> > Subject: Fw: Atty Deceit
> Complaint/Dependency Fraud in the court incidents (
> Barbara Tanner Jones- Tangel-Rodriguez & Associates
> 222 Weber St, Orlando, FL 32803 Case#
> 482005DR014270A001OX)
(Hershkowitz Russell S Attorney Category: Bankruptcy Law [Edit] 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 (407) 786-2889)
withdrew on February 15th, 2011
> representation-(Where a lawyer learns of another lawyer’s
> misconduct in the course of representing her client, and the
> information about the misconduct constitutes a confidence or
> secret within the meaning of Rule 1.6, that Rule prohibits
> her reporting it without the client’s consent. If, after
> having been made fully aware of any possible adverse
> consequences for his ultimate recovery...) AFTER A
> FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS WAS INITIATED BY A FL DCF CPI-
> TEMPORARY MODIFICATION WAS REQUESTED TO ABATE NOT ONLY CHILD
> SUPPORT PAYMENT IN A CURRENT ORDER ISSUES DECEMBER 22ND,
> 2010-TO ABATE LEGAL REPRESENTATION FROM THE GO DEPT OF
> REVENUE BECAUSE THE DCF ATTORNEYS HAD NO INTENTION OF
> CONSOLIDATING EXISTING FAMILY LAW CASES-RELATED CASES IN
> ORDER TO DEFRAUD THE COURT -IN WHICH THE INITIAL ALLEGATION
> WAS NEVER HEARD DURING PROCEEDINGS BETWEEN FEBRUARY 2011
> THROUGH AUGUST 2011
> > To: contact@nw3c.org
> > Date: Sunday, October 1, 2017,
> 1:01 AM
> >
> > Sheila Jocelyn Shaw
> > http://professsorshaw.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> > --- On Sun, 10/1/17, Sheila Shaw
> <nine09digits@yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > From: Sheila Shaw <nine09digits@yahoo.com>
> > > Subject: Atty Deceit
> > Complaint/Dependency Fraud in the
> court incidents (
> > Barbara Tanner Jones-
> Tangel-Rodriguez & Associates
> > 222 Weber St, Orlando, FL
> 32803 Case#
> > 482005DR014270A001OX) withdrew
> on February 15th, 2011
> > representation-(Where a lawyer
> learns of another lawyer’s
> > misconduct in the course of
> representing her client, and the
> > information about the misconduct
> constitutes a confidence or
> > secret within the meaning of Rule
> 1.6, that Rule prohibits
> > her reporting it without the
> client’s consent. If, after
> > having been made fully aware of
> any possible adverse
> > consequences for his ultimate
> recovery...) AFTER A
> > FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS WAS
> INITIATED BY A FL DCF CPI-
> > TEMPORARY MODIFICATION WAS
> REQUESTED TO ABATE NOT ONLY CHILD
> > SUPPORT PAYMENT IN A CURRENT ORDER
> ISSUES DECEMBER 22ND,
> > 2010-TO ABATE LEGAL REPRESENTATION
> FROM THE GO DEPT OF
> > REVENUE BECAUSE THE DVD ATTORNEYS
> HAD NO INTENTION OF
> > CONSOLIDATING EXISTING FAMILY LAW
> CASES-RELATED CASES IN
> > ORDER TO DEFRAUD THE COURT -IN
> WHICH THE INITIAL ALLEGATION
> > WAS NEVER HEARD DURING PROCEEDINGS
> BETWEEN FEBRUARY 2011
> > THROUGH AUGUST 2011
> > > To: "American Bar
> Association"
> > <fje@americanbar.org>
> > > Date: Sunday, October 1,
> 2017,
> > 1:00 AM
> > > Ethics Opinion 246
> > > A Lawyer’s Obligation to
> Report
> > > Another Lawyer’s
> Misconduct
> > > A lawyer suing another lawyer
> for
> > > malpractice on behalf of a
> client
> > is required by Rule 8.3 to
> > > report to bar disciplinary
> > authorities the conduct that is
> > > the subject of the
> malpractice
> > action, if she has sufficient
> > > knowledge of the pertinent
> facts,
> > if her knowledge is not
> > > protected as a client
> confidence
> > or secret, and if the
> > > conduct of the other lawyer
> both
> > constitutes a violation of
> > > an ethical rule and raises a
> > substantial question as to the
> > > lawyer’s honesty,
> > trustworthiness or fitness in
> other
> > > respects.
> > >
> > >
> > > (All HHS and contract
> employees
> > have a
> > > responsibility to assist in
> > combating fraud, waste, and
> > > abuse in all departmental
> > programs.
> > >
> > > FL DCF EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT
> > > CF180-
> > >
> > >
> > > PART ONE (See Page 1, PART
> ONE -
> > > Complainant Information.):
> > Complaint Details Legal Cause and
> > > Tortious Injury (As a result
> of
> > the fraudulent
> > > acts/omissions, and deceit
> by
> > attorney and departmental
> > > employee whereas deprivation
> of
> > rights involved those rights
> > > of the minors and the
> natural
> > parent and mother) *FRAUD ON
> > > THE COURT TO COMMENCE
> PROCEEDINGS
> > On the part of the
> > > attorney herein and afore
> > mentioned in proceedings: Duty to
> > > report misconduct; code of
> > >
> >
> conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228
> > > THE FLORIDA BAR
> ATTORNEY/CONSUMER
> > ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651
> > > EAST JEFFERSON STREET
> TALLAHASSEE,
> > FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON
> > > THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015
> SHEILA
> > JOCELYN SHAW PARTY TO THE
> > > COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE
> ATTORNEY(S)
> > PART TWO (See Page 1,
> > > PART TWO - Attorney
> Information
> > FLORIDA BAR MEMBER(S):
> > > SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE
> STARR
> > ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD
> > > LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ
> 667498
> > AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC
> > > TIBON DORIS MACKEY GAL- PART
> T H R
> > E E (See Page 1, PART T H
> > > R E E - Facts/Allegations.):
> The
> > specific thing or things I
> > > am complaining about are:
> (attach
> > additional sheets as
> > > necessary) "Fraud. Rule 3.3
> Candor
> > Toward The Tribunal -
> > > Comment [1] This Rule governs
> the
> > conduct of a lawyer who is
> > > representing a client in the
> > proceedings of a tribunal. See
> > > Rule 1.0(m) for the
> definition of
> > "tribunal." It also
> > > applies when the lawyer is
> > representing a client in an
> > > ancillary proceeding
> conducted
> > pursuant to the tribunal’s
> > > adjudicative authority, such
> as a
> > deposition. Thus, for
> > > example, paragraph (a)(3)
> requires
> > a lawyer to take
> > > reasonable remedial measures
> if
> > the lawyer comes to know
> > > that a client who is
> testifying in
> > a deposition has offered
> > > evidence that is false. [2]
> This
> > Rule sets forth the special
> > > duties of lawyers as officers
> of
> > the court to avoid conduct
> > > that undermines the integrity
> of
> > the adjudicative process. A
> > > lawyer acting as an advocate
> in an
> > adjudicative proceeding
> > > has an obligation to present
> the
> > client's case with
> > > persuasive force. Performance
> of
> > that duty while maintaining
> > > confidences of the client,
> > however, is qualified by the
> > > advocate's duty of candor to
> the
> > tribunal. Consequently,
> > > although a lawyer in an
> adversary
> > proceeding is not required
> > > to present an impartial
> exposition
> > of the law or to vouch
> > > for the evidence submitted in
> a
> > cause, the lawyer must not
> > > allow the tribunal to be
> misled by
> > false statements of law
> > > or fact or evidence that the
> > lawyer knows to be false."
> > > State employee misconduct
> which
> > resulted in material
> > > injuries and legal
> causation:
> > *Police stalking. Conspired
> > > with FL DCF STATE EMPLOYEE
> > EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT, CPI NUMBER
> > > 5617503201 http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/?m=1
> > > 9457320158 (RFA CASE NUMBER
> > 1143172973) insurance
> > > covering dental/medical Dr.
> Obeori
> > & Dr.Nau (Michyl,
> > > Isis) http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2017/02/httpflcertificationboardorg.html?m=1
> > > Firm associated with
> complaint.
> > Interstate stalking and
> > > trespassing related to a
> divorcee
> > case. Hershkowitz Russell
> > > S Attorney : Fw:
> ADMINISTRATIVE
> > 92-1; In all family law
> > > cases in which a trial is
> > anticipated, the attorney shall
> > > submit a notice that the
> cause is
> > at issue.- intentional
> > > omissions; w: Mr. Williams
> is
> > refusing visitation with the
> > > minor contrary to the oral
> &
> > written child visitation
> > > with Atty Wayne Starr at the
> last
> > hearing 8/30/2011-
> > > subsequent modification
> petitions
> > have been submitted
> > > resulting in excuses by
> court
> > administration, lastly stating
> > > a parental responsibility
> packet
> > is needed- THERE IS NO
> > > PRESUMPTIVE FATHERHOOD
> STATUE
> > APPLICABLE, UNWED AT BIRTH AND
> > > CISTODY BTW 2007 THRU 2011
> WAS
> > WITH THE MOTHERHOOD. THERE IS
> > > NO CHANCE OF RESOLUTION OF
> ANY
> > INTIMATE PARTNER RELATIONSHIP
> > > & WILLIAMS AND SEVERAL OF
> HIS
> > FAMILY TIES HAVE REPEATED
> > > ENGAGED IN OFFENSIVE
> BEHAVIOURS
> > AND PROPERTY THEFTS MONETARY
> > > CLAIMS PRECEEDING THE ACTUAL
> > JUDGEMENT FOR SUPPORT Fw: Court
> > > Administration employee
> > misconduct/judicial misconduct-
> > > unconscionable delays &
> biased
> > proceedings, concealed
> > > concurtent criminal
> proceeding
> > involving Jarrid Williams
> > > 2/2011/ continuing domestic
> > violence& abuse of the child
> > > support order by law
> enforcement
> > personnel ,
> > >
> > >
> > > omissions: unconsolidated
> > cases/related
> > > cases whereas information
> therein
> > would substantially affect
> > > those involved such as that
> of
> > concurrent criminal
> > > nonsupport proceedings
> against the
> > plaintiff/paternal
> > > fathers to case- as
> indicative on
> > the Lidia Gardner Clerk of
> > > Court Registries http://icpcstatepages.org/florida/criminalbackground/
> > > 39.0138 Criminal history
> and
> > other records checks;
> > > limit on placement of a
> child—
> > (1) The department shall
> > > conduct a records check
> through
> > the State Automated Child
> > > Welfare Information System
> > (SACWIS) and a local and
> > > statewide criminal history
> records
> > check on all persons,
> > > including parents, being
> > considered by the department for
> > > placement of a child under
> this
> > chapter, including all
> > > non-relative placement
> decisions,
> > and all members of the
> > > household, 12 years of age
> and
> > older, of the person being
> > > considered. For purposes of
> this
> > section, a criminal history
> > > records check may include,
> but is
> > not limited to, submission
> > > of fingerprints to the
> Department
> > of Law Enforcement for
> > > processing and forwarding to
> the
> > Federal Bureau of
> > > Investigation for state and
> > national criminal history
> > > information, and local
> criminal
> > records checks through local
> > > law enforcement agencies of
> all
> > household members 18 years
> > > of age and older and other
> > visitors to the home. An
> > > out-of-state criminal
> history
> > records check must be
> > > initiated for any person 18
> years
> > of age or older who
> > > resided in another state if
> that
> > state allows the release of
> > > such records. The department
> shall
> > establish by rule
> > > standards for evaluating any
> > information contained in the
> > > automated system relating to
> a
> > person who must be screened
> > > for purposes of making a
> placement
> > decision. 1. Chapter
> > > 560, relating to the Money
> > Transmitters’ Code.
> > > 2. Chapter 812, relating
> to
> > theft, robbery, and related
> > > crimes. 3. Chapter 815,
> relating
> > to computer-related
> > > crimes. 4. Chapter 817,
> relating
> > to fraudulent practices.
> > > 5. Chapter 825, relating
> to
> > abuse, neglect, and
> > > exploitation of elderly
> persons
> > and disabled adults.
> > > 6. Chapter 831, relating
> to
> > forgery and counterfeiting.
> > > 7. Chapter 832, relating to
> the
> > issuance of worthless
> > > checks and drafts.
> 8. Chapter
> > 838, relating to bribery and
> > > misuse of public office.
> > 9. Chapter 839, relating to
> > > offenses by public officers
> and
> > employees. 10. Chapter
> > > 895, relating to offenses
> > concerning racketeering and
> > > illegal debts. 11. Chapter
> 896,
> > relating to offenses
> > > related to financial
> transactions.
> > (b) A felony offense
> > > that is committed with intent
> to
> > defraud or that involves a
> > > conspiracy to defraud.
> (c) A
> > felony offense that is
> > > committed with intent to
> > temporarily or permanently
> deprive
> > > a person of his or her
> property or
> > that involves a
> > > conspiracy to temporarily or
> > permanently deprive a person of
> > > his or her property. (d) A
> > felony offense that involves or
> > > results in the commission of
> fraud
> > or deceit upon a person
> > > or that involves a conspiracy
> to
> > commit fraud or deceit upon
> > > a person. (4) As used in
> this
> > section, “aggravated white
> > > collar crime” means
> engaging in
> > at least two white collar
> > > crimes that have the same or
> > similar intents, results,
> > > accomplices, victims, or
> methods
> > of commission, or that are
> > > otherwise interrelated by
> > distinguishing characteristics
> and
> > > are not isolated incidents,
> > provided that at least one of
> > > such crimes occurred after
> the
> > effective date of this act.
> > > (5) Any person who commits
> an
> > aggravated white collar
> > > crime as defined in this
> section
> > and in so doing either:
> > > (a) Victimizes 10 or more
> > elderly persons, as defined in
> > > s. 825.101; (b) Victimizes
> 20 or
> > more persons, as defined
> > > in s. 1.01; or
> (c) Victimizes
> > the State of Florida, any
> > > state agency, any of the
> state’s
> > political subdivisions,
> > > or any agency of the
> state’s
> > political subdivisions, and
> > > thereby obtains or attempts
> to
> > obtain $50,000 or more,
> > > commits a felony of the
> first
> > degree, punishable as provided
> > > in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or
> s.
> > 775.084. *concurrent court
> > > proceedings FL DCF KNEW
> ABOUT
> > :NINTH DISTRICT HISTORICAL
> > > DATA DIV 38/42 PRECEEDING
> CLAIM BY
> > DCF CPI FELICIA HANDLEY
> > > 2005DR14270 08-24-2004
> Petition
> > for paternity entered
> > > Service denied 09-24-2004
> Petition
> > to establish paternity
> > > denied Respondent petitioned
> to
> > dismiss paternity 11-08-2004
> > > 05-05-2006 Final judgment
> granted
> > on paternity 10-19-2010
> > > Final judgment for child
> support
> > entered 10-22-2010 Order
> > > for income deduction
> 11-29-2010
> > Notice of change of address
> > > 12-28-2010 Petition heard to
> > establish child support
> > > 01-14-2011 Returned mail
> > 01-04-2011 Motion to set arrears
> > > entered 01-04-2011 Notice
> and
> > hearing 02-14-2011 Hearing to
> > > set arrears 01/28/2011
> Plaintiff
> > petitions for the need for
> > > custody denied 02/04/2011
> THE
> > SPECIFIC THING OR THINGS I AM
> > > COMPLAINING ABOUT ARE: 18
> U.S.C.
> > §§ 241, 242). "Color of
> > > law" simply means that the
> person
> > doing the act is using
> > > power given to him or her by
> a
> > governmental agency (local,
> > > State, or Federal). A law
> > enforcement officer acts "under
> > > color of law" even if he or
> she is
> > exceeding his or her
> > > rightful power. THAT ON THE
> ONSET
> > OF PROCEEDINGS DATED
> > > 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA
> SHAW, AS
> > THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE
> > > DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION
> 7,
> > ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT:
> > > Juvenile Division 2000 E.
> Michigan
> > St.Suite 300 Orlando, FL
> > > 32806 PROCEEDINGS (WAIVED
> NOTICE
> > OF OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD
> > > TO BE IN WRITING- WAIVED BY
> THE
> > JUDGE) WERE COMMENCED
> > > WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF
> THE
> > PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE
> > > HISTORICAL DATA AND
> CONCURRENT
> > CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS, AND
> > > HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS
> > CONCURRENTLY PUBLISHED IN
> DIVISION
> > > 42 COURT, VIA CLERK OF THE
> ORANGE
> > COUNTY CLERK OF COURT,
> > > MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE
> RECORDS
> > MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE
> > > RISS DATABASE, THE DEPARTMENT
> OF
> > CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR
> > > ACCOUNTS OF INTERAGENCY
> ACCESS
> > WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
> > > OF REVENUE. THE COMPLAINANT
> MAKES
> > REFERENCE THAT THE
> > > ATTORNEY’S, WITH
> KNOWLEDGE,
> > ACTED IN A DECEITFUL MANNER,
> > > NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION
> FOR THE
> > PURPOSE OF FRAUD RELATIVE
> > > TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF
> JUDICIAL
> > PROCEEDINGS. *Duty to report
> > > misconduct; code of
> > >
> >
> conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228
> > > THE FLORIDA BAR
> ATTORNEY/CONSUMER
> > ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651
> > > EAST JEFFERSON STREET
> TALLAHASSEE,
> > FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON
> > > THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015
> SHEILA
> > JOCELYN SHAW PARTY TO THE
> > > COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE
> ATTORNEY(S)
> > 1. Chapter 560,
> > > relating to the Money
> > Transmitters’ Code.
> 2. Chapter
> > > 812, relating to theft,
> robbery,
> > and related crimes.
> > > 3. Chapter 815, relating
> to
> > computer-related crimes.
> > > 4. Chapter 817, relating
> to
> > fraudulent practices.
> > > 5. Chapter 825, relating
> to
> > abuse, neglect, and
> > > exploitation of elderly
> persons
> > and disabled adults.
> > > 6. Chapter 831, relating
> to
> > forgery and counterfeiting.
> > > 7. Chapter 832, relating to
> the
> > issuance of worthless
> > > checks and drafts.
> 8. Chapter
> > 838, relating to bribery and
> > > misuse of public office.
> > 9. Chapter 839, relating to
> > > offenses by public officers
> and
> > employees. 10. Chapter
> > > 895, relating to offenses
> > concerning racketeering and
> > > illegal debts. 11. Chapter
> 896,
> > relating to offenses
> > > related to financial
> transactions.
> > (b) A felony offense
> > > that is committed with intent
> to
> > defraud or that involves a
> > > conspiracy to defraud.
> (c) A
> > felony offense that is
> > > committed with intent to
> > temporarily or permanently
> deprive
> > > a person of his or her
> property or
> > that involves a
> > > conspiracy to temporarily or
> > permanently deprive a person of
> > > his or her property. (d) A
> > felony offense that involves or
> > > results in the commission of
> fraud
> > or deceit upon a person
> > > or that involves a conspiracy
> to
> > commit fraud or deceit upon
> > > a person. (4) As used in
> this
> > section, “aggravated white
> > > collar crime” means
> engaging in
> > at least two white collar
> > > crimes that have the same or
> > similar intents, results,
> > > accomplices, victims, or
> methods
> > of commission, or that are
> > > otherwise interrelated by
> > distinguishing characteristics
> and
> > > are not isolated incidents,
> > provided that at least one of
> > > such crimes occurred after
> the
> > effective date of this act.
> > > (5) Any person who commits
> an
> > aggravated white collar
> > > crime as defined in this
> section
> > and in so doing either:
> > > (a) Victimizes 10 or more
> > elderly persons, as defined in
> > > s. 825.101; (b) Victimizes
> 20 or
> > more persons, as defined
> > > in s. 1.01; or
> (c) Victimizes
> > the State of Florida, any
> > > state agency, any of the
> state’s
> > political subdivisions,
> > > or any agency of the
> state’s
> > political subdivisions, and
> > > thereby obtains or attempts
> to
> > obtain $50,000 or more,
> > > commits a felony of the
> first
> > degree, punishable as provided
> > > in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or
> s.
> > 775.084. ACAP BAR COMPLAINT
> > > DETAILS/PROFESSIONAL
> STANDARDS
> > VIOLATIONS. Fw: EMPLOYEE
> > > MISCOND KUCT (hate crimes,
> > continuing domestic violence
> > > after breaking up with
> Williams)
> > CF180-4 ( per your
> > > publication, the SCOPE of
> > guidelines, goverance of employee
> > > ethical and professional
> conduct
> > states: “Fraud” means
> > > to commit an intentional
> violation
> > of law or a deliberate
> > > misrepresentation or
> concealment
> > so as to secure unfair or
> > > unlawful financial or
> personal
> > gain.) In this case whereas
> > > fraud in the manner and form
> > constituting DOMESTIC VIOLENCE,
> > > PUBLIC OFFICER/ATTORNEY
> DECEIT,
> > COLLUSION, that he/she did
> > > KNOWINGLY WITH INTENT TO
> COMMIT
> > AGGRAVATED (COMPOUNDED)
> > > SEMITIC HATE, ETHNICALLY
> BIASED
> > CRIMINAL TORTS, DURESS AND
> > > EMOTIONAL ABUSE AND
> ALIENATION TO
> > THE MOTHER WHO WAS ALREADY
> > > A VICTIM OF ABUSE OF
> DOMESTIC
> > VIOLENCE IN THE MANNER AND
> > > FORMS OF EXINTIMATE PARTNER
> &
> > FAMILY VIOLENCE,
> > > PERSONALITY TORTS AND FRAUD
> TO
> > COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS, AND
> > > DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RELATED TO
> > PRECEEDING ASCERTAINMENT
> > > PURSUITS THROUGH
> ADMINISTRATIVE
> > AND JUDICIAL ACTIONS WHICH
> > > WERE INTENTIONALLY AND
> > "SELECTIVELY" BIASED IN
> APPLICATION
> > > OF THE LAWS BOTH FEDERAL AND
> STATE
> > STATUTORY APPLICATION TO
> > > CHILD CUSTODY, CHILD SUPPORT
> > COLLECTION, RECOVERY AND
> > > DISBURSEMENT, WITH AN ACT OF
> > VIOLENCE OCCURRING FEBRUARY 4TH
> > > 2011 IN THE ABATEMENT OF
> CHILD
> > DUPPORT FROM THE PRECEEDING
> > > MONTH OF COLLECTION JANUARY
> 2011,
> > AFTER JUDGEMENT REIDERED
> > > ON DECEMBER 22ND, 2010 LESS
> THAN
> > 60(SIXTY DAYS) THAT
> > > EMPLOYEE KNOWLEDGE THRU THE
> RISS
> > INFORMATION SHARING SYSTEM
> > > PROMPTED MALICIOUS,
> RETALIATORY
> > STATEMENT TO INTERFER WITH
> > > FL SDU DISBURSEMENT,
> REVERSING THE
> > JANUARY PAYMENT AFTER
> > > FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDING
> ONSET
> > AGAIN AFTER AN EARLY
> > > DISMISSAL ON JANUARY 28TH,
> 2011,
> > BOTH OF WHICH INITIAL CLAIM
> > > WERE OMITTED DUE TO EMPLOYEE
> > FRAUD/MISCONDUCT
> > >
> > >
> > > White Collar Fraud
> participant.
> > Program
> > > abuse/court record omissions
> > imposed a biased prejudice in
> > > judicial proceedings,
> concealment
> > of criminal nonsupport
> > > histories of the payernal dad
> and
> > domestic violence against
> > > the mother, natural parent.
> Ethnic
> > intimidation on false
> > > allegations of kidnapping
> based on
> > program employee
> > > misconduct involing Orange
> County
> > Sheriff employee
> > > misconduct, family violence
> > personality torts. The mother
> > > has no criminal history
> > constituting violent crimes or
> > > kidnapping/missing children
> > criminal charges nor child abuse
> > > as alleged personality torts
> were
> > used to slander and defame
> > > the mother by the paternal
> dad's
> > familt ties working in law
> > > enforcement. The incident
> involves
> > retaliatory harassment
> > > related to a family violence
> > situation in another state and
> > > county in which the paternal
> dad
> > alleged that the mother's
> > > daughter was a participant
> in
> > parental alienation and
> > > divorcee proceedings.
> Harassment
> > that was setup through
> > > family ties wirking in
> > administrative venue. Complaint
> > > involves neglience, FL DCF
> > employee violations of
> > > administrative policies
> wherein it
> > is clearly defined what
> > > constitutes employee
> misconduct,
> > fraud. All parties knew of
> > > procedure based upon "duty
> of
> > care", the greater
> > > responsibilty in reporting
> > misconduct was tge responsibilty
> > > of the other employees and
> > attorneys who routinely handle
> > > cases and are subject to
> > administrative policies,
> statutory
> > > obligations and professional
> > responsibilities under model
> > > policies of domestic
> violence,
> > juvenile courts, FL DCF
> > > employee handbook code of
> conduct
> > and which representation
> > > is suppose to enforce a fair
> and
> > equal protection under the
> > > law. CF180-4 Complaint
> against:
> > Devereux Florida Foster Care
> > > Program
> Orange/Osceola/Seminole
> > County 5749 Westgate Drive,
> > > Suite 102 ~ Orlando, FL
> 32835
> > Phone: 321.441.1567 Fax:
> > > 321.281.3887 PERSONALITY
> TORTS
> > TORTS OF FRAUD TO DEFAME
> > > CHARACTER OF THE MOTHER AS
> > DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PERPETUATED BY
> > > STATE EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT,
> CPI
> > NUMBER 5617503201; Fw: Fwd:
> > > ATTACHED AFFIDAVIT ON DATE
> OF
> > FALSE ALLEGATION BY CPI-ETHNIC
> > > BIASNESS/RACIAL PROFILING
> > COMPLAINT;Fw: CPI 5617503201
> > > EMERGENCY RESPONSE FALSE
> COMPLAINT
> > SUBMITTED TO LAW
> > > ENFORCEMENT REGARDING CHILD
> > CUSTODY - THE NATURAL PARENT,
> > > MOTHER HAD CUSTODY
> resubmitted the
> > ACAP CONSUMER ASSISTANCE
> > > COMPLAINT/ACAP ATTY
> COMPLAINT/
> > INQUIRY/COMPLAINT
> > > FORM/INTENTIONALLY OMITTED
> > FRAUDULENT STATEMENT , fraud and
> > > white collar criminal
> behavior
> > 39.0141 A Missing Children
> > > Report is Required and is
> found to
> > be absent in all
> > > proceedings prior to date.
> &
> > 95.11 Tort actions for
> > > fraud or assault
> > &39.0014,39.0141 MISSING
> CHILDRENS
> > > REPORT REQUIRED TO: CC /
> BCC:
> > FROM: SUBJECT: Fw:
> > > resubmitted the ACAP
> CONSUMER
> > ASSISTANCE COMPLAINT/ACAP ATTY
> > > COMPLAINT/ INQUIRY/COMPLAINT
> > FORM/INTENTIONALLY OMITTED
> > > FRAUDULENT STATEMENT , fraud
> and
> > white collar criminal
> > > behavior 39.0141 A Missing
> > Children Report is Required and
> > > is found to be absent in all
> > proceedings prior to date.
> > > & 95.11 Tort actions for
> fraud
> > or assault
> > > &39.0014,39.0141 MISSING
> > CHILDRENS REPORT REQUIRED
> > > Choose File Original Message
> On
> > Jan 9, 2017, at 9:30 AM,
> > > Sheila Shaw wrote: From:
> Sheila
> > Shaw ; To: Nine09digits ;
> > > Sheila Jocelyn ; Subject:
> > resubmitted the ACAP CONSUMER
> > > ASSISTANCE COMPLAINT/ACAP
> ATTY
> > COMPLAINT/ INQUIRY/COMPLAINT
> > > FORM Sent: Fri, Jan 6, 2017
> > 9:39:00 PM ACAP ATTY COMPLAINT/
> > > INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM THE
> FLORIDA
> > BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER
> > > ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST
> > JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE,
> > > FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON THIS
> 5TH DAY
> > OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA
> > > JOCELYN SHAW 863 EAST
> WESTMORELAND
> > ST. PHILADELPHIA, PA
> > > 19134 (PREVIOUS ADDRESS OF
> WHICH
> > COMPLAINT WAS SUBMITTED:PO
> > > BOX 5147, TAMPA, FLORIDA
> > 33657-5175) FRAUD ON THE COURT TO
> > > COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS
> > INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM ATTACHED
> > > DOCUMENT TO THE FLORIDA BAR
> PARTY
> > TO THE COMPLAINT: AGAINST
> > > THE ATTORNEY(S) FLORIDA BAR
> > MEMBER(S): SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ
> > > 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY
> SOS
> > GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA
> > > HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA
> ETZKORN
> > 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS
> > > MACKEY GAL- Ana Elena
> > Tangel-Rodriguez Eligible to
> Practice
> > > Law in Florida Bar Number:
> 254304
> > > Address:Tangel-Rodriguez and
> > Associates Tangel-Rodriguez
> > > & Assoc 222 Weber St
> Orlando,
> > FL 32803-3831 United
> > > States Office: 407-849-1133
> > Email:cselsp@att.net
> > > Personal Bar URL:
> >
> www.floridabar.org/mybarprofile/254304
> > > RUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ,
> > Esquire= Retained 407-786-2889(
> > > 1110 Douglas > Ave >
> > Altamonte Springs, FL> 32714
> > > > (407)> 786-2889 >
> http://www.russellhlaw.com THE SPECIFIC THING OR
> > THINGS
> > > I AM COMPLAINING ABOUT ARE:
> 18
> > U.S.C. §§ 241, 242). "Color
> > > of law" simply means that
> the
> > person doing the act is using
> > > power given to him or her by
> a
> > governmental agency (local,
> > > State, or Federal). A law
> > enforcement officer acts "under
> > > color of law" even if he or
> she is
> > exceeding his or her
> > > rightful power. THAT ON THE
> ONSET
> > OF PROCEEDINGS DATED
> > > 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA
> SHAW, AS
> > THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE
> > > DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION
> 7,
> > ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT:
> > > Juvenile Division 2000 E.
> Michigan
> > St.Suite 300 Orlando, FL
> > > 32806 PROCEEDINGS (WAIVED
> NOTICE
> > OF OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD
> > > TO BE IN WRITING- WAIVED BY
> THE
> > JUDGE) WERE COMMENCED
> > > WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF
> THE
> > PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE
> > > HISTORICAL DATA AND
> CONCURRENT
> > CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS, AND
> > > HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS
> > CONCURRENTLY PUBLISHED IN
> DIVISION
> > > 42 COURT, VIA CLERK OF THE
> ORANGE
> > COUNTY CLERK OF COURT,
> > > MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE
> RECORDS
> > MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE
> > > RISS DATABASE, THE DEPARTMENT
> OF
> > CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR
> > > ACCOUNTS OF INTERAGENCY
> ACCESS
> > WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
> > > OF REVENUE. THE COMPLAINANT
> MAKES
> > REFERENCE THAT THE
> > > ATTORNEY’S, WITH
> KNOWLEDGE,
> > ACTED IN A DECEITFUL MANNER,
> > > NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION
> FOR THE
> > PURPOSE OF FRAUD RELATIVE
> > > TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF
> JUDICIAL
> > PROCEEDINGS. Fraud Title 42,
> > > U.S.C., Section 14141: makes
> it
> > unlawful for state or local
> > > law enforcement agencies to
> allow
> > officers to engage in a
> > > pattern or practice of
> conduct
> > that deprives persons of
> > > rights protected by the
> > Constitution or laws of the
> United
> > > States. This law is commonly
> > referred to as the Police
> > > Misconduct Statute. the
> exintimate
> > partner and public
> > > officer employee misconduct
> > BUSINESS TORT
> > > RELATED-ADVERSARIAL TORTS OR
> > MATERNAL INJURIES WITH INTENT
> > > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-florida-bar-attorneyconsumer_29.html
> > > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/any-police-department-receiving-federal.html
> > > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/11/family-violence-prevention-act-victim.html
> > > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/10/false-cpi-personal-torts-tort-of-fraud.html
> > > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/2015/09/jarrid-williams-probation-dc-346801.html
> > > http://whitecollarcrimecentercomplaint.blogspot.com/201
> > > Federal laws Federal law 42
> U.S.C.
> > § 5772 & 42
> > > U.S.C. § 5780 Federal law
> (42
> > U.S.C. § 5772) defines a
> > > "missing child" as "any
> individual
> > less than 18 years of age
> > > whose whereabouts are unknown
> to
> > such individual"s legal
> > > custodian." RE: CF OPERATING
> > PROCEDURE NO. 180-4 False CPI,
> > > PERSONAL TORTS, TORT OF
> FRAUD
> > Section 39.205, Florida
> > > Statutes (F.S.) states what
> the
> > department has to do
> > > concerning false reporting
> for
> > children and Section 415.111,
> > > F.S. addresses with false
> > reporting for adults. "ESSENTIAL
> > > REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW WERE
> > DIVESTED AND SUBSEQUENT LEGAL
> > > CAUSATION INCLUSIVE OF : 1.
> A
> > MATERIAL INJURY IN THE
> > > PROCEEDINGS BELOW THAT CANNOT
> BE
> > CONCLUDED ON POST JUDGEMENT
> > > APPEAL,2. INJURY WAS CAUSED
> BY A
> > DEPARTURE FORM THE
> > > ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE
> LAW
> > (WHEN THEY ARE VIOLATED)
> > > OCCURRED. IMPROPER PURPOSE
> USED TO
> > ACCESS TO THE
> > > FACILITY/HARASSMENT &
> TORTS)
> > CONTINUATION OF
> > > PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT Fw:
> > REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE
> > > ACTION TO REOPEN CASE CASE
> NO
> > 2005-DR-014270-O DIVISION 42;
> > > Fw: ATTN KEITH PARKS Action
> > founded on negligence, fraud and
> > > white collar criminal
> behavior
> > 39.0141 A Missing Children
> > > Report is Required and is
> found to
> > be absent in all
> > > proceedings prior to date.
> &
> > 95.11 Tort actions for
> > > fraud or assault &
> > 39.0014,39.0141 MISSING CHILDRENS
> > > REPORT REQUIRED WHICH IN ITS
> > ABSENCE AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF
> > > PROCEEDINGS CONSTITUTES
> FRAUD.
> > TORT ACTIONS OF FRAUD
> > > INCLUSIVE OF DOMESTIC
> VIOLENCE AND
> > VAWA BY THE FATHERS TO
> > > CASE WHO KNEW THE ALLEGATIONS
> WERE
> > FALSE THE ATTORNEY’S TO
> > > CASE DID NOT CONSOLIDATE THE
> TWO
> > DIVISIONS, DIVISION 7 AND
> > > DIVISION 42, WITH KNOWLEDGE
> THAT A
> > “THRESHOLD OF
> > > DEMONSTRATIVE SHOWING OF
> FINANCIAL
> > SUPPORT” IN ADDITION TO
> > > THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A
> > RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CHILD WOULD
> BE
> > > NECESSARY UNDER PROVISIONS
> > OUTLINED REGARDING MINORS TO
> > > JUVENILE DEPENDENCY COURT
> CIVIL
> > RULES OF PRACTICE, FLORIDA
> > > STATUTES CHAPTER 39.
> PROCEEDINGS
> > RELATING TO CHILDREN THE
> > > DEVASTATION FROM THE
> PRESIDING
> > RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL
> > > PROCESS ALONG WITH THE
> STANDARDS
> > OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT,
> > > ATTORNEY DECEIT INCLUDED THE
> > FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS: §
> > > 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. Civil
> > contempt is conduct directed
> > > against the rights of the
> opposing
> > party law-imposed
> > > obligation ;"an act or
> omission
> > tending to obstruct or
> > > interfere with the orderly
> > administration of justice, or to
> > > impair the dignity of the
> court or
> > respect for its
> > > authority. There are two
> kinds,
> > direct and constructive."
> > > 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct
> > contempt openly and in the
> > > presence of the court,
> resists the
> > power of the court, 102
> > > A. 400, 406; and
> consequential, or
> > constructive contempt
> > > results from matters outside
> the
> > court, such as failure to
> > > comply with orders. The
> basic
> > standards governing fraud on
> > > the court are reasonably
> > straightforward. As set forth in
> > > Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43,
> 47
> > (Fla. 5th DCA 1998): The
> > > requisite fraud on the court
> > occurs where “it can be
> > > demonstrated, clearly and
> > convincingly, that a party has
> > > sentiently set in motion
> some
> > unconscionable scheme
> > > calculated to interfere with
> the
> > judicial system’s ability
> > > impartially to adjudicate a
> matter
> > by improperly influencing
> > > the trier of fact or
> unfairly
> > hampering the presentation of
> > > the opposing party’s claim
> or
> > defense.” Aoude v. Mobil
> > > Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115,
> 1118
> > (1st Cir. 1989) . . . . The
> > > trial court has the inherent
> > authority, within the exercise
> > > of sound judicial discretion,
> to
> > dismiss an action when a
> > > plaintiff has perpetrated a
> fraud
> > on the court, or where a
> > > party refuses to comply with
> court
> > orders. Kornblum v.
> > > Schneider, 609 So. 2d 138,
> 139
> > (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).
> > > CONCURRENT PROCEEDINGS THAT
> POSED
> > A BIAS IN SUBSEQUENT CHILD
> > > CUSTODY PROCEEDINGS IN THE
> > JUVENILLE COURT 7TH DISTRICT
> > > ORANGE COUNTY COURTS Duty to
> > report misconduct; code of
> > >
> >
> conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228
> > > THE FLORIDA BAR
> ATTORNEY/CONSUMER
> > ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651
> > > EAST JEFFERSON STREET
> TALLAHASSEE,
> > FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON
> > > THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015
> SHEILA
> > JOCELYN SHAW PARTY TO THE
> > > COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE
> ATTORNEY(S)
> > FLORIDA BAR MEMBER(S):
> > > SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE
> STARR
> > ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD
> > > LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ
> 667498
> > AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC
> > > TIBON DORIS MACKEY GAL- “IN
> THE
> > BEST INTERESTS OFTHE
> > > CHILD”, THE CHILD HAS THE
> RIGHT
> > TO EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER
> > > THE LAW/WHEREAS THE
> OMISSIONS
> > RELATIVE TO THE CASE
> > > PROCEEDINGS PRESENTED A BIAS
> AND
> > NONDISCLOSURE OF EXISTING
> > > DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CONCURRENT
> WITH
> > PROCEEDINGS WHICH AFFECTED
> > > THE CHILD, THE ECONOMIC
> > DIVESTATION FROM FINANCIAL
> SUPPORT,
> > > LEGALLY DEFINED WITHIN THE
> MODEL
> > POLICY OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
> > > THAT THERE EXISTS ECONOMIC
> TORTS
> > AND ABUSE REGARDING
> > > INTENTIONAL REFUSAL TO
> SUPPORT THE
> > CHILD OF WHICH PATERNITY
> > > HAD BEEN ESTABLISHED 5 (5 X
> 365
> > DAYS) IN THE CASE OF CARLOS
> > > GONZALEZ AND IN THE CASE OF
> JARRID
> > DESHAUN WILLIAMS THAT
> > > P0ROCEEDING WERE ON THE
> JUDICIAL
> > CALENDAR IN THE NINTH
> > > DISTRICT COURT WITH A
> WITHDRAWAL
> > ON FEBRAURY 14TH 2011
> > > (COINCIDENTALLY AFTER THE
> ISSUANCE
> > OF A TEMPORARY
> > > MODIFICATION OF CHILD
> CUSTODY,
> > COINCIDENTALLY AFTER A CHILD
> > > SUPPORT PAYMENT TO THE
> FLORIDA
> > STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT BY
> > > CARLOS GONZALEZ IN JANUARY
> FOR THE
> > MONTY OF JANUARY 2011,
> > > AFTER THE FINAL JUDGEMENT FOR
> A
> > CURRENT SUPPORT ORDER HAD
> > > BEEN ISSUED DECEMBER 22ND,
> 2010)
> > VIOLATIONS INCLUDE:
> > > ATTORNEY
> MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING
> > CRIMINAL NON SUPPORT &
> > > CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY ACT
> > VIOLATION(COLLECTION AND
> > > DISTRIBUTION OF CHILD
> SUPPORT
> > PAYMENTS- TITLE 42, FEDERAL
> > > CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION
> LAWS,
> > SOCIAL SECURITY ACT
> > > 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE,
> ASSISTING
> > JUDICIAL
> > > MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW
> > VIOLATIONS: REQUIREMENT OF
> > > STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED
> PROCEDURES
> > TO IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS
> > > OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT
> Sec.
> > 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] (a)
> > > In order to satisfy section
> > 454(20)(A), each State must have
> > > in effect laws requiring the
> use
> > of the following
> > > procedures, consistent with
> this
> > section and with
> > > regulations of the Secretary,
> to
> > increase the effectiveness
> > > of the program which the
> State
> > administers under this part:
> > > Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] (a
> (C)
> > Voluntary paternity
> > > acknowledgment.— (iv) Use
> of
> > paternity acknowledgment
> > > affidavit. —Such procedures
> must
> > require the State to
> > > develop and use an affidavit
> for
> > the voluntary
> > > acknowledgment of paternity
> which
> > includes the minimum
> > > requirements of the
> affidavit
> > specified by the Secretary
> > > under section 452(a)(7) for
> the
> > voluntary acknowledgment of
> > > paternity, and to give full
> faith
> > and credit to such an
> > > affidavit signed in any
> other
> > State according to its
> > > procedures. Heather Morcroft
> > (Appellate Atty) 20 n Orange
> > > Ave Ste 700 Orlando 32801
> FBN
> > 0709859 407-325-3585 Letter
> > > regarding fraud on the
> court,
> > absent administrative remedy
> > > or action in a timely manner,
> that
> > such a biasedness
> > > occurred it is described as
> > unconscionably ethnically
> > > biased, a white collar
> criminal
> > act by a party who misused
> > > his/her office to aid and
> assist
> > avoidance of judicial
> > > action, that the action was
> in
> > violation of the minor to
> > > case’s rights, that the
> action
> > was in violation of
> > > parental rights to recovery
> of
> > child support and paternity
> > > establishment in the Orange
> > County, Ninth Judicial Circuit
> > > and Court, Division 42.
> Sent:
> > Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:39
> > > PM Subject: ATTORNEY GENERAL
> > COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST
> > > Hershkowitz Russell S
> Attorney
> > Category: Bankruptcy Law
> > > [Edit] 1110 Douglas Ave
> Altamonte
> > Springs, FL 32714 (407)
> > > 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com Thank you for contacting
> > the
> > > Attorney General's Office
> > regarding ATTORNEY
> > > MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING
> CRIMINAL
> > NONSUPPORT . Our staff will
> > > process it as soon as
> possible
> > and, if necessary, respond
> > > appropriately. We appreciate
> > hearing from concerned citizens
> > > such as yourself. If you wish
> to
> > keep abreast of the
> > > activities of this office,
> you may
> > wish to consider a
> > > subscription to our
> electronic
> > newsletter Weekly Briefing.
> > > Or perhaps our Consumer
> Alerts.
> > Should you wish to subscribe
> > > to either, or both,
> publications,
> > please visit our
> > > subscription page. COMPLAINT
> FILED
> > AGAINST RUSSELL SCOTT
> > > HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire=
> Retained
> > 407-786-2889( 1110 Douglas
> > > Ave Altamonte Springs, FL
> 32714
> > (407) 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com COMMENT
> > ENTERED ON FEBRUARY
> > > 14TH, 2011- OSCE FL DEPT OF
> > REVENUE PETITIONED THE COURT TO
> > > WITHDRAW THE MOTION TO
> RECOVER
> > BACK OWED OR RETROACTIVE
> > > CHILD SUPPORT SUBSEQUENT TO
> > JUVENILE PROCEEDINGS. THE STATED
> > > MOTIONS STATES “THAT THE
> > REPRESENTATION IS BEING WITHDRAWN
> > > AND THE PETITION IS WITHDRAWN
> DUE
> > TO “QUESTIONABLE
> > > ARREARAGES OWED”- A BIASED
> > STATEMENT WITHOU INQUIRY AND
> > > PRESENTATION OF THE FACTS OF
> > RECORD AVAILABLE TO ALL FL
> > > DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND
> > FAMILIES- FLORIDA- LEGAL SERVICES
> > > FOR CHILDREN, DOMESTIC
> VIOLENCE
> > DIVISION, AND FL DEPT OF
> > > REV. CHILD SUPPORT DIV.- THE
> > ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT
> > > REGISTER OF ACTIONS MAINTAINS
> ALL
> > PARTIES TO THE CASE(S)
> > > PATERNITY AND CHILD SUPPORT
> > HISTORICAL DATA, ADMINISTRATIVE
> > > ORDERS- WHICH ARE ABSENT IN
> > PROCEEDINGS CONSTITUTING
> > > UNCONSCIONABLE DELAYS – IN
> THE
> > CASE OF CARLOS GONZALEZ –
> > > THE PATERNITY CASE LASTED
> BETWEEN
> > 2002 – 2006- RESUMING
> > > WITH A FILING OF PATERNITY
> CASE
> > NUMBER IN 2005 FOR THE
> > > JUDGEMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT
> WHICH
> > WE DO NOT SEE ENTERED AS A
> > > FINANL JUDGEMENT UNTIL
> DECEBMER
> > 22, 2010- A PERIOD BETWEEN
> > > 2005-2010 (FIVE YEARS –
> DELAYED
> > ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS-
> > > ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT) VAWA
> REPORT
> > REGARDING NOT ONLY ATTORNEY
> > > MISCONDUCT IN CHILD CUSTODY
> > MODIFICATION Intentionally
> > > omitted criminal nonsupport,
> > offensive behaviour,
> > > professional misconduct and
> ethnic
> > biasedness, child
> > > exploitation and
> institutional
> > racism Title 42 section 42
> > > 1983, 14141 attorney
> prosecutorial
> > child chustody
> > > exploitation including false
> > statements never heard
> > > throughout case trial
> activity,
> > false statements to commence
> > > proceedings Case
> Type:Paternity
> > Date Filed:4/24/2002
> > > Location:Div 38
> > UCN:482002DR006249A001OX Judge:
> Patricia A
> > > Doherty BARBARA FANCHER
> (LIMITED)
> > JONES, > Esquire >
> > > Retained 407-849-1133(W)
> >
> > Respondent GONZALEZ, CARLOS
> > > ALBERTO > Events &
> Orders
> > of > the Court
> > > DISPOSITIONS > 05/15/2012
> >
> > Order Denying (Judicial
> > > > Officer: Evans, Robert
> M) CC:
> > ACAP/THE
> > > REGIONAL/DISTRICT & OIG
> DID
> > NOT COMPLY WITH OR THE WAS A
> > > FAILURE TO REPORT ( https://oig.hhs.gov/fraud/report-fraud/) attached
> > > ethical complaint form
> regarding
> > FL CPI CERTIFICATION FOR
> > > MISCONDUCT COMPLAINTS; Fw:
> > ORGANIZED CRIME BETWEEN ATTYS FI
> > > FL DCF, GAL, CPI WHO
> INTENTIONAL
> > COMMITTED FRAUDS, EMPLOYEE
> > > MISCONDUCT, PERSONALITY
> TORTS
> > & FRAUD TO COMMENCE
> > > PROCEEDINGS IN COURT
> HARSSMENT
> > DURING THE MOTHER AND NATURAL
> > > PARENT'S POSTSECONDARY
> ENROLLMENT
> > & THEREAFTER DURING
> > > EMPLOYABILITY RECRUITING,
> LIBELOUS
> > STATEMENT WERE MADE WHICH
> > > HAVE NO VALIDITY WHILE
> ABSCOUNDING
> > CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT &
> > > RECOVERY OF RETROACTIVE
> CHILD
> > SUPPORT)Fw: COMPLAINT RE: GAL
> > > PERFORMANCE AND CONDUCT/
> DORIS
> > MACKEY REPRESENTING FL GAL
> > > ORANGE COUNTY COMPLAINT
> INCLUDES
> > THAT THE GAL REPRESENTATIVE
> > > ALSO KNEW ABOUT HISTORICAL
> DATA
> > OMITTED FROM TESTIMONY Fw:
> > > (CASE DP1140 DIV 7/OMITTED:
> > INTENTIONAL BIASEDNESS
> > > concurrent court proceedings
> FL
> > DCF KNEW ABOUT :NINTH
> > > DISTRICT HISTORICAL DATA DIV
> 38/42
> > PRECEEDING CLAIM BY DCF
> > > CPI FELICIA HANDLEY
> 2005DR14270
> > 08-24-2004 Petition for
> > > paternity entered Service
> denied
> > 09-24-2004 Petition to
> > > establish paternity denied
> > Respondent petitioned to dismiss
> > > paternity 11-08-2004
> 05-05-2006
> > Final judgment granted on
> > > paternity 10-19-2010 Final
> > judgment for child support
> > > entered 10-22-2010 Order for
> > income deduction 11-29-2010
> > > Notice of change of address
> > 12-28-2010 Petition heard to
> > > establish child support
> 01-14-2011
> > Returned mail 01-04-2011
> > > Motion to set arrears
> entered
> > 01-04-2011 Notice and hearing
> > > 02-14-2011 Hearing to set
> arrears
> > 01/28/2011 Plaintiff
> > > petitions for the need for
> custody
> > denied 02/04/2011) Fw:
> > > Attorney
> > Misconduct/Resubmitted/Attorney
> Details Needed Per
> > > Request PROSECUTOR’S ROLE
> IN
> > ADDRESSING SUSPECTED LAW
> > > ENFORCEMENT MISCONDUCT (a) If
> the
> > prosecutor has reason to
> > > suspect misconduct or
> unauthorized
> > illegal activity at any
> > > level of the prosecutor’s
> office
> > or in any agency or
> > > department engaged in a
> criminal
> > investigation, the
> > > prosecutor should promptly
> report
> > the suspicion and the
> > > reason for it to appropriate
> > supervisory personnel in the
> > > prosecutor’s office who
> have
> > authority to address the
> > > problem, or to the
> appropriate
> > inspector general’s office,
> > > or similar agency, if
> reporting
> > within the prosecutor’s
> > > own office is problematic.
> > Reporting may also be required to
> > > comply with requirements of
> the
> > applicable rules of
> > > professional conduct, the
> Model
> > Rules and the law of the
> > > jurisdiction. Sheila Jocelyn
> Shaw
> > %{attach}
> > >
> > > Attorney misconduct. Florida
> Duty
> > to
> > > report misconduct; code of
> conduct
> > The duty to report
> > > misconduct is one of the
> ethical o
> > imposed on attorneys in
> > > the United States by the
> rules
> > governing professional
> > > responsibility. With certain
> > exceptions, an attorney who
> > > becomes aware that either a
> fellow
> > attorney or a judge has
> > > committed an act in violation
> of
> > the rules of ethical
> > > conduct must report that
> > violation. Failure to do so
> > > subjects the attorney failing
> to
> > make the report to
> > > discipline.The duty extends
> only
> > to actual knowledge
> > > possessed by an attorney. An
> > attorney who has a mere
> > > suspicion of misconduct is
> not
> > required to report that
> > > suspicion, nor is the
> attorney
> > required to conduct any sort
> > > of investigation to confirm
> or
> > dispel that suspicion. The
> > > conduct at issue must rise to
> the
> > level of misconduct under
> > > the rules of professional
> > responsibility. Thus, an attorney
> > > who witnesses another
> attorney
> > become intoxicated, engage in
> > > adultery, or gamble away a
> large
> > sum of money is under no
> > > duty to report these acts
> because
> > they are not prohibited by
> > > the rules of professional
> > responsibility. Conduct that must
> > > be reported, on the other
> hand,
> > includes matters such as
> > > breaching client
> confidentiality,
> > misusing client funds,
> > > tampering with evidence,
> suborning
> > perjury, offering bribes,
> > > and committing criminal acts
> of
> > violence or dishonesty. https://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228
> > > 8-2.241 Civil Laws Governing
> Law
> > Enforcement Misconduct
> > > BUT ALSO LAWS THAT ARE FOR
> THE
> > PREVENTION OF NEGLECT OF THE
> > > CHILD. 827.03 Abuse,
> aggravated
> > abuse, and neglect of a
> > > child; penalties.— All
> > historical case proceedings
> > > associated with FL Dept of
> Rev.
> > Child Support
> > > Enforcement/TANF
> participation
> > & Medicaid participation
> > > relative to court proceedings
> were
> > filed and available
> > > including court filings and
> shared
> > RISs regional information
> > > sharing system btwn OCSE
> & DCF
> > departments; FL DCF Case
> > > #9457320158 (RFA CASE NUMBER
> > 1143172973) Ineffective
> > > counsel/representation,fraud
> to
> > commence proceedings FL ACAP
> > > Complaint ATTY DECEIT,
> > goo.gl/h9wjQr SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ
> 41221
> > > CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498,
> > COLLUSION #OIG #fraud, PUBLIC LAW
> > > 108 - 21 #misconduct atty
> > deceit,collusion;Case No.
> > > 2002-DR-050423-I,IVD case
> > enforcement FL/PA/IN #misconduct,
> > > cases OC9901243 PA &
> > 02-83719047104532 PA Cause #
> > > 53C079704JP00189 IN
> 2005-01472 FL
> > 2010-DP 1170 FL CASE#s
> > > #misconduct,professional
> > misconduct cases:OC9901243 PA
> &
> > > 02-83719047104532 PA Cause #
> > 53C079704JP00189 IN 2005-01472
> > > FL 2010-DP 1170 FL IN CASE
> >
The Florida Bar acts as a prosecutor in lawyer discipline cases, much like the state attorney's office does in criminal cases. Staff lawyers and grievance committees, of which one-third of the members are not lawyers, investigate alleged lawyer misconduct in those cases referred to the grievance committees. Trials are held before Supreme Court-appointed judges.
WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE LAWYER GRIEVANCE SYSTEM?
The purpose of The Florida Bar grievance system is to provide a means to discipline a lawyer if the lawyer deserves it. The Supreme Court imposes discipline directly. However, a grievance committee may recommend that an attorney receive an admonishment for misconduct considered minor.
The Florida Bar, as a prosecutorial agency, does not and cannot give individual legal service or advice to any person making allegations.
Further, any loss the client may have sustained as a result of the matter involved cannot be recovered through disciplinary proceedings. The lawyer may be punished, but if the complaining person has suffered a financial or property loss, that person's rights must be enforced by usual legal methods against the person responsible for the loss.
In addition, The Florida Bar has no authority to review a court decision on a particular matter -- and the Bar's grievance system may never be used as a substitute for an appeal of such cases.
LAWYERS' CONDUCT RULES ARE STRICT
Most lawyers are reputable. They sincerely try to do all they lawfully can on behalf of their clients. Lawyers value their good reputation. The Florida Bar wants to do all it can to resolve any difficulties which may rise between you and the lawyer.
We know that even if only a few lawyers engage in misconduct, our responsibility is to do something about it. In some cases, the problem between the attorney and the client does not constitute a violation of ethics rules.
The procedures established by the Supreme Court of Florida and The Florida Bar for dealing with your allegations are designed to provide a thorough review of the matter in order to resolve the unfortunate situation in a way that is fair both to you and to the lawyer involved.
WHAT ARE A LAWYER'S OBLIGATIONS?
When attorneys enter the practice of law in Florida, they all obligate themselves to uphold the law and to abide by the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. These rules of the Supreme Court of Florida specifically regulate the professional conduct of lawyers. Those who violate these professional standards are subject to discipline.
http://corporate.findlaw.com/litigation-disputes/complaint-against-a-florida-lawyer.html
