concurrent court proceedings FL DCF KNEW ABOUT :NINTH DISTRICT HISTORICAL DATA DIV 38/42 PRECEEDING CLAIM BY DCF CPI FELICIA HANDLEY 2005DR14270 08-24-2004 Petition for paternity entered Service denied 09-24-2004 Petition to establish paternity denied Respondent petitioned to dismiss paternity 11-08-2004 05-05-2006 Final judgment granted on paternity 10-19-2010 Final judgment for child support entered 10-22-2010 Order for income deduction 11-29-2010 Notice of change of address 12-28-2010 Petition heard to establish child support 01-14-2011 Returned mail 01-04-2011 Motion to set arrears entered 01-04-2011 Notice and hearing 02-14-2011 Hearing to set arrears 01/28/2011 Plaintiff petitions for the need for custody denied 02/04/2011 a

RUSSELL SCOTT > HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire= > Retained > 407-786-2889( > 1110 Douglas > Ave > Altamonte Springs, FL > 32714 > (407) > 786-2889 > http://www.russellhlaw.com concurrent court proceedings FL DCF KNEW ABOUT :NINTH DISTRICT HISTORICAL DATA DIV 38/42 PRECEEDING CLAIM BY DCF CPI FELICIA HANDLEY 2005DR14270 08-24-2004 Petition for paternity entered Service denied 09-24-2004 Petition to establish paternity denied Respondent petitioned to dismiss paternity 11-08-2004 05-05-2006 Final judgment granted on paternity 10-19-2010 Final judgment for child support entered 10-22-2010 Order for income deduction 11-29-2010 Notice of change of address 12-28-2010 Petition heard to establish child support 01-14-2011 Returned mail 01-04-2011 Motion to set arrears entered 01-04-2011 Notice and hearing 02-14-2011 Hearing to set arrears 01/28/2011 Plaintiff petitions for the need for custody denied 02/04/2011 ... Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:53 AM, Sheila Shaw wrote: Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 6:51 AM, Sheila Shaw wrote: concurrent court proceedings FL DCF KNEW ABOUT :NINTH DISTRICT HISTORICAL DATA DIV 38/42 PRECEEDING CLAIM BY DCF CPI FELICIA HANDLEY 2005DR14270 08-24-2004 Petition for paternity entered Service denied 09-24-2004 Petition to establish paternity denied Respondent petitioned to dismiss paternity 11-08-2004 05-05-2006 Final judgment granted on paternity 10-19-2010 Final judgment for child support entered 10-22-2010 Order for income deduction 11-29-2010 Notice of change of address 12-28-2010 Petition heard to establish child support 01-14-2011 Returned mail 01-04-2011 Motion to set arrears entered 01-04-2011 Notice and hearing 02-14-2011 Hearing to set arrears 01/28/2011 Plaintiff petitions for the need for custody denied 02/04/2011 INFORMS THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (ACAP) WITHIN THE TIME AND STATUTORY LIMITATIONS OF 6 SIX YEARS, THAT THE FOREGOING COMPLAINT IS IN REGARDS TO THE VIOLATIONS SET FORTH: IS IN REGARDS TO THE VIOLATIONS SET FORTH: http://www.floridabar.org/divexe/rrtfb.nsf/FV/0B6C8E5CDCA464D685257172004B0FBD 4-8 MAINTAINING THE INTEGRITY OF THE PROFESSION RULE 4-8.4 MISCONDUCT THAT ON THE ONSET OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA SHAW, AS THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION 7, ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT: Juvenile Division 2000 E. Michigan St. Suite 300 Orlando, FL 32806 PROCEEDING WERE COMMENCED WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE, THAT FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS TOOK PLACE, AND THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF PROCEEDINGS ATTORNEY DECEIT OCCURRED INCLUDING INTENTIONAL CONCEALMENT OF THE FACTS REGARDING CONCURRENT CASE ACTIVITY FOR CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT AND RECOVERY OF CHILD SUPPORT ARREARAGES WERE ONGOING IN THE MONTH DISTRICT FAMILY COURT, DIVISIONS 42 & 38, CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT AGAINST HARRIS DESHAUN WILLIAMS AND CARLOS ALBERTO GONZALEZ AND HAD BEEN ONGOING FOR SEVERAL YEARS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF ENTRY INTO JUVENILE DEPENDENCY PROCEEDINGS AS OF FEBRUARY 3, 2011, ALSO THE DATE OF WHICH FRAUD WAS COMMITED, FALSE ALLEGATIONS THAT ISIS SHAW AND MICHYL SHAW WERE ALLEGEDLY MISSING. ALLEGATIONS NEVER SPOKEN AGAIN IN ANY COURT PROCEEDINGS VERIFIABLE BY COURT RECORD OF MINUTES OF THE COURT THAT NO REFERENCE OF SUPPORTIVE AFFIDAVITS, NOT CRIMINAL CHARGES HAD BEEN ENTERED INTO COURT, RATHER A CONTINUATION OF UNFOUNDED HARASSMENT INITIATED NOT BY THE PATERNAL DAD'S BUT THROUGH MISCONDUCT OF FLORIDA DCF CHILD PROTECTION INVESTIGATOR DIVISION. IT IS FURTHER NOTES THAT MULTIPLE EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT OCCURRED CONCEALING THE MISCONDUCT BY A DCF EMPLOYEE. SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS MACKEY Heather Morcroft (Appellate Atty) 20 n Orange Ave Ste 700 Orlando 32801 FBN 0709859 407-325-3585 Attorney for Jarrid D. Williams Carlos Alberto Gonzalez Bar Number: 656755 Mail Address: Wayne Starr P.A. PO Box 560206 Orlando, FL 32856-0206 United States Office: 407-228-7280 Fax: 407-228-4296 Email: waynestarr@cfl.rr.com Personal Bar URL: www.floridabar.org/mybar profile/656755 vCard: County: Orange Circuit: 9 Admitted: 05/15/1987 10-Year Discipline History: None Law School: Stetson University College of Law, 1986 Thank you for > contacting the Attorney General's Office regarding > ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT . Our > staff will process it as soon as possible and, if necessary, > respond appropriately. We appreciate hearing from concerned > citizens such as yourself. If you wish to keep abreast of > the activities of this office, you may wish to consider a > subscription to our electronic newsletter Weekly > Briefing. Or perhaps > our Consumer > Alerts. Should you wish to > subscribe to either, or both, publications, please visit > oursubscription > page. > > > > > > > > > > COMPLAINT FILED > AGAINST > RUSSELL SCOTT > HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire= > Retained > 407-786-2889( > 1110 Douglas > Ave > Altamonte Springs, FL > 32714 > (407) > 786-2889 > http://www.russellhlaw.com > > > > ATTORNEY > MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT & CHILD SUPPORT > RECOVERY ACT VIOLATIONS, FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION > LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING > JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW > VIOLATIONS > > > > > http://www.hinshawlaw.com/the-lawyers-lawyer-newsletter---recent-developments-in-risk-management-03-09-2012/ > > > Duty to report > misconduct; code of > conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 > > > > > ( TORT LAW: A tort is a > civil wrong resulting from a violation of a legal right not > created by contract for which monetary redress is provided. > This may be (a) an act or (b) an omission. More formally, a > tort may be defined as a wrongful act or omission arising in > the course of social re ships other than contracts which > violates a person's legally protected rights for which > the law provides a remedy in the form of an action for > damages. > > > There are two basic > classifications of torts: (a) negligence which is the result > of an unintentional act (b) intentional acts or omissions > which results in a breach of someone's rights. There is > a third group in this area that should be explained. It is > referred to as strict liability.) > > > > > > > 8-2.241 > > > Civil Laws Governing Law > Enforcement Misconduct > BUT ALSO LAWS THAT ARE > FOR THE PREVENTION OF NEGLECT OF THE CHILD. > 827.03 Abuse, aggravated > abuse, and neglect of a child; penalties.— > > > intentional act that > could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental > injury to > a child; > or > (c) Active encouragement > of any person to commit an act that results or could > reasonably be > expected to result in > physical or mental injury to a child. > A person who knowingly or > willfully abuses a child without causing great bodily > harm, > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: professional > misconduct, failure to comply nonprofit compliance, ethnic > biasness and duty to report misconduct by attorney of > judicial misconduct > > > signed and filed a valid > declaration of paternity that has the force and effect of > a judgment, enforceable by contempt > REQUIREMENT OF > STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED PROCEDURES TO IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS > OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT > > > Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] > (a) In order to satisfy section 454(20)(A), each State must > have in effect laws requiring the use of the following > procedures, consistent with this section and with > regulations of the Secretary, to increase the effectiveness > of the program which the State administers under this > part: > > > > > Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] > (a > > > (C) Voluntary paternity > acknowledgment.— > > > (iv) Use of paternity > acknowledgment affidavit.—Such procedures must require the > State to develop and use an affidavit for the voluntary > acknowledgment of paternity which includes the minimum > requirements of the affidavit specified by the Secretary > under section 452(a)(7) for the voluntary acknowledgment of > paternity, and to give full faith and credit to such an > affidavit signed in any other State according to its > procedures. > > > > THERE HAS BEEN A BREACH > OF DUTY/NEGLECT OF DUTY WHEREAS ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION WOULD > HAVE REMEDIED AN EXTENSIVE DELAY IN PROVIDING ADEQUATE CHILD > SUPPORT OR FINANCIAL SUPPORT. IT IS ALSO MORE THAT SUSPECTED > THAT THE UNTIMELY DELAYS AREASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING > BREACH(ES) > the 1996 reforms require > States to adopt laws that give the CSE agency authority to > initiate a series of expedited procedures without the > necessity of obtaining an order from any other > administrative agency or judicial tribunal > > > and > > > > > > > The Violence > Against Women Act of 1994 (VAWA) and the 1997 Omnibus > Consolidated Appropriations Act > > > > > and > > > > > MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER > STATE AND FEDERAL LAW > > > You cannot use > information available to you because of your job, but > not > available to the public, > for your personal benefit or for the benefit of > others. > § 112.313(8), Fla. > Stat. > > > Title VI allows persons > to file administrative complaints with the federal > departments and agencies that provide financial assistance > alleging discrimination based on race, color, or national > origin by recipients of federal funds. > Under Title VI, EPA has a > responsibility to ensure that its funds are not being used > to subsidize discrimination based on race, color, or > national origin. This prohibition against discrimination > under Title VI has been a statutory mandate since 1964 and > EPA has had Title VI regulations since 1973. > EPA's Office of Civil > Rights is responsible for the Agency's administration of > Title VI, including investigation of such ... > > > A registered support > order is confirmed and immediately enforceable unless the > respondent files an objection in a record within a fixed > period of time, almost invariably the 20 days suggested > originally, Sections 603 and 607. > Section > 604. > > > > > TITLE 42 SECTIONS 666 AND > 654, 657 COLLECTION AND DISTRIBUTION CITATION FROM THE > FEDERAL STATUTE OF THE US CODE > § 657. Distribution of > collected support > > > > > The following is an > abstract from the Administration for Children and > Families' website and the Administration for Child > Support Enforcement, both of which publish all statutory > guidelines for the collection of child support and payments > thereof to the recipient. > collection and > distribution of child support payments Within this site it > is defined as follows Frequently Asked Questions about Child > Support Collection/Distribution For answers to questions > about your own case, you need to check with your local or > state child support office. State CSE agency telephone > numbers and addresses are at > (English):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ > directories/ext/IVd_list.cfm > (Spanish):http://ocse3.acf.dhhs.gov/int/ > directories/ext/Espanol_IVd_ list.cfm State CSE agency web > site links are on our web site at the following > location: > http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/ > programs/cse/extinf.htm#exta The following general > information may be helpful: If the state collects more in a > month than is to be paid to the family for their current and > past due support, the rest of the money can be used to repay > the state and federal governments for cash assistance * AFDC > or TANF * that a family received. Also, child support > agencies can recover all or part of the costs of their > services from people who are not in a cash assistance > program. These can include the cost of legal work done by > agency attorneys or the costs of locating a parent, for > example. The money may be deducted from the child support > payment, or it may be collected from the noncustodial > parent. For more information on changes in the law and how > they may affect you, as well as the cost recovery practices > of your State, you should contact your State child support > enforcement agency. > > > > > > > Case Type: Paternity > DOR > Date Filed: > 08/29/2005 > Location: Div > 42 > Judicial Officer: Evans, > Robert M > > > Uniform Case Number: > 482005DR014270A001OX > > > Related Case Information > Related Cases > 2002-DR-006249-O > (Paternity) > Party > Information > > > Lead > Attorneys > Petitioner SHAW, SHEILA > JOCELYN BARBARA FANCHER (LIMITED) JONES, > Esquire > Retained > 407-849-1133(W) > > > Respondent GONZALEZ, > CARLOS ALBERTO > > > Events & Orders of > the Court DISPOSITIONS > 05/15/2012 > Order Denying (Judicial > Officer: Evans, Robert M) > > Tuesday, June 18, > 2013 12:39 PM > Subject: ATTORNEY > GENERAL COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST Hershkowitz Russell S > Attorney Category: Bankruptcy Law [Edit] 1110 Douglas Ave > Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 (407) 786-2889 > http://www.russellhlaw.com > > > > > > > Thank you for > contacting the Attorney General's Office regarding > ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT . Our > staff will process it as soon as possible and, if necessary, > respond appropriately. We appreciate hearing from concerned > citizens such as yourself. If you wish to keep abreast of > the activities of this office, you may wish to consider a > subscription to our electronic newsletter Weekly > Briefing. Or perhaps > our Consumer > Alerts. Should you wish to > subscribe to either, or both, publications, please visit > oursubscription > page. > > > > > > > > > > COMPLAINT FILED > AGAINST > RUSSELL SCOTT > HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire= > Retained > 407-786-2889( > 1110 Douglas > Ave > Altamonte Springs, FL > 32714 > (407) > 786-2889 > http://www.russellhlaw.com > > > > ATTORNEY > MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT & CHILD SUPPORT > RECOVERY ACT VIOLATIONS, FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION > LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING > JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW > VIOLATIONS > > > > > http://www.hinshawlaw.com/the-lawyers-lawyer-newsletter---recent-developments-in-risk-management-03-09-2012/ > > > Duty to report > misconduct; code of > conducthttps://www.facebook.com/OrangeClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 > > Edit with the Docs app Make tweaks, leave comments, and share with others to edit at the same time. NO THANKSUSE THE APP ACAP ATTY COMPLAINT 112,FRAUD ON THE COURT INQUIRY/COMPLAINT FORM ATTACHED DOCUMENT TO THE FLORIDA BAR THE SPECIFIC THING OR THINGS I AM COMPLAINING ABOUT ARE: THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300 ON THIS 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 SHEILA JOCELYN SHAW PO BOX 5147, TAMPA, FLORIDA 33657-5175 PARTY TO THE COMPLAINT: AGAINST THE ATTORNEY(S) FLORIDA BAR MEMBER(S): SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS MACKEY Heather Morcroft (Appellate Atty) 20 n Orange Ave Ste 700 Orlando 32801 FBN 0709859 407-325-3585 INFORMS THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (ACAP) WITHIN THE TIME AND STATUTORY LIMITATIONS OF 6 SIX YEARS, THAT THE FOREGOING COMPLAINT IS IN REGARDS TO THE VIOLATIONS SET FORTH: http://www.floridabar.org/divexe/rrtfb.nsf/FV/0B6C8E5CDCA464D685257172004B0FBD 4-8 MAINTAINING THE INTEGRITY OF THE PROFESSION RULE 4-8.4 MISCONDUCT THAT ON THE ONSET OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA SHAW, AS THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION 7, ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT: Juvenile Division 2000 E. Michigan St. Suite 300 Orlando, FL 32806 PROCEEDING WERE COMMENCED WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE HISTORICAL AND CONCURRENT CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS, AND HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS CONCURRENTLY PUBLISHED IN DIVISION 42 COURT, VIA CLERK OF THE ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE RISS DATABASE, THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR ACCOUNTS OF INTERAGENCY ACCESS WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. THE COMPLAINANT MAKES REFERENCE THAT THE ATTORNEY’S, WITH KNOWLEDGE, ACTED IN A DECEITFUL MANNER, NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF FRAUD RELATIVE TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS. "ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW WERE DIVESTED AND SUBSEQUENT LEGAL CAUSATION INCLUSIVE OF : 1. A MATERIAL INJURY IN THE PROCEEDINGS BELOW THAT CANNOT BE CONCLUDED ON POST JUDGEMENT APPEAL,2. INJURY WAS CAUSED BY A DEPARTURE FORM THE ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW (WHEN THEY ARE VIOLATED) OCCURRED. IMPROPER PURPOSE USED TO ACCESS TO THE FACILITY/HARASSMENT & TORTS)CONTINUATION OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT Fw: REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION TO REOPEN CASE CASE NO 2005-DR-014270-O DIVISION 42; Fw: ATTN KEITH PARKS Action founded on negligence, fraud and white collar criminal behavior 39.0141 A Missing Children Report is Required and is found to be absent in all proceedings prior to date. & 95.11 Tort actions for fraud or assault & 39.0014,39.0141 MISSING CHILDRENS REPORT REQUIRED WHICH IN ITS ABSENCE AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS CONSTITUTES FRAUD. TORT ACTIONS OF FRAUD INCLUSIVE OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND VAWA BY THE FATHERS TO CASE WHO KNEW THE ALLEGATIONS WERE FALSE THE ATTORNEY’S TO CASE DID NOT CONSOLIDATE THE TWO DIVISIONS, DIVISION 7 AND DIVISION 42, WITH KNOWLEDGE THAT A “THRESHOLD OF DEMONSTRATIVE SHOWING OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT” IN ADDITION TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CHILD WOULD BE NECESSARY UNDER PROVISIONS OUTLINED REGARDING MINORS TO JUVENILE DEPENDENCY COURT CIVIL RULES OF PRACTICE, FLORIDA STATUTES CHAPTER 39.PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO CHILDREN THE DEVASTATION FROM THE PRESIDING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL PROCESS ALONG WITH THE STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT, ATTORNEY DECEIT INCLUDED THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS: § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. Civil contempt is conduct directed against the rights of the opposing party. law-imposed obligation ;"an act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere with the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the dignity of the court or respect for its authority. There are two kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct contempt openly and in the presence of the court, resists the power of the court, 102 A. 400, 406; and consequential, or constructive contempt results from matters outside the court, such as failure to comply with orders. The basic standards governing fraud on the court are reasonably straightforward. As set forth in Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998): The requisite fraud on the court occurs where “it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.” Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989) . . . . The trial court has the inherent authority, within the exercise of sound judicial discretion, to dismiss an action when a plaintiff has perpetrated a fraud on the court, or where a party refuses to comply with court orders. Kornblum v. Schneider, 609 So. 2d 138, 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). The types of issues raised in habeas corpus petitions were coded into the following categories: ineffective assistance of counsel (failure to object to admissibility/sufficiency of evidence, failure to call witnesses, failure to cross-examine, and failure to object to denial of a continuance notion), trial court errors (failure to suppress improper evidence, improper jury instructions), (failure to disclose, use of perjured testimony, and inflammatory summation), 4th amendment (unlawful arrest), 5th amendment Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Title VIII consists of seven sections and is also referred to as the "Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of 2002". It describes specific criminal penalties for manipulation, destruction or alteration of financial records or other interference with investigations, while providing certain protections for whistleblowers. cc: (http://www.floridabar.org/divexe/rrtfb.nsf/FV/0B6C8E5CDCA464D685257172004B0FBD) A lawyer shall not: (a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another; (b) commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects; (c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, except that it shall not be professional misconduct for a lawyer for a criminal law enforcement agency or regulatory agency to advise others about or to supervise another in an undercover investigation, unless prohibited by law or rule, and it shall not be professional misconduct for a lawyer employed in a capacity other than as a lawyer by a criminal law enforcement agency or regulatory agency to participate in an undercover investigation, unless prohibited by law or rule; (d) engage in conduct in connection with the practice of law that is prejudicial to the administration of justice, including to knowingly, or through callous indifference, disparage, humiliate, or discriminate against litigants, jurors, witnesses, court personnel, or other lawyers on any basis, including, but not limited to, on account of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, national origin, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, age, socioeconomic status, employment, or physical characteristic; (e) state or imply an ability to influence improperly a government agency or official or to achieve results by means that violate the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law; (f) knowingly assist a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct or other law; (g) fail to respond, in writing, to any official inquiry by bar counsel or a disciplinary agency, as defined elsewhere in these rules, when bar counsel or the agency is conducting an investigation into the lawyer's conduct. A written response shall be made:(1) within 15 days of the date of the initial written investigative inquiry by bar counsel, grievance committee, or board of governors; (2) within 10 days of the date of any follow-up written investigative inquiries by bar counsel, grievance committee, or board of governors; (3) within the time stated in any subpoena issued under these Rules Regulating The Florida Bar (without additional time allowed for mailing); (4) as provided in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure or order of the referee in matters assigned to a referee; and (5) as provided in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure or order of the Supreme Court of Florida for matters pending action by that court. Except as stated otherwise herein or in the applicable rules, all times for response shall be calculated as provided elsewhere in these Rules Regulating The Florida Bar and may be extended or shortened by bar counsel or the disciplinary agency making the official inquiry upon good cause shown. Failure to respond to an official inquiry with no good cause shown may be a matter of contempt and processed in accordance with rule 3-7.11(f) of these Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. (h) willfully refuse, as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, to timely pay a child support obligation; or (i) engage in sexual conduct with a client or a representative of a client that exploits or adversely affects the interests of the client or the lawyer-client relationship. If the sexual conduct commenced after the lawyer-client relationship was formed it shall be presumed that the sexual conduct exploits or adversely affects the interests of the client or the lawyer-client relationship. A lawyer may rebut this presumption by proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the sexual conduct did not exploit or adversely affect the interests of the client or the lawyer-client relationship. The prohibition and presumption stated in this rule do not apply to a lawyer in the same firm as another lawyer representing the client if the lawyer involved in the sexual conduct does not personally provide legal services to the client and is screened from access to the file concerning the legal representation.Comment Lawyers are subject to discipline when they violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another, as when they request or instruct an agent to do so on the lawyer's behalf. Subdivision (a), however, does not prohibit a lawyer from advising a client concerning action the client is legally entitled to take, provided that the client is not used to indirectly violate the Rules of Professional Conduct. Many kinds of illegal conduct reflect adversely on fitness to practice law, such as offenses involving fraud and the offense of willful failure to file an income tax return. However, some kinds of offense carry no such implication. Traditionally, the distinction was drawn in terms of offenses involving "moral turpitude." That concept can be construed to include offenses concerning some matters of personal morality, such as adultery and comparable offenses, that have no specific connection to fitness for the practice of law. Although a lawyer is personally answerable to the entire criminal law, a lawyer should be professionally answerable only for offenses that indicate lack of those characteristics relevant to law practice. Offenses involving violence, dishonesty, breach of trust, or serious interference with the administration of justice are in that category. A pattern of repeated offenses, even ones of minor significance when considered separately, can indicate indifference to legal obligation. A lawyer may refuse to comply with an obligation imposed by law upon a good faith belief that no valid obligation exists. The provisions of rule 4-1.2(d) concerning a good faith challenge to the validity, scope, meaning, or application of the law apply to challenges of legal regulation of the practice of law. Subdivision (c) recognizes instances where lawyers in criminal law enforcement agencies or regulatory agencies advise others about or supervise others in undercover investigations, and provides an exception to allow the activity without the lawyer engaging in professional misconduct. The exception acknowledges current, acceptable practice of these agencies. Although the exception appears in this rule, it is also applicable to rules 4-4.1 and 4-4.3. However, nothing in the rule allows the lawyer to engage in such conduct if otherwise prohibited by law or rule. Subdivision (d) of this rule proscribes conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice. Such proscription includes the prohibition against discriminatory conduct committed by a lawyer while performing duties in connection with the practice of law. The proscription extends to any characteristic or status that is not relevant to the proof of any legal or factual issue in dispute. Such conduct, when directed towards litigants, jurors, witnesses, court personnel, or other lawyers, whether based on race, ethnicity, gender, religion, national origin, disability, marital status, sexual orientation, age, socioeconomic status, employment, physical characteristic, or any other basis, subverts the administration of justice and undermines the public's confidence in our system of justice, as well as notions of equality. This subdivision does not prohibit a lawyer from representing a client as may be permitted by applicable law, such as, by way of example, representing a client accused of committing discriminatory conduct. Lawyers holding public office assume legal responsibilities going beyond those of other citizens. A lawyer's abuse of public office can suggest an inability to fulfill the professional role of attorney. The same is true of abuse of positions of private trust such as trustee, executor, administrator, guardian, or agent and officer, director, or manager of a corporation or other organization. A lawyer's obligation to respond to an inquiry by a disciplinary agency is stated in subdivision (g) of this rule and subdivision (h)(2) of rule 3-7.6. While response is mandatory, the lawyer may deny the charges or assert any available privilege or immunity or interpose any disability that prevents disclosure of a certain matter. A response containing a proper invocation thereof is sufficient under the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. This obligation is necessary to ensure the proper and efficient operation of the disciplinary system. Subdivision (h) of this rule was added to make consistent the treatment of attorneys who fail to pay child support with the treatment of other professionals who fail to pay child support, in accordance with the provisions of section 61.13015, Florida Statutes. That section provides for the suspension or denial of a professional license due to delinquent child support payments after all other available remedies for the collection of child support have been exhausted. Likewise, subdivision (h) of this rule should not be used as the primary means for collecting child support, but should be used only after all other available remedies for the collection of child support have been exhausted. Before a grievance may be filed or a grievance procedure initiated under this subdivision, the court that entered the child support order must first make a finding of willful refusal to pay. The child support obligation at issue under this rule includes both domestic (Florida) and out-of-state (URESA) child support obligations, as well as arrearages. Subdivision (i) proscribes exploitation of the client or the lawyer-client relationship by means of commencement of sexual conduct. The lawyer-client relationship is grounded on mutual trust. A sexual relationship that exploits that trust compromises the lawyer-client relationship. Attorneys have a duty to exercise independent professional judgment on behalf of clients. Engaging in sexual relationships with clients has the capacity to impair the exercise of that judgment.FALSE STATEMENTS MISCONDUCT FALSE KIDNAPPING REPORTS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AND TO THE JUVENILE COURT LEGAL PHILANTHROPY MISUSE OF OFFICE INSTITUTIONAL CHILD ABUSE LEGAL ABUSE LAWYER MISCONDUCT ETHNIC BIASEDNESS MOCKERY TRIAL ERROR INTENTIONAL OMISSIONS ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NON SUPPORT & CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY ACT VIOLATIONS, FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW VIOLATIONS THAT ON THE ONSET OF PROCEEDINGS DATED 02/03/2011 AGAINST SHEILA SHAW, AS THE DEFENDANT IN JUVENILE DEPENDENCY TRIAL, DIVISION 7, ORANGE COUNTY LOCATED AT: Juvenile Division 2000 E. Michigan St. Suite 300 Orlando, FL 32806 PROCEEDING WERE COMMENCED WITHOUT FULL DISCLOSURE OF THE PLAINTIFFS’ TO CASE HISTORICAL AND CONCURRENT CRIMINAL BACKGROUNDS, AND HISTORICAL DATA THAT WAS CONCURRENTLY PUBLISHED IN DIVISION 42 COURT, VIA CLERK OF THE ORANGE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT, MAINTAINED AS WELL IN THE RECORDS MANAGEMENT DIVISION, THE RISS DATABASE, THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN’S RECORDS OR ACCOUNTS OF INTERAGENCY ACCESS WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. THE COMPLAINANT MAKES REFERENCE THAT THE ATTORNEY’S, WITH KNOWLEDGE, ACTED IN A DECEITFUL MANNER, NOT DISCLOSING INFORMATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF FRAUD RELATIVE TOWARDS THE OUTCOME OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS. "ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW WERE DIVESTED AND SUBSEQUENT LEGAL CAUSATION INCLUSIVE OF : 1. A MATERIAL INJURY IN THE PROCEEDINGS BELOW THAT CANNOT BE CONCLUDED ON POST JUDGEMENT APPEAL,2. INJURY WAS CAUSED BY A DEPARTURE FORM THE ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE LAW (WHEN THEY ARE VIOLATED) OCCURRED. THE ATTORNEY’S TO CASE DID NOT CONSOLIDATE THE TWO DIVISIONS, DIVISION 7 AND DIVISION 42, WITH KNOWLEDGE THAT A “THRESHOLD OF DEMONSTRATIVE SHOWING OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT” IN ADDITION TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CHILD WOULD BE NECESSARY UNDER PROVISIONS OUTLINED REGARDING MINORS TO JUVENILE DEPENDENCY COURT CIVIL RULES OF PRACTICE, FLORIDA STATUTES CHAPTER 39.PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO CHILDREN THE DEVASTATION FROM THE PRESIDING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL PROCESS ALONG WITH THE STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT, ATTORNEY DECEIT INCLUDED THE FOLLOWING VIOLATIONS: § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. Civil contempt is conduct directed against the rights of the opposing party. law-imposed obligation ;"an act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere with the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the dignity of the court or respect for its authority. There are two kinds, direct and constructive." 249 S. 2d 127, 128. direct contempt openly and in the presence of the court, resists the power of the court, 102 A. 400, 406; and consequential, or constructive contempt results from matters outside the court, such as failure to comply with orders. The basic standards governing fraud on the court are reasonably straightforward. As set forth in Cox v. Burke, 706 So. 2d 43, 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998): The requisite fraud on the court occurs where “it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.” Aoude v. Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 1115, 1118 (1st Cir. 1989) . . . . The trial court has the inherent authority, within the exercise of sound judicial discretion, to dismiss an action when a plaintiff has perpetrated a fraud on the court, or where a party refuses to comply with court orders. Kornblum v. Schneider, 609 So. 2d 138, 139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). The types of issues raised in habeas corpus petitions were coded into the following categories: ineffective assistance of counsel (failure to object to admissibility/sufficiency of evidence, failure to call witnesses, failure to cross-examine, and failure to object to denial of a continuance notion), trial court errors (failure to suppress improper evidence, improper jury instructions), (failure to disclose, use of perjured testimony, and inflammatory summation), 4th amendment (unlawful arrest), 5th amendment Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Title VIII consists of seven sections and is also referred to as the "Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of 2002". It describes specific criminal penalties for manipulation, destruction or alteration of financial records or other interference with investigations, while providing certain protections for whistleblowers. cc: Letter regarding fraud on the court,absent administrative remedy or action in a timely manner, that such a biasedness occurred it is described as unconscionably ethnically biased, a white collar criminal act by a party who misused his/her office to aid and assist avoidance of judicial action, that the action was in violation of the minor to case’s rights, that the action was in violation of parental rights to recovery of child support and paternity establishment in the Orange County, Ninth Judicial Circuit and Court, Division 42. Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 12:39 PM Subject: ATTORNEY GENERAL COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST Hershkowitz Russell S Attorney Category: Bankruptcy Law [Edit] 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 (407) 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com Thank you for contacting the Attorney General's Office regarding ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NONSUPPORT . Our staff will process it as soon as possible and, if necessary, respond appropriately. We appreciate hearing from concerned citizens such as yourself. If you wish to keep abreast of the activities of this office, you may wish to consider a subscription to our electronic newsletter Weekly Briefing. Or perhaps our Consumer Alerts. Should you wish to subscribe to either, or both, publications, please visit our subscription page. COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST RUSSELL SCOTT HERSHKOWITZ, Esquire= Retained 407-786-2889( 1110 Douglas Ave Altamonte Springs, FL 32714 (407) 786-2889 http://www.russellhlaw.com ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT/ASSISTING CRIMINAL NON SUPPORT & CHILD SUPPORT RECOVERY ACT VIOLATIONS, FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTION LAWS, SOCIAL SECURITY ACT 654,655,666,NEGLIGENCE, ASSISTING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT,BUSINESS TORT LAW VIOLATIONS http://www.hinshawlaw.com/the-lawyers-lawyer-newsletter---recent-developments-in-risk-management-03-09-2012/ The duty to report misconduct is one of the ethical duties imposed on attorneys in the United States by the rules governing professional responsibility. With certain exceptions, an attorney who becomes aware that either a fellow attorney or a judge has committed an act in violation of the rules of e... Duty to report misconduct; code of conduct https://www.facebook.com/OrangClerk?ref=ts#!/pages/Duty-to-report-misconduct/136147606416830?fref=ts&rf=144393985578228 ( TORT LAW: A tort is a civil wrong resulting from a violation of a legal right not created by contract for which monetary redress is provided. This may be (a) an act or (b) an omission. More formally, a tort may be defined as a wrongful act or omission arising in the course of social re ships other than contracts which violates a person's legally protected rights for which the law provides a remedy in the form of an action for damages. There are two basic classifications of torts: (a) negligence which is the result of an unintentional act (b) intentional acts or omissions which results in a breach of someone's rights. There is a third group in this area that should be explained. It is referred to as strict liability.) 8-2.241 Civil Laws Governing Law Enforcement Misconduct BUT ALSO LAWS THAT ARE FOR THE PREVENTION OF NEGLECT OF THE CHILD. 827.03 Abuse, aggravated abuse, and neglect of a child; penalties.— intentional act that could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child; or (c) Active encouragement of any person to commit an act that results or could reasonably be expected to result in physical or mental injury to a child. A person who knowingly or willfully abuses a child without causing great bodily harm, Subject: professional misconduct, failure to comply nonprofit compliance, ethnic biasedness and duty to report misconduct by attorney of judicial misconduct signed and filed a valid declaration of paternity that has the force and effect of a judgment, enforceable by contempt REQUIREMENT OF STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED PROCEDURES TO IMPROVE EFFECTIVENESS OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] (a) In order to satisfy section 454(20)(A), each State must have in effect laws requiring the use of the following procedures, consistent with this section and with regulations of the Secretary, to increase the effectiveness of the program which the State administers under this part: Sec. 466. [42 U.S.C. 666] (a (C) Voluntary paternity acknowledgment.— (iv) Use of paternity acknowledgment affidavit.—Such procedures must require the State to develop and use an affidavit for the voluntary acknowledgment of paternity which includes the minimum requirements of the affidavit specified by the Secretary under section 452(a)(7) for the voluntary acknowledgment of paternity, and to give full faith and credit to such an affidavit signed in any other State according to its procedures. THERE HAS BEEN A BREACH OF DUTY/NEGLECT OF DUTY WHEREAS ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION WOULD HAVE REMEDIED AN EXTENSIVE DELAY IN PROVIDING ADEQUATE CHILD SUPPORT OR FINANCIAL SUPPORT. IT IS ALSO MORE THAT SUSPECTED THAT THE UNTIMELY DELAYS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING BREACH(ES) the 1996 reforms require States to adopt laws that give the CSE agency authority to initiate a series of expedited procedures without the necessity of obtaining an order from any other administrative agency or judicial tribunal and The Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (VAWA) and the 1997 Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act and MISUSE OF OFFICE UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAW You cannot use information available to you because of your job, but not available to the public, for your personal benefit or for the benefit of others. § 112.313(8), Fla. Stat. Title VI allows Office of the Secretary Office of Re-Entry 501 S. Calhoun Street, Room 442 Tallahassee, FL, 32399 Main Number: (850) 717-3050 Fax: (850) 922-2238 Re-Entry Programs Staff Kim Riley | Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary / Director of Re-Entry | 850-717-3051 Riley.Kim@mail.dc.state.fl.us Patrick Mahoney | Chief of Transition and Substance Abuse Treatment Services | 850-717-3058 Mahoney.Patrick@mail.dc.state.fl.us John L. Lewis | Chief of Education | 850-717-3650 Lewis.John@mail.dc.state.fl.us Alex Taylor | Chaplaincy Services | 850-717-3157 Taylor.Alex@mail.dc.state.fl.us CITIZEN VICTIM COMPLAINT: SUBSTANCE ABUSE INVOLVING A MINOR, VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN HATE CRIMES AND FRAUDULENT TORTS, PARTICIPATION IN CONTINUED CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES RELATING TO MENTAL HEALTH OR DISABILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH: Jarrid Williams probation DC 346801 OFFICER HUDSON 40729720000 1991 drug charge controlled substance, 1993 Nov Dec1995, 2015 April controlled substance DUI 407 8363000 Jarrid Williams 1991 drug charge controlled substance, 1993 Nov Dec1995, 2015 April controlled substance DUI 407 8363000 Jarrid Williams/Fw: HATE CRIME/PUBLIC OFFICER STALKING THROUGH INTIMATE FAMILY TIES/INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE THROUGH INSTITUTIONAL VIOLENCE, PRESENTLY A PARENTAL ALIENATION TORT SUSPECTED INVOLVEMENT IN VEHICLE THEFTS CASE #s 535i BMW WBAHD2317K2091635 http://twitdoc.com/3Z89 RICO/Vehicle Theft/Auto Parts,original owner/seller Frank Furino the Owner of MAACO 917 Mercy Dr, Orl,FL32808. criminal enterprising through fraud,mail fraud, goo.gl/h9wjQr VICTIMS IN CASES Family violence complaint principal cases of origin Indiana associated complaint regarding dissolution/http://goo.gl/RvP2US, improper purpose MISUSE OF OFFICE,http://goo.gl/h9wjQr 775.0844 Aggravated white collar crime § 112.313(8), FL EMPLOYEE FAMILY TIES MISCONDUCT CF OPERATING PROCEDURE #180-4 MANDATORY REQUIRED http://goo.gl/h9wjQr CC: Florida Department of Corrections 501 South Calhoun Street Tallahassee, FL 32399-2500, (850) 717-3444, FAX: (850) 487-4427 E-Mail: co-supervision@mail.dc.state.fl.us 407-836-3652 ORANGE COUNTY FLORIDA PO ERICKA SEAMAN RE: complaints of domestic violence, parental alienation, fraud on the court, child abuse, VAWA complaint was made against JARRID DESHAUN WILLIAMS REGARDING MY DAUGHTER ISIS JASHUANA C. J. SHAW 4135 KIRKLAND BLVD, ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32810 THE REPORT WAS MADE TO JARRID D. WILLIAM’S COUNTY PROBATION OFFICER FOR WHICH JARRID DESHAUN WILLIAMS IS CURRENTLY ON COUNTY PROBATION FOR DUI WITH A MINOR, MY DAUGHTER ISIS JASHAUNA C. J. SHAW Complaint foregoes that Jarrid Deshaun Williams has been reported to the Florida Department of Children & Families on several incidents including child abuse, neglect, fraud, violence against women & children in addition to such an “outrageous” pattern of violence towards the child’s mother, Sheila Jocelyn Shaw, whereas the as the paternal party to the child custody case and child support case registered in Orange County, Jarrid Deshaun Williams was instructed to comply with THE PARENTAL RIGHTS OF SHEILA JOCELYN SHAW & VISITATION WITH THE MINOR of which Jarrid Deshaun Williams through the course of this period has abused the court order and is now in contempt of court by illustrating child concealment, false statements in the community against the mother, defamation and as previously stated child abuse by parental alienation. Mr. Williams’ conduct was reported to the probation officer regarding the criminal activities involved including criminal enterprising and faith based violence including fraud to block the child’s reunification with the mother, in addition to continued acts of violence which has been reported to law enforcement. The misconduct or negligence by the public officer(s) involving family ties has been the problem throughout the case including attorney misconduct and Florida Department of Families and Children Employee Misconduct including once again identification problems as to the “role” or “duties” in preventing further criminal activities by Jarrid Deshaun Williams in preinvestigation and ongoing investigations supplied to the courts in Orange County. Violation of Conduct or Professional Standards Duty of conduct- willful, intentional knowledge of the course of action or lack of action would result in further domestic violence or intentional misconduct that was meant to cause economic torts. Jarrid Deshaun Williams is a habitual drug substance abuse offender. Court Documentation states: ORANGE COUNTY COURT CASE HISTORIES THE LATER OF THE CASES WAS HEARD BY Judge: Tanya Davis Wilson, Case Type:Criminal Traffic Date Filed: 1/4/2015 Location Orlando - TR UCN: 482015CT000044000AOX 1/3/2015 OBTS:8 Sequence:1 Control Number:201500003938 Arresting Agency:Orlando Police Department 1. CT-DUI WITH MINOR IN CAR OR BAL OF .20 OR HIGHER Statute: 316.193(4) First Degree - Misd 1 2000-TR-011927-A-W STATE OF FLORIDA VS. JARRID DESHAUN WILLIAMS Civil Traffic Infraction 08/20/1970 W Michael Miller 02/03/2000 2 2008-TR-154128-A-O STATE OF FLORIDA VS. JARRID DESHAUN WILLIAMS Civil Traffic Infraction 08/20/1970 98 Hearing Officer 09/15/2008 3 2009-TR-035184-A-O STATE OF FLORIDA VS. JARRID DESHAUN WILLIAMS Civil Traffic Infraction 08/20/1970 98 Hearing Officer 03/19/2009 4 2010-TR-161844-A-O STATE OF FLORIDA vs. WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN Civil Traffic Infraction 08/20/1970 98 Hearing Officer 11/17/2010 5 2011-TR-018263-A-W STATE OF FLORIDA vs. WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN Civil Traffic Infraction 08/20/1970 95 Hearing Officer 05/10/2011 6 2012-TR-029701-A-O STATE OF FLORIDA vs. WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN Civil Traffic Infraction 08/20/1970 98 Hearing Officer 03/07/2012 7 2013-TR-072280-A-O STATE OF FLORIDA vs. WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN Civil Traffic Infraction 08/20/1970 98 Hearing Officer 06/10/2013 8 2013-TR-072282-A-O STATE OF FLORIDA vs. WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN Civil Traffic Infraction 08/20/1970 98 Hearing Officer 06/10/2013 9 2013-TR-078400-A-O STATE OF FLORIDA vs. WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN Civil Traffic Infraction 08/20/1970 98 Hearing Officer 06/15/2013 10 2015-CT-000044-A-O STATE OF FLORIDA vs. WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN Criminal Traffic 08/20/1970 Tanya Davis Wilson 01/04/2015 11 2015-TR-003700-A-O STATE OF FLORIDA vs. WILLIAMS, JARRID DESHAUN Civil Traffic Infraction 08/20/1970 Tanya Davis Wilson 01/08/2015 Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android