Intentional divestation from ethical standards,the Creed of professional ism & perpetuated institution violence, white collar crime

RE:   9457320158 RFA CASE#   1143172973  False Report FRAUD TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS AFTER AN EARLIER DISMISSED ALLEGATION IN THE FL NINTH DISTRICT JUVENILE COURTS -6 DAYS PRIOR- THE SAME FL DCF CPI'S MISUSE OF OFFICE TO HARASS ME OUT ON THE ORLANDO, FL STREET WITH A SCENE AT A NEIGHBORHOOD GROCER - COPS & OVER INFLATED BEHAVIOUR BY THE ACCOMPANYING CPI WHO GOT OUT THEIR GOVERNMENT VEHICLE YELLING "ITS OVER!, ITS OVER!" LOUD ENOUGH FOR THE SMALL NEIGHBORHOOD BLOCK & COMMUNITY TO FORM SOME TYPE OF OPINION THAT A CRIMINAL ACT OR CHARGE WAS INVOLVED - ESCORTED BY THE POLICE WITH NO COURT PAPER WORK - THEY DETAINED OR TEMPORARILY PLACED THE TWO CHILDREN OVERNIGHT WITH THEIR DADS, (WHO SHE HAD ALREADY CALLED OUT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD BEFORE THE STOP) PRACTICALLY STRANGERS WHO WERE CALLED AS THE OTHER BIOLOGICAL PARENT RATHER THAN THE EXISTENCE OF A PREEXISTING RELATIONSHIP FOR MY KID TO STAY IN A STRANGER'S HOME UNTIL HER FALSE ALLEGATION WAS DISMISSED THE NEXT MORNING. ALL TAKING PLACE WITHIN TWO DAYS OF MY DAUGHTER'S BIRTHDAY "HOLIDAY" ON 1/29/2011. FL CLASSIFIES CRIMES COMMITTED AROUND HOLIDAYS AS HATE CRIMES! OUTRIGHT MOCKERIES THE DAD IS THE ONE WITH NUMEROUS CRIMINAL CHARGES

Dismissed by Judge Anthony H. Johnson

01/27/2011, 6 Days earlier was a fraudulent claim.

Then Handley goes back into her "venue" & lies & reports that there are two missing children on February 3, 2011 in RETALIATION AFTER THEIR INITIAL LOSS.

BUT YOU DIDN'T TELL JUDGE DONALD GRINCEWITZ THAT. NOR DID YOU EVEN MENTION ANYTHING ABOUT A "MISSING CHILD" THAT COULD BE USED IN AN APPEAL ACCORDING TO THE FLORIDA CI   lawyer should not knowingly misstate, distort, or improperly exaggerate any fact or opinion nor permit the lawyer’s silence or inaction to mislead anyone.  What is Fraud on the Court? Fraud on the Court, or Fraud upon the Court, is where a material misrepresentation has been made to the court, or by the court itself. The main requirement is that the impartiality of the court has been so disrupted that it can’t perform its tasks without bias or prejudice. Some examples of fraud on the court include: Fraud in the service of court summons (such as withholding a court summons from a party) Corruption or influence of a court member or official Judicial fraud Intentionally failing to inform the parties of necessary appointments or requirements, in efforts to obstruct the judicial process “Unconscionable” schemes to deceive or make misrepresentations through the court system It’s important to note that fraud on the court only involves court officials or officers of the court, such as judges or court-appointed attorneys. The fraud must be directed at the “judicial machinery” itself. Fraud on the court generally does NOT mean: Fraud between the two opposing parties Submission of fraudulent documents Perjury or false statements by witnesses

For the official who acted in fraud upon the court, they may very well be required to step down from their position and may even be subjected to criminal consequences like a fine or a jail sentence. It could also result in other serious consequences, such as an attorney being disbarred, or a judge being removed from service.

If a court official is found to be biased or prejudiced even before fraud occurs, they are required to excuse themselves from the case, and a different official must be appointed. In some jurisidictions, a trial tainted by fraud on the court will be vacated or set aside for a certain time period

391956  Mail Address: Tangel-Rodriguez & Assoc 222 Weber St Orlando, FL 32803-3831  United States  Office: 407-849-1133  Cell: 407-849-1133   

SHAYAN ELAHI ESQ 41221 WAYNE STARR ANTHONY SOS GUARDIA AD LITEM CLAUDIA HERNANDEZ 667498 AMANDA ETZKORN 25942 CEDRIC TIBON DORIS MACKEY Heather Morcroft (Appellate Atty) 20 n Orange Ave Ste 700 Orlando 32801 FBN 0709859 407-325-3585 Attorney for Jarrid D. Williams  Carlos Alberto Gonzalez Bar Number: 656755 Mail Address: Wayne Starr P.A. PO Box 560206 Orlando, FL 32856-0206 United States Office: 407-228-7280 Fax: 407-228-4296 Email: waynestarr@cfl.rr.com

Case# 482005DR014270A001OX)  THE FLORIDA BAR ATTORNEY/CONSUMER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 651 EAST JEFFERSON STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2300    (KNOWLEDGE OF FRAUD AND INTENTIONAL OMISSION BY THE OTHER ATTYS - ". As an officer of the court, a lawyer cannot have his client perjure himself on the stand, that is, if that lawyer knows it is a lie

...What is Fraud on the Court? Fraud on the Court, or Fraud upon the Court, is where a material misrepresentation has been made to the court, or by the court itself. The main requirement is that the impartiality of the court has been so disrupted that it can’t perform its tasks without bias or prejudice. Some examples of fraud on the court include: Fraud in the service of court summons (such as withholding a court summons from a party) Corruption or influence of a court member or official Judicial fraud Intentionally failing to inform the parties of necessary appointments or requirements, in efforts to obstruct the judicial process “Unconscionable” schemes to deceive or make misrepresentations through the court system It’s important to note that fraud on the court only involves court officials or officers of the court, such as judges or court-appointed attorneys. The fraud must be directed at the “judicial machinery” itself. Fraud on the court generally does NOT mean: Fraud between the two opposing parties Submission of fraudulent documents Perjury or false statements by witnesses

For the official who acted in fraud upon the court, they may very well be required to step down from their position and may even be subjected to criminal consequences like a fine or a jail sentence. It could also result in other serious consequences, such as an attorney being disbarred, or a judge being removed from service.

If a court official is found to be biased or prejudiced even before fraud occurs, they are required to excuse themselves from the case, and a different official must be appointed. In some jurisidictions, a trial tainted by fraud on the court will be vacated or set aside for a certain time period (such as two years), to be “reopened” at a later date. 

Register of Actions

Case No. 2002-DR-050423-I

SHAW, SHEILA J vs. COLEMAN, JIMMY L

§ § § § § §

Case Type: Income Deduction Order Date Filed: 03/09/2002 Location: Family Uniform Case Number: 482002DR050423A001IX

Party Information

				Lead Attorneys
Petitioner	SHAW, SHEILA J
Respondent	COLEMAN, JIMMY L, JR

Events & Orders of the Court

			DISPOSITIONS
03/09/2002			Income Deduction Order
			OTHER EVENTS AND HEARINGS
06/11/2008			Notice of Need for Redirection Notice of Need for Redirection|NOTICE OF NEED FOR REDIRECTION
05/29/2008			Notice Termination of IV-D Services Notice Termination of IV-D Services|NOTICE TERMINATION OF IV-D SERVICES
05/29/2008			Notice of Change of Address Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS OF PAYEE
05/08/2008			Notice Termination of IV-D Services Notice Termination of IV-D Services|NOTICE TERMINATION OF IV-D SERVICES
04/30/2008			Notice of Need for Redirection Notice of Need for Redirection|NOTICE OF NEED FOR REDIRECTION
03/19/2007			Notice of Change of Address Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS OF PAYEE
11/15/2006			Notice of Change of Address Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS OF PAYEE
08/29/2005			Notice of Change of Address Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS OF PAYEE
05/17/2005			Notice of Change of Address Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS
04/18/2005			Notice of Change of Address Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS OF PAYEE
12/28/2004			Notice of Change of Address Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS
07/13/2004			Notice of Change of Address Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS
05/18/2004			Notice of Change of Address Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS
05/17/2004			Notice of Change of Address Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS
05/05/2004			Notice of Change of Address Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS
03/23/2004			Conversion Conversion|CONVERSION LETTER FROM HRS (PAYMENT REDIRECTION)
01/06/2004			Notice of Change of Address Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS
11/24/2003			Notice of Change of Address Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS
11/19/2003			Notice of Change of Address Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE CHANGE OF ADDRESS
11/04/2003			Notice of Need for Redirection Notice of Need for Redirection|NOTICE OF NEED FOR REDIRECTION
12/10/2002			Case Reassigned to Division Case Reassigned to Division|CASE REASSIGNED TO JUDGE ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE TO DIVISION 42
10/18/2002			Notice of Change of Address Notice of Change of Address|NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS
03/09/2002			Order Order|ORDER *
03/09/2002			Order Closing/Disbursing Funds Order Closing/Disbursing Funds|ORDER CLOSING/DISBURSING FUNDS

https://www.floridabar.org/prof/presources/presources002/

A lawyer should not knowingly misstate, distort, or improperly exaggerate any fact or opinion nor permit the lawyer’s silence or inaction to mislead anyone

 (Definition of Professionalism, The Standing
Committee on Professionalism.)
A lawyer is not normally subject to Florida Bar discipline for violating professionalism
expectations, but the Supreme Court has stated that in some cases, unprofessional behavior can
also violate the ethics standards stated in the Florida Rules of Professional Conduct, particularly
Rule 4-8.4(d), which describes lawyer misconduct that is prejudicial to the administration of
justice. In other words, if a lawyer’s unprofessional conduct is sufficiently severe, the lawyer
may subject to discipline under the “ethics” rules, the Florida Rules of Professional Conduct.
There are a number of documents that collect the expectations for lawyer professionalism in
Florida into one “integrated standard.” In its Code for Resolving Professionalism Complaints, the
Florida Supreme Court names the following documents as containing the integrated standards it
has for lawyer professional conduct:
o The Florida Bar Professionalism Expectations;
o The Florida Bar Oath of Professionalism;
o The Florida Bar Creed of Professionalism;
o The Florida Rules Regulating the Florida Bar; and
o The decisions of the Florida Supreme Court.
In its Code for Resolving Professionalism Complaints, the Supreme Court says that “substantial
or repeated violations” of the standards announced in the documents above constitute
“unprofessional conduct.”
Unprofessional conduct as described in these documents that does not rise to the level of a
violation of the Florida Rules of Professional Conduct can be handled through an informal
process described in the Florida Supreme Court’s Code for Resolving Professionalism
Complaints. That process allows any person to initiate a professionalism complaint with The
Florida Bar or with a Local Professionalism Panel. Usually, these Panels are made up of lawyers
in the circuit.
The Bar or a Local Professionalism Panel can resolve Professionalism Complaints informally by
providing remedial guidance, if needed. A Panel cannot discipline a lawyer. Alternatively, if the
complaint cannot be resolved informally, the Bar or the Local Professionalism Panel can refer to
matter to The Florida Bar for an investigation into whether the unprofessional conduct violated
the Florida Rules of Professional Conduct.
Although the Florida Supreme Court does not include other professionalism standards as part of
its process for resolving professionalism complaints, students should be aware that there may be
additional guidelines that come from courts or local bar associations.


Creed of Professionalism
I revere the law, the judicial system, and the legal profession and will at all times
in my professional and private lives uphold the dignity and esteem of each.
I will further my profession's devotion to public service and to the public good.
I will strictly adhere to the spirit as well as the letter of my profession's code of
ethics, to the extent that the law permits and will at all times be guided by a
fundamental sense of honor, integrity, and fair play.
I will not knowingly misstate, distort, or improperly exaggerate any fact or opinion
and will not improperly permit my silence or inaction to mislead anyone.
I will conduct myself to assure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of
every action and resolution of every controversy.
I will abstain from all rude, disruptive, disrespectful, and abusive behavior and will
at all times act with dignity, decency, and courtesy.
I will respect the time and commitments of others.
I will be diligent and punctual in communicating with others and in fulfilling
commitments.
I will exercise independent judgment and will not be governed by a client's ill will
or deceit.
My word is my bond.

Claudia Hernandez

Claudia Hernandez, 

667498

Mail Address:

2714 Middle St
Orlando, FL 32807-6414 
United States

Office: 321-202-0328

Email:

claudiah45@gmail.com

Personal Bar URL:

https://www.floridabar.org/mybarprofile/667498

is our senior Associate Attorney. Ms. Hernandez is a Mexican-American who relocated to Florida in 1999. She is a member of the Florida Bar and was most recently employed by the Department of Children and Families (DCF), Children’s Legal Services, as a Senior Attorney. In this capacity, Ms. Hernandez handled a busy docket advocating on behalf of Florida’s children. She has been the lead attorney in hundreds of child welfare hearings before the Dependency Court.

Representing the State of Florida and prosecuting dependency matters before the Florida Circuit Court, Ms. Hernandez handled the direct and cross examination of expert witnesses, law enforcement and medical professionals, the preparation of witnesses for trial and advocacy before judges in an adversarial process. This work required due consideration be given to the health and well being of the children, the health and well being of their parents and a general assessment of what would be in the “best interest” of the children for which Ms. Hernandez advocated for in the Circuit Court. Ms. Hernandez’s work also involved the provision of legal advice and counsel to the employees and service contract providers working with DCF.

Wayne Starr

DIRECTORIES

Lawyer

Authorized House Counsels

Certified Foreign Legal Consultants

Law Faculty Affiliates

Florida Registered Paralegals

Courts

Legal Groups

Judicial Nominating Commissions

Florida Government

Federal Government

Wayne Starr

Member in Good Standing

Eligible to Practice Law in Florida

Bar Number:

656755

Mail Address:

Wayne Starr P.A.
PO Box 560206
Orlando, FL 32856-0206 
United States

Office: 407-228-7280

Cell: 407-228-7280 - No Text Messages

Fax: 407-228-4296

Email:

waynestarr@cfl.rr.com

Personal Bar URL:

https://www.floridabar.org/mybarprofile/656755

Disrupted impartiality of the court...

What is Fraud on the Court? Fraud on the Court, or Fraud upon the Court, is where a material misrepresentation has been made to the court, or by the court itself. The main requirement is that the impartiality of the court has been so disrupted that it can’t perform its tasks without bias or prejudice. Some examples of fraud on the court include: Fraud in the service of court summons (such as withholding a court summons from a party) Corruption or influence of a court member or official Judicial fraud Intentionally failing to inform the parties of necessary appointments or requirements, in efforts to obstruct the judicial process “Unconscionable” schemes to deceive or make misrepresentations through the court system It’s important to note that fraud on the court only involves court officials or officers of the court, such as judges or court-appointed attorneys. The fraud must be directed at the “judicial machinery” itself. Fraud on the court generally does NOT mean: Fraud between the two opposing parties Submission of fraudulent documents Perjury or false statements by witnesses

For the official who acted in fraud upon the court, they may very well be required to step down from their position and may even be subjected to criminal consequences like a fine or a jail sentence. It could also result in other serious consequences, such as an attorney being disbarred, or a judge being removed from service.

If a court official is found to be biased or prejudiced even before fraud occurs, they are required to excuse themselves from the case, and a different official must be appointed. In some jurisidictions, a trial tainted by fraud on the court will be vacated or set aside for a certain time period (such as two years), to be “reopened” at a later date.