the discharge of his official duties. (2) > Obstructing justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror. > If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to > deter, by force, intimidation, or threat, any party or > witness in any court of the United States from attending > such court, or from testifying to any matter pending > therein, freely, fully, and truthfully, or to injure such > party or witness in his person or property on account of his > having so attended or testified, or to influence the > verdict, presentment, or indictment of any grand or petit > juror in any such court, or to injure such juror in his > person or property on account of any verdict, presentment, > or indictment lawfully assented to by him, or of his being > or having been such juror; or if two or more persons > conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, > obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of > justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to > any citizen the equal protection of the law, or to injure > him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to > enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to > the equal protection of the laws; (3) Depriving persons of > rights or privileges. If two or more persons in any State or > Territory conspire, or go in disguise on the highway or on > the premises of another, for the purpose of depriving, > either directly or indirectly, any person or class of > persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal > privileges and immunities under the laws, or for the purpose > of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of > any State or Territory from giving or securing to all > persons within such State or Territory the equal protection > of the laws; ... or to injure any citizen in person or > property on account of such support or advocacy; in any case > of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more > persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in > furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby > another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of > having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of > the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have > an action for the recovery of damages, occasioned by such > injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the > conspirators. Title 42 U.S.C. § 1985 pertains to a > conspiracy to interfere with civil rights, (1) to prevent an > officer from performing a duty; (2) obstructing justice; > intimidating party, witness, or juror; (3) or depriving > persons of rights or privileges. Title 42 U.S.C. § 1986. > Action for neglect to prevent conspiracy Every person who, > having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be > done, and mentioned in the preceding section [42 USCS § > 1985], are about to be committed, and having power to > prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, > neglects or refuses to do so, if such wrongful act be > committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his > legal representatives, for all damages caused by such > wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence > could have prevented; And such damages may be recovered in > an action on the case; and any number of persons guilty of > such wrongful neglect or refusal may be joined as defendants > in the action, and if the death of any party be caused by > any such wrongful act and neglect, the legal representatives > of the deceased shall have such action therefore, and may > recover not exceeding five thousand dollars damages therein, > for the benefit of the widow of the deceased, if there be > one, and if there be no widow, then for the benefit of the > next of kin of the deceased. But no action under the > provisions of this section shall be sustained which is not > commenced within one year after the cause of action has > accrued. Keith Parks, Inspector General 1317 Winewood Blvd., > Bldg. 5, Second Floor Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700 Phone: > (850) 488-1225 Fax: (850) 488-1428 Maxine McGregor Client > Relations Coordinator Email: Maxine_McGregor@dcf.state.fl.us > Address: 400 West Robinson Street Hurston Bldg., South > Tower, S S-1106 Orlando Florida 32801 United States Phone > Number: 407-317-7000 x7047 ACCESS Florida Gretchen Perry > Client Relations Coordinator Address: 400 West Robinson > Street Hurston Bldg., South Tower, S S-1106 Orlando Florida > 32801 United States Phone Number: 407-317-7000 x7045 1) CPS > may only place founded reports on the state's central > registry of child abuse and neglect. (In some states, > unfounded reports are placed on the central registry, which > not only causes harm to innocent people but is also a > violation of due process.) 2) Caseworkers must inform > families if a report is anonymous. (There is a difference > between anonymous and confidential—reporters’ names > should be kept confidential, but anonymous reports are not > as reliable as those made by known reporters.) 3) Parents > must be allowed to select an unrelated adult to be present > during interviews of their children. 4) Investigations must > cease immediately upon discovery that the allegations are > false. Continuing the investigation process despite proof of > innocence only traumatizes the family and wastes state > resources. 5) Parents must have access to the records of > their investigations. HSLDA also continues to assist with > incorporating the following two federal CAPTA requirements > into state codes: 1) Requiring child protective services > workers to be trained in their duty to protect the statutory > and constitutional rights of those they are investigating. > 2) Requiring child protective services personnel to advise > individuals subject to a child abuse and neglect > investigation of the complaint or allegation made against > them. Notes 1. Children’s Bureau. (2003). Child > Maltreatment. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. > Retrieved > fromhttp://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm03/index.htm. > 2. Calabretta v. Floyd, 189 F.3d 808 (1999). Claudia > Hernandez 400 W. Robinson St. (Hurston South Tower) Ste. # > S-509, Orlando, FL 32801-1718 WHITE COLLAR CRIMES ABUSE OF > PROCESS PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT LAWYER MISCONDUCT JUDICIAL > MISCONDUCT Saturday, 12 December 2015 You cannot use > information available to you because of your job, but not > available to the public, for your personal benefit or for > the benefit of others. § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF > OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes > chapter 787 787.03 False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT > (Fla. Stat. § 775.085 Enhances penalty for crimes > evidencing "prejudice based on the race, color, ancestry, > ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, > mental or physical disability, or advanced age of the > victim. The duty to report misconduct is one of the ethical > duties imposed on attorneys in the United States by the > rules governing professional responsibility http://www.iape.org/index.php http://definitions.uslegal. com/w/willful-professional- > misconduct/ Rule 8.3—Reporting Professional Misconduct (a) > A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a > violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a > substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, > trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, > shall inform the appropriate professional authority. (b) A > lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation of > applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a > substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for office > shall inform the appropriate authority. (c) This rule does > not require disclosure of information otherwise protected by > Rule 1.6 or other law. http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309048893 Cases > 2005-DR-014270-O (Paternity) P I I Lead Attorneys Petitioner > SHAW, SHEILA J BARBARA FANCHER(LIMITED) JONES, Esquire > Retained 407-849-1133(W) Respondent GONZALEZ, CARLOS A > RUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire Retained 407-786-2889(W) > E & O C & O C DISPOSITIONS 11/10/ Final Order of > Dismissal After Hearing 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal > After Hearing 2004 OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS 01/01/ Case > Reassigned to Division 2007 Case Reassigned to Division|CASE > REASSIGNED TO JUDGE 38 02/11/ Notice 2005 Notice|NOTICE OF > CONCLUSION OF REPRESENTATION 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal > After Hearing 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing > 2004 Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing|FINAL ORDER OF > DISMISSAL AFTER HEARING RECORDED RELATED CASES - PRINCIPAL > JUDICIAL OR PROFESSION MISCONDUCT-FRAUD ON THE COURTS- > PERSONAL AND BUSINESS TORT RELATED-ADVERSARIAL TORTS OR > MATERNAL INJURIES WITH INTENT http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer_29.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/any-police-department-receiving-federal.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/family-violence-prevention-act-victim.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/false-cpi-personal-torts-tort-of-fraud.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/jarrid-williams-probation-dc-346801.html > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/201 > Federal laws Federal law 42 U.S.C. § 5772 & 42 > U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5772) defines a > "missing child" as "any individual less than 18 years of age > whose whereabouts are unknown to such individual"s legal > custodian." RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI, > PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida > Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do > concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, > F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. 827.03 > Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; > penalties.— intentional act that could reasonably be > expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child; > or (c) Active encouragement of any person to commit an act > that results or could reasonably be expected to result in > physical or mental injury to a child. A person who knowingly > or willfully abuses a child without causing great bodily > harm, http://definitions.uslegal. com/w/willful-professional- > misconduct PRINCIPAL CASES - HOME STATE ORIGIN INDIANA > REGISTER OF ACTIONS CASE NO. 1993-CF-008458-AO cases: > OC9901243 PA cases OC9901243 and 02-83719047104532 PA Cause > number 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL 2010-DP 1170 FL > INDIANA CASE NUMBERS Paternity case file no J18720 filed > 11-16-71/11-24-71 order date Shirley Ann Shaw/Claude R. > Jackson mariired December 31st, 1978 marriage license number > CDR-94-114 Shirley Ann Shaw Joseph Nikolaenko marriage ended > June 30, 1995 Buddmeeks Ctr Domestic case DCM-91-6993 1991 > marriage license number 02D01-9707-ML-001399 07/08/97 > married on 07/26/1997 DOB 04/21/46 Joseph Nikolaenko mother > Michlaina Nikolaenko 5012 Pacer Run Ft. Wayne, IN Gwedolyn > Ann Brown DOB 04/12/60 son Tyrese Dartanvan Brown father > Thomas Lewis Brown mother Mary Lee Spann 3054 Schele Ave Ft. > Wayne, IN Dorothy Jackson Claude Jackson married July 2, > 1983 Divorce petition 02C01-9110-D1-1313 CDR-91-1313 > "...Additionally, whether substantive or procedural > misconduct is the basis for the sanction, the trial court > must hold an evidentiary hearing before dismissing a case > with prejudice,8 and must make an express finding that the > conduct forming the basis for the dismissal was willful or > done in bad faith or was deliberate and in contumacious > disregard of the court’s authority.9 Appellate courts do > not hesitate to reverse and remand for noncompliance with > these requirements. Substantive misconduct is and should be > subject to less tolerance before dismissal with prejudice is > warranted. Lying about facts central to the case, including > the nature and extent of one’s own injuries, simply cannot > be tolerated and, frequently, cannot be remedied by any > lesser sanction than dismissal with prejudice." Cases: > administrative misconduct, judicial misconduct issues > circumventing TITLE 42 SECTIONS 666 AND 654, 657 COLLECTION > AND DISTRIBUTION CITATION FROM THE FEDERAL STATUTE OF THE US > CODE § 657. Distribution of collected support 50 STATE > TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT PROCESS http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/child-support-process-administrative-vs-judicial.aspx > Child support orders can be established by the courts or > by an administrative entity. In the administrative process, > the state child support agency, also referred to as the IV-D > agency, establishes the support order, usually without a > hearing. In the judicial process, the court sets the order. > Many states use a hybrid, or quasi-judicial process, which > incorporates some judicial elements mixed with > administrative processes. For example, many states may use > an administrative forum, such as an attorney general’s > office, but may incorporate a judicial element, such as an > attorney. The three elements that determine where a process > falls on the administrative/judicial continuum are 1) the > forum used, 2) presiding officer, and 3) attorney > involvement. The forum used simply means where the child > support order is processed. Forums can include a courtroom, > an administrative office of the court, the offices of an > executive branch division such as the office of > administrative hearings or attorney general’s office, the > IV-D umbrella agency, or the IV-D agency itself. The > presiding officer is the person who is in charge of > supervising and running the process. Attorney involvement > refers to whether or not an attorney represents the IV-D > agency during the process. A state with a highly judicial > process is one in which the forum used is a courtroom, the > presiding officer is a judge, and the IV-D agency is > represented by an attorney. States may be quasi-judicial, > which means that the forum used may be a courtroom, but > instead of a judge presiding, it may be a hearing officer > who oversees the process. It is difficult to categorize > states as fully judicial or fully administrative as the > process differs depending on the type of order being > processed. For example, there may be different processes for > contested (challenged) and uncontested orders. Cases > 2002-DR-050423-1 SHAW, SHEILA J 03/0912002 VS, COLEMAN, > Family JIMMY L Income Deduction 0 Closed - Non SRS > 2002-DR-006249-0 SHAW, SHEILA J 04124/2002 Paternity vs. > GONZALEZ, Div 38 Closed - SRS CARLOS A Kest, Sally D M SHAW, > SHEILA 08/29/2005 Paternity DOR JOCELYN VS. Div42 Re-Closed > GONZALEZ, Evans, Robert M CARLOS ALBERTO SHAW, SHEILA > 01/06/2010 Child Support DOR JOCELYN Div 42 Reopened Other > KARENA vs. Evans, Robert M WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN SHAW, > SHEILA 04112/2011 Domestic Violence w JOCELYN VS. Div 44 > Closed - SRS WILLIAMS, JARRID Jordan, John E DESHAUN > 2005-DR-014270-0 2010-DR-000170-0 2011-0R-006367-0 > CIRCUMVENTING COMPLAINTS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND > ENFORCEMENT UNDER (1) CIVIL ACTIONS BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL > SEC. 2000e-6. [Section 707] (a) Complaint... (2) STATE OF > FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CF OPERATING PROCEDURE CHILDREN AND > FAMILIES NO. 180-4 TALLAHASSEE, October 29, 2007 Inspector > General MANDATORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF > INSPECTOR GENERAL (3) The following is an abstract from the > Administration for Children and Families' website and the > Administration for Child Support Enforcement, both of which > publish all statutory guidelines for the collection of child > support and payments thereof to the recipient. collection > and distribution of child support payments Within this site > it is defined as follows Frequently Asked Questions about > Child Support Collection/Distribution For answers to > questions about your own case, you need to check with your > local or state child support office. State CSE agency > telephone numbers and addresses are at (English):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ > directories/ext/IVd_list.cfm (Spanish):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ > directories/ext/Espanol_IVd_ list.cfm State CSE agency > web site links are on our web site at the following > location: http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/ programs/cse/extinf.htm#exta > The following general information may be helpful: If the > state collects more in a month than is to be paid to the > family for their current and past due support, the rest of > the money can be used to repay the state and federal > governments for cash assistance * AFDC or TANF * that a > family received. Also, child support agencies can recover > all or part of the costs of their services from people who > are not in a cash assistance program. These can include the > cost of legal work done by agency attorneys or the costs of > locating a parent, for example. The money may be deducted > from the child support payment, or it may be collected from > the noncustodial parent. For more information on changes in > the law and how they may affect you, as well as the cost > recovery practices of your State, you should contact your > State child support enforcement agency. atty general > complaint sent regarding misconduct( SAME ATTORNEY SAME FIRM > WITH KNOWLEDGE OF PRIOR > CASES-http://www.avvo.com/attorneys/32803-fl-ana-tangelrodriguez-1255736.html)/Duty > to Report Lawyer Misconduct--Duty to > Supervise--Responsibilities of Members of Law Firm > Management Committees; These statutes include: Section > 210401 of the Vio Me to parentSent Me to infoSent Me to Investigate@KCTV5.comSent Sheila Jocelyn Shaw http://professsorshaw.blogspot.com/ --- On Thu, 4/28/16, Sheila Shaw wrote: > From: Sheila Shaw > Subject: Fw: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw: prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct > To: "parent" > Date: Thursday, April 28, 2016, 9:40 PM > Me to staff@caught.netSent On Fri, 4/29/16, Sheila Shaw wrote: > From: Sheila Shaw > Subject: Fw: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw: prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct > To: Investigate@KCTV5.com > Date: Friday, April 29, 2016, 3:41 PM > > > Sheila Jocelyn Shaw > http://professsorshaw.blogspot.com/ > > > --- On Thu, 4/28/16, Sheila Shaw > wrote: > > > From: Sheila Shaw > > Subject: Fw: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing > cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court > Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw: > prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct > > To: "parent" > > Date: Thursday, April 28, 2016, 9:40 PM > > > Me to PoliceSent Me to kkovobov@ndaa.orgDrafts Edit Me to ethics.help@usps.govSent Sheila Jocelyn Shaw http://professsorshaw.blogspot.com/ --- On Thu, 4/28/16, Sheila Shaw wrote: > From: Sheila Shaw > Subject: Fw: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw: prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct > To: "info" > Date: Thursday, April 28, 2016, 10:23 PM > Me to Gang AllianceSent Me to Victims2@pacific.eduSent Me to Victims2@pacific.eduSent Me to PublicSent From: Sheila Shaw ; To: ; Subject: Fw: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw Sent: Tue, May 24, 2016 3:50:11 PM From: Sheila Shaw ; To: Gang Alliance ; Subject: Fw: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw: prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct Sent: Wed, May 18, 2016 1:34:14 PM From: Sheila Shaw ; To: ; Subject: S 1765 Hate Crime Incidents, Circumventing cases in Orange County Circuit Court, Clerk of Court Employee misconduct, Attorney Deceit Misconduct Fw: prosecutorial misconduct, attorney misconduct Sent: Thu, Apr 28, 2016 7:26:30 PM VAWA REPORT REGARDING NOT ONLY ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT IN CHILD CUSTODY MODIFICATION Intentionally omitted criminal nonsupport, offensive behaviour, professional misconduct and ethnic biasedness, child exploitation and institutional racism Title 42 section 42 1983, 14141 attorney prosecutorial child chustody exploitation including false statements never heard throughout case trial activity, false statements to commence proceedings Case Type: Paternity Date Filed: 4/24/2002 Location: Div 38 UCN: 482002DR006249A001OX Judge: Patricia A Doherty Status: Closed - SRS Date Description Pages Doc Request Doc 7/10/2013 Letter 12 3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address 1 1/1/2007 Case Reassigned to Division 2/11/2005 Notice 11/10/2004 Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 11/10/2004 Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Smith, Maura T 9/24/2004 Court Minutes 9/24/2004 Affidavit 9/13/2004 Pluries Summons Unserved 7/28/2004 Pluries Summons Served 7/27/2004 Notice of Hearing 7/16/2004 Motion to Dismiss 7/14/2004 Notice of Unavailability 7/14/2004 Notice Appearance of Counsel 7/1/2004 Affidavit of Lost/Destroyed Instrument 7/1/2004 Pluries Summons Issued 4/16/2004 Pluries Summons Issued 1/6/2004 Returned Mail 12/26/2003 Certificate of Mailing 12/26/2003 Affidavit 12/26/2003 Notice of Action Issued 10/13/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved 9/12/2003 Pluries Summons Issued 9/3/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved 9/3/2003 Affidavit 9/3/2003 Motion 9/3/2003 Motion for Default 9/3/2003 Affidavit 9/3/2003 Motion 9/3/2003 Motion for Default 8/4/2003 Pluries Summons Issued 7/31/2003 Request for Admissions 6/9/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved 5/21/2003 Pluries Summons Issued 5/1/2003 Third Party Summons 2/11/2003 Pluries Summons Issued 12/26/2002 Pluries Summons Served 11/8/2002 Pluries Summons Issued 9/24/2002 Pluries Summons Unserved 8/30/2002 Pluries Summons Issued 7/29/2002 Summons Returned 7/3/2002 Alias Summons Issued 5/15/2002 Summons Returned 4/24/2002 Summons Issued 4/24/2002 Affidavit of Non Military Service 4/24/2002 Request for Admissions 4/24/2002 Affidavit of Need 4/24/2002 Certificate of Compliance 4/24/2002 Financial Affidavit 4/24/2002 Civil Cover Sheet 4/24/2002 Petition 4/24/2002 Initial Judge Assigned Case Type: Paternity DOR Date Filed: 8/29/2005 Location: Div 42 UCN: 482005DR014270A001OX Judge: Heather P Rodriguez Status: Re-Closed Citation Number: Date Description Pages Doc Request Doc 3/3/2016 Returned Mail 3 2/11/2016 Order Denying 2 2/11/2016 Order Denying 2 4/14/2015 Motion to Vacate 10 4/14/2015 Notice 3 7/3/2013 Letter 5 3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address 1 8/7/2012 Letter 11 5/15/2012 Order Denying 1 5/7/2012 Birth Certificate 1 5/7/2012 Motion 107 5/7/2012 Civil Cover Sheet 2 4/2/2012 Notice of Change of Address 1 4/2/2012 Motion 74 12/5/2011 Letter 3 11/14/2011 Notice of Change of Address 1 9/19/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & Order 2 9/14/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 9/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 9/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 4/6/2011 Returned Mail 2 3/30/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & Order 3 3/28/2011 Child Support Information Sheet 1 3/28/2011 Certified Notice of Delinquent Support 1 3/28/2011 Notice to Depository 1 3/28/2011 Supplemental Financial Statement 1 3/28/2011 Court Minutes 1 3/28/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George 3/22/2011 Returned Mail 2 3/11/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment 1 2/24/2011 Notice of Change of Address 1 2/24/2011 Memorandum 7 2/24/2011 Copy/Copies 6 2/23/2011 Answer 6 2/18/2011 Alias Summons Returned Served 5 2/17/2011 Final Order 1 2/14/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George 1/14/2011 Returned Mail 2 1/4/2011 Notice of Hearing 1 1/4/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment 1 11/29/2010 Notice of Change of Address 1 10/22/2010 Order for Income Deduction 1 10/22/2010 Report/Recommendation and Final Judgment 4 10/19/2010 Court Minutes 1 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) 2 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) 2 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet 2 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet 1 10/19/2010 HEARING - Petition/Motion 10/8/2010 Returned Mail 2 9/20/2010 Order for Non Jury Trial 1 9/17/2010 Notice for Trial 1 8/12/2010 Response 2 6/14/2010 Alias Summons Issued 4 4/9/2010 Summons Returned Unserved 5 12/17/2009 Summons Issued 4 12/17/2009 Certificate of Compliance 2 12/17/2009 Financial Affidavit 4 12/17/2009 Petition 4 12/17/2009 Request for Admissions 1 11/1/2006 Notice of Change of Address 9/28/2006 HRS673 to Bureau 7/19/2006 Letter 7/19/2006 Letter 5/9/2006 Final Judgment 5/9/2006 Order for Income Deduction 5/9/2006 Disposed by Non-Jury Trial 5/9/2006 Final Judgment 5/8/2006 HRS673 to Bureau 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 4/28/2006 Affidavit 4/28/2006 Affidavit 4/28/2006 Court Minutes 3/29/2006 Order for Non Jury Trial 3/29/2006 Notice of Hearing 3/29/2006 Notice for Trial 3/29/2006 Request to Produce 3/28/2006 Request for Admissions 3/28/2006 Notice of Filing HLA Tissue Typing 2/9/2006 Notice 1/10/2006 HRS673 to Bureau 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 Court Minutes 1/5/2006 Financial Affidavit 1/5/2006 Child Support Information Sheet 1/5/2006 Child Support Information Sheet 12/6/2005 Notice of Hearing 12/6/2005 Order for Non Jury Trial 12/6/2005 Request to Produce 12/6/2005 Notice for Trial 12/5/2005 Answer 10/31/2005 Summons Returned 10/31/2005 Summons Returned 10/27/2005 Answer Denying Allegations 8/29/2005 Summons Issued 8/29/2005 Request for Admissions 8/29/2005 Certificate of Compliance 8/29/2005 Financial Affidavit 8/29/2005 Notice of Social Security 8/29/2005 Civil Cover Sheet 8/29/2005 Petition 8/29/2005 Initial Judge Assigned VOR (Viewable on Request) Certain case documents contain sensitive or personally identifiable information that must be manually redacted before they are viewable by the general public. Documents listed in the Docket Events section as VOR are public documents that require further redaction by Clerk staff before they can be viewed. Follow the steps below to request access to these documents: Check the Request Doc checkbox for the document you wish to view. You may repeat this for other VOR documents on the same case. Once all document requests have been made for this case, click the Submit button. A confirmation screen will display, where you will be asked to enter or confirm your email address to finalize your request. You will receive an initial email notification to confirm your request, followed by additional email notifications as requested documents become available. The Clerk’s office makes every effort to complete these requests in a timely manner. For definitions of document types, please refer to our glossary. Hearings Date Hearing Time Location Pages Doc 3/28/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 AM 2/14/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 AM 10/19/2010 Petition/Motion 1:00 PM 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 8:00 AM 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM Cause of Action Fraud Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141: makes it unlawful for state or local law enforcement agencies to allow officers to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives persons of rights protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. This law is commonly referred to as the Police Misconduct Statute. the exintimate partner and public officer employee misconduct BUSINESS TORT RELATED-ADVERSARIAL TORTS OR MATERNAL INJURIES WITH INTENT http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer_29.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/any-police-department-receiving-federal.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/family-violence-prevention-act-victim.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/false-cpi-personal-torts-tort-of-fraud.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/jarrid-williams-probation-dc-346801.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/201 Federal laws Federal law 42 U.S.C. § 5772 & 42 U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5772) defines a "missing child" as "any individual less than 18 years of age whose whereabouts are unknown to such individual"s legal custodian." RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. 827.03 Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; penalties.— intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child; or (c) Active encouragement of any person to commit an act that results or could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child. A person who knowingly or willfully abuses a child without causing great bodily harm, http://definitions.uslegal/ com/w/willful-professional- misconduct PRINCIPAL CASES - HOME STATE ORIGIN INDIANA REGISTER OF ACTIONS CASE NO. 1993-CF-008458-AO cases: OC9901243 PA cases OC9901243 and 02-83719047104532 PA Cause number 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL Narrative "an act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere with the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the dignity of the court or respect for its authority. There are two kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct contempt openly and in the presence of the court, resists the power of the court, 102 A. 400, 406; and consequential, or constructive contempt results from matters outside the court, such as failure to comply... MISUSE OF OFFICE TO ENGAGE IN RACIAL PROFILING, FRAUD, AIDING AND ABETTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT RECOVERY BY FALSE ALLEGATIONS USED TO ABATE DEPARTMENTAL COLLECTION INTERVENTIONS ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT AND MOTHER TO CASES IN THE FAMILY COURT, AND CHILD SUPPORT OCSE, AFFILIATED WITH FLORIDA DCF DEPARTMENTAL RISS SYSTEM DATABASES ON FEBRUARY 4TH, 2011 DURING WHICH TIME COURT DATES OR CONCURRENT ENFORCEMENT ACTION WAS BEING UNDERGONE. CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 MANDATORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERA #Employee Misconduct http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/03/7750844white-collar-crime-victim.html, http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/12/you-cannot-use-information-available-to.html OIG Investigative and Law Enforcement Authority The Office of Inspector General (OIG), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), was administratively established by the Secretary of Agriculture in 1962 following a major criminal fraud scandal affecting several agencies within USDA. OIG was later legislatively established by Congress under the Inspector General Act of 1978 (Public Law [P.L.] 95-452), as amended. Pursuant to the Inspector General Act of 1978 and Section 1337 of the Agriculture and Food Act of 1981 (P.L. 97-98), OIG Investigations is the law enforcement arm of the Department, with Department-wide investigative jurisdiction. OIG Special Agents conduct investigations of significant criminal activities involving USDA programs, operations, and personnel, and are authorized to make arrests, execute warrants, and carry firearms. The types of investigations conducted by OIG Special Agents involve criminal activities such as frauds in subsidy, price support, benefits, and insurance programs; significant thefts of Government property or funds; bribery; extortion; smuggling; and assaults on employees. Investigations involving criminal activity that affects the health and safety of the public, such as meat packers who knowingly sell hazardous food products and individuals who tamper with food regulated by USDA, are also high-profile investigative priorities. In addition, OIG Special Agents are poised to provide emergency law enforcement response to USDA declared emergencies and suspected incidents of terrorism affecting USDA regulated industries, as well as USDA programs, operations, personnel, and installations, in coordination with Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies, as appropriate. The enactment of the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-37) authorized OIG to receive funds and property through criminal and civil Federal forfeiture proceedings, and through equitable sharing of forfeited funds and property controlled by the U.S. Department of Justice. Forfeiture proceeds have severe restrictions mandated by statutes and U.S. Department of Justice policy as to how they are used. Forfeiture funds cannot be used in lieu of the OIG's regular appropriations. False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE (NO. 180-4 https://drive.google.com/folder/d/0B84_tgjFbXNLcUpfaDBSRHBSZDQ/editATORY REPORTING REQUIiREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Clearly outlines employee fraud and misconduct within the scope of cause f action by the Office of the Inspector General within the Florida Departmentof Children. § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § 775.085) (complaint ACAP THE FLORIDA BAR INQUIRY COMPLAINT FORM http://goo.gl/h9wjQr) http://www.dcf.state.fl.us/admin/ig/content/AR2013-14.pdf Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses wdith false reporting for adults. https://oig.justice.gov/hotline/contact-doj.htm cc: letter to OIG FL DCF Keith Parks Resending Complaint Attached Department form (complaint ACAP THE FLORIDA BAR INQUIRY COMPLAINT FORM Fw: ATTN KEITH PARKS CONTINUING INSPECTOR GENERAL MANDATORY REPORTING TO IG OFFICE, MISCONDUCT COMPLAINT Aug 10, 2015, 12:19 PM § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § 775.085 Enhances penalty for crimes evidencing "prejudice based on the race, color, ancestry, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, mental or physical disability, or advanced age of the victim. The duty to report misconduct is one of the ethical duties imposed on attorneys in the United States by the rules governing professional responsibility http://www.iape.org/index.php http://definitions.uslegal. com/w/willful-professional- misconduct/ Rule 8.3—Reporting Professional Misconduct (a) A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, shall inform the appropriate professional authority. (b) A lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for office shall inform the appropriate authority... Stalker/family violence defamation,trespassing,burglary violence harassment from principal cases PRINCIPAL CASES - HOME STATE ORIGIN INDIANA REGISTER OF ACTIONS CASE NO. 1993-CF-008458-AO cases: OC9901243 PA cases OC9901243 and 02-83719047104532 PA Cause number 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL 2010-DP 1170 FL INDIANA CASE NUMBERS Paternity case file no J18720 filed 11-16-71/11-24-71 order date Shirley Ann Shaw/Claude R. Jackson married December 31st, 1978 marriage license number CDR-94-114 Shirley Ann Shaw Joseph Nikolaenko marriage ended June 30, 1995 Bud Meeks Ctr Domestic case DCM-91-6993 1991 marriage license number 02D01-9707-ML-001399 07/08/97 married on 07/26/1997 DOB 04/21/46 Joseph Nikolaenko mother Michelina Nikolaenko 5012 Pacer Run Ft. Wayne, IN Gwendolyn Ann Brown DOB 04/12/60 son Tyrese Dartanyan Brown father Thomas Lewis Brown mother Mary Lee Spann 3054 Schele Ave Fort. Wayne, IN Dorothy Jackson Claude Jackson married July 2, 1983 Divorce petition 02C01-9110-D1-1313 CDR-91-1313Types o Jul 7, 2016, 10:02 PM From Me Details VAWA REPORT REGARDING NOT ONLY ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT IN CHILD CUSTODY MODIFICATION Intentionally omitted criminal nonsupport, offensive behaviour, professional misconduct and ethnic biasedness, child exploitation and institutional racism Title 42 section 42 1983, 14141 attorney prosecutorial child chustody exploitation including false statements never heard throughout case trial activity, false statements to commence proceedings Case Type: Paternity Date Filed: 4/24/2002 Location: Div 38 UCN: 482002DR006249A001OX Judge: Patricia A Doherty Status: Closed - SRS Date Description Pages Doc Request Doc 7/10/2013 Letter 12 3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address 1 1/1/2007 Case Reassigned to Division 2/11/2005 Notice 11/10/2004 Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 11/10/2004 Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9/24/2004 HEARING - Status Hearing - Smith, Maura T 9/24/2004 Court Minutes 9/24/2004 Affidavit 9/13/2004 Pluries Summons Unserved 7/28/2004 Pluries Summons Served 7/27/2004 Notice of Hearing 7/16/2004 Motion to Dismiss 7/14/2004 Notice of Unavailability 7/14/2004 Notice Appearance of Counsel 7/1/2004 Affidavit of Lost/Destroyed Instrument 7/1/2004 Pluries Summons Issued 4/16/2004 Pluries Summons Issued 1/6/2004 Returned Mail 12/26/2003 Certificate of Mailing 12/26/2003 Affidavit 12/26/2003 Notice of Action Issued 10/13/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved 9/12/2003 Pluries Summons Issued 9/3/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved 9/3/2003 Affidavit 9/3/2003 Motion 9/3/2003 Motion for Default 9/3/2003 Affidavit 9/3/2003 Motion 9/3/2003 Motion for Default 8/4/2003 Pluries Summons Issued 7/31/2003 Request for Admissions 6/9/2003 Pluries Summons Unserved 5/21/2003 Pluries Summons Issued 5/1/2003 Third Party Summons 2/11/2003 Pluries Summons Issued 12/26/2002 Pluries Summons Served 11/8/2002 Pluries Summons Issued 9/24/2002 Pluries Summons Unserved 8/30/2002 Pluries Summons Issued 7/29/2002 Summons Returned 7/3/2002 Alias Summons Issued 5/15/2002 Summons Returned 4/24/2002 Summons Issued 4/24/2002 Affidavit of Non Military Service 4/24/2002 Request for Admissions 4/24/2002 Affidavit of Need 4/24/2002 Certificate of Compliance 4/24/2002 Financial Affidavit 4/24/2002 Civil Cover Sheet 4/24/2002 Petition 4/24/2002 Initial Judge Assigned Case Type: Paternity DOR Date Filed: 8/29/2005 Location: Div 42 UCN: 482005DR014270A001OX Judge: Heather P Rodriguez Status: Re-Closed Citation Number: Date Description Pages Doc Request Doc 3/3/2016 Returned Mail 3 2/11/2016 Order Denying 2 2/11/2016 Order Denying 2 4/14/2015 Motion to Vacate 10 4/14/2015 Notice 3 7/3/2013 Letter 5 3/19/2013 Notice of Change of Address 1 8/7/2012 Letter 11 5/15/2012 Order Denying 1 5/7/2012 Birth Certificate 1 5/7/2012 Motion 107 5/7/2012 Civil Cover Sheet 2 4/2/2012 Notice of Change of Address 1 4/2/2012 Motion 74 12/5/2011 Letter 3 11/14/2011 Notice of Change of Address 1 9/19/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & Order 2 9/14/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 9/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 9/12/2011 Writ of Habeas Corpus 9 4/6/2011 Returned Mail 2 3/30/2011 Report/Recommendation/Hearing & Order 3 3/28/2011 Child Support Information Sheet 1 3/28/2011 Certified Notice of Delinquent Support 1 3/28/2011 Notice to Depository 1 3/28/2011 Supplemental Financial Statement 1 3/28/2011 Court Minutes 1 3/28/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George 3/22/2011 Returned Mail 2 3/11/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment 1 2/24/2011 Notice of Change of Address 1 2/24/2011 Memorandum 7 2/24/2011 Copy/Copies 6 2/23/2011 Answer 6 2/18/2011 Alias Summons Returned Served 5 2/17/2011 Final Order 1 2/14/2011 HEARING - Motion - Winslow, George 1/14/2011 Returned Mail 2 1/4/2011 Notice of Hearing 1 1/4/2011 Motion Set Arrears/Repayment 1 11/29/2010 Notice of Change of Address 1 10/22/2010 Order for Income Deduction 1 10/22/2010 Report/Recommendation and Final Judgment 4 10/19/2010 Court Minutes 1 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) 2 10/19/2010 Exhibit(s) 2 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet 2 10/19/2010 Child Support Information Sheet 1 10/19/2010 HEARING - Petition/Motion 10/8/2010 Returned Mail 2 9/20/2010 Order for Non Jury Trial 1 9/17/2010 Notice for Trial 1 8/12/2010 Response 2 6/14/2010 Alias Summons Issued 4 4/9/2010 Summons Returned Unserved 5 12/17/2009 Summons Issued 4 12/17/2009 Certificate of Compliance 2 12/17/2009 Financial Affidavit 4 12/17/2009 Petition 4 12/17/2009 Request for Admissions 1 11/1/2006 Notice of Change of Address 9/28/2006 HRS673 to Bureau 7/19/2006 Letter 7/19/2006 Letter 5/9/2006 Final Judgment 5/9/2006 Order for Income Deduction 5/9/2006 Disposed by Non-Jury Trial 5/9/2006 Final Judgment 5/8/2006 HRS673 to Bureau 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 4/28/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 4/28/2006 Affidavit 4/28/2006 Affidavit 4/28/2006 Court Minutes 3/29/2006 Order for Non Jury Trial 3/29/2006 Notice of Hearing 3/29/2006 Notice for Trial 3/29/2006 Request to Produce 3/28/2006 Request for Admissions 3/28/2006 Notice of Filing HLA Tissue Typing 2/9/2006 Notice 1/10/2006 HRS673 to Bureau 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 HEARING - Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 1/5/2006 Court Minutes 1/5/2006 Financial Affidavit 1/5/2006 Child Support Information Sheet 1/5/2006 Child Support Information Sheet 12/6/2005 Notice of Hearing 12/6/2005 Order for Non Jury Trial 12/6/2005 Request to Produce 12/6/2005 Notice for Trial 12/5/2005 Answer 10/31/2005 Summons Returned 10/31/2005 Summons Returned 10/27/2005 Answer Denying Allegations 8/29/2005 Summons Issued 8/29/2005 Request for Admissions 8/29/2005 Certificate of Compliance 8/29/2005 Financial Affidavit 8/29/2005 Notice of Social Security 8/29/2005 Civil Cover Sheet 8/29/2005 Petition 8/29/2005 Initial Judge Assigned VOR (Viewable on Request) Certain case documents contain sensitive or personally identifiable information that must be manually redacted before they are viewable by the general public. Documents listed in the Docket Events section as VOR are public documents that require further redaction by Clerk staff before they can be viewed. Follow the steps below to request access to these documents: Check the Request Doc checkbox for the document you wish to view. You may repeat this for other VOR documents on the same case. Once all document requests have been made for this case, click the Submit button. A confirmation screen will display, where you will be asked to enter or confirm your email address to finalize your request. You will receive an initial email notification to confirm your request, followed by additional email notifications as requested documents become available. The Clerk’s office makes every effort to complete these requests in a timely manner. For definitions of document types, please refer to our glossary. Hearings Date Hearing Time Location Pages Doc 3/28/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 AM 2/14/2011 Motion - Winslow, George 8:00 AM 10/19/2010 Petition/Motion 1:00 PM 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 8:00 AM 4/28/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 8:00 AM 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Roche, Renee A 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Non-Jury Trial - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Roche, Renee A 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM 1/5/2006 Status Hearing - Deactivated, Deactivated 9:00 AM Cause of Action Fraud Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141: makes it unlawful for state or local law enforcement agencies to allow officers to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives persons of rights protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. This law is commonly referred to as the Police Misconduct Statute. the exintimate partner and public officer employee misconduct BUSINESS TORT RELATED-ADVERSARIAL TORTS OR MATERNAL INJURIES WITH INTENT http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer_29.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/any-police-department-receiving-federal.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/family-violence-prevention-act-victim.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/false-cpi-personal-torts-tort-of-fraud.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/jarrid-williams-probation-dc-346801.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/201 Federal laws Federal law 42 U.S.C. § 5772 & 42 U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5772) defines a "missing child" as "any individual less than 18 years of age whose whereabouts are unknown to such individual"s legal custodian." RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. 827.03 Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; penalties.— intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child; or (c) Active encouragement of any person to commit an act that results or could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child. A person who knowingly or willfully abuses a child without causing great bodily harm, http://definitions.uslegal/ com/w/willful-professional- misconduct PRINCIPAL CASES - HOME STATE ORIGIN INDIANA REGISTER OF ACTIONS CASE NO. 1993-CF-008458-AO cases: OC9901243 PA cases OC9901243 and 02-83719047104532 PA Cause number 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL Narrative "an act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere with the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the dignity of the court or respect for its authority. There are two kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct contempt openly and in the presence of the court, resists the power of the court, 102 A. 400, 406; and consequential, or constructive contempt results from matters outside the court, such as failure to comply... MISUSE OF OFFICE TO ENGAGE IN RACIAL PROFILING, FRAUD, AIDING AND ABETTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT RECOVERY BY FALSE ALLEGATIONS USED TO ABATE DEPARTMENTAL COLLECTION INTERVENTIONS ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT AND MOTHER TO CASES IN THE FAMILY COURT, AND CHILD SUPPORT OCSE, AFFILIATED WITH FLORIDA DCF DEPARTMENTAL RISS SYSTEM DATABASES ON FEBRUARY 4TH, 2011 DURING WHICH TIME COURT DATES OR CONCURRENT ENFORCEMENT ACTION WAS BEING UNDERGONE. CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 MANDATORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERA #Employee Misconduct http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/03/7750844white-collar-crime-victim.html, http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/12/you-cannot-use-information-available-to.html OIG Investigative and Law Enforcement Authority The Office of Inspector General (OIG), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), was administratively established by the Secretary of Agriculture in 1962 following a major criminal fraud scandal affecting several agencies within USDA. OIG was later legislatively established by Congress under the Inspector General Act of 1978 (Public Law [P.L.] 95-452), as amended. Pursuant to the Inspector General Act of 1978 and Section 1337 of the Agriculture and Food Act of 1981 (P.L. 97-98), OIG Investigations is the law enforcement arm of the Department, with Department-wide investigative jurisdiction. OIG Special Agents conduct investigations of significant criminal activities involving USDA programs, operations, and personnel, and are authorized to make arrests, execute warrants, and carry firearms. The types of investigations conducted by OIG Special Agents involve criminal activities such as frauds in subsidy, price support, benefits, and insurance programs; significant thefts of Government property or funds; bribery; extortion; smuggling; and assaults on employees. Investigations involving criminal activity that affects the health and safety of the public, such as meat packers who knowingly sell hazardous food products and individuals who tamper with food regulated by USDA, are also high-profile investigative priorities. In addition, OIG Special Agents are poised to provide emergency law enforcement response to USDA declared emergencies and suspected incidents of terrorism affecting USDA regulated industries, as well as USDA programs, operations, personnel, and installations, in coordination with Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies, as appropriate. The enactment of the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-37) authorized OIG to receive funds and property through criminal and civil Federal forfeiture proceedings, and through equitable sharing of forfeited funds and property controlled by the U.S. Department of Justice. Forfeiture proceeds have severe restrictions mandated by statutes and U.S. Department of Justice policy as to how they are used. Forfeiture funds cannot be used in lieu of the OIG's regular appropriations. False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE (NO. 180-4 https://drive.google.com/folder/d/0B84_tgjFbXNLcUpfaDBSRHBSZDQ/editATORY REPORTING REQUIiREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Clearly outlines employee fraud and misconduct within the scope of cause f action by the Office of the Inspector General within the Florida Departmentof Children. § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § 775.085) (complaint ACAP THE FLORIDA BAR INQUIRY COMPLAINT FORM http://goo.gl/h9wjQr) http://www.dcf.state.fl.us/admin/ig/content/AR2013-14.pdf Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses wdith false reporting for adults. https://oig.justice.gov/hotline/contact-doj.htm cc: letter to OIG FL DCF Keith Parks Resending Complaint Attached Department form (complaint ACAP THE FLORIDA BAR INQUIRY COMPLAINT FORM Fw: ATTN KEITH PARKS CONTINUING INSPECTOR GENERAL MANDATORY REPORTING TO IG OFFICE, MISCONDUCT COMPLAINT Aug 10, 2015, 12:19 PM § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § 775.085 Enhances penalty for crimes evidencing "prejudice based on the race, color, ancestry, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, mental or physical disability, or advanced age of the victim. The duty to report misconduct is one of the ethical duties imposed on attorneys in the United States by the rules governing professional responsibility http://www.iape.org/index.php http://definitions.uslegal. com/w/willful-professional- misconduct/ Rule 8.3—Reporting Professional Misconduct (a) A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, shall inform the appropriate professional authority. (b) A lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for office shall inform the appropriate authority. (c) This rule does not require disclosure of information otherwise protected by Rule 1.6 or other law TITLE 42 SECTIONS 666 AND 654, 657 COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION CITATION FROM THE FEDERAL STATUTE OF THE US CODE § 657. Distribution of collected support 50 STATE TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT PROCESS http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/child-support-process-administrative-vs-judicial.aspx Child support orders can be established by the courts or by an administrative entity. Statutes Pertaining to Violations of Civil Rights Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Every person who, under color or any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom or usage, of any State of Territory, subjects ... any citizen of the United States ... to the deprivation of any rights, privileges or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress. Felony to Interfere With Civil Rights Title 42 U.S.C § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights (1) Preventing officer from performing duty. If two or more persons ... conspire to prevent ... any person from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof; or to injure him in his person or property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official duties. (2) Obstructing justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror. If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to deter, by force, intimidation, or threat, any party or witness in any court of the United States from attending such court, or from testifying to any matter pending therein, freely, fully, and truthfully, or to injure such party or witness in his person or property on account of his having so attended or testified, or to influence the verdict, presentment, or indictment of any grand or petit juror in any such court, or to injure such juror in his person or property on account of any verdict, presentment, or indictment lawfully assented to by him, or of his being or having been such juror; or if two or more persons conspire for the purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to any citizen the equal protection of the law, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws; (3) Depriving persons of rights or privileges. If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire, or go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another, for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws, or for the purpose of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of any State or Territory from giving or securing to all persons within such State or Territory the equal protection of the laws; ... or to injure any citizen in person or property on account of such support or advocacy; in any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy, whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action for the recovery of damages, occasioned by such injury or deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators. Title 42 U.S.C. § 1985 pertains to a conspiracy to interfere with civil rights, (1) to prevent an officer from performing a duty; (2) obstructing justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror; (3) or depriving persons of rights or privileges. Title 42 U.S.C. § 1986. Action for neglect to prevent conspiracy Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned in the preceding section [42 USCS § 1985], are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses to do so, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented; And such damages may be recovered in an action on the case; and any number of persons guilty of such wrongful neglect or refusal may be joined as defendants in the action, and if the death of any party be caused by any such wrongful act and neglect, the legal representatives of the deceased shall have such action therefore, and may recover not exceeding five thousand dollars damages therein, for the benefit of the widow of the deceased, if there be one, and if there be no widow, then for the benefit of the next of kin of the deceased. But no action under the provisions of this section shall be sustained which is not commenced within one year after the cause of action has accrued. Keith Parks, Inspector General 1317 Winewood Blvd., Bldg. 5, Second Floor Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0700 Phone: (850) 488-1225 Fax: (850) 488-1428 Maxine McGregor Client Relations Coordinator Email: Maxine_McGregor@dcf.state.fl.us Address: 400 West Robinson Street Hurston Bldg., South Tower, S S-1106 Orlando Florida 32801 United States Phone Number: 407-317-7000 x7047 ACCESS Florida Gretchen Perry Client Relations Coordinator Address: 400 West Robinson Street Hurston Bldg., South Tower, S S-1106 Orlando Florida 32801 United States Phone Number: 407-317-7000 x7045 1) CPS may only place founded reports on the state's central registry of child abuse and neglect. (In some states, unfounded reports are placed on the central registry, which not only causes harm to innocent people but is also a violation of due process.) 2) Caseworkers must inform families if a report is anonymous. (There is a difference between anonymous and confidential—reporters’ names should be kept confidential, but anonymous reports are not as reliable as those made by known reporters.) 3) Parents must be allowed to select an unrelated adult to be present during interviews of their children. 4) Investigations must cease immediately upon discovery that the allegations are false. Continuing the investigation process despite proof of innocence only traumatizes the family and wastes state resources. 5) Parents must have access to the records of their investigations. HSLDA also continues to assist with incorporating the following two federal CAPTA requirements into state codes: 1) Requiring child protective services workers to be trained in their duty to protect the statutory and constitutional rights of those they are investigating. 2) Requiring child protective services personnel to advise individuals subject to a child abuse and neglect investigation of the complaint or allegation made against them. Notes 1. Children’s Bureau. (2003). Child Maltreatment. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved fromhttp://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm03/index.htm. 2. Calabretta v. Floyd, 189 F.3d 808 (1999). Claudia Hernandez 400 W. Robinson St. (Hurston South Tower) Ste. # S-509, Orlando, FL 32801-1718 WHITE COLLAR CRIMES ABUSE OF PROCESS PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT LAWYER MISCONDUCT JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT Saturday, 12 December 2015 You cannot use information available to you because of your job, but not available to the public, for your personal benefit or for the benefit of others. § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW 2003 FL titleXLVI crimes chapter 787 787.03 False complaint Fwd: ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT (Fla. Stat. § 775.085 Enhances penalty for crimes evidencing "prejudice based on the race, color, ancestry, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, mental or physical disability, or advanced age of the victim. The duty to report misconduct is one of the ethical duties imposed on attorneys in the United States by the rules governing professional responsibility http://www.iape.org/index.php http://definitions.uslegal. com/w/willful-professional- misconduct/ Rule 8.3—Reporting Professional Misconduct (a) A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, shall inform the appropriate professional authority. (b) A lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct that raises a substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for office shall inform the appropriate authority. (c) This rule does not require disclosure of information otherwise protected by Rule 1.6 or other law. http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?isbn=0309048893 Cases 2005-DR-014270-O (Paternity) P I I Lead Attorneys Petitioner SHAW, SHEILA J BARBARA FANCHER(LIMITED) JONES, Esquire Retained 407-849-1133(W) Respondent GONZALEZ, CARLOS A RUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire Retained 407-786-2889(W) E & O C & O C DISPOSITIONS 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 2004 OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS 01/01/ Case Reassigned to Division 2007 Case Reassigned to Division|CASE REASSIGNED TO JUDGE 38 02/11/ Notice 2005 Notice|NOTICE OF CONCLUSION OF REPRESENTATION 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 11/10/ Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing 2004 Final Order of Dismissal After Hearing|FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL AFTER HEARING RECORDED RELATED CASES - PRINCIPAL JUDICIAL OR PROFESSION MISCONDUCT-FRAUD ON THE COURTS- PERSONAL AND BUSINESS TORT RELATED-ADVERSARIAL TORTS OR MATERNAL INJURIES WITH INTENT http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer_29.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/any-police-department-receiving-federal.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/family-violence-prevention-act-victim.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/false-cpi-personal-torts-tort-of-fraud.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/jarrid-williams-probation-dc-346801.html http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/201 Federal laws Federal law 42 U.S.C. § 5772 & 42 U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law (42 U.S.C. § 5772) defines a "missing child" as "any individual less than 18 years of age whose whereabouts are unknown to such individual"s legal custodian." RE: CF OPERATING PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI, PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF FRAUD Section 39.205, Florida Statutes (F.S.) states what the department has to do concerning false reporting for children and Section 415.111, F.S. addresses with false reporting for adults. 827.03 Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; penalties.— intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child; or (c) Active encouragement of any person to commit an act that results or could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child. A person who knowingly or willfully abuses a child without causing great bodily harm, http://definitions.uslegal. com/w/willful-professional- misconduct PRINCIPAL CASES - HOME STATE ORIGIN INDIANA REGISTER OF ACTIONS CASE NO. 1993-CF-008458-AO cases: OC9901243 PA cases OC9901243 and 02-83719047104532 PA Cause number 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472 FL 2010-DP 1170 FL INDIANA CASE NUMBERS Paternity case file no J18720 filed 11-16-71/11-24-71 order date Shirley Ann Shaw/Claude R. Jackson mariired December 31st, 1978 marriage license number CDR-94-114 Shirley Ann Shaw Joseph Nikolaenko marriage ended June 30, 1995 Buddmeeks Ctr Domestic case DCM-91-6993 1991 marriage license number 02D01-9707-ML-001399 07/08/97 married on 07/26/1997 DOB 04/21/46 Joseph Nikolaenko mother Michlaina Nikolaenko 5012 Pacer Run Ft. Wayne, IN Gwedolyn Ann Brown DOB 04/12/60 son Tyrese Dartanvan Brown father Thomas Lewis Brown mother Mary Lee Spann 3054 Schele Ave Ft. Wayne, IN Dorothy Jackson Claude Jackson married July 2, 1983 Divorce petition 02C01-9110-D1-1313 CDR-91-1313 "...Additionally, whether substantive or procedural misconduct is the basis for the sanction, the trial court must hold an evidentiary hearing before dismissing a case with prejudice,8 and must make an express finding that the conduct forming the basis for the dismissal was willful or done in bad faith or was deliberate and in contumacious disregard of the court’s authority.9 Appellate courts do not hesitate to reverse and remand for noncompliance with these requirements. Substantive misconduct is and should be subject to less tolerance before dismissal with prejudice is warranted. Lying about facts central to the case, including the nature and extent of one’s own injuries, simply cannot be tolerated and, frequently, cannot be remedied by any lesser sanction than dismissal with prejudice." Cases: administrative misconduct, judicial misconduct issues circumventing TITLE 42 SECTIONS 666 AND 654, 657 COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION CITATION FROM THE FEDERAL STATUTE OF THE US CODE § 657. Distribution of collected support 50 STATE TABLE: CHILD SUPPORT PROCESS http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/child-support-process-administrative-vs-judicial.aspx Child support orders can be established by the courts or by an administrative entity. In the administrative process, the state child support agency, also referred to as the IV-D agency, establishes the support order, usually without a hearing. In the judicial process, the court sets the order. Many states use a hybrid, or quasi-judicial process, which incorporates some judicial elements mixed with administrative processes. For example, many states may use an administrative forum, such as an attorney general’s office, but may incorporate a judicial element, such as an attorney. The three elements that determine where a process falls on the administrative/judicial continuum are 1) the forum used, 2) presiding officer, and 3) attorney involvement. The forum used simply means where the child support order is processed. Forums can include a courtroom, an administrative office of the court, the offices of an executive branch division such as the office of administrative hearings or attorney general’s office, the IV-D umbrella agency, or the IV-D agency itself. The presiding officer is the person who is in charge of supervising and running the process. Attorney involvement refers to whether or not an attorney represents the IV-D agency during the process. A state with a highly judicial process is one in which the forum used is a courtroom, the presiding officer is a judge, and the IV-D agency is represented by an attorney. States may be quasi-judicial, which means that the forum used may be a courtroom, but instead of a judge presiding, it may be a hearing officer who oversees the process. It is difficult to categorize states as fully judicial or fully administrative as the process differs depending on the type of order being processed. For example, there may be different processes for contested (challenged) and uncontested orders. Cases 2002-DR-050423-1 SHAW, SHEILA J 03/0912002 VS, COLEMAN, Family JIMMY L Income Deduction 0 Closed - Non SRS 2002-DR-006249-0 SHAW, SHEILA J 04124/2002 Paternity vs. GONZALEZ, Div 38 Closed - SRS CARLOS A Kest, Sally D M SHAW, SHEILA 08/29/2005 Paternity DOR JOCELYN VS. Div42 Re-Closed GONZALEZ, Evans, Robert M CARLOS ALBERTO SHAW, SHEILA 01/06/2010 Child Support DOR JOCELYN Div 42 Reopened Other KARENA vs. Evans, Robert M WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN SHAW, SHEILA 04112/2011 Domestic Violence w JOCELYN VS. Div 44 Closed - SRS WILLIAMS, JARRID Jordan, John E DESHAUN 2005-DR-014270-0 2010-DR-000170-0 2011-0R-006367-0 CIRCUMVENTING COMPLAINTS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND ENFORCEMENT UNDER (1) CIVIL ACTIONS BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SEC. 2000e-6. [Section 707] (a) Complaint... (2) STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CF OPERATING PROCEDURE CHILDREN AND FAMILIES NO. 180-4 TALLAHASSEE, October 29, 2007 Inspector General MANDATORY REPORTING REQUIREMENTS TO THE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL (3) The following is an abstract from the Administration for Children and Families' website and the Administration for Child Support Enforcement, both of which publish all statutory guidelines for the collection of child support and payments thereof to the recipient. collection and distribution of child support payments Within this site it is defined as follows Frequently Asked Questions about Child Support Collection/Distribution For answers to questions about your own case, you need to check with your local or state child support office. State CSE agency telephone numbers and addresses are at (English):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ directories/ext/IVd_list.cfm (Spanish):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ directories/ext/Espanol_IVd_ list.cfm State CSE agency web site links are on our web site at the following location: http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/ programs/cse/extinf.htm#exta The following general information may be helpful: If the state collects more in a month than is to be paid to the family for their current and past due support, the rest of the money can be used to repay the state and federal governments for cash assistance * AFDC or TANF * that a family received. Also, child support agencies can recover all or part of the costs of their services from people who are not in a cash assistance program. These can include the cost of legal work done by agency attorneys or the costs of locating a parent, for example. The money may be deducted from the child support payment, or it may be collected from the noncustodial parent. For more information on changes in the law and how they may affect you, as well as the cost recovery practices of your State, you should contact your State child support enforcement agency. atty general complaint sent regarding misconduct( SAME ATTORNEY SAME FIRM WITH KNOWLEDGE OF PRIOR CASES-http://www.avvo.com/attorneys/32803-fl-ana-tangelrodriguez-1255736.html)/Duty to Report Lawyer Misconduct--Duty to Supervise--Responsibilities of Members of Law Firm Management Committees; These statutes include: Section 210401 of the VIOLENCE